HHO TRUTH?

[wcemichael]

I've also have a 95 Ford Exporer, that use to get 15 MPG. I used MY HHO unit and got a reading of 20 MPG. nothing else was done to it. I also did something you can't do with a gas engine, I ran with ethinol at a 75/25% ethinol/gas ratio. there was a small drop in power but the truck did fine. It also ran at the original 15MPG. (the same MPG running gas/no HHO. It should have been less). If HHO is a bonafide scam then NOBODY would get any positive results and instanty stop using it, including me!

[wcemichael]

I've had the same motorcycle for years. It always went 60 miles + or - a couple of miles on a 2 gal tank. I've heard about hho and have been trying it. I got a real simple system anyone can copy from me free. I replaced a couple of items & saved back the power to run the hho unit, mostly because if you add 1 extra thing to a rice burner, the battery will drain. This year I've constantly been been getting 80 miles on the same tank. Saying I imagined it for 20+ fill ups doen't seem to convince me.

[hhoResearcher]

No, but I know, I feel it is possible!

[snappyboy1]

At least the Bush governments idea about hydrogen is to use petroleum as the base material. Thus needing more petroleum and producing more carbon than just burning oil. We know that water is the only source of hydrogen that is practical. A catalytic reaction not using electricity will be found someday by us. And that will be it.

[hhoResearcher]

Yeah! I spend a lot of time researching hho stuf, and try to guess - the miracle is true! I am a happy man, because I know it works! God bless all hho researchers like me! Yes, some times the tings go more complicated, but when you are on the run for inventions there is no road to folow, so you just have to build one! God Bless all invertors!

[thefencejumperengine]

@hhoResearcher Have you had any success getting more power out than you put in? Just an honest question.

[MaN1aC666]

i got it here and it's working on solar energy ... i'm able to run a torch or a small engine out of it, you need time an patience to get there but it does work !



[HaroldDPrice]

I agree that people don't need to used vulgar language to respond. However I clicked on to your video to explore ideas, and I must say found your video a waist of time... sorry for that, but the questions have been already asked and many are exploring many possible technologies to develop clean free energy. So if you decide to make another video, please have something to contribute

[billysgeo]

"All those PSEUDOscientist"?

Who? Stan Mayer? The great father of "snake oil" sellers?!

Don't make me laugh!

[Kep2078]

Автор дебил, неужели он решил, что ДВС эффективнее топливных элементов?

[shtirlic76tube]

@Kep2078 ты, похоже, не до конца понял суть. Стэн Мэйер придумал дешевый способ добычи водорода из воды. Эффективность настолько высока, что двигатель работает на воде из любого источника(река, океан, лужа). Бензин для машины не нужен. Топливо - вода. А двигатель можно оставить какой есть.

К сожалению, через день после его обращения в Пентагон, он "случайно" отравился

[Kep2078]

@shtirlic76tube Придумал... отравился... откуда мне узнать правду? Я опираюсь на свой опыт, по которому все поделки суперэффективных бульбуляторов не стоят и выеденного яйца. Тут на ютьюбе миллион видео показывающих магию ННО, но нет ни одного решения готового к употреблению, всё зависает на уровне наколенных поделок, потому, что идея мертва в зародыше.

[shtirlic76tube]

@Kep2078 Так вот и я пытаюсь разобраться что правда, что вымысел. Удивляет обилие видео на ютубе, но как то мало чего используется как ты верно выразился бульбулятор. Из всех машин, которые имеют кпд больше 100% мне известен Кольцар Лазарева, вечный двигатель второго рода, но мощность у него смешная

[Kep2078]

@shtirlic76tube Обрати внимание еще на одну вещь, все теоретические модели суперэффективных ячеек Майера предполагают использовать высокое импульсное напряжение и воду без электролита, а все практические воплощения поголовно используют низкое напряжение (12В) и воду добавляют электролиты. Оригинально правда? Насчет кольцара ничего не скажу т.к. схем для меня мало, нужно работающее устройство.

[Me102288]

dousnt matter if you believe anything, A lot of ppl are using the dispite what anyone says...

Now ask yourself why.... in the end run if you dont believe in something, its never going to be possible, while the ones who know it works, will continue using them. Brown's gas has been known about for centurys, and it was'nt practicle until we discovered combustion engines can run entirely on it. Well, now that we have permanent magnet alternators, we can finally generate enough hho

[FreeEnergyNow1]

HHO has been a scam ever since Stan Meyer claim that he made a system that will anyone to run there car off water. Today nobody has every made his plans work and now question if its a scam.

Stan Meyer also claim it free, and yet he needed to patented tomake a buck or two.

[Me102288]

@FreeEnergyNow1 lol that must have been why the goverment covered Brown's gas up 60 years ago, Stan tried to market them the wrong way, thats all.

If you truly think it doesn't work, dont bother trying to disprove it, you seem to already know its still impossible to fly, the world is still flat, and we'll never be able to visit th moon...

[billysgeo]

@Me102288 Where is the PROOF? Where is the SCIENCE? Show me ONE piece of evidence that is not pseudoscience!

[shtirlic76tube]

@billysgeo Searl generator is pseudoscience too? What's your opinion?

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube Yes, the searl generator is pseudoscience too.

[shtirlic76tube]

@a1mint Do you know that in Soviet union Searl generator was tested? They built SEG. It really works.

Even it has a soviet patent. :))) efficiency of SEG is 130% antigravitation effect about 25% it's too low for using.

conclusion of soviet patent bureau: it's effecient only for private purposes.

And you say it's pseudoscience. :)))

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube No, the searl generator does not work because it is a hoax.

Yes, it is pseudoscience.



[billysgeo]

@shtirlic76tube I have no opinion on a PERPETUAL MACHINE. I have never seen one. Have you seen one? Has anyone seen one?...

[shtirlic76tube]

@billysgeo Of course I have seen! The Universe and stars, our planet. water in rivers :)))

I can call it a perpetual machine. And I know one artificial construction which imitates work of soil. It has very very low output but it works and it could be called Perpetual machine. You are so smart so I have no doubt you know about (I don't know how is it English for) Lasarev's Colcar (Kolcar)

[billysgeo]

@shtirlic76tube Searl??? Here you go "In 1991 Anders Heerfordt investigated the claims of Searl concerning the devices that Searl claimed to have shown, as well as verifying claimed witness reports. None of these claims could be verified. Sandberg, as reported through Heerfordt, found a son of Searl "who had seen disks being suspended from wires, so that they could be photographed, but who hadn't seen any demonstration of antigravity or free energy"

[shtirlic76tube]

@billysgeo I've looked for info about Searl and found only soviet patent, which showed 30meters diameter Searl generator and conclusions, but I'm not sure it is real but it looks as scan of real document. So I continue my "investigation" of truth. And I really appreciate your help. thanks

[ISRAELAKAJACOB]

BMW officially announced the Hydrogen 7 the first hydrogen-drive automobile for everyday use. The engine in the Hydrogen 7, capable of running on gasoline or hydrogen, and produces 260 hp. The car will aclt. from 0 to 62.1 mpg in9.5seconds.The hyd. strge tank has a cap. of 17.6 lb of liquid hydrogen, giving the H 7 a range in hydrogen of 125 miles. The gas mode add. 300 mile the engine power torque remain identical regardless of the fuel used.

[Source: BMW, full press release 2007

[shtirlic76tube]

@ISRAELAKAJACOB The difference is great. BMW request to BUY hydrogen. But Mayer produced HHO from the water FOR FREE.

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube Bullshit.

[a1mint]

One single demonstration with credible scientists validating it, on any scientific journal or tv show, and it would change the world in an instant. Every car manufacturer would immediately support this. Lots of government condoned installation shops for after market installs.

One slight problem: that evidence does not exist.

To suggest there is a huge coverup is completely ludicrous, delusional, paranoid, and just plain fucked up.

[shtirlic76tube]

@a1mint Every car manufacturer belongs to oil company.

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube Do you have any evidence of that? Last time I checked is that car companies have their own independent owners and investors. Even you can buy their stock.

[shtirlic76tube]

@a1mint It's a fake. All car companies produce cars which consume as much gas as it posible. Sometimes they produce economic green cars but it's not as efficient as it could be.

Oil petrol is the most needed thing in the present world. Do you really think that owners let you change the world?

Tesla wanted transmit electricity without wires, but Morgan baught copper mine and the good idea was burried. The same fate is for Bedini motor, Searl generator, Mayer cell

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube That's not how it works at all. Car compete for your dollar. Consumer buy whatever works best for them, and fuel economy is part of that. Every time a company comes up with another way of making their cars more efficient it makes them that much more competitive which will make them more profitable each time.

As the price of petrol keeps rising, it will become more viable to use more technology that would otherwise not be worth it.

Turbos, hybrids, batteries, etc.

[shtirlic76tube]

@a1mint advertising makes its own business.

Powerful car means high status. So if you are not chicken you should buy it.

Anyway, even now you can see wars for oil. Iraq, Egypt, Libya. No one fights for hydrogen.

Of course, one day petrol prices will be too high, but as long as it posible it should go on. Banks and Oil companies decide what you should do not you. You are just a puppet in their hands. Mass media washs your brain and you think you have a freedom of choice.

But what you can choose?

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube I agree with the status thing. Men (mostly) just won't buy something that's going to make their penises look small. But with rising fuel prices, the segment of society that opts for fuel economy over power and status, is growing. Especially now, where it seems that we're getting punished every time a bomb goes off in Libya even though we were already punished for it, and even though Saudi Arabia had increased its output to offset Libya's cut output.

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube As for the fight for hydrogen. Hydrogen does not naturally occur on earth in any usable quantities (not talking about it being bonded with oxygen, aka water, but ready to use loose hydrogen atoms). As such, hydrogen on earth is considered an energy carrier and not a source of energy. You need another source of energy to create hydrogen from water, some of which you get back when you bind hydrogen back to oxygen again. So of course there is not any "fight" over hydrogen.

[shtirlic76tube]

@a1mint about fight for hydrogen. I mean fight and competition for hydrogen technologies. As it was in 1957 "battle for space". USA isn't interested in new power sources because they print paper dollar for oil traders.

Russia isn't interested too because it gets dollars for oil.

USA has money to buy patents on new power technologies and stop it.

Mass media makes fool from scientists and oil money still goes in the pocket of bankers and oil companies.

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube Again, hydrogen is not a source of energy, but it is a carrier of energy. I think you have not considered looking at it that way. Stop and think. There isn't any hydrogen around us to tap in to. The hydrogen in water is locked, unless you spend energy releasing it. So, hydrogen is not a source of energy on earth.

Yes, anyone and everyone is interested in a new source of energy, but hydrogen is not a SOURCE of energy.

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube Consider a battery and an electric car. That's a relative low cost way of running a car on something other than gasoline. You charge it at home, and the grid can be fed using efficient energy sources like hydro, wind, solar, nuclear (with its risks of course), etc.

Now trying to use hydrogen as a carrier instead of that battery, currently, is very expensive. Making hydrogen incurs about a 20% loss. Storing hydrogen is difficult. Converting hydrogen to electricity is expensive.

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube You're talking a lot about conspiracies and paranoia. Fortunately, there are enough independent efforts happening that the oil industry can not all control.

Exxon is sitting on some battery technologies (patents), which is pretty disturbing.

But there are all kinds of scientific efforts happening at universities and companies where oil companies have no stake or control at all.

[myleftnutts]

@a1mint yeah mint sureeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!!­!. since their FINANCING,comes from the Very Same people who OWN,the exxon OIL corporation,that is the BANKERS,their gonna be rolling out their own little starship any day now.oh and i guess u forgot about the 2 professors from Utah university in "1989" who stumbled across "Cold Fusion" their careers are going just great now huh???. yeah mint good thing there are NO conspiracies going on,we wouldn't wanna be paranoid.

[a1mint]

@myleftnutts When someone, or a company can figure out a way to compete with current car technologies, that company is going to become very rich.

And yes, you ARE paranoid. And delusional. But guess what? There is no cure for that. You will never in your entire life ever be free from paranoia, the though of people watching over your shoulder. You'll forever be delusional, believing in things that do not exist. There is no cure.

[a1mint]

@shtirlic76tube To confuse matters more, hydrogen can also be extracted from fossil fuels.

[deets101]

@a1mint Thats funny man. They are called hydrocarbons for a reason.

[devinmccloud]

Another moron pushing govt.conspiracy theories.

[Loukas1964]

@devinmccloud The biggest conspiracy around is morons and sheep like you who still believe their governments!!!! WaKe Up!!! Look Up!!! You might see all the toxins they are spraying you in the form of chemtrails....yes you are just another laboratory rat!!!!

[Pipewing]

it takes more energy to break water into oxygen and hydrogen than is given off burning oxygen and hydrogen back into water. That is it, that is all.

[commando7144]

well bob lazar took his wow head a step further his corvette can get 400 miles on 4 scuba tanks filled with hho converted to a hydride which stores more than as if it was in liquid state. it is so safe you could shoot it and it would just smolder like a ciggarette.his system fills the tanks with wind or solar power.and the car can easily convert back to gas on demand.think he`s funded nope

[looser924]

My question is how much energy do you think it takes to produce gasoline?THE MAN POWER,EQUIPTMENT,POWER TO RUN THE DRILLING RIGS AND SO ON....WAKE UP.

[dzgfdg]

@looser924 and how much is produced from oil? hell of a lot more than your ass can support

[Lakensveiser]

Haha, people think energy research is a conspirasy? Jesus, get a hobby^ conspiracy

[a1mint]

The laws of nature dictate that it takes more energy to great HHO than you get from burning it.

The inefficiency is so bad, that any alleged "improving" of the gasoline combustion process, could not possibly overcome this loss.

HHO is a scam. It really really.

I GUARANTEE that the first person that contests this is either:

a) a scammer that sells parts

b) a scammer pretending to be an interested party that really also sells parts

c) a person that does not understand the laws of nature

[firebeetlese]

in fact i agree with the same, but want to add the fact every people i see taking about HHO doesnt have any idea of the words Efficiency watts hp efficiency of the whole process. Just would like to add learn physics before saying hho is the solution to fossil fuels. But i dont mean to discourage any one from experimenting.

[a1mint]

Experimenting with HHO in cars is a waste of time, and should be discouraged for obvious reasons.

The #1 thing to learn for people is the law of conservation of energy. Wikipedia has an excellent page on this.

[ccstevens5]

ok....so please tell me how turning water into hydrogen using low pulsating current with the only biproducts being "clean" water and oxygen is not a trillion times better than burning fossil fuels that pollute the world cause war an iternal drain on our pockets. Last time i checked water was free

[g7txu]

@a1mint Yes, this is correct. The 'Truth' about hydrogen is that it is a volatile gas. The 'Truth' about oxygen is that it promotes combustion. What these HHO wowheads don't grasp is a basic fundamental tenet of Nutonian physics. Energy can neither be destroyed nor created. It can only be converted from one form to another.

[a1mint]

@g7txu Their excuse is that it makes the combustion process "more complete", "more efficient", due to "faster flame speeds".

I've analyze it.

It's not more complete, because 99+% of the gasoline is used. It's pretty much complete already.

More efficient? It can't make up for the much MUCH larger amount of energy spent on creating HHO gas.

There is no evidence that there is an overall gain.

There are excuses, but I can debunk those as well. I know already what those are.

[Zirckull]

@a1mint @a1mint

The laws of nature? If you go back 2 or 3 hundred years before, do you think that someone can believe that flying could be possible? Going to space could be possible? Having complex technology like today? If you assume that everything was discovered, written and booked regarding the laws of nature, you be the same way stop thinking, searching and experiencing... It's not because something has not been define be the *elite* that it can not exist!!...

[a1mint]

@Zirckull People not being able to fly way back when was never a law of nature. Visionaries knew all along that one day people would fly. It was only a matter of time.

The laws of nature are a completely different thing altogether. The law of the conservation of energy for one is very clearly understood, and noone in their right mind thinks that this is only a temporary state, something that would be "overcome" one day. Energy can not be created or destroyed - and that, really, is just that.

[a1mint]

Naming your profile after a complete and utter super grand master overlord scam artist is a GREAT way of making damn well sure noone will take you serious, except ignorant gullible fools. Are those your customers?

[a1mint]

But if your actual name is what your profile suggest, then I stand corrected.

[frosty9595]

Fuel cells are getting cheep enough that it could be possible soon.

[a1mint]

First of all, a fuel cell is an electrochemical cell that converts a source fuel into an electrical current and water.

The term "fuel cell" is abused and misused by the HHO scamdustry.

Even if one of those electrolyzers were free, there wouldn't be any benefit whatsoever, because fundamentally, they can not increase mpg, because you can not break the laws of nature.

[SionMorel]

There is already a car which runs on H2O and it works using the same technology from hydrogen fuel cells. Just do a search with the words 'Japan' '100% H2O Car' and you should find it

[icecoldpepper88]

Here's a challenge, everyone who has said that this system does not break any rules of physics or chemistry, then please show how you came to that conclusion. This means a formula of some sort showing the energy involved with the reactants and products. If you are saying these things and cannot do this, then you are not qualified to say that it works.

[juggernautxtr]

make it at home store it in a tank and fill your car from that, probly heat your water and house at the same time.

[TheAdler83]

a1mint is correct. HHO car systems are a scam. To generate enough hydrogen to run an engine is not possible using 12 volts which is the normal vehicle electrical system voltage. If these systems worked why does everyone who properly tests them supposedly lie and say that they don't work? That just does not make any sense at all, especially if we're all about saving money and conserving fuel usage. I don't believe for a minute either that some conspiracy exists between the govt and oil companies!

[SionMorel]

Do you really believe that the war in Iraq was about terrorism or about taking more oil from the middle east? Don't be so naive

[peppoj]

O.K, you all probably know this, but i think it is worth mentioning.

I think that one of the reasons why the hydrogen fuel cell is not mainstream (that is, the one that turns hydrogen into electricity for an electric engine) is the material cost. Where the hell are we suppose to get all of that platinum?? ;D

[a1mint]

HHO car systems == scam

[a1mint]

Yes, it *IS* a scam.

Noone in the entire world has ever proven there is a gain in mpg.

The only scientific evidence that exists is that it DECREASES mpg.

When you analyze how it is supposed to work, you see that fundamentally there can not be any gain.

If you wish to contest this FACT, you can start by looking a the video I'm mirroring.

[ccstevens5]

how can it be a scam if you eliminate the cost of buy gas?????????????? Stan Meyers was a genius your a fool...or a nazi control nwo government agent. lol

[a1mint]

@ccstevens5

So, if you don't use gas, then what is the source of energy then?

Perhaps you're one of those delusional idiots that was Stan's target audience, who believed in perpetual motion and other completely wacky schemes.

[taledarkside]

@ccstevens5

because HHO doesn't work, thats why its a scam.

Especially the guy selling the 100 dollar kit which is only worth 10 dollars.

[QuarkToo]

RE-ELECT NOBODY and get involved in the primary election. That is where they hack the election. After that, they could care less who you vote for since they are all blackmailed.

[theoneagain]

imagine a world where your energy is free

. HYdrogen from water from on the fly systems is calle free energy and it is TAX FREE !!! IMAGINE a system that could deliver just enough on the fly to power evry vehicle on the road WOW !!!

[Konicava]

Cool. (like Henry David Thoreau)

but dont worry, internet is already destroying the television (the first mass comunication system in all contries), soon or latter we will pay out taxes to the google corporation.

Remmember Adam Smith, monopolization is no healthy for the economy.

[SaintSkyler]

If there is a net loss in energy, then how is it that these homegrown hybrids are running increased Gas Milage without killing the battery? I'm going to do an oil/tuneup on my civic, film 3 tanks stock, then, I'm going to buy one ("HHO" Cell) from Vada, then film the the unboxing, install, operation and again, 3 gas mileage tests. I'm genuinely interested in the truth and will not take it's sucess or failure personal. Subscribe! It'll be within a couple of months or so, hopefully.

[robzub]

Those of you who say it does not work. Have you ever tried to build one? Or are you kust buying the BS we have been taught. I have engineers tell me all the time that it won't work but then I say, have you tried it. The answer is no. I show them what I am doing and they are just amazed at the results. Read what the naysayers write then run an experiment yourself. The first thing to hit your brain is

that something is wrong with what you have been told. Try it before you dis this technology.

[ckpeltomaa]

Everyone wins with this technology, even people who run the planet. No technology will succeed if we get into an us vs them mentality.

[bogdy72000]

you would be amazed only to hear how loud it pops when you hold fire near the hho bubbles ((: I know I was

[kderules]

HHO gas 2 hydrogen one oxygen. H2O gas 2 hydrogen one oxygen. Its called steam. this does not work imo but you will learn how to boil water.

[WORLDREIGN]

You obviously do not know how atoms work. Hydrogen is EXPLOSIVE and oxyges in needed for anything to burn. Ptrotechnics use a fuel, and a OXIDISER. In this case, when the atoms are seporated from their molecule, the hydrogen is the "fuel" and the oxygen is the oxidiser. Take a 9 vold connected to two pencil wires in salt water, and light the gass. Trust me, it's not steam.

[BlackDogSociety]

Here are a couple of things you should know, stream is water vapor which is still water and HHO is actually two separate gases H2 and O2. Stream does not ignite but HHO ignites violently. You should really do a little research about hydrogen and its potential as a fuel source.

[somedudeinva]

Nobody doubts that hydrogen burns. What you call "HHO" igniting is hydrogen igniting. Oxygen is cogenerated, but for the love of CHRIST... there is no such thing as "HHO" except for water.

[BlackDogSociety]

HHO is a term used to represent H2 and O2 gases separated through electrolysis. You can call it what you will but it's still H2 and O2. Oh and you ought to look it up Hydrogen like many other fuels needs Oxygen to burn...

[somedudeinva]

I never suggested hydrogen doesn't need oxygen to burn. I said that it is hydrogen, not "HHO" that is igniting.

"HHO" is a term created by people on the internet. Seriously. Scientists absolutely never use it because it's completely misleading. Air is 78% nitrogen and 21% oxygen.. so if we neglect the trace gases and round that to 80:20 (i.e. 4:1) then we could call air NNNNO. That would be the same logic but mean scientifically, totally, incorrect. Sound stupid to be breating NNNNO?

[BlackDogSociety]

No it is the Hydrogen AND the Oxygen that ignites and since HHO is a term used by many to express the gas produced by electrolysis then saying HHO ignites is correct. HHO may be not be a scientific term but nonetheless it is a commonly used term.

[somedudeinva]

It's only common on youtube/internet. No scientist calls it that.

I am one. I know hundreds of other scientists. They don't call it that. It's an internet term for people who don't know any better.

[BlackDogSociety]

Just for accuracy sake what is the scientific name for what we lay people call HHO? I've heard (seen) it called by many different names, for my own edification can you tell me which one is correct?

[somedudeinva]

It is hydrogen and oxygen in a 2:1 stoichiometric ratio.

[BlackDogSociety]

Oh come on, you mean to tell me that is the best the scientific community can do? No wonder we lay people have to make up our own names for it. Use of this gas has been around a long time, by now it should have a scientific name for clarity. I think Hydroxy Gas is probably most fitting therefore this is what I will call it from now on.

[somedudeinva]

Why would you need a scientific name for two things mixed together? If I take salt and pepper and mix them together, are they something else? Or are they just salt and pepper?

To call it "HHO" is entirely misleading. That is expressing the empiral formula of the mixture as if it is a chemical compound, HHO, which it is not.

"Hydroxyl" is an H-O• radial and is something altogether different. Hydroxy refers to -OH as a substructure.

[BlackDogSociety]

Well we would need some way of expressing the mixture of gases, HHO may not be scientifically correct but it is a way to express Hydroxy Gas.

Actually I believe there is at least 1 mixture of gases that science and lay people have the same name for, it's called AIR, I believe you mentioned that earlier. Then there's OXY-ACETYLENE which is also a term used by many to describe a mixture.

Maybe we should call Hydroxy Gas OXY-HYDROGEN instead. Would that be better?

[somedudeinva]

I'm not saying trivial names for gas mixtures don't exist. But I would never call oxy-acetylene CCHHHHOO.

I don't care what you chose to call it really. But understand that from a scientific standpoint HHO is beyond laughable and is completely misleading. At least oxy-acetylene makes sense.

[BlackDogSociety]

Ok fair enough. When I get my Oxy-hydrogen generator built and start posting my results from tests I plan on running I won't call it HHO. Thanks for the dialog about this, Take care...

[somedudeinva]

Sorry if you think I'm being a dick - it's just that so much scientific BS surrounds this topic it gets irritating to educated scientists. Have fun.

[BTPossum]

You just invented 'Sapper'.

[RayShafft]

Since you think this is a joke, you should Google the HHOgames. Takes place next week, and a 9 bay HHO installation garage is opening in Clearwater, FL in December. People wouldn't waste their money or reputations on that if it wasn't true. Search it!!!

[noimw]

Key word being GAMES.

"People wouldn't waste their money or reputations on that if it wasn't true."

The scams are betting on it.

FACT: Hydrogen from electrolytes takes more power than the hydrogen is worth.

Get over it.

[somedudeinva]

Whoa dude. Slow down. Are you sure it's not just Bush and Saudi Arabia paying you off?

I know.... it's sad. To those who say they work: show me that you actually get more power than you consume. Until then.....

[noimw]

FACT: Hydrogen will work as a fuel for a vehicle.

BUT not from electrolysis on the vehicle. Here is why.

EXAMPLE: Lets say you are producing 1 liter of HHO

per minute. That is Almost enough to fire 4 cylinders one

time. A V8 engine running at 2000 RPM fires 4,000 cylinders

per minute. That's 4/4000 or 1/1000 of the fuel needed to run

the engine per min. That is 1 part hydrogen to 999 parts gasoline.

Continued :

[noimw]

Now we have to subtract the HP the alternator pulled from the

engine to generate the current needed to make the Hydrogen.

Lets just say it takes about 6 amps to make 1 liter per minute.

or 12 amps to make 2 liters per minute. Scale it up to what ever

you want. But.....

FACT: It will always take more power to make the hydrogen then

the hydrogen will give back, without Exception.

[brownlog86]

you just ruined my day.

[papatronix]

I kinda see your point... y do car companies build such expensive Hydrogen cars with much more complicated fuel cell setups????? making them so expensive to build and reproduce... maybe to show the common people that Hydrogen cars can be made but are 2 expensive to reproduce so that they put their attention in other alternatives???

[OliverKlohzoff]

How come there are 100 guys trying to sell you plans to make your own HHO Gas Generator yet none of them sell a working premade Generator? Pretty obvious......... SCAM

[MentorOfMinos]

Reason is because every car model has a slightly different set up, so it's hard to standardize a kit. My friend just HHO'd an old CR-V and doubled its horsepower. They're working on dodging the O2 sensor so they can up the gas mileage.

Plus, it's probably illegal to sell the finished product and claim it can do anything, kinda like how it's illegal to market alkaline water as a cure for cancer...because the AMA says so, not because it doesn't work. Go ahead and be duped by the government though

[gschjetne]

Don't defend these lowlife scammers!

[cinammot]

you have not proved a thing, I did this experiment in chemistry class in 1969, what is your actual application.........?

[cinammot]

you dumbshit bastard, what is this about? you really are wasting our time. SHOW ME SOMETHING OTHER THAN HYDOGEN GENERATORS BUBBLING. How about real cars running on hydrogen generators, with some real supporting data................

[planmix]

YOU are the dumbshit bastard because you are

wasting your time by seeing videos about something that you have decided and believed that it does not exist.

I'm setting questions and you could tell your opinion using better language.

[Audi2000t]

exccellent video.

[roger44332]

The person who can massproduce a safe hho generator that works will get rich. I wish I was an engineer; to you engineers out there -- please start building hho generators that we can purchase and then have installed to run in our cars.

[Audi2000t]

problem is roger44332, it may attract good publicity but how about the type of attention with government or most likely major oil campanies - others have invented these things before it is definatley possible though there was a documentary on utube about this guy who was inventing them and was visited by amany oil companies to keep his mouth shut..

[b0utch]

even if you need electricity to produce HHO... look at how much energy a gas engine wast just from unused heat... how about we use that heat to power an alternator to produce HHO... just an idea... actual engine are total crap low efficiency and they like it that way!!

[WORLDREIGN]

I agree. But thats near impossible.

[andesam]

hho isnt really a energy source (its what we call a "energy transporter"), because you need a lot of electrisity to produce it from water. more energy than you get from the hho gas itself. but if you can make clean electrisity you can make clean hho gas to fill on you car.. i guess.

[MentorOfMinos]

This is true of all reactions or chemical pathways, including almost all processes in the human metabolic pathway. But we have spiffy things called ENZYMES that act as CATALYSTS to drastically reduce the activation energy of organic reactions so we can live. Same thing works with HHO: you use a catalyst to dramatically lower the energy input required to electrolyze the water. The water splits easily and then burns at full capacity to give MORE energy OUT than you put IN.

[beyondhelp00]

No it doesn't. If you think it does - prove it, because you will not be able to.

I would suggest you try to by the following method:

Power source > HHO > Fuel cell > Current measurement.

Show me that more power is going out than going in, if not go away and stop talking nonsense. No one has done it and no one ever will.

Also catalysts simply speed a reaction up, this does not mean it takes less energy for the reaction to carry complete.

[h2opower]

You got that right! If Dr. Dingel or Stanley Meyer type of technology gets out all at once we could see power companies going bust world wide, and oil usage cut by 2/3 or more. They are defenetly not going out quitely. Killing more than 1 million in wars for oil as I type.

It all has too do with water's abilities, the self ionazation of water is where this thechnology comes into play, it is not at all breaking the rules of physics, not even bending them, but "they" don't want you to know that.

[rodeobadger]

Nice video and Oh so true.