the troubling, and ironic, thing about this video is that it is assembled as if it were a piece of propaganda. my emotional reaction, as a skeptic, is to do a big facepalm.
Originally prepared by Popovic and dated just seven days before Gallo's infamous media announcement, the draft shows how Gallo made extensive handwritten "corrections" to Popvic's modest but honest statements, angrily crossing out inconvenient data and adding—with no scientific justification—bold claims that the virus that caused AIDS had been discovered. The most telling of the crossed-out lines: "Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified."
Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers
December 9, 2008
a British investigative journalist has shown that Gallo's claim was based on last-minute alterations to documents...includes a copy of Gallos handwritten changes to the article,a letter from an electron microscopy expert indicating that Gallos samples did not contain any virus,& a letter from Gallo to a researcher verifying that HIV could not be purified directly from human materials.
flu shots and even the flu itself are known to produce the 2 proteins that determine a positive status on the hiv test according to a 2006 New England Journal of Medicine report.
I love how this video says debunking the myths without showing any actual evidence to support anything.
If anyone has any actual evidence, factual only please, let me know...
Otherwise do your own research and quit listening to corporate sponsored propaganda.
AureaMean 2 years ago
the troubling, and ironic, thing about this video is that it is assembled as if it were a piece of propaganda. my emotional reaction, as a skeptic, is to do a big facepalm.
zer0nix 3 years ago 2
Originally prepared by Popovic and dated just seven days before Gallo's infamous media announcement, the draft shows how Gallo made extensive handwritten "corrections" to Popvic's modest but honest statements, angrily crossing out inconvenient data and adding—with no scientific justification—bold claims that the virus that caused AIDS had been discovered. The most telling of the crossed-out lines: "Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified."
mykoolaidtastesfunny 3 years ago
koolaid: Every paper gets edited on its way from rough draft to final publication. The claims in Gallo's paper were not "based on" the edits he made.
The letter from the microscopist did not refer to the samples in that paper. Do some research.
BrianTFoley 3 years ago
google...
Top Scientists Ask Medical Journal Science To Retract Original AIDS Papers
December 9, 2008
a British investigative journalist has shown that Gallo's claim was based on last-minute alterations to documents...includes a copy of Gallos handwritten changes to the article,a letter from an electron microscopy expert indicating that Gallos samples did not contain any virus,& a letter from Gallo to a researcher verifying that HIV could not be purified directly from human materials.
mykoolaidtastesfunny 3 years ago 4
Comment removed
conotoxin 3 years ago
flu shots and even the flu itself are known to produce the 2 proteins that determine a positive status on the hiv test according to a 2006 New England Journal of Medicine report.
hivquestions 3 years ago 14
Comment removed
conotoxin 3 years ago