LMFAO Air America huh no ones cares about what you say, that is why you went bankrupt LOL for the second time LMAO you fucking liberals really think anyone cares what the fuck you think or say.
Right, the things he mentioned were minor fups. Try debating facts for a change. Oh and give me a break of on and on and on. Thats all you have you little pukes. And how about honesty for a change? How about you declare yourselves socialists, and lets debate it, instead of hiding behind doing good for others curtain
Also, yes, this IS an illegitimate presidency. Obama IS NOT a natural born citizen as per the Constitution. Period. End of story. Whether he was born in Hawaii or not is irrelevant. Libs own 80-90% of the media but all they can do is cry about FOX and talk radio. Beck, Rush, Palin..blah,blah,blah. Progressives= accuracy and honesty Frisch? What a fucking joke! You people believe your own bullshit at this point. Enjoy the coming Democrat bloodbath next November. It is coming libs, You're done!
aren't liberals funny? So mired in their own deceit that they can't even begin to see their own monumental hypocrisy. Liberals don't like Beck because, as this shithead Frisch states, "the video never lies." Well, Glenn Beck is a threat to the left because HE PLAYS VIDEOS OF THE LIBTARDS FOR ALL TO SEE. it isn't his commentary they hate, it's the fact that he reveals the true nature of the left by using their own words against them. So just suck it , libs. You want pure lies? Watch MSNBC...
Obviously you've never watched Fox news or you wouldn't make the stupid comment. LOL Keep believing the left,, you'll be left behind just like they will be.
left right it is all the same.politicians,news media personel are all alike,they say what needs to be said to achieve their goal.votes-ratings it is all bs.READ your CONSTITUTION,DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE and BILL of RITES.then go through the white house and news media personel and then you can get down to the real work."SORTING OUT ALL THE B.S.
RadarKat73080 Liberals have social conscience? You really made me laugh there. The only conscience I want from liberals is to leave everyone the hell alone. You social conscience policies have ruined many economies which in turn have ruined many peoples lives. And yes being able to live and feed your family is in the money. And what liberals see when it comes to money, is how to legislate so it will be taken from one and given to another. So lets not BS
Well, I may have to wash my mouth out with soap after this, but I agree wit you in principle. We should leave people alone! Starting with fucking up other people's lives! Whether here or in other countries! I would like to point out that Republicans were in power when the current recession began, so I'd limit my stones if I were you.
RadarKat73080 I dont care about previous administration, nor was I talking about it. Yes I know Bush was a fuckup with his liberal policies. And what is Liberal Obama doing to help? Exactly the same except with a much bigger cost. Not to mention taking over industries where has no right, nor the ability. And I dont remember people asking for Bushes third term, so yes I am pissed with your progressive/liberal (trash constitution) policies
RadarKat73080 Well let me see, I didnt call him a liberal, I said his liberal policies (try to read first) Legalizing illegal aliens is your thing, not conservatives. Baling out companies is liberal. Expending government is also liberal ideas not conservative. Spending like drunken sailor isnt conservative either. The skies are in my big world are normal color.
Almost everyone is from somewhere else, and most didn't bother to ask before they moved here. Which presidents actually shrunk the government? Most of the Republican presidents expanded the government, along with the power of the President. Most spent money recklessly. Iran-Contra? What kind of conservative are you? If you aren't now, don't you aspire to be a fat, rich Republican with a mistress and a dozen undocumented workers tending you mansion for pennies a day?
RadarKat73080 Most didnt bother to ask? Now which world do you live in, we have immigration rules and policies, took my family 5 years to come here (because we followed the law) Are you seriously going to BS me about illegal immigration? Shrinking government is what true conservatives want, liberal want to expand it, so dont ask about presidents we are talking policies here. Conservatives means follow constitution, and keep the fruits of your labor with limited taxation.
RadarKat73080 "What kind of conservative are you? If you aren't now, don't you aspire to be a fat, rich Republican with a mistress and a dozen undocumented workers tending you mansion for pennies a day? "
-EXCUSE ME? This is your idea of conservatives? Its sounds more like liberal idea of socialism which you liberals aspire to. And if you make one more retarded comment like that, I will simply stop debating you
RadarKat73080 Ok I thought you were an adult who can carry on a normal conversation. But my mistake, in absence of a normal thought out counter argument, you simply resort to childish behavior. That is fine with me, btw it wasnt a threat (not sure how you can possibly perceive me asking you to stop making stupid comments as a threat). But I guess our conversation is over.
There are no real progressive policies happening here. The corportists are being well fed. Bush gave tax breaks to the rich and started an evil war for oil. He appointed 150 people who graduated from Pat Robertson's university. Sounds like conservatism to me.
maulhoik War for Oil really?USA has an incredible amount of oil reserves,so if it was for Oil then he would have just let them drill locally for even more "evil" profit.Now that we have the war out of the way,the rest still holds true
Legalization of illegals
Expending government and its choke on business is PROGREEIVE ideas not conservative Doesnt matter where u graduated from,what matters is your actions,and if they are not in line with conservative principles then you are not a conservative
No one expanded government more than the last administration. I could go on and on about the rest of you hubris. But I'm pondering your "graduation" comment after reading your response.
maulhoik Yes I know that previous admin has expended the gvt (thats why I called that particular aspect of it liberal) Current admin is doing a very good job in exceeding expansion of previous admin. And whats with personal attacks? Do you honestly have zero arguments to present, that you need to go on personal attack? Seeing that you love Obama, I really wonder what YOUR level of constitutional knowledge is.
Sorry if i came off as personal. With so many kneejerk reactions around here I respond irresponsibly sometimes. I apologise. There is a lot that seems like poitics as usual with Obama (are we suprised?) But both parties expand government. But as a progressive I know that we can have great services with small tax increases. The entire ball of wax has to collapse for that to happen.
Don't let our oil reserves fool you; as a commodity many neocons would love to control it ALL for many reasons.
maulhoik Ball of wax needs to collapse? I sure hope you dont mean our whole system needs to collapse. As far as taxes go, you do realize that amongst many countries we tax the top %. Not to mention that increasing taxes further will put many companies out of business. Some companies margin is as low as 2% for profits.
Don't be fooled by the 1% myth. You are I are taxed in many ways. It's not always called a "tax", but it is, nonetheless. Much of the wealth of that 1% was earned by the masses, but never went to their paychecks. I don't believe in punnishing the wealthy. But there was a time when they paid a far bigger percentage in fed tax, yet we had a middle class second to none. The sky didn't fall, and we didn't depend on trickledown for prosperity. We are a republic. We need balance again, not plutocracy.
maulhoik "But there was a time when they paid a far bigger percentage in fed tax"--If you mean what you say here then, what this statement means is that rich didnt pay higher taxes but rather there were more of them. The thing with taxation is that you have to be really careful
1) Business might fail
2) Rich if overtaxed will leave
Oh btw when I said 2% margin I meant some business only make 2% profit, thus it is very hard to raise their taxes with ought "killing" them
Respectfully, these are scare tactics for the most part. Look at the economy after Clinton raised taxes (shortly after Bush 41 raised taxes). We still had a great economy. Yet we have bountiful tax cuts the last decade and virtualy ZERO job creation with a destroyed surplus.
I know I have made pretty black and white generalizations, but food for thought, nonetheless.
I was very conservative for many years. I understand your arguements. I just see a bigger picture these days.
maulhoik What I see these days, Bush days included, is government expanding into sectors it has no right to be in. Government spending is at record levels, dollar is losing its value etc.. Yes tax cuts alone will not help in the realm national debt. However tax cuts to certain extent will help job creation. Btw, its a major difference between tax cuts and tax rebates, so dont get confused, tax rebates do not help
We were on a path to sustainability, with a surplus by the end of the '90's. The dollar was strong. Deregulation (starting with Clinton) causing massive boom/ bust bubbles coupled with deficit causing tax cuts are the main reasons we are here. (oh, yea, how bout those wars?) By all accounts things would be worse if repubs were in power: they want MORE deregulation and MASSIVE cuts for the top 5%.
BTW, you must be dismayed by the wingnuts high jacking conservatism. Remember reason?
maulhoik Deregulations in some aspects do not cause bubbles, FED reserve causes bubbles (I know a great deal on the subject) Not to mention government directing resources causes tremendous bubbles (namely a long bubble in the making, housing industry Freddy and fanny) Regulating to death causes business collapses and inability for new businesses to open. Yes some regulations are needed, the rest are nothing but a burden
A burdon? Like Glass/ Stegal (I will own any mispellings!)?
Remember that this government belongs to all of us; regardless of how many or little taxes we pay. While decenteralization is cruical in many aspects, I can't help think that many have been so pitted against their own government, that any real attempt to safeguard has been demonized by the plutocrats who benefit the most from "getting government off our backs". The conversation has been poisoned.
maulhoik Of course government has an incredibly important role to play. Its role is to protect us, it is in constitution, as well as regulating business (keeping business flow regular). If you notice each regulation did nothing but gave mega corps. a leg up in competition. It is not governments role however to cater to a major corporation, nor it is governments role to run a corporation. And as far as taxes, how is taxing more will help the economy? Government has little to do with economy.
The government has played a role in times of crises since the beginning of the republic. And it's corporations that run the government, not the other way around.
And keeping us safe does not include spying on our phone conversations and quaker meet ups. Wars that are sold by media outlets have nothing to do with our security. Quite the opposite.
Taxes have in the past have reduced deficits. We must also cut waste and NO side wants to do that: republicans are even WORSE than democrats.
maulhoik I wasnt really talking about wars. Taxes reduce deficits? Please explain, Im not sure what you mean. As far as Republicans spend more than democrats, I seriously doubt that, this administration proves my point. As far as how much people make, I really dont care, as long as they dont get to make laws. If you dont like to work for $8, then work for another company.
Look at the Clinton Admin: taxes were raised and the deficit was reduced after Reagan's massive deficits and tax cuts. That's very generalizing, I know. But, historicaly, deficits have been smaller under democrats than republicans. Ike (who's not liked by conservatives) was the last fiscaly responsible republican (budget surplus). Whatever our philosophies are, niether of us like runaway spending. It's too early to tell the long term actions of Obama, but he can't blame the last admin forever.
Playing by the same rules that we must causes collapse? You want to see rivers on fire again, but one example?
And exactly where are these businesses ( where the employee makes $8 an hour, while the CEO makes $6,000. an hour) "collapsing? They cant make a profit without rape and exploitation? Don't even say that doesn't happen.
True capitalism would rise to the challenge. And there would not be a nanny state where risks are socialised and gains are privitized.
"True capitalism would rise to the challenge. And there would not be a nanny state where risks are socialised and gains are privitized." This is exactly what conservatives are talking about, we want true capitalism not what you have mentioned above. So we absolutely agree on that point
True progressives believe the same. We may have differences on political beliefs. But regardless, accountability must be demanded. I'm really saddened to see where conservatism is going. What happened to thinkers like Buckley and Sapphire? You must be dismayed at the noisemakers running the show. They behave the way liberals used to! And too many in office waited until Jan 20, 2009, at noon to begin acting fiscally responsible to be taken seriously.
maulhoik As far as Conservatives wanting to control our oil reserves, no we really dont want to. The whole idea of us going to war for oil is a bit farfetched, we dont even get that much of it from OPEC. Not to mention if this was the case, we would be at war with Mexico as well
It was not just about oil. It was also ideology: our fundamentalists verses theirs. The Iraq war is a hate crime, period.
As far as oil, it was not so much about taking the oil, it was coltrolling it, for various reasons. Did we need Irans oil 50 years ago?
Mexico? We use their blood in our factories. It's human oil; war without a shot fired. The situation is the way it is because we want it that way: the left gets votes, the right gets cheap labor.
Hannity also tried to chop and edit a speech from Obama saying that he was giving a platform to 9/11 truthers. But Jon Stewart called him out and showed the remainder of that section of the speech. Thank God Stewart calls out morons like Hannity.
@DaHonestAbe not a big Hannity fan but, are you kidding me? John Stewart from COMEDY CENTRAL is where you get you perspective on the world? That is where you find information and look for truth? You people are like cartoons. No sense of honesty, honor, fair play, self preservation or personal identity. You libs are pathetic. It is no wonder this country is in so much trouble.
Libs are pathetic eh? No more pathetic than cons my dear friend. And I watch Stewart to be entertained, I read to get my perspective. Particularly from scholars. However, the idea that you believe the left dominate the media just shows how far the right wing has its head up its ass. This country has been in trouble for decades now. And its been an effort from te ruling class, the republicrats and demicans along with NATO and many others. And please spare me the bit about honor and fair play.
Air America is DEAD for good reason.
NoGuff 1 year ago
LMFAO Air America huh no ones cares about what you say, that is why you went bankrupt LOL for the second time LMAO you fucking liberals really think anyone cares what the fuck you think or say.
xp741 2 years ago
crazzy glen beck. i should have voted for obama because he's a dream come true. 36 million on food stamps. change you can bla bla bla.
flightosafety 2 years ago
Oh and seriously what is wrong with this guy's voice? Im not making fun of him for that, just curious
samuils 2 years ago
Right, the things he mentioned were minor fups. Try debating facts for a change. Oh and give me a break of on and on and on. Thats all you have you little pukes. And how about honesty for a change? How about you declare yourselves socialists, and lets debate it, instead of hiding behind doing good for others curtain
samuils 2 years ago
Also, yes, this IS an illegitimate presidency. Obama IS NOT a natural born citizen as per the Constitution. Period. End of story. Whether he was born in Hawaii or not is irrelevant. Libs own 80-90% of the media but all they can do is cry about FOX and talk radio. Beck, Rush, Palin..blah,blah,blah. Progressives= accuracy and honesty Frisch? What a fucking joke! You people believe your own bullshit at this point. Enjoy the coming Democrat bloodbath next November. It is coming libs, You're done!
SoFlaPatriot 2 years ago 2
aren't liberals funny? So mired in their own deceit that they can't even begin to see their own monumental hypocrisy. Liberals don't like Beck because, as this shithead Frisch states, "the video never lies." Well, Glenn Beck is a threat to the left because HE PLAYS VIDEOS OF THE LIBTARDS FOR ALL TO SEE. it isn't his commentary they hate, it's the fact that he reveals the true nature of the left by using their own words against them. So just suck it , libs. You want pure lies? Watch MSNBC...
SoFlaPatriot 2 years ago 2
Fox News isn't news, but just the wacky opinions and conspiracy theories of the anchors who should be returned to the asylum.
luvguins 2 years ago
Comment removed
menana2u 2 years ago
Obviously you've never watched Fox news or you wouldn't make the stupid comment. LOL Keep believing the left,, you'll be left behind just like they will be.
Have a great day!
menana2u 2 years ago
Wrong! I have watched Fox, and watched it get further crazy. However, even Beck has now abandoned the birther's hoax.
luvguins 2 years ago 2
luvguins Which parts are wacky conspiracies? Quit being a parrot and repeating everything you hear. Think for yourself for once
samuils 2 years ago
left right it is all the same.politicians,news media personel are all alike,they say what needs to be said to achieve their goal.votes-ratings it is all bs.READ your CONSTITUTION,DECLARATION of INDEPENDENCE and BILL of RITES.then go through the white house and news media personel and then you can get down to the real work."SORTING OUT ALL THE B.S.
huntsman374 2 years ago
@huntsman374 It's Bill of Rights, noty Rites. Don't reveal your ignorance.
luvguins 2 years ago
is noty a word of ignorance or oops I hit the wrong key.guess there is always that 10 percent assholes
huntsman374 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the guy talking sounds like hes holding in his shit WTF is wrong with his voice is he retarded?
kneegrowslayerd 2 years ago
Progressives have more people but most Republicans are rich. So, they have more money.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
RadarKat73080
1) Liberals are rich as well
2) If the person in congress does what is right (as in protect the constitution etc) What do you care how much he has in his pocket
Oh you are very wrong on progressives,
40% identify themselves as Conservatives
20% Libertarians
And some are pure republicans, you are a minority my progressive friend
samuils 2 years ago
1. Perhaps, but most have some sort of social conscience. They don't see the aquistion of money or things as the end all and be all of existance.
2. The Good Book says: 'Where your treasure is, there your heart is." Congress does the bidding of those that pay their bills.
I consider myself a minority of one.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
RadarKat73080 Liberals have social conscience? You really made me laugh there. The only conscience I want from liberals is to leave everyone the hell alone. You social conscience policies have ruined many economies which in turn have ruined many peoples lives. And yes being able to live and feed your family is in the money. And what liberals see when it comes to money, is how to legislate so it will be taken from one and given to another. So lets not BS
samuils 2 years ago
Well, I may have to wash my mouth out with soap after this, but I agree wit you in principle. We should leave people alone! Starting with fucking up other people's lives! Whether here or in other countries! I would like to point out that Republicans were in power when the current recession began, so I'd limit my stones if I were you.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
RadarKat73080 I dont care about previous administration, nor was I talking about it. Yes I know Bush was a fuckup with his liberal policies. And what is Liberal Obama doing to help? Exactly the same except with a much bigger cost. Not to mention taking over industries where has no right, nor the ability. And I dont remember people asking for Bushes third term, so yes I am pissed with your progressive/liberal (trash constitution) policies
samuils 2 years ago
Bush liberal? What color is the sky in that little world of yours? Bush rivaled Reagan in being conservative! Which policies would those be?
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
RadarKat73080 Well let me see, I didnt call him a liberal, I said his liberal policies (try to read first) Legalizing illegal aliens is your thing, not conservatives. Baling out companies is liberal. Expending government is also liberal ideas not conservative. Spending like drunken sailor isnt conservative either. The skies are in my big world are normal color.
samuils 2 years ago
Almost everyone is from somewhere else, and most didn't bother to ask before they moved here. Which presidents actually shrunk the government? Most of the Republican presidents expanded the government, along with the power of the President. Most spent money recklessly. Iran-Contra? What kind of conservative are you? If you aren't now, don't you aspire to be a fat, rich Republican with a mistress and a dozen undocumented workers tending you mansion for pennies a day?
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
RadarKat73080 Most didnt bother to ask? Now which world do you live in, we have immigration rules and policies, took my family 5 years to come here (because we followed the law) Are you seriously going to BS me about illegal immigration? Shrinking government is what true conservatives want, liberal want to expand it, so dont ask about presidents we are talking policies here. Conservatives means follow constitution, and keep the fruits of your labor with limited taxation.
samuils 2 years ago
RadarKat73080 "What kind of conservative are you? If you aren't now, don't you aspire to be a fat, rich Republican with a mistress and a dozen undocumented workers tending you mansion for pennies a day? "
-EXCUSE ME? This is your idea of conservatives? Its sounds more like liberal idea of socialism which you liberals aspire to. And if you make one more retarded comment like that, I will simply stop debating you
samuils 2 years ago
I'm gonna buy boots so I can shake in 'em.
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
RadarKat73080 Ok I thought you were an adult who can carry on a normal conversation. But my mistake, in absence of a normal thought out counter argument, you simply resort to childish behavior. That is fine with me, btw it wasnt a threat (not sure how you can possibly perceive me asking you to stop making stupid comments as a threat). But I guess our conversation is over.
samuils 2 years ago
No, don't take your toys and go home! You are so entertaining!
RadarKat73080 2 years ago
There are no real progressive policies happening here. The corportists are being well fed. Bush gave tax breaks to the rich and started an evil war for oil. He appointed 150 people who graduated from Pat Robertson's university. Sounds like conservatism to me.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik War for Oil really?USA has an incredible amount of oil reserves,so if it was for Oil then he would have just let them drill locally for even more "evil" profit.Now that we have the war out of the way,the rest still holds true
Legalization of illegals
Expending government and its choke on business is PROGREEIVE ideas not conservative Doesnt matter where u graduated from,what matters is your actions,and if they are not in line with conservative principles then you are not a conservative
samuils 2 years ago
No one expanded government more than the last administration. I could go on and on about the rest of you hubris. But I'm pondering your "graduation" comment after reading your response.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik Yes I know that previous admin has expended the gvt (thats why I called that particular aspect of it liberal) Current admin is doing a very good job in exceeding expansion of previous admin. And whats with personal attacks? Do you honestly have zero arguments to present, that you need to go on personal attack? Seeing that you love Obama, I really wonder what YOUR level of constitutional knowledge is.
samuils 2 years ago
Sorry if i came off as personal. With so many kneejerk reactions around here I respond irresponsibly sometimes. I apologise. There is a lot that seems like poitics as usual with Obama (are we suprised?) But both parties expand government. But as a progressive I know that we can have great services with small tax increases. The entire ball of wax has to collapse for that to happen.
Don't let our oil reserves fool you; as a commodity many neocons would love to control it ALL for many reasons.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik Ball of wax needs to collapse? I sure hope you dont mean our whole system needs to collapse. As far as taxes go, you do realize that amongst many countries we tax the top %. Not to mention that increasing taxes further will put many companies out of business. Some companies margin is as low as 2% for profits.
samuils 2 years ago
Don't be fooled by the 1% myth. You are I are taxed in many ways. It's not always called a "tax", but it is, nonetheless. Much of the wealth of that 1% was earned by the masses, but never went to their paychecks. I don't believe in punnishing the wealthy. But there was a time when they paid a far bigger percentage in fed tax, yet we had a middle class second to none. The sky didn't fall, and we didn't depend on trickledown for prosperity. We are a republic. We need balance again, not plutocracy.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik "But there was a time when they paid a far bigger percentage in fed tax"--If you mean what you say here then, what this statement means is that rich didnt pay higher taxes but rather there were more of them. The thing with taxation is that you have to be really careful
1) Business might fail
2) Rich if overtaxed will leave
Oh btw when I said 2% margin I meant some business only make 2% profit, thus it is very hard to raise their taxes with ought "killing" them
samuils 2 years ago
Respectfully, these are scare tactics for the most part. Look at the economy after Clinton raised taxes (shortly after Bush 41 raised taxes). We still had a great economy. Yet we have bountiful tax cuts the last decade and virtualy ZERO job creation with a destroyed surplus.
I know I have made pretty black and white generalizations, but food for thought, nonetheless.
I was very conservative for many years. I understand your arguements. I just see a bigger picture these days.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik What I see these days, Bush days included, is government expanding into sectors it has no right to be in. Government spending is at record levels, dollar is losing its value etc.. Yes tax cuts alone will not help in the realm national debt. However tax cuts to certain extent will help job creation. Btw, its a major difference between tax cuts and tax rebates, so dont get confused, tax rebates do not help
samuils 2 years ago
We were on a path to sustainability, with a surplus by the end of the '90's. The dollar was strong. Deregulation (starting with Clinton) causing massive boom/ bust bubbles coupled with deficit causing tax cuts are the main reasons we are here. (oh, yea, how bout those wars?) By all accounts things would be worse if repubs were in power: they want MORE deregulation and MASSIVE cuts for the top 5%.
BTW, you must be dismayed by the wingnuts high jacking conservatism. Remember reason?
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik Deregulations in some aspects do not cause bubbles, FED reserve causes bubbles (I know a great deal on the subject) Not to mention government directing resources causes tremendous bubbles (namely a long bubble in the making, housing industry Freddy and fanny) Regulating to death causes business collapses and inability for new businesses to open. Yes some regulations are needed, the rest are nothing but a burden
samuils 2 years ago
A burdon? Like Glass/ Stegal (I will own any mispellings!)?
Remember that this government belongs to all of us; regardless of how many or little taxes we pay. While decenteralization is cruical in many aspects, I can't help think that many have been so pitted against their own government, that any real attempt to safeguard has been demonized by the plutocrats who benefit the most from "getting government off our backs". The conversation has been poisoned.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik Of course government has an incredibly important role to play. Its role is to protect us, it is in constitution, as well as regulating business (keeping business flow regular). If you notice each regulation did nothing but gave mega corps. a leg up in competition. It is not governments role however to cater to a major corporation, nor it is governments role to run a corporation. And as far as taxes, how is taxing more will help the economy? Government has little to do with economy.
samuils 2 years ago
The government has played a role in times of crises since the beginning of the republic. And it's corporations that run the government, not the other way around.
And keeping us safe does not include spying on our phone conversations and quaker meet ups. Wars that are sold by media outlets have nothing to do with our security. Quite the opposite.
Taxes have in the past have reduced deficits. We must also cut waste and NO side wants to do that: republicans are even WORSE than democrats.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik I wasnt really talking about wars. Taxes reduce deficits? Please explain, Im not sure what you mean. As far as Republicans spend more than democrats, I seriously doubt that, this administration proves my point. As far as how much people make, I really dont care, as long as they dont get to make laws. If you dont like to work for $8, then work for another company.
samuils 2 years ago
Look at the Clinton Admin: taxes were raised and the deficit was reduced after Reagan's massive deficits and tax cuts. That's very generalizing, I know. But, historicaly, deficits have been smaller under democrats than republicans. Ike (who's not liked by conservatives) was the last fiscaly responsible republican (budget surplus). Whatever our philosophies are, niether of us like runaway spending. It's too early to tell the long term actions of Obama, but he can't blame the last admin forever.
maulhoik 2 years ago
Playing by the same rules that we must causes collapse? You want to see rivers on fire again, but one example?
And exactly where are these businesses ( where the employee makes $8 an hour, while the CEO makes $6,000. an hour) "collapsing? They cant make a profit without rape and exploitation? Don't even say that doesn't happen.
True capitalism would rise to the challenge. And there would not be a nanny state where risks are socialised and gains are privitized.
maulhoik 2 years ago
"True capitalism would rise to the challenge. And there would not be a nanny state where risks are socialised and gains are privitized." This is exactly what conservatives are talking about, we want true capitalism not what you have mentioned above. So we absolutely agree on that point
samuils 2 years ago
True progressives believe the same. We may have differences on political beliefs. But regardless, accountability must be demanded. I'm really saddened to see where conservatism is going. What happened to thinkers like Buckley and Sapphire? You must be dismayed at the noisemakers running the show. They behave the way liberals used to! And too many in office waited until Jan 20, 2009, at noon to begin acting fiscally responsible to be taken seriously.
maulhoik 2 years ago
maulhoik As far as Conservatives wanting to control our oil reserves, no we really dont want to. The whole idea of us going to war for oil is a bit farfetched, we dont even get that much of it from OPEC. Not to mention if this was the case, we would be at war with Mexico as well
samuils 2 years ago
It was not just about oil. It was also ideology: our fundamentalists verses theirs. The Iraq war is a hate crime, period.
As far as oil, it was not so much about taking the oil, it was coltrolling it, for various reasons. Did we need Irans oil 50 years ago?
Mexico? We use their blood in our factories. It's human oil; war without a shot fired. The situation is the way it is because we want it that way: the left gets votes, the right gets cheap labor.
maulhoik 2 years ago
Hannity also tried to chop and edit a speech from Obama saying that he was giving a platform to 9/11 truthers. But Jon Stewart called him out and showed the remainder of that section of the speech. Thank God Stewart calls out morons like Hannity.
DaHonestAbe 2 years ago
@DaHonestAbe not a big Hannity fan but, are you kidding me? John Stewart from COMEDY CENTRAL is where you get you perspective on the world? That is where you find information and look for truth? You people are like cartoons. No sense of honesty, honor, fair play, self preservation or personal identity. You libs are pathetic. It is no wonder this country is in so much trouble.
SoFlaPatriot 2 years ago 3
Libs are pathetic eh? No more pathetic than cons my dear friend. And I watch Stewart to be entertained, I read to get my perspective. Particularly from scholars. However, the idea that you believe the left dominate the media just shows how far the right wing has its head up its ass. This country has been in trouble for decades now. And its been an effort from te ruling class, the republicrats and demicans along with NATO and many others. And please spare me the bit about honor and fair play.
DaHonestAbe 2 years ago
@SoFlaPatriot
"You libs are pathetic. It is no wonder this country is in so much trouble"
-Geez, ain't that the truth.
NoGuff 1 year ago