In fact, all H2O power claims thus far have been hoaxes when looked at closely.
The only way to get power from water is to split it into H and O, and feed the H to a fuel cell (for electric cars) or to the carburetor/ fuel injector (in a regular car engine). In either case, it will take more energy to split the atom than would be gained.
@vubear i'm sorry but i think the idea first came from Daniel Dingle of the Philippines way back in 1968. google for the complete details and how it did not come to commercial production until now. btw, the reporter is also careful to point out that this is Japanese "revelation" rather than "invention" as written in the title. anyway, i hope the Japanese, who are much capable in mass-producing this idea, could make it so that we won't be agents in the further destruction of our planet.
The water powered concept has been working for more than fifty years. I have personally seen demonstrations. This site even had videos on this several years ago.
The reason this is not common knowledge is that the government has made it impossible for common people to purchase the supplies to build the hydrogen converter.
My brother and I even have the plans made by some of these inventors.
Here's the history of what happened to the inventors.
this technology has been around for awhile...the reason it keeps getting squashed is $.. when billionares stand to loose trillions you better believe it'll get stomped out..
we built an electric truck in 98 for 10k that could go 80+mph and got 250-300mi per charge.. (3hr charge@240v, 6hr@120v).. if you really want this type of tech, you gotta do it yourself or pay someone to do it for you.. or wait about a hundred yrs for the greed-masters to catch up with technology..
such technology will never be used by people, because of those greedy oil companies owners... they'll do anything to stop it from happen... and the corrupted politicians will help them do it.
@elmariachi109 your fucking stupid, the oil companies arent greedy, if theyre so greedy how about you ride a bike from now on. cant do it? then shut the fuck up. you buy their oil, so quit acting like they have you in a chokehold when you pay their salaries. nobody is stopping this from happening, its just not needed untill oil supplies are run dry. chances are this car is too expensive and not practicle enough, otherwise WHY THE FUCK WOULD ANYONE HAVE A GAS-RUN VEHICLE.
He's being realistic. If you think that Water-powered cars will be on the market in the near future, you've obviously never read up on our history. A positive attitude is great, but you're letting it blind you from the truth.
@watup2154 Let it be know that there was a guy in america who invented a water powered car like 20 years ago but he "MYSTERIOUSLY" died. The rich upper class government officials have billions invested in oil and their willing to "take care" of anybody or anything that stands to put a dent in their wallet.
@117Burn Yeah but too bad they weren't the first to make it. The first was a guy from america like 20 years ago who "mysteriously" died. The technology never reach mainstream because some wanted to keep their wallets full of oil profit money.
@117Burn Yeah but too bad they weren't the first to make it. The first was a guy from america like 20 years ago who "mysteriously" died. The technology never reach mainstream because some wanted to keep their wallets full of oil profit money.
Now, WHY THE HELL don't we have people that are smart enough to build things like that HERE in the US?! We're just getting started with electrical cars!! D:<
@samxlili because there is no companies willing to in dorse these ideas. i had presented an idea like this to ford ( to run an eletric current through water to produce hydrogen and oxygen) but they said they had no interest in my idea
@samxlili We actually HAVE had people who invented this in the US. But the oil companies know they will lose trillions so they had them killed. If you think I'm joking look up Paul Pantone. No companies will endorse this idea because they don't wanna disappear either. When you come up with an idea that will make someone lose billions of dollars, why would it be unreasonable to think that personwill have youkilled and made look like a suicide or accident? Because people dont kill each other? LOL
@samxlili It is because of the goverment! There was a man who invented a h2o engine a while ago in USA. The man mysteriously "died" not a long time ago, and no one knows why. If the world will allow the use of H2O engine, the goverment would be broke. That is why we will never have a water powered engines in production/
@EAsportz1 His name was Stan Mayer. He invented a hydrogen splitter that produced way more energy than it uses & with only a small modification all cars could run on water. His research was taken by nasa in the 80's & he was banned by the us government from working on it ever again. He was poisoned in I think the late 90's. Just look on this YT page, the secret is out & one day we will see these in production.
..."mass manufature their invention in the very near future." Yeah right already been three years and nothing, the inventors probably didnt get a patent due to unexplicable reasons or got filthy rich and dumped the project. Oil is a very very profitable source of money for a few already very rich and powerful people and they do whatever it takes to protect that source of extremely high income even if the alternatives wont polute or destroy the planet like oil based fuels do.
thumb up to japan,now just make it bigger and take over the auto market.sound so good it should be on ships going to car dealers,do they come in seudans and some in suv to take over the american market americans love big car!
do you think if you're stranded and without water avalible. can you pee in it and it would still work? urine is acidic and would it mess up the components in the car or no?
The energy generator removes the hydrogen from the water and uses the hydrogen for fuel, but what powers the energy generator? If you want a car that runs on water, try a boat.
@IVIpact they said it runs on 'any-type' of water... and sence there will always be the same amount of water on earth, we could just find a new market for 'cleaning' our dirty water/sea water to the point where it could be usable..
This was originally invented by Filipinos but the Philippine government did not support this invention that's why the inventors go to Japan to seek help for the development of the product and now we can see other countries benefiting to our inventions
if this extracts hydrogen that means it must release oxygen too, that means that this would not only power things in say a bunker, but provide oxygen too.
They must have found an easy way to split the water molecule into separate atoms. Probably a better battery in case of electrolysis. Then again maybe ...cold fusion! Hehehe.
41 people are smart. Any half baked 5th grader knows it takes more energy for the electrolysis process then you get from the fuel. This violates the Clausius Statement. The HHV or LHV for water is non existent, deal with it!
Is that the company that declared bankruptcy after the tsunami?
Or that was the MOCO car?
Anyway, there are cars running on nothing (energy from air and battery never recharged, like Tesla car) and they are "reminded" to keep it for themselves. No financial support, nothing.
If you have one of those and are "allowed" to go on the news (most news networks are owned by the same bad guys) is because you are part of them, or have a contract signed with blod to NEVER make it to the market.
@ingimarsi because this is a scam, and not possible without some kind of extra energy input for the electrolysis process, usually this external energy comes from a coal power-plant
@cyberlord64 It is. Splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen in the first place takes a great deal of energy, and obvious you can't get more energy back magically. I can't believe so many people took this seriously.
@Fwright88 refining yellow cake ore as gases in centrifuges takes a lot of energy also but magically it works, I can't believe anyone took Einstien seriously.
@huntncomfort I'm not sure what the Einstein comment has to do with anything. However, refining various ores via various processes to refine fissile materials works because you're expending mechanical energy during refining. But you get energy out via nuclear fission. They're unrelated processes. However, the reason it works is not "magical". The fissile material is highly unstable. And so if you impart enough starting energy, it will undergo a chain reaction which gives off a lot of energy.
@huntncomfort This relies on the instability of the the fissile material. During fission, the materials go from a high-energy unstable state to a low-energy relatively stable one. The mechanical energy spent in refining did not make the material unstable on an atomic level, it was unstable before we processed it. So, we spend some energy in processing, but get a lot more out in fission. However, water is incredibly stable to begin with. The fact that life exists in the way it does relies on that
Any time we generate energy, it's by allowing some material to move from a high energy state to a low energy one. Internal combustion engines work by burning the large relatively unstable organic molecules in gasoline (or petrol), diesel, and similar fuels in the presence of oxygen. The product is ideally a mixture of carbon dioxide and water plus traces, both of which are highly stable. This difference in stability occurs as energy is lost from the molecules and forms heat, which we use.
In the case of hydroelectric energy, we take water at a higher altitude, where it has more gravitational potential energy, and allow it to flow downward through turbines. In the process it loses gravitational potential energy. We harvest some of that energy, in the turning of the turbines. But again, the energy has lost energy in some sense. Here, as gravitational potential energy. In nuclear power, we take unstable heavy elements, which decay to less unstable lighter elements, giving off heat
In the previous three examples, chemical, mechanical, and atomic, we start with a high energy substance, it loses energy, and we harvest some of that energy. The thing about water, is that it is very stable. And stable substances do not make good fuel sources. In fact, they aren't fuel sources at all under most circumstances.
this is VERY strange. If the device takes out the hydrogen from water to produce energy, cant they then use that hydrogen to combine it again with atmospheric air to then produce water? This is allready done btw. Then you wouldn't need fuel at all. water to hydrogen to water. I don't know the details behind it's operation but it seems a lot like overunity.
Then came the tsunami.... I'm guessing "someone" didn't want it to be mass manufactured which would hurt oil companies' huge profits and infinite wealth for illuminatis. See submarine weapons and H.A.R.P.
WTF? They didnt invent it .they took credit from a filipino who invented that , why japan took credit ? ..hmm our fucked up government couldnt careless about these great ,excellent idea's ..so they let our inventor's sell up their invention.
I'm sure people have mentioned this before. This is basically a fuel cell car. In simple terms, the energy generated is by a process in which two different metals are sitting in a solution which generates a potential charge. This video can be misleading because it DOESN'T run on water! The water is the solution in which these two metal is submerged in. What I want to know is, what metals are they? Some metals provide a ton of energy in this process but are very rare and costly.
If they can make standard sized cars/trucks/vans/ etc that can run on this, we can say goodbye to companies like Exxon Mobil, BP, and Shell - companies that are absolutely annihilating our ecosystem.
@SevenFootPelican You would go through government bureaucratic, Lobbying, and Forginers to eliminate these horrible companies. Oh, also the New York stock exchange.
watch?v=9ubY25mClGQ&feature=related. This has been done decades ago by an engineer working in his own backyard...Sad how this bloke will never be recognized for this.
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Bullshit. First of all that car is a REVAi. An Indian electric car also known as G-Wiz... Secondly you can't extract hydrogen out of water, recombine hydrogen and oxygene to water and get a surplus of energy. It's called thermodynamic equilibrium and you can't fool it...
@KimWingz This has nothing to do with Darwin or religion. If you studied a little thermodynamics it would make perfect sense but obviously you have no idea.
@Alexunder3D Yes you can. You are not stating how much of each will come from original water. There's no surplus. It's you who is not taking in account the oxigen taken from AIR. So it's the hidrogen from the original water PLUS extra oxigen. The dis-information trick of "you can't make energy out of thin air" doesn't deny there is energy everywhere, wether you can scientifically understand it or not.
@applxperience If you're so certain then by all means explain yourself. Do you have an actual theory in mind that states such a function that would deliver kinetic energy using nothing but water? If you have such knowledge then I guess it's a happy day for humanity.
@Alexunder3D No, I don't have a theory to contradict thermodynamics or any other law, and I agree that there can't be surplus of energy by recomposing the SAME amount of water in the SAME state (energy charge in any form). I just want you to stop misleading people with the same sentence. We don't care if the car is not really running on ONLY water as claimed. We just care that it doesn't need to be refilled with paid fuels.
Energy can be obtained from anything, and the fact you don't know how doesn't mean it's not there. This car could be running on H + air + static on air + dif of temp between here and space, etc, as present cars run on fuel PLUS OXIGEN. Why don't you lower the performance of present cars to include OXIGEN consuption? and wait! they need gravity and costly room temperature unlike the hundreds of degrees below cero in space!
@applxperience Ok. First of all I am "misleading" people? Me? Did I present a fake water-running car? I suggest you did a background search on that car and find out why it was never produced. Secondly it is obvious (I presume) that energy is everywhere. After all most of what we see in the universe consists of energy (since matter is energy). The problem is harvesting that energy in sufficient and most importantly realistic ways.
For example you can get kinetic energy out of steam but in order to get that steam you need combustion so that you gan get some water into a rich in thermal energy, vapor state. Then you'll lose a huge percentage of that thermal energy as soon as you'll try to convert it into kinesis (through friction etc) but most importantly due to an inescapable increase of the system's entropy. Exergy decreases through conversions of any amount of energy.
In the example of the car above the amount of energy needed to convert H2O into HHO should be the exact same as the one delivered after reconversion of H and O into H2O. Of course this never happens due to the fact that this is the real world and the entropy of this system unavoidably increases through conversions (electrical to chemical, chemical to electrical, electrical to mechanical etc).
Obviously even if these two amounts of energy where the same (best case scenario) the whole system would be as "automotive" as a hand carriage. Anyway what you're saying (about vacuum energy maybe?) does not bypass such laws and scenarios in anyway. Enthropy ALWAYS increases and this roughly means that there will always be a loss through any energy conversion.
EVEN IF there was a practical way to immidiatelly convert mass into energy (since E=mc^2 thus specific amounts mass equal to specific amounts of energy) there would be a significant loss, most probably in the form of unwanted electromagnetic radiation escaping the procedure. See thermodynamics isn't just about "pistons" and "rotors". The equilibrium of energy is global. It exists in any kind of mechanics either thermal or quantum etc. That's why this car is nothing but rubbish.
@Alexunder3D E=mc^2 is deliverately wrong so people won't ask why we have to depend on Oil. The proof is there's been found and proved subatomic particles travel faster than light. If you want to tell me where the extra energy is coming from in this video, please enlighten us all. If it's something cheaper than the gas required in a normal car or just FREE like air, don't even bother to answer.
@applxperience This car used metal hybrid in order to split water into H and O. The metal hybride was consumed during the process thus the car didn't just need water to move. Every now and then (and I'm not talking about a few years or a few months) the hybride was consumed and had to be changed so as you see this car didn't run on water at all. It ran on some expensive metallic hybrid and water. It's like selling an electric car that has its onboard electricity generator.
@applxperience Why didn't anyone ever think of that right? "An electric car that has an onboard generator!" You'll never need to plug it in a socket and so you'll never pay extra to the electricity company! Yeah right but you'll still need to feed the generator. Now as for e=mc^2 and faster-than-light subatomic particles: can you disprove e=mc^2? (I would really like to see that). And yes the general theory of relativity has no problem with tachyons and their (theoretical) existance.
@Alexunder3D No, I can't disprove anything more than you can disprove the new findings CONTRADICTING e=mc^2. This is not a "who's smarter ass" game. The same scientific method is fulling your mouth to disprove this, is the method which proved e=mc^2 is wrong. Until a better explanation is found that saves e=mc^2, you'll have to leave an open door for the possibility this and other claims are possible.
And yes tachyons are elementary particles that always move faster than light. Hell! Even space can move faster than light! Massive matter however... well that's a different story because if something (consisted of mass) tried to even reach the speed of light, it would need infinite energy to do so.
@Alexunder3D Hey! you've just got the answer for the thousands of scientists scratching their head with the results of an accelerator the diameter of three countries! Go tell them!, not us.
I wonder why they are so idiots to keep insisting e=mc^2 is wrong. Oh, may be it's because they are real scientists! Corporate interests to keep e=mc^2 is bigger than the whole scientific community, so if here's EVEN THE DOUBT (there is) it must be because it's absolutely confirmed, but can't be admitted.
@applxperience Ah it's not three countries in diameter. It's really big but it's just on the borders of two countries mind you. Anyway there is a huge difference between "trying to explain some results that might redefine physics as we know it" and "tottally disputing theories that were repeatedly confirmend for the past fifty years because of one experiment". OPERA might have shown that some neutrinos moved faster than light but nobody is sure yet.
@Alexunder3D "…but nobody is sure"? Are you kidding me? The truth is "everybody is sure, but nobody wants the bullet in his head". Anyway, going back to the start: Same way you want proofs of this having a scientific explanation that matches "official" science, I want proofs of your allegations this video is fake. I want blue prints, photos, fingerprints. Oh, yes, less than that is not scientific proof. Invest your energy in taking power from air as many others did, but better.
@applxperience Prove? I don't have to prove anything. You can visit genepax.com and see for yourself. Their water running car doesn't run on water at all.
As a matter of fact another experiment (Icarus) contradicts the results of OPERA while scientist that were responsible for the OPERA results also claim that there is a huge number of things that might have gone wrong. Now don't get me wrong here I would love to hear that C0 isn't a cosmic barrier! Imagine the possibilities! It's just that I believe that nothing is proven yet. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
And where did you even see that scientists are desperately trying to disprove the energy-mass equivalence? That baffles me really because that is not the case! I don't know where you do your research but if I were you I would change my sources. This equation is even dimensionally consistent! It's that right!
i like to salvage the parts make it as a generator in house.... no worries on electric bills just telepone, water, taxes, cable and the internet bills........
@ashleyjbrew: I agree with you. However, H2O (water or dihydrogen monoxide) is also hydrogen hydroxide, which is H-OH or H2O. Actually, technically speaking, HOH is more accurate because the hydrogen ion (or H to the plus power) is positively charged and the hydroxyl ion (or OH to the negative power) is negatively charged. Hence, the hydrogen ion and hydroxyl ion are attracted to each other and make a better bond than does the dihydrogen and monoxide.
@InTheMist03200 .. the vehicle runs on ALL TYPES OF WATER nimrod.. that means seawater. Do you think we're going to run out of seawater any time soon? The vapor would remain in the environment and a lot cleaner than exhaust from cars and trucks currently.
i woudl like 1 :-)
l33tgam3r 20 hours ago
Folks, this is a hoax.
In fact, all H2O power claims thus far have been hoaxes when looked at closely.
The only way to get power from water is to split it into H and O, and feed the H to a fuel cell (for electric cars) or to the carburetor/ fuel injector (in a regular car engine). In either case, it will take more energy to split the atom than would be gained.
Wikipedia mentions that the company shut down.
lxw0052 1 day ago
im japenese
A3IOWN3DU 4 days ago
This is from the Philippines!
huhbrownies 5 days ago
What about pee??
richardandrewsjr 1 week ago
Awesome! We need to stop BIG OIL from killing this!
mkahrl 1 week ago
water machines to energy can have each resident :) Russia, Belarus, Kaliningrad is build nuclear electric only yourself
sunshineofpalm 2 weeks ago in playlist Favorite videos
I saw pigs fly today
and Ohh ya a car that runs on water
And the host says Hydrogen dioxide Ho2
That is not water
sushukrish 2 weeks ago
@vubear i'm sorry but i think the idea first came from Daniel Dingle of the Philippines way back in 1968. google for the complete details and how it did not come to commercial production until now. btw, the reporter is also careful to point out that this is Japanese "revelation" rather than "invention" as written in the title. anyway, i hope the Japanese, who are much capable in mass-producing this idea, could make it so that we won't be agents in the further destruction of our planet.
gmlxdm09 3 weeks ago
80 km/hour? I'm sorry but that's a modified G-Wiz. It can't do 80km/h even if it's falling for several thousand meters :)
Soksamurai 1 month ago
Ethiopia would be stuffed if this were the only mode of transport XD
ClinicallyObeseMule 1 month ago
The water powered concept has been working for more than fifty years. I have personally seen demonstrations. This site even had videos on this several years ago.
The reason this is not common knowledge is that the government has made it impossible for common people to purchase the supplies to build the hydrogen converter.
My brother and I even have the plans made by some of these inventors.
Here's the history of what happened to the inventors.
MasterYoist 1 month ago
I wonder why Youtube blocks the web address from showing.
Here it is. Take out the spaces.
w a t e r p o w e r e d c a r . c o m / i n v e n t o r s . h t m l
MasterYoist 1 month ago
this technology has been around for awhile...the reason it keeps getting squashed is $.. when billionares stand to loose trillions you better believe it'll get stomped out..
we built an electric truck in 98 for 10k that could go 80+mph and got 250-300mi per charge.. (3hr charge@240v, 6hr@120v).. if you really want this type of tech, you gotta do it yourself or pay someone to do it for you.. or wait about a hundred yrs for the greed-masters to catch up with technology..
GeorgeNada1 1 month ago
such technology will never be used by people, because of those greedy oil companies owners... they'll do anything to stop it from happen... and the corrupted politicians will help them do it.
elmariachi109 1 month ago 23
@elmariachi109 Technically a guy in america invented a water powered car like 20 years ago but he "mysteriously" died.
Redjoker96 1 month ago
@elmariachi109 don't worry mate those B******* can only go so far with their power eventually truth will emerge or oil will run out XD
IShadowZ40 1 month ago
@elmariachi109
I wanted to say exactly the same thing.... you said it for me.
ZZAKON 3 weeks ago
@elmariachi109 this is accually not a new idea people have died under *normal* circumstances while working on similar stuff before.
LordNezrok 2 weeks ago
@elmariachi109 your fucking stupid, the oil companies arent greedy, if theyre so greedy how about you ride a bike from now on. cant do it? then shut the fuck up. you buy their oil, so quit acting like they have you in a chokehold when you pay their salaries. nobody is stopping this from happening, its just not needed untill oil supplies are run dry. chances are this car is too expensive and not practicle enough, otherwise WHY THE FUCK WOULD ANYONE HAVE A GAS-RUN VEHICLE.
RESTxINxPIECEZ 1 week ago
@elmariachi109 Oh, gee, love the positive attitude. Remind me not to think like you. Yuck!
vinishdo 1 week ago
@vinishdo
He's being realistic. If you think that Water-powered cars will be on the market in the near future, you've obviously never read up on our history. A positive attitude is great, but you're letting it blind you from the truth.
DPepicelli 6 days ago
42 people just bought smart cars
DrDisasta 1 month ago
WoW --- go Japan go --- This is Incredible ---
watup2154 1 month ago
@watup2154 Let it be know that there was a guy in america who invented a water powered car like 20 years ago but he "MYSTERIOUSLY" died. The rich upper class government officials have billions invested in oil and their willing to "take care" of anybody or anything that stands to put a dent in their wallet.
Redjoker96 1 month ago
Japan saves the earth XD
117Burn 1 month ago 12
@117Burn Yeah but too bad they weren't the first to make it. The first was a guy from america like 20 years ago who "mysteriously" died. The technology never reach mainstream because some wanted to keep their wallets full of oil profit money.
Redjoker96 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@117Burn Yeah but too bad they weren't the first to make it. The first was a guy from america like 20 years ago who "mysteriously" died. The technology never reach mainstream because some wanted to keep their wallets full of oil profit money.
Redjoker96 1 month ago
every one can do it i converted my car to run mainly on water cost around 70 dollars for the parts check out my video on how to
cas410 1 month ago
fake
unitedstatesdale 1 month ago
Can it run on tears, because I have a lot of those?
tamerseeker 1 month ago
Added '2008'??...yeah, good luck with that car and "mass-production"!!~
transientdreams 1 month ago
常温核融合も含め、○○○の脅威になりそうな発明は妨害され、報道されない。
TK931112 1 month ago
bah il keep using oil
wordlofwarfan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
nice hat u got there
pudding0727 1 month ago
Now, WHY THE HELL don't we have people that are smart enough to build things like that HERE in the US?! We're just getting started with electrical cars!! D:<
samxlili 1 month ago
@samxlili because there is no companies willing to in dorse these ideas. i had presented an idea like this to ford ( to run an eletric current through water to produce hydrogen and oxygen) but they said they had no interest in my idea
jnthnrl798 1 month ago
@samxlili look up paul pantone, and you will see what happens to someone that threatens big oil
TheCmcskills 1 month ago
@samxlili We actually HAVE had people who invented this in the US. But the oil companies know they will lose trillions so they had them killed. If you think I'm joking look up Paul Pantone. No companies will endorse this idea because they don't wanna disappear either. When you come up with an idea that will make someone lose billions of dollars, why would it be unreasonable to think that personwill have youkilled and made look like a suicide or accident? Because people dont kill each other? LOL
meehalee21 1 month ago
@samxlili It is because of the goverment! There was a man who invented a h2o engine a while ago in USA. The man mysteriously "died" not a long time ago, and no one knows why. If the world will allow the use of H2O engine, the goverment would be broke. That is why we will never have a water powered engines in production/
EAsportz1 1 month ago
@EAsportz1 His name was Stan Mayer. He invented a hydrogen splitter that produced way more energy than it uses & with only a small modification all cars could run on water. His research was taken by nasa in the 80's & he was banned by the us government from working on it ever again. He was poisoned in I think the late 90's. Just look on this YT page, the secret is out & one day we will see these in production.
vubear 1 month ago
..."japan has invented an echo (eco) friendlt carrre that runs onnnn fuueell.. take a look" lol
Blahblahblah14898 1 month ago
If you want a simple explanation as to why this is a(n obvious) scam, go to Wikipædia: WATER-FUELLED CAR.
uszoninyc 1 month ago
But it takes power to make hydrogen. :?
BlueBetaPro 1 month ago
..."mass manufature their invention in the very near future." Yeah right already been three years and nothing, the inventors probably didnt get a patent due to unexplicable reasons or got filthy rich and dumped the project. Oil is a very very profitable source of money for a few already very rich and powerful people and they do whatever it takes to protect that source of extremely high income even if the alternatives wont polute or destroy the planet like oil based fuels do.
DR1ZERO 2 months ago
thumb up to japan,now just make it bigger and take over the auto market.sound so good it should be on ships going to car dealers,do they come in seudans and some in suv to take over the american market americans love big car!
ak74729 2 months ago
lol echo friendly
darkdylan01 2 months ago
The asians are high tech with them and there product but they all break fast and never last long
Babillabee 2 months ago
@Babillabee No that's the Chinese. Japanese products are the most reliable products in the world! For e.g toyota camry v6 MY00
dogeatme 1 month ago
the stonecutters are gonna keep this down
AliAbraham51 2 months ago
cool.
horaciopchanyau 2 months ago
water is not hydrogen dioxide dumbass
TheFashel12 2 months ago
umm bullshit, converting water into hydrogen and oxygen is an endothermic reaction, not an exothermic one.
Kalahridudex 2 months ago
1980's daniel tingel is the filipino inventor who invented this !!! FILIPINO INVENTION Made in PHILIPPINES.... Dont Forget!
chuckiesfest21 2 months ago
This is pretty tight. I want one. :P
ForumKorner 2 months ago
I have a serious question.
do you think if you're stranded and without water avalible. can you pee in it and it would still work? urine is acidic and would it mess up the components in the car or no?
rofflawl 2 months ago
@rofflawl WOW ARE YOU THIS FUKING RETARDED? YOUR A PIECE OF TRASH AND A WASTE OF EARTHS OXYGEN.
myersjonathon88 2 months ago
@myersjonathon88 I may be all of those.
but Umad.
rofflawl 2 months ago
@myersjonathon88 what a troll....
FadoDeo4444 1 month ago
The energy generator removes the hydrogen from the water and uses the hydrogen for fuel, but what powers the energy generator? If you want a car that runs on water, try a boat.
Firesprink72 2 months ago
I want to buy one of them cars, when are you bringing them to Ireland?
only4youreyes4 2 months ago
see what happens when you mess with the oil companies, you get a earthquake
downing619 2 months ago
Not saying im against this production, but what about our water supply?
IVIpact 2 months ago
@IVIpact they said it runs on 'any-type' of water... and sence there will always be the same amount of water on earth, we could just find a new market for 'cleaning' our dirty water/sea water to the point where it could be usable..
GeorgeNada1 1 month ago
Dihydrogen monoxide.
ebutemetube 2 months ago
This is great news!
How pure must the water be?
The only drawback is people will use drinking water to run their cars.
This should accept salt water from the sea, because drinking water is growing less and less every day.
Japan is the perfect place for this invention.
SaintlyMic 2 months ago
Asian = Eco English/American=Eeco
S0uLzTaEKeRz 2 months ago
This was originally invented by Filipinos but the Philippine government did not support this invention that's why the inventors go to Japan to seek help for the development of the product and now we can see other countries benefiting to our inventions
valsmen 2 months ago
@valsmen The guy you are talking about is "Inventor, 82, gets 20 years for ‘estafa’."
The feasibility of a water-fueled vehicle depends on the violation of thermodynamic laws; it's just not going to work.
kelvinilla 2 months ago
this is awesome but isnt the water limeted if we use it on cars then what we drink o.O
NartzxD 2 months ago
if this extracts hydrogen that means it must release oxygen too, that means that this would not only power things in say a bunker, but provide oxygen too.
RustyNex 2 months ago
This tech would've been available for years now. Good luck getting oil companies to allow this to ever be public.
colombiasb3st 2 months ago
pee water? XD
anyway lets just hope this actually comes out. all other water powered cars inventions seem to disappear or something.
aw **** make an improved steam powered car!
we already improved gas engines that we could fly a plane. all we need is cheap transportation to our jobs na a jet. well not yet XD
skyekross 2 months ago
@skyekross note on a jet.. stupid keyboard
skyekross 2 months ago
I wish they would sell these here.
weldon29 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the last guy that invented this died shortly after.
hack2makelivesbetter 2 months ago
AMAZING!!!!
EverythingOtaku 2 months ago
see Wiki article: Water-fuelled car
newcome880 2 months ago 2
have you ever see a ferrari, bugatti or lamborghini running on water? i wish like to have a waterfueled chrystler
king4allstars 3 months ago
This kind of technology has been out there for years. Good luck getting the Gov't and money hungry illuminati from sabotaging its distribution.
MrMoon360 3 months ago
its a G-Wiz
Annihilator1111 3 months ago
They must have found an easy way to split the water molecule into separate atoms. Probably a better battery in case of electrolysis. Then again maybe ...cold fusion! Hehehe.
CnSee02 3 months ago in playlist Liked videos
41 people are smart. Any half baked 5th grader knows it takes more energy for the electrolysis process then you get from the fuel. This violates the Clausius Statement. The HHV or LHV for water is non existent, deal with it!
Alias828 3 months ago
Is that the company that declared bankruptcy after the tsunami?
Or that was the MOCO car?
Anyway, there are cars running on nothing (energy from air and battery never recharged, like Tesla car) and they are "reminded" to keep it for themselves. No financial support, nothing.
If you have one of those and are "allowed" to go on the news (most news networks are owned by the same bad guys) is because you are part of them, or have a contract signed with blod to NEVER make it to the market.
applxperience 3 months ago
why is this not for sale yet?!?
ingimarsi 3 months ago
@ingimarsi because this is a scam, and not possible without some kind of extra energy input for the electrolysis process, usually this external energy comes from a coal power-plant
Alias828 3 months ago
Oil companies would never allow this to become global. It would destroy them.
sebmeikle 3 months ago
"In early 2009, Genepax announced they were closing their website, citing large development costs."... Fraud Source: wikipedia
alastorX10 3 months ago
wow those guyz are smart,i bet they will have a strong military but now it's gone..
xXKewlRagDollXx 3 months ago
@cyberlord64 It is. Splitting water into oxygen and hydrogen in the first place takes a great deal of energy, and obvious you can't get more energy back magically. I can't believe so many people took this seriously.
Fwright88 3 months ago
@Fwright88 refining yellow cake ore as gases in centrifuges takes a lot of energy also but magically it works, I can't believe anyone took Einstien seriously.
huntncomfort 3 months ago
@huntncomfort I'm not sure what the Einstein comment has to do with anything. However, refining various ores via various processes to refine fissile materials works because you're expending mechanical energy during refining. But you get energy out via nuclear fission. They're unrelated processes. However, the reason it works is not "magical". The fissile material is highly unstable. And so if you impart enough starting energy, it will undergo a chain reaction which gives off a lot of energy.
Fwright88 3 months ago
@huntncomfort This relies on the instability of the the fissile material. During fission, the materials go from a high-energy unstable state to a low-energy relatively stable one. The mechanical energy spent in refining did not make the material unstable on an atomic level, it was unstable before we processed it. So, we spend some energy in processing, but get a lot more out in fission. However, water is incredibly stable to begin with. The fact that life exists in the way it does relies on that
Fwright88 3 months ago
Any time we generate energy, it's by allowing some material to move from a high energy state to a low energy one. Internal combustion engines work by burning the large relatively unstable organic molecules in gasoline (or petrol), diesel, and similar fuels in the presence of oxygen. The product is ideally a mixture of carbon dioxide and water plus traces, both of which are highly stable. This difference in stability occurs as energy is lost from the molecules and forms heat, which we use.
Fwright88 3 months ago
In the case of hydroelectric energy, we take water at a higher altitude, where it has more gravitational potential energy, and allow it to flow downward through turbines. In the process it loses gravitational potential energy. We harvest some of that energy, in the turning of the turbines. But again, the energy has lost energy in some sense. Here, as gravitational potential energy. In nuclear power, we take unstable heavy elements, which decay to less unstable lighter elements, giving off heat
Fwright88 3 months ago
In the previous three examples, chemical, mechanical, and atomic, we start with a high energy substance, it loses energy, and we harvest some of that energy. The thing about water, is that it is very stable. And stable substances do not make good fuel sources. In fact, they aren't fuel sources at all under most circumstances.
Fwright88 3 months ago
this is VERY strange. If the device takes out the hydrogen from water to produce energy, cant they then use that hydrogen to combine it again with atmospheric air to then produce water? This is allready done btw. Then you wouldn't need fuel at all. water to hydrogen to water. I don't know the details behind it's operation but it seems a lot like overunity.
cyberlord64 3 months ago
Gallon of water = 0.99$
Gallon of gas = 3.00-4.00$
do the math.
TheGamersTrend 3 months ago
@TheGamersTrend gallon of water 0.99$? seriously? try tap water for 0.02$ or filtering sea water for free
cyberlord64 3 months ago
@cyberlord64 supposing it only ran out spring water, idk
TheGamersTrend 3 months ago
very near future? this was over 3 years ago lol
thalanoth 3 months ago
Then came the tsunami.... I'm guessing "someone" didn't want it to be mass manufactured which would hurt oil companies' huge profits and infinite wealth for illuminatis. See submarine weapons and H.A.R.P.
SlaveForCash 3 months ago
che l'inventore sia ancora vivo?
impazzitoinvolo 3 months ago
WTF? They didnt invent it .they took credit from a filipino who invented that , why japan took credit ? ..hmm our fucked up government couldnt careless about these great ,excellent idea's ..so they let our inventor's sell up their invention.
JimzCJ 3 months ago
I'm sure people have mentioned this before. This is basically a fuel cell car. In simple terms, the energy generated is by a process in which two different metals are sitting in a solution which generates a potential charge. This video can be misleading because it DOESN'T run on water! The water is the solution in which these two metal is submerged in. What I want to know is, what metals are they? Some metals provide a ton of energy in this process but are very rare and costly.
TheCoolfez 3 months ago
5 bucks oil execs/agents are knocking on their door with a silencer pistol.
Riddlerx333x 3 months ago
echo friendly? try eco
Snobert 4 months ago
@Snobert I don't know why some people pronounce it like that :P
04smallmj 3 months ago
If they can make standard sized cars/trucks/vans/ etc that can run on this, we can say goodbye to companies like Exxon Mobil, BP, and Shell - companies that are absolutely annihilating our ecosystem.
SevenFootPelican 4 months ago 8
@SevenFootPelican the oil companies will buy the rights to this and hide it away like all the other free energy devices they own
blumpkinable 2 months ago
@SevenFootPelican Standard? Standard is not whats consuming the most crude. Lot at the Semi's, Trains, Buses. Gotta go bigger than Standard. ;)
SgtToughLove 2 months ago
@SevenFootPelican yeah but we will run out of water -_- eventually
MagicXenomorph 2 months ago
@MagicXenomorph acutualy there is always the same amount of water on earth at all times.. it just keeps getting recycled over and over..
GeorgeNada1 1 month ago
@GeorgeNada1 ok...i guess?
MagicXenomorph 1 month ago
@SevenFootPelican You would go through government bureaucratic, Lobbying, and Forginers to eliminate these horrible companies. Oh, also the New York stock exchange.
Abdikarimelmi 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
sooo fake look it up
elidontlie 4 months ago
watch?v=9ubY25mClGQ&feature=related. This has been done decades ago by an engineer working in his own backyard...Sad how this bloke will never be recognized for this.
MrRathbun 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The correct definition of the First Law of Thermodynamics is: "If energy is applied to a system to bring it into an other condition, the same amount of energy must be removed from it, to restore the original condition.
With this definition one can understand that if the system is water from start, when it becomes the original water again at the end of whatever process, no net energy could be taken out in that process - it would then have come out of nothing.
Thermospecialist 4 months ago
Bullshit. First of all that car is a REVAi. An Indian electric car also known as G-Wiz... Secondly you can't extract hydrogen out of water, recombine hydrogen and oxygene to water and get a surplus of energy. It's called thermodynamic equilibrium and you can't fool it...
Alexunder3D 4 months ago
@Alexunder3D
Made no sence. Do you believe we evolved from apes? Makes sence that you're one of those -.-
KimWingz 4 months ago
@KimWingz This has nothing to do with Darwin or religion. If you studied a little thermodynamics it would make perfect sense but obviously you have no idea.
Alexunder3D 4 months ago
@Alexunder3D Yes you can. You are not stating how much of each will come from original water. There's no surplus. It's you who is not taking in account the oxigen taken from AIR. So it's the hidrogen from the original water PLUS extra oxigen. The dis-information trick of "you can't make energy out of thin air" doesn't deny there is energy everywhere, wether you can scientifically understand it or not.
applxperience 3 months ago
@applxperience If you're so certain then by all means explain yourself. Do you have an actual theory in mind that states such a function that would deliver kinetic energy using nothing but water? If you have such knowledge then I guess it's a happy day for humanity.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
@Alexunder3D No, I don't have a theory to contradict thermodynamics or any other law, and I agree that there can't be surplus of energy by recomposing the SAME amount of water in the SAME state (energy charge in any form). I just want you to stop misleading people with the same sentence. We don't care if the car is not really running on ONLY water as claimed. We just care that it doesn't need to be refilled with paid fuels.
applxperience 3 months ago
Energy can be obtained from anything, and the fact you don't know how doesn't mean it's not there. This car could be running on H + air + static on air + dif of temp between here and space, etc, as present cars run on fuel PLUS OXIGEN. Why don't you lower the performance of present cars to include OXIGEN consuption? and wait! they need gravity and costly room temperature unlike the hundreds of degrees below cero in space!
applxperience 3 months ago
@applxperience Ok. First of all I am "misleading" people? Me? Did I present a fake water-running car? I suggest you did a background search on that car and find out why it was never produced. Secondly it is obvious (I presume) that energy is everywhere. After all most of what we see in the universe consists of energy (since matter is energy). The problem is harvesting that energy in sufficient and most importantly realistic ways.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
For example you can get kinetic energy out of steam but in order to get that steam you need combustion so that you gan get some water into a rich in thermal energy, vapor state. Then you'll lose a huge percentage of that thermal energy as soon as you'll try to convert it into kinesis (through friction etc) but most importantly due to an inescapable increase of the system's entropy. Exergy decreases through conversions of any amount of energy.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
In the example of the car above the amount of energy needed to convert H2O into HHO should be the exact same as the one delivered after reconversion of H and O into H2O. Of course this never happens due to the fact that this is the real world and the entropy of this system unavoidably increases through conversions (electrical to chemical, chemical to electrical, electrical to mechanical etc).
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
Obviously even if these two amounts of energy where the same (best case scenario) the whole system would be as "automotive" as a hand carriage. Anyway what you're saying (about vacuum energy maybe?) does not bypass such laws and scenarios in anyway. Enthropy ALWAYS increases and this roughly means that there will always be a loss through any energy conversion.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
EVEN IF there was a practical way to immidiatelly convert mass into energy (since E=mc^2 thus specific amounts mass equal to specific amounts of energy) there would be a significant loss, most probably in the form of unwanted electromagnetic radiation escaping the procedure. See thermodynamics isn't just about "pistons" and "rotors". The equilibrium of energy is global. It exists in any kind of mechanics either thermal or quantum etc. That's why this car is nothing but rubbish.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
@Alexunder3D E=mc^2 is deliverately wrong so people won't ask why we have to depend on Oil. The proof is there's been found and proved subatomic particles travel faster than light. If you want to tell me where the extra energy is coming from in this video, please enlighten us all. If it's something cheaper than the gas required in a normal car or just FREE like air, don't even bother to answer.
applxperience 3 months ago
@applxperience This car used metal hybrid in order to split water into H and O. The metal hybride was consumed during the process thus the car didn't just need water to move. Every now and then (and I'm not talking about a few years or a few months) the hybride was consumed and had to be changed so as you see this car didn't run on water at all. It ran on some expensive metallic hybrid and water. It's like selling an electric car that has its onboard electricity generator.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
@applxperience Why didn't anyone ever think of that right? "An electric car that has an onboard generator!" You'll never need to plug it in a socket and so you'll never pay extra to the electricity company! Yeah right but you'll still need to feed the generator. Now as for e=mc^2 and faster-than-light subatomic particles: can you disprove e=mc^2? (I would really like to see that). And yes the general theory of relativity has no problem with tachyons and their (theoretical) existance.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
@Alexunder3D No, I can't disprove anything more than you can disprove the new findings CONTRADICTING e=mc^2. This is not a "who's smarter ass" game. The same scientific method is fulling your mouth to disprove this, is the method which proved e=mc^2 is wrong. Until a better explanation is found that saves e=mc^2, you'll have to leave an open door for the possibility this and other claims are possible.
applxperience 3 months ago
And yes tachyons are elementary particles that always move faster than light. Hell! Even space can move faster than light! Massive matter however... well that's a different story because if something (consisted of mass) tried to even reach the speed of light, it would need infinite energy to do so.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
@Alexunder3D Hey! you've just got the answer for the thousands of scientists scratching their head with the results of an accelerator the diameter of three countries! Go tell them!, not us.
I wonder why they are so idiots to keep insisting e=mc^2 is wrong. Oh, may be it's because they are real scientists! Corporate interests to keep e=mc^2 is bigger than the whole scientific community, so if here's EVEN THE DOUBT (there is) it must be because it's absolutely confirmed, but can't be admitted.
applxperience 3 months ago
@applxperience Ah it's not three countries in diameter. It's really big but it's just on the borders of two countries mind you. Anyway there is a huge difference between "trying to explain some results that might redefine physics as we know it" and "tottally disputing theories that were repeatedly confirmend for the past fifty years because of one experiment". OPERA might have shown that some neutrinos moved faster than light but nobody is sure yet.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
@Alexunder3D "…but nobody is sure"? Are you kidding me? The truth is "everybody is sure, but nobody wants the bullet in his head". Anyway, going back to the start: Same way you want proofs of this having a scientific explanation that matches "official" science, I want proofs of your allegations this video is fake. I want blue prints, photos, fingerprints. Oh, yes, less than that is not scientific proof. Invest your energy in taking power from air as many others did, but better.
applxperience 3 months ago
@applxperience Prove? I don't have to prove anything. You can visit genepax.com and see for yourself. Their water running car doesn't run on water at all.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
As a matter of fact another experiment (Icarus) contradicts the results of OPERA while scientist that were responsible for the OPERA results also claim that there is a huge number of things that might have gone wrong. Now don't get me wrong here I would love to hear that C0 isn't a cosmic barrier! Imagine the possibilities! It's just that I believe that nothing is proven yet. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
And where did you even see that scientists are desperately trying to disprove the energy-mass equivalence? That baffles me really because that is not the case! I don't know where you do your research but if I were you I would change my sources. This equation is even dimensionally consistent! It's that right!
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
And sorry for the long post.
Alexunder3D 3 months ago
great job now where is it dumb dumbs lol
925shah 4 months ago
Big Oil got wind of this and paid them to stop production because they saw it as a threat to them
jmcclelland85 4 months ago
where is the car?
ultimatehosting 4 months ago
i neeeeeed that car ...any car that does not have to go to gas stations i hate gas stations
well done to japanese scientists
ae70gts 4 months ago
@ae70gts be patient :) you have to wait till water gets more expensive :)
filmkonnex 4 months ago
noice'
thedirtysouth1122 4 months ago
dihydrogen monoxide, the deadly poisonous gas the government and the men in black and the cia and the freemasons have invented to kill your grandma.
vmelkon 4 months ago
Are you saying this car could run off my own piss if I wanted to?
Skeletor4ever 4 months ago 7
Comment removed
Skeletor4ever 4 months ago
Hydrogen Dioxide? Thats not water.
indigestive 4 months ago
@indigestive true lol i thought it sounded weird. dihydrogen oxide xD
syiunshi 4 months ago
Echo Friendly?
MrYorkshireFella 5 months ago
i like to salvage the parts make it as a generator in house.... no worries on electric bills just telepone, water, taxes, cable and the internet bills........
12ock 5 months ago
Price? Buy one and run a generator while at home and save electricity bills.
mr1000rx 5 months ago
@ashleyjbrew: I agree with you. However, H2O (water or dihydrogen monoxide) is also hydrogen hydroxide, which is H-OH or H2O. Actually, technically speaking, HOH is more accurate because the hydrogen ion (or H to the plus power) is positively charged and the hydroxyl ion (or OH to the negative power) is negatively charged. Hence, the hydrogen ion and hydroxyl ion are attracted to each other and make a better bond than does the dihydrogen and monoxide.
bobtuda 5 months ago
0:35 They give water the wrong name lol. Hydrogen dioxide = H02. Water is dihydrogen monoxide H20.
ashleyjbrew 5 months ago
Whats an echo friendly car???
fightinandirish 5 months ago
@fightinandirish google it
renatosas 5 months ago
It would just spike up the price of water..
InTheMist03200 5 months ago
@InTheMist03200 .. the vehicle runs on ALL TYPES OF WATER nimrod.. that means seawater. Do you think we're going to run out of seawater any time soon? The vapor would remain in the environment and a lot cleaner than exhaust from cars and trucks currently.
msdangergirl1 4 months ago
@msdangergirl1 I never said we were going to run out of it moron.
InTheMist03200 4 months ago
Yeah, what happened to this company and where do I invest? Posted in 2008 and still no press?
bingyfire 5 months ago 2
The reason this doesn't exist is because it is bullshit.
TheboyPaj 5 months ago
Thats great! if you run out of water, just take a piss in the tank!!
nhs2008NC 5 months ago 2
Now Ive seen it all
LemonMunching 6 months ago
That's REVA an Indian electric car(1994) on which they built a new system though, sad... never gave credit to Reva?
ajshetty 6 months ago
Daniel Dingel Invented it.. He's a Filipino.. search it off the internet..
arjea1996 6 months ago