You don't even need science to prove that last finding. It makes logical sense, you just have to get the overload and pump in your muscles and they'll grow...just think of the last rep, are you pushing it till failure and are you sweating? Its like saying muscle weighs more than fat...which is not even logically plausible if you actually think about the statement.
The perfect number of repetitions or rather, the perfect amount of time under load that is effective for optimal muscle growth, depends on a person neurological efficiency .
This will also vary's from muscle group to muscle group for that person.
Usually this falls between 40 seconds and 90 seconds.
The key is how efficiently that persons recruits motor units, low efficiency = greater time needed, high efficiency = less time needed.
awesome powerpoint
dogzer 1 month ago
Wow, thank you, it was clear as mud :D
samuils 10 months ago
You don't even need science to prove that last finding. It makes logical sense, you just have to get the overload and pump in your muscles and they'll grow...just think of the last rep, are you pushing it till failure and are you sweating? Its like saying muscle weighs more than fat...which is not even logically plausible if you actually think about the statement.
illnastic 11 months ago
The perfect number of repetitions or rather, the perfect amount of time under load that is effective for optimal muscle growth, depends on a person neurological efficiency .
This will also vary's from muscle group to muscle group for that person.
Usually this falls between 40 seconds and 90 seconds.
The key is how efficiently that persons recruits motor units, low efficiency = greater time needed, high efficiency = less time needed.
Debunking the pseudo debunkers.
MrAudity 1 year ago