@WombatGully3000 if you actually read the books that people VOTED to be in the so called "bible" and you don't realize that this CANNOT logically be the FUCKING PERFECT WORDS of a FUCKING PERFECT GOD and if you don't realize that it contains IMAGINARY NON-SENSIC ILLOGICAL BULLSHIT then I don't care what you fucking say because YOU DON'T FUCKING THINK LOGICALLY AND RATIONALLY!
@allaboutmath Q: "Where do you get your information from" A: "I watch two minute you tube clips, after this i am an expert on the topic" I bet you have never even read the bible. I suggest you get off you tube, stop watching two minute clips which are normally full of lies and speculation and get some real knowledge. Most people are blessed with sight and sound, yet most choose to be blind and deaf. Willingly ignorant if you ask me. Peace and god bless
Finkelstein is a flamer! A raving queer! He hates the very idea of God. There are dozens of people doing books, movies, and articles all aimed at tearing the Bible apart, ripping it up by the roots. The aim is to destroy as many people's faith in God as possible -- and the reason? So we'll all let homosexuals run rampant, raping our little kids, and aborting as many babies as they can because Satan (their unseen, unrealized master) hates babies and straights.
Finkelstein is just very selective. Many of his so called evidences are unsupported for his late dates and do not accord with other archaeological finds. The discovery of the code of Hamurrabi gives information about the culture in Ur of the Chaldees from which Abraham came and vastly pre-dates Finkelstein's dates. The Moses dynasty in Egyptian history is well known and supported by many artifacts. Many artifacts tell of the characters of whom he writes - they pre-date Finkelstein's dates.
First of all one's belief in this or that plays a part in how he or she goes about proving or disproving something. Finkelstein is a LIBERAL, HE'S HOMOSEXUAL, and he is not observant of any of the Jewish customs AT ALL. So why would you think he would be interested in proving the bible and proving the existence of Hebrews in Egypt and Judah? Finally if one wants to find evidence he must look in the right places and rarley does Finkelstein or any of his people do that!!!!
@tarasskeptic No I don't perceive anything I know Finkelstein's arguments are baseless because he views the world in a completly different way. HE IS LIBERAL, A JEW BUT NOT A TRUE JEW, Homosexual and those viewpoint and his personal lifestyle go against CVhristianity and Judaism. Knowing this its very easy for him to lie about evidence of the Jews history in the land. The evidence is everywhere if you look in the right places as I said before. Those are the facts!!!
@tarasskeptic I'm sorry but I have to agree with Preacheray. On another note, why listen to Israel Finkelstein? He's the most 'unJewish' Jew (if he ever is one) as he repudiates the existence of David and his kingdom, along with Solomon's. Only a few years ago, all of Finkelstein's contentions were proven wrong by the found made on a tablet reference to King David's name "the House of David". Finkelstein is typically skeptic, atheistic and anti-theist and anti-Israel.
@tuberobotto I.Finkelstein do not deny existence such figures as David and Solomon. He denies existence of a United Monarchy of David and Solomon.
To date, there is no evidence showing the existence of David&Solomon's empire. For ten years from writing Finkelstein's book his point of view supported by many other Israeli archaeologists.
@crucisnh You have to be catholic. Yes Mary was special she concieved God seed. But so do all born impregnated by the Holy Spirit, we are all brides of Christ. Matthew Mark Luke John the entire bible points to Jesus. As much as you catholics want this to be a Mary story it will never be so. Its a story about the conception of Jesus. However I have read in recent times. Old scrollls have been found in caves that say Jesus had a twin sister Tammy.
Abram story is a parallel story with the conception of Jesus story. Three angels,three wise men.Abram is old, Sara is old and barren. The angels say she will become with child,she laughs,why? Somehow she conceives,is it by the holy spirit as was Jesus. Or did Angels recharge Abram? Maybe herbs that made him lets say a younger more potant man. Looking at the two stories together we can see in a better light. Gods holy spirit is able to regenerate things long dorment even dead.
@liellibg Actually, it might be more of a parallel to the conception of the Virgin Mary, whose parents were supposedly old and childless. I don't remember, but I think that they were also supposedly visited by an angel or angels and she conceived a child when she was thought to be barren.
There is no hard evidence to support a war against the Canaanites. It was probably made up. Symbolic of the Israelites forsaking Canaanite gods for the worship of one favored God.
they are the synagogue of satan. they do every thing they could to hidde black ppls history. now the so called jews and thier european brethren call them nigga-nigger or neggro. THANKS TO GOD FOR THE TRUTH:
those ppl in israel today are not the original ppl of the bible, they are the hyksos who enslave the egyptians. the original ppl from that area are the black people, today they still have tradition of the ancient hebrews and egyptians. the hyksos call them self today jews, they knew where the akan = hebrews ppl to be found. they back again and enslave them to the trans atlantic slave trade. just because they steal black ppl history in the bible. and call them self the chosen ppl of god,
@ashan379 Ashan, I don't want to get into this "Egyptians were black" stuff, but you DO being up a very interesting historical point about the Hyksos people. I don't know whether they "enslaved" the egyptians or not. However, they certainly were foreigners who ruled the northern portion of ancient Egypt in the mid 2nd millennium BC. Could the Hyksos be the ancient Hebrews? It seems entirely possible. Even the famous ancient historian Josephus thought it to be the case.
There weren't any camels used in Canaan prior to 700 B.C. And they weren't even domesticated until about 1,000 B.C. Assyrian tablets describe the Caravan routes coming from Arabia to the Levant Coast (Mediterranean Coast of Canaan) in the 7th Century B.C. The Bible story of the Patriarchs fits what we know of the 7th Century B.C. It does not fit an earlier time period (& Abraham would have had to be much, much earlier because the 7th Century B.C. is after David).
@BMLafhameyer Oh come on. Of course the 7th Cent BC is after David. Was David already dead? Of course. The 7thC was about 3 centuries after David's life. You're confusing the usage of "before" and "after".
@drgnzadiel101 I never said she was the only woman. I said the text doesn't mention any children other than Cain, Abel, and Seth. Obviously, they weren't the only humans. After Cain kills Abel, he asks god to put a mark on him so anyone who found him wouldn't kill him. Of whom was he afraid? My point is this is a myth taken from the Sumerian creation myth. It's not historical.
@letloverule77 where does it say Eve bore anyone before Cain and Abel? That's a far-fetched theory and attempt to reconcile the fiction. Cain went to the land of Nod and found his wife.
@BMLafhameyer bibel deosnt mention. like how exodus was just a bunch of caanites who left caanan because of drought, famine, lack of food then head to egypt and work for them. not as slaves. then they wanted out when they were payed to do normal laboring jobs. so they left, pillaged a town for supplies and thats when the pharoah decided to turn back and get them. egyptians were tricked and the now "israelites" escaped. they continue to murder all men, women, children.
@drgnzadiel101 all the way to jericho. tell me now what did those canaanites that stayed behind do to these israelites? what kind of a god would let men kill all men, women, children, and elderly? every gospel or book in the bible was written centuries after. you should read a history book
@Myaucat The Bible has writtings influenced by God. Not written by God himself. Some things, like what you are trying to interpret were excepted by how they understood their environment and world around them. The Bible is a guide and gives us an account of the people of God. Read it sometime.
@BMLafhameyer uh huh.. all the cultures have their own book that say it was influenced by their god. some even much older than the bible. so which god are you referring to and what makes you so sure that your god is THE god?
@KEVINDWILLIS : Show us your evidence that two humped camels were domesticated in the Levant and Egypt in the 3rd millennium B. C. for pulling wagons, etc.
The more you look, the less you see. Genesis 4 Verses 15:16. And the Lord set a Mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him. 16 Then Cain went out from the Lord's presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden, Nod meaning Wondering. My question is if Adam and Eve were the only people on earth, given birth to Cane and Abel, Abel is killed by Cain and Cain is banished. Where did he get the wife who bore Enoch and who are the people to kill him if he was ever found due to the mark
@dicksnko Your answer, Before Eve had Cain and Abel she bore nothing but Girls and more Girls. And then Adam called her Eve because she was the mother of all living. He named her this before she ever had any boy babies. Chapter one near the end he names her Eve and in Chapter 2 she bore a man Cain and Abel. Peace!
@vivalaleta Am i, look for yourself. There was no sin until the Torah came. I was alive and then came the Torah (instructions in righteous). then i died So until Moshe, brought the Torah from Yahuwah there was not sin. Cain took his older sister for a wife in the land of nod. There were no other women having children, save Eve. So Adam called her Eve because she was the mother of all living.
@letloverule77 You say yourself how incest was not "sin" until something occurred that made it so. Sin is just a word. There IS no sin. There is right and wrong, moral and immoral.
@vivalaleta There was no Law (Torah) at the time of Adam and Eve Except Do not eat of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.. The Law came much later when Mose received it from Yahweh on top Mount Sinai. There he was given the 10 commandments and 613 Ordinances. After this if you broke any of these you sined
@vivalaleta Read the Bible and find out what the definition of sin is... Interpreting the meaning on ignorance makes you look strange. A sin is against God... an action against what is a KNOWN moral, and what is defined by God! There is also a difference in whom is held accountable for the commited sins. You compare the word sin to right and wrong... that all depends on the word of God, which is then a "Sin" ... My definition of "Sin" not only comes from the Bible, but from philosophy.
@BMLafhameyer Have you "read the bible"? Really? So then are you fluent in Aramaic, Greek and Hebrew and have you had access to what's left of the original manuscripts? Have you also studied the history and culture of the span of time the books were written in, to better understand their true meaning? If you haven't done any or all of those things then you are a hypocrite and it is utterly irresponsible for you to be speaking authoritatively about a subject you are woefully unqualified in.
@BMLafhameyer Don't tell me to read the Bible when I had studied it for decades.
Oh, what high and mighty bullshit, BM.
So, you never wear two different kinds of fabric together at the same time?
You never eat shrimp? You'd send a kid to hell for stealing a pack of gum? Leave that immoral and ridiculous religion in the distant past it came from.
Dude, not to get into a religious debate, but if you've "studied the Bible for decades" how the heck do you not know a thing about Covenant theology?
I'm so sick of all these lying little internet atheists claiming "I read the Bible cover to cover a dozen times, blah blah blah," and then making elementary mistakes in your theology.
So there isn't different covenants in the Bible within the covenant of Grace? Did you not read Exodus 20 or the institution of the Eucharist in the Gospels in all those decades? Give me a break.
@AgApE010 I'm not saying what you think I am. God has only different covenants. Covenant theology teaches that people used to be justified outside of the grace of God. NO FLESH is justified by the works of the law.
Gen_6:8 But Noah found GRACE in the eyes of the LORD
Exo_33:13 Now therefore, I pray, if I have found GRACE in thy sight, shew me now thy way, that I may know thee, that I may find GRACE in thy sight: and consider that this nation is thy people.
@AgApE010 Don't think that I'm come to destroy the law or prophets: I'm not come to destroy but complete (see greek)
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from the law, till all passes (see greek)
So whoever shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
@AgApE010 My comments were somewhat ignorant, I have done more reading now and see I didn't really know what covenant theology was, I was thinking of dispensationalism. Sorry about that. Still, good scriptures to ponder. God bless
@vivalaleta the bible doesn't say a kid goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum. A man goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum when he was a child when he didn't repent. Children do not yet fully know good and evil. If you have read the bible from cover to cover so many times how many prophecies of Christ did you read
@vivalaleta the bible doesn't say a kid goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum. A man goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum when he was a child when he didn't repent. Children do not yet fully know good and evil. If you have read the bible from cover to cover so many times how many prophecies of Christ did you read?
@Serapherus #1 Richard Bulliet is a history professor at Columbia who specializes in "the history of Islamic society and institutions, the history of technology, and the history of the role of animals in human society." His comments carry the weight of scholarship, NOT assumptions.
#2 Finklestein's video provides not one "visual proof to sustain" his assumption in the video.
@Serapherus #1 Richard Bulliet is a history professor at Columbia who specializes in "the history of Islamic society and institutions, the history of technology, and the history of the role of animals in human society." His comments carry the weight of scholarship, NOT assumptions.
#2 Finklestein's video provides not one "visual proof to sustain" his assumption in the video.
So they took 51 min only to tell us that abraham, isaac and jacob were not related?. I understand they must be sensible with fundamentalists, but they need to face it, at the end of the day only secular people take this sort of documentary seriously.
Interesting that they say "the camel could not have been domesticated before 1,000 BC". Bulliet, Richard [1975]. The Camel and the Wheel "As has already been mentioned, this type of utilization [camels pulling wagons] goes back to the earliest known period of two-humped camel domestication in the third millennium B.C."
Missed it by over 1,000 years! Don't worry, that's still close by black hole measurements.
@kevindwillis That is a quote identifiable as an assumption. Where are the man's sources and visual proof to sustain the supposition? Many people can imagine that they had camels back then in ancient desert lands simply because art and the human mind makes a connection between the desert animal and its environment when thinking of it. But this is the civilized scientific world that makes educated guesses based on factual proof, not on assumptions, loosely founded statements, nor on cartoons. :/
Does anyone else think it odd that the Sennacherib Prism with it's proven dates negates this estimate that Abraham lived in about 700 BC? Did these guys not consider the work of other archaeologists at all?
So after telling us that archeaologians digging in the Middle East with the Bible in hand, had great success, you then try to tell us that archealogians digging in Meggido (not a scene of any Bible story) who deny the Bible, can be trusted to know better than the patriarchs themselves, where and when and how they lived. By looking at Meggido, where none of them ever went.
@SaltNPepperish What's lacking in the video is that people back then painstakingly made copies of the Bible. It takes a long time to copy just one and then pass it on. So what they've discovered here is nothing new.
@WombatGully3000 if you actually read the books that people VOTED to be in the so called "bible" and you don't realize that this CANNOT logically be the FUCKING PERFECT WORDS of a FUCKING PERFECT GOD and if you don't realize that it contains IMAGINARY NON-SENSIC ILLOGICAL BULLSHIT then I don't care what you fucking say because YOU DON'T FUCKING THINK LOGICALLY AND RATIONALLY!
REALITY EXISTS! GODS DON'T EXIST!
allaboutmath 1 hour ago
Clyde, thanks for the laugh tonight. Keep 'em coming.
icarusdescending881 1 week ago
12:25 says the bible is the worlds most widely read book, they forgot to mention until Harry Potter came out.
MrCaptainMetal 1 week ago
Q: "What exactly is contained in this book?"
A: Imaginary non-sensic illogical bullshit.
allaboutmath 2 weeks ago
@allaboutmath Q: "Where do you get your information from" A: "I watch two minute you tube clips, after this i am an expert on the topic" I bet you have never even read the bible. I suggest you get off you tube, stop watching two minute clips which are normally full of lies and speculation and get some real knowledge. Most people are blessed with sight and sound, yet most choose to be blind and deaf. Willingly ignorant if you ask me. Peace and god bless
WombatGully3000 14 hours ago
He is a scientist, not a theologian. Theologians have no place in science.
tarasskeptic 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos 4
Finkelstein is a flamer! A raving queer! He hates the very idea of God. There are dozens of people doing books, movies, and articles all aimed at tearing the Bible apart, ripping it up by the roots. The aim is to destroy as many people's faith in God as possible -- and the reason? So we'll all let homosexuals run rampant, raping our little kids, and aborting as many babies as they can because Satan (their unseen, unrealized master) hates babies and straights.
icarusdescending881 2 weeks ago
@icarusdescending881 I can't believe your kind of Middle Ages speech still exist. Please be a troll...
ClydePaquinYT 1 week ago
It's wishful thinking.
tarasskeptic 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
Finkelstein is just very selective. Many of his so called evidences are unsupported for his late dates and do not accord with other archaeological finds. The discovery of the code of Hamurrabi gives information about the culture in Ur of the Chaldees from which Abraham came and vastly pre-dates Finkelstein's dates. The Moses dynasty in Egyptian history is well known and supported by many artifacts. Many artifacts tell of the characters of whom he writes - they pre-date Finkelstein's dates.
preacheray 2 weeks ago
First of all one's belief in this or that plays a part in how he or she goes about proving or disproving something. Finkelstein is a LIBERAL, HE'S HOMOSEXUAL, and he is not observant of any of the Jewish customs AT ALL. So why would you think he would be interested in proving the bible and proving the existence of Hebrews in Egypt and Judah? Finally if one wants to find evidence he must look in the right places and rarley does Finkelstein or any of his people do that!!!!
4lifeReagan 2 weeks ago
@4lifeReagan The main reason you don't perceive Finkelstein's arguments is that they touch your religious and national feelings.
But the truth is one. And it can't depend on your feelings.
tarasskeptic 2 weeks ago 5
@tarasskeptic No I don't perceive anything I know Finkelstein's arguments are baseless because he views the world in a completly different way. HE IS LIBERAL, A JEW BUT NOT A TRUE JEW, Homosexual and those viewpoint and his personal lifestyle go against CVhristianity and Judaism. Knowing this its very easy for him to lie about evidence of the Jews history in the land. The evidence is everywhere if you look in the right places as I said before. Those are the facts!!!
4lifeReagan 2 weeks ago
@4lifeReagan Well, I just hope that The "TRUE JEWS" are not intolerant and disrespectful as you are.
ClydePaquinYT 1 week ago
This video is intellectually and evidentially bankrupt.
preacheray 2 weeks ago
@preacheray I don't think so.
tarasskeptic 2 weeks ago in playlist Uploaded videos
@tarasskeptic I'm sorry but I have to agree with Preacheray. On another note, why listen to Israel Finkelstein? He's the most 'unJewish' Jew (if he ever is one) as he repudiates the existence of David and his kingdom, along with Solomon's. Only a few years ago, all of Finkelstein's contentions were proven wrong by the found made on a tablet reference to King David's name "the House of David". Finkelstein is typically skeptic, atheistic and anti-theist and anti-Israel.
tuberobotto 2 weeks ago
@tarasskeptic 2) And I reiterate Preacheray's statement: This video is (dangerously) intellectually and evidentially bankrupt.
tuberobotto 2 weeks ago
@tuberobotto I don't think so.
tarasskeptic 2 weeks ago
@tuberobotto I.Finkelstein do not deny existence such figures as David and Solomon. He denies existence of a United Monarchy of David and Solomon.
To date, there is no evidence showing the existence of David&Solomon's empire. For ten years from writing Finkelstein's book his point of view supported by many other Israeli archaeologists.
tarasskeptic 2 weeks ago
@crucisnh You have to be catholic. Yes Mary was special she concieved God seed. But so do all born impregnated by the Holy Spirit, we are all brides of Christ. Matthew Mark Luke John the entire bible points to Jesus. As much as you catholics want this to be a Mary story it will never be so. Its a story about the conception of Jesus. However I have read in recent times. Old scrollls have been found in caves that say Jesus had a twin sister Tammy.
liellibg 3 weeks ago
Abram story is a parallel story with the conception of Jesus story. Three angels,three wise men.Abram is old, Sara is old and barren. The angels say she will become with child,she laughs,why? Somehow she conceives,is it by the holy spirit as was Jesus. Or did Angels recharge Abram? Maybe herbs that made him lets say a younger more potant man. Looking at the two stories together we can see in a better light. Gods holy spirit is able to regenerate things long dorment even dead.
liellibg 1 month ago
@liellibg Actually, it might be more of a parallel to the conception of the Virgin Mary, whose parents were supposedly old and childless. I don't remember, but I think that they were also supposedly visited by an angel or angels and she conceived a child when she was thought to be barren.
crucisnh 3 weeks ago
Great episode, I like studying ancient people from all over the world for their beliefs differ. Taking one as true is as foolish as the next though.
gregesparza00 1 month ago
There is no hard evidence to support a war against the Canaanites. It was probably made up. Symbolic of the Israelites forsaking Canaanite gods for the worship of one favored God.
4squaredby4times4 1 month ago
they are the synagogue of satan. they do every thing they could to hidde black ppls history. now the so called jews and thier european brethren call them nigga-nigger or neggro. THANKS TO GOD FOR THE TRUTH:
ashan379 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
those ppl in israel today are not the original ppl of the bible, they are the hyksos who enslave the egyptians. the original ppl from that area are the black people, today they still have tradition of the ancient hebrews and egyptians. the hyksos call them self today jews, they knew where the akan = hebrews ppl to be found. they back again and enslave them to the trans atlantic slave trade. just because they steal black ppl history in the bible. and call them self the chosen ppl of god,
ashan379 1 month ago
@ashan379 Ashan, I don't want to get into this "Egyptians were black" stuff, but you DO being up a very interesting historical point about the Hyksos people. I don't know whether they "enslaved" the egyptians or not. However, they certainly were foreigners who ruled the northern portion of ancient Egypt in the mid 2nd millennium BC. Could the Hyksos be the ancient Hebrews? It seems entirely possible. Even the famous ancient historian Josephus thought it to be the case.
crucisnh 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
ashan379 1 month ago
jacob = israel, the name israel related to the akan tribe in africa ghana. the akan ppl call israel = asrae .
ashan379 1 month ago
There weren't any camels used in Canaan prior to 700 B.C. And they weren't even domesticated until about 1,000 B.C. Assyrian tablets describe the Caravan routes coming from Arabia to the Levant Coast (Mediterranean Coast of Canaan) in the 7th Century B.C. The Bible story of the Patriarchs fits what we know of the 7th Century B.C. It does not fit an earlier time period (& Abraham would have had to be much, much earlier because the 7th Century B.C. is after David).
KidsandKarma 2 months ago
@KidsandKarma The 7th Century BC is not after david... lol David was in the 10th Century.
BMLafhameyer 1 month ago
@BMLafhameyer Oh come on. Of course the 7th Cent BC is after David. Was David already dead? Of course. The 7thC was about 3 centuries after David's life. You're confusing the usage of "before" and "after".
crucisnh 3 weeks ago
@drgnzadiel101 I never said she was the only woman. I said the text doesn't mention any children other than Cain, Abel, and Seth. Obviously, they weren't the only humans. After Cain kills Abel, he asks god to put a mark on him so anyone who found him wouldn't kill him. Of whom was he afraid? My point is this is a myth taken from the Sumerian creation myth. It's not historical.
tonetone153 2 months ago
@letloverule77 where does it say Eve bore anyone before Cain and Abel? That's a far-fetched theory and attempt to reconcile the fiction. Cain went to the land of Nod and found his wife.
tonetone153 2 months ago 2
@tonetone153 But if Eve was the only woman alive, how did he find a wife?
drgnzadiel101 2 months ago in playlist bible unearthed
@drgnzadiel101 Read ther Bible and find out.
BMLafhameyer 1 month ago
@BMLafhameyer bibel deosnt mention. like how exodus was just a bunch of caanites who left caanan because of drought, famine, lack of food then head to egypt and work for them. not as slaves. then they wanted out when they were payed to do normal laboring jobs. so they left, pillaged a town for supplies and thats when the pharoah decided to turn back and get them. egyptians were tricked and the now "israelites" escaped. they continue to murder all men, women, children.
drgnzadiel101 1 month ago
@drgnzadiel101 all the way to jericho. tell me now what did those canaanites that stayed behind do to these israelites? what kind of a god would let men kill all men, women, children, and elderly? every gospel or book in the bible was written centuries after. you should read a history book
drgnzadiel101 1 month ago
first of all, the world is not 4000 years old, so you have to address that problem first.
Myaucat 2 months ago 2
@Myaucat The Bible has writtings influenced by God. Not written by God himself. Some things, like what you are trying to interpret were excepted by how they understood their environment and world around them. The Bible is a guide and gives us an account of the people of God. Read it sometime.
BMLafhameyer 1 month ago
@BMLafhameyer uh huh.. all the cultures have their own book that say it was influenced by their god. some even much older than the bible. so which god are you referring to and what makes you so sure that your god is THE god?
Myaucat 1 month ago
Correction: The video states that "MEGIDDO" has been occupied since 5,000BC not 7,000BC.
Therefore, 4,000 years of HISTORY occured in that area BEFORE so-called JEWS even arrived.
wwrecords1 3 months ago
This video states that "MEGIDDO" has been occupied since circa 7,000BC.
Yet, ARCHAEOLOGY PROVES that so-called JEWS did NOT arrive there until circa 1,100BC.
So, 4,000 years of NON-JEWISH HISTORY have been left out.
In other words, JEWS can NOT take credit for anything BEFORE 1,100BC in CANAAN.
Also, the BIBLE, which JEWS THEMSELVES WROTE, states that the 1st KING on EARTH was a CUSHITE , named NIMROD... NOT A SEMITE named ABRAHAM.
This VIDEO does NOT even mention NIMROD'S name.
wwrecords1 3 months ago
@wwrecords1 The correct date is 1200 BCE not 1100 BCE.
bluejayscottable 3 months ago
educated idiots
mkpete777 4 months ago
THIS DOCUMENTARY IS A MASTERPIECE !
@KEVINDWILLIS : Show us your evidence that two humped camels were domesticated in the Levant and Egypt in the 3rd millennium B. C. for pulling wagons, etc.
NECHOII 4 months ago
The more you look, the less you see. Genesis 4 Verses 15:16. And the Lord set a Mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him. 16 Then Cain went out from the Lord's presence and lived in the land of Nod, east of Eden, Nod meaning Wondering. My question is if Adam and Eve were the only people on earth, given birth to Cane and Abel, Abel is killed by Cain and Cain is banished. Where did he get the wife who bore Enoch and who are the people to kill him if he was ever found due to the mark
dicksnko 4 months ago
@dicksnko Your answer, Before Eve had Cain and Abel she bore nothing but Girls and more Girls. And then Adam called her Eve because she was the mother of all living. He named her this before she ever had any boy babies. Chapter one near the end he names her Eve and in Chapter 2 she bore a man Cain and Abel. Peace!
letloverule77 3 months ago
@letloverule77 (shhhhh...you are insane)
vivalaleta 2 months ago
@vivalaleta Am i, look for yourself. There was no sin until the Torah came. I was alive and then came the Torah (instructions in righteous). then i died So until Moshe, brought the Torah from Yahuwah there was not sin. Cain took his older sister for a wife in the land of nod. There were no other women having children, save Eve. So Adam called her Eve because she was the mother of all living.
letloverule77 2 months ago
@letloverule77 You know your fantasy book very well. Come on another page and challenge me about Middle Earth. That is MY expertise.
vivalaleta 2 months ago
@vivalaleta I am not the one living in a Fantasy, Miss Lord of the Rings.
letloverule77 2 months ago
@letloverule77 Oh, but you are.
vivalaleta 2 months ago
@letloverule77 You say yourself how incest was not "sin" until something occurred that made it so. Sin is just a word. There IS no sin. There is right and wrong, moral and immoral.
vivalaleta 2 months ago
Comment removed
letloverule77 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vivalaleta There was no Law (Torah) at the time of Adam and Eve Except Do not eat of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.. The Law came much later when Mose received it from Yahweh on top Mount Sinai. There he was given the 10 commandments and 613 Ordinances. After this if you broke any of these you sined
letloverule77 2 months ago
@vivalaleta Read the Bible and find out what the definition of sin is... Interpreting the meaning on ignorance makes you look strange. A sin is against God... an action against what is a KNOWN moral, and what is defined by God! There is also a difference in whom is held accountable for the commited sins. You compare the word sin to right and wrong... that all depends on the word of God, which is then a "Sin" ... My definition of "Sin" not only comes from the Bible, but from philosophy.
BMLafhameyer 1 month ago
@BMLafhameyer Have you "read the bible"? Really? So then are you fluent in Aramaic, Greek and Hebrew and have you had access to what's left of the original manuscripts? Have you also studied the history and culture of the span of time the books were written in, to better understand their true meaning? If you haven't done any or all of those things then you are a hypocrite and it is utterly irresponsible for you to be speaking authoritatively about a subject you are woefully unqualified in.
8triagrammer 1 month ago
@BMLafhameyer Don't tell me to read the Bible when I had studied it for decades.
Oh, what high and mighty bullshit, BM.
So, you never wear two different kinds of fabric together at the same time?
You never eat shrimp? You'd send a kid to hell for stealing a pack of gum? Leave that immoral and ridiculous religion in the distant past it came from.
vivalaleta 1 month ago
@vivalaleta
Dude, not to get into a religious debate, but if you've "studied the Bible for decades" how the heck do you not know a thing about Covenant theology?
I'm so sick of all these lying little internet atheists claiming "I read the Bible cover to cover a dozen times, blah blah blah," and then making elementary mistakes in your theology.
AgApE010 1 month ago
@AgApE010 maybe because covenant theology isn't biblical.
thelordssoldier83 1 month ago
@thelordssoldier83
So there isn't different covenants in the Bible within the covenant of Grace? Did you not read Exodus 20 or the institution of the Eucharist in the Gospels in all those decades? Give me a break.
AgApE010 1 month ago
@AgApE010 I'm not saying what you think I am. God has only different covenants. Covenant theology teaches that people used to be justified outside of the grace of God. NO FLESH is justified by the works of the law.
Gen_6:8 But Noah found GRACE in the eyes of the LORD
Exo_33:13 Now therefore, I pray, if I have found GRACE in thy sight, shew me now thy way, that I may know thee, that I may find GRACE in thy sight: and consider that this nation is thy people.
Moses was under grace
thelordssoldier83 1 month ago
Comment removed
thelordssoldier83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AgApE010 Don't think that I'm come to destroy the law or prophets: I'm not come to destroy but complete (see greek)
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from the law, till all passes (see greek)
So whoever shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
thelordssoldier83 1 month ago
@AgApE010 My comments were somewhat ignorant, I have done more reading now and see I didn't really know what covenant theology was, I was thinking of dispensationalism. Sorry about that. Still, good scriptures to ponder. God bless
thelordssoldier83 1 month ago
@vivalaleta the bible doesn't say a kid goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum. A man goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum when he was a child when he didn't repent. Children do not yet fully know good and evil. If you have read the bible from cover to cover so many times how many prophecies of Christ did you read
?
thelordssoldier83 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vivalaleta the bible doesn't say a kid goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum. A man goes to hell for stealing a pack of gum when he was a child when he didn't repent. Children do not yet fully know good and evil. If you have read the bible from cover to cover so many times how many prophecies of Christ did you read?
thelordssoldier83 1 month ago
The more you look, the less you see.
dicksnko 4 months ago
@Serapherus #1 Richard Bulliet is a history professor at Columbia who specializes in "the history of Islamic society and institutions, the history of technology, and the history of the role of animals in human society." His comments carry the weight of scholarship, NOT assumptions.
#2 Finklestein's video provides not one "visual proof to sustain" his assumption in the video.
kevindwillis 5 months ago
@Serapherus #1 Richard Bulliet is a history professor at Columbia who specializes in "the history of Islamic society and institutions, the history of technology, and the history of the role of animals in human society." His comments carry the weight of scholarship, NOT assumptions.
#2 Finklestein's video provides not one "visual proof to sustain" his assumption in the video.
kevindwillis 5 months ago
So they took 51 min only to tell us that abraham, isaac and jacob were not related?. I understand they must be sensible with fundamentalists, but they need to face it, at the end of the day only secular people take this sort of documentary seriously.
misscuccicucci 5 months ago
Interesting that they say "the camel could not have been domesticated before 1,000 BC". Bulliet, Richard [1975]. The Camel and the Wheel "As has already been mentioned, this type of utilization [camels pulling wagons] goes back to the earliest known period of two-humped camel domestication in the third millennium B.C."
Missed it by over 1,000 years! Don't worry, that's still close by black hole measurements.
kevindwillis 6 months ago
@kevindwillis That is a quote identifiable as an assumption. Where are the man's sources and visual proof to sustain the supposition? Many people can imagine that they had camels back then in ancient desert lands simply because art and the human mind makes a connection between the desert animal and its environment when thinking of it. But this is the civilized scientific world that makes educated guesses based on factual proof, not on assumptions, loosely founded statements, nor on cartoons. :/
Serapherus 5 months ago
Does anyone else think it odd that the Sennacherib Prism with it's proven dates negates this estimate that Abraham lived in about 700 BC? Did these guys not consider the work of other archaeologists at all?
kevindwillis 6 months ago
So after telling us that archeaologians digging in the Middle East with the Bible in hand, had great success, you then try to tell us that archealogians digging in Meggido (not a scene of any Bible story) who deny the Bible, can be trusted to know better than the patriarchs themselves, where and when and how they lived. By looking at Meggido, where none of them ever went.
SaltNPepperish 7 months ago
@SaltNPepperish You either didn't watch the video or you are a bit dense.
nickpification 7 months ago
@nickpification Go with dense. Thick, dull, retarded, ignorant, blind faith etc.
Serapherus 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@nickpification Go with dense. Thick, dull, retarded, ignorant, blind faith etc.
Serapherus 5 months ago
@SaltNPepperish What's lacking in the video is that people back then painstakingly made copies of the Bible. It takes a long time to copy just one and then pass it on. So what they've discovered here is nothing new.
Naturalhit 7 months ago