Added: 4 years ago
From: jherring8202
Views: 331,343
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (783)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 3:53 ant nukes lol

  • free wargasm for her!

  • back in the day, you can pick up a Thompson for 75 dollars in a police catalog.

  • As nostalgic as the tommy gun is, nothign beats that satisfying thump of the BAR

  • btw i love the tomygun!

  • is that Rambo´s wife?

  • He said "clip magazine" 2:13

  • thischick kicks ass and she looks soo funny/ awesome holding the bar

  • Nice video of some cool weapons! Thanks for up-loading it. Helps me with my research about the true sounds of machineguns, not the Hollywood "dubbed" sounds. I appreciate that!

  • some BAR's had an adjustable rate of fire by turning a gas regulator up or down.

  • I suggest getting off of Call of Duty, going to Wikipedia or some other source for gun knowledge, and study guns. They're very interesting to learn about. I'm sure that knowledge can save your life some day, or save yourself from losing any pointless arguments/debates.

  • The BAR Model M1918 has two selective modes: slow fire and fast fire.

  • @SwaffyX why would you pick the slow?

  • @MrStrontipis Because its more controllabe Einstein

  • @kalashnikov200 then why don't all guns have that option, or just fire slow in the first place

  • @MrStrontipis Because Einstein guns are all designed differently and for different purposes, take for instance the m16. It has to have a high rate of fire to supress the enemy and put out alot of lead on the battlefield, more controllable shots however, you have the opton of selecting single fire and since the m16 uses the puny 5.56 in comparison to the BARs massive .30-06, a slow rate of fire is not needed as the weapon is very controllable anyway

  • @MrStrontipis And if you look at the design of the BAR, the mechanism that allows this slower rate of fire is housed in the buttstock. To answer your question, lets take the m16 again as an example. The m16 houses the buffer or recoil spring there so it would be impossible to install the same firing rate controll system as browning did and furthermore it would be unnecessary.

  • @MrStrontipis Also if you havent noticed, the BAR only carries 20 rounds in the mag with an additional one in the chamber so when using it as a squad support weapon i.e a machine gun on a high rate of fire its gonna spit out alot of lead and with that recoil you aint gonna hit jack shit on full auto so slowing it down can help. This would be unnecesary if it was belt fed as you have enough lead to cover a wider target area and you can afford to miss. A perfect example being the mg42 1200 rpm

  • @MrStrontipis It would be fucking stupid to have a slow machine gun now wouldnt it?

  • @MrStrontipis Any more questions Einstein?

  • @MrStrontipis I'd choose it for a couple of reasons:

    - Reserve ammo, especially since it has a 20 round mag instead of 30-50.

    - Probably less recoil, resulting in better accuracy.

  • how come the firerate is so low?

  • Comment removed

  • Need the Drum

  • it dont seem that expensive to shoot all you do is just reload the bullets yourself

  • i love both and they are very useful in nazi zombies lol cod 5 FTW!!!

  • @kirk0respite Could't disagree. They were both cheap, put-your-life-on weapons in zombies. They killed and made a you a fair amount of cash. Good times.

  • bar was an automatic rifle that was chambered for 30-06 and fired at a rate of 300-650 rounds a minute

  • thompsons werenot machineguns... they was submachineguns that fired .45 caliber pistol rounds at a rate of 600-1200 rounds a minute depending on the model

  • giving little people big guns is mean :(

  • yea i also read that at first the thompson was unpopular because it was pricy cops didnt want them until after the kansas state massacre which pretty boy floyd was a part of then cops got them and after the muzzle break was added the regular thompson was sold for 175 muzzle break thompsons were 200 the mags were 3 bucks per stick and 5 per drum

  • the M3A1 grease gun took about 4 dollars to make. I want one.

  • The BAR is only hard to handle because the girl that is shooting it is inexperienced with fully automatic weapons. But nice video though.

  • omg I looove that BAR sound

  • Hearing aids anyone???

  • That little chick is a bad ass!

  • pause at 0:37 giggety

  • i wannabe that gun!

  • am i the only one who thought it looked like kim was getting poopered hard around 4:48?

  • @ jonesm 16 it was actually designed shortly after ww1, and the first troops to use t were the french in ww2. they needed something that would stop the germans, and while it did its job, it did not stop the germans

  • what the hell does he mean "the artistry that went into it". there was none. it was designed in the early years of WWII to be a light weapon that could be used by both men on the ground and paratropers and it was mad to have a small but powerful round. there was no fucking "artistry" that went into it. it was made to be used, not hung in an art gallery.

  • the most famous machine gun ever built? dude, you need to get out a little.

  • @almightywitey

    Can you think of a more famous sub-machine gun?

  • @Servalion Another Famous SMG was the MP40 which was also widely used during WW2 since 9mm rounds were much easier to find than .45 cal, also the MP40 was suprisingly found during the Invasion of Afghanistan, in which several MP40s and MP44s were being used by the Taliban.

  • the thompson was created in WW1 for the triple entente(great britan, france, russia) as a weapon to keep enemies heads down during a charge, but like the BAR it never saw action until WW2, it was used in the start of the Korean war. The thompson isnt used by the U.S. military anymore, but it is used by other countries military powers

  • Comment removed

  • @fuckyoubitch5495 The BAR did see action in WW1. John Browning's son Val was one of the first to use it in the field in 1918.

  • Kim does a great job holding the rifles steady.

  • "This is neat! "  Better than her vibrator

  • I grew up calling this the "tommy gun" until i learned it's name from Medal of Honor (i was like, 9, i'm 15 now).

    Then it was the "thomp-sun", lol.

  • 30.06 makes me smile.

  • jeez, i didn't realize that the BAR was so powerful

  • the 80's called they want their acid wash jeans back

  • Clip magazine...?

    Isn't a clip and magazine completely different? Ones in a box and ones on a rail?

  • the early BAR models shoots slow,but the later ww2 models shoots fast,and are lighter,bipods are useless in ww2 since it was first designed as a trench weapon in ww1 in which soldiers in ww1 mostly prones and shoot with them,and the battlefields in ww1 are moslty open flat muddy fields with absolutely no cover except trenches,thats how bipods are most necesarry in ww1,so ww2 soldier mainly removed them and disposed them for lighter weight

  • @benhuang1000

    Shut the fuck up. The .M1918 BAR didnt have a Bipod. The M1918 A1 and A2 had bipods. The BAR WAS fast full auto and slow full auto. In korea they started making them with just semi auto and fast full auto.

  • These "professionals" violated one of the hallmark rules of shooting....have a fortified backstop. Shooting at the ground is probably not the safest thing to do. Bullets can and do ricochet off of rocks.

  • @gmccord1970

    That isn't a rule of shooting. It's be aware of your targets foreground and background. I'm pretty sure when they went to the middle of the desert, they made sure no one was around...

  • I just plainly love guns.

  • imagine u shoot and someone really far walking and u shoot him

  • keep your change you filthy animal.

  • @AdammTheDude One...two...TEN!

  • @AdammTheDude The girl reminds me of CHICKS WHO LOVE GUNS.

  • @AdammTheDude LOL awesome.

    

  • yeah the thompson has a stock for a reason you silly tart.

  • why does the guy stops talking after 3 words for 3 seconds and then starts talking again???

  • lol she shake like a washing machine when she shoot:)))

  • I agree that it's kinda lame to use "pretty" girls to fire the guns, but it does show you their relative weights - if it were some hairy-legged old man on camera for 30 seconds, you'd get no real sense of the weight of the gun. And, she does a pretty good job for being such a tiny little thing! She doesn't drop it, or let the barrel fly up too high!

  • Nyle Leatham talks like a fucking retard

  • Nope, you're wrong. They were killed with 2 -1921 Colt Thompson's serial #'s 2347 and 7580, and 1 sawed off shotguns.

    Look it up.

  • the st valentines day massacre, they were killed with sawn off shotguns not m1928 thompson

  • @cravendalemilk11 no. your wrong. it was proven they were hosed in .45 cal bullets. do shit shotguns shoot like that. no they dont.

  • Id bone her!

  • oh my god, the bar looks like the coolest gun to shoot.

  • Awesome gun! And one of the hottest girls i've ever seen firing it!!!

  • girls, gangsters, guns whats more to life?

  • 2 things. 1---its a chick and the people in the military are huge weighing up to 255lbs + she weighs like 119? maybe 125. and 2 the thompson is a smg of course its gunna be more accurate firing from the hip the damn BAR is the size of those tits on sticks showing the guns off. the BAR wins hands down with power.accuracy, and reliability.

  • The Polish copyed the Bar it whas call Browning wz.29 but i wasnt as good

  • shes havin fun!!

  • "This is neat!" hahaha whatevs!

  • these should be legal to own in full auto...i can probly pull the trigger faster than full auto with that hahaha

  • Comment removed

  • I hate when ppl call SMGs "machine-guns." Theres a difference!

  • They should still be using the B.A.R, M1928 Thompson,and The M1 garand. The finest weapons ever made.

  • why in the hell did they retire it

  • You don't bhave to go back in time when Thompsons were sold for $30. !

    $15,000 is now what $30 used to be in the 1920's'

  • I wish I can go Back in Time when Thompsons were being sold for $30.

  • @EvilFingers originally they were $200 and yeah me 2

    haha

  • @EvilFingers Original cost was over 200 dollars. Mass production of the simplified M1A1 WWII version brought this down to about 70. That was a much simplified iteration without the Blish block locking and with a parkerized finish and simplified peep sight. Not the beautiful blueing, high polish, fine walnut, and sophisticated Lyman adjustable aperture sight of the fabulous 1928 Thompson. The M1A1 could only take the box mag, which were easier to manufacture than the 50 round drums.

  • @EvilFingers me too i payd like 300 euros for a 1928 model whit 1 clip mag 20 rounds

  • @EvilFingers

    oh hell yeah

  • @EvilFingers but the mediocre wages was $100 so it wasn't that cheap to them :D

  • @nepitolk0

    Well of course the pay back then wasnt much compared to now, but at least you can get and own your Thompson.....its all just the matter of saving up.

  • @EvilFingers I cannot agree more.

  • @EvilFingers and machetes were available to 15 yo at the surplus store

  • @THExMATI2IX

    Mmmmkay!

  • @EvilFingers in the 60's

  • @EvilFingers I cant agree with you more dude and the thompson is like my fave gun of all time! No gun is better than any other gun for my opinion and ive always wanted the god father virsion OMG SO AWESOME

  • @EvilFingers oops pressed the dislike button sorry dude here (I LOVE THIS COMMENT)

  • @modernwarfarerer1100

    No biggie, mistakes happens.

  • @EvilFingers aha thx subscribe please i need more!

  • @EvilFingers

    haha Yea I Know!

  • @EvilFingers and were sent to your house without a background check lol :P

  • @CptCrunch0978 Dont we all wish is what that simple now LOL!

  • @EvilFingers due when they first came out they were 200 bucks, a car was 400 they were never cheap

  • @TJkillsall Have you seen the History Channel's Tales of the Gun: Tommy Guns, it was stated in the program that the Tommy Gun was marked $30, only because the US Military and several Police Depts. did not want it...which is why during the Prohibition Years, Gangsters were buying them in the 100s.

  • @EvilFingers you can still buy it for 30. 30,000 that is

  • @TheMadnesscombatfan Thats how much I bought my 01 GMC Sonoma brand new.

  • @EvilFingers just think a lot of origional thompson owners sold it in the 40s for 50 bucks and now their 60 grand

  • @EvilFingers but $30 was alot of money in the 1920

  • @yoman1200able Compared to now, $30 is a Steal!

  • 0:33 dude its not 'gangster' its 'gansta'!

  • public enemies o yeahhhhhhhn

  • i have to say the BAR with it's ROF, sights, and overall look reminds me of an early m60 also i like the kar thompson better because of it not having a stock

  • "Longer bursts! Longer!" :D

  • the reason its hard to "manage" is because she is a 120 pound woman

    anyone else see a problem here

    i actual own one of these by ohio ordinace its not that bad

  • I personally think that a slow rate of fire on some support guns with high cal rounds is a good thing, if you could get 10 acurate rounds on a target in 5 - 10 seconds that is far better than firing 50 or 60 ad get the same results...

  • lol badass girl, eh?

  • Nice seeing her head bob up and down. I support women with heavy guns.

  • I bought the semi auto version in 1986. I love it.

  • Damn, I could have some fun with that BAR

  • that b.a.r. is awesome but that girl couldn't hit the side of a barn with it, so just give it to me i'll show you how to hit something.

  • I hate when they show women fireing guns

  • BAR shoots a 30.06 bullet and kicks like a mother.Thompson shoots a .45 cal less of a kick.

  • Lol at the female with the stupid 80's haircut.

  • @diramonsky it dosent take a rocket scientist to figure out this video was probably shot in the 80s . just saying

  • @Proedge352

    Then lol at all the people in the 80's with rediculous haircuts! Good enough?

  • @diramonsky nope. the 80s kicked ass , cars , music , state of the economy . night and day difference from then till know

  • @Proedge352 Yeah, the 80's are like a whole other world compared to hell that is today. Girls were appealing then, now they just induce nausea.

  • @mzwere1 well said.

  • hoty

  • wtf??

    Women + Machine Guns= winning combination!!

    O hey, theres this feature on you tube that lets you watch OTHER videos

    its right over there>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    sexist bastards

  • I'm back again!!!! Still TenStarsplus!!! I was just wondering why our armed forces aren't using BARs in the middle east that would show terrorist snipers we mean business!!!!! Empty a clip into the area the sniper is shooting from at a range of a mile or more and they would know what .30-06 means!!!! Oh yes I still think Kim is smokin HOT!!!!!!!

  • Such a waste of ammo. She's firing randomly into the dirt.  No target.

  • I can`t watch it more when you hipfire with a BAR or an Thompson, It make me sad :/

  • try your luck standing 5 minutes and shooting BAR :O you must be schwarzenegger or some shit like this when you can do that

  • At first the BAR was designed to be fired from the hip..They used to have a device that looks like a canteen cup...You wear it on your belt ,on your hip and place the butt of the BAR inside.

    But you right it would be a bitch shooting it for a long time without that hip holder..

  • Im always use BAR in cod5

  • another cod fanboy?

  • hell yeah

  • Thompsons my last name >:D

  • why do they always have some ditzy bitch shooting awesome guns when they should have some one like Gunny shooting 'em

  • @MagnaSlash101

    Because Gunny isnt always available and didnt he do a segment on the Thompson in his Mail Call Show?

  • 2 Thinks i always hate.

    1) People just shooting automatics at nothing... at least put up targets.

    2) Using women to show off guns, especially when they just shot from the hip. If your going to display such amazing guns give it to someone who knows how to use it be it man or woman. Not some girl with tits and pink fingernails.

  • @LcplMartin1986 Things I hate:

    1) You

    2) You

    3) You

  • yea because having some ditz with her fingers all painted up shoot at nothing is such an amazing display of what a weapon can do!!! YEA!!!!! GO die in a fire.

  • @LcplMartin1986 HEY

    get ur facts straight, they are orange fingernails

    haha, but i totally agree

  • @LcplMartin1986 lmao. i prefer a woman with tits and pink fingernails. but its alright if ur sexually attracted to weapons.

  • @LcplMartin1986 I believe she controlled the Thompson firing from under the arm and on the shoulder as well or better than a lot of Men I know. As for the BAR I for one would not want her shooting at me from a prone position. Nobody I know can dodge .30-06 shells for long. Part of the magic of a full auto is just wasting ammo for the hell of it. An H&K MP5 almost broke me it was too much fun. Also too many full auto matches too close to home. I love to see women that like to shoot.

  • @LcplMartin1986 TITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @LcplMartin1986

    1) I'm not too worried about her shooting at the ground.

    2) Or her being a woman since I know plenty of MP's that can out shoot infantry. I will agree with you that

    3) she can't handle machine guns. Firing from the hip is fine but it looks like the recoil's too much even bipod supported.

  • @LcplMartin1986  another thing i hate. putting all your sound on one pan so you get a very sore left ear

  • @LcplMartin1986 yup if want to see hot girls there´s something called porn. if i want to see guns, i want to see them being used as they should.

  • @LcplMartin1986 i agree, however the effect of the sand spraying in the air is pretty cool

  • @LcplMartin1986 This girl had no tits nor pink fingernails. What does shooting at targets change? Two things I hate is people not being able to type properly and making constant typos.

  • @CustomWeapons 1:04 pink finger nails, and shooting at a target shows weapon effectiveness and is much more interesting. But hey that's OK! Why care about the weapon being fired when the center point could just be the woman holding it right! fuck off.

  • @LcplMartin1986 It doesn't show weapon effectiveness is the shooter can't hit a target 20 feet away. It's showing the recoil, and when it looks like little recoil while a woman shoots, it proves how low the recoil is.

  • @CustomWeapons Right because showing a full auto rifle shot from the hip is MUCH more effective at show recoil then firing from the shoulder and putting 30 rounds on target? You sir are ridiculous, but that's ok! Go back to building your imaginary "custom" Weapons.....

  • @LcplMartin1986 I never said firing a gun from hip shows it having effective accuracy. I said effectiveness means nothing if the shooter can't accurately fire a gun, and the video is simply them firing at the hip to show recoil. Perhaps if you quit being a keyboard warrior long enough to read what I'm typing you'd understand that the first time.

  • @CustomWeapons Wow now your saying i need to read before I post and yet I said shooting from the shoulder would show recoil management better. Who gives a flying fuck how recoil is from the hip since in reality any firing will be done from the shoulder. Jesus go back to playing MW and making your "kustom kool guns!"

  • @LcplMartin1986 You do need to read before you post because you're making me explain myself twice. If you fire from the hip and there's low recoil, there will be even less recoil firing from the shoulder. Why didn't you put "kustom kool guns!" even though I'm typing in better English than you are?

  • @LcplMartin1986 I don't know what's more stupid, your comments about women and firearms, or that 71 lunkheads like you gave it a thumbs up. Must be a bunch of NPGMF'ers

  • @LcplMartin1986 she don't have very good tits in the first place...nore an ass for that matter.

  • @LcplMartin1986 youre so fucking right imean wow shes just shooting from the hip which is dangerous and could hurt you and shes shooting at nothing AT LEAST PUT UP A FUCKIN TARGET god imean if youre showing such an amazing gun have some respect!

  • that guy ghas a tallk issue!

  • An addendum to my earlier comment to wit you forgot to mention George(machinegun) Kelly and the nickname of The Chicago Piano for the Tommygun!!!!! TenStarsplus !!!!

  • This is one fantabulous video !!!!! The Thompson smg was chambered in .45acp and the BAR was chambered in 30-06 SPF and that is where the noticible difference in recoil shows up!!! TenStarsplus !!!!! I always wanted to see a comparison of the two weapons!!! By the way Kim is as hot as the barrell on that BAR after it's fired 10 clips!!!!!

  • kim looks frumpy for this generation

  • i fucking love theres gun's!!!!

  • watch her face wen she shoots the bar wen she is lying down

  • 3:40 hahahaha!

  • @kirk0respite

    Thats Wonder Woman LOL!

  • whahaha lol

  • these is nothing more sexy than a girl shooting a machine gun

  • OMG, I think I'm in love!!!

  • kim is hot

  • I heard Bonnie and Clyde had a sawed off version. Wonder what that looked like and how the accuracy was.

  • I thought Clyde used a BAR.

  • look at that girl firing the BAR. LOL she's like head banging on a rock n roll concert..

    "here's a real gun for you to try."

    (almost drop the gun) "you've got to be kidding."

  • he for got to say al capon