If You expect 8 cores cpu to be 100 % faster or double the speed when comparing to 4 core cpu, you are completely wrong
To guive you a example a normal i7 without being overclocked can do this test in 52s wich is good , my cpu without any overclock can do this 1:10s , which means, the small difference is not even a 20% difference in performance dispite having double the cores
lol are you crazy do we really need to put your regular processor that is over clocked to my 980x in real world multi threaded apps to show the difference?
Something is wrong with your i7 if it does the test at the same speed at 3.0 GHz and 4.0 GHz. On my i7, at 4.2 Ghz, my cinebench rendered in 36 seconds as in my video I'm posting as a video response. 54 seconds at 2.8 ghz, then 36 seconds at 4.2ghz
My AMD Athlon X4 640 @ 3,0GHz need 49 Seconds (17688 CB-CPU)
SapphireHD5850Xtreme 8 months ago
my Qx9650 quad core extrem @3870mhz takes also 53
niceboy60 1 year ago
@niceboy60
sure but against a i7 or my 980x it can't render as good and that is a fact LOL will take ages to render on a regular quad =x
IRud3Bwoy 1 year ago
@IRud3Bwoy
If You expect 8 cores cpu to be 100 % faster or double the speed when comparing to 4 core cpu, you are completely wrong
To guive you a example a normal i7 without being overclocked can do this test in 52s wich is good , my cpu without any overclock can do this 1:10s , which means, the small difference is not even a 20% difference in performance dispite having double the cores
niceboy60 1 year ago
@niceboy60
lol are you crazy do we really need to put your regular processor that is over clocked to my 980x in real world multi threaded apps to show the difference?
IRud3Bwoy 1 year ago
hey nice vid, how does the I7 score against your old Q9550? i am thinking of going I7 as i do alot of rendering. cheers
karlos218 2 years ago
i got 55 seconds on a corei7 860 stock
beachzone2 2 years ago
Something is wrong with your i7 if it does the test at the same speed at 3.0 GHz and 4.0 GHz. On my i7, at 4.2 Ghz, my cinebench rendered in 36 seconds as in my video I'm posting as a video response. 54 seconds at 2.8 ghz, then 36 seconds at 4.2ghz
Remoth000 2 years ago
to be honest 4.0 oc performance does not justify the oc it is a waste to be honest.
IRud3Bwoy 2 years ago
A waste of what? If you have cooling that can handle it, why not overclock as far as you can? Overclocking is technically free performance gains.
Remoth000 2 years ago
eh everything i use my pc for i have seen no gains at a 4.0 ghz oc LOL.just a waste oc and to have your e peen bigger.
IRud3Bwoy 2 years ago
you def have something wrong as i said i do it in 35 secs
chevguy502 2 years ago
yup fucked i do it in 35 seconds he has something wrong
chevguy502 2 years ago
You said in the description "very impressive oppose to my old quad core q9550 or q9450"
So why say you have never tried with the 9550?
Not having a go, it would just be usefull information for someone wanting to upgrade like myself
rebellionrob 2 years ago
everything i did on the q9550 can't compare to the i7
video editing,multi tasking etc,gaming not much but the i7 is still worth it
IRud3Bwoy 2 years ago
how much did it take wit q9550
flashfith 2 years ago
never tried with the q9550
IRud3Bwoy 2 years ago
hey IRud3Bwoy can you please tell me the name of this song. :)
Girsheliz 2 years ago 2
drowning pool bodies
IRud3Bwoy 2 years ago
thx
Girsheliz 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
h8 this song!
murreboy 2 years ago