Added: 1 year ago
From: torahtimes
Views: 176
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (8)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • So then you are admitting to the Catholic view. That is also heresy, and it is self evident that no one is inwardly perfect. : But now apart from the norm, a justice¹ of the Almĩghty is made visible, being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets, 22 that is, the justice¹ of the Almĩghty, through the faithfulnessⁿ of Yẽshua, the Mẽssiah, unto all those giving support to him; for there is no distinction (Rom 3:21)

  • Righteouness is not transferred to an account we are made righteous by the Nature of new birth. Reformers hate the word infused because Catholics used it for grace to begin the path of justification.No where in my comment did I mention transferrance. But now the righteousness of God apart from law is revealed being wittnessed by the law and prophets. The righteousness of God is in His Nature and His Nature in Christ is given to us. But the law is not what Christ satisfied but all of God's Nature

  • Re: polopowers1....positive righteousness cannot be transferred to the account of the sinner such that the sinner is thereby acquitted. That would be a perversion of justice. The Scripture calls it an abomination. Ex 23:7; Prov. 17:15. Deut. 25:1. The reformers doctrine on this was false doctrine. The unchained bible was responsible for the reformation...not the reformers who falsely take credit in the eyes of many.

  • The Nature of God can only be satisfied by the perfect Virtue of God Himself for righteousness imputed justice done.Christ is the exact Virtue of God exceeding justice of law. God was satisfied in Christ not only for satisfaction of law broken but the exceeding Character of God after law is satisfied. Melchesidek stands before God's perpetual Virtues after law and punishment,He perpetually satisfys God's exceeding righteousness apart from law. The Justice of God is not equal to law satisfied.

  • In the 4th case the defendant asking for mercy is repentant. He declares he wants to change. That is what disposes the judge to show mercy in the 4th case-- because he truly wants to forsake sin. Now, of course anyone truly repentant and shown mercy would be willing to show mercy to anyone else truly repentant and seeking mercy. If someone were unwilling to show mercy to the truly repentant, then that would only show that they understood nothing about salvation.

  • This was my first video. Yes, showing mercy to others would be part of repentance, but just understanding the good news the right way is an awknowledgement of mercy. It just needs to be practiced on others, especially when they sin in ignorance of the Torah, but still have a commitment to Yeshua.

  • MERCY, THE COUNTERWEIGHT...

    Can only be applied IF THE DEFENDANT PRACTICED MERCY TOWARD OTHERS within Ones Life aka Yahshuah (Jesus) saying...

    "SHOULD (YOU) HAVE HAD MERCY ON (YOUR FELLOW), THE SAME WAY THAT (I) HAD MERCY ON YOU? - Matt 18:33

    Blessed are THE MERCIFUL, for THEY SHALL RECEIVE mercy. - Matt 5:7

    If The Defendants Life bore NO MERCY IN THE GIVING then The Burdensome Stone remains... MERCY received GIVES LIFE back FREELY!

    IN HEAVEN as ON EARTH is THE MEASUREMENT OF Yah' JUDGMENT!

  • Awesome Video! Very well explained! Please post more :)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more