The German BND is the ex 3rd Reich GESTAPO and had organized delegate Scheuermann of our county to visit or home.To allow him to personally see how my brother and our parents was tortured.The BND continued to torture my brother.He was assassinated on July 11th2009.Half a year later the CDU delegate Mappus from our district town Pforzheim was made prime minister of the German land of Baden Würtemberg
@wwwtotalitaerde Please ignore this buffoon. Martin Bott is suffering from a psychosis that makes him believe the government is after him, controlling minds everywhere etc. >_> His allegedly murdered brother even went to court against him because he didn’t want him to use his name for that nonsense. Now he sticks to defaming my country in Youtube videos. He’s totally deranged.
@Vorox144 Yes! I'm veeeery curious to see how the hell this thing will take off from a carrier deck. Have you all ever seen a C-130 taking off? I bet you have!
@SermanRoy I've some prior C-130 experience (nothing much past intro training, and not my current airframe), so maybe I can help you out.
The aircraft in the vid can have RAT, also known as JATO or RATO (depending on the service). Essentially rockets mounted to the aft of the fuselage.
Combine that with the carrier at full power into a moderate headwind (40 knots total headwind easily!), the C-130 engines at max TRT, and a light fuel load - getting a C-130 off the deck is actually doable!
@AquaticRapture Thanks mate. Glad to hear from another pilot. Very good information. It sounds very interesting and impressive yet worth to see. Do you know if there is any video available?
@tosgem Britisher? What? First of all, there is no such thing is a british accent , that's the most common mistake made by americans, what you're hearing most of the time when you think it's a brit accent is a quintisential english accent. Britain is comprised of england, ireland scotland and wales.
@Antifaith29 You have to excuse my dumbass fellow American I guess he doesnt realize that long ago we used to be...umm....*clears throat* britishers. (Oh god It even hurts to say.)
@Antifaith29 You have to excuse my dumbass fellow American I guess he doesnt realize that long ago we used to be...umm....*clears throat* britishers. (Oh god It even hurts to say.)
@McFixStuff Do you realize how old that video is? The cell phone, personal computer and the internet had not been invented yet when that test was run.
@McFixStuff cell phone ROFLMAO that was done in the late 60's or early 70's with an actual video camera. the reason you dont see this happen except in testing or EXTREME emergencies is the C-130 wing span is too damm big
The C-130 can reverse the pitch on the the blades. If you've ever seen the Blue Angels, you've seen "Fat Albert" land in about 350 ft. They probably did not use arrestor cables for this landing. (Notice that there is no abrupt nose drop) With the Carrier at Flank speed into the wind, and with a RAT (Rocket Assisted Take-off) system, they can be off the deck in a couple hundred feet.
@dcorman A C-130 doesn't have an arresting hook, so taking a wire wasn't an option. They are designed for short field landings, which are made much shorter when the field is doing 35+ knots into the wind. Takeoff: same idea. Not as hard when your airfield provides a big chunk of takeoff speed.
@flyrod6057 I know they don't use them. I was only stating that they have that ability. And yes it is rare. Biggest reason why is because they don't need them. Hell the C130 can land on a carrier like in the vid and then take off almost right from the same exact spot. Im just saying the rockets would make it that much more crazy.
Yeah those carriers can give you a 25 + knot headwind, plus whatever breeze in blowing. Plus it looks almost empty - they can leap into the air when light.
@dskxalive They can get it off with a clear deck and a strong headwind. It is a worthless capability when trying to run flight operations because it renders the rest of the deck inoperable.
Does anyone happen to know how much weight a catapult can physically take before breaking? This plane obviously is much heavier than anything else (D'OH! I know, just didn't know another way to say it).
@336kgf This USMC C-130 did touch & go's, landings and take-offs unassisted (no tail hook & arrestor hooks, no catapult launch) twenty something times. Though I'm not from the USN, I'd say those cat shots only go up to about 35 tons because that's just above the highest max take-off weight I've seen for all the Navy planes ever since they flew jets, this being the lovely classic F-14 at 33+ tons, with the Super Hornet coming second at just under 30 tons. But don't take my word for it.
the c-130 with is still in use in certain variations has been fitted with rockets to allow it to take off from a football field a aircraft carrier with a catapult launch system is cake for a c-130.
All the stuff that the Air Force do to freakin C-130s...they should put rail attachments on them...like a gun...and have me buy one....i can put a Holographic sight on my C-130....haha
to all those putting up questions here how the C130 took off again - how about, after watching the video "C130 carrier landing, taking a look at "C130 carrier take off". it's at the bar to your right hand side. now, isn't that a solution?
It takes off by reversing, pushing the throttle forwards, and then pulling back on the stick, doesn't need the catapult or anything, Hercs have insanely short take off distance
@CubesForAKid I know the Hurk has a short take off distance but it aint that short, and there's no way the cat is gonna throw that thing off the deck and into the air .
@Herbymac0811 Steam Powered Catapults. the same that launch the F/A 18, E2 Hawkeye, P3 Orion, EA6-B Prowler off the Flight deck. I am ABH3 (Aviation Boatswains mate, Handling, 3rd class Petty Officer) in the U.S. Navy. in short, an aircraft director. i've directed all these aircraft i mentioned to launches and to parking after landing hundreds of times. i've done it for 4 years so far, I'm 23 and I'm making it my career. It never gets boring!
@Herbymac0811 people look I love airplanes, I know they got it back in the air again there is a video showing it ! The comment was written as a joke !
@Herbymac0811 Back it up and go. There was no arresting gear or provisions for catapult bridals, nor JATO bottles. There should be a video of the whole operation if you look. From what I remember these were all light weight trials. I wonder how it would go fully loaded.
@DiEGO2DaBAY Nope. Watch the other video. All they did was go to the back of the deck, turn the ship into the wind, both ship and plane went to full power, and off the deck it went =)
@snooter28 Actually a C-130 has no Launch bar in the front, they more than likely used JATO or Jet Assisted Take Off rockets to aid it in getting back in the air.
@starbreez3 Well I'm sure they can use it to assist the plane with taking off, It alone cant do it, but with the engine, some rockets assisting, and the catapult. They probably could.
@qtight Nope. find the other video for it. all the did was turn the boat into the wind, went to full power with the plane and it left the deck all by its self.
@sashman3988 not really, C130 stall speed is 85 - 90 knots. The carrier steaming into the wind can easily reduce the actual approach speed by 20 knots or more. Coupled with the fact that the C130 can push the prope to negative pitch, makes this a lot easier than it appears.
German propaganda is spreading that Germany gives so very much money to international organizations or foreign countries. Oviously this money is spend to infiltrate other countries to gain influence. So watch out for german snitchers.
The German BND tortured my brother Markus Bott during five and a half years. He was assassinated on 11.7.09 because of our homepage.
The C-130 is just one of those designs where everything went right. You see a lot of accidents with them, but they are put into situations that would crush lesser airframes. The REALLY funny part is that Airbus is just marketing a similar design.
I had to watch that like 10 times. Man, he barely got on the deck by 20, 25 feet. Guess he needed the whole thing. I'm looking for a vid showing the F-111A doing a takeoff/ landing from a carrier during it's early development before the USAF took it. Does such a video exist?
@meowmeowfishfish Yes, sir, you are correct. It was the B model. There were several obvious feature differences between the Navy B and the USAF A model. Shorter Radar dome and aviaonics bay, for one. Good catch, thanks.
@jonesy97 Yes, look under F-111B or F-14 part 1. It was canceled after the Grumman started building the mighty Tomcat. F-111 was an Air Force bomber, so I think it wouldn't have worked out
@xTomcatsForeverVF84x Thx. I finally found a vid of carrier trials for the F-111. The USAF had not accepted yet, but yes, the Tomcat was soon to follow. Btw, love the F-15E's all over your home page. Glad to see you like the good 'ol Air Force, too! I used to be a weapons Systems Specialist on the F-111D and F models.
i finally found a plane i could land on my roof
dodgingdaniel 5 days ago
I want to see it take off!
toolmkr1 2 weeks ago
The German BND is the ex 3rd Reich GESTAPO and had organized delegate Scheuermann of our county to visit or home.To allow him to personally see how my brother and our parents was tortured.The BND continued to torture my brother.He was assassinated on July 11th2009.Half a year later the CDU delegate Mappus from our district town Pforzheim was made prime minister of the German land of Baden Würtemberg
The CDU is the ruling party in Germany
wwwtotalitaerde 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@wwwtotalitaerde Please ignore this buffoon. Martin Bott is suffering from a psychosis that makes him believe the government is after him, controlling minds everywhere etc. >_> His allegedly murdered brother even went to court against him because he didn’t want him to use his name for that nonsense. Now he sticks to defaming my country in Youtube videos. He’s totally deranged.
xSuperiorManx 3 weeks ago
@wwwtotalitaerde Why the crap is this posted here?
t110d93 2 weeks ago
@t110d93 Why the crap are you posting on my page?
jimboking 1 week ago
and now stay tuned for takeoff LMAO
Vorox144 1 month ago
@Vorox144 Yes! I'm veeeery curious to see how the hell this thing will take off from a carrier deck. Have you all ever seen a C-130 taking off? I bet you have!
SermanRoy 1 month ago
@SermanRoy I've some prior C-130 experience (nothing much past intro training, and not my current airframe), so maybe I can help you out.
The aircraft in the vid can have RAT, also known as JATO or RATO (depending on the service). Essentially rockets mounted to the aft of the fuselage.
Combine that with the carrier at full power into a moderate headwind (40 knots total headwind easily!), the C-130 engines at max TRT, and a light fuel load - getting a C-130 off the deck is actually doable!
AquaticRapture 1 month ago
@AquaticRapture Thanks mate. Glad to hear from another pilot. Very good information. It sounds very interesting and impressive yet worth to see. Do you know if there is any video available?
SermanRoy 4 weeks ago
But does it blend?
boganindustries 1 month ago
"Look Ma. No Hook!"
LOL
Marckyle64 2 months ago
Good luck taking off
TomPetersonXc 2 months ago
@TomPetersonXc They can do it.
WatchdogDisciple 1 month ago
now try to take off!
kongu132 2 months ago
Now take off
berathan90 2 months ago
THAT THING BRAKES FASTER THAN MY JEEP
tninbredretard 2 months ago 12
"Great job guys we got this big bird on the carrier! Now.... how do we get it off?"
KillDmidgets 2 months ago
How did they get it off?
GrapefruitSalad97 2 months ago
imagin if the people were stupid enough to think it was a c-5
23futurepilot 2 months ago
Incredible footage !!
colindominy 2 months ago 2
the great thing about a carrier is its able to turn into the wind =)
andysim232 3 months ago
Funny accent, sounds "All American" but then he says some words like a britisher
tosgem 3 months ago
@tosgem Britisher? What? First of all, there is no such thing is a british accent , that's the most common mistake made by americans, what you're hearing most of the time when you think it's a brit accent is a quintisential english accent. Britain is comprised of england, ireland scotland and wales.
Secondly...seriously? Britisher?
Antifaith29 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 Too right, I think there are more accents in Britain than there is in America.
Vash002 2 months ago
@Antifaith29 You have to excuse my dumbass fellow American I guess he doesnt realize that long ago we used to be...umm....*clears throat* britishers. (Oh god It even hurts to say.)
WatchdogDisciple 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Antifaith29 You have to excuse my dumbass fellow American I guess he doesnt realize that long ago we used to be...umm....*clears throat* britishers. (Oh god It even hurts to say.)
WatchdogDisciple 1 month ago
@tosgem sorry...I cant hear you over our FREE HEALTH CARE!
HomerJEDL 2 months ago
@HomerJEDL oh thats mean. Dont bash us US citizens because our government is re-fucking-tarded
WatchdogDisciple 1 month ago
@fishnut89 you're right. Although it only did one landing and one takeoff, not Continuous service, it still holds the record
fiverats1 3 months ago
The C-130 is still in use by the USMC... They just stopped ordering new ones, I jumped from one in 2006...
Muddy79Ford 3 months ago
i like lemon
Pringles352 4 months ago
I didn't know that was even possible.
ps3specter 4 months ago
not gonna lie that was fuckin sweet
killman369547 4 months ago
why do people upload videos at cellphone resolution (160x120)?
McFixStuff 4 months ago
@McFixStuff Do you realize how old that video is? The cell phone, personal computer and the internet had not been invented yet when that test was run.
KRWoodworks 4 months ago
@McFixStuff cell phone ROFLMAO that was done in the late 60's or early 70's with an actual video camera. the reason you dont see this happen except in testing or EXTREME emergencies is the C-130 wing span is too damm big
truckerjay1 4 weeks ago
@truckerjay1 ...Far as I know...this was only done for short time period of testing and evaluation awhile back! It is cool as hell to see this clip!
BTW: 20yr. Retired Navy Veteran (did a tour of duty in an Aircraft Carrier in late 80's)!
45gunner 3 weeks ago
The C-130 can reverse the pitch on the the blades. If you've ever seen the Blue Angels, you've seen "Fat Albert" land in about 350 ft. They probably did not use arrestor cables for this landing. (Notice that there is no abrupt nose drop) With the Carrier at Flank speed into the wind, and with a RAT (Rocket Assisted Take-off) system, they can be off the deck in a couple hundred feet.
dcorman 4 months ago 12
@dcorman A C-130 doesn't have an arresting hook, so taking a wire wasn't an option. They are designed for short field landings, which are made much shorter when the field is doing 35+ knots into the wind. Takeoff: same idea. Not as hard when your airfield provides a big chunk of takeoff speed.
flyrod6057 2 months ago
@flyrod6057 I know, I was responding to another comment :)
dcorman 2 months ago
@flyrod6057 not to mention theyre able to strap rockets on it to make the landing stop almost on a dime.
WatchdogDisciple 1 month ago
@WatchdogDisciple They don't use rockets to stop. Only for takeoff, and even then, it's extremely rare.
flyrod6057 1 month ago
@flyrod6057 I know they don't use them. I was only stating that they have that ability. And yes it is rare. Biggest reason why is because they don't need them. Hell the C130 can land on a carrier like in the vid and then take off almost right from the same exact spot. Im just saying the rockets would make it that much more crazy.
WatchdogDisciple 1 month ago
When you have a stall speed of 80mph, its amazing where you can land, including the uss forestfire
dsoutherngent1 5 months ago 2
@aloozer the c-130 doesn't use the traps only brakes.
Youre1Garbage 5 months ago
how strong are those fricking arresting cables...my god
aloozer 5 months ago
@aloozer No arresting gear were used for that test.
KRWoodworks 4 months ago 2
After watching this video, I've also believe in Santa Claus.
TheWashingtonCruz 5 months ago
Yeah those carriers can give you a 25 + knot headwind, plus whatever breeze in blowing. Plus it looks almost empty - they can leap into the air when light.
hogey74 5 months ago
oh yea. it didn't use the catapult. and this is a C-130A model so it is not setup for jato.
crashcx 6 months ago
it did take back off. do a search for c-130 carrier takeoff.
crashcx 6 months ago
The first ever c-130 carrier landing has taken place! Now the us navy are in negotiations for how to get her off the carrier!
dskxalive 6 months ago
@dskxalive They can get it off with a clear deck and a strong headwind. It is a worthless capability when trying to run flight operations because it renders the rest of the deck inoperable.
stalkingalizee 5 months ago
could i have one as a toy?....please?...
arthurdragon17 7 months ago
Does anyone happen to know how much weight a catapult can physically take before breaking? This plane obviously is much heavier than anything else (D'OH! I know, just didn't know another way to say it).
336kgf 7 months ago
@336kgf This USMC C-130 did touch & go's, landings and take-offs unassisted (no tail hook & arrestor hooks, no catapult launch) twenty something times. Though I'm not from the USN, I'd say those cat shots only go up to about 35 tons because that's just above the highest max take-off weight I've seen for all the Navy planes ever since they flew jets, this being the lovely classic F-14 at 33+ tons, with the Super Hornet coming second at just under 30 tons. But don't take my word for it.
Nighthawk117 7 months ago
@Nighthawk117 Still, to see a Herc get launched would have been rather cool to see.
336kgf 7 months ago
dose it have cup holders?
Lola10221989 7 months ago
@Lola10221989 Yes, Very small ones on the pilot/ copilot shelves
JohnADickhead 7 months ago
@Lola10221989 Yes!
n1dp 1 month ago
owd they get it off is the real question!
1Filmproducer 7 months ago
the c-130 with is still in use in certain variations has been fitted with rockets to allow it to take off from a football field a aircraft carrier with a catapult launch system is cake for a c-130.
thiekeman11 8 months ago
That's a whole mess of porn being delivered right there.
joseg2143 8 months ago 41
I find this video hard to masturbate to
kurruptt1 8 months ago
@kurruptt1
lol no one gave you a thumbs up you little meme bitch
TurkishHegemony 7 months ago
@TurkishHegemony
What a cry baby... you get angst over you tube video comments? What has the world come to.
kurruptt1 7 months ago
Greased it right on in!!!! SWEEEEEET!!!
Landotter1 8 months ago
that is awesome
Nicarider182 9 months ago
Yup they did it a crazy 20 times the aircraft is at Pensacola NAS Navy Aviation Museum
trevracing77 9 months ago
It would be cool to put a forward firing mac gun on that thing, trouble is...... Do magnetic cannons recoil?
Aspire198 9 months ago
All the stuff that the Air Force do to freakin C-130s...they should put rail attachments on them...like a gun...and have me buy one....i can put a Holographic sight on my C-130....haha
spongy2me 9 months ago
Amazing, never thought C -130 could land on any carriers.
egyptianminor 10 months ago 2
Jato
nvrl8inav8 11 months ago
ok now take it off :D
nick13blue 11 months ago
yeah not alot of problems that could happen here lol
1bearcatf8f 1 year ago
to all those putting up questions here how the C130 took off again - how about, after watching the video "C130 carrier landing, taking a look at "C130 carrier take off". it's at the bar to your right hand side. now, isn't that a solution?
spiller212 1 year ago
its easy to land a c-130. solution fly in to the wind with the carrier driving into the wind at the same time!
xXMaJORsONXx100 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my dad was on that carrier
zachmeaux34 1 year ago
The pilot must have very big balls :))
townstar1 1 year ago 2
The catapult in a Carrier can throw a car 16 kms :D
biipbiip94 1 year ago
Carrier Has Arrived
Neowolf882 1 year ago
is it AC-130? x_X im confused
enzkie044 1 year ago
@enzkie044 No it said in the video its a C-130 F but they are both variations of the Lockheed C-130 Hercules
Ranger950 1 year ago
@enzkie044 you play too much call of duty
bobby5574 1 year ago
It takes off by reversing, pushing the throttle forwards, and then pulling back on the stick, doesn't need the catapult or anything, Hercs have insanely short take off distance
hbhbhbhb 1 year ago
Ok, Now how is it suppose to take off?
TheAdolfHparodies 1 year ago
ok, how big was the deck, cause the wingspan of a Hercules is huge.
killergeek123 1 year ago
Is this the largest plane to land on a carrier?
U3X6785 1 year ago
Ok , that's frick'n awsome.
Now how do the plan to take off again ?
Herbymac0811 1 year ago 174
@Herbymac0811 Launch.
CubesForAKid 1 year ago
@CubesForAKid I know the Hurk has a short take off distance but it aint that short, and there's no way the cat is gonna throw that thing off the deck and into the air .
Herbymac0811 1 year ago
@CubesForAKid I take back what I just said !
Herbymac0811 1 year ago
@Herbymac0811 JATO bottles (Jet Assisted Take Off)
Flash75able 1 year ago
@Herbymac0811 Actually, they just did a normal takeoff without cats or anything.
pulsejet1 1 year ago
@Herbymac0811 from the catapult
psychopath234 1 year ago
@Herbymac0811 Steam Powered Catapults. the same that launch the F/A 18, E2 Hawkeye, P3 Orion, EA6-B Prowler off the Flight deck. I am ABH3 (Aviation Boatswains mate, Handling, 3rd class Petty Officer) in the U.S. Navy. in short, an aircraft director. i've directed all these aircraft i mentioned to launches and to parking after landing hundreds of times. i've done it for 4 years so far, I'm 23 and I'm making it my career. It never gets boring!
naamanb 1 year ago
@Herbymac0811 The C-130 was tested for carrier operations, and while it was possible to use it together with carriers, it was deemed to risky.
getous 1 year ago
@Herbymac0811 most likly alot of headwind
1bearcatf8f 1 year ago
@Herbymac0811 Look in the related videos, :PpPpPpPp
Marcus666Sund 11 months ago
@Herbymac0811 people look I love airplanes, I know they got it back in the air again there is a video showing it ! The comment was written as a joke !
Herbymac0811 11 months ago
@Herbymac0811 I think they take it back to shore to take off again or else they amp up the pressure on the slingshot and hope for the best
Extra300SRedBull 11 months ago
@Extra300SRedBull If the carrier does 40 kts into a 20 kt headwind the C130 could probably take off with like 20 kts additional airspeed.
Theriomalstrom 11 months ago
@Herbymac0811 They call that a JATO takeoff.
Helge129 10 months ago
@Helge129 They didn't have JATO back then though.
11Sparky111 9 months ago
@11Sparky111 JATO has been around since WW2, or WW1 even.
Helge129 9 months ago
@Herbymac0811 Back it up and go. There was no arresting gear or provisions for catapult bridals, nor JATO bottles. There should be a video of the whole operation if you look. From what I remember these were all light weight trials. I wonder how it would go fully loaded.
jpatt1000 8 months ago
@Herbymac0811 STEAM POWERED CATAPULT......
DiEGO2DaBAY 8 months ago
@DiEGO2DaBAY Nope. Watch the other video. All they did was go to the back of the deck, turn the ship into the wind, both ship and plane went to full power, and off the deck it went =)
Herbymac0811 8 months ago
@Herbymac0811 mabe it`s stil on that aircraft carrier
redalert2fan2 8 months ago
@Herbymac0811 Catapults, there built into the deck. Can sling most planes from 0-150 in around 2 seconds
snooter28 7 months ago
@snooter28 Actually a C-130 has no Launch bar in the front, they more than likely used JATO or Jet Assisted Take Off rockets to aid it in getting back in the air.
TheSoloPilot 7 months ago
@snooter28 Wow, I'm pretty sure the catapults are meant for smaller planes not for an Hercules.
starbreez3 6 months ago
@starbreez3 Well I'm sure they can use it to assist the plane with taking off, It alone cant do it, but with the engine, some rockets assisting, and the catapult. They probably could.
snooter28 6 months ago
@snooter28 Well I think you're right! Look at the right and you'll find the video of this same aircraft taking off on this same carrier :-).
starbreez3 6 months ago
@Herbymac0811 Look I get it ok. I wrote my first comment as a joke.
Herbymac0811 7 months ago
@Herbymac0811 JATO!
DocGorilla 7 months ago
@DocGorilla nope find the other video. normal take off.
Herbymac0811 7 months ago
@Herbymac0811 It gets pulled back and shot right away... with the catapult!
qtight 6 months ago
@qtight Nope. find the other video for it. all the did was turn the boat into the wind, went to full power with the plane and it left the deck all by its self.
Herbymac0811 6 months ago
@Herbymac0811 130 likes lol
djlee025 6 months ago
@Herbymac0811 JATO. Google it.
BeC0o1 5 months ago
@Herbymac0811 might use JATO i dont know im 15 and learning so im not sure haha.
11951miguel 5 months ago
@Herbymac0811 JATO my friend.
laslos3 4 months ago
@Herbymac0811 JATO my friend.
laslos3 4 months ago
@laslos3 JAPANESE ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANISATION?
gregboyds 4 months ago
@gregboyds jet assisted take off
laslos3 4 months ago
@laslos3 No JATO was used for launching the Herc they deck ran it. Jato wound cause to much damage to the flight deck so it wasn't considered.
lindo745 4 months ago
@Herbymac0811 Winds! & how do you think he landing a C130 going 75 KNTS without stalling??????? Winds!
sashman3988 3 months ago
@sashman3988 not really, C130 stall speed is 85 - 90 knots. The carrier steaming into the wind can easily reduce the actual approach speed by 20 knots or more. Coupled with the fact that the C130 can push the prope to negative pitch, makes this a lot easier than it appears.
Allanvh5150 3 months ago
@Herbymac0811
Said the carrier captain xDDD
GabrielKnight636 3 months ago
@Herbymac0811 look at the side bar theres a vid of it :)
mrswagerondeckk 3 months ago
Very interesting how he planing to takeoff...
vvzpanda 1 year ago
Lt. Commander Steel Ball?
samborlon 1 year ago
Worked on the "Roof" and never saw saw that!
granthemenway 1 year ago
now takeoff....
TheSoloPilot 1 year ago
But will it blend?
jajkic0732 1 year ago 138
@jajkic0732 LOL!
Zynkthe1st 1 year ago
@jajkic0732 no cuz the C-130 is too epic to be blended
cheesecakeslash 8 months ago
I bet that pilot was sweating like Robert Hayes in the movie "Airplane" during that landing approach!
cowellwannabe71 1 year ago
i takes off into wind no catapiult required
datzfast 1 year ago
They use the jet packs..........right
MrRicmarc 1 year ago
It probably had an catupult attached or had to use the whole deck to takeoff
robinj97 1 year ago
Its the C-130 which landed on the USS Forestall (CV-59) right? The Aircraft is currently preserved.
delanyify 1 year ago
wow...thats impressive
jcreature 1 year ago
Credible Sport version of C-130 might be able to take off of that.
TheKrimsonKore 1 year ago
With C-130 doing that, we now need to land the C-5 on aircraft carriers!
USAFFuturePilot 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
German propaganda is spreading that Germany gives so very much money to international organizations or foreign countries. Oviously this money is spend to infiltrate other countries to gain influence. So watch out for german snitchers.
The German BND tortured my brother Markus Bott during five and a half years. He was assassinated on 11.7.09 because of our homepage.
wwwtotalitaerde 1 year ago
narrator : ''we have a clean 130L landing,so...'' boom kaboom! plane + carrier blown up and sank lol
HUMONGASOUR 1 year ago
@HUMONGASOUR seriously? that is not funny
mdc2296 1 year ago
@mdc2296 oh...
HUMONGASOUR 1 year ago
@HUMONGASOUR just kidding!
mdc2296 1 year ago
His name was Stovall? I don't know who picked that guy for the job, but I admire his sense of humour.
YoungJim409 1 year ago
lol i bet he had parking breaks on.
Tantago 1 year ago
wow.... i didnt think it was really possible. damn son. this guy got some serious balls to attempt that.
biggestfallout3fan 1 year ago
The C-130 is just one of those designs where everything went right. You see a lot of accidents with them, but they are put into situations that would crush lesser airframes. The REALLY funny part is that Airbus is just marketing a similar design.
sdremish 1 year ago
@sdremish An old plane design but still being used for a reason.
gcord21 1 year ago
so it is smaller than i thought it was
callofdutyguy9 1 year ago
@callofdutyguy9 yes, it is. it looks alot bigger than it actually is, judging that ive been in one, but its still pretty huge.
shadowgunsxfrompaper 1 year ago
ballz of steel indeed :O
enkopingsbo 1 year ago
You can see the rest of this video here.... watch?v=BjNyQvhsQE8
You will see it takeoff.
wReCktangle 1 year ago
@wReCktangle
that's right. C-130 can take off the carrier.
Fantastic!
I don't believe in gracvity any more))
3798790 1 year ago
he just beat all of my short landings i had ever done,GOOD JOB
stealhty1 1 year ago
wow big cojones!!! Cheers to the pilots!!!
joanllabres1234567 1 year ago
watch?v=97rSobuKBxI
wReCktangle 1 year ago
It probably could take off with Rocket assistance, which the C-130 has... go look it up. The blue angles demonstrate it at their airshows.
wReCktangle 1 year ago
@wReCktangle its not on all C-130s there modified
dewky1234 1 year ago
@wReCktangle yes we all know about Jato on the C-130 and many others..........
SixxKicks 1 year ago
@SixxKicks Yeah anyway in the video I was pointing to, the C-130 takes off easily WITHOUT JATO. That was the point.
wReCktangle 1 year ago
now take off. lol !!!
111meikle 1 year ago
Now that was impressive!
MrJohn49g 1 year ago
i bet the pilot was shitting himself
tomelement251 1 year ago
btw did they catapult it off the carrier... or did they have to use a crane to get it out of there??
:D
skazhiprivet 1 year ago
@skazhiprivet might need a crane and some disassembly, the largest bomber that can take off is probably limited to the B-24.
R5H4D0W 1 year ago
Ok now I want to see a 747 landing on the carrier!
:P
skazhiprivet 1 year ago
I had to watch that like 10 times. Man, he barely got on the deck by 20, 25 feet. Guess he needed the whole thing. I'm looking for a vid showing the F-111A doing a takeoff/ landing from a carrier during it's early development before the USAF took it. Does such a video exist?
jonesy97 1 year ago
@jonesy97
Sure you didn't mean the F111B?
watch?v=V9iEAPQoJgI
meowmeowfishfish 1 year ago
@meowmeowfishfish Yes, sir, you are correct. It was the B model. There were several obvious feature differences between the Navy B and the USAF A model. Shorter Radar dome and aviaonics bay, for one. Good catch, thanks.
jonesy97 1 year ago
@jonesy97 Yes, look under F-111B or F-14 part 1. It was canceled after the Grumman started building the mighty Tomcat. F-111 was an Air Force bomber, so I think it wouldn't have worked out
xTomcatsForeverVF84x 1 year ago
@xTomcatsForeverVF84x Thx. I finally found a vid of carrier trials for the F-111. The USAF had not accepted yet, but yes, the Tomcat was soon to follow. Btw, love the F-15E's all over your home page. Glad to see you like the good 'ol Air Force, too! I used to be a weapons Systems Specialist on the F-111D and F models.
jonesy97 1 year ago