@dodgeball441 They think with time a non-living thing can start to live, a non aware being can start to aware,Information (like DNA) can be formed without intelegence,Animal insects behaviour is in the genes ! an the best is this stuff : /watch?v=dOyc98tV5kA did evolve wings ! and the ability to fly ! throug random mutations and naturel selection, needless to speak about the evolution of plantes ... please hold down to the real science :)
@dodgeball441 Evolution is BULLSHIT!!!!!!!! I can honestly say 100%, with 0 hesitation on my part, disregarding any religious beliefs, that I find evolution flawed and unbelievable.
@tommy35ss I would say that because evolution is so central to the whole of science, to stray away from it is to dismiss science and to dismiss reason. The implication would be that when faced with an important decision with two possible actions, one based on evidence and reason, the other based on an alternate unsupported theory (and justified by the term faith), then that the evidence and reason will be dismissed and action will be taken despite all the evidence to the contrary.
@marmitetruth They hold their religious beliefs as important is all I see. I find the rule of law and not forcing your views upon someone else as much more important than religious beliefs. If the person is for the common good then I feel is doesn't matter. There is a huge debate about Ron Paul on this. Although I believe in evolution, it does not bother me that Ron Paul possibly doesn't because I feel he is the most honest and trustworthy candidate by following the Constitution
Evolution isn't something you can choose to believe or disbelieve. It just is. If you're saying, "I don't believe in evolution," it's tantamount to saying, "I don't believe in the number 4." It simply makes no sense, and has the added benefit of making you sound like a slobbering idiot who should be locked up for his own safety.
No, you're wrong. It's similar to saying 'I don't believe in Newton's understanding of Gravity'. It's nearly certain you are right, but there remains the REMOTE possibility that there are giant tractor beams hidden in the center of the every planet and star in the solar system.
The Number 4 is a concept, and would exist even if the universe was created six seconds ago.
It is a testament to the stupidity of the (American?) readers that your comment has so many positive votes. The theory! of evolution is a theory! You never "believe in" a theory. This would be the death of science. You confound science with religion. The "number 4" is not a theory but a theoretical construct. It would not make any sense to try to prove or disprove that the number 4 exists.
Why on Earth not? General relativity has proven very accurate over the decades. Why should I withhold belief? Or from quantum mechanics, which is at least equally accurate? If a theory is consistent with the data available to us, then I shall believe it is more likely to be true than fundamentally false.
@MrTotila THEORY: the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or methods, as distinguished from its practice: ex. music theory.
The word Theory is sometimes confused with hypothesis. Hypotheses are used in non-technical contexts to mean an untested idea or opinion. A theory in technical use is a more or less verified or established explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena: the theory of relativity. the theory of evolution.
And what has the definition of "theory" to do with my argument?
By the way: the definition you gave is evidently wrong in this context. "Theory" has many meanings, and the one you gave has nothing to do with a "scientific theory" which is an explanation of a phenomena which fulfills certain criteria. But, I say it again, this has nothing to do with my argument.
Any candidate for the highest office in the land, who is therefore seeking more power and responsibility than any other human being ever, who also does not believe in evolution, has DISQUALIFIED themselves from holding such a serious position with such awesome responsibility. We cannot afford to have another religious nut with their finger on the button.
I have been a registered republican since I first registered and my family often chides me for taking questions like this into account when it comes to whether or not I vote for a candidate but I stand by my convictions that I will not vote for someone who thinks the earth is six thousand years old. People that aggressively stupid can't be trusted with power. A president who ignores facts in favor of opinions and ideas is dangerous to everyone he serves. I'd sooner vote for a Democrat.
@TheEpicPwnSauce This is right on. Religion and science aren't at war, science and fabricated stupidity are. And yes, I said fabricated - when Reagan married evangelicals to the Republican party he turned the party into Oroboros, doomed to pander for money to an insane minority with a lot of wealth while pandering to them in public and looking like idiots and - worse yet - allowing people who actually think like them into power. The theology that feeds the GOP also devours their credibility.
Hey, just because Sen. Sam Brownback, Gov. Mike Huckabee and Rep. Tom Tancredo do not believe in eveolution does not give you the right to call them all these mean, uncalled-for names. I mean, I am pretty sure that the only reason you believe in evolution is because you hate God and you hate America. These three good men are good Christians and they happen to be true to their believes, clearly we can't say the same about you. I am actually crying right now , I can't believe the hate. GOD Bless.
@midgetking101 ~ you should only think about what we had after the last "ice age"....we had 'global warming'. In the 1950's these so called progressive "green scientist" were screaming about a coming ice age. Look it up, it was a mass hysteria. Today 'global warming' & 'carbon footprint' is all about passing a worldwide "carbon tax" on every human head so these elite (who would never pay it) can have more constant stream of revenue from the lowly chattel. Al Gore is a snake, believe itﾟ･✿.｡.☆ ツ
@KristosSpark OK, first of all Naruto. Im sure you've heard stuff about the huricanes, floods, and droughts that have been effecting the U.S. i guess this is due to nature getting mad because they have to pay carbon tax.
@midgetking101 ~ It is superstious & silly to think the Diety is using weather to punish us. No, the weather does well on it's own. The environment is larger than the clouds overhead. Our weather is affected even by gamma rays & cosmic energies from space, solar flares, all that. The climate is an enormous thing much greater than the little exhaust from a car or a factory. Volcanoes on ground & under the sea spew trillions of gallons of toxic things into the sky. Earth adjusts. Don't be fooled.
@KristosSpark First of all you asspie i was being sarcastic, youre fuking stupid! solar flares are radiation, same as gamma rays the only effect it can have is pretty lights (aurora) in the northern parts of the world. The radiation particles can some times effect the reception you get on your phone. The last thing it would effect is the weather, in order to be strong enough to effect the weather it would wipe out our entire magnetic field. u moist queef !
@midgetking101 ~ you should understand the "butterfly effect" & the weather related work of work of Edward Lorenz. It is based in chaos theory. Complex systems, such as the weather are difficult to predict past a certain time range (approximately a week in the case of weather), since it is impossible to measure the starting atmospheric conditions completely accurately. This has all been well researched, the "climate change" phoneys know it well. Hold on to your wallet/freedom my friend ツ
it is about human rights. The woman is responsible for the child, it is her responsibility and burden. It must be her choice - the government, whichever, cannot take from her the right to control her own body - that baby is part of her body. Of course, a baby is more than a simple appendage. But it is part of the mother, and therefor comes under her discretion to nurture or to kill - this sounds hard but it is a question of the mothers innate rights.
@mlcollins10 ~ a baby human is not a "burden" or a "choice". It is a person. You devalue human life to buy into such thought, like any atheist communist country ideolology. It is evil & barbaric. You should really rethink it. Today a human can be put into prison for messing with a bald eagles' fetus/embryo egg, but to destroy a human fetus is ok. It is insane & ill-concieved (no pun). The elite, Ted Turner for instance, has 9 children, but advocates "population control". See, that is sickness.
Who cares about evolution? It does nothing to advance my personal growth. It's a big idea competing with other big ideas. It has no prescriptions for personal behaviour so why do so many use it as a social weapon? It certainly doesn't efface ignorance because it has no modes to influence character. As far as it being a fact, well sure, it's a fact like the value of money is a fact; subject to ongoing valuations. Cont'd
@abdallahmarsh 2 - It's not a fact like 'water is made of hydrogen and oxygen' fact and for some to claim otherwise reveals more about their weltanschauung than it does about evolution. Kuhn's paradigm theory comes into play at that point. So again, I say...who cares about evolution. What social capital do you think it gives you exactly?
Thats the smartest thing John McCain has ever said. I have to complement him even though he said it with that John McCain smirk which I can't stand. The rest of them are either ignorant or pandering to the evangelicals.
Ron Paul didn't hear the question or he would have raised his hand. His biggest flaw is his religious beliefs.. he replaces the constitution with his bible wherever they contradict. Wants to ban abortion, yet claims to be a champion for personal freedom and privacy. What about doctor patient privacy and women owning their own body? hypocrite..
Republicans are nothing more than fascist totalitarian racist homophobic religious morons now. They used to stand for something great, not anymore.
@evilsinzy He doesn't want to ban abortion, that is a mischaracterization. He is personally against it but his policy is to let the states handle it because it's not a federal issue. Yes, that does mean overturning Roe v. Wade, but that doesn't mean replacing Roe v. Wade with a different federal law.
correct, its not a federal issue. It's not a state issue either. Its a personal issue. I know his argument of it being an act of violence, but an act of violence against your own body? The woman has a right to control her own body and her fetus is part of her body.
Transferring the power to the state is simply a tactic to ban it, nothing more. Paul wouldn't be fighting to give the states power if abortions were illegal under federal law. He's a hypocrite.
@evilsinzy ~ a fetus is part of her body, but it is somebody else. It just happens to need the sustenance provided by a mother like God's nature intended. To call the fetus just a part of her body, like an arm, mocks any intuitive common sense. Abortion is not the problem, it's a symptom of the problem of ill-conceived (no pun) recreational sex. But once you make it, you got it, both the father & mother. And the father should have say about any abortion. Miscarriage is natural abortion ☮ ♥
I wouldn't call a 12 years old girl impregnated by her father "ill-conceived recreational sex". By your logic, it doesn't matter. Its still an individual and its irrelevant what the mothers situation is.
Or how about the women who was refused a late term abortion despite her body contracting and crushing the fetus in a slow painful death? That sadly happened not long ago.
"God's nature" intended animals to eat us for sustenance, does that mean we shouldn't stop them either?
@evilsinzy ~ of course you are correct about situations where the mother's life is endangered, that could be considered "self-defense" by any rational person. The child concieved in rape or incest is another matter that could very well be resolved by allowing each state to vote and decide concerning an abortion. The States that would outlaw abortion would have to have a system of easy adoption or a well run orphanage paid for by the outlawing taxpayers. Choice prevails. Life is still dignified.
So if a women is raped and pregnant, she can't decide on her own if she wants an abortion, yet the state can? What could possibly make you feel the state should have more control over a women than the women does of herself? Why should the states opinion matter, but not hers? Your collectivist and totalitarian position is disturbing. Are you fanatically religious or something? I know Ron Paul wants to allow states to decide, but thats only to avoid the supreme court ruling.
@evilsinzy ~ no, the State Governments' opinion does not matter, it's the people's opinion that matters. The people decide. That way a "State" or Government cannot be allowed to do routine abortion either. That's exactly the point. Let the people decide what is proper & dignified for our human selves. NOT a STATE. But each State should have right to vote upon it. Thereby allowing it in some, not others, but it would NEVER be supreme law everywhere. Eugenics Sux, get it?? :)
In your democratic style of personal freedom, a crackhead and a dropout working the drive-through window have twice the say as the pregnant women does. But we don't have a democracy! We have a Republic. You don't belong to the majority. America isn't a club, this is the land of the free, free from the majority of totalitarian moralists and religious authoritarians trying to control other peoples lives. Women will not be enslaved by your religious beliefs as long as freedom rings.
@evilsinzy ~ dang brother....and I don't have a clue about your drive through comment, what's a crackhead & dropout have to do with it?? And women run EVERYTHING, so I don't know what your beef is my friend, ain't nobody gonna get enslaved, ha crazy....
You are just repeating slanderous talking points. Go to Ron Paul's website and read his actual positions on these issues. Just a hint: He is personally against abortion but is for the right of states to allow abortion. He thinks (as I do) that evolution is not something you have to "believe in", but a theory, and that the government has no business declaring any theory as "The Truth". In science, theories continuously evolve and often are revised.
"Slanderous talking points" my ass. Ron only wants to shift the power to the states because the supreme courts have already ruled for a women's choice.
He said he doesn't think there is proof for evolution. How can we trust the man's judgement when he accepts a fairytale of a woman made from the rib of a man made from dust over empirical evidence?
You don't have to believe the theory of gravity to know to not jump off a cliff. Evolution exists like gravity exists.
Most scientist and Nobel price laureates are Christians and many of them believe the "fairytale" in the bible. Are they all idiots?
Gravity is something you can see and test in experiments. There is no way to see or test/replicate evolution, because this is a process which extends over millions of years. You can only study fossils and observe wildlife etc and then make educated guesses as to how this process might have led to the development of life.
As to Ron Paul's intentions regarding the shift of power to the states: if you had followed my advice and read about him then you would know that this is not an evil ploy but a fundamental part of his philosophy: he wants to decentralize power away from the federal government as far down to the people as possible. The central government should only be responsible for the tasks that are given to it by the constitution: basically defense and upholding the law.
One canard that is often stated by the creationist crowd is "If man descended from apes, then why are there still apes?" This statement demonstrates an appalling ignorance of the entire science of biology. NO ONE believes that humans descended from the apes that are alive today. Rather, they believe that both descended from a more generalized ancestor that lived millions of years ago.
Is it just me that finds it disturbing that the most powerful country on earth is one of the least democratic 'democracies' in the world and is run by people who refuse to accept the masses of evidence presented before them (not all of them mind)?
it doesnt really matter that they are creationists they are not less intelligent because of it since its all because of religious indoctrination and they can still be able to become good presidents.
This is idiocracy at its best! Things like religion should have no place in the values of becoming president. Americas politics is turning into a religious feud. The presidency is beginning to be represented as a religious figure and statement. It sickens me...
I like how "ape-man believers" that blindingly accept magical mutation theory as their RELIGION think anyone that doesnt "believe" in the pitiful pseudo-science of evolution is a "creationist" haha.
There are tons of atheists, agnostics, and gnostics that dont buy that evolution fairytale.
Its the most outdated, nonsensical fail of a theory to ever be mislabeled as "science"
Darwinian theory and Neo-Darwinism is a DISGRACE to real science in every way.
Yeah, not surprising. Huckabee even deletes contrarian comments on his "evolution" YT videos. (watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA) Way to stand up for free speech there, Mike.
Belief in Evolution is a religious dogma, it is not based on science. Evolution is based on the ASSUMPTION that all living things have a common ancestor. Science is not based on assumptions.
People who doesn't believe in science have no place in the white house.
Our society is based on science, and evolution is the best model thus far that explains the biological nature of every creature. Biology make no sense without evolution, and evolution have been proven and is able to be observed through rapid evolving micro-organisms.
Science is the future, and to deny science is to deny the US a future.
@Neosaigo I'm an atheist and I totally believe in evolution but I wouldn't go so far as to say that biology makes no sense without the theory of evolution. It certainly helps a lot but there have been plenty of advancements made in all areas of science (including biology) unrelated to anything in terms of the theory of evolution. Let's not overstate our case, fellow atheist/evolutionists, it only helps the morons who want to discredit us!
@midgetking101 ~ NASA has be hijacked by some people who will not allow us the taxpayers who fund it to see all the information & data that is being collected in outer space. For some reason, deep space "secrets" are classified from us little people. It did not start out this way. The NASA agereement was got to see it all. Someone has changed the game. We should rethink the billions spent on NASA. They may be making antigravity TR-3B's UN police cars to come collect you, ey?? :) FEMA Camp.
@KristosSpark Um... i dont know where you get your information form. NASA is a public agency, any one who is a scientists has access to anything NASA is working on, this ranges from using the hubble telescope, to using their vacuum chambers, or even using their wind tunnels. so what youre saying cant be true... its like saying that the "public" library is creating secret books and placing them on their shelves for all to see. it doesnt makes sence
I can test gravity every time I jump in the air. I, or anyone else, have never seen a species turn into another, MORE ADVANCED species through generations of breeding.
@spacewolf5462 Get to know the theory. It states that through refinement the species change, adapt and become more advanced. Thats how 1 piece of matter turned into our whole bodies and all the cosmos according to those beliefs.
@BibleIsland, "Get to know the theory. It states that through refinement the species change, adapt and become more advanced"
I'm sorry but your the one lacking in the understanding of the theory. Things don't become more "advanced", they become better acclimated to their environment. While this can lead them to become more complex, it doesn't necessitate it.
"Thats how 1 piece of matter turned into our whole bodies and all the cosmos "
again you demonstrate how little you actually know.
@BibleIsland Well, yes, speciation has been observed before whether you've seen it or not but on that note...
I'VE NEVER SEEN THE "GERMS" OF THESE DISEASES WITH MY OWN EYES! THE BIBLE IS RIGHT, DISEASES ARE CAUSED BY DEMONS! DOWN WITH GERM THEORY!!! GERMS CAN'T BE SEEN BY THE NAKED EYE? HOOOOOOOW CONVEINENT!
I look at the structure of the molecule, which is formed by at LEAST 2 atoms, which has it's OWN complex structure as well as DNA and the function of synapses and the ONLY reasonable conclusion I can come to is this;
These COMPLEX functions of these complex organisms could have NOT come about by mere chance!
It takes INCREDIBLE intelligence to understand their function, and I believe a PROFOUNDLY intelligent Person to have made these incredibly complex structures! His name IS Jehovah God!
@DrinkSkateSleep How UNWISE it is to believe the complexity of the synapses came from MERE CHANCE! I look at the branch chain of amino acids and how they work together for instance helping a body builder build muscle mass, and I MARVEL how well they work together along with hard work to make strong men stronger!
I look at the BEAUTIFUL complexity of differences between humans around the world and I see God's image in each of us!
I see the genius of creation, NOT the vagueness of evolution!
@DrinkSkateSleep And yet many thousands of years later, mankind has only reached the level where he's just really beginning to simply UNDERSTAND how DNA and atoms fully function.
It just amazes me how some people THINK they know so much, they think somehow there is wisdom in the denial of God. The supernatural events I can attest to CANNOT be dispelled by psychiatric theories. My God is a force greater than gravity, a power I need NOT see to know how real He is!
@ucandrinkmytea If you honsetly believe that your god is stronger than gravity, then jump off a cliff,ask him to save you and see what happens. There is plenty of wisdom in the 'denial of god' as there is no objective, physical evidence to suggest that a god exists; mankind can only attain knowledge through evidence. Yes, there is a lot we still don't know, but that does not mean you can fill in the blanks with whatever bullshit seems plausible to you.
There are plenty of right wing atheists and right wing rational thinkers who accept evolution. This problem is a problem of certain pious religious people regardless of their politics.
Right wingers want to have it both ways. They want all the technological goodies that science can deliver but despise real science, especially when it challenges their knee jerk fairy tales and indoctrination
i'll second that! get that whole green bank idea back or at least have the Fed not lead money to the gov with interest. if the Fed is truely a part of the government why the hell does it lend money to the government with interest attached?
@xn117 Well some of them may believe in Intelligent falling t(x)/t(x): Cor 1:2 (some evangelical believe that falling is not the cause of gravity but the intelligence of god)
Sorry to all those indoctrinated into religion. It's not your fault. Only be thankful we figured it out in our lifetime. Atleast you don't have to die ignorant, wether you accept it or not.
Just think of the neanderthals and what they went through every day, every year, for thousands of years. It's amazing.
@duelmaster742 I think that actually shows some bravery... I think, during his hesitation, he was thinking, "I'm going to lose some evangelical and creationist votes but I can't say I don't accept evolution and retain my self respect!"
I thought McCain was a bit of a joke in the '08 election but fair play to him for not selling his soul (figuratively speaking, of course) to appeal to creationist morons.
how can the CONSERVATIVES not believe in evolution ... just look at GWBush and Barack Obama and you see that there was evolution. One is a dumb monkey who had to buy his way through Harvard MBA, thus running us into a great deficit and great depression...the other might be black but he got into harvard and graduated magna cum laude.
Fucking caveman. He believes in what is just a creation myth from ancient Jewish mythology over the collected knowledge of 200 years of painstaking research and knowledge from expert scientists. This man is DANGEROUS. All the world's experts are wrong and Huckabee's right??? Guess what ... the Celts had a creation story, as did the Romans, Greeks, Persians etc etc etc ... and they're all wrong. So is the one in the Old Testament. Fucking fairy tales. And he could be president of America. SAD.
Der did you just say that being some what smrt, awe hell I will go so farrr as to say dat reasonerable and/or rationeral and stuffs has nothing to do with run'n. Ok man talking like an idiot at your level is hard. Intelligence and rationality in regards to policy is mandatory for a candidate. If you do not believe in something as simple in concept (while complicated in process) which the majority of rational and intelligent humans do... you most likely are not qualified for office. YER!
i really doubt any of those 3 actually didnt believe in evolution. they were probably just saying they did to try to get the creationist vote (58% of the US population is creationist). if you watch the whole thing, when mike huckabee is asked to elaborate hes very careful as to what he says to make sure he isnt ignorant.
I have to say, considering his constituents, it was surprisingly brave to answer yes to that. I don't agree with him at all politically, but it's good to know he's at least a little sane.
@DanTheeMan You honestly think any of these candidates follow agendas laid out to them by their "party". Do you honestly think "parties" even exist outside of voters' minds? The party system is a game and once you realize that, THEN you can play along and have some fun. Until then, you're just one of many cattle being told that Republicans are evil and Democrats are good. They're all PEOPLE trying to gain control over YOU. Wake up.
Good news then, it's still a theory, still a fact, and you still don't know how we got here. But I do, and so does everyone else. So we can all be happy there.
The tards are the clowns that didn't raise their hands. How can anybody believe in that evolution crap? Oh wait .... there was an explosion at the chemical plant down the road ... let's go see what it created!!!
@drummer0529 You misunderstand the word "theory". a scientific theory has nothing to do with an everyday "theory", which is merely equivalent to a hypothesis. A scientific theory is a vast body of knowledge, facts, and laws which have been observed and deduced, and widely accepted among the scientific community has being valid, in that they make good predictions (note here, science makes predictictions, it doesn't give you the truth). Evolution is a scientific theory, and one of our best.
July 7, 09 the Piltdown Pope personally delivered an ecclesiastic letter to the G8 Conference directing them to gather the Nations of the earth & appoint a single Moral authority as Dictator (Anti-Christ). The press opted to cover M Jackson funeral. The Pope/Vatican affirmation of evolution heralded, as an outward invitation to heal the division, is a direct EVIL DENUNCIATION OF GOD & THE HOLY BIBLE. Evolutionists got an invitation to the Catholic Anti-Christian Church, they can't refuse.
Fundamental Logic 101. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice), inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility, breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error, proving themself fundamentally a liar and a fraud. When Atheists dismiss the possibility of God, they breach their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity, to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
@waketheoblivious - As previously mentioned, there are many many transitional fossils, you just fail to acnowledge them, instead chosing to shift the goal posts so that they dont fit into your definition of transitional. The 2 most commony mentioned are of course Ida and Tiktaalik. We are lucky to have any at all considering the conditions needed to become a fossil. "Atheist/Satanist = Evil Godforsaken Nazis" = Fuck you and your death cult. Hitler/Nazi's were Roman Catholic you fucking douche.
Look, it is fundamental logic and simple. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error proving the person fundamentally a liar and a fraud. When an Atheist dismisses the possibility of God, they breached their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
@waketheoblivious - Surely you must be aware, that their is more evidence to support the theory of evolution than there is say for instance, relativity, gravity and any other scientific theory.
And how the hell do you come to the conclusion that atheist = satanist. Dude how can you be a satanist if you don't believe in satan?
- A legitimate "Missing Link" is an Intergrading Animal Form, intermediate between the major groups of Phyla.
- Exactly what Piltdown Man was designed and planted to accomplish before finally revealed as a Hoax.
- Without a legitimate "missing link", Evolution has NEVER provided the "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as fact. An Evil Illusion, amounting to a Hoax sustained by a series of diabolical frauds, presented as the "missing link".
@waketheoblivious - I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews I am fighting for the Lord's work.
- Adolf Hitler, Speech, Reichstag, 1936
We were convinced that the people need and require this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.
- Adolf Hitler, Speech in Berlin, October 24, 1933
@Hardysamnin <-----Satanic Nazi Genocidal Maniac. Hitler was Satanic. He met with Aleister Crowley who directed him to fulfill "Lams" demand for tribute. A Crowley channeled "Lam" and wrote the "Book of Law" in 3 while in a trance state. Crowley was in the same Satanic cult as Alan Parson (rocket science). Together they were highly publicized for Satanic Sex rituals. On the trip to Europe to meet with Hitler, Crowley fathered a daughter, Barbara Bush.
@waketheoblivious - The Nazi belt buckle had the phrase "In God we trust" on it. All you have to do is read mein kampf to find out the true nature of his faith. Unless of course you are suggesting that's just a smoke screen to blame the Christian faith?
Either way you are delusional.
God is man made.
And if he is in fact real, he is a cunt, just like you. And speaking of genocidal, who is the most genocidal person in the bible. God = millions. Satan = less than 20.
Master of Deception, didn't get the title for half-assed lies.
- What is the Jesuit 5th Oath and why were the Jesuits kicked out of every Country in Europe before finding refuge in America?
- How did they get back into the Vatican, after having been banned. Answer, they aren't Christian, they are Satanic. They further corrupted the Vatican. Piltdown Pope, walks around with a bent wooden Crucifix used in WitchCraft/Satanic Rituals, to publicly mock Jesus Christ.
The social science of Economics, we find God. If Adam Smith had used the term God instead of "invisible hand", today we would be asking who was Adam Smith. The principle of self interest, helps determine the Laws of Supply & Demand. Natural Laws like gravity and can not be denied. Pitted against itself, in a free market self interest generates ABUNDANCE. Conversely, in controlled markets is guarantys SCARCITY & SHORTAGES. Born Capitalists, out of self interest we take our first breath.
You proved your Satan's little helper. You claim to be a plumber's helper, yet apparently haven't figured out shit flows downhill?
The number of Satanic Nazi Shills camping these Atheist/Evolutionist videos is like a mother hen nurturing the oblivious, to adopt their Godforsaken lifestyle.
"Honorable science has had a positive contribution to society"
honorable science is responsible for uncovering every single bit of understanding we have about reality..not just positivie contributions, but UNDERSTANDING of how nature works..the same goes for evolution, but because evolution in particular challenges your faith, u deny it..it's so very weak-minded of u..is tectonic plate theory from satanists?..is the theory of gravity from satanists?
@itzahazylife <---- Pathetic blatantly obvious Satanic Nazi Shill who is clueless on Evolution. Doesn't know a transitional fossil from a missing link.
Then produce a legitimate "missing link" or STFU and quit making an ass our of yourself as a Satanic Nazi Shill who submits transitional fossils as the missing link. What a crock of shit.
Ron Paul doesn't beleive in evolution either! He even said after this that he didn't understand the question.
Koonartio 5 days ago
Those three idiots should be ashamed of themselves and there is a good argument for them to be neutered too!! Donkeys!!!
TheIrishAreTheBest 2 weeks ago
Sen. Gov. Rep. — Collect all four (4. President.)!
Alfred0047 2 weeks ago
Evolution breaks down scientifically at every turn, it takes a great deal of faith to believe in it.
I believe in true science. With logic and reason and data. Evolution is just a religion
dodgeball441 4 weeks ago
@dodgeball441 They think with time a non-living thing can start to live, a non aware being can start to aware,Information (like DNA) can be formed without intelegence,Animal insects behaviour is in the genes ! an the best is this stuff : /watch?v=dOyc98tV5kA did evolve wings ! and the ability to fly ! throug random mutations and naturel selection, needless to speak about the evolution of plantes ... please hold down to the real science :)
YamiYami17 3 weeks ago
@YamiYami17 no it happened once then natural selection kicked in... you obviously don't understand what evolution is...
doolittlesy1 1 day ago
@dodgeball441
well then I say to you that you don't know science
OptimalElement 2 weeks ago
@dodgeball441
Idiots like you are fucking up my country and I don't like it.
bigfilmhat 2 weeks ago
@dodgeball441 Evolution is BULLSHIT!!!!!!!! I can honestly say 100%, with 0 hesitation on my part, disregarding any religious beliefs, that I find evolution flawed and unbelievable.
Koonartio 5 days ago
I personally feel that if they're a good leader it doesn't matter
tommy35ss 1 month ago
@tommy35ss I would say that because evolution is so central to the whole of science, to stray away from it is to dismiss science and to dismiss reason. The implication would be that when faced with an important decision with two possible actions, one based on evidence and reason, the other based on an alternate unsupported theory (and justified by the term faith), then that the evidence and reason will be dismissed and action will be taken despite all the evidence to the contrary.
marmitetruth 1 month ago
@marmitetruth They hold their religious beliefs as important is all I see. I find the rule of law and not forcing your views upon someone else as much more important than religious beliefs. If the person is for the common good then I feel is doesn't matter. There is a huge debate about Ron Paul on this. Although I believe in evolution, it does not bother me that Ron Paul possibly doesn't because I feel he is the most honest and trustworthy candidate by following the Constitution
tommy35ss 1 month ago
Endogenous Retroviruses. nuff said.
mouthyweasel 1 month ago
Evolution isn't something you can choose to believe or disbelieve. It just is. If you're saying, "I don't believe in evolution," it's tantamount to saying, "I don't believe in the number 4." It simply makes no sense, and has the added benefit of making you sound like a slobbering idiot who should be locked up for his own safety.
mouthyweasel 1 month ago 17
@mouthyweasel
No, you're wrong. It's similar to saying 'I don't believe in Newton's understanding of Gravity'. It's nearly certain you are right, but there remains the REMOTE possibility that there are giant tractor beams hidden in the center of the every planet and star in the solar system.
The Number 4 is a concept, and would exist even if the universe was created six seconds ago.
Cheeso33 1 month ago
@mouthyweasel
It is a testament to the stupidity of the (American?) readers that your comment has so many positive votes. The theory! of evolution is a theory! You never "believe in" a theory. This would be the death of science. You confound science with religion. The "number 4" is not a theory but a theoretical construct. It would not make any sense to try to prove or disprove that the number 4 exists.
MrTotila 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrTotila
« The theory! of evolution is a theory! »
And it will, like every other theory in science, always remain a theory. What's your point?
MrGralgrathor 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrTotila
« You never "believe in" a theory »
Why on Earth not? General relativity has proven very accurate over the decades. Why should I withhold belief? Or from quantum mechanics, which is at least equally accurate? If a theory is consistent with the data available to us, then I shall believe it is more likely to be true than fundamentally false.
MrGralgrathor 1 month ago
@MrTotila THEORY: the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or methods, as distinguished from its practice: ex. music theory.
The word Theory is sometimes confused with hypothesis. Hypotheses are used in non-technical contexts to mean an untested idea or opinion. A theory in technical use is a more or less verified or established explanation accounting for known facts or phenomena: the theory of relativity. the theory of evolution.
mouthyweasel 1 month ago
@mouthyweasel
And what has the definition of "theory" to do with my argument?
By the way: the definition you gave is evidently wrong in this context. "Theory" has many meanings, and the one you gave has nothing to do with a "scientific theory" which is an explanation of a phenomena which fulfills certain criteria. But, I say it again, this has nothing to do with my argument.
MrTotila 1 month ago
@MrTotila Go away, dimwit.
mouthyweasel 1 month ago
Any candidate for the highest office in the land, who is therefore seeking more power and responsibility than any other human being ever, who also does not believe in evolution, has DISQUALIFIED themselves from holding such a serious position with such awesome responsibility. We cannot afford to have another religious nut with their finger on the button.
DandAinTac 1 month ago 6
I have been a registered republican since I first registered and my family often chides me for taking questions like this into account when it comes to whether or not I vote for a candidate but I stand by my convictions that I will not vote for someone who thinks the earth is six thousand years old. People that aggressively stupid can't be trusted with power. A president who ignores facts in favor of opinions and ideas is dangerous to everyone he serves. I'd sooner vote for a Democrat.
Cajaquarius 2 months ago
"There is no theory of evolution. Just a list of creatures Chuck Norris has allowed to live".
monkeylard35 2 months ago
nowhere in the bible does god say evolution has not happened. SCIENCE AND RELIGION WOULD GET ALONG IF IT WERE NOT FOR YOU CRAZY ASS EXTREMISTS.
TheEpicPwnSauce 3 months ago
@TheEpicPwnSauce This is right on. Religion and science aren't at war, science and fabricated stupidity are. And yes, I said fabricated - when Reagan married evangelicals to the Republican party he turned the party into Oroboros, doomed to pander for money to an insane minority with a lot of wealth while pandering to them in public and looking like idiots and - worse yet - allowing people who actually think like them into power. The theology that feeds the GOP also devours their credibility.
Cajaquarius 2 months ago
Hey, just because Sen. Sam Brownback, Gov. Mike Huckabee and Rep. Tom Tancredo do not believe in eveolution does not give you the right to call them all these mean, uncalled-for names. I mean, I am pretty sure that the only reason you believe in evolution is because you hate God and you hate America. These three good men are good Christians and they happen to be true to their believes, clearly we can't say the same about you. I am actually crying right now , I can't believe the hate. GOD Bless.
orvgg 3 months ago
this is almost as bad as not believing in global warming
midgetking101 3 months ago
@midgetking101 ~ you should only think about what we had after the last "ice age"....we had 'global warming'. In the 1950's these so called progressive "green scientist" were screaming about a coming ice age. Look it up, it was a mass hysteria. Today 'global warming' & 'carbon footprint' is all about passing a worldwide "carbon tax" on every human head so these elite (who would never pay it) can have more constant stream of revenue from the lowly chattel. Al Gore is a snake, believe itﾟ･✿.｡.☆ ツ
KristosSpark 3 months ago
@KristosSpark OK, first of all Naruto. Im sure you've heard stuff about the huricanes, floods, and droughts that have been effecting the U.S. i guess this is due to nature getting mad because they have to pay carbon tax.
midgetking101 3 months ago
@midgetking101 ~ It is superstious & silly to think the Diety is using weather to punish us. No, the weather does well on it's own. The environment is larger than the clouds overhead. Our weather is affected even by gamma rays & cosmic energies from space, solar flares, all that. The climate is an enormous thing much greater than the little exhaust from a car or a factory. Volcanoes on ground & under the sea spew trillions of gallons of toxic things into the sky. Earth adjusts. Don't be fooled.
KristosSpark 3 months ago
@KristosSpark First of all you asspie i was being sarcastic, youre fuking stupid! solar flares are radiation, same as gamma rays the only effect it can have is pretty lights (aurora) in the northern parts of the world. The radiation particles can some times effect the reception you get on your phone. The last thing it would effect is the weather, in order to be strong enough to effect the weather it would wipe out our entire magnetic field. u moist queef !
midgetking101 3 months ago
@midgetking101 ~ you should understand the "butterfly effect" & the weather related work of work of Edward Lorenz. It is based in chaos theory. Complex systems, such as the weather are difficult to predict past a certain time range (approximately a week in the case of weather), since it is impossible to measure the starting atmospheric conditions completely accurately. This has all been well researched, the "climate change" phoneys know it well. Hold on to your wallet/freedom my friend ツ
KristosSpark 3 months ago
I was amazed when he said yes, I almost began to have respect for him...
OptimalElement 3 months ago
it is about human rights. The woman is responsible for the child, it is her responsibility and burden. It must be her choice - the government, whichever, cannot take from her the right to control her own body - that baby is part of her body. Of course, a baby is more than a simple appendage. But it is part of the mother, and therefor comes under her discretion to nurture or to kill - this sounds hard but it is a question of the mothers innate rights.
mlcollins10 3 months ago
@mlcollins10 ~ a baby human is not a "burden" or a "choice". It is a person. You devalue human life to buy into such thought, like any atheist communist country ideolology. It is evil & barbaric. You should really rethink it. Today a human can be put into prison for messing with a bald eagles' fetus/embryo egg, but to destroy a human fetus is ok. It is insane & ill-concieved (no pun). The elite, Ted Turner for instance, has 9 children, but advocates "population control". See, that is sickness.
KristosSpark 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Evolution is an absolute disgrace to science.
Objects never order anything, mutations never order anything and natural selection will only select what has already been ordered.
Evolution is so irrational that it should be removed from all classrooms.
watch?v=HoKVVYJ8KJM
JungleJargon 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Who cares about evolution? It does nothing to advance my personal growth. It's a big idea competing with other big ideas. It has no prescriptions for personal behaviour so why do so many use it as a social weapon? It certainly doesn't efface ignorance because it has no modes to influence character. As far as it being a fact, well sure, it's a fact like the value of money is a fact; subject to ongoing valuations. Cont'd
abdallahmarsh 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@abdallahmarsh 2 - It's not a fact like 'water is made of hydrogen and oxygen' fact and for some to claim otherwise reveals more about their weltanschauung than it does about evolution. Kuhn's paradigm theory comes into play at that point. So again, I say...who cares about evolution. What social capital do you think it gives you exactly?
abdallahmarsh 3 months ago
LOL untintentional comedy!
TheHuntress144 4 months ago
McCain said yes? Well, maybe he's not as completely stupid as I thought he was.
DrEvolutionQuest 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Civilization will not attain perfection until the last stone from the last church falls on the last priest." . - Émile François Zola
mouthyweasel 4 months ago 2
Thats the smartest thing John McCain has ever said. I have to complement him even though he said it with that John McCain smirk which I can't stand. The rest of them are either ignorant or pandering to the evangelicals.
baxtar1963 4 months ago
Ron Paul didn't hear the question or he would have raised his hand. His biggest flaw is his religious beliefs.. he replaces the constitution with his bible wherever they contradict. Wants to ban abortion, yet claims to be a champion for personal freedom and privacy. What about doctor patient privacy and women owning their own body? hypocrite..
Republicans are nothing more than fascist totalitarian racist homophobic religious morons now. They used to stand for something great, not anymore.
evilsinzy 4 months ago
@evilsinzy He doesn't want to ban abortion, that is a mischaracterization. He is personally against it but his policy is to let the states handle it because it's not a federal issue. Yes, that does mean overturning Roe v. Wade, but that doesn't mean replacing Roe v. Wade with a different federal law.
psycobetabuckdown 4 months ago
I'm not pro-abortion, just pro-rights
correct, its not a federal issue. It's not a state issue either. Its a personal issue. I know his argument of it being an act of violence, but an act of violence against your own body? The woman has a right to control her own body and her fetus is part of her body.
Transferring the power to the state is simply a tactic to ban it, nothing more. Paul wouldn't be fighting to give the states power if abortions were illegal under federal law. He's a hypocrite.
evilsinzy 4 months ago
@evilsinzy ~ a fetus is part of her body, but it is somebody else. It just happens to need the sustenance provided by a mother like God's nature intended. To call the fetus just a part of her body, like an arm, mocks any intuitive common sense. Abortion is not the problem, it's a symptom of the problem of ill-conceived (no pun) recreational sex. But once you make it, you got it, both the father & mother. And the father should have say about any abortion. Miscarriage is natural abortion ☮ ♥
KristosSpark 3 months ago
@KristosSpark
I wouldn't call a 12 years old girl impregnated by her father "ill-conceived recreational sex". By your logic, it doesn't matter. Its still an individual and its irrelevant what the mothers situation is.
Or how about the women who was refused a late term abortion despite her body contracting and crushing the fetus in a slow painful death? That sadly happened not long ago.
"God's nature" intended animals to eat us for sustenance, does that mean we shouldn't stop them either?
evilsinzy 3 months ago
@evilsinzy ~ of course you are correct about situations where the mother's life is endangered, that could be considered "self-defense" by any rational person. The child concieved in rape or incest is another matter that could very well be resolved by allowing each state to vote and decide concerning an abortion. The States that would outlaw abortion would have to have a system of easy adoption or a well run orphanage paid for by the outlawing taxpayers. Choice prevails. Life is still dignified.
KristosSpark 3 months ago
@KristosSpark
So if a women is raped and pregnant, she can't decide on her own if she wants an abortion, yet the state can? What could possibly make you feel the state should have more control over a women than the women does of herself? Why should the states opinion matter, but not hers? Your collectivist and totalitarian position is disturbing. Are you fanatically religious or something? I know Ron Paul wants to allow states to decide, but thats only to avoid the supreme court ruling.
evilsinzy 3 months ago
@evilsinzy ~ no, the State Governments' opinion does not matter, it's the people's opinion that matters. The people decide. That way a "State" or Government cannot be allowed to do routine abortion either. That's exactly the point. Let the people decide what is proper & dignified for our human selves. NOT a STATE. But each State should have right to vote upon it. Thereby allowing it in some, not others, but it would NEVER be supreme law everywhere. Eugenics Sux, get it?? :)
KristosSpark 3 months ago
@KristosSpark
In your democratic style of personal freedom, a crackhead and a dropout working the drive-through window have twice the say as the pregnant women does. But we don't have a democracy! We have a Republic. You don't belong to the majority. America isn't a club, this is the land of the free, free from the majority of totalitarian moralists and religious authoritarians trying to control other peoples lives. Women will not be enslaved by your religious beliefs as long as freedom rings.
evilsinzy 2 months ago
@evilsinzy ~ dang brother....and I don't have a clue about your drive through comment, what's a crackhead & dropout have to do with it?? And women run EVERYTHING, so I don't know what your beef is my friend, ain't nobody gonna get enslaved, ha crazy....
KristosSpark 2 months ago
@evilsinzy
You are just repeating slanderous talking points. Go to Ron Paul's website and read his actual positions on these issues. Just a hint: He is personally against abortion but is for the right of states to allow abortion. He thinks (as I do) that evolution is not something you have to "believe in", but a theory, and that the government has no business declaring any theory as "The Truth". In science, theories continuously evolve and often are revised.
MrTotila 1 month ago
@MrTotila
"Slanderous talking points" my ass. Ron only wants to shift the power to the states because the supreme courts have already ruled for a women's choice.
He said he doesn't think there is proof for evolution. How can we trust the man's judgement when he accepts a fairytale of a woman made from the rib of a man made from dust over empirical evidence?
You don't have to believe the theory of gravity to know to not jump off a cliff. Evolution exists like gravity exists.
evilsinzy 1 month ago
@evilsinzy
Most scientist and Nobel price laureates are Christians and many of them believe the "fairytale" in the bible. Are they all idiots?
Gravity is something you can see and test in experiments. There is no way to see or test/replicate evolution, because this is a process which extends over millions of years. You can only study fossils and observe wildlife etc and then make educated guesses as to how this process might have led to the development of life.
MrTotila 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrTotila
« There is no way to see or test/replicate evolution »
There is, of course. Scientific hypotheses are formulated in such a way that they yield hypothetical logical consequences:
IF the hypothesis is true,
THEN we should be able to observe [X] *here* and *now*.
For common descent, [X] includes observations like nested hierarchies, morphological intermediates, diverging subpopulations, atavisms, and so on.
XGralgrathor 1 month ago
@evilsinzy
As to Ron Paul's intentions regarding the shift of power to the states: if you had followed my advice and read about him then you would know that this is not an evil ploy but a fundamental part of his philosophy: he wants to decentralize power away from the federal government as far down to the people as possible. The central government should only be responsible for the tasks that are given to it by the constitution: basically defense and upholding the law.
MrTotila 1 month ago
@MrTotila
The Supreme Court is not the central government. If he wants to give power to the people, how about the ones that are pregnant?
evilsinzy 1 month ago
One canard that is often stated by the creationist crowd is "If man descended from apes, then why are there still apes?" This statement demonstrates an appalling ignorance of the entire science of biology. NO ONE believes that humans descended from the apes that are alive today. Rather, they believe that both descended from a more generalized ancestor that lived millions of years ago.
trwent 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I noticed Ron Paul, who does not believe in evolution, did not raise his hand.
unactor 4 months ago
Is it just me that finds it disturbing that the most powerful country on earth is one of the least democratic 'democracies' in the world and is run by people who refuse to accept the masses of evidence presented before them (not all of them mind)?
startrekwarsmixguy 5 months ago
What he asked is, "Who does not believe in evolution?"
What they heard was, "Who's more patriotic?"
hugodominguez9 5 months ago
it doesnt really matter that they are creationists they are not less intelligent because of it since its all because of religious indoctrination and they can still be able to become good presidents.
even thought we all know evolution is true
unfad1ng 5 months ago
This is idiocracy at its best! Things like religion should have no place in the values of becoming president. Americas politics is turning into a religious feud. The presidency is beginning to be represented as a religious figure and statement. It sickens me...
coolsims94 6 months ago
I guess after all McCain isn't all backwards like so many Republicans out there.
Heegoop 6 months ago
Pokemon PROVES that evolution is real.
Lemileant 6 months ago
I like how "ape-man believers" that blindingly accept magical mutation theory as their RELIGION think anyone that doesnt "believe" in the pitiful pseudo-science of evolution is a "creationist" haha.
There are tons of atheists, agnostics, and gnostics that dont buy that evolution fairytale.
Its the most outdated, nonsensical fail of a theory to ever be mislabeled as "science"
Darwinian theory and Neo-Darwinism is a DISGRACE to real science in every way.
buffboynick 6 months ago
@buffboynick *sniff* *sniff* I smell a troll.
zzyzx0788 6 months ago
Yeah, not surprising. Huckabee even deletes contrarian comments on his "evolution" YT videos. (watch?v=n-BFEhkIujA) Way to stand up for free speech there, Mike.
twistedH3L1X 7 months ago
There are two kinds of primates: Those who believe in evolution and shitflingers.
Beatnikzombie 7 months ago
I'm sure some idiot right-wing politicians could shed a lot of light on quantum theory and the theory of relativity too . . .
sutircomed 7 months ago
@sutircomed Not to mention the theory of gravity.
roont 5 months ago
Glad those three aren't president.
June28July 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Belief in Evolution is a religious dogma, it is not based on science. Evolution is based on the ASSUMPTION that all living things have a common ancestor. Science is not based on assumptions.
Evolution is not science, it is religion.
abukamoon 7 months ago
Mike huckabee is not a creationist. This video is misleading.
gigaboy47 8 months ago
People who doesn't believe in science have no place in the white house.
Our society is based on science, and evolution is the best model thus far that explains the biological nature of every creature. Biology make no sense without evolution, and evolution have been proven and is able to be observed through rapid evolving micro-organisms.
Science is the future, and to deny science is to deny the US a future.
Neosaigo 8 months ago 2
@Neosaigo I'm an atheist and I totally believe in evolution but I wouldn't go so far as to say that biology makes no sense without the theory of evolution. It certainly helps a lot but there have been plenty of advancements made in all areas of science (including biology) unrelated to anything in terms of the theory of evolution. Let's not overstate our case, fellow atheist/evolutionists, it only helps the morons who want to discredit us!
danning1 7 months ago
@Neosaigo well if people like rick perry get into office we wont be making any scientific process. Im still mad that obama cut funding for NASA
midgetking101 3 months ago
@midgetking101 ~ NASA has be hijacked by some people who will not allow us the taxpayers who fund it to see all the information & data that is being collected in outer space. For some reason, deep space "secrets" are classified from us little people. It did not start out this way. The NASA agereement was got to see it all. Someone has changed the game. We should rethink the billions spent on NASA. They may be making antigravity TR-3B's UN police cars to come collect you, ey?? :) FEMA Camp.
KristosSpark 3 months ago
@KristosSpark Um... i dont know where you get your information form. NASA is a public agency, any one who is a scientists has access to anything NASA is working on, this ranges from using the hubble telescope, to using their vacuum chambers, or even using their wind tunnels. so what youre saying cant be true... its like saying that the "public" library is creating secret books and placing them on their shelves for all to see. it doesnt makes sence
midgetking101 3 months ago
I can test gravity every time I jump in the air. I, or anyone else, have never seen a species turn into another, MORE ADVANCED species through generations of breeding.
BibleIsland 9 months ago
@BibleIsland, your a dumbass. First off, there's no such thing as a more "advanced" species.
Second, we have observed many counts of speciation. Third, we have genetic evidence that show how closely related species are to eachother.
Fourth, does this mean that you don't believe in atomic theory? I mean no one has seen an atom.
Finally, educate yourself and learn what your saying. Your just embarrassing yourself.
spacewolf5462 9 months ago
@spacewolf5462 Get to know the theory. It states that through refinement the species change, adapt and become more advanced. Thats how 1 piece of matter turned into our whole bodies and all the cosmos according to those beliefs.
BibleIsland 9 months ago
@BibleIsland, "Get to know the theory. It states that through refinement the species change, adapt and become more advanced"
I'm sorry but your the one lacking in the understanding of the theory. Things don't become more "advanced", they become better acclimated to their environment. While this can lead them to become more complex, it doesn't necessitate it.
"Thats how 1 piece of matter turned into our whole bodies and all the cosmos "
again you demonstrate how little you actually know.
spacewolf5462 9 months ago
@BibleIsland Well, yes, speciation has been observed before whether you've seen it or not but on that note...
I'VE NEVER SEEN THE "GERMS" OF THESE DISEASES WITH MY OWN EYES! THE BIBLE IS RIGHT, DISEASES ARE CAUSED BY DEMONS! DOWN WITH GERM THEORY!!! GERMS CAN'T BE SEEN BY THE NAKED EYE? HOOOOOOOW CONVEINENT!
zzyzx0788 6 months ago
@zzyzx0788 They can be seen by simply looking through some glass though, it's not exactly magic.
brumfed10 5 months ago
@brumfed10 So you trust this magic "glass" to tell you if germs exist? Another bullshit "theory". Just like evolution.
zzyzx0788 5 months ago
@zzyzx0788
LOL! magic glass. Man I'm gunna have to steal that. Good troll
roont 5 months ago
@warterra I agree...
Although most Christians are fine with evolution, it's the crazy ones you gotta look out for.
photolads 9 months ago
@ucandrinkmytea gravity is actually the weakest of the foundational forces in the universe... So much for wisdom...
I too would really enjoy seeing your god save you from a swan dive off a tall cliff...
photolads 9 months ago
Diiiiiiiiiiiiisqualified!
hocobo 9 months ago
I look at the structure of the molecule, which is formed by at LEAST 2 atoms, which has it's OWN complex structure as well as DNA and the function of synapses and the ONLY reasonable conclusion I can come to is this;
These COMPLEX functions of these complex organisms could have NOT come about by mere chance!
It takes INCREDIBLE intelligence to understand their function, and I believe a PROFOUNDLY intelligent Person to have made these incredibly complex structures! His name IS Jehovah God!
ucandrinkmytea 9 months ago
of the 10 on the panel 7 are liars
MODDDZZZ 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dbzman1985 Thanks I've been looking for this video. watch?v=8FGYzZOZxMw
derman077 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dbzman1985 Thanks I've been looking for this video. watch?v=8FGYzZOZxMw
derman077 10 months ago
McCain is a fucking two faced shithead. At least Huckabee is honest about his stupid belief.
DrinkSkateSleep 10 months ago
@DrinkSkateSleep How UNWISE it is to believe the complexity of the synapses came from MERE CHANCE! I look at the branch chain of amino acids and how they work together for instance helping a body builder build muscle mass, and I MARVEL how well they work together along with hard work to make strong men stronger!
I look at the BEAUTIFUL complexity of differences between humans around the world and I see God's image in each of us!
I see the genius of creation, NOT the vagueness of evolution!
ucandrinkmytea 9 months ago
@ucandrinkmytea And you're wrong..
DrinkSkateSleep 9 months ago 2
@DrinkSkateSleep And yet many thousands of years later, mankind has only reached the level where he's just really beginning to simply UNDERSTAND how DNA and atoms fully function.
It just amazes me how some people THINK they know so much, they think somehow there is wisdom in the denial of God. The supernatural events I can attest to CANNOT be dispelled by psychiatric theories. My God is a force greater than gravity, a power I need NOT see to know how real He is!
ucandrinkmytea 9 months ago
@ucandrinkmytea If you honsetly believe that your god is stronger than gravity, then jump off a cliff,ask him to save you and see what happens. There is plenty of wisdom in the 'denial of god' as there is no objective, physical evidence to suggest that a god exists; mankind can only attain knowledge through evidence. Yes, there is a lot we still don't know, but that does not mean you can fill in the blanks with whatever bullshit seems plausible to you.
nailedurmum01 9 months ago
There are plenty of right wing atheists and right wing rational thinkers who accept evolution. This problem is a problem of certain pious religious people regardless of their politics.
warterra 10 months ago 2
Right wingers want to have it both ways. They want all the technological goodies that science can deliver but despise real science, especially when it challenges their knee jerk fairy tales and indoctrination
DawnOfTheDead991 10 months ago 2
My answer would have been, FIRE THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK
dillondailynews 10 months ago 2
@dillondailynews
i'll second that! get that whole green bank idea back or at least have the Fed not lead money to the gov with interest. if the Fed is truely a part of the government why the hell does it lend money to the government with interest attached?
DerekBCD 10 months ago
its like saying I dont believe in the laws of gravity ...
xn117 10 months ago 4
@xn117 Well some of them may believe in Intelligent falling t(x)/t(x): Cor 1:2 (some evangelical believe that falling is not the cause of gravity but the intelligence of god)
hinatah89 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Sorry to all those indoctrinated into religion. It's not your fault. Only be thankful we figured it out in our lifetime. Atleast you don't have to die ignorant, wether you accept it or not.
Just think of the neanderthals and what they went through every day, every year, for thousands of years. It's amazing.
northoforacle 10 months ago
Comment removed
northoforacle 10 months ago
McCain - one of the last remaining conservative moderates serving in the GOP.
SteelVelocity 11 months ago 2
john mccain donest believe in evolution bacause he stopped for a moment thought about it and then said yes
duelmaster742 11 months ago
@duelmaster742 Proof??? None? OK then.
hataketune 10 months ago
@hataketune you have the video
duelmaster742 10 months ago
@duelmaster742 Hesitation is NOT proof of anything. All it means is he thought about the question. Or perhaps hes getting old.
hataketune 10 months ago
@hataketune Would you need to think when asked "do you believe in gravity?" before you chuckle and answer with "duh, off course"?
ScientificBob 9 months ago
@duelmaster742 I think that actually shows some bravery... I think, during his hesitation, he was thinking, "I'm going to lose some evangelical and creationist votes but I can't say I don't accept evolution and retain my self respect!"
I thought McCain was a bit of a joke in the '08 election but fair play to him for not selling his soul (figuratively speaking, of course) to appeal to creationist morons.
rollingstoner100 10 months ago 2
how can the CONSERVATIVES not believe in evolution ... just look at GWBush and Barack Obama and you see that there was evolution. One is a dumb monkey who had to buy his way through Harvard MBA, thus running us into a great deficit and great depression...the other might be black but he got into harvard and graduated magna cum laude.
dalecampbl7 11 months ago
Good to see though, that McCain won the nomination, so the 2008 presidential race was between two politicans who respect science.
leizuoer 1 year ago 2
Fucking caveman. He believes in what is just a creation myth from ancient Jewish mythology over the collected knowledge of 200 years of painstaking research and knowledge from expert scientists. This man is DANGEROUS. All the world's experts are wrong and Huckabee's right??? Guess what ... the Celts had a creation story, as did the Romans, Greeks, Persians etc etc etc ... and they're all wrong. So is the one in the Old Testament. Fucking fairy tales. And he could be president of America. SAD.
leizuoer 1 year ago
the fallacy of thinking evolution is something to either believe or not believe in has never been more perfectly illustrated than in this clip.
scarygary5678 1 year ago
Is it any wonder we've become the laughing stock of the world?
davidls11 1 year ago
BWBWBHAHAHAHAHh not believing in evolution is the most retarded thing ever
sgtsnakeeyes11 1 year ago
Rephrase the question. "All dumb-f**** who don't believe in evolution, sit in a garbage can," and wheel out garbage cans.
menthol5 1 year ago
You don't have to be a scientist to run America, but when 97% of scientists believe in evolution...
I'm not all "left wing" but this religious bullshit makes me mad.
Upgrayedd08 1 year ago
Eeediots!
bluenoserr 1 year ago
with the economy, deficit, and two wars who gives a flying fuck about evolution? If anyone votes based on something like that theyre a fucking idiot.
chaset51 1 year ago
@chaset51 Believing in evolution demonstrates a belief in reason and science - a belief that is essential to progress in this country on all fronts.
squamish4244 1 year ago 48
@squamish4244 your wrong.
buuurke 9 months ago
Der did you just say that being some what smrt, awe hell I will go so farrr as to say dat reasonerable and/or rationeral and stuffs has nothing to do with run'n. Ok man talking like an idiot at your level is hard. Intelligence and rationality in regards to policy is mandatory for a candidate. If you do not believe in something as simple in concept (while complicated in process) which the majority of rational and intelligent humans do... you most likely are not qualified for office. YER!
CtheWolfe 1 year ago
Brownback and Tancredo are catholic
xaviqaz 1 year ago
i really doubt any of those 3 actually didnt believe in evolution. they were probably just saying they did to try to get the creationist vote (58% of the US population is creationist). if you watch the whole thing, when mike huckabee is asked to elaborate hes very careful as to what he says to make sure he isnt ignorant.
ihmen 1 year ago
@ihmen I think that at least Huckabee was being sincere.
hlyleh 1 year ago
*facepalm*
kevinjim33 1 year ago
I have to say, considering his constituents, it was surprisingly brave to answer yes to that. I don't agree with him at all politically, but it's good to know he's at least a little sane.
poetdesmond 1 year ago
@poetdesmond to bad his running mate didn't get that memo.
skydome29 1 year ago
McCain is actually a cool guy, turns out. I mean, I wouldn't vote for him by default because he's Republican, but he's stillcool
DanTheeMan 1 year ago
@DanTheeMan You honestly think any of these candidates follow agendas laid out to them by their "party". Do you honestly think "parties" even exist outside of voters' minds? The party system is a game and once you realize that, THEN you can play along and have some fun. Until then, you're just one of many cattle being told that Republicans are evil and Democrats are good. They're all PEOPLE trying to gain control over YOU. Wake up.
tpstrat14 1 year ago
@tpstrat14 I tend to avoid dipshit comments like yours. People are individuals. People trying to score political points are not individuals.
DanTheeMan 1 year ago
@drummer0529
Good news then, it's still a theory, still a fact, and you still don't know how we got here. But I do, and so does everyone else. So we can all be happy there.
rkyeun 1 year ago
The tards are the clowns that didn't raise their hands. How can anybody believe in that evolution crap? Oh wait .... there was an explosion at the chemical plant down the road ... let's go see what it created!!!
Bwahahahahahahahhaha
theaxarcist 1 year ago
@theaxarcist and you soooooooo have no idea what evolution is about =).
juuonse 1 year ago
@drummer0529 You misunderstand the word "theory". a scientific theory has nothing to do with an everyday "theory", which is merely equivalent to a hypothesis. A scientific theory is a vast body of knowledge, facts, and laws which have been observed and deduced, and widely accepted among the scientific community has being valid, in that they make good predictions (note here, science makes predictictions, it doesn't give you the truth). Evolution is a scientific theory, and one of our best.
goomba008 1 year ago 57
Dammit, Brownback. And to think you'll become the governor of my state soon.
mootothehood 1 year ago
there are three tards on stage
wrightman690 1 year ago
@wrightman690 Only 3? Granted, those 3 are the cream of the dumbfuck crop but still. And one of them (Brownback) is about to be my Governor! :'(
mootothehood 1 year ago
it's great how those three creationists make a wave raising their hands there. did a good job coordinating that.
strange they would go through all that trouble organising a wave for a question like that...
lygophile 1 year ago
idiots haha
jarroddudley 1 year ago
iddiots haha
jarroddudley 1 year ago
July 7, 09 the Piltdown Pope personally delivered an ecclesiastic letter to the G8 Conference directing them to gather the Nations of the earth & appoint a single Moral authority as Dictator (Anti-Christ). The press opted to cover M Jackson funeral. The Pope/Vatican affirmation of evolution heralded, as an outward invitation to heal the division, is a direct EVIL DENUNCIATION OF GOD & THE HOLY BIBLE. Evolutionists got an invitation to the Catholic Anti-Christian Church, they can't refuse.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
The real choice is Evolution by Intelligent Design or mud to man evolution.
kdc43 1 year ago
@kdc43 two thirds to a retard
UCMolosser 1 year ago
@UCMolosser No, the doc thinks I'm Autistic NOS, Hypo-ADD, OCD
kdc43 1 year ago
Torah Jews believe in One God the Father Almighty. Khaballa (Magik) Zionist Jews, practice expressly forbidden WitchCraft and Satanism.
Atheist = Satanist
Humanity's enemy is Gods enemy, Godforsaken Satanic Nazis
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
Fundamental Logic 101. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice), inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility, breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error, proving themself fundamentally a liar and a fraud. When Atheists dismiss the possibility of God, they breach their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity, to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
Atheist/Satanist = Evil Godforsaken Nazis
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious - As previously mentioned, there are many many transitional fossils, you just fail to acnowledge them, instead chosing to shift the goal posts so that they dont fit into your definition of transitional. The 2 most commony mentioned are of course Ida and Tiktaalik. We are lucky to have any at all considering the conditions needed to become a fossil. "Atheist/Satanist = Evil Godforsaken Nazis" = Fuck you and your death cult. Hitler/Nazi's were Roman Catholic you fucking douche.
Hardysamnin 1 year ago
Look, it is fundamental logic and simple. A commitment to the truth (the only sane choice) inherently expands to include all possibilities. Arbitrary dismissal of a possibility breaches that commitment as a fatal logic error proving the person fundamentally a liar and a fraud. When an Atheist dismisses the possibility of God, they breached their commitment to the truth, resulting in the mindfucked insanity to argue justifying a lie, is rational behavior.
Atheist = Satanist = Godforsaken
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious - Surely you must be aware, that their is more evidence to support the theory of evolution than there is say for instance, relativity, gravity and any other scientific theory.
And how the hell do you come to the conclusion that atheist = satanist. Dude how can you be a satanist if you don't believe in satan?
Hardysamnin 1 year ago
@Har
- A legitimate "Missing Link" is an Intergrading Animal Form, intermediate between the major groups of Phyla.
- Exactly what Piltdown Man was designed and planted to accomplish before finally revealed as a Hoax.
- Without a legitimate "missing link", Evolution has NEVER provided the "irrefutable evidence" to be taught as fact. An Evil Illusion, amounting to a Hoax sustained by a series of diabolical frauds, presented as the "missing link".
- Evolution is Satanic Fiction
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious - I believe today that I am acting in the sense of the Almighty Creator. By warding off the Jews I am fighting for the Lord's work.
- Adolf Hitler, Speech, Reichstag, 1936
We were convinced that the people need and require this faith. We have therefore undertaken the fight against the atheistic movement, and that not merely with a few theoretical declarations: we have stamped it out.
- Adolf Hitler, Speech in Berlin, October 24, 1933
Atheist = Nazi. Couldn't be more wrong.
Hardysamnin 1 year ago
@Hardysamnin <-----Satanic Nazi Genocidal Maniac. Hitler was Satanic. He met with Aleister Crowley who directed him to fulfill "Lams" demand for tribute. A Crowley channeled "Lam" and wrote the "Book of Law" in 3 while in a trance state. Crowley was in the same Satanic cult as Alan Parson (rocket science). Together they were highly publicized for Satanic Sex rituals. On the trip to Europe to meet with Hitler, Crowley fathered a daughter, Barbara Bush.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious - The Nazi belt buckle had the phrase "In God we trust" on it. All you have to do is read mein kampf to find out the true nature of his faith. Unless of course you are suggesting that's just a smoke screen to blame the Christian faith?
Either way you are delusional.
God is man made.
And if he is in fact real, he is a cunt, just like you. And speaking of genocidal, who is the most genocidal person in the bible. God = millions. Satan = less than 20.
Hardysamnin 1 year ago
@Hardysamnin
Master of Deception, didn't get the title for half-assed lies.
- What is the Jesuit 5th Oath and why were the Jesuits kicked out of every Country in Europe before finding refuge in America?
- How did they get back into the Vatican, after having been banned. Answer, they aren't Christian, they are Satanic. They further corrupted the Vatican. Piltdown Pope, walks around with a bent wooden Crucifix used in WitchCraft/Satanic Rituals, to publicly mock Jesus Christ.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@Hardysamnin <------- Satanic Nazi who resorts to schoolboy swearing, to match his childish ego.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious - Fuck off and die retard :) Fuck Jesus and Fuck Yahweh. All hail Satan.
Hardysamnin 1 year ago
@Hardysamnin Lord, God and Faith are not necessarily synonyms of Christianity.
xaviqaz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The social science of Economics, we find God. If Adam Smith had used the term God instead of "invisible hand", today we would be asking who was Adam Smith. The principle of self interest, helps determine the Laws of Supply & Demand. Natural Laws like gravity and can not be denied. Pitted against itself, in a free market self interest generates ABUNDANCE. Conversely, in controlled markets is guarantys SCARCITY & SHORTAGES. Born Capitalists, out of self interest we take our first breath.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
Comment removed
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
You proved your Satan's little helper. You claim to be a plumber's helper, yet apparently haven't figured out shit flows downhill?
The number of Satanic Nazi Shills camping these Atheist/Evolutionist videos is like a mother hen nurturing the oblivious, to adopt their Godforsaken lifestyle.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago
@waketheoblivious
"Honorable science has had a positive contribution to society"
honorable science is responsible for uncovering every single bit of understanding we have about reality..not just positivie contributions, but UNDERSTANDING of how nature works..the same goes for evolution, but because evolution in particular challenges your faith, u deny it..it's so very weak-minded of u..is tectonic plate theory from satanists?..is the theory of gravity from satanists?
itzahazylife 1 year ago
@itzahazylife <---- Pathetic blatantly obvious Satanic Nazi Shill who is clueless on Evolution. Doesn't know a transitional fossil from a missing link.
Then produce a legitimate "missing link" or STFU and quit making an ass our of yourself as a Satanic Nazi Shill who submits transitional fossils as the missing link. What a crock of shit.
waketheoblivious 1 year ago