If you add NaOH, it will react with the H+ ions via a neutralization reaction. Neutralization reactions are exothermic. Wouldn't the heat produced from this reaction affect "k?"
the result in green writing in ur board, at the end: why did you divide that by 4 at the left side first and then on the right side as well....i dnt get that!...bt i do get the rest.
@KatsAndBees Interesting...you attempted to expose a person for fraud by explaining a different operation of hers. You, madam or sir, are addressing the first computation of the "m" exponent, in which she in fact did not divide anything (per se, to achieve the final answer); but pyr666 was addressing the second computation, in which she DOES in fact divide to isolate the "n" variable. I simply think it is interesting as to how the dispute you propose has been created. Oh what fun, this!
@Bernadettefull You should be looking up some English videos, not Chemistry. If you don't know how to divide two numbers, just give up now. Education GAP
YOUR AWESOME!!!!!!!
rfinnigizzle 6 days ago
@rfinnigizzle "you're"
3driven3 18 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
What would you do if they don't give you the rate but the time instead?
smileyghech 2 weeks ago
If you add NaOH, it will react with the H+ ions via a neutralization reaction. Neutralization reactions are exothermic. Wouldn't the heat produced from this reaction affect "k?"
Kemster007 1 month ago
Great job :)
Boatright474 3 months ago
your hot!
leemonastesse84 4 months ago
the result in green writing in ur board, at the end: why did you divide that by 4 at the left side first and then on the right side as well....i dnt get that!...bt i do get the rest.
misspakizz 5 months ago
@misspakizz
she had 4x2^n=8
(^ is the "raised to the power of" symbol on a keyboard)
she wanted to get rid of the 4 so she divided both sides by 4, leaving 2^n=2.
it was to isolate the ^n term as much as she needed.
pyr666 4 months ago
@pyr666 wrong she did not divide anything.
4^m=16
16 can be written as 4^2 so..
4^m = 4^2
since the bases are the same the exponenets are equal to eachother therefore m=2.
the bases(in this case, 4) have to be the same tho for this to work, no division is involved
KatsAndBees 4 months ago
@KatsAndBees Interesting...you attempted to expose a person for fraud by explaining a different operation of hers. You, madam or sir, are addressing the first computation of the "m" exponent, in which she in fact did not divide anything (per se, to achieve the final answer); but pyr666 was addressing the second computation, in which she DOES in fact divide to isolate the "n" variable. I simply think it is interesting as to how the dispute you propose has been created. Oh what fun, this!
DonenDone10101 2 weeks ago
thanx!! super helpful ^_^
mio68df 5 months ago
what if I don't even have 2 different concentrations, they just give me two experiments of A. can I do this same process?
Palmar3s 11 months ago
Excellent lesson and pace! Thank you!
liaayla 1 year ago
Comment removed
sammassa 1 year ago
You didn't explain what you were calculated and how or why the number 16 was derived. GAP
Bernadettefull 1 year ago
@Bernadettefull She was calculating 4.0x10^-2/2.5x10^-13, which equaled 16.
ejenkins132 1 year ago
@Bernadettefull You should be looking up some English videos, not Chemistry. If you don't know how to divide two numbers, just give up now. Education GAP
JittersInternational 9 months ago