Added: 4 years ago
From: iamsam212
Views: 6,829
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I wish people would stop saying Jason did it.

    Jason did not do it; it was OJ.

  • @meginmd That's right. Don't bother with all the evidence that shows it was Jason.

  • @Exiles800 No, it's more like, "All the people who say Jason did it are disregarding every single piece of evidence that points to OJ as the killer because they refuse to believe anything that doesn't support their theory."

  • @meginmd You can either answer Bill Dear's evidence or you can't. Dear's evidence is pretty convincing it was Jason and OJ covered for him because it was his son.

  • @Exiles800 ...or I could live in the real world where OJ did it. Again with the "ignoring all the evidence that says OJ did it" thing.

  • @meginmd No. You haven't answered Dear's evidence - which means you're in contempt of it. You can't get away with ignoring Dear's evidence, and your input is teen-like and juvenile. You have to do better than that. Have you even seen Dear's evidence?

  • @Exiles800 I don't even know who Dear is or what his evidence is. I know that it's bullshit though.

    If Jason did it, where's the DNA evidence? Only OJ's DNA was found at the scene. Lots of fiber, blood, etc... evidence links OJ to the crime.

    I'm sorry that you are in denial.

  • @meginmd I figured. Try learning about Dear's evidence before you dismiss it. When you go fact by fact no one can refute it.

  • @Exiles800 What did Mr Dear find of Jasons at the murders scene?

  • @mjmitch33 Is Jason the same dna map of blood as OJ?

  • @mjmitch33  His wool cap.

  • @Exiles800 The wool cap with OJ's hair in it? lol Someone is fooled!

  • @mjmitch33 Why would OJ be wearing Jason's wool watchcap? When did OJ borrow it? Face it, you're in contempt of the obvious. You haven't explained how Jason's black watchcap ended-up next to Ron Goldman's bloody body?

  • @Exiles800 That is because you have not shown that is Jasons watchcap. The watchcap found only one type of hair in it all matching the microscopic characteristics of one OJ Simpson. Remember the receipt from the disquise OJ purchased two weeks earlier was entered into evidence. lol You dumb people are so fooled by these videos you forget the actual testimony of the case. Or at least try to do so. Pathetic!

  • @mj33 Bullshit. Dear showed photos from Jason's possessions of him wearing that watchcap up to the date of the killing and then never being seen wearing it in any photos after the killing. After the killing he got a new grey watchcap. There were hairs found elswhere. Speaking of dumb, do you remember the secret witness who saw a 'hispanic' running from the walkway? Jason looks an awful lot like a dark-skinned hispanic. That was Jason. And we know it wasn't OJ. You're ignoring the other evidence.

  • @Exiles800 Do you remember why that lady never testified. Because even the Rags that interviewed her for her story realized she was a total moron,had no idea what she was talking about,had several pending lawsuits that also had no merit and she was illegal. lol Your right though I am sure we can trust her more than dna and the three testing facilities that tested dozens of blood samples from the murder scene,the Bronco and OJ's home and all came back with the same dna map. OJ

  • @mjmitch33 You give yourself away because you use too much slander and smearing to try to defame that witness. Meanwhile you've written nothing to show that she didn't see Jason sprinting out of the walkway - which she did. You protest too much. The blood samples came back with much more than DNA, they came back with a blood preservative that could only have come from the LAPD lab. There was evidence blood was planted. Meanwhile you ignore all the evidence Dear found that Jason was there.

  • @Exiles800 Why was she not called? How did you find out about her? Two of the blood samples out of roughly twenty samples came back with edta. Those two samples had trace chemicals that could have been from edta but the FBI testified and showed test that the amount of edta found was 1000 times less than preserved blood. Remember? Do you know the defense never argued once that the blood at the scene was planted? They could not since 13 officers seen it and it came back clean.

  • @mjmitch33 OJ could have cut his hand after confronting Jason who was blind with rage. Very likely the source of the blood. She wasn't called because her testimony cast doubt on the prosecutions case. Perhaps the defense thought the sleazy character defamation practices you used here would have worked against them.

  • @Exiles800 The knife wounds were fairly bland if you recall the actual evidence. It was a 4 inch bladed knife with a few stab wounds going 5 inches in based on compression and angle of entry. That could be so many types of knives it would be real easy to say anyone owned one. All of Dears evidence is invented and rumor or shit he created to sell this shit online. I do not expect your ignorant ass to admit it but I am sure going to laugh at your dumb ass for believing it. lol

  • @mjmitch33 You forgot to mention Nicole had wounds in her scalp identical to the butt knob on Jason's knife. Dear surmised Jason knocked Nicole out with the butt of the knife and then went back to cut her throat deeply after realizing she witnessed him murder Ron Goldman. This fits the forensics you moronically ignore.

  • @Exiles800 And Dear knows this how? He never seen the body... your fucking gullible. You would believe anything this clown says and all his writing is what he hoped he could prove. He had no access to the crime scene,he had no access to the bodies. Do you know how hard it is to confirm a bruise matches a weapon without seeing the body. lol OMG your making me laugh hard. This fits the forensics? What forensics? Dear never had access. wow

  • @Exiles800 Dear Surmised? How do you do that? Nicole had a bruise on her head where she was knocked out. Forensics and the medical examiner told us that. They never told us it matched any knife and the only person we know outside of Ron that was around something sharp that night at the scene was OJ. We know that since he left a blood trail. Jason was with his girlfriend who testified to that twice. She didn't change her story until Mr Dear paid her to help sell books. Wake up monkey@

  • @Exiles800 So what makes MR Dear make sure he is telling the truth? Who has something to gain by the conspiracy? Can Mr Dear get in trouble for lying about this case? Answers are... We do not know he is telling the truth about anything since he is not under oath and no one cares what he thinks. Mr Dear has everything to gain by the conspiracy he is INVENTING because if one out of every 5 morons visits this site or buys his book/video he makes cash.

  • @mjmitch33 Typical of an evidence denier, you step back and use cheezy sophistry in front of obvious evidence you can't admit. If we discuss Dear's evidence directly we can see Jason had the violent background and psychological disturbance as well as motive. He lied about the time he left work and his punch card was forged. His alibi of being at his girlfriend's was disproven. You have balls because you haven't disproven anything Dear said. Meanwhile your boy Jason was caught doing the inventing

  • @mjmitch33 Very weak. You haven't come close to addressing Dear's evidence. Trash talk is no substitute for good argument, evidence, or reasoning.

  • @Exiles800 Can you admit this for me. Nothing Mr Dear tells you in this book or video is confirmed by anyone under oath and that the conspiracy that he is building for you only makes him a profit and nothing else?

  • @mjmitch33 You really have nothing other than smearing Dear do you?

  • @Exiles800 I will continue to remind people of the actual evidence in this case and continue to call out Mr Dear on profiting over a murder by blaming the innocent. He is a joke and as long as he is on youtube I will continue to tell the real story. He doesn't like it he can call me my name and number can be gotten very easily. I have no trouble calling him out in person.

  • @Exiles800 There is no evidence Jason was at the scene...

  • @Exiles800 Your putting more belief in these people that were paid to change their stories after testifying to help sell a book. your very gullible would you like to buy a bridge or a island in Dubaii?

  • @mjmitch33 Watch Bill Dear's video pal...

  • @Exiles800 I have watched this trash. I am smart enough to see it for what it is. I money making scam probably backed by OJ to make money for his children. For the last time. No dna or anything else ties anyone but OJ to the murders. No one!

  • @mjmitch33 And your total avoidance of Dear's irrefutable proof really helps your credibility. You're a little ignorant because LAPD said it found DNA other than OJ's but declined getting any DNA samples from Jason when asked. Jason's cap was found next to Goldman's bloody body. LAPD said it found hair belonging to someone else. Darden said the wrong Simpson was prosecuted. You lose. You haven't come anywhere near honestly addressing Dear's evidence.

  • @Exiles800 Actually all 26 hairs found is said watchcap were matched to one person, OJ. You are really fooled by these videos. I guess Mr Dear has done his job he has taken a unintelligent part of society and educated them with incorrect facts and rumor making his theory sound believable. Not to the ones who know the case though thank god!

  • @mjmitch33 So what happened to Jason's watchcap that Dear proved by photographic evidence was never seen on Jason after the killing? How dare you refer to me as unintelligent. If we go step by step through Dear's evidence we can see what you are incapable of recognizing or even mentioning while using ad hominem to avoid it. Dear's case against Jason is extensive and involves forensic wound-matching to his knife and attempts to wash blood stains from his car in the rain. You're denying evidence.

  • @Exiles800 bahhhaahaaa.. This is easy,the police proved in the original trial OJ purchased items 2 weeks prior to the murders. Fake Mustache, mustache glue and a black sticking cap. A stocking cap was found at the murder scene and the ALL the hairs found in it matched the microscopic characteristics of OJ SIMPSON...

  • @mjmitch33 So what happened to Jason's watchcap? You haven't answered that. Why? Just because OJ buys a stocking cap doesn't mean that isn't Jason's cap. Dear has a photo showing the cap is identical to Jason's which suddenly disappeared and was never seen on Jason again from that night on. Show me a picture of OJ's cap. You can usually get a fake arguer to out himself with a "bahahaha" by making good arguments. Anyone here can see you have avoided answering what happened to Jason's cap.

  • @Exiles800 If we go step by step through the evidence OJ would be in jail for Murder and your morons would feel even more stupid than you sound today. Your watching Youtube trying to solve a murder from years ago. Your forgetting about scientific evidence and believing a dude writing a book and selling videos. If that does not show how ignorant you are then I do not know what does. Begone moron your making the world look more pathetic than it can ever be.

  • @mjmitch33 Rubbish. Your trolling style gives you away. This is your best and Dear has outdone it by a large margin. Like I said, if we went over Dear's case it would show you to be the trolling excuse-maker you are. Dear makes a more than convincing case that you haven't come close to scratching. The fact you can't answer Dear's direct evidence says all you need to know. Anyone can see you are not answering Dear's evidence in any way and therefore don't have any credibility.

  • @Exiles800 Yeah ok, So Jason had a black hat too. So did millions of people that were not with their girlfriend that night. Convincing case... lol Your ignorance is mind numbing. Dear is a money making fraud who is just selling books to jokes such as yourself. Then again the whites of this country are doing exactly what they always have. Feed on your ignorance and in doing so keep you inbedded with anger and suspicion. That is the best way to keep you in your place. Thanks for buying it.

  • @mjmitch33 You forgot to mention what happened to Jason's watchcap after that night? Dear documented in Jason's own photos of himself that he was seen wearing it up to the date of the murder and then had a grey watchcap in photos after that date. You forgot to account for Jason's watchcap. Did he happen to have the same black watchcap as OJ AND lose it that night by coincidence too? You give yourself away in your inability to admit this. And slandering Dear won't get you out of it.

  • @Exiles800 So now we have to document others peoples hats. You are more retarded than any person I have ever argued this case with. Despite a person selling a book telling you that the murderers son lost the same type of hat it still does not take the hair that matched OJ being the only hair in the hat. lol I am amazed at your incompetence. At least I know the type of person on the jury still exist. Are you actually avoiding evolution? lol

  • @Exiles800 LAPD never said it found any other dna accept for dog hair. So I guess the dog and Jason killed them.. lol They did not need Jasons dna since all the blood matched OJ,the hair matched OJ,the fiber from his Bronco was on the glove and Rons shirt, OJ's blood on right glove, ron and nicoles blood in Bronco and on the gloves. Darden never said the wrong Simpson was prosecuted. Where did that come from?

  • @mjmitch33 Darden did say that. The reason your phony evidence against OJ exists is because he went over and found the murder scene after Jason was finished and then helped cover it up for his son. Your assumption it was OJ so therefore there's no need for any credible objective investigation destroys your credibility and shows how much contempt you have for normal police procedure. What part of the knife forensics matching Jason's knife don't you get? Navy knife combat and attitude = Jason.

  • @Exiles800 ok so tell me where I can read that. Show it to me. You are full of shit!

  • YOUR WEBPAGE ISNT THERE

  • The OJ case is a perfect example of the public condemning an innocent person. What is absolutely amazing about this case is the justice system actually worked and an innocent man was found not guilty simply because the evidence didn't uphold a conviction. And this is in a country where black people often get railroaded into the electric chair on the slightest of evidence. The public is simply an ignorable ass. This is a rare case where the law served its purpose - but also where OJ got screwed.

  • @Exiles800 so...does it bother you that OJ was found guilty in the civil court?

    Amazing what happens when you don't have incompetent lawyers.

  • @meginmd Civil courts have a lower standard of evidence. The way to tell that Bill Dear's case is real is that the mainstream media isn't interested in it. The mainstream media is the government in this country, for those who haven't realized it yet.

  • @ pezowenk you fuckin crazy dude

  • People need to stop asking or saying that OJ was "guilty" of murder because a jury of his peers acquitted him on all counts of murder in 1995. However, the facts of the case did not prove his innocence but luckily for us, In America you have to be proven guilty, not innocent, which the prosecution somehow failed to do.

  • oj simpson= killer

    END OF!!

  • oj is guilty it r obious

  • You DO know that Oj DID NOT write the book himself, he is innocent

  • You DO know that OJ's own attorney has came out and admitted that he helped OJ get away with murder right? OJ is guilty.

  • no hes not innocent

  • @wolfgang7445 OJ APPROACHED REGAN ABOUT DOING THE BOOK AND SIGNED OFF ON IT AFTER READING IT BY HIS GHOSTWRITER. OJ TOLD THE GHOSTWRITER WHAT TO WRITE AND HE WROTE IT. OJ READ IT AND SIGNED OFF. GET A CLUE, OJ IS TRYING TO GIVE YOU A CLUE.

  • @wolfgang7445 He recited the book to his ghostwriter Pablo. So while he did not technically write it, it was done with his knowledge and consent. There are details in there only the killer would know.

  • his son jason did it

  • @TranceAddict2088 Jason had nothing to do with these murders. OJ acted alone and killed Ron and Nicole. All the evidence points to him, his actions point to him, the lies since make it even easier to see if you truly want to know who did it. Now if you just side with a race or are a OJ ballhugger you can make silly arguments but science and circumstantial evidence all points to one person. OJ.

  • I recall a comment made by actor JJ Walker,"good times"on the matter in a september/october 1994 national enquirer, Basicly,he said it was irrelivent,if oj was guilty or not,,because the man knows the country will burn from coast to coast if hes convicted.And it WOULD have!

  • All of the evidence points to one person and one person only.DNA, glove, timeline, motive, and loads of evidence that weren't used during the trial. Nicole's character is a moot point. Look at OJ's eyes during his interviews. He looks like a crazy man who is crazy with guilt. He has searched every golf course across America for the real killer but still can't find him. He wrote a book that no man who just lost his wife to murder would write unless he were either crazy or...guilty.

  • OJ didn't do it, and anyone who takes the time to go through the trial and the FACTS will come to the same conclusion. He knows who did it, but he didn't do it. I do not condone Nicole's murder, but lets be honest here, why are people so appalled about the dead of a junkie?

    I'm not black, btw.

  • If anybody here has a brain bigger then a pea then they should know O.J's Son Jason Simpson Did it. Look at the dvd "The Overlooked Suspect" They even found the murder weapon. LAPD is not going to re-open the case though because it will show how dirty they are once again. They wanted him so bad they could have got his son but that wasnt enough. There is a preview of the DVD here on youtube look it up.

  • I've seen it, I also think it was his son Jason. The preview is great.

  • @vanillabuzz He did it. Are you basing your knowledge just on what you've seen on TV?

  • @meginmd No, I've read the full case. I find that the people who believe he did it do base their knowledge on that though. On TV nobody says he was innocent, so how the hell am I going to base my knowledge on that? I've read the case (I'm a criminologist) and he clearly didn't do it.

  • You need to slow down this video. If blacks are too stupid to know OJ was guilty then they sure as hell can't read very fast.

  • if ur guys would know what o j can do, you wouldnt ev en talk shit about him, i always told him that he should let the bitch go and he agreed but u cant just let a bitch take ur money and buy drugs and let some fuckers drive ur ferrari, if that was u would u take that shit and accept it ? i bet u wouldnt so its easy to point and say here the bad guy, fuckin assholes

  • This is a disgusting person a real scumbag. The things in this blog are so powerful. Thank you and keep up the good work.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more