Those explosions were caused by pressure of the towers falling. It's not fair to post this along with demolition footage. Two completely different scenarios
@Fuckthehaloseries Why don't tell @12Weasel that? He is the one starting Shit with me for no reason. I was talking to someone else and then he jumped in and started be rude and offensive towards me. Tell @12Weasel to shut the Fuck up not me.
@12Weasel Fuck you Bitch! Stupid Fucking Son of a Bitch!! You are so stupid and ignorant. Don't Fuck with me Mother Fucker!! You stupid Fucking Son of a Bitch!! Fuck you!!
@12Weasel You need to shut your Bitch Ass up and stop talking BullShit you stupid Ass Mother Fucker!! Who the Hell do you think you're talking to like that? You better watch who you are talking like that you stupid Son Of A Bitch!! Fucking Bitch Ass Mother Fucker!! Fuck you Bitch!
Wake up and think for yourselves. Look at the videos, take it in and think about it before immediately disregarding it as a conspiracy. If you can seriously read 9/11 Commission/NIST/FEMA/Silverstein reports and not have ANY questions, something is seriously wrong with you. They contradict each other, and simply do not add up to what you can visually see. Stop being so naïve, the Gov. has used false flag operations before, this is not anything new. Does anyone remember how/why we invaded Vietnam
@MrColts420 The Twin Towers disintigrated floor by floor and turned into dust and covered the streets of Lower Manhattan. 2 airplanes did not bring these towers down. They had to have used explosives to turn those skyscrapers into dust. Fire or severe damage alone could not bring down a huge skyscraper like the World Trade Center. There has to be further investigation to the events of 9/11.
Fire cannot cause such precise damage, as to take out each core/perimeter column, sequentially in the exact time/place needed to allow such a symmetrical, identical, free-fall “collapse” of two steel framed building. And then there is WTC7, which raises the most questions. 47 stories completely gone in six seconds, which NIST even admitted free fall. How is this possible?
Look at the damn buildings so called "collapse." They are completely gone in 10 seconds. They are hit at differ spots, at differ angles, yet they still both "collapse" in the same exact manner. How is that possible without the help of something? The fires were localized at the top of the building, so how are the thousands of tons of untouched steel below jeopardized, as to allow a free fall speed "collapse?" There is no resistance from the structure, the buildings gain momentum
@MrColts420 That is the question that alot of people can't answer. People say that the collapse started at the impact point where the airplanes hit the buildings. But it was only the top floors of the Twin Towers that were damaged by the impact of 767 jet airplanes. The rest of the floors above the impact zone were perfectly fine. It was only the top part of the World Trade Center that was severly damaged. 9/11 was an inside job.
Rolling over and accepting a blatant lie is complete disrespect to who lost their live on 911 and to ALL those soldiers continuing to die in Iraq/Afghanistan. Why are they still there? Remember we were supposed to be finding Bin Laden. It’s been 10 years, billions upon billions of dollars later, and we still can’t find him, why?
False Flag Op, used as justification to invade…
The buildings don't collapse, they are clearly disintegrating floor-by-floor before your own eyes
@MrColts420 Osama Bin Laden will never be found you know why? Because he is not responsible for 9/11. Alot of people still don't get the picture. Those 19 hijackers that were from Saudi Arabia in the Middle East were not on those 4 airplanes that were hijacked on 9/11. What kind of an investigation were the 9/11 Commission Report doing? The most important thing that needs further investigaion is building 7.
people, the builders of the twin towers planned the WTC so they would fall downwards like that and the terrorists knew where to hit the building so that all the right conditions would deteriorate the structure a certain way. So yes, it WAS planned. I doubt there were bombs... But if there were, it doesnt matter anyways, it still happened due to some smelly fucking middle eastern fuckers. FUCK THEM.
I think bombs were on the wtc too many people said that because if yu noticed even before plane hit the wtc it blew up R.I.P ALL THOSE INOCENT PEOPLE IN THE WTC you was all brave x
Hers one thing no one realized 93 was supposed to hit the white house but it didn't and nothing went off. Plus with my own two goddamn eyes I saw those towers get hit from a plane. I was 6 when I saw it and i'll never forget. I was there in the streets. So those saying it was a goddamn bomb or cover up FUCK YOU because I'm tired of this. You weren't there shut up and listen to those that survived. Saying it was a cover up is a middle finger to New York, USA, and the victims ofthis tragedylike me
I think eco-terrorists were responsible for 9/11. They knew that the resulting invasion of Iraq would drive up oil and gas prices and cause America's dependence on foreign oil to become even more evident that it already was, leading to a green technology revolution and the end of the fossil fuel era. You damned dirty hippies can rot in hell, God bless the USA!
@GlassesInMyEyeball LOL are you a payed shill....na can't be even they would make up a better story than that LOL LOL LOL USA is highjacked. They are coming for americans now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
What I find absolutely hilarious is how so many ignorant people claim "millions we're killed in the name of Christianity, remember the inquisition?" So many people have such little knowledge about the historical facts it's ridiculous!
Less than 3,000 people were killed during the Spanish Inquisition. Over almost 400 years less people were killed in this than 5 hours at the World Trade Center. Anything to promote genocide and minimize their agenda I guess.
ow the fuck could they plant 1000s of tons of thermite into a building without anyone noticing, simple answer, they couldnt!!! To collapse buildings the size of twin towers would require huge amounts of explosives secretly installed, plus you always demolish buildings form the bottom not the top! and why wouldnt it go straight down? the building the size of that is always more likely to go straight down rather than any other way!
how the fuck could they plant 1000s of tons of thermite into a building without anyone noticing, simple answer, they couldnt!!! To collapse buildings the size of twin towers would require huge amounts of explosives secretly installed, plus you always demolish buildings form the bottom not the top! and why wouldnt it go straight down? the building the size of that is always more likely to go straight down rather than any other way!
Who knows...with all the technology we have This could have been planned.....then the demolition could have been put there before...who knows? I doubt a tower could fall like that so clean like... if a plane struck into it and didnt lopside backwards....then why would it go straight down?....metal melting? true....but It wouldnt be so straight down like that...it could have fell backwards also
also......do you think the policemen....or the firefighter can go upstairs and put the bombs near to the destruction site?? really...you're stupid..men..really....
why taht people think that?? !!! ARE YOU STUPID??? the smoke that go out of the floor is because the up floor go down and throw the smoke outside!! IT'S EASY!! do you really think that?? so stupid men..sooooo stupid....very eassy..!!
So if you're gonna try and "prove" that the World Trade Center was demolished. Why would you show demolitions before showing the collapse that go *bang bang bang bang* then collapse, then you get to the WTC collapse and all you hear is *ssssssssssssssssszzzzzzzzzz* not smart.
So, uh, do you think that Nist, Mit, Nypd, Nsa, Cia, Fbi and Popular Mechanics (to name a few) were in on the conspiracy? The fact is all of these organizations investigated 911 and came to conclusions about the collapse of the Twin Towers......none of them mention anything about a controlled demolition bringing down the towers. Please let me know when you find FACTUAL PROOF of your.....uh.....THEORY?
@tickyul Why the hell would they speak up? Either they were involved, or in fear that they'd get picked off. Want some interesting facts? Why did the WTC plummet STRAIGHT down from a plane that crashed around the 60th floor!
@tickyul nist is incomplete, Nypd, says there were explosions, Popular Mechanics repeats the "official story" Do you only believe what you read ? OR do you believe your eyes? Watch the corners of the building.. no natural collapse here. Actual proof, look at the video of them coming down.. if you dont see and hear explosions your brain washed.
@katlovesall Yeah, I guess the 3 year deatailed analysis of 9-11 by Nist means nothing to some people. I base my opinions on the best available data, so far, the conspiracy people have been far from impressive. Popular Mechanics consulted with many experts, they do not buy into any conspiracy theories. I do not even want to rehash the collapse, you can consult with Rosie O'Dumbbell on that one.
dont believe your tv. dont believe the shit they force down your throats. read between the lines. money is the biggest motivator known to man.
oskarcowboy, micheal jacksons death is now being investigated as a homicide. his latest single "this is it" is punted to be his HIGHEST ever selling single over thriller and billy jean. NOW you try and convince me thats not a whole load of shit.
raskitbob is exactly right. the president is merely a puppet controlled by a team of advisors and marketers. why was it that at the exact same time of the attack, the US airforce was conducting practice operations of the exact same scenarios unfolding. resulting in mass confusion in the air and on ground in air traffic control towers.
how else do you start a war over natural resources? simply by making the whole world believe someone else is the culprit and justice must prevail.
and ive also seen the footage of the pentagon and there is no way there was a boeing 747 flying into more like an american missile it was the presidents idea whether u think it or not there are higher people than the president in the government the president is just the face of america it wudnt cross ne1s minds tht a dumbass like bush wud order this to
i completely agree with domtzj ive seen a lot of footage of the wtc coming down and u can see little explosions befor the collapsing gets to tht point and as the new york chief of fire sed "it was like boom boom boom boom
Firstly, if you're American and your blind patriotism does not allow you to process these images unbiasedly don't bother commenting. It's understandable when something bad happens, you blame someone. The Black/Muslim/Jewish scapegoat.
Secondly there is no available footage of the attack to the Pentagon showing any aircraft shaped objects. Yet claims were made a 757 commercial plane left a "gapping hole" in the West Block. It was not wide enough to fit a 757's wingspan.
ooo yeah that makes sense the president was in the white house when it came to him "I WANT TO KILL HUNDREDS OF AMERICANS YEAH!" i know he was a dumb ass but he wasn't some crazy dumb ass so when you say educate ourselves ask yourself this "why would Americans kill millions of citizens then spend millions on repairing the damage then just empty the building and then destroy it?" dumb ass
how dumb are you? in every other video of demolitions the building comes down in one piece and being destroyed at the bottom when hitting the ground, when the twin towers fall, they collapse from top to bottom, with every floor hitting the next, that way it would be impossible for it to start falling to the side, it looks totaly different, you are just proving you are wrong by posting this video
Are people still that dense to STILL THINK IT WAS TERRORISTS, Come on 4 fuk sake how can people be so idiotically spasticated to watch the footage but not see it. Really pull that no brained head out ur ass and wipe that shit out ur eyes then maybe you will be able to see for once, oh yeh giv ur mouth a little wipe as well cause ur talkin shit to, 911=IiNnSsIiDdEe JjOoBb, INSIDE JOB, IiNnSsIiDdEe JjOoBb=Thousands of dumbass idiots with no common sense=doom for mankind.
9/11 was all planned out ppl especially americans should stop blaming muslims and start looking closer to home as it was their lovely G.Bush that planned it all !
people are itiotes, wtc 7 was hit by one of the buildings debree as it came down, hitting the weak structure, causing it to COLLAPSE, they only way i'll beleive this theory is when the republicans admit they were behind the tower attacks, he ordered saudi arabians to take hold of the planes and smash them into the top of the building and in the morning, when there isn't many people, the top will be damaged, 500 or so people killed, but instead, the buildings collapsed 3,000 killed, all for oil!
this is not true. I'm sorry, but those explosions are because of the pressure from the top of the building collapsing.
In the firefighters documentary you also see that when the plane hits the building, the pressure is so big that the explosion comes through an elevator shaft and blows out all the windows on the ground floor
"On a normal demolition it starts at the bottom and the top fals down after the bottom blows up. But on the WTC's it starts from the top and works its way down."
Because it was supposed to, dummy. This was a mind-fuck operation. It was supposed to be traumatic to cause nationwide PTSD and obsequiousness to the criminal government. Now they've shredded the Constitution and all of you either don't care or support it because of Islamic terrorism. It's almost too unbelievable to be true.
Look closely at the collapsing. On a normal demolition it starts at the bottom and the top fals down after the bottom blows up. But on the WTC's it starts from the top and works its way down.
I'm sorry but if this really did happen and it was really planned the main question is WHY? WHY did the governement let 2,669 people die? for Money? for Media purposes? I have no idea...this tradgedy is wrong - whether it was done with a plane or a controlled demolition - Evil...
people are just to dumb...and you dont need proof... They say oh the terrorist make the wtc fall ..yeah right so YOUR TERRORIST set the fire in the wtc 7 too? thats what you mean?
WTC 7 was hit when one of the tallest buildings in the world fell onto it. It's not hard to understand, for any rational person, how that could cause some serious damage.
Okay am I really the only one who noticed that every one of the CDs shown here started from the ground up? None of them were on fire and none of them were hit by a plane. This video proves nothing but the desperation of conspirecy nuts.
WTC7 started at the bottom, just like other CDs. WTC7 was not hit by a plane. It was damaged by debris from the North Tower. It had several fires on a few floors. That said, if WTC7 had suffered a partial or progressive collapse there would be little debate. The mystery is the MANNER of WTC7's collapse, not that it did collapse.
Challenge: find a building anything like WTC7 that collapsed anything like WTC7 did, due to anything but a CD. War, bombs, fire, earthquake, volcano, tornado...
You can't bring down some of the tallest buildings in the world using traditional CD, which relies on dropping the building into its base. Instead, the Twin Towers were dropped using top-down CD. You can find examples of this on YouTube.
true, they say it happened cuz of the "fires" it was burning...but the fires were 2 small to cause any dmg, you can search "WTC 7 BBC" and watch the first video.
Anyone who has worked construction or been in a multi story building knows that they are very well sealed i.e. dont "breathe". The puffs you saw were the walls and windows blowing out of the side of the building from the weight and accompanying air pressure of x-teen stories compressing the air in what amounts to an enclosed tube. The puffs are weakspots in the exterior. Like a straw with a hole in it the air escapes wherever it can most easily. Stop thinking with emotions and use your brains.
wildbuzz666 what a great montage. It plainly shows the actual demolitions of other buildings, and compares them to the north and south towers, and bldg 7, and you can plainly see the explosive squibs from the bombs that were belted all around up and down the buildings. And those poor people in them had NO idea our own people were killing them. The last hing my friend in the north said to me was "South just went down, the bombs are working in this one now. I am going to die. I love you". then....
Mate, you dont even know what your saying....its like a slap in the face to the victims of 9/11. They couldnt find the black box because the fire burning in the buildings were over 1000 degrees. And besides they did find the black box on the plane that hit in Pensyllvania and 9/11 was not a cover up, your probabbly some middle aged fat nerdy little bitch and still live with your parents.
awesomeage82 you are about the most ignorant person I have read on here. I lost 7 friends in tower 1, and 2 of them called me after they were hit, and told me there were BOMBS going off in the building that were shaking the whole building. You need to investigate some more. It is a disservice to those who died NOT to show what truly happened. An example of the fires that burned: When you place a pot on your stove, does it melt? no different. Same degree. I rest my case against you. wake up
dude wtf i was replying to midgetman and besides i was just standing up for you..aint you sick of these stupid conspiracy theories? dont they annoy you a tad bit?
Yes they do. Im sorry I jumped down you throat. My nerves are still raw from that day, and missing my friends, and watching them die. It was so "public", their deaths. Makes me sad and angry all at once
Steel loses 90% of its strength at 1800 degrees. F*** off and do some real research, not heresay. No steel is fireproof... the fireproofing used on the building scraped off during the airplane-building collison. Once it was scraped off a little bit there was nothing stopping the steel from weakening.
Now, as for jet fuel... it burns at a maximum of 1500 degrees, and it burned for only 10 minutes. It was the other stuff in the building to heat up.
Micheal bush (G.W.B) brother was in chagre of the "terriost insurence" and a week b4 9/11 he took out all of his investment except for only 15 million left to defend the buildings
Dick Cheney called for an air force drill about 7 am on 9/11 and all our planes was sent to alaska! and were unable to defend us
we only had 2 planes here and they were unarmed
do i belive terriost did this, yes i do but i think our gov. new bout all this
ur so damn right wakenjake. are you other guys blind, u can see the eylposions damnit! If there were no explosions, what the fuck happen to the top of the building? It just dissapeared. It would fall on the side or would lie on the top of the rests but there was only dust after the building collapsed... Use ur head ! and there are so many other points which cant be true... Only cuz u guys love ur country u believe everthing the goverment says..and i tell u what they give a shit about you!
to get the No. tower to drop as it did the remaining support would need to be "kicked out" all at once,,is this how the jet fuel and 'carpet"were burning,,with the flames directed at the inner collumns and outer grid???if anything was "weakened" it would have been bent and distorted by the weight of the upper floors,,and would not have gained enough momenteum to crush the entire building,use your head!!
A TYPICAL house fire reaches over 600C. SO it is safe to say the fire in the towers reached AT LEAST 600C and could have approached 1000C or more. The reference in question is f00136.pdf (Full-Scale House Fire Experiment for InterFIRE VR, May 6, 1998. Report of Test). Commissioned by the NIST in 1998.
OMG IT WAS CLINTON! HE WAS THE ONE PLANNING ALL THIS!
steel when heated will loose its strength. got two jets loaded with jet fuel. come on. no explosion.... i feel for those families who lost loved ones on that day that have to deal with you freaks who want to put blame on the government for everything. but life goes on.
The temperature of the building site days after the crash exceeded the temperature that jet fuel burns. I am no conspiracy theorest -- how would I know the truth without committing an in-depth study to it? But I will say this: when Pearl Harbour was bombed, our government is documented to have had foreknowledge, but let it happen anyway. And when a destroyer was attacked off the coast of Vietnam? An pilot from Isreal later confessed it was the US government's doing. So it's not impossible.
"how would I know the truth without committing an in-depth study to it" Been done over and over by experts in the field. The problem is the twoofahs are very committed to their religion. No amount of logic or science will convince them.
Kerosene's adiabatic temperature exceeds 2000 degrees centigrade, so the idea that kerosene cannot burn hot enough to melt steel (1510C) is just plain wrong. But you wouldn't have adiabatic conditions in the towers.
Modern military and civil engines have peak RITs of the order of 3300 °R (2840 °F) or 1833 K (1560 °C).
So please, keep telling me that Jet-A (kerosene) cannot get hot enought in atmospheric air to melt steel... And then explain why GE, PW, & RR spend billions on metalurgy trying to make alloys and ceramics that can survive without melting (and how when a compressor frags, you get molten high temperature steel alloys spraying out the back).
BUT lets stick to simpler topics (so the twoofahs have some prayer of keeping up). A36 steel loses roughly 40% of its strength at 600C. The ignition temperature of JetA 210C. Open air burning temp of a pool of fuel 287C. Open air burning temp of a spray, 980C.
Paper ignites at 233C (and we can safely say, there was paper in the towers, and it was burning) not to mention carpet, furniture, people. One could say it resembled a house fire (with a few thousand pounds of jet A thrown in).
Joe5646 can u tell me why searching for the truth should be stupid? If you don't ask questions you will never get an answer. It's just ridiculous how obviously IT WAS AN INSIDEJOB and you guys still don't want to believe it. You're a f.. sheep and i guess that makes YOU stupid.... Just follow ur leader to hell..
Dust & Smoke being force out as it comes down their should be flashes all the way down the building first but their are none. The structure was evenly heated so it came down straight get over it it happend!
The first responders and firefighters ALL said it was like a belt of explosives going off all around the building, and racing down about every 3 floors, 30+ floors ahead of the detonation dust clouds. EVERYONE, PLEASE watch 911 Mysteries by Smallstorm. Or, the BEST by far is "911 revisited" by Rick Siegal, who used to work in both towers, and filmed the whole tragedy from the shores of Jersey. You can actually hear the bombs going off from across the river. Watch it, then judge.Hewasforcedtoflee
in order to justify the patriot act, which takes away some of the basic rights we once had. before WWI a similar event took place with the lusitania. The US knew that the germans would sink it if they sent it into german controlled waters, and were even warned, but did it anyway and used to the even to forward the amerikan public in believing war was the right direction to go.
Ok it surely is a demolition.We can all see the explosions and I always felt weird to believe that one plane can make a giant tower to fall like this.
especially in a vertical mode. It should have been all erratic, breaking up in different directions. The planes just with the speed may have shifted the balanced on the top and maybe moved it to the side just an inch or two, but it would have been enough for the building not to collapse so perfectly. INSIDE JOB FROM MOTHERFUCKING BUSH!
Sorry guys i promised too much ... I saw it on veoh tv and it's in german. But it's made by an american. Her name is smallstorm and it's definitly worth watching it. Maybe even in german.. So long
The video by Smallstorm is definately proof positive. It is the absolute smoking gun. Anyone who doesnt believe in the controlled demolition and slaughter of our own people by our own government needs to go to ground zero, and look at the huge hole left, and tell the spirits of those who died, tell them, go ahead, tell them outloud that you think it was from fire. Tell those who jumped it was from the plane. I think if the dead in that hallowed ground could, they would LYNCH you for saying that
but tell me why the hell can u clearly see explosions on the sides of the twin towers while they collapse? Just as u can see on the other buildings? for example at 1:43 and u can even see it better in other videos... ask a shot firer he will tell u the same... and where are the remains of the building? It degrade to dust! And there are so many other clues... by the way i cried several times when i saw it. It's just proofed it wasn't the plane... I look for the video i mean and give u the link
i want to belive bush didn´t do this.....tough after i heard they found bombs in the twin towers and bombs in the plane i know it couldnt been the terrorists that puted em there cuse they cant get out of the plane while flying.....and no terrorist was in the trade centers either so i think this was bush him self who did this...
Yeah, don't you think that woulda been a little obvious? They weren't trying to minimize destruction, They were trying to convince people. Use your fuckin' head.
browney118, that is the difference between implsion, and EXplosion. the building was cut by cutter charges into little "bite-sized" chunks that could be loaded and quickly whisked out of the country, to CHINA, so they could recycle the steel, and sell it back to us at a great profit to them. Oh dear, when is the other shoe going to drop I wonder.
Look at the WTC collapse. The buildings don't collapse like the controlled demo ones do. They collapse from the impact point down. Also, you have to realize that a building of that size contains a lot of air. When the towers collapsed that air compressed and went to escape through the windows. Finally, watch the History channel's program on the conspiracy and LISTEN to what the experts say.
Look at the 3:55 and 4:00 mark. Does it not seem strange that there is massive amounts of dust blowing out the side of the building
before much, if any, vertical collaps has taken place?
2 or 3 floors dropping that short distance can not gain enough kinectic energy to pulverize concrete into that much dust and blow it forcefully outward.
comlete bullshit. 1. the towers were designed to withstand the impact of boeing 707's (force directed around impact hole in wall). they collapsed due to the failure of steel floor trusses (connecting interior and exterior columns) under heat. 2. progressive collapse is when one floor gives way under stress and the rest follow (looks like a demolition). 3. the circles of small explosions are of the exterior collumns snapping due to them bending outwards (once the floor trusses had given way) DONE
god your stupid, get your fucking facts straight. first of all, 767's were the planes that hit the towers, not 747's. secondly, the towers were designed to withstand the impact of 707's because at the time of the tower's design they were the largest plane existing.
Just curious here. If the WTC buildings should not have fallen straight down and at the speed of gravity, how should they have fallen? Sideways, upwards, outwards, maybe they should have just floated away, lol. Should the collapse have taken maybe 20 minutes instead of a few seconds? Jesus!
They all keep saying it LOOKS LIKE a controlled demolition. LOOKING LIKE somthing and BEING something are two entirely different things. I could go to school LOOKING LIKE a duck, it doesn't mean I am one.
In order to have a "classic" collapse, there has to be another historical example somewhere. Wanna point out some of those steel-frame building collapses? (Hint- never happened in history - before or since)
Your conveniently leaving out the fact, two passenger planes have never flown directly into buildings (Hint- never happened in history - before or since)
Building 7 was not hit by an airplane. In addition, NIST, in their latest report also discounts the diesel fuel and the external damage, their mainstay excuses previously. Their evidence that it wasn't controlled demolition? The noise was not loud enough! You can't even make that up.
I am with Larktom. i think WTC 7 collapse is controlled demolition but twin towers not
christopher74664 2 months ago
Those explosions were caused by pressure of the towers falling. It's not fair to post this along with demolition footage. Two completely different scenarios
Larktgm 3 months ago
DADDYYYY!!!! DDDxxxx nooo y must u remind mee DX
IpawdTouchHelp15711 4 months ago
this wasnt a controlled demolition u jackass
12BJJohnson 4 months ago
is all of that real??
MKubicki100 5 months ago
WTC? Ahh yeah.. Not a CD.. not even close. But i bet the nuts in the "TM" don't understand why that is.
roquefortfiles 6 months ago
Y must u remind me!!!!!! D,:
Tina14445 7 months ago
Fuck george bush
papichulo6667 7 months ago 4
seeing that footage and hearing pplz reaction makes me feel sick :-/
MarcBurnsThatBarn 7 months ago
dont make fun of twin towers
SNiPErz37 8 months ago 2
Whats That?
AbbiePearceVids 9 months ago
@Fuckthehaloseries If you don't know than that is your problem but tell @12Weasel to shut the Hell up!
azar78345able 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Well, hes Dead now. Paarrrtttyyyy!!
ReeveseyDCFC 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12Weasel STUPID ASS BITCH! FUCK YOU MOTHER FUCKER!! FUCKING BITCH!!
azar78345able 9 months ago
@Fuckthehaloseries Why don't tell @12Weasel that? He is the one starting Shit with me for no reason. I was talking to someone else and then he jumped in and started be rude and offensive towards me. Tell @12Weasel to shut the Fuck up not me.
azar78345able 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12Weasel Fuck you Bitch! Stupid Fucking Son of a Bitch!! You are so stupid and ignorant. Don't Fuck with me Mother Fucker!! You stupid Fucking Son of a Bitch!! Fuck you!!
azar78345able 9 months ago
@12Weasel Your mother is a crying Bitch you stupid Mother Fucker now shut your Bitch Ass up 58ravenfan I know that this is you again Mother Fucker!!
azar78345able 9 months ago
@12Weasel You need to shut your Bitch Ass up and stop talking BullShit you stupid Ass Mother Fucker!! Who the Hell do you think you're talking to like that? You better watch who you are talking like that you stupid Son Of A Bitch!! Fucking Bitch Ass Mother Fucker!! Fuck you Bitch!
azar78345able 9 months ago
So many demolition experts, structural engineers, metalurologists, etc since 9/11. I would like to see some degrees.
aardvark9100 9 months ago
Wake up and think for yourselves. Look at the videos, take it in and think about it before immediately disregarding it as a conspiracy. If you can seriously read 9/11 Commission/NIST/FEMA/Silverstein reports and not have ANY questions, something is seriously wrong with you. They contradict each other, and simply do not add up to what you can visually see. Stop being so naïve, the Gov. has used false flag operations before, this is not anything new. Does anyone remember how/why we invaded Vietnam
MrColts420 10 months ago
@MrColts420 The Twin Towers disintigrated floor by floor and turned into dust and covered the streets of Lower Manhattan. 2 airplanes did not bring these towers down. They had to have used explosives to turn those skyscrapers into dust. Fire or severe damage alone could not bring down a huge skyscraper like the World Trade Center. There has to be further investigation to the events of 9/11.
azar78345able 9 months ago
Fire cannot cause such precise damage, as to take out each core/perimeter column, sequentially in the exact time/place needed to allow such a symmetrical, identical, free-fall “collapse” of two steel framed building. And then there is WTC7, which raises the most questions. 47 stories completely gone in six seconds, which NIST even admitted free fall. How is this possible?
MrColts420 10 months ago
Look at the damn buildings so called "collapse." They are completely gone in 10 seconds. They are hit at differ spots, at differ angles, yet they still both "collapse" in the same exact manner. How is that possible without the help of something? The fires were localized at the top of the building, so how are the thousands of tons of untouched steel below jeopardized, as to allow a free fall speed "collapse?" There is no resistance from the structure, the buildings gain momentum
MrColts420 10 months ago
@MrColts420 That is the question that alot of people can't answer. People say that the collapse started at the impact point where the airplanes hit the buildings. But it was only the top floors of the Twin Towers that were damaged by the impact of 767 jet airplanes. The rest of the floors above the impact zone were perfectly fine. It was only the top part of the World Trade Center that was severly damaged. 9/11 was an inside job.
azar78345able 9 months ago
Rolling over and accepting a blatant lie is complete disrespect to who lost their live on 911 and to ALL those soldiers continuing to die in Iraq/Afghanistan. Why are they still there? Remember we were supposed to be finding Bin Laden. It’s been 10 years, billions upon billions of dollars later, and we still can’t find him, why?
False Flag Op, used as justification to invade…
The buildings don't collapse, they are clearly disintegrating floor-by-floor before your own eyes
MrColts420 10 months ago
@MrColts420 Osama Bin Laden will never be found you know why? Because he is not responsible for 9/11. Alot of people still don't get the picture. Those 19 hijackers that were from Saudi Arabia in the Middle East were not on those 4 airplanes that were hijacked on 9/11. What kind of an investigation were the 9/11 Commission Report doing? The most important thing that needs further investigaion is building 7.
azar78345able 9 months ago
what were them circles showing in the vid? some people jumping out or somthing?
comeondown12345 10 months ago
This shows bursts AFTER the collapse of the WTC, not before.
Conspiracy-nuts are idiots.
kungfu2u2 11 months ago
I meant 911 but ok.
crazyjoel123 11 months ago
people, the builders of the twin towers planned the WTC so they would fall downwards like that and the terrorists knew where to hit the building so that all the right conditions would deteriorate the structure a certain way. So yes, it WAS planned. I doubt there were bombs... But if there were, it doesnt matter anyways, it still happened due to some smelly fucking middle eastern fuckers. FUCK THEM.
Rest in peace to all who were killed. <3
Wacoswim 11 months ago
I glad this happend fuck america
TheBigfanofeminem 1 year ago
I think bombs were on the wtc too many people said that because if yu noticed even before plane hit the wtc it blew up R.I.P ALL THOSE INOCENT PEOPLE IN THE WTC you was all brave x
MrJoejoeTT 1 year ago
Not being stupid, but I think they put bombs on the WTC
xiKiLLAx 1 year ago
That high of a altatude...there is less oxygen, that means the fire was getting weak (starved) never had much time to heat up the beams.
For that high of a building, it would take all day for it to come down couse of flames and still be standing with some lost floors.
A building like that being hit, it wouldnt be a free fall like that, like i siad, it would take all day and not 30 sec.
Its mainly smoke and dust, no flames.
You cant figour out who it is in 30 minutes of the crash, just cant!
jaheira2016 1 year ago
all this for receive the insurance and build a new tower and start a new war
Ganbala 1 year ago
fuck Osama Bin Laden he can suck my balls
Itachi48976 1 year ago
The twin towers are displayed in the end. Proof that5 you guys didn't watch the video till the end!
FantasticArts95 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job.
caferisque 1 year ago
Hers one thing no one realized 93 was supposed to hit the white house but it didn't and nothing went off. Plus with my own two goddamn eyes I saw those towers get hit from a plane. I was 6 when I saw it and i'll never forget. I was there in the streets. So those saying it was a goddamn bomb or cover up FUCK YOU because I'm tired of this. You weren't there shut up and listen to those that survived. Saying it was a cover up is a middle finger to New York, USA, and the victims ofthis tragedylike me
wheatthin488 1 year ago
what the fuke this are not the twin towers
O;
tania3991 1 year ago
I think eco-terrorists were responsible for 9/11. They knew that the resulting invasion of Iraq would drive up oil and gas prices and cause America's dependence on foreign oil to become even more evident that it already was, leading to a green technology revolution and the end of the fossil fuel era. You damned dirty hippies can rot in hell, God bless the USA!
GlassesInMyEyeball 1 year ago
@GlassesInMyEyeball LOL are you a payed shill....na can't be even they would make up a better story than that LOL LOL LOL USA is highjacked. They are coming for americans now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DoYouThinkForUrselF 1 year ago
What I find absolutely hilarious is how so many ignorant people claim "millions we're killed in the name of Christianity, remember the inquisition?" So many people have such little knowledge about the historical facts it's ridiculous!
Less than 3,000 people were killed during the Spanish Inquisition. Over almost 400 years less people were killed in this than 5 hours at the World Trade Center. Anything to promote genocide and minimize their agenda I guess.
8MCDonalds8 1 year ago
thats not twin towers idot if its not then put demolition of wtc or watever that is
iL0veCombatArms 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ow the fuck could they plant 1000s of tons of thermite into a building without anyone noticing, simple answer, they couldnt!!! To collapse buildings the size of twin towers would require huge amounts of explosives secretly installed, plus you always demolish buildings form the bottom not the top! and why wouldnt it go straight down? the building the size of that is always more likely to go straight down rather than any other way!
simonjonesy066 1 year ago
how the fuck could they plant 1000s of tons of thermite into a building without anyone noticing, simple answer, they couldnt!!! To collapse buildings the size of twin towers would require huge amounts of explosives secretly installed, plus you always demolish buildings form the bottom not the top! and why wouldnt it go straight down? the building the size of that is always more likely to go straight down rather than any other way!
simonjonesy066 1 year ago
Our world saw how terrorist destroyed the twin towers.I felt the pain of each and every person when twin towers collapsed down to the floor.
ironman3463 1 year ago
Who knows...with all the technology we have This could have been planned.....then the demolition could have been put there before...who knows? I doubt a tower could fall like that so clean like... if a plane struck into it and didnt lopside backwards....then why would it go straight down?....metal melting? true....but It wouldnt be so straight down like that...it could have fell backwards also
likatiger 1 year ago
one of those buildings i saw on cris angel mindfreak
TheAngelolivi1 1 year ago
also......do you think the policemen....or the firefighter can go upstairs and put the bombs near to the destruction site?? really...you're stupid..men..really....
tardom 1 year ago
why taht people think that?? !!! ARE YOU STUPID??? the smoke that go out of the floor is because the up floor go down and throw the smoke outside!! IT'S EASY!! do you really think that?? so stupid men..sooooo stupid....very eassy..!!
tardom 1 year ago
So if you're gonna try and "prove" that the World Trade Center was demolished. Why would you show demolitions before showing the collapse that go *bang bang bang bang* then collapse, then you get to the WTC collapse and all you hear is *ssssssssssssssssszzzzzzzzzz* not smart.
BeyondTheGovernment 1 year ago
the taliban's did it they probaly spent hours days months years maby to figure this plan out
TheDarkblade54 1 year ago
So, uh, do you think that Nist, Mit, Nypd, Nsa, Cia, Fbi and Popular Mechanics (to name a few) were in on the conspiracy? The fact is all of these organizations investigated 911 and came to conclusions about the collapse of the Twin Towers......none of them mention anything about a controlled demolition bringing down the towers. Please let me know when you find FACTUAL PROOF of your.....uh.....THEORY?
tickyul 1 year ago
@tickyul Why the hell would they speak up? Either they were involved, or in fear that they'd get picked off. Want some interesting facts? Why did the WTC plummet STRAIGHT down from a plane that crashed around the 60th floor!
masteryummy 1 year ago 3
@tickyul nist is incomplete, Nypd, says there were explosions, Popular Mechanics repeats the "official story" Do you only believe what you read ? OR do you believe your eyes? Watch the corners of the building.. no natural collapse here. Actual proof, look at the video of them coming down.. if you dont see and hear explosions your brain washed.
katlovesall 1 year ago
@katlovesall Yeah, I guess the 3 year deatailed analysis of 9-11 by Nist means nothing to some people. I base my opinions on the best available data, so far, the conspiracy people have been far from impressive. Popular Mechanics consulted with many experts, they do not buy into any conspiracy theories. I do not even want to rehash the collapse, you can consult with Rosie O'Dumbbell on that one.
tickyul 1 year ago
that is not a twin towers that is demolition
moonyandpadfoot07 1 year ago 9
@moonyandpadfoot07
scoretosettle 1 year ago
how does this happen does people get a mighty big sword and slashe the buildings
badboygoodboy1 2 years ago
dont believe your tv. dont believe the shit they force down your throats. read between the lines. money is the biggest motivator known to man.
oskarcowboy, micheal jacksons death is now being investigated as a homicide. his latest single "this is it" is punted to be his HIGHEST ever selling single over thriller and billy jean. NOW you try and convince me thats not a whole load of shit.
domtzj 2 years ago 2
raskitbob is exactly right. the president is merely a puppet controlled by a team of advisors and marketers. why was it that at the exact same time of the attack, the US airforce was conducting practice operations of the exact same scenarios unfolding. resulting in mass confusion in the air and on ground in air traffic control towers.
how else do you start a war over natural resources? simply by making the whole world believe someone else is the culprit and justice must prevail.
domtzj 2 years ago 2
and ive also seen the footage of the pentagon and there is no way there was a boeing 747 flying into more like an american missile it was the presidents idea whether u think it or not there are higher people than the president in the government the president is just the face of america it wudnt cross ne1s minds tht a dumbass like bush wud order this to
raskitbob 2 years ago 2
i completely agree with domtzj ive seen a lot of footage of the wtc coming down and u can see little explosions befor the collapsing gets to tht point and as the new york chief of fire sed "it was like boom boom boom boom
raskitbob 2 years ago
yea sure and micheal jacksons dead was also an inside job
oskarcowboy 2 years ago
Firstly, if you're American and your blind patriotism does not allow you to process these images unbiasedly don't bother commenting. It's understandable when something bad happens, you blame someone. The Black/Muslim/Jewish scapegoat.
Secondly there is no available footage of the attack to the Pentagon showing any aircraft shaped objects. Yet claims were made a 757 commercial plane left a "gapping hole" in the West Block. It was not wide enough to fit a 757's wingspan.
Educate Yourselves.
domtzj 2 years ago
ooo yeah that makes sense the president was in the white house when it came to him "I WANT TO KILL HUNDREDS OF AMERICANS YEAH!" i know he was a dumb ass but he wasn't some crazy dumb ass so when you say educate ourselves ask yourself this "why would Americans kill millions of citizens then spend millions on repairing the damage then just empty the building and then destroy it?" dumb ass
lithuanian12 2 years ago
how dumb are you? in every other video of demolitions the building comes down in one piece and being destroyed at the bottom when hitting the ground, when the twin towers fall, they collapse from top to bottom, with every floor hitting the next, that way it would be impossible for it to start falling to the side, it looks totaly different, you are just proving you are wrong by posting this video
Alfersnr2 2 years ago
Agreed, not wtc 7 though, it goes from the bottom. go look;....
mdonor18 2 years ago
Uh, it obviously was! Numerous planes crashing into the twin towers like that! Just ThinK!
dgenerationxman 2 years ago
Are people still that dense to STILL THINK IT WAS TERRORISTS, Come on 4 fuk sake how can people be so idiotically spasticated to watch the footage but not see it. Really pull that no brained head out ur ass and wipe that shit out ur eyes then maybe you will be able to see for once, oh yeh giv ur mouth a little wipe as well cause ur talkin shit to, 911=IiNnSsIiDdEe JjOoBb, INSIDE JOB, IiNnSsIiDdEe JjOoBb=Thousands of dumbass idiots with no common sense=doom for mankind.
Chrissyb1978 2 years ago
are these from terroists??? and what were these bulidings?
Kyralee97 2 years ago
9/11 was all planned out ppl especially americans should stop blaming muslims and start looking closer to home as it was their lovely G.Bush that planned it all !
xxASIYAxx 2 years ago
You sound reasonable... Time to up the medication.
trmbn352519 2 years ago
of course then the pope made the explosives and mother theresa planted the charges
oskarcowboy 2 years ago
And detonated them from the grassy knoll before escaping in Princess Diana's limo....
mdonor18 2 years ago
people are itiotes, wtc 7 was hit by one of the buildings debree as it came down, hitting the weak structure, causing it to COLLAPSE, they only way i'll beleive this theory is when the republicans admit they were behind the tower attacks, he ordered saudi arabians to take hold of the planes and smash them into the top of the building and in the morning, when there isn't many people, the top will be damaged, 500 or so people killed, but instead, the buildings collapsed 3,000 killed, all for oil!
waserman123 2 years ago
this is not true. I'm sorry, but those explosions are because of the pressure from the top of the building collapsing.
In the firefighters documentary you also see that when the plane hits the building, the pressure is so big that the explosion comes through an elevator shaft and blows out all the windows on the ground floor
thisispoul 2 years ago
can you please tell me where I can find a high quality version of the up close demolition squibs at 2:22 ? I would be most grateful.
smitty121981 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
9.11 was a nice day nothing bad happened dats wat my parents saID IM 9!
MrAhorro 2 years ago
"On a normal demolition it starts at the bottom and the top fals down after the bottom blows up. But on the WTC's it starts from the top and works its way down."
Because it was supposed to, dummy. This was a mind-fuck operation. It was supposed to be traumatic to cause nationwide PTSD and obsequiousness to the criminal government. Now they've shredded the Constitution and all of you either don't care or support it because of Islamic terrorism. It's almost too unbelievable to be true.
baguazhang1 2 years ago
There was no demolition. Did you not see the commercial jets slam into the towers and the gapping holes they left in their wake?
Atheistjeremy 2 years ago
Look closely at the collapsing. On a normal demolition it starts at the bottom and the top fals down after the bottom blows up. But on the WTC's it starts from the top and works its way down.
MelanicDisaster 2 years ago
I'm sorry but if this really did happen and it was really planned the main question is WHY? WHY did the governement let 2,669 people die? for Money? for Media purposes? I have no idea...this tradgedy is wrong - whether it was done with a plane or a controlled demolition - Evil...
Fullmoonwolf1 2 years ago
U Righttt
and 2749 people died not 2669 ^_^
this is EVIL
TERRORIST
kokym8 2 years ago
people are just to dumb...and you dont need proof... They say oh the terrorist make the wtc fall ..yeah right so YOUR TERRORIST set the fire in the wtc 7 too? thats what you mean?
stamm450 2 years ago
WTC 7 was hit when one of the tallest buildings in the world fell onto it. It's not hard to understand, for any rational person, how that could cause some serious damage.
Atheistjeremy 2 years ago
this doesnt look that realisti and was there aearthquake?
MissStackhouse 2 years ago
Okay am I really the only one who noticed that every one of the CDs shown here started from the ground up? None of them were on fire and none of them were hit by a plane. This video proves nothing but the desperation of conspirecy nuts.
repub21 3 years ago
That's because those CDs are meant to keep the surroundings unharmed.
If 911 is an inside job, who cares about keeping the surroundings unharmed during the CDs?
The more victims the merrier, don't you think?
And this way it's more spectacular, more visual.
While the collapse of the twin towers is already suspicious, what really won me over to the 911 truth is the CD of WTC 7 and its clean collapse.
Alex Jones is quite a loon, but he is right in one thing: 911 was an inside job!
Barachem 2 years ago
WTC7 started at the bottom, just like other CDs. WTC7 was not hit by a plane. It was damaged by debris from the North Tower. It had several fires on a few floors. That said, if WTC7 had suffered a partial or progressive collapse there would be little debate. The mystery is the MANNER of WTC7's collapse, not that it did collapse.
Challenge: find a building anything like WTC7 that collapsed anything like WTC7 did, due to anything but a CD. War, bombs, fire, earthquake, volcano, tornado...
Skeptic121 2 years ago
You can't bring down some of the tallest buildings in the world using traditional CD, which relies on dropping the building into its base. Instead, the Twin Towers were dropped using top-down CD. You can find examples of this on YouTube.
thedreamisstilldead 2 years ago
it wasn't
VIETNAMACE 3 years ago
I was 100% shure it was inside job and here is the proof:
the smoke from detonatioms in demonstrated buildings is the same in the collapse of the twin towers!
All stupid theories of structual failiure are fake!Those who talk about structual failiure SHUT THE FUCK UP!
petresko14 3 years ago
So now I know that I'm not crazy and that the whole time I was right about the Twin Towers being controlled...........
Nitoku12 3 years ago
This Proves It!
SMS4Click 3 years ago
fuck iraq
Bbbbbbailey 3 years ago
i agree, fucking camel jockies
miamiforlyfe 3 years ago
totaly agree!There was one who was from iraq and told me that they dont have a finger in it!Yeah right!
petresko14 3 years ago
if you laugh at this stuff, you must be a terrorist.
fooboo101 3 years ago
the pure truth!
nomis220 3 years ago
Everybody knows that was a contallable collapse, DONT U STILL KNOW IT
take a look pls
PLS !!! check this title in video google
Loose Change 2nd Edition
videoplay?docid=18010805834617 21459
TUAF10 3 years ago
and the word of the day for 9/11 is: OMG
HA!
BrutalChild 3 years ago
0:23
No wait! I left my cat in my room on the 20th floor!
EggMoneyProductions 3 years ago
what was with the building at 1:56? It wasn't ever "hit" by a plane or damaged by any debris big enough to cause it to fall was there?
soillsalukis 3 years ago
true, they say it happened cuz of the "fires" it was burning...but the fires were 2 small to cause any dmg, you can search "WTC 7 BBC" and watch the first video.
xBlooDBoY 3 years ago
Top down implosion. End of story.
DigitalPraise7 3 years ago
Anyone who has worked construction or been in a multi story building knows that they are very well sealed i.e. dont "breathe". The puffs you saw were the walls and windows blowing out of the side of the building from the weight and accompanying air pressure of x-teen stories compressing the air in what amounts to an enclosed tube. The puffs are weakspots in the exterior. Like a straw with a hole in it the air escapes wherever it can most easily. Stop thinking with emotions and use your brains.
aguywithfeet 3 years ago
wildbuzz666 what a great montage. It plainly shows the actual demolitions of other buildings, and compares them to the north and south towers, and bldg 7, and you can plainly see the explosive squibs from the bombs that were belted all around up and down the buildings. And those poor people in them had NO idea our own people were killing them. The last hing my friend in the north said to me was "South just went down, the bombs are working in this one now. I am going to die. I love you". then....
orangevalesweetpea 3 years ago
oh my gosh!!!!!!!
jhunsuba 3 years ago
none of the black boxes in the plane were found (which are boxes that will record any/everything and the gov. couldnt "find them"
the towers fell at free fall speed...and for those who say it was cuz the steel was melted
well the steel was "fire proof" and that stell would ONLY start to melt at 2500degress
and the jet fuel only could get up to 1800 when being burned.... so the only thing that could explain it was.....DEMOLITION....
it gave our gov. the rite to then blame it all on the
Midgetman303 3 years ago
Mate, you dont even know what your saying....its like a slap in the face to the victims of 9/11. They couldnt find the black box because the fire burning in the buildings were over 1000 degrees. And besides they did find the black box on the plane that hit in Pensyllvania and 9/11 was not a cover up, your probabbly some middle aged fat nerdy little bitch and still live with your parents.
awesomage82 3 years ago
awesomeage82 you are about the most ignorant person I have read on here. I lost 7 friends in tower 1, and 2 of them called me after they were hit, and told me there were BOMBS going off in the building that were shaking the whole building. You need to investigate some more. It is a disservice to those who died NOT to show what truly happened. An example of the fires that burned: When you place a pot on your stove, does it melt? no different. Same degree. I rest my case against you. wake up
orangevalesweetpea 3 years ago
dude wtf i was replying to midgetman and besides i was just standing up for you..aint you sick of these stupid conspiracy theories? dont they annoy you a tad bit?
awesomage82 3 years ago
Yes they do. Im sorry I jumped down you throat. My nerves are still raw from that day, and missing my friends, and watching them die. It was so "public", their deaths. Makes me sad and angry all at once
orangevalesweetpea 3 years ago
Steel loses 90% of its strength at 1800 degrees. F*** off and do some real research, not heresay. No steel is fireproof... the fireproofing used on the building scraped off during the airplane-building collison. Once it was scraped off a little bit there was nothing stopping the steel from weakening.
Now, as for jet fuel... it burns at a maximum of 1500 degrees, and it burned for only 10 minutes. It was the other stuff in the building to heat up.
FragFighter 3 years ago
Facts!
9/11 acually made our gov BILLIONS of $!!!!
Micheal bush (G.W.B) brother was in chagre of the "terriost insurence" and a week b4 9/11 he took out all of his investment except for only 15 million left to defend the buildings
Dick Cheney called for an air force drill about 7 am on 9/11 and all our planes was sent to alaska! and were unable to defend us
we only had 2 planes here and they were unarmed
do i belive terriost did this, yes i do but i think our gov. new bout all this
Midgetman303 3 years ago
the twin towers would have never fallen if bush was never elected president
zenemij78 3 years ago 2
You can't say that. There are too many incertainties. I am no Bush lover, but I must report accurately.
FragFighter 3 years ago
Who said he was elected?
cavs357 3 years ago
eylposions = explosions... damn you youtube
OPrimoO 3 years ago
ur so damn right wakenjake. are you other guys blind, u can see the eylposions damnit! If there were no explosions, what the fuck happen to the top of the building? It just dissapeared. It would fall on the side or would lie on the top of the rests but there was only dust after the building collapsed... Use ur head ! and there are so many other points which cant be true... Only cuz u guys love ur country u believe everthing the goverment says..and i tell u what they give a shit about you!
OPrimoO 3 years ago
Get a degree in engineering before you post a video like this.
ImperialElite1 3 years ago
to get the No. tower to drop as it did the remaining support would need to be "kicked out" all at once,,is this how the jet fuel and 'carpet"were burning,,with the flames directed at the inner collumns and outer grid???if anything was "weakened" it would have been bent and distorted by the weight of the upper floors,,and would not have gained enough momenteum to crush the entire building,use your head!!
wakenjake420 3 years ago
Yeah, controlled demolition. Makes sense wildbuzz666. Is the tinfoil hat you wear uncomfortable?
Branko37 3 years ago
i live in new york this is some bullshit. who ever did this is going to pay!!!!!!!!!
mscoollozer 3 years ago
A TYPICAL house fire reaches over 600C. SO it is safe to say the fire in the towers reached AT LEAST 600C and could have approached 1000C or more. The reference in question is f00136.pdf (Full-Scale House Fire Experiment for InterFIRE VR, May 6, 1998. Report of Test). Commissioned by the NIST in 1998.
OMG IT WAS CLINTON! HE WAS THE ONE PLANNING ALL THIS!
Lol.
Fucking twoofah idiots.
conotoxin 3 years ago
steel when heated will loose its strength. got two jets loaded with jet fuel. come on. no explosion.... i feel for those families who lost loved ones on that day that have to deal with you freaks who want to put blame on the government for everything. but life goes on.
FTM-PTB
southerndipper78 3 years ago
The temperature of the building site days after the crash exceeded the temperature that jet fuel burns. I am no conspiracy theorest -- how would I know the truth without committing an in-depth study to it? But I will say this: when Pearl Harbour was bombed, our government is documented to have had foreknowledge, but let it happen anyway. And when a destroyer was attacked off the coast of Vietnam? An pilot from Isreal later confessed it was the US government's doing. So it's not impossible.
AMcGrath82 3 years ago
"how would I know the truth without committing an in-depth study to it" Been done over and over by experts in the field. The problem is the twoofahs are very committed to their religion. No amount of logic or science will convince them.
Kerosene's adiabatic temperature exceeds 2000 degrees centigrade, so the idea that kerosene cannot burn hot enough to melt steel (1510C) is just plain wrong. But you wouldn't have adiabatic conditions in the towers.
conotoxin 3 years ago
Modern military and civil engines have peak RITs of the order of 3300 °R (2840 °F) or 1833 K (1560 °C).
So please, keep telling me that Jet-A (kerosene) cannot get hot enought in atmospheric air to melt steel... And then explain why GE, PW, & RR spend billions on metalurgy trying to make alloys and ceramics that can survive without melting (and how when a compressor frags, you get molten high temperature steel alloys spraying out the back).
conotoxin 3 years ago
BUT lets stick to simpler topics (so the twoofahs have some prayer of keeping up). A36 steel loses roughly 40% of its strength at 600C. The ignition temperature of JetA 210C. Open air burning temp of a pool of fuel 287C. Open air burning temp of a spray, 980C.
Paper ignites at 233C (and we can safely say, there was paper in the towers, and it was burning) not to mention carpet, furniture, people. One could say it resembled a house fire (with a few thousand pounds of jet A thrown in).
conotoxin 3 years ago
u conspiracy wierdos r fuckin stupid
Joe5646 3 years ago
Joe5646 can u tell me why searching for the truth should be stupid? If you don't ask questions you will never get an answer. It's just ridiculous how obviously IT WAS AN INSIDEJOB and you guys still don't want to believe it. You're a f.. sheep and i guess that makes YOU stupid.... Just follow ur leader to hell..
OPrimoO 3 years ago
Gee, more conspiracy theories.
chgafan 3 years ago
Yes, your stupid yellow circle show structural weakness in buildinga about to fall...What is your fucking point?? I hate you idiots.
robotactionstar 3 years ago
Dust & Smoke being force out as it comes down their should be flashes all the way down the building first but their are none. The structure was evenly heated so it came down straight get over it it happend!
YouFucked2 3 years ago
The first responders and firefighters ALL said it was like a belt of explosives going off all around the building, and racing down about every 3 floors, 30+ floors ahead of the detonation dust clouds. EVERYONE, PLEASE watch 911 Mysteries by Smallstorm. Or, the BEST by far is "911 revisited" by Rick Siegal, who used to work in both towers, and filmed the whole tragedy from the shores of Jersey. You can actually hear the bombs going off from across the river. Watch it, then judge.Hewasforcedtoflee
orangevalesweetpea 3 years ago
what???americans made the twin towers collapse with explosions???not impossible but why????
supervaghelara 3 years ago
in order to justify the patriot act, which takes away some of the basic rights we once had. before WWI a similar event took place with the lusitania. The US knew that the germans would sink it if they sent it into german controlled waters, and were even warned, but did it anyway and used to the even to forward the amerikan public in believing war was the right direction to go.
spamisyummo 3 years ago
Ok it surely is a demolition.We can all see the explosions and I always felt weird to believe that one plane can make a giant tower to fall like this.
vedraville 3 years ago
especially in a vertical mode. It should have been all erratic, breaking up in different directions. The planes just with the speed may have shifted the balanced on the top and maybe moved it to the side just an inch or two, but it would have been enough for the building not to collapse so perfectly. INSIDE JOB FROM MOTHERFUCKING BUSH!
sebaspipi 3 years ago 2
we both should have watched this vid to the end ^^
OPrimoO 3 years ago
what was the point of this video sorry=/
xoxocbrownxhunni3 3 years ago
What tragedy!!!!!!!!
I wish the Americans know but they are provata!!!!!
God Bless the Souls of all those victims!!!!!!
agelikiwilliamsburg 3 years ago
Sorry guys i promised too much ... I saw it on veoh tv and it's in german. But it's made by an american. Her name is smallstorm and it's definitly worth watching it. Maybe even in german.. So long
OPrimoO 3 years ago
The video by Smallstorm is definately proof positive. It is the absolute smoking gun. Anyone who doesnt believe in the controlled demolition and slaughter of our own people by our own government needs to go to ground zero, and look at the huge hole left, and tell the spirits of those who died, tell them, go ahead, tell them outloud that you think it was from fire. Tell those who jumped it was from the plane. I think if the dead in that hallowed ground could, they would LYNCH you for saying that
orangevalesweetpea 3 years ago
but tell me why the hell can u clearly see explosions on the sides of the twin towers while they collapse? Just as u can see on the other buildings? for example at 1:43 and u can even see it better in other videos... ask a shot firer he will tell u the same... and where are the remains of the building? It degrade to dust! And there are so many other clues... by the way i cried several times when i saw it. It's just proofed it wasn't the plane... I look for the video i mean and give u the link
OPrimoO 3 years ago
those arent the twin towers douche bag
zachdesoto 3 years ago
i want to belive bush didn´t do this.....tough after i heard they found bombs in the twin towers and bombs in the plane i know it couldnt been the terrorists that puted em there cuse they cant get out of the plane while flying.....and no terrorist was in the trade centers either so i think this was bush him self who did this...
fidjibajs1 3 years ago
well someday we all will find out what really happen to the tower, and it will shock the world! maybe
coolcoolcoolest 3 years ago
what was the circle trying to show?
pointblood77 3 years ago
Notice how all of the buildings collapse inwards not outwards like on 9/11?
browny118 3 years ago
Yeah, don't you think that woulda been a little obvious? They weren't trying to minimize destruction, They were trying to convince people. Use your fuckin' head.
brodudesnsupras 3 years ago
| know what i beleave and it aint this shit!
browny118 3 years ago
browney118, that is the difference between implsion, and EXplosion. the building was cut by cutter charges into little "bite-sized" chunks that could be loaded and quickly whisked out of the country, to CHINA, so they could recycle the steel, and sell it back to us at a great profit to them. Oh dear, when is the other shoe going to drop I wonder.
orangevalesweetpea 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Attack of the Muslims! Run for your lives!
AlbinoTarantula 3 years ago
Look at the WTC collapse. The buildings don't collapse like the controlled demo ones do. They collapse from the impact point down. Also, you have to realize that a building of that size contains a lot of air. When the towers collapsed that air compressed and went to escape through the windows. Finally, watch the History channel's program on the conspiracy and LISTEN to what the experts say.
Jcsthird 3 years ago
dude
if there WAS a conspiracy, the expert on the history channel would tell you EXACTLY that.
way too many 'experts' around anyway
ziggydiggy84 3 years ago
Look at the 3:55 and 4:00 mark. Does it not seem strange that there is massive amounts of dust blowing out the side of the building
before much, if any, vertical collaps has taken place?
2 or 3 floors dropping that short distance can not gain enough kinectic energy to pulverize concrete into that much dust and blow it forcefully outward.
xbird2007 3 years ago
comlete bullshit. 1. the towers were designed to withstand the impact of boeing 707's (force directed around impact hole in wall). they collapsed due to the failure of steel floor trusses (connecting interior and exterior columns) under heat. 2. progressive collapse is when one floor gives way under stress and the rest follow (looks like a demolition). 3. the circles of small explosions are of the exterior collumns snapping due to them bending outwards (once the floor trusses had given way) DONE
deathcoredouchebag 3 years ago
Don't forget the thermite (which was spotted) that was used to melt the steel.
Evi1Jester 3 years ago
How can you say that they were designed to take the impact of boeing 707's .. The towers were built long before them.
browny118 3 years ago
haha umm get ur facts straight, the 707 was developed in the 1950's where as the towers construction began in the 1960's
deathcoredouchebag 3 years ago
Get your facts straight .. a boeing 747 hit the buildings not no 707.
browny118 3 years ago
god your stupid, get your fucking facts straight. first of all, 767's were the planes that hit the towers, not 747's. secondly, the towers were designed to withstand the impact of 707's because at the time of the tower's design they were the largest plane existing.
deathcoredouchebag 3 years ago
"the towers were designed to withstand the impact of 707's"
"There is no danger that Titanic will sink. The boat is unsinkable and nothing but inconvenience will be suffered by the passengers."
-Phillip Franklin, White Star Line Vice-President
PoetryHound 3 years ago
Just curious here. If the WTC buildings should not have fallen straight down and at the speed of gravity, how should they have fallen? Sideways, upwards, outwards, maybe they should have just floated away, lol. Should the collapse have taken maybe 20 minutes instead of a few seconds? Jesus!
Smacked980 3 years ago
They all keep saying it LOOKS LIKE a controlled demolition. LOOKING LIKE somthing and BEING something are two entirely different things. I could go to school LOOKING LIKE a duck, it doesn't mean I am one.
fafnir242 3 years ago
Thats BS wat ur saying, if a duck looks like a duck it is a duck.duhh
larrylob1234 3 years ago
Yeah, but you sure do have a brain of a duck.
Evi1Jester 3 years ago
this video is very educational about what had appen in 9/11 to these towers but some people still are blinded by government lies...
see photos of buildings 3,4,5 and 6 and ask yourself why they didn´t collapse totaly like buiding 7!
olivazemeis 3 years ago
Classic Collapse?
In order to have a "classic" collapse, there has to be another historical example somewhere. Wanna point out some of those steel-frame building collapses? (Hint- never happened in history - before or since)
maturin42 3 years ago
Your conveniently leaving out the fact, two passenger planes have never flown directly into buildings (Hint- never happened in history - before or since)
Smacked980 3 years ago
Building 7 was not hit by an airplane. In addition, NIST, in their latest report also discounts the diesel fuel and the external damage, their mainstay excuses previously. Their evidence that it wasn't controlled demolition? The noise was not loud enough! You can't even make that up.
maturin42 3 years ago