9/11 FOIA South Tower Strike WNBC Helicopter Video NIST Release

[Scarfacepacker1]

You can also see the NYPD helicopter flying by right before that

[Scarfacepacker1]

She's in every video, literally, Edna Cintron, rip

[larrysandersjoe]

Look out for the second plane coming in from the top right hand corner at 2:15 - shocking stuff

[sop123100]

why have 40 people 'liked' this video, did i miss something? are people glad this happened?

[Qauntilize]

find it weird how she says "we will zoom out for a better vantage point" and as soon they zoom out the 2nd plane comes in like they knew it was coming then her reaction is "wow" 911 was so fake american goverment are crap at covering up their pathetic attempt at a terrorist attack.

[fockya]

israel, your secrets are being revealed...

[alawson911]

"Rapid Direct Decent, No Banked Turn". By this time, the descent angle was only about 3 degrees, following the pull-out over Liberty Island. It only appears as though the plane is steeply descending, becaust the camera is so high. If you stand on a bridge over a road, the cars are not descending, as they pass under you, but it may appear so. Further, the banked turn happened when the plane is obscured by the buildings, as seen on the Herzarkhani video. No surprises, here.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@alawson911 LOL, this is an orange. Further, the banked turn happened when the plane is obscured by the buildings ..... since 757s habdle so well above top airframe speed. The FBI videos are missing all that, they go straight in with very little decent, turn, or bank. Compare the "Al-Qaeda video" confiscated by the FBI and the FOX "divebomber" videos counting back 6 seconds. The world is an optical illusion to some.

[alawson911]

@IranContraScumDid911

Someone who doesn't seem to know the difference between the shape of a Boeing 767 lookalike (which hit the South Tower) and a 757, is not much of an authority. Watch "UA175 - the last 12 seconds" by achimspok and learn something. Then heed this:

When a man who is honestly mistaken hears the truth, he will either cease being mistaken, or cease being honest.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@alawson911 The wings and tail section did not even break off. The plane had no resistance. What doies Isaac Newton say here? IIn EVERY collision, even this one, there is an EQUAL and opposite force reaction on BOTH objects. Classical mechanics says you are mistaken. The stronger denser heavier fixed building hit the lighter, thinner, hollow, not fixed airplane with the EXACT same EQUAL force. The plane went right in like butter? You should have taken science, not phiulosophy, alan.

[alawson911]

@IranContraScumDid911

I did take science and learned about kinetic energy. The videos are the best evidence of what happens when a plane of mass 145,150 kilograms, moving at a velocity of 128 metres per second expends the massive amount of kinetic energy of 1,189,068 kilojoules, obviously making a large hole in the steel lattice wall it struck, and ripping the plane to shreds in the process. Then you can ask yourself, why did the building shake (reaction) and an engine core fall out if it?

[IranContraScumDid911]

@alawson911 The plane caused more damage to the building than the building caused to thje plane at any point in the collision? You just defied Isaac Newton. The speed and weight are force factors, but do not change the proven laws of motion. Collision forces come in EQUAL and OPPOSITE pairs. Equal means the same. The denser stronger static building hit the hollow weaker plane with 1,189,068 kilojoules (your number) but all wings and tailsection stayed on? Really? The Shake is from explosions

[alawson911]

@IranContraScumDid911

You are misinterpreting Newton. Thought of on a molecular level, what I have said about the kinetic energy involved does not deny Newton. And you've not explained the building shaking or the engine and other debris coming out of the building, except by criticising someone else's explanations. And you have not addressed the plane's last 5 seconds, with a proven descent slope of about 3 degrees, and not anything like a dive bomber. But, if ignorance is bliss.... My last word

[IranContraScumDid911]

@alawson911 I like to think of it on a collision level, like it was. The stronger denser heavier fixed building hit the weaker less dense plane with EQUAL and OPPOSITE force. It cannot be explained more simple. Go punch a tree or drive your car into something for proof, Isaac Newton explains all interation between two objects. Density and strength define the damage each will recieve from that EQUAL kinesmatiic force delivered versus the other objects density and strength. That is 100% FACT.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@IranContraScumDid911 Explosions? The building turned to dust in 10 seconds an hour later, eyewitness accounts, including firefighters, the lobby and plaza after the impact, impossible combustion and thermodynamics, videos of explosions, videos with explosion sounds, heat after the collapse hotter than the fire from explosions, the pressure pulse during this impact, the concrete blasted back out of the entry hole, combined with your "engine" that was white hot, on fire, and gained velocity.

[ed4ed]

The drone comes into frame at 2:14 its too slow for a missle, its NOT a commercial aircraft! Look at all the Official video's the plane is clearly seen in the fakes, THIS is the REAL craft that actually HIT the tower! 911 was a Inside Job, keep researching this!

[whole2th]

ReDIscov911.  COM

[twohseven]

Look at the bottom left corner, at 1:35, what is that black stuff oozing out of the hole in the building???

[andrewklay1]

@twohseven its nanothermite. It was used to severe the supporting beams so the tower would collapse.

[dimensiondali]

look this youtube video up: 9/11 - September 11, 2001 - The Media Manipulation - part 1/4

[MegaCrystalwater]

The reason she was told to 'Back Off' is because they didn't want video footage of the buildings collapsing. It would have been easier to see detonators going off at eye level rather than at ground level.

[fredlesson]

The question is not about those planes we all saw them.

The troubling facts are:

The building number 7 the third building that went down without being smashed by a plane.

No footage of a plane that hit the Pentagone

And no part from the shankville crash, no engine, nothing (but one passport)

Don't get distracted please!

[Tao2299]

I do not see a 757. Just compare the size of the hole in tower 2 to the incoming craft. this was not a 757.

[lizrdgolfer]

Where is the 2nd plane???????????

[nixatnite]

"That apparently doesn look like it is in the other building at this point" WTF? NO emotion at all! Must be a Govt Reptilian. geez she couldnt be human.

[jeromeeusebius]

@nixatnite

I couldn't agree with you more. I wondered why she didn't yell or scream at the impact. But your reptilian comment had me laughing so hard.

[nixatnite]

@jeromeeusebius true tho eh? very unhuman not to react in this situation.

[chrispyt77]

Who is the woman speaking?

Who did the FOIA request for this video?

How can this woman speak so clearly in a helicopter without the cardioid mic sound and helicopter noise coming through? Any audio analyst can tell that the voice is layered on top of the existing footage.

This is clearly cointelpro territory.

[Tomken12345]

If she was really there at all, she must have been stoned with some good sh**?

[MARSTEC1]

Watch the upper right hand of screen at the 2:16 mark on...A large Sphere appears and proceeds to follow a direct line to where the explosion takes place...More spheres appear...one flying away and another flying across the screen right to left...THERE WERE NO PLANES!!!!... THERE WERE NO PLANES!!!!....Stop arguing and open your eyes!...You have been taken for a ride America!...Wake the hell up!...

[veracity29]

I would have expected more emotion from someone witnessing this. Even vetran news anchors were affected by this and showed their feelings. As for the planes, I am still not convinced that there were any planes that went into either building. The first tower did not even have any remnants of anything resembling a plane from the vantage point that was shown on this video. As for the second tower, the plane came out of no where and seemed to make a last minute change.

[enticed2zeitgeist]

2:25, I didn't even see a plane. Is it behind the building in this shot?

[hyperthreaded]

..and btw. you can see that the plane IS banked to its left at the moment is vanishes behind the tower. So much for that.

[hyperthreaded]

Hey, if you want to prove that the plane did NOT perform a banked turn at the last moment, you shouldn't try to prove it from a video that doesn't even show the last four seconds of the flight. For a start, just use any of the dozens of videos on which the last moments of the flight are actually, you know, visible. Then show us that the plane does not make a banked turn on that video, and you'll be a big hero. Until then, you're just a conspiracy nut. Jeez.

[fotistis]

Oh well another zoom out and Bamm plane gets into the shot ...no boys not even this girl saw any plane coming in .... u know even you if u see something anything anytime you will say at least something ...not just an ...EEEAOO..only for the fireball

............

this video is fake the plane is a fucking transperent cgi

come on dudes its true they make us what ever they like BUT u have 2 choices take weapons and get to the streets like Egypt or sit there and wait to die

[PhuckHue2]

Bush was a nitwit. As soon as the plane hit I knew Bin Laden did it. Everybody in the CIA knew Bin Laden was about to do a major strike to the USA

[IranContraScumDid911]

@PhuckHue2 Bin Laden did not do 9/11, the CIA know that.

[boattrainpaddy]

@IranContraScumDid911 The CIA knew BL didn't commit 9/11. As the creators of the day's events, they would certainly know who was responsible!

[zenoist2]

Hmm it does like like its not flying straight and level.

Why do a lot these plane impact videos look different?

[newsense87]

@zenoist2

Because they are from different angles.

[nealehanvey]

That is not a jet liner...now way

[heskeylator]

i think this proves that the woman speaking on this video is to blame for 9/11, she acted alone (!)

[ToolFan68]

9-11 was an inside job

[AsPinkAsAPanther]

oh cmon.. that is not a 757.. that little ball has the same size from entering the screen to impact. a object that is going to smash out 75% of the length of the wall should be pretty visable at the point where it passes behind the building.

[wellifthemediasaysit]

Why doesnt the plane bank left as seen in all the other vids? strange?

[silkcat51]

So the "plane" comes in from over the river. Quite unlike the vids I've seen as the 757 flies over buildings to reach the towers. But then, the vids with the "floating bridge" are truely my favorite fix-it vids from the gov't.

Doesn't look much like a plane to me either. It certainly is small.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@babymalai I'm not too sure this 9/11 truth stuff is right for you. 2:14 there is a flying object coming into the screen two inches from the top right hand corner of the screen. The object clearly comes form the south-southwest, and has a decent rate steeper than seen in other plane videos. This is the famous "orb" video. Is it a plane? Not sure. Was there a real plane? Doubt it. The decent rate and heading are important when compared to other plane videos. It's ok, your catching up.

[CodeTwo2]

@babymalai ????

[TheRamsesII]

She's human. The situation is overwhelming. She tries to maintain professional composure. The video and commentary appears completely reasonable and real. Not sure that means anything in light of the entire 9/11 argument, but there is no reason to say that this is not authentic.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@TheRamsesII The significance of this video to me is the planes altitude, decent rate, lack of banked angle, and 200 degree heading. Not all second plane videos have this same approach. I believe this video is authentic, I have seen the whole video. Strange, fact, all the news helicopters in the air lose contact and feed from the stations for about 4 minutes between the two tower strikes. The first plane video seen besides this is the silouette that comes from west, level, and banked.

[CodeTwo2]

A completely fake-sounding commentary... no surprise, no emotion of the voice, no mention of the approach of the aircraft that lasted several seconds, or the explosion/flames, and the timing of her comment is all wrong. As to "does look like it is in the other building at this point": from this shot it is unmistakeably in the "other buidling".

It doesn't sound AT ALL like this woman watched that event in real time from that helicopter.

[Cantoffie]

Meh, this does not prove anything. She is simply in shock as to what happened. Te news organization is just telling them to back off due to the highly dangerous situation.

I am a 9/11 truther and I can honestly say this proves nothing.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@Cantoffie Watch more plane approach videos, and think of this. The plane comes from above the helicopter nose down in a rapid decent, with a bearing of roughly 200*, and has no banked turn. There are many videos with a different magnetic bearing, different decent rate, and a different angle of banked turn. This is one of the very first videos shown. I have analyzed this video very closely with zoom, edge detection, and light postuerization, that is not a 757. No single video is the whole case.

[hyperthreaded]

@IranContraScumDid911 Correct, it's not a 757. It's a 767. Jeez.

[tkieffer63]

@IranContraScumDid911 so is it possible to share your zoom? It doesnt even look like it has any wings. Thanks.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@tkieffer63 I posted it in the video reply section above.

[eye4quality]

That don't look like an airplane either...

[TheNextLevel11]

people are still not aware of 9/11 ey? 100% of the evidence points to the U.S govt being responsible and covering it up.

[psilvl1]

well the planes wings entered at angles. This is NOT enough damage to bring the towers down. Something else brought them down.

[FreedumbFighter28]

2 words. Emotionless robot.

[Freshtymer]

@FreedumbFighter28 Seriously.

[FreedumbFighter28]

@Freshtymer  yea...seriously.

[Freshtymer]

@FreedumbFighter28 I was agreeing with you. Too bad we can't inject tone into written words.

[FreedumbFighter28]

@Freshtymer --Seems the only one in this conv not takin it seriously is the reporter..LOL.....WTF, right? She says wow like she has lived in beirut her whole life and this is just another day on the job....

[Freshtymer]

@FreedumbFighter28 I think she was just in shock. I imagine it being a very intense experience to be so close to that event while it's unfolding. Or maybe she's a drugged up (antidepressant) 8 hour a day TV watching fluoride head that has become so desensitized that she can't even express emotions anymore.

[FreedumbFighter28]

@Freshtymer <---LOL...flouride? Possible. She did not see the plane approach or even knew that is what caused the boom...Seems like she dont know what the hell is goin on.The mic in her ear tells her what to do.This is demonstrated when she starts saying..."danger will robinson danger...".....uh...i mean....There tellin us to back off....

As for the plane...well....in this shot you cant really tell the plane was turnin at all can we? But it was...go figure.

[OzzyPatriot]

1: I see the flashed over the face of the south tower. If it was paper.. it doesn't seem to act the way I'd expect paper to drift..even given how air moves around tall buildings.

2: This anchor MUST be a native N Yorker. What an unemotional BITCH! (least she didn't laugh) We are hearing her speak off air as well as on. I can understand reporting the news calmly when on air. But being THAT unperturbed while sitting in a helicopter watching it live? Or she's in on the scam.