Great miler, Steve Scott, but he never went for broke in the Olympics like he often did in other races. Coe and Ovett, on the other hand, both are Olympic gold medalists.
Scott is my idol. Im reading his book "The Miler." To be honest i didnt know who he was but im glad i found his book. Im going for my school record in the mile and i think reading this book will help me.
Scott was just as good as Coe or Ovett...with Scott wanting to race anyone and Coe and Ovett ducking him in races or anyone that might be on the same level.
@cobramanphil: Scott was a great runner and a greater competitor, but clearly not "just as good as Coe or Ovett". All you have to do is to compare times, world records, gold medals, head-to-head records, etc.
Please--To assert these facts is not to deny Scott's ability or likeability. I'm a fan of Steve Scott: he was a great runner, and by all accounts is a great guy.
@ilikesex67 . "Scott was too methodical, patient, and surgical to be a champion or world record setter. Didn't have the guts to go for it on his own, pace be damned. Too much a follower"
Well, he wasn't the Carl Lewis of the mile; he didn't take drugs! Good as he was, he wasn't quite the calibre of Coe, Ovett, Cram. Just outside these guys
Scott was as fast as Coe: he ran a 3:47 in Oslo in '82... he just didn't produce in championships like the brits. Same Calibre, no hardware. That's the diff.
@knightsxc06 The difference is that 3:47 was probably close to Scott's limit. Coe ran only 3 one mile races between 1978 & 1983, all world records, the last one off poor pacing. Scott probably ran more like 33 miles in that same period. Who do you think had more opportunity to run as close to their potential as possible? Scott was eventually faster than Ovett over a Mile, doesn't mean he was better than Ovett at his peak. Both Ovett & Coe were capable of substantially faster than 3:47.
Re comment below...must be pat porter... Xcountry master during that era!
chefrobp 1 month ago
my roommate in Seoul in 1988
prporter1 2 months ago
Great miler, Steve Scott, but he never went for broke in the Olympics like he often did in other races. Coe and Ovett, on the other hand, both are Olympic gold medalists.
Bravo6Whiskey 5 months ago
Thats my track coach woop woop!!
Ar9210 6 months ago
Comment removed
brigibas 9 months ago
I have scotts authograph
Majopiano 9 months ago
Scott is my idol. Im reading his book "The Miler." To be honest i didnt know who he was but im glad i found his book. Im going for my school record in the mile and i think reading this book will help me.
TheIndycoltsfan17 10 months ago
Scott was just as good as Coe or Ovett...with Scott wanting to race anyone and Coe and Ovett ducking him in races or anyone that might be on the same level.
cobramanphil 11 months ago
@cobramanphil: Scott was a great runner and a greater competitor, but clearly not "just as good as Coe or Ovett". All you have to do is to compare times, world records, gold medals, head-to-head records, etc.
Please--To assert these facts is not to deny Scott's ability or likeability. I'm a fan of Steve Scott: he was a great runner, and by all accounts is a great guy.
gpc31 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ilikesex67 . "Scott was too methodical, patient, and surgical to be a champion or world record setter. Didn't have the guts to go for it on his own, pace be damned. Too much a follower"
An astoundingly uninsightful statement.
oldjoe5 1 year ago
He's me coach at San Marcos(:
katelynXCforlife 1 year ago
@katelynXCforlife
california right?
sjd2112 1 year ago
@katelynXCforlife thats one of my main reasons im applying to san marcos
123Bloodmeat 1 year ago
There is no way Scott was in the same class as Ovett or Coe, and Cram for that matter. He was good but no chance in this.
martynhanson 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
STATISTICS CALCULATION - from
BR-0 com/olympics htm
tietajajoshua 2 years ago
he was never boxed in. he said they expected the leading kenyan to die off!
mamowolde 2 years ago
Well, he wasn't the Carl Lewis of the mile; he didn't take drugs! Good as he was, he wasn't quite the calibre of Coe, Ovett, Cram. Just outside these guys
bootymanager 2 years ago
Scott was as fast as Coe: he ran a 3:47 in Oslo in '82... he just didn't produce in championships like the brits. Same Calibre, no hardware. That's the diff.
knightsxc06 2 years ago
@knightsxc06 The difference is that 3:47 was probably close to Scott's limit. Coe ran only 3 one mile races between 1978 & 1983, all world records, the last one off poor pacing. Scott probably ran more like 33 miles in that same period. Who do you think had more opportunity to run as close to their potential as possible? Scott was eventually faster than Ovett over a Mile, doesn't mean he was better than Ovett at his peak. Both Ovett & Coe were capable of substantially faster than 3:47.
deano27671 1 year ago 2
Steve Scott is the man. The Carl Lewis of the 1500 and mile. Too bad he was boxed-in by the kenyans in the 1988 1500 final.
warren09121971 3 years ago