My favorite bit "I actually feel sorry for the poor bastards we're going up against. We're not just going to shoot the bastard, we're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy hun bastards by the bushel!" We should have that attitude towards the terrorists.
I don't know if anyone who's watched the Patton movie and this clip realizes that the words spoken were from a real speech given by the real Gen. Patton. Maybe not 100% word for word, but amazingly close. There's a Patton website on the internet with the actual words of the speech and you'd be impressed by how close the movie was to the real thing.
How he opens it is the best!! "I want you to remember....that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country....he won it...by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." IT IS A TOP MOVIE QUOTE!!! But won't be viewed as that w/ our "liberal society" WAKE UP AMERICA!!! We have enemies and have to go to war...I piss on these peace activists and I'm still in my 20's...I PISS ON MY GENERATION!!!!
As a big liberal I despise war. BUT, if there must be war let the full power of democracy be unholstered and turn on it's enemy. If I were a president I would want the meanest, toughtest, most aggressive SOB to head my army IN THE FIELD, like Patton. Make him answer to an administrator with a cool head, otherwise leave him alone. I'll bet FDR, another big liberal felt the same way.
Lol all I see are a bunch of Europeans downplaying Americas troops. WW1, WW2, Cold War all achieved victory through America. In 30 years when you guys have another civil war, your pussy asses will call for America again.
1:42 to 2:36 is the perfect refutation to Ron Paul!
General David Petraeus is an awesome general--but he's kind of on the "soft-spoken" side. Chances are, we'd never hear from him an in-your-FACE speech like this. Shame, that.
@Willis2992 That would be awesome, I'd say! I suspect the reason Obama made him CIA chief was to keep a potential threat close...as there were some rumblings on the GOP side, on drafting the general to be the Republican candidate for president.
@RushLimborg Yeah definitely. Never believe someone when they say they have no political ambitions. If the Reps lose the coming election in November, they will do everything in their power to draft him in as the next candidate.
"We're not just gonna shoot the bastards....we're gonna cut out their living guts, and use them to grease the treads of our tanks! We're gonna murder those lousy Hun bastards, by the bushel!"
* a few seconds later..
" ....we're gonna hold onto him by the nose, and kick him in the ass, we're gonna kick the hell outta him all the time, and we're gonna go through him like crap through a goose!!"
@TheVoiceOfReason93 The US never "lost" the Vietnam War but simply left due to high political propagandas cuz of hippies and wimps wanted the war to stop. The US were winning that war but simply just left it thats all, but yeah I guess Patton's ghost would probably yell
@bda617 He'd be yelling more than that, committing to record more insults and cuss words than anyone would have heard in their lifetime. He'd have commited gross insubordination on such a grand scale that he'd go into the books of Guinness for all time.
No, George would not have tolerated the BS that surrounded 'Nam and the BS tactics they employed that killed solders. He would have pushed to invade, take Hanoi and fix the situation once and for all.
There were generals that advocated that. And they didn't because doing that would mean dealing with Russia and China, and even Patton wasn't that bloodthirsty.
2:27 that's what you think... uh cough cough cough,vietnam, cough cough cough, korea, cough cough cough. he was right about that fightig stuff and americans though.
@lolackay i know the order, and i'm pretty sure that there isn't a good chance that korea is going to attack amercia any time soon, and since we were the first to leave....
@15speeda If you actually read up on your history, you would find that we won both Vietnam and Korea. North Vietnam surrendered to America after the Christmas bombings. We then decided to pull out, and left S. Vietnam to defend itself, which quickly fell to the NVA onslaught.
General MacArthur pushed the N. Koreans back from S. Korea all the way up to the Chinese border during the Korean war. Then those politicians demanded he pull back to the 38th parallel. Learn your history!
All this talk of Patton being "fresh" and his enemies being "tired" is pretty hilarious considering that this is a large part (probably the most important part) of military strategy. Patton favored fast movement, scouting, and the use of solid supply lines. He insisted his men were hygenic and properly dressed against environmental hazards. I'm sorry if your video games tell you otherwise, but this is what winning a war is really about.
Patton used to go out to the front lines...from what I read it got him into trouble, the higher ups did not want to risk losing one of their generals and so didn't want them out on the front lines.
@whiskeyify Patton came under direct small arms fire during the Lorraine forest campaign /Battle of Metz.. Meeks, Pattons driver, took a wrong turn while out on inspection.
@13times I think I read somewhere that he helped another soldier set-up a Mortar to fire at enemy troops..that's how close he was to enemy lines that day.
Gen. George Patton, You Sir are still the very best example of what a REAL AMERICAN IS!!! That is, next to Gen. Chesty Puller and Gen. Smedley Butler. "WE WILL ALL DO OUR DUTY"... Count on it sir...we know what to do. Semper Fi...Do Or DIE,..."Unit, Corps, God, Country"
It's amazing how so many people are not thankful for US participation in World War 2. The Pacific, Western European, and Mediterranean fronts were won thanks to the United States army. Where the army didn't win, the economic and manufacturing power of the US came to the rescue, including in part to Russia for the early years. History shows US did its part, regardless of what ignorant fools think.
@mikesaninjakillr How about when the "Black Watch" took off running down the Mississippi toward New Orleans????..they ran so fast the rabbits couldn;t catch em
@uafchris Vietnam happend long after patton died, and 1812 was a victory only in the sense that Great Britain did not take back control of the new United States, but they left us so crippled that it is often viewed as a loss (although some argue that if we "lossed" 1812 we would still be under British rule).
@uafchris Vietnam was not a war. It was a Police action. The US could not enter North Vietnam, only defend the South. The War of 1812 was the second ass kicking England took from the United States, you dumb SOB.
@ironhardt Vietnam was a war, a bloody illegal war in which us soldiers frequently killed Vietnamese civilians, Korea was the police action not Vietnam. The war of 1812 was an American defeat ill think youll find. The US tried to invade Canada and lost, it got its capital burnt down, its economy crippled and was forced to sue for peace. It was Americas first real war and it got its ass kicked.
@uafchris We fucked the british in new orleans and God fucked them in washington. They one a major battle in washington then the weather killed many of their troops. Muahahhaha
@uafchris If I remember Washington and Rochambeau sent Cornwallis back across the ocean with his tail between his legs. The UK lost both conflicts with the US.
@HaggenPagan26 No, Britain won the war of 1812. America lost, and lost badly. Your capital was burnt down, your invasions of Canada were routed and your economy crippled. If I'm not mistaken a few outnumbered Brits and Canadians kicked the american army's arse.
@uafchris If I am not mistaken, Britain got her ass sent back across the Atlantic, and America remained an independent country, free from the rule of the crown. Britain lost the War of 1812 dumbshit.
@HaggenPagan26 The war of 1812 was about America trying to invade Canada not Britain trying to invade the US. The Americans got their asses handed to them. It was a British victory.
@uafchris Britain was trying to tamper with America's progression as a country. America won Michigan, and kicked the British out of the Great Lakes. Canada was not desirable. Most of Canada is unlivable. Britain and America compromised on territory. And the last Battle of the War, in New Orleans, Jackson kicked the shit out of the Nancyboy British.
@uafchris You do realize that you are reverting back to America's infancy? The US military has evolved since then. These were the days when militias were still being used because a National Army was not large or efficient enough. Back in those days. What was the difference between a Brit and an American?
@uafchris No side won really. It was ended by a the Treaty of Ghent. However, the news didn't reach the battle of New Orleans until after the battle which the Americans won.
@uafchris I take it you haven't read the Treaty of Ghent. Virtually even concession was given the the Americans because the British got their asses kicked.
@jigglypiggly Did the treaty had over Canada to the US? No. Did it end impressment? No. Did the American army and navy suffer humiliating defeats? Yes. Is Canada still part of the British commonwealth to this day? Yes.
Suffering significantly more casualties and failing to achieve its main aims does not mean under any circumstances America won the war. Britain defeated Americas repeated invasions, got a peace agreement and then got on with beating Napoleon= British victory.
@uafchris Fact of the matter is, we took just as much land as you did. You had a gigantic empire, and the largest navy at the time and still could only fight to a draw. Read about the Great Lakes campaigns, & Creek war, both saw the British losses.
Most British troops were lost to combat than American troops, whereas more American troops died from disease.
Got on with beating Napoleon? LOL, they need a coalition United Kingdom, Russia, Prussia, Sweden, Austria and they still almost lost.
The US actually suffered more KIA in the war. Also almost the entire British army and navy were tied down fighting the French in Europe, yet the relatively huge American army still failed to invade Canada despite it being guarded by just a tiny force. As for Napoleon, Nelson wiped out the French fleet and Wellingtons army drove the frogs back across Portugal, Spain and Belgium completely undefeated.
America won some campaigns but it doesn't mean they won the war, they didnt get Canada.
@uafchris Slightly more, while Britain had less men, they were better trained and equipped while American had more militia forces, and they still lost. Britain stopped raiding American ships, stopped the trade embargo, and stopped financing the Native Americans, which is all that Madison wanted.
Canada was an unlivable shit hole at the time, and still is by most accounts.
Napoleon lost because of the massive coalition and the weather. Simple.
"America won some campaigns..." Listen Brit, England invaded in 1812 and got they ass kicked. "America didn't take Canada." What's the matter with your history book. America neither started the war nor attempted an invasion of Canada. England started the war, got their ass kicked, and left. Just say 'thank you' for both world wars, and I'll say, "You're welcome. Cheers!"
@bitmopro Your ignorance is fucking unbelievable. The war started when America launched several repeated invasions of Canada. They thought it would be easy pickings as almost the entire the British army was in Spain, but this turned out to be a massive mistake and the Americans got their ass kicked. As for WW1, america did hardly anything, and in WW2 the US abandoned Britain and the allies and only arrived in Europe 3 and a half years late due to pearl harbour, after the allies were winning.
@uafchris "after the allies were winning." I just have to correct you there. After the Soviets were winning, Soviet were never part of the allies, and the allies (UK & CO) had their hands full with defending themselves.
But yeah, US only played a minor role in the european part of WW2, but good luck getting the avrage american to understand that.
@1TtidnaB I meant the allies (UK, Commonwealth, Greece, France) were pushing the Germans back at El Alamein before the US arrived. In WW1 they had relatively minor role and in WW2 they had a lesser role up until Normandy, but by then Germans had already been crushed in Russia, so the US cant really claim to have saved everyone.
Where did you read your history? In WWI the United States played a huge roll as it practically saved the United Kingdoms economy by helping to fix their debt. Oh I'm sorry I didn't know Russia was in South Africa fighting a Elite Panzer Group or had to go through a invasion of Sicily and Italy and finally another beach head to break the lines on D-Day to take back France and went on to only being a few hundred miles from Berlin before being cut off by supplies sent to Montgomery.
@FordGTGuy People forget in WWI, we were dealing with our own problems because we had just been invaded by rebels from the Mexican Revolution. Pancho Villa's second in command Julio Cardenas was shot and killed by a young US Cavalry Officer armed with two Ivory handled revolvers, named "George S. Patton."
@southparkfan2717 Your forgetting the part where when Patton came across the border, he had Cardenas' body strapped to the hood of his jeep like a deer. That....was awesome.
Between 1945-1949 the USA was the sole nuclear power on the face of the earth. Russia needs to get down on it knees and thank their non-existent God that the USA didn't behave like they would have if they had been in that position. Stalin butchered 40 million compared to Hitler's 20 million. With atomic weapons Stalin would've murdered hundreds of millions. Only another communist despot (Mao) killed more people than Stalin.
@KaiserReich98 Were it not for russia, The war would have gone very different, I see you know your history, Well spoken. All nations played a part, but Russia turned the tide more than any other! and they lost MORE than any other Tenfold!
@FordGTGuy lol, south africa what? :') You obviously forget that the war could not have been won without the Russians either. It was a combined effort.
@FordGTGuy Agreed, the United States was unsure whether or not to enter the war because of the idea "Europe is just squabbling over themselves and have been for 100s of years" It is true. Ever since the Napoleonic era, the rise of Italy, Germany, Serbia, and then World War 1... the Arab revolt, the Russian revolution, and the American intervention. I can see why America was hesitant to join both world wars...
It is pretty well known the only thing that kept Russia from being destroyed was it's frigid weather playing hell on German tanks and soldiers and the movement of German forces to protect against a invasion from the West and South. That's right during D-Day Germany moved troops south to protect against a invasion from Italy because we setup a phantom army ran by Patton, that terrified the Germans so much they let their guard down and allowed for D-Day to happen.
@FordGTGuy Sort of, the fake army was in Kent to try and fool the Germans into thinking the invasion would be further north than Normandy around Calais. The trick they did in Italy was operation mincemeat the year earlier, when they pretended the allies were going to land in Greece instead of Italy.
What is that a joke? If it wasn't for involvement by the United States prewar in providing supplies to the United Kingdom they would have been crippled before we ever entered the war. As far as Naval warfare yes we did not play as much of a major role in the Atlantic ocean but as far as ground assaults we had the most powerful army in the European theater. If it wasn't for the cut off of supplies given to Montgomery Patton would've been in Berlin way before the Russians.
You can point any Army in the world that existed during WWII against Patton's 3rd Army and they would have been rolled over as shown as how Patton managed to break all German lines and beat off the Elite Panzer Groups and was only hundreds of miles away from Berlin before his supplies were cut.
@FordGTGuy Well, Patton only went up against understrenght and badly supplied divisions, while having massive air and artillery support, and was fully stocked on supplies, equiptment and reinforcements. The brits had already hammered the small africa corps, italy was a walk in the park and the german army had already been beaten in russia by the time of overlord. Going up against a full strengt and fully supported german army, pattons lower quality troops would have been slaugthered.
Is that why at Kasserine Pass under British command the American troops were crushed. Until Patton came and with the same Army that was defeated he defeated Rommel's Elite Panzer Group at Kasserine Pass in his first battle of WWII.
Patton had good support because he was a good general he knew how important air and artillery support were, you have no idea what you're talking about Patton's 3rd Army obliterated every German force it came across.
@FordGTGuy I can beat up a wounded man easily, that doesent make me great.
Patton had a full, fresh and heavily supported army against small broken unsupported and unsupplied divisions. I get it, you wanna stick your tounge up Pattons asshole, but your fanboy mentality is pathetic. If Pattons met an army with the same numbers, supplies and support - his low quality troops would have broken fast.
Is that why the Germans feared Patton so much that they moved their forces towards Italy before D-Day to protect against a fake Army that was put in leaked intel to the Germans?
You really need to actually look over the history of the war...
@FordGTGuy No, my previous comment has nothing to do with that, at all.
Patton was a mediocre general who lead a superior force against exhausted fragments. I would rather credit the german generals who did so much with so little late in the war.
@uafchris US Expansionism was only a small part of the cause of the War of 1812. Among other reasons, British support for Indian raids, Britain impeding US trade with France, the Chesapeake-Leopard Affair, and the seizure of numerous American ships.
As usual, your history books cast your enemy as the bad guy, while your country did nothing wrong and won the war single underhandedly. Read some non-biased accounts of the war and come back.
Vietnam was a conflict and never a official war and we didn't lose the war of 1812. A loss of the war would mean you either were defeated out right or surrendered neither happened.
@FordGTGuy The Vietnam war was never a war, hundredtousands just happend to get shot and bombed to death as large organized military forces clashed, flawless logic there mister.
Also, The war in Iraq was over in a few days apparently, there is no war in afganistan - we are just there to give them democracy and there was no war in libya - just a "no fly zone".
Why are people that follow certain political ideologies so afraid of calling war for war?
You do realize that in order to be considered a true war that congress must approve of it, congress never declared war with Vietnam so it was a conflict.
MY DAD FOUGHT UNDER PATTON AND SAID BECAUSE OF THE PRES THEN PATTON WAS TAKEN OUT ,AND IF PATTON HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO DO HIS JOB THINGS WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFF
I love Patton and thanks to whoever put this video up. my dad used to quote it to me when i was a little kid. fond memories. And then I went on to be a 13 fox. i still love this damned speech .. sons of bitches :)
This sounds like the teaching of the Eastern Orthodox Church. We must fight Islam where ever it is. To Fight for our right to survive is a great fight. May Serbia be free to take back her homeland!
"No army ever won a war by dying for their country. They won the war by making the other poor bastard die for his country." How true, General, how very true....and no talk about collateral damage. Get in it to WIN it.
I believe, had General Patton lived to see this movie, he'd have wished he'd had George C. Scott's voice....I also believe that George C. Scott wished he sounded more like Patton actually did.
At any rate....we need someone, anyone, with Patton's internal strenght of purpose to eradicate the stain that now sits smuggly in the white house.
"In June 1916, Lieutenant George S. Patton raided a small community and killed Julio Cárdenas, an important leader in the Villista military organization, and two other men. Patton personally killed Cardenas, and is reported to have carved notches into his revolvers." tied their bodies to the hood of his scout car and drove back to HQ
@USMarineRifleman0311 All that was true,but Patton always carried dual colt 45's with real PEARL GRIPS.He might have carved groves into another gun but not his own Pearl Grips.Hitler put a bounty on Patton for 5 million bucks."Who could ever kill the man with the Pearl Grips"-Hitler
Patton was murdered by the zionists and cia. he said 'we backed the wrong side' after ww2
its funny how the same person who 'accidentally' ploughed into pattons car in the 'accident' was the same that immediately took over his 15th army .. coincidence ?
after world war 2 he made statements exposing the zionist jews infiltrating usa politics and the media, and their lies about the holocaust. just go google 'patton we backed the wrong side' and you will find these quotes in his diary.
My favorite bit "I actually feel sorry for the poor bastards we're going up against. We're not just going to shoot the bastard, we're going to cut out their living guts and use them to grease the treads of our tanks. We're going to murder those lousy hun bastards by the bushel!" We should have that attitude towards the terrorists.
MrFishman55 2 weeks ago 4
I don't know if anyone who's watched the Patton movie and this clip realizes that the words spoken were from a real speech given by the real Gen. Patton. Maybe not 100% word for word, but amazingly close. There's a Patton website on the internet with the actual words of the speech and you'd be impressed by how close the movie was to the real thing.
crucisnh 3 weeks ago
How he opens it is the best!! "I want you to remember....that no bastard ever won a war by dying for his country....he won it...by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country." IT IS A TOP MOVIE QUOTE!!! But won't be viewed as that w/ our "liberal society" WAKE UP AMERICA!!! We have enemies and have to go to war...I piss on these peace activists and I'm still in my 20's...I PISS ON MY GENERATION!!!!
MINIeminemFAN 4 weeks ago
15 people shovels shit in lousiana
MrKarki321 4 weeks ago
I do love the immense amount of trolling on this video. It's just plump for the taking.
BlueRoyalProductions 1 month ago
THIS IS A LEADER!!!! R.I.P. Patton...wish you would rise up and get rid of this joke of a PRESIDENT!!!
MINIeminemFAN 1 month ago 3
"I made myself memorize this speech in high school! I even admired him alongside "Chesty" and I'm a US Marine!"
MrWINNSLAW 1 month ago
When you put your hand into a bunch of goo that a moment before was your best friends face... you'll know what to do. George S. Patton
Voltron1774 1 month ago
As a big liberal I despise war. BUT, if there must be war let the full power of democracy be unholstered and turn on it's enemy. If I were a president I would want the meanest, toughtest, most aggressive SOB to head my army IN THE FIELD, like Patton. Make him answer to an administrator with a cool head, otherwise leave him alone. I'll bet FDR, another big liberal felt the same way.
oneputtsteven 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" And I would be proud.... to lead you wonderful guys into battle anytime.... anywhere."
So Epic!
StonewallJackson26 1 month ago
Comment removed
StonewallJackson26 1 month ago
Nobody has won anything defending it. George S. Patton.
MegaNima2011 1 month ago
God bless George S. Patton. The general is probably raising hell in the here after.
stammlager5 1 month ago
Lol all I see are a bunch of Europeans downplaying Americas troops. WW1, WW2, Cold War all achieved victory through America. In 30 years when you guys have another civil war, your pussy asses will call for America again.
shiz777 1 month ago
I love Patton...best Military Movie of all TIME!!! 1:20...best QUOTE!!!! GOD BLESS THE U.S.A!!!!
MINIeminemFAN 1 month ago
1:42 to 2:36 is the perfect refutation to Ron Paul!
General David Petraeus is an awesome general--but he's kind of on the "soft-spoken" side. Chances are, we'd never hear from him an in-your-FACE speech like this. Shame, that.
RushLimborg 1 month ago
@RushLimborg I'm not a fan of Paul, but no, it isn't. It seriously is not.
tommylehman 1 month ago
@RushLimborg Give it 8 years and he'll be President Petreaus.
Willis2992 1 month ago
@Willis2992 That would be awesome, I'd say! I suspect the reason Obama made him CIA chief was to keep a potential threat close...as there were some rumblings on the GOP side, on drafting the general to be the Republican candidate for president.
Imagine--our generation's Ike....
RushLimborg 1 month ago
@RushLimborg Yeah definitely. Never believe someone when they say they have no political ambitions. If the Reps lose the coming election in November, they will do everything in their power to draft him in as the next candidate.
Willis2992 1 month ago
That was a good movie.
schmuckenheimer9 2 months ago
Patton and MacArthur would of had summer houses in China if it weren't for Truman..!
And thus more Wal Marts .. and the Russians would by now have running water..
eric555z 2 months ago
@eric555z And Beijing would have been turned into a giant radioactive parking lot.
Nighthawke70 2 months ago
R. Lee Emery didn't learn a thing from George Patton. Emery is a Marine; Patton was a soldier. There's a world of difference.
Ulleval73 2 months ago
America should have paid more attention to this man, rather than coddling the Bolshevics.
tanksbb 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
uh you guys are all dumb, the united states was never involved in WW2
aobt1407 2 months ago
@aobt1407 No, actually, you're the dumb one.
Why don't you read up on it?
StillOBSESSED 2 months ago
@aobt1407 You're not serious, are you?
rprince418 1 month ago
R. Lee Emery's character in Full Metal Jacket learned everything he knows from this man.
shutthefuckup654 2 months ago 2
"We're not just gonna shoot the bastards....we're gonna cut out their living guts, and use them to grease the treads of our tanks! We're gonna murder those lousy Hun bastards, by the bushel!"
* a few seconds later..
" ....we're gonna hold onto him by the nose, and kick him in the ass, we're gonna kick the hell outta him all the time, and we're gonna go through him like crap through a goose!!"
LEGENDARY.
LightInTheDarkness96 2 months ago
Patton, 1941, WWII
"That’s why Americans have never lost and will never lose a war. Because the very thought of losing is hateful to Americans."
Patton's ghost, 1975, Vietnam War
"F***!!"
TheVoiceOfReason93 2 months ago
@TheVoiceOfReason93 The US never "lost" the Vietnam War but simply left due to high political propagandas cuz of hippies and wimps wanted the war to stop. The US were winning that war but simply just left it thats all, but yeah I guess Patton's ghost would probably yell
"F***!!"
bda617 2 months ago
@bda617 He'd be yelling more than that, committing to record more insults and cuss words than anyone would have heard in their lifetime. He'd have commited gross insubordination on such a grand scale that he'd go into the books of Guinness for all time.
No, George would not have tolerated the BS that surrounded 'Nam and the BS tactics they employed that killed solders. He would have pushed to invade, take Hanoi and fix the situation once and for all.
Nighthawke70 2 months ago
@Nighthawke70
There were generals that advocated that. And they didn't because doing that would mean dealing with Russia and China, and even Patton wasn't that bloodthirsty.
harlequin2262 2 months ago
@Nighthawke70 He would have won the war for us single handedly. lol.
rprince418 1 month ago
@Nighthawke70 I wasn't making fun of him btw. I seriously believe that.
rprince418 1 month ago
General Patton must have gone through 15 people like crap through a goose.
1985OldSkool 2 months ago
Like crap through a goose!!
SIRMaleMan 3 months ago
2:27 that's what you think... uh cough cough cough,vietnam, cough cough cough, korea, cough cough cough. he was right about that fightig stuff and americans though.
15speeda 3 months ago
@15speeda other way around, korea then vietnam. But korea wasnt lost, technically still a war, it could continue any moment.
lolackay 3 months ago
@lolackay i know the order, and i'm pretty sure that there isn't a good chance that korea is going to attack amercia any time soon, and since we were the first to leave....
15speeda 3 months ago
@15speeda Here's some Pepto-Bismol lol
LightInTheDarkness96 2 months ago
@15speeda If you actually read up on your history, you would find that we won both Vietnam and Korea. North Vietnam surrendered to America after the Christmas bombings. We then decided to pull out, and left S. Vietnam to defend itself, which quickly fell to the NVA onslaught.
General MacArthur pushed the N. Koreans back from S. Korea all the way up to the Chinese border during the Korean war. Then those politicians demanded he pull back to the 38th parallel. Learn your history!
veritech102 2 months ago
I read that most of the US army preferred General Truscott - just as competent but not as loud!
freebeerfordworkers 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@freebeerfordworkers
what's your point? this was a movie about patton.
15speeda 3 months ago
All this talk of Patton being "fresh" and his enemies being "tired" is pretty hilarious considering that this is a large part (probably the most important part) of military strategy. Patton favored fast movement, scouting, and the use of solid supply lines. He insisted his men were hygenic and properly dressed against environmental hazards. I'm sorry if your video games tell you otherwise, but this is what winning a war is really about.
AuspexAO 3 months ago 2
Comment removed
MichaelkSimmons 3 months ago
It's refreshing to see a real man for a change
Theburn77 3 months ago 2
240p? Really?
Boredclub2ndgen 3 months ago
Why do they play "tot the colors" before his speech? That would mean it's the end of the duty day.
mgreene11111 3 months ago
@mgreene11111 : In a formation like that you have 2 choices To the colors or National Anthem.
davidivey65 3 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
Why is he wearing a helmet liner??
drnone88 3 months ago
Patton used to go out to the front lines...from what I read it got him into trouble, the higher ups did not want to risk losing one of their generals and so didn't want them out on the front lines.
whiskeyify 3 months ago
@whiskeyify Patton came under direct small arms fire during the Lorraine forest campaign /Battle of Metz.. Meeks, Pattons driver, took a wrong turn while out on inspection.
13times 3 months ago
@13times I think I read somewhere that he helped another soldier set-up a Mortar to fire at enemy troops..that's how close he was to enemy lines that day.
whiskeyify 3 months ago
Gen. George Patton, You Sir are still the very best example of what a REAL AMERICAN IS!!! That is, next to Gen. Chesty Puller and Gen. Smedley Butler. "WE WILL ALL DO OUR DUTY"... Count on it sir...we know what to do. Semper Fi...Do Or DIE,..."Unit, Corps, God, Country"
mollymaemorrissey 3 months ago 2
Happy Veterans Day!
logicmyth 3 months ago
And even when we lose wars we kill more than a million of our enemies -_-
Winnetka4 3 months ago
It's amazing how so many people are not thankful for US participation in World War 2. The Pacific, Western European, and Mediterranean fronts were won thanks to the United States army. Where the army didn't win, the economic and manufacturing power of the US came to the rescue, including in part to Russia for the early years. History shows US did its part, regardless of what ignorant fools think.
UBiQproductions 3 months ago 3
One of my favorite historical figures! Hands down!
Godfather91290 3 months ago 25
Insecurity at its very best.
B1ggu5 4 months ago
This intro was my introduction to the US Army in 1972. I will never forget it!
Ricco99100 4 months ago
4:19 shit my pants?
MeNoBites 4 months ago
We still got a piece of canada.
getsomeboy321 4 months ago
New Orleans was 1814. Same war though.
oddsix1 4 months ago
There is another post on here with the Stars and Blue displayed incorrectly! Needs to be removed!
oddsix1 4 months ago
I could not believe some faggots had the audacity to go fucking with this speech.
1Novatrek 4 months ago
I was watching Obama's speech/news conference, I got mad and decided to watch this instead, Damn I feel better all ready!!
albatross7677 4 months ago 2
1812 was almost 200 years ago. America rules.
7ElevenAlphaCentauri 5 months ago
Comment removed
winterPaul19 5 months ago
you people need to take a history lesson
precious1506 5 months ago
We lost every battle in the war of 1812 and the british looted the white house Im pretty sure that counts as a loss.
mikesaninjakillr 5 months ago
@mikesaninjakillr lost the war? I think not. Dipshit
joshman783 5 months ago
@mikesaninjakillr How about when the "Black Watch" took off running down the Mississippi toward New Orleans????..they ran so fast the rabbits couldn;t catch em
ukcatfan36 5 months ago in playlist Herb's sports playlist
@mikesaninjakillr
You might want to actually look at the naval battles we didn't lose every naval conflict, in fact we took a lot of British ships.
FordGTGuy 4 months ago
Patton was a great man and we would be speaking german if we did not have him as the commander of the 3rd armu
low1940 5 months ago
13 people shoveled shit in Louisiana
2112Zeppelin 5 months ago
Comment removed
Crannigy 5 months ago
"Americans have never lost and will never lose a war" What were Vietnam and the war of 1812 then?
uafchris 5 months ago
Comment removed
FoamCups428 5 months ago
@uafchris Those were wars directed by American politicians. The difference between scheming, power-sucking vermin and warriors in the field.
bozz88able 5 months ago
@uafchris are you you serious with the war of 1812? pretty sure we wont that... CHECK OUR NATIONAL ANTHEM....
daruss1489 5 months ago
@uafchris Vietnam happend long after patton died, and 1812 was a victory only in the sense that Great Britain did not take back control of the new United States, but they left us so crippled that it is often viewed as a loss (although some argue that if we "lossed" 1812 we would still be under British rule).
2112Zeppelin 5 months ago
@uafchris Vietnam was not a war. It was a Police action. The US could not enter North Vietnam, only defend the South. The War of 1812 was the second ass kicking England took from the United States, you dumb SOB.
ironhardt 5 months ago
@ironhardt Vietnam was a war, a bloody illegal war in which us soldiers frequently killed Vietnamese civilians, Korea was the police action not Vietnam. The war of 1812 was an American defeat ill think youll find. The US tried to invade Canada and lost, it got its capital burnt down, its economy crippled and was forced to sue for peace. It was Americas first real war and it got its ass kicked.
uafchris 5 months ago
@uafchris We fucked the british in new orleans and God fucked them in washington. They one a major battle in washington then the weather killed many of their troops. Muahahhaha
getsomeboy321 5 months ago
@getsomeboy321 New Orleans was after the war was over. America tried to invade Canada in 1812 and got its ass kicked, that's all that matters.
uafchris 5 months ago
@uafchris If I remember Washington and Rochambeau sent Cornwallis back across the ocean with his tail between his legs. The UK lost both conflicts with the US.
HaggenPagan26 4 months ago
@HaggenPagan26 No, Britain won the war of 1812. America lost, and lost badly. Your capital was burnt down, your invasions of Canada were routed and your economy crippled. If I'm not mistaken a few outnumbered Brits and Canadians kicked the american army's arse.
uafchris 4 months ago
@uafchris If I am not mistaken, Britain got her ass sent back across the Atlantic, and America remained an independent country, free from the rule of the crown. Britain lost the War of 1812 dumbshit.
HaggenPagan26 4 months ago
@HaggenPagan26 The war of 1812 was about America trying to invade Canada not Britain trying to invade the US. The Americans got their asses handed to them. It was a British victory.
uafchris 4 months ago
@uafchris Britain was trying to tamper with America's progression as a country. America won Michigan, and kicked the British out of the Great Lakes. Canada was not desirable. Most of Canada is unlivable. Britain and America compromised on territory. And the last Battle of the War, in New Orleans, Jackson kicked the shit out of the Nancyboy British.
HaggenPagan26 4 months ago
@uafchris You do realize that you are reverting back to America's infancy? The US military has evolved since then. These were the days when militias were still being used because a National Army was not large or efficient enough. Back in those days. What was the difference between a Brit and an American?
HaggenPagan26 4 months ago
@uafchris No side won really. It was ended by a the Treaty of Ghent. However, the news didn't reach the battle of New Orleans until after the battle which the Americans won.
rumrich 4 months ago
@uafchris Ahaha you actually believe Britain won the War of 1812.
What kind of fucked up books are you reading?
jigglypiggly 4 months ago
@uafchris
Is that why Britians navy was crippled?
FordGTGuy 4 months ago
@FordGTGuy Eh? It wasn't crippled, it destroyed the US navy and began raiding your coast at will.
uafchris 4 months ago
@uafchris I take it you haven't read the Treaty of Ghent. Virtually even concession was given the the Americans because the British got their asses kicked.
jigglypiggly 4 months ago
@jigglypiggly Did the treaty had over Canada to the US? No. Did it end impressment? No. Did the American army and navy suffer humiliating defeats? Yes. Is Canada still part of the British commonwealth to this day? Yes.
Suffering significantly more casualties and failing to achieve its main aims does not mean under any circumstances America won the war. Britain defeated Americas repeated invasions, got a peace agreement and then got on with beating Napoleon= British victory.
uafchris 4 months ago
@uafchris Fact of the matter is, we took just as much land as you did. You had a gigantic empire, and the largest navy at the time and still could only fight to a draw. Read about the Great Lakes campaigns, & Creek war, both saw the British losses.
Most British troops were lost to combat than American troops, whereas more American troops died from disease.
Got on with beating Napoleon? LOL, they need a coalition United Kingdom, Russia, Prussia, Sweden, Austria and they still almost lost.
jigglypiggly 4 months ago
The US actually suffered more KIA in the war. Also almost the entire British army and navy were tied down fighting the French in Europe, yet the relatively huge American army still failed to invade Canada despite it being guarded by just a tiny force. As for Napoleon, Nelson wiped out the French fleet and Wellingtons army drove the frogs back across Portugal, Spain and Belgium completely undefeated.
America won some campaigns but it doesn't mean they won the war, they didnt get Canada.
uafchris 4 months ago
@uafchris Slightly more, while Britain had less men, they were better trained and equipped while American had more militia forces, and they still lost. Britain stopped raiding American ships, stopped the trade embargo, and stopped financing the Native Americans, which is all that Madison wanted.
Canada was an unlivable shit hole at the time, and still is by most accounts.
Napoleon lost because of the massive coalition and the weather. Simple.
jigglypiggly 4 months ago
@uafchris
"America won some campaigns..." Listen Brit, England invaded in 1812 and got they ass kicked. "America didn't take Canada." What's the matter with your history book. America neither started the war nor attempted an invasion of Canada. England started the war, got their ass kicked, and left. Just say 'thank you' for both world wars, and I'll say, "You're welcome. Cheers!"
bitmopro 4 months ago
@bitmopro Your ignorance is fucking unbelievable. The war started when America launched several repeated invasions of Canada. They thought it would be easy pickings as almost the entire the British army was in Spain, but this turned out to be a massive mistake and the Americans got their ass kicked. As for WW1, america did hardly anything, and in WW2 the US abandoned Britain and the allies and only arrived in Europe 3 and a half years late due to pearl harbour, after the allies were winning.
uafchris 4 months ago
@uafchris "after the allies were winning." I just have to correct you there. After the Soviets were winning, Soviet were never part of the allies, and the allies (UK & CO) had their hands full with defending themselves.
But yeah, US only played a minor role in the european part of WW2, but good luck getting the avrage american to understand that.
1TtidnaB 4 months ago
@1TtidnaB I meant the allies (UK, Commonwealth, Greece, France) were pushing the Germans back at El Alamein before the US arrived. In WW1 they had relatively minor role and in WW2 they had a lesser role up until Normandy, but by then Germans had already been crushed in Russia, so the US cant really claim to have saved everyone.
uafchris 4 months ago
@uafchris
Where did you read your history? In WWI the United States played a huge roll as it practically saved the United Kingdoms economy by helping to fix their debt. Oh I'm sorry I didn't know Russia was in South Africa fighting a Elite Panzer Group or had to go through a invasion of Sicily and Italy and finally another beach head to break the lines on D-Day to take back France and went on to only being a few hundred miles from Berlin before being cut off by supplies sent to Montgomery.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago 13
@FordGTGuy People forget in WWI, we were dealing with our own problems because we had just been invaded by rebels from the Mexican Revolution. Pancho Villa's second in command Julio Cardenas was shot and killed by a young US Cavalry Officer armed with two Ivory handled revolvers, named "George S. Patton."
southparkfan2717 1 month ago
@southparkfan2717 Your forgetting the part where when Patton came across the border, he had Cardenas' body strapped to the hood of his jeep like a deer. That....was awesome.
AlaricRose 1 month ago
@FordGTGuy You mean North Africa?
StonewallJackson26 1 month ago
@StonewallJackson26 Shh...he's on a roll.
rprince418 1 month ago
@FordGTGuy Russia played a much, MUCH larger role in the defeat of Germany than the US did.
KaiserReich98 1 month ago
@KaiserReich98
Between 1945-1949 the USA was the sole nuclear power on the face of the earth. Russia needs to get down on it knees and thank their non-existent God that the USA didn't behave like they would have if they had been in that position. Stalin butchered 40 million compared to Hitler's 20 million. With atomic weapons Stalin would've murdered hundreds of millions. Only another communist despot (Mao) killed more people than Stalin.
TimSchohdesmoines 1 month ago
@TimSchohdesmoines What does that have to do with the defeat of Germany in WWII? did you even read my comment?
KaiserReich98 1 month ago
@KaiserReich98 Were it not for russia, The war would have gone very different, I see you know your history, Well spoken. All nations played a part, but Russia turned the tide more than any other! and they lost MORE than any other Tenfold!
Juggalo5588 3 weeks ago
@FordGTGuy lol, south africa what? :') You obviously forget that the war could not have been won without the Russians either. It was a combined effort.
kenserhoofje 3 weeks ago
@FordGTGuy Agreed, the United States was unsure whether or not to enter the war because of the idea "Europe is just squabbling over themselves and have been for 100s of years" It is true. Ever since the Napoleonic era, the rise of Italy, Germany, Serbia, and then World War 1... the Arab revolt, the Russian revolution, and the American intervention. I can see why America was hesitant to join both world wars...
Redsarcov1 3 weeks ago
@uafchris
It is pretty well known the only thing that kept Russia from being destroyed was it's frigid weather playing hell on German tanks and soldiers and the movement of German forces to protect against a invasion from the West and South. That's right during D-Day Germany moved troops south to protect against a invasion from Italy because we setup a phantom army ran by Patton, that terrified the Germans so much they let their guard down and allowed for D-Day to happen.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
@FordGTGuy Sort of, the fake army was in Kent to try and fool the Germans into thinking the invasion would be further north than Normandy around Calais. The trick they did in Italy was operation mincemeat the year earlier, when they pretended the allies were going to land in Greece instead of Italy.
uafchris 3 months ago
@1TtidnaB
What is that a joke? If it wasn't for involvement by the United States prewar in providing supplies to the United Kingdom they would have been crippled before we ever entered the war. As far as Naval warfare yes we did not play as much of a major role in the Atlantic ocean but as far as ground assaults we had the most powerful army in the European theater. If it wasn't for the cut off of supplies given to Montgomery Patton would've been in Berlin way before the Russians.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago 2
You can point any Army in the world that existed during WWII against Patton's 3rd Army and they would have been rolled over as shown as how Patton managed to break all German lines and beat off the Elite Panzer Groups and was only hundreds of miles away from Berlin before his supplies were cut.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
@FordGTGuy Well, Patton only went up against understrenght and badly supplied divisions, while having massive air and artillery support, and was fully stocked on supplies, equiptment and reinforcements. The brits had already hammered the small africa corps, italy was a walk in the park and the german army had already been beaten in russia by the time of overlord. Going up against a full strengt and fully supported german army, pattons lower quality troops would have been slaugthered.
1TtidnaB 3 months ago
@1TtidnaB
Is that why at Kasserine Pass under British command the American troops were crushed. Until Patton came and with the same Army that was defeated he defeated Rommel's Elite Panzer Group at Kasserine Pass in his first battle of WWII.
Patton had good support because he was a good general he knew how important air and artillery support were, you have no idea what you're talking about Patton's 3rd Army obliterated every German force it came across.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
@FordGTGuy I can beat up a wounded man easily, that doesent make me great.
Patton had a full, fresh and heavily supported army against small broken unsupported and unsupplied divisions. I get it, you wanna stick your tounge up Pattons asshole, but your fanboy mentality is pathetic. If Pattons met an army with the same numbers, supplies and support - his low quality troops would have broken fast.
1TtidnaB 3 months ago
@1TtidnaB
Is that why the Germans feared Patton so much that they moved their forces towards Italy before D-Day to protect against a fake Army that was put in leaked intel to the Germans?
You really need to actually look over the history of the war...
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
@FordGTGuy No, my previous comment has nothing to do with that, at all.
Patton was a mediocre general who lead a superior force against exhausted fragments. I would rather credit the german generals who did so much with so little late in the war.
1TtidnaB 3 months ago
@uafchris US Expansionism was only a small part of the cause of the War of 1812. Among other reasons, British support for Indian raids, Britain impeding US trade with France, the Chesapeake-Leopard Affair, and the seizure of numerous American ships.
As usual, your history books cast your enemy as the bad guy, while your country did nothing wrong and won the war single underhandedly. Read some non-biased accounts of the war and come back.
jigglypiggly 4 months ago
@uafchris
Vietnam was a conflict and never a official war and we didn't lose the war of 1812. A loss of the war would mean you either were defeated out right or surrendered neither happened.
FordGTGuy 4 months ago
@FordGTGuy The Vietnam war was never a war, hundredtousands just happend to get shot and bombed to death as large organized military forces clashed, flawless logic there mister.
Also, The war in Iraq was over in a few days apparently, there is no war in afganistan - we are just there to give them democracy and there was no war in libya - just a "no fly zone".
Why are people that follow certain political ideologies so afraid of calling war for war?
1TtidnaB 4 months ago
@1TtidnaB
You do realize that in order to be considered a true war that congress must approve of it, congress never declared war with Vietnam so it was a conflict.
FordGTGuy 3 months ago
@FordGTGuy We didn't lose Vietnam. The NVA surrendered, and then we pulled out. South Vietnam lost the war.
veritech102 3 months ago
AMERICA!!
tylerltz400 5 months ago
why is the boob trick a suggestion?
MrKrazyballs 5 months ago 30
@MrKrazyballs Because both Patton and boobs are awesome?
dcbandnerd 4 months ago
13 people are holding their position.
campagnollo 5 months ago
@aguyfromTennessee But the Office of Strategic Services was not the Central Intelligence Agency. The OSS was a precursor to the CIA.
FoamCups428 6 months ago
I've heard people blame the Jews for a lot of things, but killing Patton? That's a new one.
By the way, the CIA didn't exist in 1945.
46spoony 6 months ago
A god, Patton was.
SPQRImperator 6 months ago
MY DAD FOUGHT UNDER PATTON AND SAID BECAUSE OF THE PRES THEN PATTON WAS TAKEN OUT ,AND IF PATTON HAD BEEN ALLOWED TO DO HIS JOB THINGS WOULD HAVE BEEN DIFF
04therebellady 6 months ago
@04therebellady
fuck off fagot
aallppiinnee 6 months ago
02:30 except when the lost the war of 1812
dmax631 6 months ago
Comment removed
jte2457 6 months ago
@jte2457 you're a deluded idiot. get your head out of your backside
dmax631 6 months ago
@dmax631 hey asshole go F%*# Yourself
jte2457 6 months ago
@dmax631 You think we lost it wasn't won or lost but they never got our country so we won in our view.
jacobwolf124 6 months ago
11 poor dumb bastards died for their countries.
nottheissue1 6 months ago
George C. Scott that played as Patton was a U.S.Marine "Once a Marine Always a Marine"
Richard1222ify 6 months ago
11 people were were gone through like crap through a goose.
practicalwhacktical 7 months ago
I love Patton and thanks to whoever put this video up. my dad used to quote it to me when i was a little kid. fond memories. And then I went on to be a 13 fox. i still love this damned speech .. sons of bitches :)
13Fthirteenfox 7 months ago
We need leaders like him today. Raghead problem solved.
JoezVendetta 7 months ago
This sounds like the teaching of the Eastern Orthodox Church. We must fight Islam where ever it is. To Fight for our right to survive is a great fight. May Serbia be free to take back her homeland!
JohnTheHutDweller 7 months ago
@JohnTheHutDweller think he was talking about nazis Einstein, not hadjis.
13Fthirteenfox 7 months ago
@13Fthirteenfox that's why I prefaced with "Sounds Like". understand now?
JohnTheHutDweller 7 months ago
They weren't pearl handled revolvers." Only a cheap pimp in a new orleans whore house would have pearl handled revolvers. Theyre ivory"
Michael117american 7 months ago
@Michael117american I love this quote I first heard it from my father when I was at the age of seven years
JohnTheHutDweller 7 months ago
@Michael117american Damn straight.
chaozengine 7 months ago
lol, he rails against individuality, a core American value during the cold war.
Bluehawk2008 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"No army ever won a war by dying for their country. They won the war by making the other poor bastard die for his country." How true, General, how very true....and no talk about collateral damage. Get in it to WIN it.
daniel14251 7 months ago
This movie shows we were still patriotic even in the Hippie infested 70s
umofou 8 months ago
General Smedley Butler, now he was a hero.
draoi99 8 months ago
I wish we had a General that would say this about the Pakistani's that are harboring the evil ones.
RoninShinobi88 8 months ago 2
I believe, had General Patton lived to see this movie, he'd have wished he'd had George C. Scott's voice....I also believe that George C. Scott wished he sounded more like Patton actually did.
At any rate....we need someone, anyone, with Patton's internal strenght of purpose to eradicate the stain that now sits smuggly in the white house.
fondew2004 8 months ago
@fondew2004 Patton's real voice was extremely high-pitched, like a grandmother's. I doubt Scott would have wanted it.
BleedingEyesMurphy 7 months ago
"In June 1916, Lieutenant George S. Patton raided a small community and killed Julio Cárdenas, an important leader in the Villista military organization, and two other men. Patton personally killed Cardenas, and is reported to have carved notches into his revolvers." tied their bodies to the hood of his scout car and drove back to HQ
USMarineRifleman0311 8 months ago 23
@USMarineRifleman0311 All that was true,but Patton always carried dual colt 45's with real PEARL GRIPS.He might have carved groves into another gun but not his own Pearl Grips.Hitler put a bounty on Patton for 5 million bucks."Who could ever kill the man with the Pearl Grips"-Hitler
twetty291 7 months ago
@USMarineRifleman0311 THANK YOU SIR
The253King 6 months ago
Patton was murdered by the zionists and cia. he said 'we backed the wrong side' after ww2
its funny how the same person who 'accidentally' ploughed into pattons car in the 'accident' was the same that immediately took over his 15th army .. coincidence ?
after world war 2 he made statements exposing the zionist jews infiltrating usa politics and the media, and their lies about the holocaust. just go google 'patton we backed the wrong side' and you will find these quotes in his diary.
Mohsin77 6 months ago
@Mohsin77
theres nothing we can do about that buddy
The cold war was eventually won, its what Patton wouldve wanted, only it was prolongued and better tought through costing a shitload less lives.
USMarineRifleman0311 6 months ago