There is single instances of fight from those great Acharyas.Even,some times Jains and Budhhists tried to harm Hindus.
Acharyas like Kumarila Bhatta in the time Adi Shankaracharya defeated Buddhists by sheer knowledge which accompany intellectual discourse before educated judges even for months.Defeated would accept and leave the place.
Do you know anything on Hindu philosophy and history!
@gujjuhindu, you say what you say with conviction, but you are wrong. One day, Britain WILL be an all-white society and folks like you will be deported.
Because you people are just different from us. You brownies have a habit for ASKING for tips, in hotels, in restaurants. Tips are meant to be given by the guest or patron as a mark of appreciation for services rendered. The server shouldn't DEMAND a tip from the guest or patron, but that subtlety is somehow lost on you hairy brown apes.
@jamessmedley82 really....seriously? You want to wipe out the black race from Britan because somebody asked you for a tip? Anyways...what do you think will happen when colored people leave the country? You think everything will become alright? everybody will be happy. no more corruption. no more crime? if you seriously do...then I can't help by laugh at you.
@gujjuhindu , no, not everything will be alright if the Coloureds leave my country. My country is fucked up enough as it is. The French have taken over the City of London (the "City" refers to the financial district within London), the Poles have taken over our housebuilding trade, and fu**ing German students are taking over our universities. Even if blacks and browns leave my country, there'll still be undesirables here -- plenty of them.
@jamessmedley82 first of all...it's not "your" country...you didn't buy Britain. you were just lucky enough to be born in it. anyways...do you think you would've been a different person if you were lets say born a black person+ brought up in the UK. do you think you'd be more violent, less intelligent, more of an "undesirable"?
and you think 60% of the population is "undesirable"...it's ALWAYS going to be like that. so you might as well get used to it, good friend.
Brutality of Hindu against Jain /Buddhist extermination
South India was the repository of Hinduism after Muslim onslaught in North India:)"With the Hindu Renaissance, Jainism in South India went into retreat. There may have been a terrible persecution of Jains in the eighth century. Hindu temples in Tamil Nadu show the impaling of eight thousand Jains at Madurai. In Karnataka Jains were slaughtered by the Virashaiva movement which started in the twelfth century, but Jains had important pos
Shankara was an evangelist, converting Jains and Buddhists. As to the argument that Jains and Buddhists were not much different from Hindus, I cited instances where such conversion was accompanied by violence.
Buddha and Muhammad were founders of religion(s) and as such I would not consider them evangelists. Forced conversion is forced conversion, not evangelism in my book. In the case of Buddha, I don't think he particularly cared to start a moveme
Anonjoj, you say that fascist britain RULED india for 300 years !!
The reality is that fascist britain LOOTED india for 300 years and killed more than 20 million people in our motherland.
Before the arrival of fascist britain, India used to be the richest country of the world. These dirty smelly and arse licker british fascists and thieves looted us and took all our money to their prostitute queen victoria, who was a born prostitute.
All us indians know how we fell (really pissed off). I suggest instead of just being keyboard warrioirs, some indians, (maybe if ure reading this) should start some kind of movement, to try and change india, and destroy the sorry and shitty excuse for a parliament we have. Just saying, its about fukking time we did something.
India later very poor. British bought the dowry system to women and after Queen Jhansi lost the war Lord Cornwallis imposed new law that no princess & women could rule.but now these stereotypes don't happen anymore except some rural areas.
RACIST, IMPERIALISTIC RASCAL THOMAS MCCAULEY WAS SIMPLY AMAZED AT THE GLORIOUS, RICH NATIVE VEDIC CULTURE. HE MADE A WICKED PLAN TO DESTROY THE VIBRANT CULTURE FROM THE ROOT. HERE'S WHAT THIS SHAMELESS, EVIL MAN SAID in THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT in 1835:
' I propose that we replace her old & ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign & English is good & greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture & they will become what we want them a truly dominated nation.' - T Macauley
THIS INCLUDED REDUCING THE GLORIOUS HAINDAVA FAITH TO MERE "MYTH" SO THAT THEY COULD SPREAD THEIR MEANINGLESS NARROW XTIAN DOGMA.
THOSE BRITS WHO RULED HINDUSTAN ARE NOT EVEN WORTH SPITTING ON.
the British actively sought to demoralise Hindus, and anti Hindu laws were brought about in a attempt to keep us down and feel like 2nd class citizens.
Lord Randolph Churchill and Winston S. Churchill felt that India was neglected in it's development and their people abused. (Churchill fought the Muslims in the North.)
We had and now have enemies within our own people of Britain as you did and also do today in India. The political power structure of the time in India actually helped those British who were intent on looting your country.
If I were voting in either country, it would be BNP in England and BJP in India.
Nice bit of propaganda there mate. Whilst i do not seek to defend the British empire i think u do need to be a bit more balanced on these things.
British influence has had a major positive role on India, it is the largest democracy in the world, when u compare that to for example China next door thats a pretty important thing.
It just wasnt all negative as u try to make out. Technology, trade, science, rule of law, democratic practices, all these things were shared because of Empire
but when it comes to trade- the british took over everything. they closed up all the routes and made india POORER. so its not like india prospered under the british.
science- the indians were and still are some of the smartest people in the world. if anything happened there- the indians taught the british science.
rule of law- what kind of law? the british taxed the indians high amounts and unfairly arrested ppl and sentthem t jail. this is rule of law?
Some of the points are more important than others, but the fact you agree with the technology point shows it was not all bad.
On trade, we did not just take everything, Infrastructure was created within India, that generates wealth and makes trade easier. The empire opened up markets
Indian people suffered under British rule i fully accept that, and there can be no justification to excuse such practices, but it has helped shape india into the nation it is today. And thats a free democratic 1
Not all the British were in India for destructive reasons, but that was the prevailing politics of it since all were subject to the Crown. The British also had help from some of the Indian officials who wanted power over the welfare of their own people.
A few of the Brits disgusted with Christianity (like myself ) actually had good intentions and fought the Muslims.
And despite the past, Englishmen like myself see India as a beacon of freedom in an ever more tyrannical world.
Yes they looted us , but they also gave us democracy and law system , but its useless for india, coz no one give a Fcuk to laws anymore. Tell me how many politicians follow these laws , no one, all these Hairless ball headed politician should be hanged , if we want any change in india.
They looted, plundered Hindustan like nobody's business!!!!! The so called "infrastructure" that the Brits created was to suit their own purpose - to better loot the Indians!!!!!! Fact is they had NO intentions of ever leaving OUR beautiful HINDUSTAN - thank goodness, they WERE KICKED OUT!!!! GOOD RIDDANCE TO BAD RUBBISH!!!!!! JAY HIND!
Our prevailing politics of the time kept us subjects of the Crown and compliant to the wishes of the monarchy.
We had enemies within our own people as we still do today. Like us, the Indians also had and have now enemies within their own people. This fact is not altogether lost on a lot of us both.
On the whole of it though, history will not be kind to us, yet we did manage to save them from subjugation by a Japanese invasion and spared no effort to do so at a cost of many lives.
RACIST, IMPERIALISTIC RASCAL THOMAS MCCAULEY WAS SIMPLY AMAZED AT THE GLORIOUS, RICH NATIVE VEDIC CULTURE. HE MADE A WICKED PLAN TO DESTROY THE VIBRANT CULTURE FROM THE ROOT. HERE'S WHAT THIS SHAMELESS, EVIL MAN SAID in THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT in 1835:
' I propose that we replace her old & ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign & English is good & greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture & they will become what we want them a truly dominated nation.' - T Macauley
THIS INCLUDED REDUCING THE GLORIOUS HAINDAVA FAITH TO MERE "MYTH" SO THAT THEY COULD SPREAD THEIR MEANINGLESS NARROW XTIAN DOGMA.
THOSE BRITS WHO RULED HINDUSTAN ARE NOT EVEN WORTH SPITTING ON.
There is single instances of fight from those great Acharyas.Even,some times Jains and Budhhists tried to harm Hindus.
Acharyas like Kumarila Bhatta in the time Adi Shankaracharya defeated Buddhists by sheer knowledge which accompany intellectual discourse before educated judges even for months.Defeated would accept and leave the place.
Do you know anything on Hindu philosophy and history!
Moron!
Saraswathiputra 2 years ago
Is it?Can you give those details with proper references.
About your founder Mohammed horrible atrocities could I write here.
If I go in depth,then it is bitting for you.Dont show your camel suckers intelligence to us.
It is warning to you.
Saraswathiputra 2 years ago
Oh by the way th BNP will eventually get to power and all you hindu fucks will have to go back to India and shovel shit for the rest of your lives
ginost7 2 years ago
so to everyone who doesn't know...BNP is committed to creating an all-white Britain...basically they are like the KKK in Britain.
they recieved 0.7% of the popular vote.
no need to worry..as long as there are real human beings in the world the BNP and other organization like it will never be in power.
gujjuhindu 2 years ago
@gujjuhindu, you say what you say with conviction, but you are wrong. One day, Britain WILL be an all-white society and folks like you will be deported.
jamessmedley82 2 years ago
and what makes you think that?
the KKK in america was successful for a great deal of time but they're virtually dead to society and hated by most of the people i know.
gujjuhindu 2 years ago
Britain and America are VERY different countries. Never will a coloured person rule my country.
jamessmedley82 2 years ago
and can you tell me why you are racist? what is so bad about a colored person?
gujjuhindu 2 years ago
Because you people are just different from us. You brownies have a habit for ASKING for tips, in hotels, in restaurants. Tips are meant to be given by the guest or patron as a mark of appreciation for services rendered. The server shouldn't DEMAND a tip from the guest or patron, but that subtlety is somehow lost on you hairy brown apes.
jamessmedley82 2 years ago
@jamessmedley82 really....seriously? You want to wipe out the black race from Britan because somebody asked you for a tip? Anyways...what do you think will happen when colored people leave the country? You think everything will become alright? everybody will be happy. no more corruption. no more crime? if you seriously do...then I can't help by laugh at you.
gujjuhindu 1 year ago
@gujjuhindu , no, not everything will be alright if the Coloureds leave my country. My country is fucked up enough as it is. The French have taken over the City of London (the "City" refers to the financial district within London), the Poles have taken over our housebuilding trade, and fu**ing German students are taking over our universities. Even if blacks and browns leave my country, there'll still be undesirables here -- plenty of them.
jamessmedley82 1 year ago
@jamessmedley82 first of all...it's not "your" country...you didn't buy Britain. you were just lucky enough to be born in it. anyways...do you think you would've been a different person if you were lets say born a black person+ brought up in the UK. do you think you'd be more violent, less intelligent, more of an "undesirable"?
and you think 60% of the population is "undesirable"...it's ALWAYS going to be like that. so you might as well get used to it, good friend.
gujjuhindu 1 year ago
Brutality of Hindu against Jain /Buddhist extermination
South India was the repository of Hinduism after Muslim onslaught in North India:)"With the Hindu Renaissance, Jainism in South India went into retreat. There may have been a terrible persecution of Jains in the eighth century. Hindu temples in Tamil Nadu show the impaling of eight thousand Jains at Madurai. In Karnataka Jains were slaughtered by the Virashaiva movement which started in the twelfth century, but Jains had important pos
BadKhank 2 years ago
All you hindu pricks need a good kick up the arse. If you had a half a brain you would convert to christianity right now.
ginost7 2 years ago
i want to tell everybody that in fascist London we call the bangladeshis as, Bangi.
(Fascist London is the city of nazis and fascists and more than 99% english are born fascists)
we hate the bangis and their bangladesh = jangla-desh.
bangladesh is jangla-desh and all bangladeshis are Bangi.
BangiBangla 2 years ago
Shankara was an evangelist, converting Jains and Buddhists. As to the argument that Jains and Buddhists were not much different from Hindus, I cited instances where such conversion was accompanied by violence.
Buddha and Muhammad were founders of religion(s) and as such I would not consider them evangelists. Forced conversion is forced conversion, not evangelism in my book. In the case of Buddha, I don't think he particularly cared to start a moveme
BadKhank 2 years ago
fascist britain looted the whole world and milled more than 60 million people in the whole world.
today,we are poor in india because of the british thieves who looted us for 300 years.
BangiBangla 2 years ago
Anonjoj, you say that fascist britain RULED india for 300 years !!
The reality is that fascist britain LOOTED india for 300 years and killed more than 20 million people in our motherland.
Before the arrival of fascist britain, India used to be the richest country of the world. These dirty smelly and arse licker british fascists and thieves looted us and took all our money to their prostitute queen victoria, who was a born prostitute.
BangiBangla 2 years ago
All us indians know how we fell (really pissed off). I suggest instead of just being keyboard warrioirs, some indians, (maybe if ure reading this) should start some kind of movement, to try and change india, and destroy the sorry and shitty excuse for a parliament we have. Just saying, its about fukking time we did something.
nevacaredless 2 years ago
Britian ruled India for 300 years.
India later very poor. British bought the dowry system to women and after Queen Jhansi lost the war Lord Cornwallis imposed new law that no princess & women could rule.but now these stereotypes don't happen anymore except some rural areas.
anonjoj 2 years ago
RACIST, IMPERIALISTIC RASCAL THOMAS MCCAULEY WAS SIMPLY AMAZED AT THE GLORIOUS, RICH NATIVE VEDIC CULTURE. HE MADE A WICKED PLAN TO DESTROY THE VIBRANT CULTURE FROM THE ROOT. HERE'S WHAT THIS SHAMELESS, EVIL MAN SAID in THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT in 1835:
EXChristian0 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
' I propose that we replace her old & ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign & English is good & greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture & they will become what we want them a truly dominated nation.' - T Macauley
THIS INCLUDED REDUCING THE GLORIOUS HAINDAVA FAITH TO MERE "MYTH" SO THAT THEY COULD SPREAD THEIR MEANINGLESS NARROW XTIAN DOGMA.
THOSE BRITS WHO RULED HINDUSTAN ARE NOT EVEN WORTH SPITTING ON.
EXChristian0 2 years ago
Ex christian
very well said. I agree with you.
fascist britain looted us for 300 years and we must demand compensation from fascist britain.
BangiBangla 2 years ago
the British actively sought to demoralise Hindus, and anti Hindu laws were brought about in a attempt to keep us down and feel like 2nd class citizens.
HinduSolja 2 years ago 4
Lord Randolph Churchill and Winston S. Churchill felt that India was neglected in it's development and their people abused. (Churchill fought the Muslims in the North.)
We had and now have enemies within our own people of Britain as you did and also do today in India. The political power structure of the time in India actually helped those British who were intent on looting your country.
If I were voting in either country, it would be BNP in England and BJP in India.
SirWinstonChurchill 2 years ago
Nice bit of propaganda there mate. Whilst i do not seek to defend the British empire i think u do need to be a bit more balanced on these things.
British influence has had a major positive role on India, it is the largest democracy in the world, when u compare that to for example China next door thats a pretty important thing.
It just wasnt all negative as u try to make out. Technology, trade, science, rule of law, democratic practices, all these things were shared because of Empire
TheBritishWatcher 2 years ago
technology i agree with...
but when it comes to trade- the british took over everything. they closed up all the routes and made india POORER. so its not like india prospered under the british.
science- the indians were and still are some of the smartest people in the world. if anything happened there- the indians taught the british science.
rule of law- what kind of law? the british taxed the indians high amounts and unfairly arrested ppl and sentthem t jail. this is rule of law?
gujjuhindu 2 years ago
Some of the points are more important than others, but the fact you agree with the technology point shows it was not all bad.
On trade, we did not just take everything, Infrastructure was created within India, that generates wealth and makes trade easier. The empire opened up markets
Indian people suffered under British rule i fully accept that, and there can be no justification to excuse such practices, but it has helped shape india into the nation it is today. And thats a free democratic 1
TheBritishWatcher 2 years ago
Comment removed
coolwaves4all 2 years ago
huh? what did they give us??????
they LOOTED US IN EVERY WAY POSSIBLE!!!!!
EXChristian0 2 years ago
Not all the British were in India for destructive reasons, but that was the prevailing politics of it since all were subject to the Crown. The British also had help from some of the Indian officials who wanted power over the welfare of their own people.
A few of the Brits disgusted with Christianity (like myself ) actually had good intentions and fought the Muslims.
And despite the past, Englishmen like myself see India as a beacon of freedom in an ever more tyrannical world.
SirWinstonChurchill 2 years ago
Yes they looted us , but they also gave us democracy and law system , but its useless for india, coz no one give a Fcuk to laws anymore. Tell me how many politicians follow these laws , no one, all these Hairless ball headed politician should be hanged , if we want any change in india.
coolwaves4all 2 years ago
"We owe a lot to the Indians, who taught us how to count, without which no worthwhile scientific discovery could have been made!" -- Albert Einstein
EXChristian0 2 years ago
They looted, plundered Hindustan like nobody's business!!!!! The so called "infrastructure" that the Brits created was to suit their own purpose - to better loot the Indians!!!!!! Fact is they had NO intentions of ever leaving OUR beautiful HINDUSTAN - thank goodness, they WERE KICKED OUT!!!! GOOD RIDDANCE TO BAD RUBBISH!!!!!! JAY HIND!
EXChristian0 2 years ago
Our prevailing politics of the time kept us subjects of the Crown and compliant to the wishes of the monarchy.
We had enemies within our own people as we still do today. Like us, the Indians also had and have now enemies within their own people. This fact is not altogether lost on a lot of us both.
On the whole of it though, history will not be kind to us, yet we did manage to save them from subjugation by a Japanese invasion and spared no effort to do so at a cost of many lives.
SirWinstonChurchill 2 years ago
TECHNOLOGY? WHAT TECHNOLOGY?
1. IF THEY DIDN'T LEARN HOW TO COUNT FROM THE INDIANS, THERE WOULD BE NO TECHNOLOGY TO SPEAK OF!!!!!
2. EVERYTHING THE BRITS DID IN BHARATVARSH WERE FOR THEIR OWN SELFISH REASONS.
I DO AGREE THEY WERE EXPERTS AT LOOTING WEALTH and EXACTING IMPERIALISM!!!!!
EXChristian0 2 years ago
lol
TheBritishWatcher 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RACIST, IMPERIALISTIC RASCAL THOMAS MCCAULEY WAS SIMPLY AMAZED AT THE GLORIOUS, RICH NATIVE VEDIC CULTURE. HE MADE A WICKED PLAN TO DESTROY THE VIBRANT CULTURE FROM THE ROOT. HERE'S WHAT THIS SHAMELESS, EVIL MAN SAID in THE BRITISH PARLIAMENT in 1835:
EXChristian0 2 years ago
' I propose that we replace her old & ancient education system, her culture, for if the Indians think that all that is foreign & English is good & greater than their own, they will lose their self esteem, their native culture & they will become what we want them a truly dominated nation.' - T Macauley
THIS INCLUDED REDUCING THE GLORIOUS HAINDAVA FAITH TO MERE "MYTH" SO THAT THEY COULD SPREAD THEIR MEANINGLESS NARROW XTIAN DOGMA.
THOSE BRITS WHO RULED HINDUSTAN ARE NOT EVEN WORTH SPITTING ON.
EXChristian0 2 years ago