@SlyBoxer But am I still delusional if I agree with him because he's using bigger words? No matter... he's winning because he is more intelligent and makes a more convincing case. Don't feel bad about this! It's like the last time you had a crush on a guy only to find out that he's normal and likes women. Sometimes that's just the way the cookie crumbles. LOL
@SlyBoxer Actually, I had the baby with your mother. She's your half sister now and you can call me daddy if you want. One more thing.... Most people won't admit to enjoying riding mopeds, but like fat women, they're fun to ride if nobody's looking. LOL
@SlyBoxer Most people who know me know that I'm a motherfucker so your hypothesis has some merit. And..... this is a video with a fat chick and we're all on it bashing each other. Who amongst us doesn't mind riding a moped? LOL
@JaleelJohanson62 This guy SlyBoxer has no concept of the basic rules of logic. He probably doesn't even understand that I'm using induction, not deduction, in this rather surreal exchange between him and myself. Yes, he's brought me close to tears in this debate: the same kind of tears I almost came to watching The Hangover :-)
@SlyBoxer Your distinction between the rules of a high school debate club and the "real world" of debate amuses me (as do you in general). Sure, in the "real" world epithets can abound in "real" debates but it's also generally understood in the selfsame "real" world that the first person to resort to an epithet does so as a result of running out of ideas to counteract his opponent's ideas. You counter my points by ignoring them entirely or setting up strawmen to "demolish."
@SlyBoxer Sorry for my delay. I've been in therapy and I'm heavily sedated because of all the pain your intellectual superiority has caused me. Have mercy on me master! All your fine points of logic (ad hominem, strawman, circular reasoning) have left me scarred for life. In fact, you're so clever you even almost proven I've reversed myself against my own point (we know that almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, right o' master?)...
@SlyBoxer I never once assumed that everyone should have the same tastes as I do, and I never believed anyone should have the same tastes. Your religious/atheist analogy doesn't apply to this debate btw. Religion and atheism are something we choose. Taste in the opposite sex, for better or worse, is something we become aware of. You've just added false analogy to your list of logical fallacies...Congrats! Soon you'll cover every textbook reasoning error by name...keep up the good work.
@SlyBoxer Perhaps you shouldn't have answered my question after all. You claim I have no right to tell say what anyone else is feeling yet you can tell what *I* feel due to an in depth reading of my thoughts. Wow, like i said you must have a supernatural ability that I don't have...wait maybe some of your power is rubbing of on me master (yes, I called you master...are you familiar with the concept of mockery, btw?)...I sense a bit of frustration on your part, nah, just my imagination I guess!
@SlyBoxer Let me get this straight: "You did not admit defeat like I ordered you, so for that reason you have lied." Dude, are you serious? I lied *because* I did not admit defeat when I was ordered?!? This no longer feels like a SyFy Original but more like an episode of Seinfeld. I'm lying because I didn't admit defeat when you ordered me?!? Are you in need of some thorozine? Btw, the logical error you just committed is known as "non sequiter" trans. "It does not follow."
@SlyBoxer Um, dude, let me explain something to you. When I called you master more than once I was being sarcastic. Do you understand the concept of sarcasm? I was being facetious the whole time. I was being (as it turns out, cruel) a smart ass, a wise guy, a "fucking prick" as you put it. I was being mean. I sincerely hope you understand the idea behind me calling you my master (if you don't you're in worse shape than I thought).
@SlyBoxer I was being sarcastic when I called you master. Did you really believe I'd call someone who has no concept of logic "master" other than in the most abject mockery? You're no one's master, you have no understanding of even the most basic notions of logic. You can't set traps, you can't avoid traps, you just pretend your ignorance is knowledge. Remember, I said you were an amusement to me, and that's all you've been to date - nothing more.
@SlyBoxer It's insulting that I claim you're aping me yet you have a big smirk. That's curious dude, a smirk while being insulted. Are you some kind of verbal humiliation fetishist? (Now that's a real knee slapper!) You really thought I was serious when I called you master? You have no debating ability whatsoever. Like I said, you just move the way I move, slide the way I slide...well, you get the picture. Go eat a banana there Cheetah. Each snowflake is unique btw - they're all special.
@SlyBoxer Are you on thorozine, and if you are do you forget to take it? You're saying it doesn't matter whether I was being sarcastic or not when I admitted you're my master? Don't you see I was mocking you when I called you my master? Dude, I was laughing when I said that. For crying out loud you're the most intellectually incoherent person I've met on the Net. Your mind is like a can of alphabet soup - all the letters are there but they don't spell anything. You're pitiful to say the least...
@SlyBoxer Making an issue out of typos is a sign of running on fumes. Yes, I meant Thorazine, the antipsychotic drug. And no I didn't major in psychology, and if I did I wouldn't be able to prescribe it anyway. Only psychiatrists can prescribe drugs dude. Psychologists can't. And yes, sarcasm is an acceptable rebuttal in a debate as long as it points to a defect in an opponent's argument and is *not* an ad hominem tactic (which I've gone over at length, in vain I fear) (That's good sarcasm!)
@SlyBoxer Quality is more important than quantity my megalomanical friend. Btw, psychiatrists do take some psychology in school but remember psychiatrists have medical degrees, psychologist don't. That means psychiatrists can prescribe medications whereas psychologists can't. It's not surprising that you didn't know this. Btw, I've proven i know how to spell thorazine (which you could use) because I spelled it right earlier.
@SlyBoxer What lack of understanding do you speak of? I knew psychiatrists take psychology courses. They wouldn't be of much use if they didn't. Because they have MDs though, they do tend to rely on drugs a bit much (but in your case thorazine would be called for...) Btw, I spelled it correctly before you brought the issue up.
@SlyBoxer You have no routine, dude. Other than to copy me and then pretend you have a master routine. That's about all you've got. All you're doing is repeating what I said first, and nothing more. It's a matter of record on this thread that I said you're nothing but an amusement to me, and anyone who checks for him or herself will see this to be true.
@SlyBoxer I was the one who called *you* master first, in a vein of total mockery and sarcasm that any reader of this thread would pick up on. Your so-called "master routine" is just something you're improvising now and claiming, retroactively, that it was part of some plan. Again you show your inability to think ahead by taking my mockery and trying to conspicuously morph it into some "plan." Dude, you're so transparent.
@SlyBoxer It's funny that you keep accusing me of going over the same points all the time because you keep making the false charge, over and over again, that I'm claiming all men like buff women. I've never said or implied anything of the sort on this thread and you've failed to present any credible evidence to support your contention. What I inform jackwads like TheDezmona of is the contradictions between their words and actions. That's all I did...
@SlyBoxer Again, you've failed to produce any evidence that I assume all men like buff women. That faxt is that i don't make that assumption at all. I recognize that tastes indeed vary, with some men liking ectomorphs, some liking mesomorphs, some liking endomorphs, and others liking the points between these archetypes. My whole point is and ever has been a contradiction between a stated taste in women and actions - a concept you've failed to grasp in this thread so far...
@SlyBoxer That's right, you provided me with no evidence at all. Claims of evidence aren't evidence dude. I never said anything, anywhere resembling the notion that all guys should have my taste in women. In fact I've said the opposite. My beef with that goof TheDezmona was based on an entirely different premise, and I've made it clear what that premise was. You have no direct quote, other than something you'll probably make up.
@SlyBoxer Sorry but that statement in no way implies that I think all men should have my taste in women. All that quote means is that *one* particular sod's action contradicted his words. That in no way implies that all men have the same taste in women or that all men should have my taste in women. I just pointed out that the word and deed go hand in hand, a concept that still eludes you (not surprisingly...)
@SlyBoxer Lol, yes, "Sirius2in.Stiffy" has some SERIOUS mental issues. He/she (or he-she) has been trying to prove me wrong now for I'd say about, hmm.. a YEAR now! Any regrets on my part for feeding that troll? No. It's been fun embarrassing that enlarged clit worshipping feminist with alzheimers. We have a special relationship going on. I laugh at "its" comments while "it" has someone to talk/write to. I'm guessing you two have the same deal going on. Well, have fun...
@SexualStrat Strat, Strat, my buddy Strat. What is your obsession wih androgyny anyway? Why do you dwell on the subject of heshes? Are you having some gender confusion issues Strat? The only one you've ever embarassed is yourself Strat...make no mistake about that.
@sirius212ify "The fetish lover can't have people hating his ladies." ... "I think your fetish is getting the better of you" ... "do you even read what I write, or are you so caught up in yourself that you're just arguing against you?" ... "Obviously you won't accept being wrong even now, but I can't help but wonder why you continue trying to prove yourself to me. I know I'm right, so what purpose are you trying to fullfil now?"<-- THIS! All rings true.
@SlyBoxer Apparently your as ignorant of history as you are of logic. The ectomorph body type being the ideal look is relatively new. Twiggy and the British fashion industry created in in 1967, and the buff look already began to challenge it by the 1980s. The "ideal" look comes and goes. 20 years from now IBBF Fitness and Figure Competitors could be the ideal look. Btw, the skinnier look is already on its way out. Take a look at the muscles on Katie Couric, Brooke Shields, etc.
@SlyBoxer Apparently the concept of actions speaking louder than words is beyond your intellectual grasp. TheDezmona knew exactly what he was going to see. These videos are grouped by topic. If he wanted to look at Kate Moss he would've never navigated to these muscle women videos. Some guys who like buff women are afraid to admit it. This grouping of video ain't the place for guys who like the runway models. TheDezmona would've never made it here in the first place.
@SlyBoxer Dude, I was wondering when you were going to employ psychobabble to support your case. And that's all the "YouTube effect" is - lame psychobabble.I watch videos because I know what I like and I watch what I like - period. Btw, I'll get back to your numerous (and dubious) points later. You certainly have a lot of free time on your hands don't you, lol! Moreover, if I'm such a loser then you're curiously bent competing with a loser...think about it :-)
@SlyBoxer Dude, you're funny. I mean major funny. Much of my enterprise in the world outside of YouTube (the real one) is conflict with people who really are smart, not guys who hide behind their computers and brag about how smart they are. These are people who are the real opinion makers, not just little Walter Mittys who couldn't hang in there with a smart college freshman. I'm currently dealing with peeps who really have notches on their proverbial guns, not faceless keyboard fantasizers
@SlyBoxer "I've already invited you to come chat, but you do so at your own risk." And you're not very civil w/people who insult you to boot. Not only are you a wannabe, but a hypocrite as well. You've insulted me during this whole thread and I just laughed it off. Did I touch a nerve? Do you want to set the rules and then not play by them?
@SlyBoxer Sure you stand behind your words - with threats of violence. That's the only way wannabes like you can ever win - is to threaten your opposition with violence. That's how your kind operates because on a even playing field you can never prevail.
@SlyBoxer You're just a wannabe, despite all your huffing and puffing. Your kung fu sucks so bad I doubt if you could even get a letter to the editor published. Powerless against you? You're nothing ace. Just another joker who comes up with a rather pathetic handle like SlyBoxer and has to rely on threats of violence because you have no substantive intellect. I've seen your type before. You want to be opinion makers but the only thing you can make to convince people of anything is a fist.
@SlyBoxer I'm glad you've identified yourself as a Net troll. Net trolls are wannabes. They get their ass kicked in debates in the real world so they come here to prove themselves against what they perceive to be other trolls. I made my bones in the real world so like I said, this is just entertainment to me. It's fun to watch pathetic megalomanics like yourself live in your cyber fantasy world. Keep on dreaming. You're just another thug who thinks he's clever.
@SlyBoxer Fight with the God? You're an intellectual pygmy with a thug ethos. Am I fuming? No, actually I kind of pity you. All this self-deification would make you a laughingstock in the real world. All you do is brag about an intellect which, frankly, I've seen exceded by drunks in bars. And I'm talking about guys who were totally shitfaced too, not just after a few nips. You don't know anything about setting traps. You merely claim to set them.
@SlyBoxer I'm indeed fighting with a God I am? Well, the arrogance of a mere mortal like myself jousting with a god! Silly me, I know not my place! Oh the silliness of mere mortals such as myself! We do not know who are superiors are, so we go blaspheming against such great deities as yourself! Oh great God, can you find pity toward such an inferior mortal as myself?
@SlyBoxer I'm not a troll. I don't make a hobby out of going on the Net and living in fantasy world where I set myself up as some cyber god because I can't cut it in the real world. In the real world I'm a published author ace, so I'm no wannabe. I put myself out there. I'm able to write more than just a silly blurb on YouTube. Sure, once in a while someone writes something dumb and I nail him to the wall. I don't really take pride in it because it's not my primary m.o.
@SlyBoxer As for being off topic, *you* were the one who directed this discourse to your greatness. I merely obliged you. Btw, my earlier question stands. How can you be laughing at me yet fuming with rage over my insults. How can you be mad and laughing at the same time? Are you some kind of a schizo? Are you alternately going Grrrr...hahaha...Grrrr...hahaha...I believe lithium is prescribed for that sort of thing you know.
@SlyBoxer I'm glad you take pride in being a Net troll though. Because that's all you'll ever be. Some guy who uses a lame moniker like "SlyBoxer" and expends all his creativity in 500 character YouTube blurbs. Take a good look at this page Mr. God. This is where you're going to stay. This is the limit of your abilities. Here's your kingdom oh mighty deity, I hope you're comfortable with it, because it's as far as you'll ever go.
@SlyBoxer You avoided my question. Why do you say I make you laugh yet if I met you in person I'd be at risk of being decked? I like people who make me laugh, I certainly would never want to pulverize them. Do you like to hurt people who make you laugh? Are you a sadist? Or, as I suggested before, are you a schizo? Maybe you should look into some lithium for that. Do you alternately laugh and fume with rage? Lithium works wonders for that I hear...
@SlyBoxer You avoided it completely because you can't explain why you'd want to beat someone who makes you laugh without exposing yourself as a psycho (which I believe you are). As to the question are you going to cry some more, if you really knew anything about logic you'd know that question is a complex question fallacy (look it up).
@SlyBoxer Of course you'll be here forever. You've got no where else to go. This is the limit of your ability: 500 character blurbs and your little cyber god troll trip. You'll never go beyond this little cyber fantasy realm so of course you're going to be here forever. Like I said, I don't generally look for conflict here, but occasionally it comes my way either by my choice or someone like yourself who, claims to deity aside, have a compulsion to compete w/those they think of as losers...
@SlyBoxer I never pushed my "fetish" on others, and I don't see how taste in women is necessarily a fetish. Be that as it may, every screed I responded too was someone who visited a buff woman vid. I didn't go to a Kate Moss video and tell somebody "Hey, you should like buff women!" No, I just take issue w/guys who like the same women as me but don't have the stones to admit it. It shouldn't be a hard concept to grasp, but in your case...
@SlyBoxer You have a talent for missing the point (let's keep a good thing going)! I don't care if they hate these women or not. My beef isn't with people who don't like buff women. My beef is with guys who like them but they want to stay in the closet. I will point out that notion "muscles are only for men" squashes itself because it's part of the human body and therefore a self-contradictory statement is rendered. Other than that, people don't go out of their way to look at the unattractive.
@SlyBoxer Some life you got there, dude. Destroying know-it-alls on YouTube. Wow, you are some kind of a god I guess - in your own mind. I don't generally look for conflict because I never log on to this with the conscious intent of starting an argument. Yes, exposing closet buff women lovers is something I do but it's not all I do; it's not even half of what I do. You see only what you want to see, not the whole picture. That's something I learned about you at the beginning of this dialogue.
@SlyBoxer I suppose the difference between a fetish and taste is a metaphysical question. I prefer brunettes to blondes, so I guess that qualifies as a black hair fetish. Nonetheless, you're attempt to stereotype me as someone who jacks off to vids like this is just another example of your narrow thinking. I never jacked off to this video once. Btw, your crusade against know-it-alls on YouTube has taken the form of wanting to be the biggest know-it-all of them all - yes, a cyber God. Ironic?!?
@SlyBoxer Btw, if you think this silly crusade of yours is stopping me from nailing hypocrites like TheDezmona I can reassure you that I'm just going to keep a good thing going...
@SlyBoxer I'll be back shortly to deal with the bug after battling some dragons. In the mean time try to grow some real claws and teeth, and breathe some real fire instead of blowing smoke.
@SlyBoxer Want a better comeback? Well here's one: I'll bet you always find better insults in bathroom stalls at the sketchy side of town - especially at all male adult theaters...lol!!! You walked right into that one dude:-)
@SlyBoxer Your statement that I'd come chat w/you at my own risk tells me something about you. Since you already said I won't be any different in person than on this page, your invitation to meet me in person has an agenda of violence behind it. Since I'd be meeting you at my own risk, I can only conclude that your intentions are hostile - which is outside the scope of a legit debate. My so-called "tough guy" attitude only extends intellectual exchange - nothing else.
@SlyBoxer You know numbnuts, I have to rethink my earlier position about you being a maggot who hides behind his computer. I may have been sorely mistaken, since you told me I'd meet you in person at my own risk. You may be a psycho. You tell me all I'm going to accomplish is inviting you to endless comedy, yet I'm also going to be at risk of violence because I insulted you. Are you laughing, or gritting your teeth in rage? Or are you doing both alternately...grrr...lol...grrr...lol...
@SlyBoxer No you haven't upset me at all. You're sort of like a sideshow act to me now, or more like a mental patient. Your doubletalk is still intact I see. You claim to laughing at me yet I've insulted you to the point of violence. Well, are you angry or are you laughing? Or are you one of those schizos who laugh uncontrollably one moment and then grit your teeth in anger the next? Are you in need of a rubber room?!?
@SlyBoxer Everything "supports" your argument because you define your position as truth. Your whole argument style is one of pure circularity which, btw, is the oldest debater's tactic in the proverbial book. That's how I know you know nothing about the real world of debating. Ever true debater knows that trick and if we were to meet in front of a class of graduate philosophy students (my forum) you'd be exposed as the total intellectual fraud that you are.
@SlyBoxer As to your question why am I still here? You amuse me as always...your megalomania is, shall we say, an amusing contrast to your ineptitude...:-)
@SlyBoxer All you've done is copy me from the start. I called you master because you're frankly, as I said, an episode of Seinfeld to me. I was the one who declared you to be an amusement first, by comparing you to SyFy Originals and Seinfeld. That's a matter of record on this thread, and it also proves you've been aping me this whole time. Hey Cheetah, have another banana...
@SlyBoxer You're just another Net pseudointellectual who hides behind silly monikers like "Slyboxer" and have no clue about the structure of logic (case in point: my whole argument against TheDezmona was inductive, not deductive). You're "kung fu" wouldn't cut it in a high school debate. You remind me of another clueless soul "godofcriticism." You're right about one thing though: I'll never live this down because I'll never know why I couldn't find better amusement than some cyber-wannabe.
@SlyBoxer Hmmmm...I'm an arrogant YouTuber, I think I know everything, i think everyone is inferior,...?!? I hate to say this, but I suggest you don't take too close of a look in the mirror. I merely think before I say something, that hardly makes me superior to anyone else. If any arrogance (albeit mindless) has been shown here, it's demonstrated by your laughable claims of victory and my mental scars you left me with. What am I whining about btw? This is recreation to me.
@SlyBoxer Once again you're aping me Cheetah (have a banana). I was the one who first said you're an amusement to me and that's a matter of record on this thread. As to your claim of being superior to everyone else, you're another one of those pathetic little cyber intellectual wannabes who hide behind anonymity and pretend to be smart. I've been out there in the real world, dude - where people know my name, see my face, and hear my voice. Like I said, your kung fu sux.
@SlyBoxer I admire your passion for debate but I really must insist that you learn the actual rules of logic instead of making your own rules up as you go along. While this now seems like a Seinfeld episode, I can see where I might start feeling like an intellectual bully soon. Then again, since I'm an asshole, a fucking prick, a loser, etc. I suppose I'd be in character assuming that role...
@SlyBoxer These aren't my rules of logic, I didn't invent them. They were developed back in the Greco-Roman world - long before my time dude. Why do you think they originally have Latin names? Why do you think the personal attack is called ad hominem which is Latin for "against the man?" Why do you think the question begging fallacy is known in Latin as "petitio principii?" I didn't invent these rules, I just play by them. I suggest you learn them - Net obscurity won't save you in a live debate.
@SlyBoxer Remember, I was the one who told you that you're an amusement to me first. That's a matter of record on this thread. You're just trying to mimic me, you're just aping me like a chimpanzee. In nature the prey mimics the predator. Learn something about the real rules of logic, not the ones you make up as you go along.
@SlyBoxer Now you're resorting to some pretty lame psychobabble because I said you were an amusement to me - first. That's a matter of record on this thread. You're just trying to mimic me and nothing more. You're now shifting your ground - big time. Now you're trying to save your derriere by claiming you were indirectly thinking of amusing yourself at my expense. I wasn't indirectly thinking anything - I directly said you're amusing me and that's a matter of record.
@SlyBoxer You're trying to slide the way I slide, jump the way I jump, jab the way I jab. It's monkey see monkey do all the way here Cheetah. You're just aping me now and trust me, I've been in enough debates to know what's happening when one arguer starts mimicing the other - the mimic has run out of ideas. Keep telling yourself you're the master...now go have a banana.
@SlyBoxer You have no traps. To set a trap you have to be able to think more than one move ahead, and not just be a mimic. You haven't demonstrated any ability to think ahead at all. All you do is regurgitate what I say and then claim you were the first to say it, but this thread's record speaks for itself. Btw, I never said everyone thinks along the same lines as I do. You're just mimicing me because you can't think along any lines, period.
@SlyBoxer I never claimed explicitly or even remotely implied I knew what TheDezmona was or is feeling. You on the other hand violated your own standard of proof by claiming that you know I'm mentally scarred. Again you avoid my question: how do you know what I'm feeling whereas I'm incapable of knowing what TheDezmona is feeling? Do you have some supernatural ability that I don't?!? You keep conveniently avoiding this question; I'd think an intellect as supreme as yours could answer it...
@SlyBoxer The concept of an empirical approach to knowledge seems to escape you. You're quoting me proves nothing, since I'm using an empirical, inductive approach to conclude that TheDezmona really likied what he saw. Like i said, actions speak louder than words. I wasn't telling him "what he should like," I was using his action as the sign post. I never told anyone what they "should like" because that would be irrational. We don't choose our taste in anything, we become aware of it.
@SlyBoxer I was the one who first said you were an amusement to me, and I compared you to a SyFy Original. That's a matter of record on this thread. Any third party can page back and see that. Yet because I didn't use the term "endless humour" your basing your argument on a mere phantom semantic difference. Actually on reflection my comparison of you to SyFy Originals was a bit unfair to that network. The scripts aren't that bad!!!
@SlyBoxer I'm providing you with "endless humour?" Wow, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. I was the one who said you were an amusement to me, and that's a matter of record on this thread. It would seem that your "much more in depth view' of my thoughts has led you to mimicry of some of my approaches. Remember my friend, it's the prey that mimics the predator in nature. Btw, I never used any big words here, or at least none that a trained logician doesn't know about...
@SlyBoxer Yes, you initiated this conversation, yet *I* was the one who told you that I find you amusing. Like I said, you're trying to rewrite the history of this thread. You're a source of entertainment to me, nothing more. Like I said, in nature the prey mimics the predator, not the other way around. You know nothing of logic, you just reason in a circle, knockdown strawmen, and make personal attacks. Frankly you're not that good. I seen smarter high school kids than you.
ewww crude...
Rosenquist1965 2 months ago
ahhhh misleading thumbnail
Createzmusic 2 months ago
You think your hot but your not , I'd love to impale you and teach you a lesson
Thefuzeman11 2 months ago
lame
LoTeZz 3 months ago
I would rape this chick
swguy2006 6 months ago
@swguy2006 i think that would be vice versa :(
Yaaaaaahh 5 months ago
@Yaaaaaahh I don't think so ;-)
swguy2006 5 months ago
I came here to jack off and 5 minutes later, I can't find the beginning of this flame war!
rickybogus 6 months ago
I have to be honest here.. sirius212ify is kicking SlyBoxer's ass in this youtube bout.
JaleelJohanson62 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer But am I still delusional if I agree with him because he's using bigger words? No matter... he's winning because he is more intelligent and makes a more convincing case. Don't feel bad about this! It's like the last time you had a crush on a guy only to find out that he's normal and likes women. Sometimes that's just the way the cookie crumbles. LOL
JaleelJohanson62 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer I just had a three year old read this exchange. She says he's winning too. LOL
JaleelJohanson62 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Actually, I had the baby with your mother. She's your half sister now and you can call me daddy if you want. One more thing.... Most people won't admit to enjoying riding mopeds, but like fat women, they're fun to ride if nobody's looking. LOL
JaleelJohanson62 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Most people who know me know that I'm a motherfucker so your hypothesis has some merit. And..... this is a video with a fat chick and we're all on it bashing each other. Who amongst us doesn't mind riding a moped? LOL
JaleelJohanson62 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Oh now be honest here..... This is a moped video.... LOL
JaleelJohanson62 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Neither should spandex in large sizes, but alas, it does... LOL
JaleelJohanson62 8 months ago
@JaleelJohanson62 This guy SlyBoxer has no concept of the basic rules of logic. He probably doesn't even understand that I'm using induction, not deduction, in this rather surreal exchange between him and myself. Yes, he's brought me close to tears in this debate: the same kind of tears I almost came to watching The Hangover :-)
sirius212ify 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Your distinction between the rules of a high school debate club and the "real world" of debate amuses me (as do you in general). Sure, in the "real" world epithets can abound in "real" debates but it's also generally understood in the selfsame "real" world that the first person to resort to an epithet does so as a result of running out of ideas to counteract his opponent's ideas. You counter my points by ignoring them entirely or setting up strawmen to "demolish."
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Sorry for my delay. I've been in therapy and I'm heavily sedated because of all the pain your intellectual superiority has caused me. Have mercy on me master! All your fine points of logic (ad hominem, strawman, circular reasoning) have left me scarred for life. In fact, you're so clever you even almost proven I've reversed myself against my own point (we know that almost only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades, right o' master?)...
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer I never once assumed that everyone should have the same tastes as I do, and I never believed anyone should have the same tastes. Your religious/atheist analogy doesn't apply to this debate btw. Religion and atheism are something we choose. Taste in the opposite sex, for better or worse, is something we become aware of. You've just added false analogy to your list of logical fallacies...Congrats! Soon you'll cover every textbook reasoning error by name...keep up the good work.
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Perhaps you shouldn't have answered my question after all. You claim I have no right to tell say what anyone else is feeling yet you can tell what *I* feel due to an in depth reading of my thoughts. Wow, like i said you must have a supernatural ability that I don't have...wait maybe some of your power is rubbing of on me master (yes, I called you master...are you familiar with the concept of mockery, btw?)...I sense a bit of frustration on your part, nah, just my imagination I guess!
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Let me get this straight: "You did not admit defeat like I ordered you, so for that reason you have lied." Dude, are you serious? I lied *because* I did not admit defeat when I was ordered?!? This no longer feels like a SyFy Original but more like an episode of Seinfeld. I'm lying because I didn't admit defeat when you ordered me?!? Are you in need of some thorozine? Btw, the logical error you just committed is known as "non sequiter" trans. "It does not follow."
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Um, dude, let me explain something to you. When I called you master more than once I was being sarcastic. Do you understand the concept of sarcasm? I was being facetious the whole time. I was being (as it turns out, cruel) a smart ass, a wise guy, a "fucking prick" as you put it. I was being mean. I sincerely hope you understand the idea behind me calling you my master (if you don't you're in worse shape than I thought).
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer I was being sarcastic when I called you master. Did you really believe I'd call someone who has no concept of logic "master" other than in the most abject mockery? You're no one's master, you have no understanding of even the most basic notions of logic. You can't set traps, you can't avoid traps, you just pretend your ignorance is knowledge. Remember, I said you were an amusement to me, and that's all you've been to date - nothing more.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer It's insulting that I claim you're aping me yet you have a big smirk. That's curious dude, a smirk while being insulted. Are you some kind of verbal humiliation fetishist? (Now that's a real knee slapper!) You really thought I was serious when I called you master? You have no debating ability whatsoever. Like I said, you just move the way I move, slide the way I slide...well, you get the picture. Go eat a banana there Cheetah. Each snowflake is unique btw - they're all special.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer Are you on thorozine, and if you are do you forget to take it? You're saying it doesn't matter whether I was being sarcastic or not when I admitted you're my master? Don't you see I was mocking you when I called you my master? Dude, I was laughing when I said that. For crying out loud you're the most intellectually incoherent person I've met on the Net. Your mind is like a can of alphabet soup - all the letters are there but they don't spell anything. You're pitiful to say the least...
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer Making an issue out of typos is a sign of running on fumes. Yes, I meant Thorazine, the antipsychotic drug. And no I didn't major in psychology, and if I did I wouldn't be able to prescribe it anyway. Only psychiatrists can prescribe drugs dude. Psychologists can't. And yes, sarcasm is an acceptable rebuttal in a debate as long as it points to a defect in an opponent's argument and is *not* an ad hominem tactic (which I've gone over at length, in vain I fear) (That's good sarcasm!)
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer Quality is more important than quantity my megalomanical friend. Btw, psychiatrists do take some psychology in school but remember psychiatrists have medical degrees, psychologist don't. That means psychiatrists can prescribe medications whereas psychologists can't. It's not surprising that you didn't know this. Btw, I've proven i know how to spell thorazine (which you could use) because I spelled it right earlier.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer What lack of understanding do you speak of? I knew psychiatrists take psychology courses. They wouldn't be of much use if they didn't. Because they have MDs though, they do tend to rely on drugs a bit much (but in your case thorazine would be called for...) Btw, I spelled it correctly before you brought the issue up.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer You have no routine, dude. Other than to copy me and then pretend you have a master routine. That's about all you've got. All you're doing is repeating what I said first, and nothing more. It's a matter of record on this thread that I said you're nothing but an amusement to me, and anyone who checks for him or herself will see this to be true.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer I was the one who called *you* master first, in a vein of total mockery and sarcasm that any reader of this thread would pick up on. Your so-called "master routine" is just something you're improvising now and claiming, retroactively, that it was part of some plan. Again you show your inability to think ahead by taking my mockery and trying to conspicuously morph it into some "plan." Dude, you're so transparent.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer It's funny that you keep accusing me of going over the same points all the time because you keep making the false charge, over and over again, that I'm claiming all men like buff women. I've never said or implied anything of the sort on this thread and you've failed to present any credible evidence to support your contention. What I inform jackwads like TheDezmona of is the contradictions between their words and actions. That's all I did...
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer Again, you've failed to produce any evidence that I assume all men like buff women. That faxt is that i don't make that assumption at all. I recognize that tastes indeed vary, with some men liking ectomorphs, some liking mesomorphs, some liking endomorphs, and others liking the points between these archetypes. My whole point is and ever has been a contradiction between a stated taste in women and actions - a concept you've failed to grasp in this thread so far...
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer That's right, you provided me with no evidence at all. Claims of evidence aren't evidence dude. I never said anything, anywhere resembling the notion that all guys should have my taste in women. In fact I've said the opposite. My beef with that goof TheDezmona was based on an entirely different premise, and I've made it clear what that premise was. You have no direct quote, other than something you'll probably make up.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Sorry but that statement in no way implies that I think all men should have my taste in women. All that quote means is that *one* particular sod's action contradicted his words. That in no way implies that all men have the same taste in women or that all men should have my taste in women. I just pointed out that the word and deed go hand in hand, a concept that still eludes you (not surprisingly...)
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Lol, yes, "Sirius2in.Stiffy" has some SERIOUS mental issues. He/she (or he-she) has been trying to prove me wrong now for I'd say about, hmm.. a YEAR now! Any regrets on my part for feeding that troll? No. It's been fun embarrassing that enlarged clit worshipping feminist with alzheimers. We have a special relationship going on. I laugh at "its" comments while "it" has someone to talk/write to. I'm guessing you two have the same deal going on. Well, have fun...
SexualStrat 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SexualStrat Strat, Strat, my buddy Strat. What is your obsession wih androgyny anyway? Why do you dwell on the subject of heshes? Are you having some gender confusion issues Strat? The only one you've ever embarassed is yourself Strat...make no mistake about that.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sirius212ify "The fetish lover can't have people hating his ladies." ... "I think your fetish is getting the better of you" ... "do you even read what I write, or are you so caught up in yourself that you're just arguing against you?" ... "Obviously you won't accept being wrong even now, but I can't help but wonder why you continue trying to prove yourself to me. I know I'm right, so what purpose are you trying to fullfil now?"<-- THIS! All rings true.
"SlyBoxer" has destroyed you. HTH & RIP.
SexualStrat 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Apparently your as ignorant of history as you are of logic. The ectomorph body type being the ideal look is relatively new. Twiggy and the British fashion industry created in in 1967, and the buff look already began to challenge it by the 1980s. The "ideal" look comes and goes. 20 years from now IBBF Fitness and Figure Competitors could be the ideal look. Btw, the skinnier look is already on its way out. Take a look at the muscles on Katie Couric, Brooke Shields, etc.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Apparently the concept of actions speaking louder than words is beyond your intellectual grasp. TheDezmona knew exactly what he was going to see. These videos are grouped by topic. If he wanted to look at Kate Moss he would've never navigated to these muscle women videos. Some guys who like buff women are afraid to admit it. This grouping of video ain't the place for guys who like the runway models. TheDezmona would've never made it here in the first place.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Dude, I was wondering when you were going to employ psychobabble to support your case. And that's all the "YouTube effect" is - lame psychobabble.I watch videos because I know what I like and I watch what I like - period. Btw, I'll get back to your numerous (and dubious) points later. You certainly have a lot of free time on your hands don't you, lol! Moreover, if I'm such a loser then you're curiously bent competing with a loser...think about it :-)
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Dude, you're funny. I mean major funny. Much of my enterprise in the world outside of YouTube (the real one) is conflict with people who really are smart, not guys who hide behind their computers and brag about how smart they are. These are people who are the real opinion makers, not just little Walter Mittys who couldn't hang in there with a smart college freshman. I'm currently dealing with peeps who really have notches on their proverbial guns, not faceless keyboard fantasizers
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer "I've already invited you to come chat, but you do so at your own risk." And you're not very civil w/people who insult you to boot. Not only are you a wannabe, but a hypocrite as well. You've insulted me during this whole thread and I just laughed it off. Did I touch a nerve? Do you want to set the rules and then not play by them?
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Sure you stand behind your words - with threats of violence. That's the only way wannabes like you can ever win - is to threaten your opposition with violence. That's how your kind operates because on a even playing field you can never prevail.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer You're just a wannabe, despite all your huffing and puffing. Your kung fu sucks so bad I doubt if you could even get a letter to the editor published. Powerless against you? You're nothing ace. Just another joker who comes up with a rather pathetic handle like SlyBoxer and has to rely on threats of violence because you have no substantive intellect. I've seen your type before. You want to be opinion makers but the only thing you can make to convince people of anything is a fist.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I'm glad you've identified yourself as a Net troll. Net trolls are wannabes. They get their ass kicked in debates in the real world so they come here to prove themselves against what they perceive to be other trolls. I made my bones in the real world so like I said, this is just entertainment to me. It's fun to watch pathetic megalomanics like yourself live in your cyber fantasy world. Keep on dreaming. You're just another thug who thinks he's clever.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Fight with the God? You're an intellectual pygmy with a thug ethos. Am I fuming? No, actually I kind of pity you. All this self-deification would make you a laughingstock in the real world. All you do is brag about an intellect which, frankly, I've seen exceded by drunks in bars. And I'm talking about guys who were totally shitfaced too, not just after a few nips. You don't know anything about setting traps. You merely claim to set them.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I'm indeed fighting with a God I am? Well, the arrogance of a mere mortal like myself jousting with a god! Silly me, I know not my place! Oh the silliness of mere mortals such as myself! We do not know who are superiors are, so we go blaspheming against such great deities as yourself! Oh great God, can you find pity toward such an inferior mortal as myself?
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I'm not a troll. I don't make a hobby out of going on the Net and living in fantasy world where I set myself up as some cyber god because I can't cut it in the real world. In the real world I'm a published author ace, so I'm no wannabe. I put myself out there. I'm able to write more than just a silly blurb on YouTube. Sure, once in a while someone writes something dumb and I nail him to the wall. I don't really take pride in it because it's not my primary m.o.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer As for being off topic, *you* were the one who directed this discourse to your greatness. I merely obliged you. Btw, my earlier question stands. How can you be laughing at me yet fuming with rage over my insults. How can you be mad and laughing at the same time? Are you some kind of a schizo? Are you alternately going Grrrr...hahaha...Grrrr...hahaha...I believe lithium is prescribed for that sort of thing you know.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I'm glad you take pride in being a Net troll though. Because that's all you'll ever be. Some guy who uses a lame moniker like "SlyBoxer" and expends all his creativity in 500 character YouTube blurbs. Take a good look at this page Mr. God. This is where you're going to stay. This is the limit of your abilities. Here's your kingdom oh mighty deity, I hope you're comfortable with it, because it's as far as you'll ever go.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer You avoided my question. Why do you say I make you laugh yet if I met you in person I'd be at risk of being decked? I like people who make me laugh, I certainly would never want to pulverize them. Do you like to hurt people who make you laugh? Are you a sadist? Or, as I suggested before, are you a schizo? Maybe you should look into some lithium for that. Do you alternately laugh and fume with rage? Lithium works wonders for that I hear...
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer You avoided it completely because you can't explain why you'd want to beat someone who makes you laugh without exposing yourself as a psycho (which I believe you are). As to the question are you going to cry some more, if you really knew anything about logic you'd know that question is a complex question fallacy (look it up).
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Of course you'll be here forever. You've got no where else to go. This is the limit of your ability: 500 character blurbs and your little cyber god troll trip. You'll never go beyond this little cyber fantasy realm so of course you're going to be here forever. Like I said, I don't generally look for conflict here, but occasionally it comes my way either by my choice or someone like yourself who, claims to deity aside, have a compulsion to compete w/those they think of as losers...
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I never pushed my "fetish" on others, and I don't see how taste in women is necessarily a fetish. Be that as it may, every screed I responded too was someone who visited a buff woman vid. I didn't go to a Kate Moss video and tell somebody "Hey, you should like buff women!" No, I just take issue w/guys who like the same women as me but don't have the stones to admit it. It shouldn't be a hard concept to grasp, but in your case...
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer You have a talent for missing the point (let's keep a good thing going)! I don't care if they hate these women or not. My beef isn't with people who don't like buff women. My beef is with guys who like them but they want to stay in the closet. I will point out that notion "muscles are only for men" squashes itself because it's part of the human body and therefore a self-contradictory statement is rendered. Other than that, people don't go out of their way to look at the unattractive.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Some life you got there, dude. Destroying know-it-alls on YouTube. Wow, you are some kind of a god I guess - in your own mind. I don't generally look for conflict because I never log on to this with the conscious intent of starting an argument. Yes, exposing closet buff women lovers is something I do but it's not all I do; it's not even half of what I do. You see only what you want to see, not the whole picture. That's something I learned about you at the beginning of this dialogue.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I suppose the difference between a fetish and taste is a metaphysical question. I prefer brunettes to blondes, so I guess that qualifies as a black hair fetish. Nonetheless, you're attempt to stereotype me as someone who jacks off to vids like this is just another example of your narrow thinking. I never jacked off to this video once. Btw, your crusade against know-it-alls on YouTube has taken the form of wanting to be the biggest know-it-all of them all - yes, a cyber God. Ironic?!?
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Btw, if you think this silly crusade of yours is stopping me from nailing hypocrites like TheDezmona I can reassure you that I'm just going to keep a good thing going...
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I'll be back shortly to deal with the bug after battling some dragons. In the mean time try to grow some real claws and teeth, and breathe some real fire instead of blowing smoke.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Want a better comeback? Well here's one: I'll bet you always find better insults in bathroom stalls at the sketchy side of town - especially at all male adult theaters...lol!!! You walked right into that one dude:-)
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Your creative insults need work. The statement "only you would know" is self-incriminating.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Your statement that I'd come chat w/you at my own risk tells me something about you. Since you already said I won't be any different in person than on this page, your invitation to meet me in person has an agenda of violence behind it. Since I'd be meeting you at my own risk, I can only conclude that your intentions are hostile - which is outside the scope of a legit debate. My so-called "tough guy" attitude only extends intellectual exchange - nothing else.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer You know numbnuts, I have to rethink my earlier position about you being a maggot who hides behind his computer. I may have been sorely mistaken, since you told me I'd meet you in person at my own risk. You may be a psycho. You tell me all I'm going to accomplish is inviting you to endless comedy, yet I'm also going to be at risk of violence because I insulted you. Are you laughing, or gritting your teeth in rage? Or are you doing both alternately...grrr...lol...grrr...lol...
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer No you haven't upset me at all. You're sort of like a sideshow act to me now, or more like a mental patient. Your doubletalk is still intact I see. You claim to laughing at me yet I've insulted you to the point of violence. Well, are you angry or are you laughing? Or are you one of those schizos who laugh uncontrollably one moment and then grit your teeth in anger the next? Are you in need of a rubber room?!?
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Everything "supports" your argument because you define your position as truth. Your whole argument style is one of pure circularity which, btw, is the oldest debater's tactic in the proverbial book. That's how I know you know nothing about the real world of debating. Ever true debater knows that trick and if we were to meet in front of a class of graduate philosophy students (my forum) you'd be exposed as the total intellectual fraud that you are.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer As to your question why am I still here? You amuse me as always...your megalomania is, shall we say, an amusing contrast to your ineptitude...:-)
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer All you've done is copy me from the start. I called you master because you're frankly, as I said, an episode of Seinfeld to me. I was the one who declared you to be an amusement first, by comparing you to SyFy Originals and Seinfeld. That's a matter of record on this thread, and it also proves you've been aping me this whole time. Hey Cheetah, have another banana...
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer You're just another Net pseudointellectual who hides behind silly monikers like "Slyboxer" and have no clue about the structure of logic (case in point: my whole argument against TheDezmona was inductive, not deductive). You're "kung fu" wouldn't cut it in a high school debate. You remind me of another clueless soul "godofcriticism." You're right about one thing though: I'll never live this down because I'll never know why I couldn't find better amusement than some cyber-wannabe.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer Hmmmm...I'm an arrogant YouTuber, I think I know everything, i think everyone is inferior,...?!? I hate to say this, but I suggest you don't take too close of a look in the mirror. I merely think before I say something, that hardly makes me superior to anyone else. If any arrogance (albeit mindless) has been shown here, it's demonstrated by your laughable claims of victory and my mental scars you left me with. What am I whining about btw? This is recreation to me.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer Once again you're aping me Cheetah (have a banana). I was the one who first said you're an amusement to me and that's a matter of record on this thread. As to your claim of being superior to everyone else, you're another one of those pathetic little cyber intellectual wannabes who hide behind anonymity and pretend to be smart. I've been out there in the real world, dude - where people know my name, see my face, and hear my voice. Like I said, your kung fu sux.
sirius212ify 6 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 6 months ago
@SlyBoxer I admire your passion for debate but I really must insist that you learn the actual rules of logic instead of making your own rules up as you go along. While this now seems like a Seinfeld episode, I can see where I might start feeling like an intellectual bully soon. Then again, since I'm an asshole, a fucking prick, a loser, etc. I suppose I'd be in character assuming that role...
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer These aren't my rules of logic, I didn't invent them. They were developed back in the Greco-Roman world - long before my time dude. Why do you think they originally have Latin names? Why do you think the personal attack is called ad hominem which is Latin for "against the man?" Why do you think the question begging fallacy is known in Latin as "petitio principii?" I didn't invent these rules, I just play by them. I suggest you learn them - Net obscurity won't save you in a live debate.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer Remember, I was the one who told you that you're an amusement to me first. That's a matter of record on this thread. You're just trying to mimic me, you're just aping me like a chimpanzee. In nature the prey mimics the predator. Learn something about the real rules of logic, not the ones you make up as you go along.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer Now you're resorting to some pretty lame psychobabble because I said you were an amusement to me - first. That's a matter of record on this thread. You're just trying to mimic me and nothing more. You're now shifting your ground - big time. Now you're trying to save your derriere by claiming you were indirectly thinking of amusing yourself at my expense. I wasn't indirectly thinking anything - I directly said you're amusing me and that's a matter of record.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer You're trying to slide the way I slide, jump the way I jump, jab the way I jab. It's monkey see monkey do all the way here Cheetah. You're just aping me now and trust me, I've been in enough debates to know what's happening when one arguer starts mimicing the other - the mimic has run out of ideas. Keep telling yourself you're the master...now go have a banana.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer You have no traps. To set a trap you have to be able to think more than one move ahead, and not just be a mimic. You haven't demonstrated any ability to think ahead at all. All you do is regurgitate what I say and then claim you were the first to say it, but this thread's record speaks for itself. Btw, I never said everyone thinks along the same lines as I do. You're just mimicing me because you can't think along any lines, period.
sirius212ify 7 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 7 months ago
@SlyBoxer I never claimed explicitly or even remotely implied I knew what TheDezmona was or is feeling. You on the other hand violated your own standard of proof by claiming that you know I'm mentally scarred. Again you avoid my question: how do you know what I'm feeling whereas I'm incapable of knowing what TheDezmona is feeling? Do you have some supernatural ability that I don't?!? You keep conveniently avoiding this question; I'd think an intellect as supreme as yours could answer it...
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer The concept of an empirical approach to knowledge seems to escape you. You're quoting me proves nothing, since I'm using an empirical, inductive approach to conclude that TheDezmona really likied what he saw. Like i said, actions speak louder than words. I wasn't telling him "what he should like," I was using his action as the sign post. I never told anyone what they "should like" because that would be irrational. We don't choose our taste in anything, we become aware of it.
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer I was the one who first said you were an amusement to me, and I compared you to a SyFy Original. That's a matter of record on this thread. Any third party can page back and see that. Yet because I didn't use the term "endless humour" your basing your argument on a mere phantom semantic difference. Actually on reflection my comparison of you to SyFy Originals was a bit unfair to that network. The scripts aren't that bad!!!
sirius212ify 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer I'm providing you with "endless humour?" Wow, imitation is the most sincere form of flattery. I was the one who said you were an amusement to me, and that's a matter of record on this thread. It would seem that your "much more in depth view' of my thoughts has led you to mimicry of some of my approaches. Remember my friend, it's the prey that mimics the predator in nature. Btw, I never used any big words here, or at least none that a trained logician doesn't know about...
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
SlyBoxer 8 months ago
@SlyBoxer Yes, you initiated this conversation, yet *I* was the one who told you that I find you amusing. Like I said, you're trying to rewrite the history of this thread. You're a source of entertainment to me, nothing more. Like I said, in nature the prey mimics the predator, not the other way around. You know nothing of logic, you just reason in a circle, knockdown strawmen, and make personal attacks. Frankly you're not that good. I seen smarter high school kids than you.
sirius212ify 8 months ago
Comment removed
sirius212ify 8 months ago