@pompousprick Futhermore, you should actually try to take your fingers out of your ears and slowly (because I know how painful it is) slide your head out of ass, dump your below-mental retardation idea that everything was designed just made for you (like the universe is some kind of Burger King motto) , and actually think about it.
This .000000000000000000000000000027% is not enough????? i still fucking have not seen..........................000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000099%yet
YOU FOOL DID YOU FIND ANY HUMANS ANY PLACE ELSE ? WE HAVE DISCOVERED SO FAR NEARLY 12 BILLION YEARS OF OUR UNIVERSE DID YOU SEE ANY TRACES OF LIFE ? NONE. SO WHY ARE WE SOOOO LUCKY TO BE ON THIS LITTLE BLUE SMUDGE!!! YOU UTTERLY DON'T MAKE SENSE :) ) YOU YOURSELF SHOULD "THINK ABOUT IT"
@BestThought Hmm, guess you don't have a career any place important: an education--let alone an attention span--like yours wouldn't land you anywhere close to something that would hint scientific/mathematical knowledge.
Life is lucky, by any conclusion. I'm proud to be alive. Creationists--especially Christians and Muslims--are afraid to live.
i feel like the examples of how inhospitable majority of the universe makes the little space that we have to live more rare and more unique heightening the chances of us even being able to live thus making it that much more of a 'coincidence' if thats what you believe. If life was abundant all over the universe then we wouldn't seem so special and so lucky to be the one spot where life can be sustained and the universe would seem less fine tuned for us. does that make any sense?
This video does an amazing job of the pointing out the problems with the argument from design. Although the argument from design is fallacious to start with because it is an argument from ignorance but this video is great nonetheless.
Why would God need to fine tune X to create conditions for Y to exist? Is he not powerful enough to just create Y without the restrains of condition setting? If he is not, then he can't be an all powerful God.
The argument FOR fine tuning is that this fine tuning allows for the existence of conscious beings to thrive. There is nothing in the Argument saying that this allows for a perfect utopian world without its pitfalls.
You misrepresent or misunderstand the premise of the argument.
@FeignofCordor Same difference, and every version I've heard uses examples of food and water being plentiful, etc. C.S. Lewis is famous for this flawed reasoning.
@FeignofCordor Yes quite obviously i might add, you hit the nail on the head. He's taking the premise and misrepresenting it, if not on purpose. Sidestepping the premise with the utopian argument, through the avenue of emotion.
@Hewhobearschrist He might've missed a form of the argument that the universe is fine-tuned to allow physical properties that can lead to life, but he has answered that as well, if not in great detail. Many a creationist claim that if a constant is changed so much as a hair's width in either direction, life couldn't form. Well, they removed the weak nuclear force entirely, and stars could still form. Stars fabricate all of the heavier elements in the universe.
@Cainkane1 We cannot terraform the moon because it's mass is too small, so it cannot keep it's atmosphere. Terraforming Mars is more realistic. The moons of Jupiter and Saturn are outside the habital zone of the sun...
@Miss6Nintendo what if we nuke mars creating some sort of a greenhouse effect melting down the ice ... releasing the trapped carbon dioxide , then planting plant to convert the carbon dioxide to oxygen ??? ( i know this idea was taken from someone else, but it's a coll idea )
The universe is finely tuned to permit life on our planet. Over 120 fine tune constants are know up to know, and as more time pasts, more are discovered. This might be due to chance, to physical need, or to design. Chance is a very bad explanation. Some advocate a Multiverse. But to have just one life permitting universe, you need 1 to 10^500 attempts to get it done. Thats a 1 with 500 zeros.
I'm an atheist. If the constants of physics were modified even slightly, the conditions for life to form would be removed. Like stars burning too quickly or stars and planets not forming at all. You contradict yourself. It is fined tuned for life, but it doesn't prove that there is a creator. It could be that life is an integral part of the universe (consciousness is a property of matter). Check out "anthropic principle". Multiple universes is an untestable crackpot theory just like religion.
DONT READ THIS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW U STARTED READING THIS SO DUNT STOP. THIS IS SO SCARY. PUT THIS ON AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR LOVERS NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORK
@IcarusTouma It actually is not surprising to me, the crust of the Earth is a tiny proportion of the overall volume of the Earth, then consider the oceans, uninhabitable regions such as the Sahara, extreme heights and the poles, I would expec the percentage to be even lower.
At the 1955 Nobel Prize winners meeting Stanley said "The hour is near when life will be placed in the hands of the chemist who will be able to synthesize, split and change living substance at will"
We take notice of such a statement.....We do not stop to consider that an attack with technological means is being prepared upon the life and nature of man compared with which the explosion of the hydrogen bomb means little...an uncanny change in the world moves upon us.
I would like you to answer some questions for me, if you don't mind:
1. Based on our scientific understanding of singularities and logic itself , Do you accept that the big bang singularity could not of caused itself to expand?
The lions tigers bears and sharks would rather just avoid you. only 3-4 percent of bateria are pathogenic, and out of all those bad things that you named off, there is a high probablility that you will die an old man in a warm bed. this video is fallacious. out of all the bad things out there here we are watching video's comfortably in our houses, this universe is fine tuned.
Try this; put a bunch of christians on the next Moon mission then push them out of the door without spacesuits. Then estimate the degree of fine tuning involved.
As a Christian, I find this video very interesting and DOES raise a good point. But there is no way something out of nothing could create the human brain. It is so complex that we will never understand it all. You cannot create emotions.
@Grandweener As a matter of fact the big bang does not even suggest that something came from nothing. It is creationists that have tried to spin it that way. All that science can tell us is what happened at the moment of the bang and after. What came before, we honest have no clue and there is no way known at present to even try to tell.
Afterward, we have fairly mapped out all the way down to how the brain developed. Still lots to fill in, but people are dedicating their lives to finding out.
@Grandweener We understand a great deal about the brain, including how it evolved. And it did not come from "nothing. Emotions are by-products of electorical and chemical activity within the brain. A lot of what you see as mysterious is actually well understood and has been for quite a while. Do some research on it. It is really is a fascinating area.
I think this video is great in showing the habitation situation. I do not think it disproves anything, nor do I think that "intelligent design" is a good argument for God nor do I think there is any sense in proving in positive scientific terms the existence of God. It is the same as proving in scientific terms that beauty exists.
@robertvroom One day there won't be a distinction between science and religion. (When we find the "god-particle" or "god-equation") Another thing to keep in mind when you hear "earth like" planet is that cosmologist are boxed in when they think that life can only be carbon-based, oxygen-breathing, water-drinking life as we know it. But there might be lifeforms out there we can't even conceive yet!
GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA ans read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist atr welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
Oh brother, this guy thinks he's got a good argument to refute intelligent design? What he's actually done is argue in favor of intelligent design. The earth is amazingly finely tuned, which no other place in the universe is, to sustain life. God didn't intend us to live on the the sun. It is so laughable all the thumbs up that the atheists give this sophomoric argument. This idiot uses the infinite number of universes argument as if this is reasonable.The only ones he can fool are the atheists
@YHWHisSovereign Also take in mind the point I made that its based on a Biblical false premise. Atheist will give thumbs up to a guy vomiting on camera if they think it leads away from God.
@cdk007 This video is completely dependent on ignorance. Everything you claim can be disproved very easily since your arguments are based on the false assumption that the universe and world today are the way God made them. In case you've never read the Bible, the book says in the second page that the creation will deteriorate and therefore cease to be the way God made it. That alone makes your entire video a waste of time. Better luck next time since you'll need it.
@jouc12 The bible says lots of interesting things. Most of it can be categorised as fanciful superstitious nonsense. Some parts are contradictory and some, just plain horrible. The bible can't be used as evidence for anything other than that the people who wrote it were constrained by superstition, local politics and a lack of knowledge of anything outside the middle east.
@uknowispeaksense Wrong, I didn't make any scientific claims with the Bible and I didn't ask you to. What you needed to disprove was my statement that the Bible says the world today is not the world God made. Whether you think the book is true or not doesn't matter, you can't base arguments on something a book does not say. For atheist people that claim to be smart, its amazing how often I have to explain basics to them.
@jouc12 Well ok, if u say that that's what it says then that's what it says. Your premise however is that because the bible says something then everything in the video is a waste of time. Your words. So by inference u are saying that all the scientific evidence in the video is false because of the bible. U can try & twist words as much as u like but your basic premise is the same. So is my assessment. The bible cannot be relied upon for anything other than scaring children into believing crap.
@uknowispeaksense You're not getting the point. I didn't say that the scientific statements are incorrect or that the Bible says they are. In his criticism he's making the assumption that God is the creator and that he created things exactly the way they are today. What I said was that the original creation according to what the Bible says is not the same as today. Therefore his criticism is based on a false premise making the argument and video useless.
@jouc12 Oh I see now, so when god created the earth it was an eden and has deteriorated since then to the point that most of it is uninhabitable today and because the bible says that it has changed then the premise in the video is incorrect. I get it. Well, I suppose when you can't fight logic and reason you have to resort to nitpicking. U are still relying on the bible to explain things. Whether this video is right or wrong is irrelevant in that regard because the bible is still a fairy tale.
@uknowispeaksense Is not nitpicking when the point is right on. And you are in no position to be talking about fairy tales. There's no greater fairy tale ever told than evolution. You actually believe that mutations produce useful intelligent design, when in reality they do the complete opposite. That's what empirical (in other words real science) not wishful thinking (evolution) demonstrates. So even the basics of your fantasy are upside down and yet you believe it.
@jouc12 I certainly don't believe that mutations cause intelligent design. Three errors in one short sentence. A new record! 1. The only intelligent design is humans making things (like religion). 2. Mutations more often than not produce deleterious effects however, occasionally they produce an advantage. 3. Belief is not a word I use to describe my knowledge base. It has been acquired through logic and reason. I like to leave belief to theists because without evidence, that is all you have.
@uknowispeaksense Actually the people that need belief the most are atheists. You are the ones that believe in numerous scientific impossibilities. Theists don't believe in any.
"I certainly don't believe that mutations cause intelligent design" Thanks for the self contradiction. Can you say that a spiders web is not intelligently designed? Or the correct attachment of muscles in the bones which have to be in the precise locations in order for a creature to move?
@uknowispeaksense Design requires intelligence doesn't it? The arguments atheists like Dawkins make is that things appear to be designed but are not. This of course is an admission of intelligent designed without actually admitting it. Unwilling sincerity is a phenomena many atheist suffer from. Its caused by people using facts to defend a lie.
@OmfgItsHenu I'm not responsible for how many or how long ago a video was posted. If posting is going to be determined by those conditions then no one would post videos on youtube without looking at dates or how many videos have been posted. And that would be absurd.
Because the people you are trying to reach do not actually know how to think. All they are capable of performing memory and correlation tricks, just as our ancient ancestors were once only capable of doing.
It's genuinely a shame that humans today often do not get instructed in how to think, when they are young. For the ability to THINK is not an inbuilt human trait, but actually a result of education and learning: knowledge passed down from past!
I love all your other videos, they are great. This one is not about a logical argument. Its on the silly side. I mean that is like saying your pillow is not a perfect place to put your head because there are 10 trilion other places that are terrible places to put your head. The earth is a garden of eden, not biblically but just because things are just right for us. Not by design but just because compare to everything out there. It works.
Many universes? Well don't you think an intelligent species evolved zillions of years before us in a different universe and one of them created our universe with the laws of physics and evolution we somewhat understand?
If there was a God don't you think he'd come down and say "What's up?" I mean, what do they get out of just sitting around watching us evolve for billions of years? That would be soooo boring..
I like this video, I like your arguments, and you make a good point. But then the question becomes, why has so many people on this Earth put their faith in God.
I don't know if I should be thinking I'm always right or also consider the opinions/beliefs/hypothesis of other people as right.
Personally, I think it's ignorant to always think of yourself as right, even after carefully considering all the facts.
What I mean is, why do creationists still think they're right considering the facts?
cdk007 (perhaps unknowingly) actually just made a solid case in the first part of this video that the emergence of life is of great mystery. And the second part of the video makes the case that God must be true. Why? Because if there are an infinite number of universes, anything that is not conceptually impossible, such as an omnipotent creator, must be true an infinite number of times and therefore, vis-a-vis its omnipotense, be true in our universe too.
This video reminds me of a line from a song "I beg your pardon, I never promised you a rose garden". I don't know anyone who argues that earth is an Eden.
Present day religion Is the furthermost thing then what it initially was meant to be. The true practice of conscious beings attempting to attain spiritual growth and awareness is no longer the function of organized religion in present day.
But do remember without the initial start and growth of religious practice or the instinctive desire of consciousness to become more aware of its origins, purpose and future,,, Science could not truly be what it functions as today.
who ever told you that every star in every galaxy has an earth-like planet? scientists seem to rejoice everytime they discover such a planet. of course there are plenty of other issues in this video as well as the arguement against creation in general, i'm just sick and tired of repeating the same words to those who won't even hear or reason. the proof is all around you. everything is the result of a cause, except God who is not bound by such natural limits.
Intelligent doesn't have to mean that every inch of the planet be perfect for us but rather that we have more than enough and more than enough that we need and all praise is to God alone.
But what if all that matters is that the .0000000000000000000000000000000000073% is the significant window/niche that was fine tuned for us and the rest is just waste product of/for our creation? All I know is that as long as I am alive the universe revolves around me. Of all the uninhabitable places to the habital places I am the hub/the center of it all. I am the center point in a large sphere called the universe!!
Why did evolution care to create life from non-life? and don't give me a your giving an abstract thingy human or person like characteristic cop out. did you see wargames at all. christfags 1 athiestfags 0
its how you look at things.... in a universe that has no shortage of ways to kill us.. we exist.. if that ain't a miracle.. "god making the impossible possible" then holy shit I don't know what is...
its how you look at things.... in a universe that has now shortage of ways to kill us.. we exist.. if that ain't a miracle.. "god making the impossible possible" then holy shit I don't know what is...
@knowpassword That's not the argument that's being made. The video is saying that the universe is not finely tuned for life, which it has proven. A universe that has no shortage of ways to kill us is not a universe that is finally tuned for life.
lol i seen stuff like if the earth moved 1 mile back or forth we will die ....O_O bitch doesn't know the rotation of the earth is elliptical ....we move hundreds of miles each year
The Bible tells us in Isaiah 45:18 that the earth was created to be inhabited. No where does that verse say that every square inch of the planet is meant to be hospitable for man. Animals and microscopic life can adapt better in certain environments than humans can. We also know that the "heavens" declare the glory of God, so their being suitable for life may not be the primary purpose for their existence.
@theabiotictheory Why should anyone care what the Bible says? Isaiah also said that Egypt would speak the Canaanite language. He obviously got that wrong.
"We also know that the "heavens" declare the glory of God," No, we don't. If we did, most, if not all, cosmologists and astronomers would believe in your god. Yet, religious polls of cosmologists and astronomers show that Christians are in the minority in those fields of study.
@lhvinny "Isaiah also said that Egypt would speak the Canaanite language." Isaiah's prophecies primarily deal with the end times and the millennium. So that particular prophecy will be fulfilled in the future.
@theabiotictheory No, it won't. The Canaanite language is extinct, meaning no one living knows it and it is not recorded anywhere in order for it to be learned. It's even worse off than a dead language like Latin. It is an impossibility for Egypt to speak that language, since that language no longer exists in any form, either oral or written.
@lhvinny "The Canaanite language is extinct" The language of Canaan was Hebrew. The spoken version of the Hebrew language basically died during the 4th century, surviving only in literature. It was revived in the 1880's so it is not unprecedented for a long dead language to have a rebirth.
@theabiotictheory I agree that Hebrew is a Canaanite language from a historical point of view. However, you are forgetting biblical context. It is quite clear, in multiple books in the Bible, that the Hebrews are mentioned as distinct from the people of the Land of Canaan. In the Biblical context, Hebrew is not the language they are referring to. They are referring to the language of the later conquered and destroyed peoples whose language is, most definitely, extinct.
@theabiotictheory I am well aware that, according to current historical research, that the Hebrews were not as different from the other Canaanites as the Bible makes them out to be. However, it is also mentioned in the literature that one should not think the Biblical Canaanites and historical Canaanites refer to the same group of people. References: "The Early History of God" by Mark Smith and "Canaanites" by Johnathan Tubb.
I think the fine-tuned argument is crap too but I think you missed the point of this argument. The idea is that if certain parts of physics were just a little bit different then life would not be possible.
LRon Hubbard once said, want to be rich? Become a politician or start a Church, & he did, Church of Scientology! 89% of Americans R Christian, spending yrs in church, 4% R able to quote a single verse from the Bible. They hum along to hundreds of songs recorded by artist, but Never Read or Study the word of God. They depend on TV preachers, cults etc to get them to Heaven, when actually the majority R no more than scam artist, singing a different tune leading them to slaughter.
jesus is our savour.... we are in the last days and he already said people in last days will get completely blind and ignore all the power of god .......
how easy now you can call the force of god spirit just a blind nature....
@ernestosharp :yeah,how easy, but it can't get any easier than just say God did it to anything around us and never bother to find out what it is
But who am I trying to talk to?...Never mind, I'm gonna go an enjoy my last days with as much blind science knowledge as possible, good luck with your saviour (there is an "i" btw) ;)
@GreenDevilAngel - The surface of the earth is <0.5% of the total volume of the earth. ((100/((4/3)piR^3))*4(pi)R^2), where R= radius of the earth, that equation will give you the % the surface of the earth is in comparison to the whole earth, which is 0.047%, then take into account that only ~30% of that surface is land, and only ~50% of that is easily habitable, you get only 0.007% of the earth is useful for human life. So, I think his estimate is exceedingly generous.
@ixamraxi Yeah! I realliced later that it mean the volume. But do you realy think it make sence to count about the volume?
Does we sell a house in volumes? Or buy land in volumes?
Even for mole it give no sence. after some m. there is hard stone.
And if we think at the skyscrapers, we can live on more than only the surface. Well, perhpas we can live once in the water. There exist already a hotel or something like that.
My suggestion, the counting about volume givs no sence. Update 2.0
@GreenDevilAngel - In makes sense because, people can [and do] live in caves, some of which are deep in the earth, but they cannot live in caves that exceed a certain depth, as it becomes inhospitable for human life [too hot].
When you buy land, you do not usually own anything subsurface, mineral rights costs extra.
"Fine Tuning" is like saying the sun exists and gives off light to make our eyes more useful, as apposed to our eyes evolving to make use of light that already existed.. Silly.
@GreenDevilAngel - Huh? I was saying the concept of the sun being made for the sake of the eye is silly, because it is silly. How is that angry or out of control? How is that offensive? I was addressing the topic of the video, the last sentence was not really directed at you.
On the other hand, Volume makes more sense, because IF we could live inside the earth, we would, but we cant, so we dont. I think his 0.47% takes that into account, as it includes a little above and below the surface.
No, it is not. We are in a fallen universe where all things die in their own time frame. It is this way because of the only animal that calls nudity indecent, and does bad knowing they are doing bad to whoever. Jesus who is God in whoever will not be that way.
If I'm a popular rich kid in highschool and i throw a party but my mom tells me: 'you have to invite non-popular kids too', and I invite all the girls from the Glee Club, Does it mean the party was created for the fat chick?? If my mom had not tell me this NOBODY from the glee club would be at my party, but since they are, does it mean the party is for the fat chick?? that's how ridiculous the fine tuning argument is. Life is not THE ONLY thing that becomes impossible by changing the constants.
We could have a universe (WCHAU) that permits chemistry, elements and stars, but since galaxies dont form, the rest doesnt. WCHAU that permits galaxies, elements and chemistry but since stars dont form, elements and chemistry dont. WCHAU that permits galaxies, stars and chemistry, but since elements dont form chemistry doesnt. We could not have a universe that permits galaxies, stars, elements and life, but since chemistry doesnt happen life doenst, cause there are no constants FOR life.
The constants are not tuned 'for life'. Some are tuned for GALAXIES, some for STARS, some for ELEMENTS, and some for CHEMISTRY. THAT'S IT!! changes make life impossible because life is subsidiary to these phenomena. And as you see, some constants target specific phenomena that others dont. Yes, stars depend on galaxies, elements on stars, and chemistry on elements, and life on chemistry, but we dont have constants that target life. so the universe is fined tuned for chemistry.
I think this is ridiculous,firstly no one can reproduce anything in the universe,first law thermodynamics.The facts are right there you or anyone else can not do better than God.No other known places can be habitable,the complexity of fine tuning seems to be dumbed down to get your point across.No one knows how to explain light gravity or many other laws,hence mostly ideas not fact.
@clawedification "The facts are right there you or anyone else can not do better than God." Which god and how do you know that it exists?
"No other known places can be habitable" And yet we've found 5 earth-sized planets in the habitable zone of others stars. Thus, they can be habitable. You are wrong.
"No one knows how to explain light gravity or many other laws" On the contrary, Einstein's Theories of Special and General relativity explain light and gravity quite well.
@pwnUgood If we humans could make this world a better place that would be awesome. But if you just watch the news you know that the world we live in is depressing. Personally, I don't believe I have a heavenly calling, but I do believe that God made the world for the majority of humans to live on it.
@ivanlagrossemoule thanks for the opinion. We're all entitled to our own. But like he said, creationist believe in nonsense because they believe in a creator who made a universe fined tuned for life. So that's where I got the idea he doesn't believe in a creator, or, rather, God. And I didn't say he has nothing to live for I said he has nothing to hope for. But if you don't believe in a creator what exactly are you living for? I rather take sides with God. The point is... without God there wou
@theycallmeRhandy It's silly to say that without believing in god you have nothing to hope for. You can hope for a good life and to better the world for having lived, and to leave descendants who can carry on, contribute to human progress, and that the human race could become more enlightened and less superstitious and closed minded. To think you need to go to "heaven" personally is selfish, childish and short-sighted. A person's life only has meaning because it ends.
The maker of this video must be really sad deep inside because he doesn't have anything to hope for but his lame life in trying to prove there is no God.
@theycallmeRhandy What makes you think he has nothing to live for? How do you think people did it before religion?
He's not trying to prove there is no god, he's just disproving stupid arguments. There is no evidence for god and belief is wishful thinking. Just look at how you think you're better than others because of your beliefs. That's what religion does, it's a lie to make you feel better.
Do you really look foward to being someones asswipe for eternity?
@jesse8857 You poor close minded nerd. Firstly I don't believe in evolution either, but I do believe in god. Secondly, it is extremely arrogant to say that we are alone in a HUGE universe. Thirdly the Bible makes some really good points, but other than that it is a collection of old jewish myths. Needless to say, don't believe everything they taught you at the orphanage.
For sure the universe has an intelligence to it. If we are but patterns of organized energy and atoms, then what sculpted us? Why is the universe shaped like it is? What caused the Big Bang to erupt? This, scientifically speaking is God.
Michael Denton's book "Evolution a theory in crisis" a non Christian molecular biologist talking straight about the issues with evolutionary theory. No one talks about the problems with the theory but there are many, many. I am not a creationists but do not like dogma from scientists either. Evolution is sciences canon and cannot be touched or your burned at the stake.
The only rebuttal that holds any weight is the multiple amount of universes. The rest should have been skipped, as they were irrelevant to the argument.
However, if we look at the theory of multiple universe, physicist say themselves that it is not backed by facts, but a mere speculation (which I have no problem with, as long as people don't promote it as a fact.)
@TheBeardedMan01 You are so correct. The author of this talks about creationists being arrogant and stupid as they do not "think about it" as he does, but this guy is just like the creationist bible thumpers in that he makes a lot of irevelant statements that do not support his argument. Also no evidence of multiple universe's as of yet.
The Universe begins to look more like a great thought than a machine. Sir James Jeans British Physicisy
I agree with Prohecy217. cdk007 built a strawmans argument against fine tuning of the universe. He hardly adressed any of the claims of proponents of fine tuning. Rather, he merely goes on about saying, look at diseases, fire, and airless space. This is completely a ridiculous argument.
People who talk about the fine tuning, point to an astonishing figure of statistics on the importability of physics and the earth being finely tuned to allow life or a universe in the first place.
You say the Earth was not designed for life because of the fact that there are snakes, lions etc that would kill us. If you are arguing against Christianity with this, then we have an answer. Poison and human-eaters came as a result of the first sin, and natural disasters probably came as a
I really hope this dude wins a Nobel Prize someday.
Best channel on youtube.
phuturephunk 3 days ago
Understand the fine tuning argument before you go and put together such an ignorant video.
pompousprick 1 week ago
@pompousprick Futhermore, you should actually try to take your fingers out of your ears and slowly (because I know how painful it is) slide your head out of ass, dump your below-mental retardation idea that everything was designed just made for you (like the universe is some kind of Burger King motto) , and actually think about it.
TheOkami1113 1 day ago
lol this idiot can't explain why our universe is so perfect so he comes up with this retarded parallel universe argument. fucking atheists
EhsaunOwns 1 week ago
This .000000000000000000000000000027% is not enough????? i still fucking have not seen..........................000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000099%yet
iltamian 1 week ago
scientists no longer believe in the big bang.. now they have a new theory called the big bounce.. (google it )
Gods0n1 2 weeks ago
YOU FOOL DID YOU FIND ANY HUMANS ANY PLACE ELSE ? WE HAVE DISCOVERED SO FAR NEARLY 12 BILLION YEARS OF OUR UNIVERSE DID YOU SEE ANY TRACES OF LIFE ? NONE. SO WHY ARE WE SOOOO LUCKY TO BE ON THIS LITTLE BLUE SMUDGE!!! YOU UTTERLY DON'T MAKE SENSE :) ) YOU YOURSELF SHOULD "THINK ABOUT IT"
BestThought 2 weeks ago
@BestThought Your words aside, writing in all caps makes you look like a gigantic moron.
phuturephunk 2 weeks ago
@phuturephunk
well i felt relieved at least thats a positive side right ? lol
BestThought 2 weeks ago
@BestThought Hmm, guess you don't have a career any place important: an education--let alone an attention span--like yours wouldn't land you anywhere close to something that would hint scientific/mathematical knowledge.
Life is lucky, by any conclusion. I'm proud to be alive. Creationists--especially Christians and Muslims--are afraid to live.
TheOkami1113 1 day ago
i feel like the examples of how inhospitable majority of the universe makes the little space that we have to live more rare and more unique heightening the chances of us even being able to live thus making it that much more of a 'coincidence' if thats what you believe. If life was abundant all over the universe then we wouldn't seem so special and so lucky to be the one spot where life can be sustained and the universe would seem less fine tuned for us. does that make any sense?
goodbyebrov 2 weeks ago
You never know, it could have been designed, just not for humans. We have our place on Earth's surface.
AntiDash 3 weeks ago
This video does an amazing job of the pointing out the problems with the argument from design. Although the argument from design is fallacious to start with because it is an argument from ignorance but this video is great nonetheless.
ry8an25oliver93 3 weeks ago
/watch?v=xoMgnJDXd3k ^-^
jmarmario1 1 month ago
4:00 eminem reference?
mascote483 1 month ago
Atheism is......................................................boring 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999.999999999999999999999999999999999999% boring¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
bambinoporco1 1 month ago
@bambinoporco1 but even if that statistic was possible, would atheism being boring it make it any less correct?
KaijinDV 1 month ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@bambinoporco1 sorry we don't make up myths to make atheism more interesting =/ besides, that doesn't mean it's any less true
Reiincarnation 1 month ago
You don't understand the argument. You've compose a very nice bit of rhetoric and reason against a straw man.
nothingmemorable 1 month ago
Even weinburg says yes it is fine tuned. oh stop lol
flexpape 2 months ago
Why would God need to fine tune X to create conditions for Y to exist? Is he not powerful enough to just create Y without the restrains of condition setting? If he is not, then he can't be an all powerful God.
theBartone9119 2 months ago
The argument FOR fine tuning is that this fine tuning allows for the existence of conscious beings to thrive. There is nothing in the Argument saying that this allows for a perfect utopian world without its pitfalls.
You misrepresent or misunderstand the premise of the argument.
FeignofCordor 2 months ago
@FeignofCordor Same difference, and every version I've heard uses examples of food and water being plentiful, etc. C.S. Lewis is famous for this flawed reasoning.
vargonian 2 months ago
@FeignofCordor Yes quite obviously i might add, you hit the nail on the head. He's taking the premise and misrepresenting it, if not on purpose. Sidestepping the premise with the utopian argument, through the avenue of emotion.
Hewhobearschrist 2 months ago
@Hewhobearschrist He might've missed a form of the argument that the universe is fine-tuned to allow physical properties that can lead to life, but he has answered that as well, if not in great detail. Many a creationist claim that if a constant is changed so much as a hair's width in either direction, life couldn't form. Well, they removed the weak nuclear force entirely, and stars could still form. Stars fabricate all of the heavier elements in the universe.
kurayamisidekick 1 month ago
3: 59
Nein , nein!
DANKE!
saurabhCherished 2 months ago
3:55 LOL ;)
tube14973 2 months ago
Humans may be able to terraform Mars and the moon and we may be able to live on some of the moons of Jupiter and saturn.
Cainkane1 2 months ago
@Cainkane1 We cannot terraform the moon because it's mass is too small, so it cannot keep it's atmosphere. Terraforming Mars is more realistic. The moons of Jupiter and Saturn are outside the habital zone of the sun...
Miss6Nintendo 2 months ago
@Miss6Nintendo what if we nuke mars creating some sort of a greenhouse effect melting down the ice ... releasing the trapped carbon dioxide , then planting plant to convert the carbon dioxide to oxygen ??? ( i know this idea was taken from someone else, but it's a coll idea )
IvanderHaisley 2 months ago
@tnafguy You ignored the point made in this video.
AtheismIsCorrect 2 months ago
The universe is finely tuned to permit life on our planet. Over 120 fine tune constants are know up to know, and as more time pasts, more are discovered. This might be due to chance, to physical need, or to design. Chance is a very bad explanation. Some advocate a Multiverse. But to have just one life permitting universe, you need 1 to 10^500 attempts to get it done. Thats a 1 with 500 zeros.
AudioVoice8888 2 months ago
@AudioVoice8888 If you chose to believe in a creator, what is your explanation for as why the creator happened to be intelligent and everything?
P.S. I'm not trying to argue against a creator, I'm just wondering...
anticorncob6 2 months ago
because there had to be a decision to cause the universe, the cause therefore is intelligent.
AudioVoice8888 2 months ago
i knew that only a small part of earth and the universe were ''life friendly'' that that it was this bad.... LOLOL i didn't know yet.
YoshiTheGreenOne 2 months ago
I'm an atheist. If the constants of physics were modified even slightly, the conditions for life to form would be removed. Like stars burning too quickly or stars and planets not forming at all. You contradict yourself. It is fined tuned for life, but it doesn't prove that there is a creator. It could be that life is an integral part of the universe (consciousness is a property of matter). Check out "anthropic principle". Multiple universes is an untestable crackpot theory just like religion.
Indrius 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DONT READ THIS CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS. YOU WILL GET KISSED ON THE NEAREST POSSIBLE FRIDAY BY THE LOVE OF YOUR LIFE. TOMORROW WILL BE THE BEST DAY OF YOUR LIFE. HOWEVER IF YOU DO NOT POST THIS COMMENT TO AT LEAST 3 VIDEOS YOU WILL DIE WITHIN 2 DAYS. NOW U STARTED READING THIS SO DUNT STOP. THIS IS SO SCARY. PUT THIS ON AT LEAST 5 VIDEOS IN 143 MINUTES WHEN UR DONE PRESS F6 AND UR LOVERS NAME WILL APPEAR ON THE SCREEN IN BIG LETTERS. THIS IS SO SCARY CAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORK
Ichiro20 3 months ago
NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN
victoneter 3 months ago
@IcarusTouma It actually is not surprising to me, the crust of the Earth is a tiny proportion of the overall volume of the Earth, then consider the oceans, uninhabitable regions such as the Sahara, extreme heights and the poles, I would expec the percentage to be even lower.
pat5168 3 months ago
Extremely well argued.
Neueregel 3 months ago in playlist More videos from cdk007
what ho Horatio - presuppositions !! and
solar constant 1.366 kW/m²,[2]
fine structure constant 1/137.035999074(44).[1][2]
read. foundation of math - it is just a straw dog
sf20071 3 months ago
OK. Men have died over (or gone mad) over a simple supposition which in our very early state of ...whatever... I would not bet on
Mathematics is based on a very simple predicate ... a reoccurence of tghe aforementioned obsevation.. cheers
sf20071 3 months ago
When he's doing the 99.9999999...99927% He sounds like Hitler telling a crowd No, and getting stuck in an infinite loop.
MrY0ufail 3 months ago
At the 1955 Nobel Prize winners meeting Stanley said "The hour is near when life will be placed in the hands of the chemist who will be able to synthesize, split and change living substance at will"
We take notice of such a statement.....We do not stop to consider that an attack with technological means is being prepared upon the life and nature of man compared with which the explosion of the hydrogen bomb means little...an uncanny change in the world moves upon us.
Martin Heidegger
sf20071 3 months ago
I would like you to answer some questions for me, if you don't mind:
1. Based on our scientific understanding of singularities and logic itself , Do you accept that the big bang singularity could not of caused itself to expand?
BreakoutLuceal 3 months ago
The lions tigers bears and sharks would rather just avoid you. only 3-4 percent of bateria are pathogenic, and out of all those bad things that you named off, there is a high probablility that you will die an old man in a warm bed. this video is fallacious. out of all the bad things out there here we are watching video's comfortably in our houses, this universe is fine tuned.
RespectMyHate 3 months ago
Try this; put a bunch of christians on the next Moon mission then push them out of the door without spacesuits. Then estimate the degree of fine tuning involved.
lewisner 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm wondering where did you get that 0.46% of Earth is capable of sustaining human life? thanks.
IcarusTouma 4 months ago
As a Christian, I find this video very interesting and DOES raise a good point. But there is no way something out of nothing could create the human brain. It is so complex that we will never understand it all. You cannot create emotions.
Grandweener 4 months ago
@Grandweener As a matter of fact the big bang does not even suggest that something came from nothing. It is creationists that have tried to spin it that way. All that science can tell us is what happened at the moment of the bang and after. What came before, we honest have no clue and there is no way known at present to even try to tell.
Afterward, we have fairly mapped out all the way down to how the brain developed. Still lots to fill in, but people are dedicating their lives to finding out.
TheAnubisDrake 4 months ago
@Grandweener We understand a great deal about the brain, including how it evolved. And it did not come from "nothing. Emotions are by-products of electorical and chemical activity within the brain. A lot of what you see as mysterious is actually well understood and has been for quite a while. Do some research on it. It is really is a fascinating area.
fileboy2002 3 months ago
Nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein nein! NOOO
treasuredroperX 4 months ago
I think this video is great in showing the habitation situation. I do not think it disproves anything, nor do I think that "intelligent design" is a good argument for God nor do I think there is any sense in proving in positive scientific terms the existence of God. It is the same as proving in scientific terms that beauty exists.
LouigiVerona 4 months ago
Planet Earth:
Finely tuned to make life barely possible.
Mortality Rate, 100%
MrZardoz777 4 months ago
@robertvroom One day there won't be a distinction between science and religion. (When we find the "god-particle" or "god-equation") Another thing to keep in mind when you hear "earth like" planet is that cosmologist are boxed in when they think that life can only be carbon-based, oxygen-breathing, water-drinking life as we know it. But there might be lifeforms out there we can't even conceive yet!
liftedview 4 months ago
999 999 999 99999, LMAO.
NANOFORGE 4 months ago
999 999 999
ParaSpite 4 months ago in playlist More videos from cdk007
to the contrast, we living being fine-tuned(evolved) ourselves to suit the universe.
jojoinhere 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GOD particle exist within Human body which is CERN Laboratory of Nature.for details see YOU TUBE VK SONAKIA ans read article on all voices.com -certainty-tool-is-higgin-boson-or-god-particle-which-exist-in-human-body.We have already developed next generation easy to learn unified science.world scientist atr welcome to see and test FIT-Future Imaging Tool technology
vk sonakia
unified field scientist
bhopal
INDIA
vksonakia@yahoo.co.in
vksonakia 4 months ago
The "fine tuned" argument is one of the stupidest arguments I've ever heard. Even a moment of casual thought reveals it to be utter crap.
mikefromwa 4 months ago
Oh brother, this guy thinks he's got a good argument to refute intelligent design? What he's actually done is argue in favor of intelligent design. The earth is amazingly finely tuned, which no other place in the universe is, to sustain life. God didn't intend us to live on the the sun. It is so laughable all the thumbs up that the atheists give this sophomoric argument. This idiot uses the infinite number of universes argument as if this is reasonable.The only ones he can fool are the atheists
YHWHisSovereign 5 months ago
@YHWHisSovereign Also take in mind the point I made that its based on a Biblical false premise. Atheist will give thumbs up to a guy vomiting on camera if they think it leads away from God.
jouc12 5 months ago
@cdk007 This video is completely dependent on ignorance. Everything you claim can be disproved very easily since your arguments are based on the false assumption that the universe and world today are the way God made them. In case you've never read the Bible, the book says in the second page that the creation will deteriorate and therefore cease to be the way God made it. That alone makes your entire video a waste of time. Better luck next time since you'll need it.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 The bible says lots of interesting things. Most of it can be categorised as fanciful superstitious nonsense. Some parts are contradictory and some, just plain horrible. The bible can't be used as evidence for anything other than that the people who wrote it were constrained by superstition, local politics and a lack of knowledge of anything outside the middle east.
uknowispeaksense 5 months ago
@uknowispeaksense You forgot to mention anything that disproves my comment.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 Dude, you're using the bible as evidence of something scientific. I don't need to disprove anything you've said.
uknowispeaksense 5 months ago
@uknowispeaksense Wrong, I didn't make any scientific claims with the Bible and I didn't ask you to. What you needed to disprove was my statement that the Bible says the world today is not the world God made. Whether you think the book is true or not doesn't matter, you can't base arguments on something a book does not say. For atheist people that claim to be smart, its amazing how often I have to explain basics to them.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 Well ok, if u say that that's what it says then that's what it says. Your premise however is that because the bible says something then everything in the video is a waste of time. Your words. So by inference u are saying that all the scientific evidence in the video is false because of the bible. U can try & twist words as much as u like but your basic premise is the same. So is my assessment. The bible cannot be relied upon for anything other than scaring children into believing crap.
uknowispeaksense 5 months ago
Comment removed
jouc12 5 months ago
@uknowispeaksense You're not getting the point. I didn't say that the scientific statements are incorrect or that the Bible says they are. In his criticism he's making the assumption that God is the creator and that he created things exactly the way they are today. What I said was that the original creation according to what the Bible says is not the same as today. Therefore his criticism is based on a false premise making the argument and video useless.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 Oh I see now, so when god created the earth it was an eden and has deteriorated since then to the point that most of it is uninhabitable today and because the bible says that it has changed then the premise in the video is incorrect. I get it. Well, I suppose when you can't fight logic and reason you have to resort to nitpicking. U are still relying on the bible to explain things. Whether this video is right or wrong is irrelevant in that regard because the bible is still a fairy tale.
uknowispeaksense 5 months ago
@uknowispeaksense Is not nitpicking when the point is right on. And you are in no position to be talking about fairy tales. There's no greater fairy tale ever told than evolution. You actually believe that mutations produce useful intelligent design, when in reality they do the complete opposite. That's what empirical (in other words real science) not wishful thinking (evolution) demonstrates. So even the basics of your fantasy are upside down and yet you believe it.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 I certainly don't believe that mutations cause intelligent design. Three errors in one short sentence. A new record! 1. The only intelligent design is humans making things (like religion). 2. Mutations more often than not produce deleterious effects however, occasionally they produce an advantage. 3. Belief is not a word I use to describe my knowledge base. It has been acquired through logic and reason. I like to leave belief to theists because without evidence, that is all you have.
uknowispeaksense 5 months ago
@uknowispeaksense Actually the people that need belief the most are atheists. You are the ones that believe in numerous scientific impossibilities. Theists don't believe in any.
"I certainly don't believe that mutations cause intelligent design" Thanks for the self contradiction. Can you say that a spiders web is not intelligently designed? Or the correct attachment of muscles in the bones which have to be in the precise locations in order for a creature to move?
jouc12 5 months ago
@uknowispeaksense Design requires intelligence doesn't it? The arguments atheists like Dawkins make is that things appear to be designed but are not. This of course is an admission of intelligent designed without actually admitting it. Unwilling sincerity is a phenomena many atheist suffer from. Its caused by people using facts to defend a lie.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 I'm sorry buddy, but I am getting a sore forehead from all the facepalms. Good luck to you.
uknowispeaksense 5 months ago
@uknowispeaksense Yeah, too bad you can't defend your position.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 note to self:
dont humiliate yourself by trying to reply to almost 2 year old video.
OmfgItsHenu 5 months ago
@OmfgItsHenu Note to you:
dont humiliate yourself by claiming that there's something wrong with replying to a video because of the time of posting, its irrelevant.
jouc12 5 months ago
@jouc12 oh, you are right.
im sure he just randomly searches through all of his videos he ever made, just looking at the comments.
no matter how many years ago he posted them.
no matter how many thousand comment each one has.
but hey, good luck
OmfgItsHenu 5 months ago
@OmfgItsHenu I'm not responsible for how many or how long ago a video was posted. If posting is going to be determined by those conditions then no one would post videos on youtube without looking at dates or how many videos have been posted. And that would be absurd.
jouc12 5 months ago
Comment removed
jouc12 5 months ago
"Think about it" isn't very good advice sorry.
Because the people you are trying to reach do not actually know how to think. All they are capable of performing memory and correlation tricks, just as our ancient ancestors were once only capable of doing.
It's genuinely a shame that humans today often do not get instructed in how to think, when they are young. For the ability to THINK is not an inbuilt human trait, but actually a result of education and learning: knowledge passed down from past!
M0b1u5 5 months ago
I love all your other videos, they are great. This one is not about a logical argument. Its on the silly side. I mean that is like saying your pillow is not a perfect place to put your head because there are 10 trilion other places that are terrible places to put your head. The earth is a garden of eden, not biblically but just because things are just right for us. Not by design but just because compare to everything out there. It works.
gmanzeroalpha 5 months ago
Many universes? Well don't you think an intelligent species evolved zillions of years before us in a different universe and one of them created our universe with the laws of physics and evolution we somewhat understand?
125689cc 5 months ago
could you post the references to the peer reviewed articles
94jmcorrea 5 months ago
could have just said "no" with "try to see how many things survive in space that are living"
DeathnoteBB 5 months ago
this guy is a cunt.
sandmire1 5 months ago
@sandmire1
Why?
odinata 5 months ago
@Servant4Hm even jewish theologians deny the validity of genesis. Adam and Eve were myth. Myth = no fall
kelbykross1 5 months ago
If there was a God don't you think he'd come down and say "What's up?" I mean, what do they get out of just sitting around watching us evolve for billions of years? That would be soooo boring..
Ostnizdasht206 5 months ago
@Servant4Hm I could of written something in a book and years late someone reads it and presumes it's the truth too.
InferiorThanYou 5 months ago
the universe isn't designed for life, we are designed for the universe. God. Is. Imaginary.
DanielDaniel1 6 months ago
I like this video, I like your arguments, and you make a good point. But then the question becomes, why has so many people on this Earth put their faith in God.
I don't know if I should be thinking I'm always right or also consider the opinions/beliefs/hypothesis of other people as right.
Personally, I think it's ignorant to always think of yourself as right, even after carefully considering all the facts.
What I mean is, why do creationists still think they're right considering the facts?
eah2119 6 months ago
The 99.9999999999999999927 part reminded me of Hitler's "NEIN NEIN NEIN" part in the Inglorious Basterds.
jlmdfnbo 6 months ago
cdk007 (perhaps unknowingly) actually just made a solid case in the first part of this video that the emergence of life is of great mystery. And the second part of the video makes the case that God must be true. Why? Because if there are an infinite number of universes, anything that is not conceptually impossible, such as an omnipotent creator, must be true an infinite number of times and therefore, vis-a-vis its omnipotense, be true in our universe too.
sebastianbbc 6 months ago
Comment removed
sebastianbbc 6 months ago
A Creatorless creation is for the birds. The lengths men will go to avoid accountability and insert their own agenda is amazing!
Virtue0sity 6 months ago
Never been bitten by a mushroom before...
beerathon 6 months ago
Shut up Jesus trolls.
ChooksLoverCC 6 months ago
nein, nein, nein, nein, nein, nein, nein, nein etc......why so German and disagreeable?
yoogeo1 6 months ago
@yoogeo1 Clarification for German speaking people: its "neun, neun, neun, neun, neun, neun, neun... etc." ;)
Peace.
visavillem 6 months ago
This video reminds me of a line from a song "I beg your pardon, I never promised you a rose garden". I don't know anyone who argues that earth is an Eden.
MsColdCanada 6 months ago
We've had 2 world wars ==> Erth is fine tuned for war!
guillatra 6 months ago
Present day religion Is the furthermost thing then what it initially was meant to be. The true practice of conscious beings attempting to attain spiritual growth and awareness is no longer the function of organized religion in present day.
But do remember without the initial start and growth of religious practice or the instinctive desire of consciousness to become more aware of its origins, purpose and future,,, Science could not truly be what it functions as today.
TikiKid 6 months ago
who ever told you that every star in every galaxy has an earth-like planet? scientists seem to rejoice everytime they discover such a planet. of course there are plenty of other issues in this video as well as the arguement against creation in general, i'm just sick and tired of repeating the same words to those who won't even hear or reason. the proof is all around you. everything is the result of a cause, except God who is not bound by such natural limits.
soulja4daHOLYOne 6 months ago
@paranoidboytoy 1.Evolution cant "care" that is a human characteristic 2. Creation of life and how it evolved are two different things
pochopaz7381 6 months ago
Intelligent doesn't have to mean that every inch of the planet be perfect for us but rather that we have more than enough and more than enough that we need and all praise is to God alone.
rosepetalaysha 6 months ago
@rosepetalaysha Especially since we don't have more than enough space. We are rapidly using it all up.
Travaillons 6 months ago
@Travaillons one of the "functions" of the universe is to "end" at one point maybe that's y...
rosepetalaysha 6 months ago
there are none so blind as those who will not see
stratrat1914 6 months ago
so who are those doesnt want us to tune in to universe and stay as slaves of our senses is it universe capitalizm
artregeous 7 months ago
But what if all that matters is that the .0000000000000000000000000000000000073% is the significant window/niche that was fine tuned for us and the rest is just waste product of/for our creation? All I know is that as long as I am alive the universe revolves around me. Of all the uninhabitable places to the habital places I am the hub/the center of it all. I am the center point in a large sphere called the universe!!
u2ooberboober 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why did evolution care to create life from non-life? and don't give me a your giving an abstract thingy human or person like characteristic cop out. did you see wargames at all. christfags 1 athiestfags 0
paranoidboytoy 7 months ago
its how you look at things.... in a universe that has no shortage of ways to kill us.. we exist.. if that ain't a miracle.. "god making the impossible possible" then holy shit I don't know what is...
knowpassword 7 months ago
oh, hell yes, we are lucky as hell. Um, still don't see where god comes into it
vaughndrix 7 months ago
@vaughndrix thats your perspective my friend.. I can
knowpassword 7 months ago
its how you look at things.... in a universe that has now shortage of ways to kill us.. we exist.. if that ain't a miracle.. "god making the impossible possible" then holy shit I don't know what is...
knowpassword 7 months ago
@knowpassword That's not the argument that's being made. The video is saying that the universe is not finely tuned for life, which it has proven. A universe that has no shortage of ways to kill us is not a universe that is finally tuned for life.
RootDubz93 7 months ago
lol i seen stuff like if the earth moved 1 mile back or forth we will die ....O_O bitch doesn't know the rotation of the earth is elliptical ....we move hundreds of miles each year
crackthecorn 7 months ago
99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999
conciousness88 7 months ago
The Bible tells us in Isaiah 45:18 that the earth was created to be inhabited. No where does that verse say that every square inch of the planet is meant to be hospitable for man. Animals and microscopic life can adapt better in certain environments than humans can. We also know that the "heavens" declare the glory of God, so their being suitable for life may not be the primary purpose for their existence.
theabiotictheory 7 months ago
@theabiotictheory Why should anyone care what the Bible says? Isaiah also said that Egypt would speak the Canaanite language. He obviously got that wrong.
"We also know that the "heavens" declare the glory of God," No, we don't. If we did, most, if not all, cosmologists and astronomers would believe in your god. Yet, religious polls of cosmologists and astronomers show that Christians are in the minority in those fields of study.
lhvinny 7 months ago
@lhvinny "Isaiah also said that Egypt would speak the Canaanite language." Isaiah's prophecies primarily deal with the end times and the millennium. So that particular prophecy will be fulfilled in the future.
theabiotictheory 7 months ago
@theabiotictheory No, it won't. The Canaanite language is extinct, meaning no one living knows it and it is not recorded anywhere in order for it to be learned. It's even worse off than a dead language like Latin. It is an impossibility for Egypt to speak that language, since that language no longer exists in any form, either oral or written.
lhvinny 7 months ago
@lhvinny "The Canaanite language is extinct" The language of Canaan was Hebrew. The spoken version of the Hebrew language basically died during the 4th century, surviving only in literature. It was revived in the 1880's so it is not unprecedented for a long dead language to have a rebirth.
theabiotictheory 7 months ago
@theabiotictheory I agree that Hebrew is a Canaanite language from a historical point of view. However, you are forgetting biblical context. It is quite clear, in multiple books in the Bible, that the Hebrews are mentioned as distinct from the people of the Land of Canaan. In the Biblical context, Hebrew is not the language they are referring to. They are referring to the language of the later conquered and destroyed peoples whose language is, most definitely, extinct.
lhvinny 7 months ago
@theabiotictheory I am well aware that, according to current historical research, that the Hebrews were not as different from the other Canaanites as the Bible makes them out to be. However, it is also mentioned in the literature that one should not think the Biblical Canaanites and historical Canaanites refer to the same group of people. References: "The Early History of God" by Mark Smith and "Canaanites" by Johnathan Tubb.
lhvinny 7 months ago
I think the fine-tuned argument is crap too but I think you missed the point of this argument. The idea is that if certain parts of physics were just a little bit different then life would not be possible.
MetalliCxZero 7 months ago
3:40 This part of the video is flawed
comradecommedy 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LRon Hubbard once said, want to be rich? Become a politician or start a Church, & he did, Church of Scientology! 89% of Americans R Christian, spending yrs in church, 4% R able to quote a single verse from the Bible. They hum along to hundreds of songs recorded by artist, but Never Read or Study the word of God. They depend on TV preachers, cults etc to get them to Heaven, when actually the majority R no more than scam artist, singing a different tune leading them to slaughter.
onstageagain 8 months ago
This video is complete nonsense.
mexicandruglord 8 months ago
@mexicandruglord says the druglord...
n987 8 months ago
@n987 That right - I see you can read :)
mexicandruglord 8 months ago
@mexicandruglord says the beaner
Drgamedood 8 months ago
@Drgamedood beaner?
mexicandruglord 8 months ago
Love the 9 9 9 part LOL
uyenst 8 months ago
jesus is our savour.... we are in the last days and he already said people in last days will get completely blind and ignore all the power of god .......
how easy now you can call the force of god spirit just a blind nature....
ernestosharp 8 months ago
@ernestosharp :yeah,how easy, but it can't get any easier than just say God did it to anything around us and never bother to find out what it is
But who am I trying to talk to?...Never mind, I'm gonna go an enjoy my last days with as much blind science knowledge as possible, good luck with your saviour (there is an "i" btw) ;)
uyenst 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN NEIN
Kalphiter45 8 months ago
I guess whoever made this video knows better than people like Roger Penrose or Paul Davies...
AegeanKing 8 months ago
@AegeanKing Einstein n Planck said there is somehting more, something inexplicable.
But how in the name of sunlight, you get this bizzare calculation 2:10 ...
If you cant serious explain that very strange 2 numers..well, the other numers are probably right, the onw about the hole universe.
As i know, are 30 percent of the earth land. From this land are ..well, about ..more then 50 percent well habitable.
So, much more than 10 percent of the face of the earth is very easy for living.
Till now..
GreenDevilAngel 8 months ago
@GreenDevilAngel - The surface of the earth is <0.5% of the total volume of the earth. ((100/((4/3)piR^3))*4(pi)R^2), where R= radius of the earth, that equation will give you the % the surface of the earth is in comparison to the whole earth, which is 0.047%, then take into account that only ~30% of that surface is land, and only ~50% of that is easily habitable, you get only 0.007% of the earth is useful for human life. So, I think his estimate is exceedingly generous.
ixamraxi 8 months ago
@ixamraxi Yeah! I realliced later that it mean the volume. But do you realy think it make sence to count about the volume?
Does we sell a house in volumes? Or buy land in volumes?
Even for mole it give no sence. after some m. there is hard stone.
And if we think at the skyscrapers, we can live on more than only the surface. Well, perhpas we can live once in the water. There exist already a hotel or something like that.
My suggestion, the counting about volume givs no sence. Update 2.0
GreenDevilAngel 8 months ago
@GreenDevilAngel - In makes sense because, people can [and do] live in caves, some of which are deep in the earth, but they cannot live in caves that exceed a certain depth, as it becomes inhospitable for human life [too hot].
When you buy land, you do not usually own anything subsurface, mineral rights costs extra.
"Fine Tuning" is like saying the sun exists and gives off light to make our eyes more useful, as apposed to our eyes evolving to make use of light that already existed.. Silly.
ixamraxi 8 months ago
@ixamraxi Human Silly. silly. Thats not a word of argument. Its a word of anger n lost of self-controll.
Or do you want to offend?
The comparison about light does not fit with the question about volume or surface from the earth.
Ask other people what make more sence: volume or surface of the earth?
How many peopel do you know that want to bay land and the subsurface?
How many peopel do you know that live in a house with a 1 or also 2 floor?
H m skyscraper do you know
H m people live subsurface
GreenDevilAngel 8 months ago
@GreenDevilAngel *** bevore erase the word at the beginning: Human ***
GreenDevilAngel 8 months ago
@GreenDevilAngel - Huh? I was saying the concept of the sun being made for the sake of the eye is silly, because it is silly. How is that angry or out of control? How is that offensive? I was addressing the topic of the video, the last sentence was not really directed at you.
On the other hand, Volume makes more sense, because IF we could live inside the earth, we would, but we cant, so we dont. I think his 0.47% takes that into account, as it includes a little above and below the surface.
ixamraxi 8 months ago
No, it is not. We are in a fallen universe where all things die in their own time frame. It is this way because of the only animal that calls nudity indecent, and does bad knowing they are doing bad to whoever. Jesus who is God in whoever will not be that way.
kobidobidog 8 months ago
If I'm a popular rich kid in highschool and i throw a party but my mom tells me: 'you have to invite non-popular kids too', and I invite all the girls from the Glee Club, Does it mean the party was created for the fat chick?? If my mom had not tell me this NOBODY from the glee club would be at my party, but since they are, does it mean the party is for the fat chick?? that's how ridiculous the fine tuning argument is. Life is not THE ONLY thing that becomes impossible by changing the constants.
sirdelrio 8 months ago
We could have a universe (WCHAU) that permits chemistry, elements and stars, but since galaxies dont form, the rest doesnt. WCHAU that permits galaxies, elements and chemistry but since stars dont form, elements and chemistry dont. WCHAU that permits galaxies, stars and chemistry, but since elements dont form chemistry doesnt. We could not have a universe that permits galaxies, stars, elements and life, but since chemistry doesnt happen life doenst, cause there are no constants FOR life.
sirdelrio 8 months ago
The constants are not tuned 'for life'. Some are tuned for GALAXIES, some for STARS, some for ELEMENTS, and some for CHEMISTRY. THAT'S IT!! changes make life impossible because life is subsidiary to these phenomena. And as you see, some constants target specific phenomena that others dont. Yes, stars depend on galaxies, elements on stars, and chemistry on elements, and life on chemistry, but we dont have constants that target life. so the universe is fined tuned for chemistry.
sirdelrio 8 months ago
I think this is ridiculous,firstly no one can reproduce anything in the universe,first law thermodynamics.The facts are right there you or anyone else can not do better than God.No other known places can be habitable,the complexity of fine tuning seems to be dumbed down to get your point across.No one knows how to explain light gravity or many other laws,hence mostly ideas not fact.
clawedification 8 months ago
@clawedification "The facts are right there you or anyone else can not do better than God." Which god and how do you know that it exists?
"No other known places can be habitable" And yet we've found 5 earth-sized planets in the habitable zone of others stars. Thus, they can be habitable. You are wrong.
"No one knows how to explain light gravity or many other laws" On the contrary, Einstein's Theories of Special and General relativity explain light and gravity quite well.
lhvinny 8 months ago
@pwnUgood If we humans could make this world a better place that would be awesome. But if you just watch the news you know that the world we live in is depressing. Personally, I don't believe I have a heavenly calling, but I do believe that God made the world for the majority of humans to live on it.
theycallmeRhandy 8 months ago
8:04 the dinosaur has it's balls on it's chin xD
10dmcghee 8 months ago
@ivanlagrossemoule thanks for the opinion. We're all entitled to our own. But like he said, creationist believe in nonsense because they believe in a creator who made a universe fined tuned for life. So that's where I got the idea he doesn't believe in a creator, or, rather, God. And I didn't say he has nothing to live for I said he has nothing to hope for. But if you don't believe in a creator what exactly are you living for? I rather take sides with God. The point is... without God there wou
theycallmeRhandy 8 months ago
@theycallmeRhandy It's silly to say that without believing in god you have nothing to hope for. You can hope for a good life and to better the world for having lived, and to leave descendants who can carry on, contribute to human progress, and that the human race could become more enlightened and less superstitious and closed minded. To think you need to go to "heaven" personally is selfish, childish and short-sighted. A person's life only has meaning because it ends.
pwnUgood 8 months ago in playlist Science/Biology
its fruitfull enough if u go thru this video, good presentation with so many examples................
Raviwax 8 months ago
The maker of this video must be really sad deep inside because he doesn't have anything to hope for but his lame life in trying to prove there is no God.
theycallmeRhandy 8 months ago
@theycallmeRhandy What makes you think he has nothing to live for? How do you think people did it before religion?
He's not trying to prove there is no god, he's just disproving stupid arguments. There is no evidence for god and belief is wishful thinking. Just look at how you think you're better than others because of your beliefs. That's what religion does, it's a lie to make you feel better.
Do you really look foward to being someones asswipe for eternity?
ivanlagrossemoule 8 months ago
what a superb video, thanks!
waheex 8 months ago
neineineineineineineineineineineineineineineineineineineineinei...
Kaeralho 8 months ago
@jesse8857 You poor close minded nerd. Firstly I don't believe in evolution either, but I do believe in god. Secondly, it is extremely arrogant to say that we are alone in a HUGE universe. Thirdly the Bible makes some really good points, but other than that it is a collection of old jewish myths. Needless to say, don't believe everything they taught you at the orphanage.
chingchombuela 8 months ago
Just because humans can't survive there doesn't mean a creature a different body chemistry, metabolism, and level of endurance couldn't.
chingchombuela 8 months ago
For sure the universe has an intelligence to it. If we are but patterns of organized energy and atoms, then what sculpted us? Why is the universe shaped like it is? What caused the Big Bang to erupt? This, scientifically speaking is God.
chingchombuela 8 months ago
Michael Denton's book "Evolution a theory in crisis" a non Christian molecular biologist talking straight about the issues with evolutionary theory. No one talks about the problems with the theory but there are many, many. I am not a creationists but do not like dogma from scientists either. Evolution is sciences canon and cannot be touched or your burned at the stake.
amercury7 8 months ago
ninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenineninenine~
agsiar 8 months ago
The only rebuttal that holds any weight is the multiple amount of universes. The rest should have been skipped, as they were irrelevant to the argument.
However, if we look at the theory of multiple universe, physicist say themselves that it is not backed by facts, but a mere speculation (which I have no problem with, as long as people don't promote it as a fact.)
TheBeardedMan01 8 months ago
@TheBeardedMan01 You are so correct. The author of this talks about creationists being arrogant and stupid as they do not "think about it" as he does, but this guy is just like the creationist bible thumpers in that he makes a lot of irevelant statements that do not support his argument. Also no evidence of multiple universe's as of yet.
The Universe begins to look more like a great thought than a machine. Sir James Jeans British Physicisy
amercury7 8 months ago in playlist Evidence FOR Evolution and Against Creationism
I agree with Prohecy217. cdk007 built a strawmans argument against fine tuning of the universe. He hardly adressed any of the claims of proponents of fine tuning. Rather, he merely goes on about saying, look at diseases, fire, and airless space. This is completely a ridiculous argument.
People who talk about the fine tuning, point to an astonishing figure of statistics on the importability of physics and the earth being finely tuned to allow life or a universe in the first place.
TheBeardedMan01 8 months ago
There is enough strawmen in this video to burn new york city.
prophecy217 9 months ago
You say the Earth was not designed for life because of the fact that there are snakes, lions etc that would kill us. If you are arguing against Christianity with this, then we have an answer. Poison and human-eaters came as a result of the first sin, and natural disasters probably came as a