dechha, i get worried whenever you have to explain why WotM are wrong, cus it's like you have to because RRS aren't going to. They should! (i'm hoping they do...)
And the instincts that allowed humans to evolve to this point in time (as their equivalents in every animal have) are meaningless? Logic and the basic human instincts dictate that one helps support other humans because one human alone is far less likely to survive than many socially cooperative humans following a common set of instncts would be. It's like a "Soul Shampoo" for the the theists, "Rinse, Lather, Repeat" - "Sin, get forgiveness, repeat."
National Geographic is not a peer-reviewed magazine, and is not the "scientific community". It's ironic that they use this example, when it clearly STILL fools them.
Holy shit. How many times, since you joined YouTube, did you repeat ''there are so many transitional fossils etc.''? It seems as if in every second video it is said because of a Creationist dipshit.
"Completely fooled the worldwide scientific community"
O rly?
Every scientist who examined archeoraptor noted that it was a composite piece. It was instantly exposed as a fake in peer review and was rejected by both nature and science. It was never published in any scientific magazine, only the popular press fell for it.
The reason why christianity is so oposed evolution is that it pretty mush disproves the garden of eden, adam and eve, but most importantly, original sin.
and if there was no original sin there would be no reason for jesus to come back and die for that sin.
To mush of christianitys income is based of jesus and original sin. of course they want it nott to be true.
So no, Christianity and evolution doesnt go togehter.
Yeah, remember that Micheal Jackson documentary? In 2003 he was voted the 5th worst Briton in a TV poll. Luckily we managed to export him to the US. Enjoy.
Creationists seem to break natural selection down into two catagories. Either evolution is blind and therefore cannot work, or that it is statistically improbable to that the world today evolved from the world of yesterday... if that makes any sense. I'm trying and failing to say that they seem to start with the answer and try to derive the question, which is impossible.
We don't just rely on natural selection to evolve. Since we now understand how natural selection works, we use algorithms based on it to design better circuit pcb's and microchips. Natural selection is far far far from chance or random events.Natural selection is the quickest route to get from something that doesn't quite work to something that works very well in as short a time as possible.More importantly it does this without any knowledge of the future,a fact creationists seem to totally miss
dechha, i get worried whenever you have to explain why WotM are wrong, cus it's like you have to because RRS aren't going to. They should! (i'm hoping they do...)
Larwick 3 years ago
"Natural selection bends random chance over the hood of its car and makes random chance its bitch."
For more information about natural selection's bitch, contact the Canadian wildlife service in Ottowa
technologysucks 3 years ago
The moderator is playing both sides to keep the discussion going. Don't be so hard on him! :p
I cant wait to hear the RRS destroy Kirks strawman.
Brianswers 3 years ago
Great video! Esp. the part about the concept of large numbers not fitting into creationists' minds! LOL! :D :D :D
neowondertwilight 3 years ago
Kingdom, phylum, class, order, family, genus, species...nope-don't see the word "kind" in there. ;)
phenixwryter 3 years ago 2
And the instincts that allowed humans to evolve to this point in time (as their equivalents in every animal have) are meaningless? Logic and the basic human instincts dictate that one helps support other humans because one human alone is far less likely to survive than many socially cooperative humans following a common set of instncts would be. It's like a "Soul Shampoo" for the the theists, "Rinse, Lather, Repeat" - "Sin, get forgiveness, repeat."
RyuDarragh 3 years ago
"Blind faith is an ironic gift to the creator of human intelligence".
andagod 3 years ago 2
National Geographic is not a peer-reviewed magazine, and is not the "scientific community". It's ironic that they use this example, when it clearly STILL fools them.
poorkinghaggard 3 years ago
You can do what you want if not for God!?
What a cunt.
kff 3 years ago
@ dechha1981
"Natural Selection bends random chance over the hood of it's car and makes random chance his bitch"
I've never, EVER heard a better point about this "random chance" - crap :D
You are my hero of the day!
amateurevolutionist 3 years ago 3
Holy shit. How many times, since you joined YouTube, did you repeat ''there are so many transitional fossils etc.''? It seems as if in every second video it is said because of a Creationist dipshit.
TwoRavingPsychopaths 3 years ago 2
"Completely fooled the worldwide scientific community"
O rly?
Every scientist who examined archeoraptor noted that it was a composite piece. It was instantly exposed as a fake in peer review and was rejected by both nature and science. It was never published in any scientific magazine, only the popular press fell for it.
Xorinite 3 years ago 2
Excellent point, is it not always the case that it is science that exposes the fraud, not creationists?
kff 3 years ago 2
The reason why christianity is so oposed evolution is that it pretty mush disproves the garden of eden, adam and eve, but most importantly, original sin.
and if there was no original sin there would be no reason for jesus to come back and die for that sin.
To mush of christianitys income is based of jesus and original sin. of course they want it nott to be true.
So no, Christianity and evolution doesnt go togehter.
FurieMan 3 years ago 2
LOL, " Bends it over the hood of a car, and makes random chance its bitch"
Thanks for the vids
ragetony 3 years ago
I wouldn't call these videos a debunking as much as a commentary or reinforcement of RRS's perspectives.
But your commentary and or reinforcement of their perspectives is right on point.
FreePrometheus 3 years ago
moderator = douche rocket
C0ct0pus 3 years ago 2
Yeah, remember that Micheal Jackson documentary? In 2003 he was voted the 5th worst Briton in a TV poll. Luckily we managed to export him to the US. Enjoy.
dave28lax 3 years ago
thanks a bunch...is it too late for a refund?
C0ct0pus 3 years ago 2
Kirk kept rubbing his nose. He was really nervous.
WeedGreenPowerRanger 3 years ago
Sorry Dechha, i'm not as articulate as you. My statements will probably look like gibberish lol
th3d3wd3r 3 years ago
Creationists seem to break natural selection down into two catagories. Either evolution is blind and therefore cannot work, or that it is statistically improbable to that the world today evolved from the world of yesterday... if that makes any sense. I'm trying and failing to say that they seem to start with the answer and try to derive the question, which is impossible.
th3d3wd3r 3 years ago
We don't just rely on natural selection to evolve. Since we now understand how natural selection works, we use algorithms based on it to design better circuit pcb's and microchips. Natural selection is far far far from chance or random events.Natural selection is the quickest route to get from something that doesn't quite work to something that works very well in as short a time as possible.More importantly it does this without any knowledge of the future,a fact creationists seem to totally miss
th3d3wd3r 3 years ago
That lady from RRS really has an annoying, whiney voice. I'm on her side, but I wish she'd shut up.
Just get to the Crocoduck, Kirk.
dave28lax 3 years ago
Yay part 7! You rule Dechna :P
TheSandreGuy 3 years ago