While the 5.56 has a higher initial velocity, it's tiny lightweight bullet relies on fragmentation to be deadly. Fragmentation stops around 2000 fps (barrel dependant 100-300 yards) with a 5.56. While it still COULD kill beyond that, it has stooped to the effective power of 22mag with FMJ slugs. A 7.62x39 projectile is easily twice the frontal area, larger yet in tumble. Because fragmentation is not required, it is highly lethal down to 800fps at 900 yards, provided You can still hit with it.
@QuattroStig. this is not a 7.62x39 (ak47 round), this is a 7.62x51 (.308)....big difference. the 7.62x51 absolutely has a longer kill range as it is one the US military's sniper rounds.
As much as i like this gun, don't bull pups tend to have more recoil, if so than I don't think it was a good idea to make it shoot a 308, 5.56 6.8 or 7.62 would do fine
Just my extremely humble opinion, not trying to start any arguments, but I think that the 5.56mm version of this would be a good weapon for the armed forces... Just my two pence.
@TheMoronProject Yeah but the military is realizing more and more that the outdated 5.56 NATO is a little to light of a round to get the job done in some situations. We also noticed that the AK wielders we fight have a longer kill range and take advantage of it in combat. The U.S. needs a heavier round with a longer affective kill range. I think It's time to develop a round somewhere between the 5.56 and 7.62 for military applications.
@Warpath2198 5.56 carries higher velocity at a greater distance than 7.62X39. How does one get to the conclusion that 7.62X39 has a longer kill range?
Hadn't had my coffee yet. So, here, have a bit of clear headed logic.
If said bullet actually slows down a bit, it won't overpenetrate, which means it's dumping ALL of its energy into the target. Same reason .45ACP is loved by its users so much.
@SemiAuto777 Look it up. It has the exact same ejection system, takes STANAG magazines, is chambered in 5.56, is a bullpup design and was developed BEFORE the RFB. So, to be fair, the RFB isn't an F2000.
it's interesting how the spent casings trickle out of the front. without inspecting the rifle up close, i'm surpirised that doesn't result in jams. really cool design though. the only complaint i've heard so far (aside from recoil) is they're harder to find than a virgin in a whore house.
Would be nice if the ejection system had some kind of spring to hold in the empty cartridge up to the point when it really ejects so no lose cartridges are in the weapon that can fall out when it is the last you need.
They have at least one for sale at US Firearms Academy in Reno NV. renoguns.com. That rifle is sweet, but looks like it kicks like a mule. Whatever you're shooting at won't like it much though.
@stak45DDS the target version of the rfb has a 32 inch barrel.
the remington MODEL 700™ SPS™ TACTICAL AAC®-SD™ has a 20 inch barrel.
they have identical caliber, so the rfb could be used as a long range rifle. However, 7.62 NATO/308 win isn't the most powerful, long range rifle cartridge(300 win mag and 30 06 are more powerful).
On kel tec website, it says the practical range of the target version of the rfb is 1200 meters
Released in the first quarter of 2009, still hard to get here in 2011. :( Kel-tec makes some interesting stuff, just nearly impossible to obtain from anywhere but auctions.
... omg - what happens if a bullet hits a brass flipping out in front? - seems to me like that can happen. At least in full auto if available. Guess eye protection is vital in this case.
The design is very sound but leaves a couple of things to be desired, it would have have been better if it was deigned to utilize Hk G3 magazines. G3 magazines are available worldwide at a very low price at $2.50 each, those mags are also extremely well made and very reliable. The selector switch must be AR-15 style.
So far I'm a "video game ranger' and '12'...any other Youtube cliche's you want to throw out there? Oh and 7.62x51 is a medium recoil round. If you like you can shoot one of my Nagants in 7.62x54 or Mauser's in 8mm for some real recoil.
Foreward ejection has been used by automatic naval guns (Mk 42 and 45), as well as the M-242 Bushmaster. But I wonder if the path may be a bit long, but that's me.
Check the Microtech Small Arms Research (MSAR) STG-556-E4. The rifle is an AUG Clone that can fire 5.56mm (.223 REM), 7.62 x 39mm, 5.45x39mm, and 6.8 STC.
haha thanks for your suggestion, right after I watched this video I looked it up and found it, apparently they use the C-products magazines and have the same issues as magazines with the 7.62x39 AR. The 6.8 doesn't look to unattractive though.
I want the 6.8 to become more cost friendly, hopefully it get adopted by the U.S. military, then it will become dirt cheap. Then I will for sure buy one. Can't hunt anything in my state with .223 other than predators.
@SunshineBayou10mm It might be an interesting design, but the front ejection idea doesn't seem very reliable. Conventional rifle designs still have far more advantages than any bullpup design.
@SunshineBayou10mm What happens if the ejection port is blocked with debris? Besides, the forward ejection system just adds to the complexity of the gun, increasing maintenance and decreasing reliability. The person shot maybe 20 rounds in a clean environment. What happens when you fire thousands on the battlefield with little chance to clean the rifle?
@1JesseW it happens to be more reliable than the M-16 mainly because the m-16 jams in controlled environments. the ejection tube is actually made of metal that retracts ammunition thus forcing it out with the help of the pressure and the recoil. but this gun most likely will need a .223 remington/ .556 Nato compatible barrel rather than the 7.62 (recoil).
@joejohnathan1 Perhaps your right. However, I think Keltec developed the rifle in 7.62 and not 5.56 because they want to appeal to the military market and not the civilian market. The US Army already turned down so many 5.56 designs.
@tiffyj85 Full auto is mostly for poorly trained troops, that's why burst fire is more logical as it is a balance between volume and accuracy. Volume is fine, but accuracy is final.
I'm happy to see that we're going back to real calibers here in America. :) I loved the M16, don't get me wrong, but I think we need to start using the old NATO 7.62s again. I'd love to see the RFB as a new service rifle.
@curseofa5r5a A 7.62 NATO rifle would never be used by police officers since it has too much penetration and could kill innocent bystanders, that's why police use SMGs and pistols.
@1JesseW It can over penetrate, in some cases, as do many other rounds, for example : 9mm is notorious for over penetrating it's target, this can be solved by using hollow points. 5.56 is the samem hollow points prevent over penetration. 7.62NATO doesn't really have a problem with over penetration as much as 5.56.
Im thinking about getting one of these, but im really worried about jamming. it seems like if brass jams then the gun is going to need to be sent back to the factory. Anyone got any incite about this?
@ms3bani Just like any firearm, but in this case if a round chimneys, or misfeeds or does not cycle properly it seems like it would be very hard to fix.
@ms3bani maybe it's because it's a bigger round or he maybe be using certain rounds like Wolf ammo (they have steel casings) and kel-tec guns usually have huge problems with Steel-casing ammunition so...yeah
@scaryalbino1987 From what I've read, people don't seem to be having and problems with that. If you think about it, unless a perfect sized pebble fell into the whole with force, nothing could jam it. The recoil of every round would shake any dirt through.
While the 5.56 has a higher initial velocity, it's tiny lightweight bullet relies on fragmentation to be deadly. Fragmentation stops around 2000 fps (barrel dependant 100-300 yards) with a 5.56. While it still COULD kill beyond that, it has stooped to the effective power of 22mag with FMJ slugs. A 7.62x39 projectile is easily twice the frontal area, larger yet in tumble. Because fragmentation is not required, it is highly lethal down to 800fps at 900 yards, provided You can still hit with it.
mdntepoet 1 week ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
@QuattroStig. this is not a 7.62x39 (ak47 round), this is a 7.62x51 (.308)....big difference. the 7.62x51 absolutely has a longer kill range as it is one the US military's sniper rounds.
leongaines 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
leongaines 2 weeks ago
Halo reach battle rifle
VenTaraki 2 weeks ago
As much as i like this gun, don't bull pups tend to have more recoil, if so than I don't think it was a good idea to make it shoot a 308, 5.56 6.8 or 7.62 would do fine
THEKOOL4iDMAN697 1 month ago
this rifle in 223/5.56/7.62x39/5.45x39 would be one of the best infantry rifles ever invented, hands down kel tec
leomantles 1 month ago
will this fire 7.62x39?
peptopro17 2 months ago
@peptopro17 no, it's a 7.62 nato, a .308 round
meacri1 1 month ago
@peptopro17 Not it fires the bigger .308 round NATO
Warpath2198 1 month ago
I like this
gramboss187 2 months ago
There is a one year waiting list for this rifle at my local gun shop!
southerndeth 2 months ago
that looks like it kicks like mule! I think i am gonna buy myself one for christmas :)
custom240sx 2 months ago
no auto?
basicproblem 3 months ago
It poops casings...
galaktar 3 months ago 10
Just my extremely humble opinion, not trying to start any arguments, but I think that the 5.56mm version of this would be a good weapon for the armed forces... Just my two pence.
SemiAuto777 3 months ago
@SemiAuto777 I think I heard somewhere that they're making versions for 5.56x45, 7.62x39, 6.5 Grendel, and 6.8 Remington.
nightember 3 months ago
@SemiAuto777
The 5.56 NATO is a good all-arounder. Since it is also common as all get out, it would just be practical to chamber the RFB for it.
TheMoronProject 2 months ago
@TheMoronProject Yeah but the military is realizing more and more that the outdated 5.56 NATO is a little to light of a round to get the job done in some situations. We also noticed that the AK wielders we fight have a longer kill range and take advantage of it in combat. The U.S. needs a heavier round with a longer affective kill range. I think It's time to develop a round somewhere between the 5.56 and 7.62 for military applications.
mattdidit84 2 months ago
@mattdidit84 AK47 longer kill range than M4? I think you have your facts wrong.
QuattroStig 1 month ago
@QuattroStig Its does have a longer range, what military were you part of?
Warpath2198 1 month ago
@Warpath2198 5.56 carries higher velocity at a greater distance than 7.62X39. How does one get to the conclusion that 7.62X39 has a longer kill range?
QuattroStig 1 month ago 2
@QuattroStig Bigger bullet, more accurate by default.
Azereiah 3 weeks ago
@Azereiah Umm, you need to look up bullet velocity statistics more.
Nationofhonor 3 weeks ago
@Nationofhonor
Hadn't had my coffee yet. So, here, have a bit of clear headed logic.
If said bullet actually slows down a bit, it won't overpenetrate, which means it's dumping ALL of its energy into the target. Same reason .45ACP is loved by its users so much.
Azereiah 3 weeks ago
@TheMoronProject Problem with that is the competition would have been too great for the RFB in 5.56
Jadervason 1 month ago
@SemiAuto777 Something like that already exists... It's called the FN F2000.
ChishioAme 2 months ago
@ChishioAme
Yes, but it isn't the RFB now is it?
SemiAuto777 2 months ago
@SemiAuto777 Look it up. It has the exact same ejection system, takes STANAG magazines, is chambered in 5.56, is a bullpup design and was developed BEFORE the RFB. So, to be fair, the RFB isn't an F2000.
ChishioAme 2 months ago
@ChishioAme
I know what an F2000 is... I just prefer the RFB more.
SemiAuto777 2 months ago
Lets see the target grouping
baldbollocks 3 months ago
it's interesting how the spent casings trickle out of the front. without inspecting the rifle up close, i'm surpirised that doesn't result in jams. really cool design though. the only complaint i've heard so far (aside from recoil) is they're harder to find than a virgin in a whore house.
m0uth4th3war 3 months ago
Interesting forward ejecting design.
TWutangT 4 months ago
she is beautiful
lawker777 4 months ago
Holy crap, that's a powerful gun.
I've always thought that bullpups are freakin' ugly guns, but it's hard to deny that their design is anything less than genius.
MeanEyedCats 4 months ago
Would be nice if the ejection system had some kind of spring to hold in the empty cartridge up to the point when it really ejects so no lose cartridges are in the weapon that can fall out when it is the last you need.
XTwina 4 months ago
now if i could only find molle pouches for fal mags
choopdewoot 4 months ago
Thats got to be hell on the shoulder.
onebigkahuna69 4 months ago
shells eject kinda funny
Gunnut321 5 months ago
@Gunnut321 Yeah they kinda just poop out the top but that means both lefties and righties can use it.
joecow12 5 months ago
@joecow12 I love the poop reference!
LordDraxxos09 5 months ago
recoil looked pretty strong...any opions???
frankie2234 5 months ago
@frankie2234
its a 308 And a bullpup, yea theres gunna be sum extra recoil
Gunnut321 5 months ago
I would buy this over any other bullpup if they made this in a 223 version.
jpap967 6 months ago
Or maybe it is a variant.
Luaman55 6 months ago
The Azazel from Combat Arms is based off this gun.
Luaman55 6 months ago
eww gun poop
imnotryan 6 months ago
Reloading is the best :D
KingEinzeller 6 months ago
whenever i search for guns, there is always something that says "(insert gun here) full auto" no matter what gun it is
for example "rfb full auto"
:-|
MushroomPictures 6 months ago
@MushroomPictures
Full auto is shit. You hold the trigger for more than 3 shots and the gun is in the air. Single shot is far better.
stoogemoedude 6 months ago
@stoogemoedude depends on the gun and cartridge... :(
AzVnFreestyle 6 months ago
@stoogemoedude i'm pretty sure the m16 doesn't have that problem because it has negligible recoil
MushroomPictures 6 months ago
@MushroomPictures
Don't forget that you use up your ammo in about 2-3 seconds when you go full auto too. Burst/semi is far better.
stoogemoedude 6 months ago
@stoogemoedude yeah.
but full auto has it's place, in a few situations
MushroomPictures 6 months ago
17 zombies don't want people to have this gun when they rise from the grave.
PrivateSnowballTFC 6 months ago
They have at least one for sale at US Firearms Academy in Reno NV. renoguns.com. That rifle is sweet, but looks like it kicks like a mule. Whatever you're shooting at won't like it much though.
bwtatz99 6 months ago
Could this work as a long range rifle like Remingtion 700?
stak45DDS 7 months ago
@stak45DDS the target version of the rfb has a 32 inch barrel.
the remington MODEL 700™ SPS™ TACTICAL AAC®-SD™ has a 20 inch barrel.
they have identical caliber, so the rfb could be used as a long range rifle. However, 7.62 NATO/308 win isn't the most powerful, long range rifle cartridge(300 win mag and 30 06 are more powerful).
On kel tec website, it says the practical range of the target version of the rfb is 1200 meters
MushroomPictures 6 months ago
werent the AUG and F2000 also ambidextrous?
Aqueries44 7 months ago
@Aqueries44 The F2000 was ambi, but the AUG wasn't really. However, the AUG could be converted for lefties... so in a way it was. Neither fire .308.
TROOPERfarcry 6 months ago
1:18 The gun and I just cummed!!!
mattman91c 7 months ago
You realize your Holo's mounted backwards, right?
ForfeMac 7 months ago
@ForfeMac your stupid!
snobord786 4 months ago
@snobord786 Well, at Least I know the difference between 'Your' and 'You're'
ForfeMac 4 months ago
who the fuck would pay 1800-2000$ for a piece of shit keltec? i mean seriously. These fuckers on the auction sites have lost there damn minds.
Duckyistrippin 7 months ago
ITS A BULLPUP FAL FOR ANY THAT DONT KNOW
Legokink1 7 months ago
iv been scouring gun shops looking for one of these
rainmaker3592 7 months ago
if they made this gun in .223 I would buy it in a heartbeat
hobosapien081 7 months ago
@hobosapien081 like the fs2000?
RainMan002 7 months ago
@RainMan002 no, I meant the forward ejecting function, I hate when my M4 throws its empty cartridges everywhere...
hobosapien081 7 months ago
Recoil is a big problem
kidd20grams 7 months ago
about the recoil:
target practice: $#@!! Hahahaha!!
real gunfight: $#@!! $#@!!
gran5turismo 7 months ago
Just needs to be in a higher calibre.
joezzzify 8 months ago
@joezzzify I hope you're joking o_o 7.62 is too much power for such a small gun... Look at it, it kicks more than a FAL I'm sure...
kokochan7 7 months ago
@kokochan7 AND a bit bigger.
joezzzify 7 months ago
Dear Santa...
THEKOOL4iDMAN697 8 months ago
Recoil looks like a bitch
trejo598 8 months ago
@trejo598 I thought the same, 7.62 in such a small rifle looks painful.
kokochan7 7 months ago
Oh Kel-tec. You craaaazy.
Gabricokun 8 months ago
rifle folding bullpup?
jonasldg 8 months ago
thats ingenious! an ambidextrous bullpup! take THAT all you bullpup haters!
Rossco139 8 months ago 24
@Rossco139 Most bullpups are...
brandonha 6 months ago
@Rossco139 that's been around since the 70s in the AUG, it's a great idea.
TAS0AadvarK 4 months ago
@Rossco139 What's so special about that? The Steyr AUG is bullpup and ambidextrous, and it's a much older firearm.
TheMohawkNinja 4 months ago
@TheMohawkNinja you dont need to adjust for annything, and its 7.62x51mm nato
its sertainly quite special overall
13thmistral 4 months ago
Released in the first quarter of 2009, still hard to get here in 2011. :( Kel-tec makes some interesting stuff, just nearly impossible to obtain from anywhere but auctions.
nadieselgirl 8 months ago 16
Comment removed
nadieselgirl 8 months ago
Looks like it kicks more than my 30-06! Or is it just him?
Silver00Coin 8 months ago
plop plop plop goes the cartidges
garytang182 8 months ago
... omg - what happens if a bullet hits a brass flipping out in front? - seems to me like that can happen. At least in full auto if available. Guess eye protection is vital in this case.
drMerkwuerdigliebe 8 months ago
Gots to have one!
maugcore 8 months ago
The design is very sound but leaves a couple of things to be desired, it would have have been better if it was deigned to utilize Hk G3 magazines. G3 magazines are available worldwide at a very low price at $2.50 each, those mags are also extremely well made and very reliable. The selector switch must be AR-15 style.
commybuster 8 months ago
It's a 7.62x51 NATO, essentially a slightly shortened version of the 30-06. There are muzzlebrakes that can help with the recoil.
MadMichigander1313 9 months ago
what a fuck load of recoil
kevin71127 9 months ago
KEL-TEC makes weird guns lol.
Humberto4790 9 months ago
God I wish I had the money to buy one of these beauties.
Oh well.
therealCG62 9 months ago
looks like the DMR...lolz.....should replace the steyr aug as marksmans rifle...looks good
hellrazor117 9 months ago
look at that little fuckin cqb rifle beating the fuck outta this dude!
kewlneasy88 9 months ago
Recoil kicks that muppet like hell haha
ChrisDog000 9 months ago
why 7.62 NATO, no one will buy this
they should have used 5.56 like everyone else
tHeWasTeDYouTh 9 months ago
1:17の薬莢wwかっこいいよね
前から薬莢ってのもかっこいい
Roizel 9 months ago
lol look at the wall, somebody was stupid
p90lover 10 months ago
Better money invested in an AR10 then this.
richiestang78 10 months ago
@richiestang78-- Better money invested in an AR 10? And why is that?
usarmycaptainamerica 10 months ago
Looks like a lot of kick to it.
NostalgicLink 10 months ago
Alot of $
On and down range
patjohnw1 10 months ago
What kind of sights are they using?
Jonin87 10 months ago
7.62x51mm is too much recoil
Thx1138d 10 months ago
@Thx1138d
Yes it is...If you're a pussy that is.
snapcane 10 months ago
How much military time do you have video game ranger?
Thx1138d 10 months ago
@Thx1138d
I didn't realise you needed to be in the military to shoot a rifle you fucking moron.
snapcane 10 months ago
I am sure you do need not worry about that since you sound like your about twelve.
Thx1138d 10 months ago
@Thx1138d
So far I'm a "video game ranger' and '12'...any other Youtube cliche's you want to throw out there? Oh and 7.62x51 is a medium recoil round. If you like you can shoot one of my Nagants in 7.62x54 or Mauser's in 8mm for some real recoil.
snapcane 10 months ago
@Thx1138d
Wait I'm sorry,didn't realise you're mentally challenged. I mean only someone with brain damage would like Bill Maher.
snapcane 10 months ago
Based on your image profile of the middle finger I diagnoses you have some severe issues. Spent time in Juvi Hall have you?
Thx1138d 10 months ago
@Thx1138d
Typical moonbat bullshit. Have a nice night.
snapcane 10 months ago
Hmmm.. might need a muzzle brake but looks awesome
freekazoid05 10 months ago
DMR?
rjc0234 10 months ago
wow how the hell is it that small yet fireing a 7.62. I I can say is that these guys are making the most badass guns to date.
mattman91c 10 months ago
shit recoil looks like a bitch
williamED15 10 months ago
Needs moar .308 though :/
peepeevagi 11 months ago
Better than the F2000. And cheaper. I'd buy it :D
peepeevagi 11 months ago
Foreward ejection has been used by automatic naval guns (Mk 42 and 45), as well as the M-242 Bushmaster. But I wonder if the path may be a bit long, but that's me.
MadMichigander1313 11 months ago
Why can't they make a bullpup in 6.8 SPC? Now thats something I would buy. Maybe even 7.62x39.
AndyHanturd 11 months ago
@AndyHanturd:
Check the Microtech Small Arms Research (MSAR) STG-556-E4. The rifle is an AUG Clone that can fire 5.56mm (.223 REM), 7.62 x 39mm, 5.45x39mm, and 6.8 STC.
MadMichigander1313 11 months ago
@MadMichigander1313
haha thanks for your suggestion, right after I watched this video I looked it up and found it, apparently they use the C-products magazines and have the same issues as magazines with the 7.62x39 AR. The 6.8 doesn't look to unattractive though.
I want the 6.8 to become more cost friendly, hopefully it get adopted by the U.S. military, then it will become dirt cheap. Then I will for sure buy one. Can't hunt anything in my state with .223 other than predators.
AndyHanturd 11 months ago
@AndyHanturd i believe they make a bullpup style ak47
RYANSCHLESINGER 10 months ago
I thought the idea behind bull-pup designs was that they reduce recoil. This bull-pup seems to be pushing this guy around pretty good!
ArcMasterArc 11 months ago
@ArcMasterArc Bull-pup designs are more about being compact. And it fires the 7.62 Nato, alot more recoil than the .223/5.56
JayHawker751 11 months ago
Lots of recoil, front discharge of the shells looks like it could be a problem..
KneedlezKane 11 months ago
@KneedlezKane
Theres lots of recoil because its a .308. Granted its still not that big of a caliber but its still alot more recoil then a .223.
theredsoldier 11 months ago
the battle rifle of the future... wooooow :D
SunshineBayou10mm 1 year ago
@SunshineBayou10mm It might be an interesting design, but the front ejection idea doesn't seem very reliable. Conventional rifle designs still have far more advantages than any bullpup design.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW Its 26 inches long! and in 7.62x51, i dont think the ejection will have problems..
SunshineBayou10mm 1 year ago
@SunshineBayou10mm The front ejection system I mean.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW How is the front ejection NOT reliable , It looks as reliable as the side ejection if not i bet its more...
SunshineBayou10mm 1 year ago
@SunshineBayou10mm What happens if the ejection port is blocked with debris? Besides, the forward ejection system just adds to the complexity of the gun, increasing maintenance and decreasing reliability. The person shot maybe 20 rounds in a clean environment. What happens when you fire thousands on the battlefield with little chance to clean the rifle?
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW who cares its cool
XvChriisvX 11 months ago
@1JesseW it happens to be more reliable than the M-16 mainly because the m-16 jams in controlled environments. the ejection tube is actually made of metal that retracts ammunition thus forcing it out with the help of the pressure and the recoil. but this gun most likely will need a .223 remington/ .556 Nato compatible barrel rather than the 7.62 (recoil).
joejohnathan1 9 months ago
Comment removed
1JesseW 9 months ago
@joejohnathan1 Perhaps your right. However, I think Keltec developed the rifle in 7.62 and not 5.56 because they want to appeal to the military market and not the civilian market. The US Army already turned down so many 5.56 designs.
1JesseW 9 months ago
Are you kidding? There's always a 'need' for full-auto ;D. Even in .50BMG. But I guess if it's against a few guys...or a deer, maybe not.
tiffyj85 1 year ago
@tiffyj85 Full auto is mostly for poorly trained troops, that's why burst fire is more logical as it is a balance between volume and accuracy. Volume is fine, but accuracy is final.
1JesseW 1 year ago
how much will one of these run ya?
demmo1 1 year ago
WTF?! Kel-Tec out of nowhere with some beast ass weaponry.lol I want one of these RIGHT NOW.
bigstabby 1 year ago
Comment removed
bigstabby 1 year ago
I wonder how his right shoulder felt after all that. The recoil looks unmanageable if in full auto.
tiffyj85 1 year ago
@tiffyj85 It's .308, there would be no need for full auto
YouDiddntSeeAnything 1 year ago
@YouDiddntSeeAnything Good call, plus, that recoil was pretty intense as it is.
selgemm 1 year ago
I'm happy to see that we're going back to real calibers here in America. :) I loved the M16, don't get me wrong, but I think we need to start using the old NATO 7.62s again. I'd love to see the RFB as a new service rifle.
kevinsupra90 1 year ago
@kevinsupra90 It seems that the 6.8 SPC and the 6.5 Grendel is a better replacement for the 5.56 than the 7.62 NATO.
1JesseW 1 year ago 2
That guns is sick and I want one!
Outdoorsmen44 1 year ago
thats a very practical solution, many soliders and police officer woul love to have the big punch and range of a 7.62x51 rifle in an small package
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@curseofa5r5a A 7.62 NATO rifle would never be used by police officers since it has too much penetration and could kill innocent bystanders, that's why police use SMGs and pistols.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW yeah agree but it could be usefull as a small frame short range sniper rifle for urban encounters.
curseofa5r5a 1 year ago
@1JesseW I'm from Idaho and the police here have M1A's and AR15's. Not all police use SMG's. We have alot of open space here so .308 is fine.
YouDiddntSeeAnything 1 year ago
@YouDiddntSeeAnything Perhaps in Idaho, but maybe not in New York or Los Angeles.
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW In Los Anegeles and Ney York they use 5.56x45mm AR15's
YouDiddntSeeAnything 1 year ago
@YouDiddntSeeAnything Then what's with the talk about over penetration with the 5.56 NATO or 7.62 NATO I hear on firearms forums?
1JesseW 1 year ago
@1JesseW It can over penetrate, in some cases, as do many other rounds, for example : 9mm is notorious for over penetrating it's target, this can be solved by using hollow points. 5.56 is the samem hollow points prevent over penetration. 7.62NATO doesn't really have a problem with over penetration as much as 5.56.
YouDiddntSeeAnything 1 year ago
Would love to see the whole round emptied in full auto mode
casemods 1 year ago
I love when he pulls the bolt back at 1:17 eight million empty shells fly out hahah
PrivateSnowballTFC 1 year ago 40
@PrivateSnowballTFC Best part of the video, man.
Skidracer21 1 year ago
@PrivateSnowballTFC Dang, Thats what I want a rifle that holds eight million shells.For under 500 bucs ,lol.
zeno57 11 months ago
@PrivateSnowballTFC hahah I would've never noticed, but now I'm laughing and playing it over and over!
moultrup 10 months ago
perfect gun for zombies ;}
84singularity 1 year ago 31
@84singularity EXACTLY what I was thinking...especially since they only run for 2 grand
PrivateSnowballTFC 1 year ago
@84singularity Apparently you haven't seen the new KSG, also by Kel-Tec. A dual tube fed 12 gauge with a 14+1 capacity.
zachj589 1 year ago
@zachj589 yeah i haven't seen it.. cool shotgun which will burst heads of zombies as bubbles =)
84singularity 1 year ago
Comment removed
BlueSpud711 9 months ago
@84singularity an even better zombie gun is the new shotgun kel-tec is releasing. go to their website and it'll be on the front page =D
BlueSpud711 9 months ago
@BlueSpud711 i know dude it's Kel-Tec KSG shotgun I had comment before ... pretty nice for the zombies heads -_^
84singularity 9 months ago
@84singularity oh ok! i thought you were responding to the rfb. both are awesome guns though!! i plan on getting both
BlueSpud711 9 months ago
Im thinking about getting one of these, but im really worried about jamming. it seems like if brass jams then the gun is going to need to be sent back to the factory. Anyone got any incite about this?
scaryalbino1987 1 year ago
@scaryalbino1987
why would it jam?
ms3bani 1 year ago
@ms3bani Just like any firearm, but in this case if a round chimneys, or misfeeds or does not cycle properly it seems like it would be very hard to fix.
scaryalbino1987 1 year ago
@scaryalbino1987
foward ejection port hasnt been a problem for the FN F2000 (in production 10 years now), no idea why it would suddenly be a problem with this one.
ms3bani 1 year ago
@ms3bani Thanks man, i wasn't too worried about it but for $1800 better to be sure.
scaryalbino1987 1 year ago
@ms3bani maybe it's because it's a bigger round or he maybe be using certain rounds like Wolf ammo (they have steel casings) and kel-tec guns usually have huge problems with Steel-casing ammunition so...yeah
Umimugo 1 year ago
@Umimugo
snowflakesinhell(dot)com/2009/05/28/an-interview-with-matt-at-kel-tec-on-the-rfb/
go there and read about jams.
ms3bani 1 year ago
@scaryalbino1987 From what I've read, people don't seem to be having and problems with that. If you think about it, unless a perfect sized pebble fell into the whole with force, nothing could jam it. The recoil of every round would shake any dirt through.
zachj589 1 year ago
15 people don't appreciate firearms
JoeyTHEArms 1 year ago