Amazing Recent Discoveries That Confirm Bible's Accuracy (4 of 6)

[castelgandalf]

2000 years from now archaologist will discover, excavate and study the ruins of new york city, thus proving ("confirming the accuracy of") the existence of...

spider man!

[Quran871]

bible is fake are you kidding me? it was real but paul screwed the bible up. FAKE. quran says it more accurate thats why im muslim.

[Brxpoisonv2]

After all, God is Love.

[BayStateChick]

This guy is actually a con artist. He is not a certified archaeologist, and is hated by many Christians as well.

[liellibg]

Moses is symbolic of old law. When he came to the jorden he was told to go up the MT top and would die He had completed his work. Jesus crossed the jorden symbolic of the new law. The added golden rule laws had to be placed into this Ark, because it is a covenate between God and man. No I don't think this is the ark. Yes the body is the new ark but God has more than one witness to back up his word. Jesus must have placed the new golden laws in the Ark were ever it is hidden in the wilderness.

[krissyeh]

Wow, they found some anchors, whoopy bloody doo.

[biomechanical1976]

YO

[mercifromYah]

Yes, Scottie: Ron is the true discoverer of the Red Sea Crossing, Mt. Sinai, & the ark of Noah. Bob tries to take credit for these himself. Bob claims the Red Sea Crossing is on a coral formation. Watch his claim of the site & imagine the Hebrews trying to lead their cattle & wagons over these sharp rocks & notice that these aren't wide enough for a million people to cross. I read Bob's book on Paul,s ship & it rings true though.

[ScottieWallace]

hmmmmm what about ron wyatts discovery??? c'mon man (the guy narrating this video) mountains of Arrarat, theres even anchor stones there... it looks like your trying to profit from vague evidence when its clearly been found.

[jipsom]

Let me get this straight. The Bible says the Ark is real and your 'proof' that the ark is real is that...the Bible says it is real? You sir, are a genius. I concede ;o)

I'm off to read Harry Potter, which I know is real because it's written down in a book.

[MarkII69]

@jipsom

No, the proof the Ark exists, is the Bible. You typical brainless heathen.

:-)

[krissyeh]

@MarkII69

The bible is full of the biggest fairy stories ever told.

You are the brainless one for you have been brainwashed by the cult of religion, which is as useless as a used tampon.

[MarkII69]

@krissyeh

Wrong guess retard.

And I was brainwashed, by God almighty.

Enjoy the proof you're soon going to get.

[krissyeh]

@MarkII69

Don't you mean "god the dick", a quote from Supernatural and I believe everything in that tv show for it is "REAL".

Listen sunshine, it has as much reality as your deluded retarded bible................. fucking none.

I like that show for it porns the crap out of the bible and you religious nutters.

[MarkII69]

@krissyeh

You and that show, are now judged, by the power of the Holy Ghost. These words are sanctified by God. A-men.

[krissyeh]

@MarkII69

Fuck your so-called god and you. You are also a bloody coward for have set your channel private.

Go shove your a-men where the sun don't shine.

[Brxpoisonv2]

Dude you don't have to do that, you know to try and bring people down. If God wasn't mercy full he would've smited you probably a long time ago, but God is Love, he sent his only begotten son to save us from our sins. I understand where your coming from, an athiest that is. Even tho you don't care ill still tell you that my dad is an athiest and he doesn't believe in God and Gods son Jesus christ as his saviour like i do, but i still love my dad and try to show him love like God has shown me.

[kevp951]

@MarkII69 I'm with you buddy ! i should have known @krissyeh was Islam as that is the reason for the comments. And you're right, the proof will be had soon, the signs are everywhere for true believers that have their eyes open. God Bless !!!!

[krissyeh]

@kevp951

Fuck your funny and so uneducated. I am an atheist you deluded idiot.

[kevp951]

@krissyeh looks to me that you are making yourself look like the idiot, so i won't have to bother calling you one...

[jesusfreakrw]

if you believe the bible you would know that none of what you found was 40000 years old the ways you try to find of the age of old things is flawed and if you want the truth look in your bible the earth is not even that old.

[Gracchi]

every temple in egypt had its own ark,infact every temple in ancient egypt was like a university in its own, holding the knowledge , moses being a priest from just 1 temple, took it with him, , the ignorance of the next gen not knowing any better, think this is the only ark there ever was.

also it has been proven with modern science that the ark could levitate,,

how about this, imagine they had 100s of these, =building the pyramids

btw didnt watch this crap , just saw ark at the start lol

[jipsom]

@Gracchi

That sounds amazing. Have you got any links or reference to this 'modern science' that proves the ark could levitate? I'd love to read it.

[Gracchi]

@jipsom History Channel Ancient Discoveries - Lost Science Of The Bible Part 3 Of 3

/watch?v=YwbHxIZSWYQ

enjoy

[Zaaxun]

oh my god !!! are there actually idiots who think the ark is in ethiopia. dont listen to this blasphemy. Gods most holy item would never leave his land or people israel. ron wyatt has already found all these things confirmed by the goverment of turkey and saudi arabia and israel!!!!!!!!! his claims have NO government backing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! think!!!!!!

[UppsalaDragby]

@Zaaxun I wouldn't know one way or the other, but where do you suppose the ark was before 1948 when the land of Israel, and the people of Israel, were separated?

[o0lBobl0o]

scholars overwhelmingly agree that the Gospel of Mark was the first gospel written. The likely year of its composition is 65 AD.

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o That is based on best guess's streching what little shred of evidence they can find which is just dates referenced in the bible. So lets see if jesus really exsisted then he died over 30 years before the first gospel was written. So the real author who remains in question, used 30+ year old hearsay to write it at best. So this person who wrote it (and its not mark) some how knows exactly what happened and what was said 30 years before..amazing.

[lizazoon]

@SoldierofYAH I bet you never studied evolution. More than 250.000 scientific papers, more than 250.000 scientists in the appropriate fields stand behind evolution.

Go ahead with you silly rear-guard skirmishes.

. -- .. you come from an Un-conscience animal right? lol..--

You come from an clump of mud right ? Lol Where does your sonscience come from ? From mud ?

[Imaginefree69]

"If you even had ONE clue of how hard this is" What are you finding hard? Throwing insults at anonymous strangers? Yeah, I can see how that might be tough. Of course, REAL born again people do not sin; I can see how THAT might be difficult, but then you prolly dismiss THAT part of your religion... I think it's so cute how children love to choose usernames like Rambo, Soldier, Avenger, etc. Those little fantasies fit in nicely with the fantasy of Jesus on a White Horse saving us from The Devil.

[lizazoon]

As our pastor said recently in hos homily, The bible is not a science book, nor a history book, but a book of faith.

[TFlemmJ]

@lizazoon Is your pastor one of the seminary-manufactured humanists being pumped out today? I know priests in the Catholic Church who don't even believe the Bible, and a Bishop in Holloway who's an athiest. Relying on a "pastor's" words doesn't mean much nowadays. Being a pastor doesn't mean you're an authority in theology and archeology.

[lizazoon]

@TFlemmJ A pastor has the same authority as Paul of Tarsus. He was just a preacher too.

[lespauls61]

@lizazoon was this before or after he molested you??

[lizazoon]

@lespauls61 After I molested him. Lol.

[lespauls61]

@lizazoon Faith definition= beliveing in things without EVIDENCE. That means there is ZERO proof of any claims of the bible.

[lizazoon]

@lespauls61 I wish every believer had your logic, instead of grasping desperately at every straw to prove  the bible.

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 no it doesn't mean that at all

are you sure you know what evidencr even means?

[lizazoon]

SoldierofYAH : What kind of Jihad are you fighting ?

[lizazoon]

SoldierofYAH-- oh wait that might support evolution. LOL!--

Exactly only the simple minded reject evolution

[TFlemmJ]

@lizazoon The simple minded don't reject evolution. The informed reject evolution.  Read "Forbidden Archeology". Do more research. Lose the pressupositions along the way.

[lespauls61]

@TFlemmJ No the simple minded blindly follow religion. If you actually research the origins of religion you'll find that they are all created by men who claim to have spoken to a creator. Amazingly no one else witnessed this. The bible is not historically accurate, none of the claims of jesus or his mracles have any eyewitness writings everything is hearsay from sources generations after the fact and we know how reliable hearsay is.

[lespauls61]

@TFlemmJ There way more evidence to support evolution than creationism. Because there is ZERO evidence for creationism.

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 life is evidence for creationhow do you think life got started in the first place without a creator?

[lizazoon]

What nonsense:get an education..

[lizazoon]

SoldierofYAH.: Make a contribution to mankind: stop your nonsense. Pick up a science book.

[lizazoon]

SoldierofYAH:  What rubbish.!!!

[o0lBobl0o]

the Bible has never been wrong about anything archeology has discovered

it is used more than any other ancient manuscript to locate cites in the cradle of life area

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o It might have the names of actual cities but none and I mena NONE of the claims of jesus have any sources outside the bible that can be considered refutable evidence

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 i think you mean irrefutable

there is nothing that is irrefutable there is more evidence that Jesus rose from the dead than there is that alaxander the great ever even lived

in the last few years because of the zealous searching of science to find refuting evidence the Bible account has been found to be accurate at every turn

The Bible was a finished book before John died

by around 100AD the entire Bible was completed as it stands today

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o Lets see what evidence you have...no eyewitness. Humm yes thats definitly proof. No one knows when the bible was finished. None of the gospels have dates. And the council of nicea in the 3rd century is who put together the current bible. You dont even know anything about your religion pathetic.

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 John the eyewitness

the Bible was finished around 100AD

the gospels have been dated for several years

the current Bible was put together long before 300AD

you don't know much about my religion

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o There are no eyewitness writings. ANd if you think there are you havent done any research. There were dozens of gospels around for the first 200-350 years. I believe the council of nicea made the closest thing to the new testament. they also gave dec 25 as the birthday of jesus because they needed a date that people would worship on that was already common which was the winter solstice. Do some damn research you self procalimed christians are so ignorant of the FACTS.

[o0lBobl0o]

thats what they used to think but in the last few years it has been found to be wrong

the Bible was completed by around 100AD how many times do i need to post this before you do a little research

all the crap your spitting up is stuff you got from some anti Christian website

the worst place to find out the truth

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o Sorry you are so wrong. No one knows for certain when the gospels were written. There were a couple dozen gospels at least. Some control freak decided to pick only four and make it into the bible. And ordered the destruction of the others. This way he could get more people under one roof to worship his ideology. DO SOME RESEARCH. I hate your type that think they know the history of christianity yet dont!

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 Act 5:40 And to him they agreed: and when they had called the apostles, and beaten them, they commanded that they should not speak in the name of Jesus, and let them go.

Act 5:41 And they departed from the presence of the council, rejoicing that they were counted worthy to suffer shame for his name.

Act 5:42 And daily in the temple, and in every house, they ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ.

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o Is this supposed to prove something? The bible isnt written by any eyewitness's. The apostles didnt write anything down this is all third party rumor and hearsay. How can third parties qoute people that they never saw?

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o The Church claims that "the resurrection is the fundamental argument for our Christian belief" (Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. xii, p. 792), yet no supernatural appearance of a resurrected Jesus Christ is recorded in any of the earliest Gospels of Mark available. So how did all this info get into the new ones hummm maybe someone added it so the story fits???

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 The same people that all agree that a few verses were added after the original also agree that mark 16: 5 through 8 were an eyewitness account written at that time

when the other verses were added is a point of great speculation

maybe the first were written as he waited frightened and alone he wrote the increadible things he saw and after completed the work adding in his account of what happened later

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o This is opinion and speculation which last i checked isnt evidence.

So jesus didnt die when he was around 33 he lived into his 60's according to you because you claim an eyewitness wrote some stuff (not documented anywhere) as it happened.

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 you just used it as evidence but suddenly it's not evidence

as i've said a lot more is known about Jesus than you would like to think

i claim an eyewitness wrote Mark by your own admission

i claim he wrote it as it happened the last few verses added after Jesus was ascended sometimes around 37 or 40

within 20 or 30 years of that time the text was held sacred and has a well known history from around 67 when it went viral

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o THis is not evidence it is wishful thinking. There is no historical evidence or archeological evidence to support this NONE. Show me the scientific historical evidence not hearsay by non eyewitness's.

[lespauls61]

@o0lBobl0o The resurrection verses in today's Gospels of Mark are universally acknowledged as forgeries and the Church agrees, saying "the conclusion of Mark is admittedly not genuine ... almost the entire section is a later compilation" (Encyclopaedia Biblica, vol. ii, p. 1880, vol. iii, pp. 1767, 1781; also, Catholic Encyclopedia, vol. iii, under the heading "The Evidence of its Spuriousness"; Catholic Encyclopedia, Farley ed., vol. iii, pp. 274-9 under heading "Canons").

[o0lBobl0o]

@lespauls61 Mar 16:5 And entering into the sepulchre, they saw a young man sitting on the right side, clothed in a long white garment; and they were affrighted.

Mar 16:6 And he saith unto them, Be not affrighted: Ye seek Jesus of Nazareth, which was crucified: he is risen; he is not here: behold the place where they laid him.

Mar 16:7 But go your way, tell his disciples and Peter that he goeth before you into Galilee: there shall ye see him, as he said unto you.

[IrrepressibleGuile]

@o0lBobl0o what you have to remember is ppl will redicule this because they fear that the bible maybe true, cos if it is, then that mean God is real and that means that people will have to account for their sins.  God is scrary so ppl will blow off proof of the bible because of fear, ofcourse ppl who do that will never admit it