@guyrocksurworld101 Nah...man.You just got me totally scared because only hard ass ppl talk shit over the web.Dude im gonna leave it at this and u can comment till your head falls off but are you fucking so...stupid to take a bet like that?You dont know who the fuck i am or what i can do.So piss off you web warrior faggot.
Check it out at 3:58 you can see my brother in the lower left-hand corner, right before his face gets covered by the woman sitting in front of him. Hahaha, his big "acting" claim to fame.
Another great scene is where Jerry and Buddy meet at the end in the student store.. you can almost see Buddy crack a smile... Buddy not saying a word, zero music in the background, also added to the surreal atmosphere.. such a great film!
Yet another great scene is where Jerry is sitting in the science class and the look of confusion and fear while being "pitched" a movie deal by the two film students..while watching a grasshopper being devoured, not to mention the girl gawking over at him in curiosity.. LOL, such a great film with rich interesting details such as this.
Still another great scene is of course the scene where Jerry climbs out on the roof thinking about the fight and if he should have "chickened" out.. the scenery and landscape in that particular scene of that surrounding school is incredible!
@EvilSlyGuy Was and/or is there any particular reason(s) why you selected at continuing on at badly tempting people? All it now requires is that you gladly accept less violence and less bad language into your own life to at therefore be gladly able to be a gooder person than you had been before. And, I know that such a good task is not non-possible, so therefore, gladly don't doubt your own good ability to have less violence and less bad language within your own life :)
@EvilSlyGuy Also and in otherwords, if you are truly here to properly expose violence and bad language, then it is also true that you would also expose it out of your own good life to therefore not allow violence and bad language into your own good life again.
One great scene is where Buddy and Jerry are in the principals office.. the scene where Buddy snaps the pen and the ink splatters across the principals family picture.. LOL.. pity great films like this are rare these days thanks to the PC crowd trying ban everything.
@EvilSlyGuy There you are again after reading all my right messages typing your own yet more "violence approvals" so to simply yet intentionally badly try me at badly ignoring your own bad ignorance. For the record again, I never wrote any writings to you so that you could intentionally try others and/or try me at making me appear and/or sound as if I had been badly to blame about the bad reasons why you had continued on at badly influencing more violence and bad language out to me and others.
One great scene is where Jerry is standing in the hallway hopelessly staring at the clock as other students walk on by, such a surreal scene and the music being played during it is like something from a horror film.. what a contrast and amazing film!
Another great scene is where Jerry and Buddy first meet, the way the camera zooms in on the start of Jerry's thrashing in the urinal... such focus on detail in this film which sadly most films of today don't do and the films show it..
Such a great film of the 80's... the books in Voyteks office are a riot.. such detail and great focus on the surreal is why this film is such a classic!
Sad so many get offended by EVERYTHING these days, which is why most films of today are boring and stale. "Here's Jerry Mitchell's file Mr. D" the look she then gives Jerry is a perfect example of the interesting camera work and surreal scenes, this film goes above and beyond!
Pity they don't make films like this anymore.. unless it's an independent film. "I don't think I've ever had you in my office before..." "growl.. BANG.. aaarrrghh.." "no.. I don't think I have been in your office before sir" LMAO.. Voytek is the epitome of the truant officer.. and then some!
Pity great films like this cannot be made anymore and are now inundated with reality crap, idol garbage, kitchen wars and shows about midget life.. thanks PC crowd.. This film has so much style, it is an incredible film to watch and take in.
What a great film! Sad ones like this are rare these days.. unless you watch an independent film.. The sheriff is another great character.. "yea... you can go.." what a voice.. and the music that follows leading into the next scene is pure win!
@EvilSlyGuy You had said: they JUST don't make them like they used too while then quoting a statement in the movie containing verbal profanity as your own way to prove that no other movies since Three O'Clock High had been the same as Three O'Clock High while yet you had been aware that many movies since Three O'Clock High had also had verbal profanities in them too. Therefore, you can't justify your own movie knowledge as "good" witnessing that you're movie knowledge is terribly bad.
@EvilSlyGuy Most your comments here at this YouTube website advertised "violence & profanity & evil criminal attitude are good things!" and you've been giving such evil things such as "profanity" and "the atomic bombs" and "Hitler-America" such large "praising" that it's rather you who should gladly enforce good things rather than evil things because who do you think you'll be badly fooling about your own good understanding when your own good understanding is evil? the answer is: EvilSlyGuy
@EvilSlyGuy If you don't like it when people having right understanding about pointing out evil attitude(s) do point out your own evil attitude(s) for all the right reasons which it had been, then why did you bother arriving here at YouTube?
@EvilSlyGuy Oh I know! It's because you had believed it was "a right" (and therefore not "a wrong") that more evil(s) unto/into the world be more included (such as: wrong (or) bad languages, and any/all violences), that that's why you had been badly confused about which words had been and/or are and/or would continue on at being good and/or evil.
Sad great films like this cannot be made anymore because someone might get "offended" at EVERYTHING these days... sad. This film is very rich, has interesting camera work, odd sounding soundtrack and surreal atmospheres and dialog... "I'm going to FIND you.." Voytek is my favorite!
Warning to all readers: EvilSlyGuy has implemented within his own all subtle however extremely bad comments the evil fib that people had been and/or are and/or will be better off without Jesus Christ. Therefore, gladly so "EvilSlyGuy" won't badly hurt you all and you any, I have therefore wisely included the following true message:
"EvilSlyGuy" should had not had asked me to leave Jesus Christ behind (and especially as a jacket) because any/all asking me and/or other(s) to do such any/all such bad mistake was and is and will be only badly meant to non-justly and therefore badly hurt me and all other(s).
So sad that some people get offended by EVERYTHING these days but this film is a perfect example of how films can be creative and intelligent. The camera angles, interesting camerawork and surreal dreamlike scenes make this a film to remember, pity some only focus on the violence which takes up about 10 minutes of this film. Political correctness has now given us reality crap, idol noise, kitchen yelling and programs about midgets to name a horrid few.. thanks PC crowd.
This film has so many surreal atmospheres, odd soundtracks and odd camera visuals.. it's almost like an Independent film of today.. pity films like this can't be made anymore because the thought and speech police will get "offended" and demand this be banned like many things in other countries seem to be today.. pity.
@EvilSlyGuy You had been badly mislead into the bad belief that you could be able to corruptively transcend a badly self-deceived imagination through as unnoticed against others whom are respected so to also slyfully yet badly convince others into believing that you and other people could be as sly enough as you so to get a good idea from some thing evil. Since any/all evil(s) could/will never provide any/all good idea(s), that's why you should gladly no longer depend upon any/all evil idea(s).
@EvilSlyGuy I intelligently did not mock EvilSlyGuy's and/or any/all other ones' own innocences because I had already nicely been given enough good wisdom from the truth to therefore be smart enough to defend true innocence rather than make the bad mistake to use it to defend corruption. The alias "EvilSlyGuy" (all on its own) mocks the innocence against and of the very same person who had invented "EvilSlyGuy". Therefore, EvilSlyGuy's own attempts at making me appear/sound evil had just failed.
This film had style and creativity.. pity political correctness and people getting all pissy and offended at everything today means films like this are mostly extinct and are now forced to watch reality crap or idol garbage.. thanks PC crowd.
@EvilSlyGuy I agree along with you about idolization not being any/all good as well as that so called "reality TV". However, I was hoping that you could take one and/or two and/or more steps back to nicely appreciate an ever better world at a time when films had never had any/all violence within them at all.
@dannyclark1973 That's ones choice if they wish to do this, and both are good choices. Why do you only point out the violence in this film? Violence is only in a small part of it, the rest is full of visuals, odd soundtracks and surreal atmospheres which makes this film so rich and interesting.
@EvilSlyGuy Some movie directors had filmed some rich and/or interesting scene(s) but at when and because those same some directors had also included any/all evil(s) (such as any/all violence) within those same some directors' own same some rich and/or interesting scene(s), it's then that those same some films had then also filmed the bad temptation that people should become interested and/or become rich through also committing any/all evil(s) (such as any/all violence).
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, if I am you, I would wisely be careful so that I would not allow any/all riches and/or any/all interests lead me into believing in violence (even whether any/all riches and/or any/all interests are associated to movies or not associate to movies). And I said that especially to you and to other people similar as you because you've (and other people such as you) had still been believing that those 2 U.S. atomic bombs had been such a "rich" and/or "interesting" thing.
@EvilSlyGuy I had only pointed towards the violence in the film "Three O'Clock High" because it's been many passed years some governments had believed that God's own law had authorized that violence should exist. However, should any/all violence (including movies) are only there or are partly there to only contribute more future violence to occur, then it's therefore that those any/all violence are not with the law because they contribute violence rather than contribute peacefulness.
@EvilSlyGuy You should it find it gladly funny that whenever we mutually agree about a truly good thing that it's you who then side-winds away (and not me) because you (just as me too) through your own words proved that you too do not enjoy reality TV and idol garbage, yet when I had agreed with you about what you had said about reality TV and idol garbage you then U-turned your own tongue to make it sound and appear as if you weren't really against reality TV and idol garbage....
@dannyclark1973 Who is anyone to say what kind of films one watches? If they wish to watch a violent or non violent film that's their choice. If this film makes you all offended, Scarface must make you have a stroke.. your getting offended at EVERYTHING attitude is a big part of the reason films today are dry and stale with zero substance.. thanks. Political correctness will ruin us all.
@EvilSlyGuy Are you really complaining!? There were/are/will be parents who gladly do not watch violent movies and who also gladly do not allow their own children to watch violent movies too. Therefore, when you had complained against me because you didn't want me telling you that you too should gladly not watch violent movies, was it then that you had also been complaining against those mindful caring parents too? Because.... (next message)
@EvilSlyGuy ...(message continued) if you say "yes" then it's also true that you are also AGAINST parents who gladly do not watch violent movies and you are also and therefore also AGAINST their children too and any/all others too who also gladly do not watch violent movies. If you had said "no", then it's nicely true that that would be a good thing and me along with many others would therefore give to you a much yet nice congratulations!
@EvilSlyGuy Next: In the passed 8 years, I've gladly done my own personal best at making sure that I no longer watch as many violent movies as I had because I'm gladly aiming myself to no longer watch any/all total violent movies. Therefore, please don't be ignorant towards me because (1) I had done the good work in cutting down my own violent movies intake about 95% and therefore (2) I could not be therefore possibly getting offended at EVERYTHING because I have less violence in my life now.
@EvilSlyGuy Peacefully get the picture? In other words, it's true that because you enjoy watching violent films and therefore have not yet reduced your own violence intake, it's therefore that it's been you who's been getting more offended more closer to that EVERYTHING attitude and not me.
@EvilSlyGuy This last: Witnessing that you had believed yourself to be such a "know-it-all" about political "correctness", it's not any/all wonder at all any/all longer about why and how you had been wrong about your own "know-it-all" political correctness because you too had also followed the U.S.A.' own similar yet bigger mistake such as when they too had also believed that they too had been politically correct about when they had dropped those 2 violently abusive atomic bombs upon Japan.
This is a good educational lesson: it was not my fault nor was it your fault that we had both learned in our lifetimes that the word "great" had meant "honourable" while also being mislead to believe any/all violence had been something worth "honouring". Therefore, any/all violence even within Three O'Clock High is never worth gladly honouring because violence is never good but whereas God is worth honouring because God's forever good but above all, God's also forever holy.
...hit 'em! Great film, pity more like this cannot be made today. Political correctness and people getting offended by everything today is a big part of the reason great films like this cannot be made anymore.
@dannyclark1973 It's a name.. get over it, you want it banned? What else do you want banned that you don't agree with? Violence is global, the fact you only mention the USA and violence shows your bias and hate of my country. I have not said one hateful thing at you, just pointing out your obvious hate of the USA, stop insinuating.
@dannyclark1973 Keep the childish insinuations to yourself. You forgot about the Soviet Union and their large stockpile, not to mention other countries.. again you prove my point about your bias of my country.
@EvilSlyGuy You had indirectly suggested to me and to others here that I (and therefore maybe others too) would all be righter persons through denying Jesus Christ's own good rights in being allowed to be around and within our own lives when it was because you remained under that own self yet false delusional belief about Jesus Christ being unreal such as an actor acting an act within a movie, that it's therefore the reason why you had not been the righter one here but could so gladly still be.
@EvilSlyGuy Then so be it! You had simply and just agreed with the very none of it of what I had said. Yes? But and however, because since then you had agreed with my own "none of it" but where and when I had never used the words "none of it" until this very message (3 times total now). Therefore will it be that you will now retake your own agreement that you had made to therefore agree with all of it of what I had said? Or, are you too tongue-tied to know which best answer to now give to me?
@EvilSlyGuy Regardless EvilSlyGuy, I will agree that you had not ever agreed to saying any such bad thing about Jesus Christ but only should you nicely agree that you had honestly been blindly deceived into saying those any such bad things about Jesus Christ that are present within your some small amount yet other comments made.
@EvilSlyGuy Oh truthfully yet additionally for the good records too: Jesus is not a jacket and a jacket is not Jesus because Jesus is Jesus and a jacket is a jacket. Therefore, creatively stop offending Jesus simply because you don't yet know well enough about him and if you did creatively know well enough about him properly, you gladly wouldn't bother offending (and/or try at offending) Jesus and/or any/all other Jesus Christ believers at all.
@EvilSlyGuy Also, your own lesser bad aggressiveness had became more badly aggressive towards me the moment that you had found out that I'm a Jesus Christ believer. Therefore, how dare you try to make people believe that I'm the one in the wrong here when it's because it you had said that you had not believed in Jesus Christ yourself (whom I did not push upon) had also became more badly aggressive towards me after the moments that you had found that I'm a Jesus Christ believer.
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, don't tell/show the fibs to people that I had been insinuating because it's obvious that because you had since then told/shown that you're a Jesus Christ non-believer, you had also told/shown through your own more badly aggressive attitude against me that you had also badly hated people who had believed and believe and will continue on believing in Jesus Christ.
@dannyclark1973 One only has to look here to witness some of the childish things you have said about me, just making an observation. Relax.. it's a movie.
@EvilSlyGuy However, thank you for your help at helping me to wordily expose some U.S.A.'s own hatreds because I had done such a nice thing to justly expose some badness within America so that you and others here could go on at discouraging violence properly because indeed I do love the U.S.A. because indeed I do hope that the U.S.A. properly ends their own violence just as but not as much as I had hoped but did still do righteously hope that the same will occur within ever other country.
@dannyclark1973 You only exposed your bias and hatred of my country.. yet again, violence is all over the globe, some very severe right now.. grow up.
@EvilSlyGuy No, I exposed: because the U.S.A. has been controlling the stock market through the world trade center's own national currency exchange exchanges and therefore has the most money in 1 nation but also because the U.S.A. had been badly deceived into priding themselves upon having the most dangerous weapons, that it's therefore and also true that the U.S.A. had been also deceived into also misleading other nations into following them from those same bad deceptive tracks.
@EvilSlyGuy The only point that you were trying to say that I had been helping you at proving had been that you were getting upset because you had been wrong.
@EvilSlyGuy No, not funny and not a fact that I had forgot them. Wait! Was it that you had forgotten that the U.S.S.R. had tried to bomb the U.S.A. during the cuban missile crisis back in the 1950s and 1960s? And, knowing that you yourself had not forgotten that incident, did you ever wonder how it arrived to be that the U.S.S.R. had been brought to want to hurt the U.S.A.?
@dannyclark1973 Stop changing the subject, my whole point was that other countries were developing these types of weapons during this time not to mention the USSR had many many more nuclear warheads. Now you want to talk about the cuban missile crisis.. from one topic to another.. and only when I show that the USA is not the only one to blame here for nuclear weapons. or other problems.. odd. Relax and stop over analyzing and getting offended by EVERYTHING.. why films suck today.. it's a movie!
@EvilSlyGuy I didn't change the subject. If 5 countries all have identical weapons but the U.S.A. (having the most money too) develops a stronger weapon and then uses that stronger weapon upon 1 other country, can't you agree that it was because U.S.A. had used such a stronger weapon that it had also and therefore been an enormous mistake because it had taught the other 4 countries too to also develop an even stronger weapons?
@EvilSlyGuy If the U.S.A.'s education had been so perfect as the U.S.A. had believed it was, then they would had not had used any/all atomic bombs because they would had realized that using any/all bigger weapons against any/all countries not having any/all equally bigger weapons would only instil enough revenge into those other countries to therefore cause some other countries to also waste their own money at building equally stronger weapons to get revenge upon the U.S.A.
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, if you love U.S.A. so much as you say you do, then it would be that you would stop giving so much honour and respect to the U.S.A.'s own atomic bomb because as it had been, you had instead loved the fact that the U.S.A. used the atomic bomb while not realizing that the U.S.A.'s atomic bombs had had only contributed and misled other countries to want to get revenge upon the U.S.A. such as the bad revenge against the U.S.A. that had occurred on 9/11.
@EvilSlyGuy Did you ever bother to insightfully ask yourself why any/all person(s) would ever bother to build any/all weapons at all? I'm telling you (once again) that if all nations permanently stop taxing their own nations taxes to gain themselves money to build warfare while also dismantle all their own weapons, then it would be that all people would happily not any/all longer be worried about any/all people containing any/all enormous national threats.
@EvilSlyGuy And, considering that it was the U.S. army who had committed the evillest attack throughout all history at when the U.S.A. government had abused 2 atomic bombs upon Japan, that therefore, it should logically be the U.S.A. government who therefore cleans up that bad mistake they had made through 1) nicely stopping themselves at charging U.S.A. citizens tax dollars for more U.S.A. warfare, 2) wisely pay the U.S.A. army salaries to dismantle the U.S.A.'s own weapons.
@EvilSlyGuy The fact is, those atomic bombs had badly scared many people enormously for such a long time that it's then that the U.S.A. people who've been priding themselves upon such a stupidity should stop doing that. Did you know that some innocent Japanese children born years later after the atomic bombs who had not been any/all reason(s) that the war in Japan had happened had bad mutation problems because of the evil genetic side-affects that those nuclear bombs had poisoned against them?
@dannyclark1973 Fact is Japan could have done the right thing and surrendered when it was obvious they lost the war, funny you keep ignoring this point, not to mention Japan attacked hundreds of Pacific targets during the war prior to the bombing, they could have avoided this but they refused to surrender.. not to also mention the horrid war crimes they committed. Is english your first language? Your rambling doesn't make much sense. We dropped the bombs to avoid millions dying in a land battle.
@EvilSlyGuy Nicely don't use Japan as your own and/or any/all others' own scapegoat to try to cover up the larger evil back then when because the larger evil had not been Japan but rather and instead all who had been involved within that war.
@EvilSlyGuy If you continue believing U.S.'s own atomic bombs always be and had been good within your own heart mind and soul, then it's also true that you would only be another bad problem in U.S. because you'd be intentionally putting the U.S.'s own bad blame that the U.S. had been badly to blame about against Japan and only to keep within you the bad belief that the U.S. was/is OH SO GOOD and Japan was/is OH SO EVIL because you're afraid that you're own country had/has large evils within it.
@EvilSlyGuy You can't fool those having any/all understanding about this. Simply because the U.S.'s own 2 large atomic yet badly catastrophic explosions had happened IN JAPAN back then, didn't ever signify and doesn't signify and won't ever signify that you always had/have any/all right(s) to believe that it's ALL Japan who had been the total large bad catastrophe back then simply because Japan had never been the ones who had ever dropped those 2 atomic yet badly catastrophic bombs upon Japan.
@dannyclark1973 The fact that you only look at the bombs dropping and not find out WHY we did this is disturbing, not to mention you seem to ignore the horrors the Empire of Japan did to get these bombs dropped on them in the first place.. this alone shows your hate and bias towards the USA.. stay in canada.
@EvilSlyGuy Gladly did already look into this and also found that it was you who didn't want to look further into those same bomb droppings because you were too afraid to find out that it was the U.S. who had committed a larger political non-correctness rather than Japan. As a good hypothetical example , should I too then also follow the bad example the U.S. had left back then to therefore go to you and kill you personally simply because I hate your ignorant words?No, gladly of course not!
@dannyclark1973 why does this not bother you? Japan surrendering would have been the right thing to do.. why does this not bother you? The fact that you only focus on the atomic bombs being dropped and not find out WHY they were dropped shows your bias of the USA. Trust me, 99% of TV today SUCKS! Who the hell wants to watch reality TV.. idol garbage, kitchen wars or shows about midgets..? Drama garbage for girls.. This film has so much more than violence, pity you only focus on that.
@EvilSlyGuy This does not bother me because I'm wise enough to gladly not allow you to tempt me, especially since witnessing that your own temptations have been out of the bad intentions of you wanting/needing to badly corrupt other people here. AND: The entire movie "Three O'Clock High" had only entirely reeled around the bad idea that it's best give revenge rather than give forgiveness.....
@EvilSlyGuy Nicely stop trying to cast your own self-pity towards me because by when you had done so, you had only put some more confusion against the other people here where and when such confusion had only been meant to badly get people to become focussed into believing that they too (as you) should also unjustly ignore the bad violence in the film "Three O'Clock High". Worded also: delightfully stop using the film's own "nice surroundings" to lure other people into the film's own "violence"!
@EvilSlyGuy Look at it this way: If I had moved into a house (A) that's next to your own house (B) and another person moved into another 1 house (C) located on your own other house's other side. If you (house B) and house C witnessed me (house A) had begun harbouring some dangerous weapons, then surely a much bigger problem would indeed be developing if house B and house C had also began harbouring dangerous weapons too even it so being that house A may or may not attack house B and house C.
@dannyclark1973 It's terribly and it's badly sickening that some U.S.A. people pride themselves on believing that the U.S.A. should continue on at controlling all the world and especially through the evil abuse in continuing on at intimidating other countries through the evil greed in controlling their own moneys through the stock market and through the evil wrath in building more and more highly technological and dangerouser warfare.
@EvilSlyGuy I now replace (house A) with the U.S.A. and (house B) with U.S.S.R. and (house C) with Cuba. In other words, the only reasons why the other nations had built their own warfares up had been because the U.S.A. had built their own warfares up higher than theirs where-then because that within itself was such an enourmously bad threat against the other nations that that had been the real reason why the other nations had decided to build their own weapons up too.
@EvilSlyGuy And, therefore, because I did and I do and I will wisely care about and love the U.S.A., that that's the good reason why I had been messaging you the message that it would be wiser that the U.S.A. start at lowering their army resources because it's true some other people within some other nations (including the U.S.A. too) have held bad enough grudges against each other about passed incidents to therefore want to go on ahead and make another bad mistake in once again attacking again.
@EvilSlyGuy By the way, it's the dragon (the Devil, Satan, the ancient serpent) who had so evilly yet slyfully imprinted those bad deceptive tracks so to try to badly mislead all the nations. I had said this to truthfully re-prove to you that I had not been putting all the 100% accusations against the U.S.A. and/or against any/all other nations alone.
@EvilSlyGuy No I don't believe "that sort of thing" because Satan was never and is never and will never be "a guy" and just for equal measure, Satan was also never and is also never and will also never be "a gal".
@EvilSlyGuy Any person(s) believing "Satan might be good" and/or "Satan might not exist" and/or "Satan might not be evil", would put those any person(s) into an evil trap that your own false suggestive comments would had at then been the reason why and how those any person(s) become badly hurt. Therefore, you so evilly daring yourself to go to any place(s) (such as YouTube) where and when the people there are perfect strangers should be all the reason why you should not tell them such evil fibs.
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, because you had arrived here to YouTube having some evil fibs only to use (abuse) against perfect strangers (innocent children included), it's therefore that your "EvilSlyGuy" YouTube account has gladly been justly reported against you to YouTube to ban your account because you had abused some dangerous beliefs against other people here and since because dangerous beliefs are also classified as badly threatening, are therefore also classified as criminal harassment.
@EvilSlyGuy When you typed "satan is a bad guy.. if you believe in that sort of thing..", not only did you also badly suggest to others "it's possible satan is not bad" but because the last 3 letters in your alias is typed "Guy" too, you had therefore also suggested to other people to follow you and in your own bad belief that Satan is possibly not evil (bad) which would only badly fool people into badly becoming hurt.
@EvilSlyGuy Who on earth do you believe that you are arriving at YouTube while abusing your own evil intentions against other people (including innocent children) into directly following Satan through your own evil little tricky words such as "yea.. satan is a bad guy.. if you believe in that sort of thing.."? You intentionally abused evilness against people so to badly confuse them into bad beliefs because you have some evil personal vendetta(s) out meant to badly hurt innocent people.
@EvilSlyGuy I am one who because a long time did not observe God's own word had therefore been a person who had also not yet grown up. However, because since when I along with others had since those times had been observing God's own word (8-9 years ago to date for me) had therefore already been more grown up than you, it's because we had completed our own leap of faith into believing in Jesus Christ that you have not yet done that that's it's you who so gladly needs to grow up too.
@EvilSlyGuy I'm 37 years old and I've been observing the Lord God almost 9 years total. I had learned through Jesus Christ that any/all accusation not be an any/all faulty accusation whenever that any/all and even childish accusation is from one of God's own children. I won't therefore keep my childish accusations to myself because as a child of God I am, I also and therefore care about all people upon earth and I therefore don't want/need for people on earth to be at war against each other.
@EvilSlyGuy I had told you that if the U.S.A. would had gladly dismantled their own weapons as they had so directed other countries to do in the past, then it's true that there would be lesser severe global violence at this date. It's for the U.S.A. government that you should gladly be telling them to nicely grow up because I (just as you should too) don't want the U.S.A. badly hurting their own country again.
@EvilSlyGuy You should gladly change your alias after when you may wisely realize that good can't agree WITH evil because evil always not WITH good because evil always AGAINST good but whereas seamingly we've been mostly AGAINST each other but whereas in reality I (and therefore NOT you) had been the one who had been mostly WITH us both because I nicely didn't want for you to continue believing evil beliefs such as any/all atomic bomb beliefs/violence because I don't want you to get hurt.
@dannyclark1973 Wow, could you ramble ANY more? You type alot but not much is being said. You IGNORE everything I type and go off on your own odd tangent, like many religious people seem to do. Fact still remains that the Empire of Japan started attacking numerous Pacific targets prior to Pearl Harbor, why does this not bother you? They also committed many war crimes against people of Asia and the South Pacific, why does this not bother you? They could have surrendered to avoid the bombs..
@dannyclark1973 I'll keep my name.. after all.. it's only a a name.. yet another thing you are getting "offended" at.. does EVERYTHING offend you? Scarface must make you quake. This attitude is a BIG part of the reason TV and films suck to high hell these days.. you got everyone walking on eggshells because they don't want to "offend" anyone.. thanks..
@EvilSlyGuy You're trying to blind other people with your own blindness. There have been many other films similar as "Three O'Clock High" had been since and when "Three O'Clock High" had ever been filmed and then viewed. And I had said that you had been blinded because you (along with any/all others) who condoned any/all films as "great films" simply because they had your "type" of violence within it had been blind because any/all violence (in total) had never been and will never be "great".
@EvilSlyGuy This is a good educational lesson: it was not my fault nor was it your fault that we had both learned in our lifetimes that the word "great" had meant "honourable" while also being mislead to believe any/all violence had been something worth "honouring". Therefore, any/all violence even within Three O'Clock High is never worth gladly honouring because violence is never good but whereas God is worth honouring because God's forever good but above all, God's also forever holy.
The "bully" with the white T-shirt had obviously been physically abused and therefore badly intimidated when he was younger and innocent when at that time other abused people had therefore badly put some bad hurt into him and was the reason why they could not trust him. So, abusing him again through using his own "brass knuckles" against him had not been the 100% good & accurate solution since such a large bad strike against him could had lured him into remaining that bad "bully" or worse.
If Mitchel and "the bully" had simply walked away rather than fight against each other, they would not had badly abused each other while also they would not had also had badly influenced any/all surrounding spectators to follow their own bad example(s) set.
When Jesus Christ had taught "Turn the other cheek", Jesus Christ had never suggested that turning the other cheek had ever meant that any person(s) should unrighteously strike an other any other person's/persons' own face because even when Jesus Christ himself was upon the planet Earth (close to 2000 passed years ago as of year 2011) and as much bad damage as the other(s) had so put against him, Jesus Christ had and will never retaliate with any/all evilness(es).
@Yisrafel It's unfortunate that america had been "taught" that the best remedy to cure "a bully" was to fight "that bully" until you knocked his/her lights out... Some people in america didn't bother to look deeper in to "a bully's eyes" to witness that "that bully" had been abused as a child and had therefore deserved love rather than hate. Therefore, knocking "that bully's" own lights out had never been the cure.
@dannyclark1973 So true, looks like the in the movies the only answer to violence is always more violence.
But it's important to notice that this was a common way of thinking at that time (I mean the 80's). Movies are not suposed to be some kind of parameter of behavior specially for younger audience. I think this is just some form of escapism where the boy that fights back succeeds. Although I have enjoyed watching those old-school teenage movies, real life is separate and different matter.
@Yisrafel With honesty, the real violence (most in America) had been worsened rather than had been less worsened. It's believed it's best that young people learn about having a restrained attitude rather than an unrestrained attitude. It was bad enough that much violence happened on earth as it was, therefore, movies and music having violent content never did help offer any 100% real help to people.
yeardley smith is a goddess
GhostBoyMass 1 month ago
Title is a play on "12:00 High", the old fighter pilot movie. Am I the only one who thinks Yeardley Smith is impossibly cute?
Jkbox1 1 month ago
@Jkbox1 Probably!
youtoubakias 1 month ago
@youtoubakias come on, her delivery is so sexy
Jkbox1 1 month ago
@Jkbox1 He he he
youtoubakias 1 month ago
Watched this as a kid...totally made me think that high school was gonna be like this...had me scared lol
BrockL191 3 months ago
sum1 doesnt know how to IVTC
funk192 3 months ago
YOU AND ME! 3 O CLOCK!!
BermudaEntrepreneur 3 months ago
Oh yeah, The psycho dad from kindergarten cop.
lazyassbum 4 months ago
Buddy got left back another 15 years after this!
crankylifter 5 months ago
"I told you I don't like people knowing about me so you can take that newspaper of yours and wipe your cock off with it".
twilightriverlove 6 months ago
great video and a great movie. this was in the top 5 of the best 80s movies on my list that i saw at the movie theater. thanks for posting.
madjoe41 6 months ago
Does ANYONE in this school wash their hands after going to the bathroom?
82rondo 7 months ago
you forgot Jerry making out with the teacher!
Zoras88 7 months ago
does this guy look like mark sanchez or what?
blink180heights 8 months ago
Thats Yeardley Smith, voice of Lisa Simpson
joshjhutton 8 months ago 2
@joshjhutton Well no shit geniouis.
Crimson7588 3 months ago
i saw this movie when i was young, i thought buddy was played by Heath Ledger
afroman255 8 months ago
They look a bit old for college students LOL
NatalieSpa 8 months ago
@NatalieSpa it's a high school.
Zoras88 7 months ago
They look a it old for college students LOL
NatalieSpa 8 months ago
Where's everyones cellphone camera during the fight?
dizkoteck 8 months ago
Im like Buddy i hate ppl touching me but ill get locked up if i just start knocking ppl out so i just yell at them.STOP FUCKING TOUCHING ME!!!!
thegame2011able 8 months ago
@thegame2011able i bet id beat u in a fight cause i do boxing AND RUGBY
guyrocksurworld101 6 months ago
@guyrocksurworld101 wow........
thegame2011able 6 months ago
@thegame2011able was that sarcasm
guyrocksurworld101 6 months ago
@guyrocksurworld101 Nah...man.You just got me totally scared because only hard ass ppl talk shit over the web.Dude im gonna leave it at this and u can comment till your head falls off but are you fucking so...stupid to take a bet like that?You dont know who the fuck i am or what i can do.So piss off you web warrior faggot.
thegame2011able 6 months ago
@guyrocksurworld101 They call me sleepy eyed Joe and i gonna muff you up.
Crimson7588 3 months ago
@Crimson7588 really u message me know after two monts ughhh either way id still beat u
guyrocksurworld101 3 months ago
"Don't fuck this up Mitchell!"
WSW55 9 months ago 16
@WSW55 He he hee i love his teacher when he sais that!
youtoubakias 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check it out at 3:58 you can see my brother in the lower left-hand corner, right before his face gets covered by the woman sitting in front of him. Hahaha, his big "acting" claim to fame.
drewood 9 months ago
Comment removed
drewood 9 months ago
First girl talking is Lisa Simpson's voice, hehe! UNCANNY!
amazingdany 9 months ago
Another great scene is where Jerry and Buddy meet at the end in the student store.. you can almost see Buddy crack a smile... Buddy not saying a word, zero music in the background, also added to the surreal atmosphere.. such a great film!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Yet another great scene is where Jerry is sitting in the science class and the look of confusion and fear while being "pitched" a movie deal by the two film students..while watching a grasshopper being devoured, not to mention the girl gawking over at him in curiosity.. LOL, such a great film with rich interesting details such as this.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Still another great scene is of course the scene where Jerry climbs out on the roof thinking about the fight and if he should have "chickened" out.. the scenery and landscape in that particular scene of that surrounding school is incredible!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Was and/or is there any particular reason(s) why you selected at continuing on at badly tempting people? All it now requires is that you gladly accept less violence and less bad language into your own life to at therefore be gladly able to be a gooder person than you had been before. And, I know that such a good task is not non-possible, so therefore, gladly don't doubt your own good ability to have less violence and less bad language within your own life :)
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Also and in otherwords, if you are truly here to properly expose violence and bad language, then it is also true that you would also expose it out of your own good life to therefore not allow violence and bad language into your own good life again.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
One great scene is where Buddy and Jerry are in the principals office.. the scene where Buddy snaps the pen and the ink splatters across the principals family picture.. LOL.. pity great films like this are rare these days thanks to the PC crowd trying ban everything.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy There you are again after reading all my right messages typing your own yet more "violence approvals" so to simply yet intentionally badly try me at badly ignoring your own bad ignorance. For the record again, I never wrote any writings to you so that you could intentionally try others and/or try me at making me appear and/or sound as if I had been badly to blame about the bad reasons why you had continued on at badly influencing more violence and bad language out to me and others.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
One great scene is where Jerry is standing in the hallway hopelessly staring at the clock as other students walk on by, such a surreal scene and the music being played during it is like something from a horror film.. what a contrast and amazing film!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Another great scene is where Jerry and Buddy first meet, the way the camera zooms in on the start of Jerry's thrashing in the urinal... such focus on detail in this film which sadly most films of today don't do and the films show it..
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Such a great film of the 80's... the books in Voyteks office are a riot.. such detail and great focus on the surreal is why this film is such a classic!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Sad so many get offended by EVERYTHING these days, which is why most films of today are boring and stale. "Here's Jerry Mitchell's file Mr. D" the look she then gives Jerry is a perfect example of the interesting camera work and surreal scenes, this film goes above and beyond!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Pity they don't make films like this anymore.. unless it's an independent film. "I don't think I've ever had you in my office before..." "growl.. BANG.. aaarrrghh.." "no.. I don't think I have been in your office before sir" LMAO.. Voytek is the epitome of the truant officer.. and then some!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Pity great films like this cannot be made anymore and are now inundated with reality crap, idol garbage, kitchen wars and shows about midget life.. thanks PC crowd.. This film has so much style, it is an incredible film to watch and take in.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
What a great film! Sad ones like this are rare these days.. unless you watch an independent film.. The sheriff is another great character.. "yea... you can go.." what a voice.. and the music that follows leading into the next scene is pure win!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Not to mention the dreamlike surreal scenes throughout the film.. they just don't make 'em like they used too.. "Don't fuck this up mitchell!" LOL
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EvilSlyGuy You had said: they JUST don't make them like they used too while then quoting a statement in the movie containing verbal profanity as your own way to prove that no other movies since Three O'Clock High had been the same as Three O'Clock High while yet you had been aware that many movies since Three O'Clock High had also had verbal profanities in them too. Therefore, you can't justify your own movie knowledge as "good" witnessing that you're movie knowledge is terribly bad.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Most your comments here at this YouTube website advertised "violence & profanity & evil criminal attitude are good things!" and you've been giving such evil things such as "profanity" and "the atomic bombs" and "Hitler-America" such large "praising" that it's rather you who should gladly enforce good things rather than evil things because who do you think you'll be badly fooling about your own good understanding when your own good understanding is evil? the answer is: EvilSlyGuy
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy If you don't like it when people having right understanding about pointing out evil attitude(s) do point out your own evil attitude(s) for all the right reasons which it had been, then why did you bother arriving here at YouTube?
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Oh I know! It's because you had believed it was "a right" (and therefore not "a wrong") that more evil(s) unto/into the world be more included (such as: wrong (or) bad languages, and any/all violences), that that's why you had been badly confused about which words had been and/or are and/or would continue on at being good and/or evil.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Sad great films like this cannot be made anymore because someone might get "offended" at EVERYTHING these days... sad. This film is very rich, has interesting camera work, odd sounding soundtrack and surreal atmospheres and dialog... "I'm going to FIND you.." Voytek is my favorite!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Warning to all readers: EvilSlyGuy has implemented within his own all subtle however extremely bad comments the evil fib that people had been and/or are and/or will be better off without Jesus Christ. Therefore, gladly so "EvilSlyGuy" won't badly hurt you all and you any, I have therefore wisely included the following true message:
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
"EvilSlyGuy" should had not had asked me to leave Jesus Christ behind (and especially as a jacket) because any/all asking me and/or other(s) to do such any/all such bad mistake was and is and will be only badly meant to non-justly and therefore badly hurt me and all other(s).
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Love how Jerry's "sweater pull" remains with him minutes after his encounter with Buddy.. you a blackbelt or something? You look kinda small... LMAO!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Like I said, sad that some people get all pissy and god damned offended at EVERYTHING nowadays.. makes films boring and plain jane.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Sad some can be so damn sensitive nowadays.. makes films stale and dry when someone cries over EVERY last thing.. thanks PC crowd.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
So sad that some people get offended by EVERYTHING these days but this film is a perfect example of how films can be creative and intelligent. The camera angles, interesting camerawork and surreal dreamlike scenes make this a film to remember, pity some only focus on the violence which takes up about 10 minutes of this film. Political correctness has now given us reality crap, idol noise, kitchen yelling and programs about midgets to name a horrid few.. thanks PC crowd.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
This film has so many surreal atmospheres, odd soundtracks and odd camera visuals.. it's almost like an Independent film of today.. pity films like this can't be made anymore because the thought and speech police will get "offended" and demand this be banned like many things in other countries seem to be today.. pity.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy You had been badly mislead into the bad belief that you could be able to corruptively transcend a badly self-deceived imagination through as unnoticed against others whom are respected so to also slyfully yet badly convince others into believing that you and other people could be as sly enough as you so to get a good idea from some thing evil. Since any/all evil(s) could/will never provide any/all good idea(s), that's why you should gladly no longer depend upon any/all evil idea(s).
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I intelligently did not mock EvilSlyGuy's and/or any/all other ones' own innocences because I had already nicely been given enough good wisdom from the truth to therefore be smart enough to defend true innocence rather than make the bad mistake to use it to defend corruption. The alias "EvilSlyGuy" (all on its own) mocks the innocence against and of the very same person who had invented "EvilSlyGuy". Therefore, EvilSlyGuy's own attempts at making me appear/sound evil had just failed.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
This film had style and creativity.. pity political correctness and people getting all pissy and offended at everything today means films like this are mostly extinct and are now forced to watch reality crap or idol garbage.. thanks PC crowd.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I agree along with you about idolization not being any/all good as well as that so called "reality TV". However, I was hoping that you could take one and/or two and/or more steps back to nicely appreciate an ever better world at a time when films had never had any/all violence within them at all.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 That's ones choice if they wish to do this, and both are good choices. Why do you only point out the violence in this film? Violence is only in a small part of it, the rest is full of visuals, odd soundtracks and surreal atmospheres which makes this film so rich and interesting.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Some movie directors had filmed some rich and/or interesting scene(s) but at when and because those same some directors had also included any/all evil(s) (such as any/all violence) within those same some directors' own same some rich and/or interesting scene(s), it's then that those same some films had then also filmed the bad temptation that people should become interested and/or become rich through also committing any/all evil(s) (such as any/all violence).
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, if I am you, I would wisely be careful so that I would not allow any/all riches and/or any/all interests lead me into believing in violence (even whether any/all riches and/or any/all interests are associated to movies or not associate to movies). And I said that especially to you and to other people similar as you because you've (and other people such as you) had still been believing that those 2 U.S. atomic bombs had been such a "rich" and/or "interesting" thing.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I had only pointed towards the violence in the film "Three O'Clock High" because it's been many passed years some governments had believed that God's own law had authorized that violence should exist. However, should any/all violence (including movies) are only there or are partly there to only contribute more future violence to occur, then it's therefore that those any/all violence are not with the law because they contribute violence rather than contribute peacefulness.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy You should it find it gladly funny that whenever we mutually agree about a truly good thing that it's you who then side-winds away (and not me) because you (just as me too) through your own words proved that you too do not enjoy reality TV and idol garbage, yet when I had agreed with you about what you had said about reality TV and idol garbage you then U-turned your own tongue to make it sound and appear as if you weren't really against reality TV and idol garbage....
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Who is anyone to say what kind of films one watches? If they wish to watch a violent or non violent film that's their choice. If this film makes you all offended, Scarface must make you have a stroke.. your getting offended at EVERYTHING attitude is a big part of the reason films today are dry and stale with zero substance.. thanks. Political correctness will ruin us all.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Are you really complaining!? There were/are/will be parents who gladly do not watch violent movies and who also gladly do not allow their own children to watch violent movies too. Therefore, when you had complained against me because you didn't want me telling you that you too should gladly not watch violent movies, was it then that you had also been complaining against those mindful caring parents too? Because.... (next message)
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy ...(message continued) if you say "yes" then it's also true that you are also AGAINST parents who gladly do not watch violent movies and you are also and therefore also AGAINST their children too and any/all others too who also gladly do not watch violent movies. If you had said "no", then it's nicely true that that would be a good thing and me along with many others would therefore give to you a much yet nice congratulations!
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Next: In the passed 8 years, I've gladly done my own personal best at making sure that I no longer watch as many violent movies as I had because I'm gladly aiming myself to no longer watch any/all total violent movies. Therefore, please don't be ignorant towards me because (1) I had done the good work in cutting down my own violent movies intake about 95% and therefore (2) I could not be therefore possibly getting offended at EVERYTHING because I have less violence in my life now.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Peacefully get the picture? In other words, it's true that because you enjoy watching violent films and therefore have not yet reduced your own violence intake, it's therefore that it's been you who's been getting more offended more closer to that EVERYTHING attitude and not me.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy This last: Witnessing that you had believed yourself to be such a "know-it-all" about political "correctness", it's not any/all wonder at all any/all longer about why and how you had been wrong about your own "know-it-all" political correctness because you too had also followed the U.S.A.' own similar yet bigger mistake such as when they too had also believed that they too had been politically correct about when they had dropped those 2 violently abusive atomic bombs upon Japan.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
This is a good educational lesson: it was not my fault nor was it your fault that we had both learned in our lifetimes that the word "great" had meant "honourable" while also being mislead to believe any/all violence had been something worth "honouring". Therefore, any/all violence even within Three O'Clock High is never worth gladly honouring because violence is never good but whereas God is worth honouring because God's forever good but above all, God's also forever holy.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
...hit 'em! Great film, pity more like this cannot be made today. Political correctness and people getting offended by everything today is a big part of the reason great films like this cannot be made anymore.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 It's a name.. get over it, you want it banned? What else do you want banned that you don't agree with? Violence is global, the fact you only mention the USA and violence shows your bias and hate of my country. I have not said one hateful thing at you, just pointing out your obvious hate of the USA, stop insinuating.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Keep the childish insinuations to yourself. You forgot about the Soviet Union and their large stockpile, not to mention other countries.. again you prove my point about your bias of my country.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Now back on to religion.. put away the jesus jacket, you said these things.. not me. Calm down.. it's a movie.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy You had indirectly suggested to me and to others here that I (and therefore maybe others too) would all be righter persons through denying Jesus Christ's own good rights in being allowed to be around and within our own lives when it was because you remained under that own self yet false delusional belief about Jesus Christ being unreal such as an actor acting an act within a movie, that it's therefore the reason why you had not been the righter one here but could so gladly still be.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 I never said any such thing, stop lying, you can follow whoever or whatever you wish, I just agree with none of it.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Then so be it! You had simply and just agreed with the very none of it of what I had said. Yes? But and however, because since then you had agreed with my own "none of it" but where and when I had never used the words "none of it" until this very message (3 times total now). Therefore will it be that you will now retake your own agreement that you had made to therefore agree with all of it of what I had said? Or, are you too tongue-tied to know which best answer to now give to me?
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Regardless EvilSlyGuy, I will agree that you had not ever agreed to saying any such bad thing about Jesus Christ but only should you nicely agree that you had honestly been blindly deceived into saying those any such bad things about Jesus Christ that are present within your some small amount yet other comments made.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Oh truthfully yet additionally for the good records too: Jesus is not a jacket and a jacket is not Jesus because Jesus is Jesus and a jacket is a jacket. Therefore, creatively stop offending Jesus simply because you don't yet know well enough about him and if you did creatively know well enough about him properly, you gladly wouldn't bother offending (and/or try at offending) Jesus and/or any/all other Jesus Christ believers at all.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Also, your own lesser bad aggressiveness had became more badly aggressive towards me the moment that you had found out that I'm a Jesus Christ believer. Therefore, how dare you try to make people believe that I'm the one in the wrong here when it's because it you had said that you had not believed in Jesus Christ yourself (whom I did not push upon) had also became more badly aggressive towards me after the moments that you had found that I'm a Jesus Christ believer.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, don't tell/show the fibs to people that I had been insinuating because it's obvious that because you had since then told/shown that you're a Jesus Christ non-believer, you had also told/shown through your own more badly aggressive attitude against me that you had also badly hated people who had believed and believe and will continue on believing in Jesus Christ.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 One only has to look here to witness some of the childish things you have said about me, just making an observation. Relax.. it's a movie.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy However, thank you for your help at helping me to wordily expose some U.S.A.'s own hatreds because I had done such a nice thing to justly expose some badness within America so that you and others here could go on at discouraging violence properly because indeed I do love the U.S.A. because indeed I do hope that the U.S.A. properly ends their own violence just as but not as much as I had hoped but did still do righteously hope that the same will occur within ever other country.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 You only exposed your bias and hatred of my country.. yet again, violence is all over the globe, some very severe right now.. grow up.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy No, I exposed: because the U.S.A. has been controlling the stock market through the world trade center's own national currency exchange exchanges and therefore has the most money in 1 nation but also because the U.S.A. had been badly deceived into priding themselves upon having the most dangerous weapons, that it's therefore and also true that the U.S.A. had been also deceived into also misleading other nations into following them from those same bad deceptive tracks.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Now were on to the stock market.. more topic shift, again you just prove my point for me.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy The only point that you were trying to say that I had been helping you at proving had been that you were getting upset because you had been wrong.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 The USSR had more nuclear weapons.. fact, funny you forgot them..
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy No, not funny and not a fact that I had forgot them. Wait! Was it that you had forgotten that the U.S.S.R. had tried to bomb the U.S.A. during the cuban missile crisis back in the 1950s and 1960s? And, knowing that you yourself had not forgotten that incident, did you ever wonder how it arrived to be that the U.S.S.R. had been brought to want to hurt the U.S.A.?
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Stop changing the subject, my whole point was that other countries were developing these types of weapons during this time not to mention the USSR had many many more nuclear warheads. Now you want to talk about the cuban missile crisis.. from one topic to another.. and only when I show that the USA is not the only one to blame here for nuclear weapons. or other problems.. odd. Relax and stop over analyzing and getting offended by EVERYTHING.. why films suck today.. it's a movie!
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I didn't change the subject. If 5 countries all have identical weapons but the U.S.A. (having the most money too) develops a stronger weapon and then uses that stronger weapon upon 1 other country, can't you agree that it was because U.S.A. had used such a stronger weapon that it had also and therefore been an enormous mistake because it had taught the other 4 countries too to also develop an even stronger weapons?
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy If the U.S.A.'s education had been so perfect as the U.S.A. had believed it was, then they would had not had used any/all atomic bombs because they would had realized that using any/all bigger weapons against any/all countries not having any/all equally bigger weapons would only instil enough revenge into those other countries to therefore cause some other countries to also waste their own money at building equally stronger weapons to get revenge upon the U.S.A.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, if you love U.S.A. so much as you say you do, then it would be that you would stop giving so much honour and respect to the U.S.A.'s own atomic bomb because as it had been, you had instead loved the fact that the U.S.A. used the atomic bomb while not realizing that the U.S.A.'s atomic bombs had had only contributed and misled other countries to want to get revenge upon the U.S.A. such as the bad revenge against the U.S.A. that had occurred on 9/11.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Did you ever bother to insightfully ask yourself why any/all person(s) would ever bother to build any/all weapons at all? I'm telling you (once again) that if all nations permanently stop taxing their own nations taxes to gain themselves money to build warfare while also dismantle all their own weapons, then it would be that all people would happily not any/all longer be worried about any/all people containing any/all enormous national threats.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy And, considering that it was the U.S. army who had committed the evillest attack throughout all history at when the U.S.A. government had abused 2 atomic bombs upon Japan, that therefore, it should logically be the U.S.A. government who therefore cleans up that bad mistake they had made through 1) nicely stopping themselves at charging U.S.A. citizens tax dollars for more U.S.A. warfare, 2) wisely pay the U.S.A. army salaries to dismantle the U.S.A.'s own weapons.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy The fact is, those atomic bombs had badly scared many people enormously for such a long time that it's then that the U.S.A. people who've been priding themselves upon such a stupidity should stop doing that. Did you know that some innocent Japanese children born years later after the atomic bombs who had not been any/all reason(s) that the war in Japan had happened had bad mutation problems because of the evil genetic side-affects that those nuclear bombs had poisoned against them?
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Fact is Japan could have done the right thing and surrendered when it was obvious they lost the war, funny you keep ignoring this point, not to mention Japan attacked hundreds of Pacific targets during the war prior to the bombing, they could have avoided this but they refused to surrender.. not to also mention the horrid war crimes they committed. Is english your first language? Your rambling doesn't make much sense. We dropped the bombs to avoid millions dying in a land battle.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Nicely don't use Japan as your own and/or any/all others' own scapegoat to try to cover up the larger evil back then when because the larger evil had not been Japan but rather and instead all who had been involved within that war.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy If you continue believing U.S.'s own atomic bombs always be and had been good within your own heart mind and soul, then it's also true that you would only be another bad problem in U.S. because you'd be intentionally putting the U.S.'s own bad blame that the U.S. had been badly to blame about against Japan and only to keep within you the bad belief that the U.S. was/is OH SO GOOD and Japan was/is OH SO EVIL because you're afraid that you're own country had/has large evils within it.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy You can't fool those having any/all understanding about this. Simply because the U.S.'s own 2 large atomic yet badly catastrophic explosions had happened IN JAPAN back then, didn't ever signify and doesn't signify and won't ever signify that you always had/have any/all right(s) to believe that it's ALL Japan who had been the total large bad catastrophe back then simply because Japan had never been the ones who had ever dropped those 2 atomic yet badly catastrophic bombs upon Japan.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 The fact that you only look at the bombs dropping and not find out WHY we did this is disturbing, not to mention you seem to ignore the horrors the Empire of Japan did to get these bombs dropped on them in the first place.. this alone shows your hate and bias towards the USA.. stay in canada.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Gladly did already look into this and also found that it was you who didn't want to look further into those same bomb droppings because you were too afraid to find out that it was the U.S. who had committed a larger political non-correctness rather than Japan. As a good hypothetical example , should I too then also follow the bad example the U.S. had left back then to therefore go to you and kill you personally simply because I hate your ignorant words?No, gladly of course not!
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 why does this not bother you? Japan surrendering would have been the right thing to do.. why does this not bother you? The fact that you only focus on the atomic bombs being dropped and not find out WHY they were dropped shows your bias of the USA. Trust me, 99% of TV today SUCKS! Who the hell wants to watch reality TV.. idol garbage, kitchen wars or shows about midgets..? Drama garbage for girls.. This film has so much more than violence, pity you only focus on that.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy This does not bother me because I'm wise enough to gladly not allow you to tempt me, especially since witnessing that your own temptations have been out of the bad intentions of you wanting/needing to badly corrupt other people here. AND: The entire movie "Three O'Clock High" had only entirely reeled around the bad idea that it's best give revenge rather than give forgiveness.....
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Nicely stop trying to cast your own self-pity towards me because by when you had done so, you had only put some more confusion against the other people here where and when such confusion had only been meant to badly get people to become focussed into believing that they too (as you) should also unjustly ignore the bad violence in the film "Three O'Clock High". Worded also: delightfully stop using the film's own "nice surroundings" to lure other people into the film's own "violence"!
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Look at it this way: If I had moved into a house (A) that's next to your own house (B) and another person moved into another 1 house (C) located on your own other house's other side. If you (house B) and house C witnessed me (house A) had begun harbouring some dangerous weapons, then surely a much bigger problem would indeed be developing if house B and house C had also began harbouring dangerous weapons too even it so being that house A may or may not attack house B and house C.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dannyclark1973 It's terribly and it's badly sickening that some U.S.A. people pride themselves on believing that the U.S.A. should continue on at controlling all the world and especially through the evil abuse in continuing on at intimidating other countries through the evil greed in controlling their own moneys through the stock market and through the evil wrath in building more and more highly technological and dangerouser warfare.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I now replace (house A) with the U.S.A. and (house B) with U.S.S.R. and (house C) with Cuba. In other words, the only reasons why the other nations had built their own warfares up had been because the U.S.A. had built their own warfares up higher than theirs where-then because that within itself was such an enourmously bad threat against the other nations that that had been the real reason why the other nations had decided to build their own weapons up too.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy And, therefore, because I did and I do and I will wisely care about and love the U.S.A., that that's the good reason why I had been messaging you the message that it would be wiser that the U.S.A. start at lowering their army resources because it's true some other people within some other nations (including the U.S.A. too) have held bad enough grudges against each other about passed incidents to therefore want to go on ahead and make another bad mistake in once again attacking again.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Not to mention other countries were researching these types of weapons during this time.. funny you forgot to mention this as well..
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy By the way, it's the dragon (the Devil, Satan, the ancient serpent) who had so evilly yet slyfully imprinted those bad deceptive tracks so to try to badly mislead all the nations. I had said this to truthfully re-prove to you that I had not been putting all the 100% accusations against the U.S.A. and/or against any/all other nations alone.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Yea.. satan is a bad guy.. if you believe in that sort of thing..
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy No I don't believe "that sort of thing" because Satan was never and is never and will never be "a guy" and just for equal measure, Satan was also never and is also never and will also never be "a gal".
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Any person(s) believing "Satan might be good" and/or "Satan might not exist" and/or "Satan might not be evil", would put those any person(s) into an evil trap that your own false suggestive comments would had at then been the reason why and how those any person(s) become badly hurt. Therefore, you so evilly daring yourself to go to any place(s) (such as YouTube) where and when the people there are perfect strangers should be all the reason why you should not tell them such evil fibs.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Therefore, because you had arrived here to YouTube having some evil fibs only to use (abuse) against perfect strangers (innocent children included), it's therefore that your "EvilSlyGuy" YouTube account has gladly been justly reported against you to YouTube to ban your account because you had abused some dangerous beliefs against other people here and since because dangerous beliefs are also classified as badly threatening, are therefore also classified as criminal harassment.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@EvilSlyGuy When you typed "satan is a bad guy.. if you believe in that sort of thing..", not only did you also badly suggest to others "it's possible satan is not bad" but because the last 3 letters in your alias is typed "Guy" too, you had therefore also suggested to other people to follow you and in your own bad belief that Satan is possibly not evil (bad) which would only badly fool people into badly becoming hurt.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy Who on earth do you believe that you are arriving at YouTube while abusing your own evil intentions against other people (including innocent children) into directly following Satan through your own evil little tricky words such as "yea.. satan is a bad guy.. if you believe in that sort of thing.."? You intentionally abused evilness against people so to badly confuse them into bad beliefs because you have some evil personal vendetta(s) out meant to badly hurt innocent people.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I am one who because a long time did not observe God's own word had therefore been a person who had also not yet grown up. However, because since when I along with others had since those times had been observing God's own word (8-9 years ago to date for me) had therefore already been more grown up than you, it's because we had completed our own leap of faith into believing in Jesus Christ that you have not yet done that that's it's you who so gladly needs to grow up too.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Intelligent rebuttal.. keep the childish accusations to yourself.
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I'm 37 years old and I've been observing the Lord God almost 9 years total. I had learned through Jesus Christ that any/all accusation not be an any/all faulty accusation whenever that any/all and even childish accusation is from one of God's own children. I won't therefore keep my childish accusations to myself because as a child of God I am, I also and therefore care about all people upon earth and I therefore don't want/need for people on earth to be at war against each other.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy I had told you that if the U.S.A. would had gladly dismantled their own weapons as they had so directed other countries to do in the past, then it's true that there would be lesser severe global violence at this date. It's for the U.S.A. government that you should gladly be telling them to nicely grow up because I (just as you should too) don't want the U.S.A. badly hurting their own country again.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy You should gladly change your alias after when you may wisely realize that good can't agree WITH evil because evil always not WITH good because evil always AGAINST good but whereas seamingly we've been mostly AGAINST each other but whereas in reality I (and therefore NOT you) had been the one who had been mostly WITH us both because I nicely didn't want for you to continue believing evil beliefs such as any/all atomic bomb beliefs/violence because I don't want you to get hurt.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 Wow, could you ramble ANY more? You type alot but not much is being said. You IGNORE everything I type and go off on your own odd tangent, like many religious people seem to do. Fact still remains that the Empire of Japan started attacking numerous Pacific targets prior to Pearl Harbor, why does this not bother you? They also committed many war crimes against people of Asia and the South Pacific, why does this not bother you? They could have surrendered to avoid the bombs..
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@dannyclark1973 I'll keep my name.. after all.. it's only a a name.. yet another thing you are getting "offended" at.. does EVERYTHING offend you? Scarface must make you quake. This attitude is a BIG part of the reason TV and films suck to high hell these days.. you got everyone walking on eggshells because they don't want to "offend" anyone.. thanks..
EvilSlyGuy 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy You're trying to blind other people with your own blindness. There have been many other films similar as "Three O'Clock High" had been since and when "Three O'Clock High" had ever been filmed and then viewed. And I had said that you had been blinded because you (along with any/all others) who condoned any/all films as "great films" simply because they had your "type" of violence within it had been blind because any/all violence (in total) had never been and will never be "great".
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
@EvilSlyGuy This is a good educational lesson: it was not my fault nor was it your fault that we had both learned in our lifetimes that the word "great" had meant "honourable" while also being mislead to believe any/all violence had been something worth "honouring". Therefore, any/all violence even within Three O'Clock High is never worth gladly honouring because violence is never good but whereas God is worth honouring because God's forever good but above all, God's also forever holy.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
The "bully" with the white T-shirt had obviously been physically abused and therefore badly intimidated when he was younger and innocent when at that time other abused people had therefore badly put some bad hurt into him and was the reason why they could not trust him. So, abusing him again through using his own "brass knuckles" against him had not been the 100% good & accurate solution since such a large bad strike against him could had lured him into remaining that bad "bully" or worse.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If Mitchel and "the bully" had simply walked away rather than fight against each other, they would not had badly abused each other while also they would not had also had badly influenced any/all surrounding spectators to follow their own bad example(s) set.
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
When Jesus Christ had taught "Turn the other cheek", Jesus Christ had never suggested that turning the other cheek had ever meant that any person(s) should unrighteously strike an other any other person's/persons' own face because even when Jesus Christ himself was upon the planet Earth (close to 2000 passed years ago as of year 2011) and as much bad damage as the other(s) had so put against him, Jesus Christ had and will never retaliate with any/all evilness(es).
dannyclark1973 9 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 10 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 10 months ago
Comment removed
dannyclark1973 10 months ago
Cripple The Dick...
EricV1 10 months ago
When the first time I saw this movie,I told myself,I would rather have that teacher,"Miss Farmer",than the popular senior "pretty girl".
TheXtro101 11 months ago
6:27 Classic!
thookies 11 months ago
My Bodyguard (1980), Karate Kid (1984) and Three O'Clock High (1987) are my favorite bullying themed.
Yisrafel 11 months ago
@Yisrafel It's unfortunate that america had been "taught" that the best remedy to cure "a bully" was to fight "that bully" until you knocked his/her lights out... Some people in america didn't bother to look deeper in to "a bully's eyes" to witness that "that bully" had been abused as a child and had therefore deserved love rather than hate. Therefore, knocking "that bully's" own lights out had never been the cure.
dannyclark1973 10 months ago
@dannyclark1973 So true, looks like the in the movies the only answer to violence is always more violence.
But it's important to notice that this was a common way of thinking at that time (I mean the 80's). Movies are not suposed to be some kind of parameter of behavior specially for younger audience. I think this is just some form of escapism where the boy that fights back succeeds. Although I have enjoyed watching those old-school teenage movies, real life is separate and different matter.
Yisrafel 10 months ago
@Yisrafel With honesty, the real violence (most in America) had been worsened rather than had been less worsened. It's believed it's best that young people learn about having a restrained attitude rather than an unrestrained attitude. It was bad enough that much violence happened on earth as it was, therefore, movies and music having violent content never did help offer any 100% real help to people.
dannyclark1973 10 months ago