Watch Loose change vs Popular mechanics. The difference, is that this time the people from Popular Mechanics are prepared and make Avery and his friend look like immature children. They're points are so easily debunked it's funny.
@nateium Debate? you need to watch that again and try listening this time. FIRST, thing he says, is in reference to providing the source of the information used to compile the report on the DNA of the 19 highjackers. That assclown couldnt even do that, so why not ask him directly since he wont allow you to go look at ALL of the raw data/info/research that was utilized to reach their proposed conclusion.
@xinecallaw He isn't going to talk to every clown that calls him. This isn't ownage, he just didn't want to deal with another nutbag that's calls him when he has other things to do. He responded professionally and gave him the number of his media representative. It's just not appropriate to call people who don't know you and expect them to enter a debate and answer your questions.
Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned!
Davin was not owned. He knows from experience that it is a complete waste of time to argue with a "9/11 truther." And he's at work, doing his job. It's not his job to talk to every single truther out there. That's why he wrote the book debunking all the 9/11 myths.
well i've changed my mind, i've just tried to watched a bunch videos and all of us truthers are douchebags, we are wrong. there is probably some sort of conspiracy to all this but we're way off.
I have watched it...its great, because thats not true at all, the guys from popular mechanics keep going off topic and dont expalin all their "evidence". They just continue to describe and scrutinize any conspiracy theorists when they are about to be proven wrong hahaha lol
@emerican122189 Good job seeing and hearing what you want, like always. Not sure if you noticed, but you're truther posterboy scum friends acted like complete children and giggled every time someone from the magazine was speaking. You're friend Jason was pathetic, and couldn't control himself at all, which is very typical of someone who is losing an argument and can't give a relevant response.The PM people were mature and spoke clearly and calmly, and rebutted each point thrown at them.
I have watched it...its great, because thats not true at all, the guys from popular mechanics keep going off topic and dont expalin all their "evidence". They just continue to describe and scrutinize any conspiracy theorists when they are about to be proven wrong hahaha lol
@FnkDctr cos that makes sense, did you know, i was actually just paid to write that comment (and this one) to try and make you think the government did it by using reverse psychology.... and i don't melt at the "max" temperature of jet fuel either.
@JonnyOnly666 yea but this load melts in your moms mouth faggot. she shoulda swallowed you waste of life devil worshipping sperm burping aids baby bitch.
Not my fault ur a fuckin uneducated dick riding youtube troll with no life. Go read a book and not the magazines under ur moms stable.
@FnkDctr I'm slightly more educated then you, since you believe a government would attack its own buildings, thats more retarded than anyone could ever be, and since both your comebacks involved "your mom" put downs, that proves YOU are a retard, because you can't vary your points in an argument without resorting to using "your mom" as an escape goat... twice.
@JonnyOnly666 YOU ARE WRONG. HOW STUPID DOES IT MAKE U FEEL TO GET OWNED ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT? I CANT IMAGINE HOW PATHETIC YOUR ACTUAL LIFE IS
BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. GO WATCH THAT MOVIE. THEN PUT YOUR MOMS DICK BACK IN YOUR MOUTH AND SHUT THE FUCK UP. THANKS YOU UNEDUCATED PIECE OF SHIT. OWNED
@FnkDctr I'm not the one who got owned, the guy who can't create an insult with out (once again) using a "your mom" put down. You retarded, mesh brained, paedophilic, cloth eared, rancid excuse for human existence... see originality. I watch the news, so I don't need to watch word bending "truth" which you conspiracy theorists wank over. I don't sit at home trying to pick holes in everything, then exclaiming everything I find out like it's the fucking truth.
@JonnyOnly666 YOU ARE WRONG. HOW STUPID DOES IT MAKE U FEEL TO GET OWNED ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT? I CANT IMAGINE HOW PATHETIC YOUR ACTUAL LIFE IS
BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. GO WATCH THAT MOVIE. THEN PUT YOUR MOMS DICK BACK IN YOUR MOUTH AND SHUT THE FUCK UP. THANKS YOU UNEDUCATED PIECE OF SHIT. OWNED
@JonnyOnly666 YOU ARE WRONG. HOW STUPID DOES IT MAKE U FEEL TO GET OWNED ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT? I CANT IMAGINE HOW PATHETIC YOUR ACTUAL LIFE IS
BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. GO WATCH THAT MOVIE. THEN PUT YOUR MOMS DICK BACK IN YOUR MOUTH AND SHUT THE FUCK UP. THANKS YOU UNEDUCATED PIECE OF SHIT. OWNED
@JonnyOnly666 Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned!
@JonnyOnly666 You are the retarded one jonnyboy. Its the other way around. But jobs or not, the 9/11 boys bring up VERY valid points where the PM boys can neither confirm or rebuttle on. Dude, look at the facts. stop turning a nlind eye and SEE the evidence that has been presented instead of LISTENING to Heresay. I didnt want to believe the conspiracy, we have all been conned into believeing that a BOEING 757 which is 155' long, 44' high 124' wing span and over 100 tons created a hole 16' wide
@Deleonj76 I look at the evidence and realise what is scientific fact and what is just a coincidence which you nuts claim to be true. Do you know what murder does to a human? Most murderers end up going crazy and killing themselves, how could a government pull off total mass murder, blame it on someone else, and not crack? You want the 9/11 conspiracy to be true so bad, that you'll believe anything. It's a psychological effect that works on dumb people. Psychics use it as well to fool people.
@JonnyOnly666 I ran out of characters.... Planes are very flimsy, you can pierce them with pens, buildings are very solid, you need a lot of kinetic energy to pierce it, therefore due to newtons law "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" the force asserted on the building (which is very strong) will also be asserted on the plane (which is very weak) therefore the plane will loose, only the heavy parts of the plane (e.g. nosecone) will do real damage, the reset is disintegrated.
@JonnyOnly666 You people who believe the government's & main-stream media's countless lies are so very oblivious & closed-minded. You need to watch the 9-part series by David Ray Griffin called "Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical". He had accurately proved everything wrong that was in the Popular Mechanics report, the NIST report and all of those other "official" 9/11 reports.
@ocf1fan1 9/11 Official story is a complete BULLSHIT lie, going along with bullshit popular mechanics. These people who call conspiracy theorist "Nutjobs" are the most retarded and ignorant people you could ever run across too. They could NEVER explain why the WTC Lead Engineer said that the building could withstand a collision with a Boeing 707, which was the biggest plane at the time.
@liljuve13 If Popular Mechanics is complete bullshit then why are they able to debunk pretty much everything you conspiray theories bring up. As for what you said then. Tell me when has a massive plane like that ever crashed into a building like the twin towers.
@ocf1fan1 You Conspiracy Theories who keep trying to discredit those who disagree with you are nothing but haters. David Griffin did not proove anything wrong. You are sadly deluded if you believe that. You really think that a military jet hit the WTC, and a cruise missile hit The Pentigon?
@CrusaderJustice I'm not deluded whatsoever at all. The people who believe the lies that were in the NIST & Popular Mechanics 9/11 reports are the ones who are truly deluded. This very accurate video proves that the Popular Mechanics report on 9/11 was false: /watch?v=HfbjVvBuNGU Or you could watch the "September Clues" 9/11 documentary or the "9/11 Masterminds - Explosive Connections" video /watch?v=c3jnFtSElH4 for the truth about what really happened on 9/11.
@ocf1fan1 First of all it takes alot more than videos to give proof, Plus Ive seen alot of videos like that. many pecies of evidence given by Conspiracy sights like those and they dont proove anything. They are just using the smae conspiracy theoires as before and adding extra peices of evidence to them to try and make them more convincing. Also populer mechanic were not the only ones to debunk these theoires. Also you didnt answer my question.
@CrusaderJustice If you want me to answer questions of yours then don't insult me or call me "sadly deluded", which you already did. YouTube has character limit for each message, so that's why I can't give you the links to all of the videos that accurately show the truth about 9/11. I never said that Popular Mechanics were the only ones to have debunked those videos, so don't imply I had said that. I know for a fact that you haven't seen all of them, so here's another: /watch?v=0lU-vu2JvZY
@ocf1fan1 If it was insaulting to you. However I consider Conspiracy Theoires deluded because they gave given many theoires that dont add up to the evidence and turn the whole thing into some kind of movie. Also these videos do not show the truth, They just show other peoples opinions and peices of evidence they use to back them up. All this stuff about miliyary drones, controlled demoltion and cruise missile. It does not add up.
@CrusaderJustice Not all of those videos are false. The "September Clues" 9/11 documentary is by far the most accurate & credible one there is. Here's another accurate video about the truth of 9/11: /watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw
@ocf1fan1 What you showed me was an outdated video from 2007. It does give some evidence to back up its claim however it does not proof that exposions were in the towers. If there were explosives within the towers they would have collpsed from the bottom. But the towers collpsed from th top. Also you might want to know many stories changed after people calmed down and came to their senses. Also there are convincing answers to why those exposions were heard on Another website I looked long ago.
@CrusaderJustice I just looked that up on Google. The problem with those website articles is that they take the same stance as the Popular Mechanics report on 9/11, when the Popular Mechanics report on 9/11 has already been accurately proven as false. But I'll read one of the websites I found in that Google results soon, I gotta go to work in a few minutes.
@ocf1fan1 Well Popular Mechanics might have some holes but that doesnt mean it is faulse. If it were faulse then non of their theoires would add up at all. The one about The Pentigon is accurate. Also Popular Mecahnics has getherd their information from enginners and scintists and visctims of the famlies uknow.
Maybe in this call he didn't feel like dealing with you crazy conspiracy loons, I'm sure y'all call him hours on end, and he doesn't want to deal with your bullshit. He doesn't have time to answer and talk through every conspiracy phone call he gets. I don't blame him for deferring the phone call, unlike you I'm sure he has better things to do.
@ilikericeUSC MAYBE HE CANT BACK UP ANYTHING IN HIS BOOK SINCE HE DOESNT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT SAME AS HE GOT PUNKED IN THE LIVE INTERVIEW!!!
AHAHAHA GET OWNED DAVIN U FUCKIN SHIT FAGGOT. BALD PEDO PIECE OF SHIT! I HOPE YOUR SONS BURN IN A FIRE AND YOUR HOUSE COLLAPSES ON THEM! HAHAHAHA THAT U FUCKIN MIS INFORMANT PIECE OF SHIT
@theycallmejpj sooooo, you're submitting that amongst all of the fire and explosions going on in and around 7WTC, there were people attaching cords to the top of the building to literally "pull" it down? I'm not trying to be rude, I'm neither for nor against the truthers, but to suggest that this is what L. Silverstein meant when he said "pull it" is logically unsound. This video and phone call seemed to be staged though, it doesn't seem natural. ONE LOVE
@bbrandonorbust pull meaning pull into the ground. They do use cables to pull buildings down and I think they did pull down some unstable walls using cables that day, but with buildiung 7 it was definately pull with demolition charges.
@marcusdolby1 And.... the person calling has no life or job? Because he is clearly representing those that no longer have a life and a job. When you know what the term "pull-it" means. Its really not hard to find. marcus the dumbass trying to talk down someone who is actually asking a valid question about a valid issue for people who no longer have lives and jobs!!
@supercheeseyboy- It's called common sense. Common English used in sentences to describe something. Larry said it right. (Pull it) What he should have said was (Pull'em), Cause they pulled them all.
They had to keep using the Pentagon. And was it coincidence that it was hit where construction was underway. Marvelous. They really thought this one out guys. The fooled ones are scared their leaders will fall. And they have to justify all this killing being done.
You can hear in his voice (unless your wool is covering your ears) that he is hiding something, and is lying threw his teeth. If they are so sure of their bullshit explanations he would have jumped at the chance to prove it. Not refuse to even answer one question. Media is controlled by the government.
Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Family who Theodore Roosevelt once said, "He is the most potent single influence for evil we have in our life." His heirs have openly admitted their allegiance to his views. In addition, American Free Press revealed that Benjamin Chertoff, the 25-year-old senior researcher who authored the Popular Mechanics 9/11 article, is related to Michael Chertoff, the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Pull it means to "pull the building down with cables" in the demolitions building industry.
I think Davin handled the idiot well. Seriously, what moron calls a persons personal phone number to make an enquiry about the book? He was doing what he was told to do by his lawyers - forward the call onto the right contact number.
come on fellars, dont take the piss outta dirty lil dumb arse, debumker n despicable n disapointing, decieving n disgusting, slimey piece of corporate shit davin coburn
What are the odds that only Silverstein's bldgs would fall? Why not 5 or 6? They were infernos hit with huge pieces of debris? What are the odds that 3 steel frame bldgs collapse on the same day in the incident? Add the odds that Silverstein would use the term (pull it) out of context? "We decided the smartest thing to do was pull "it" ( not "them" )..they made that decision to pull and we watched the bldg collapse". It simply makes no sense unless he was saying they decided to bring it down.
@amzuel420 Then you got reports of people saying the building would be coming down...which would concur with what Silverstein said. When I watched the Popular Mechanics debate I noticed they started off calling people conspiracy nuts. How the hell smart you gotta be to figure this out when you add the hundreds of "odds beaters" to it. For Christ's sake they're trying to tell us that bomb proof buildings fall down because of fire and some debris? What made 5 and 6 such good buildings?
@KayBeeEee1983 I'd say the odds that truthers have a fully functioning brain are a lot better than the odd you do if you can make a call like that without the slightest bit of research. A smart mouth don't prove anything except maybe that you lack some social skills. Try some research.
@amzuel420 You obviously didn't do any research, or you would know that Silverstein owned every WTC building. Yet another "truth"er who claims to be basing his ideas on facts when he's just pulling shit out of his ass.
You also claim that the Popular Mechanics guys started off their Loose Change debate by calling people conspiracy nuts, which is totally false. Yet another "truth"er who is a bold-faced liar. In fact, Bermas started off by calling Popular Mechanics "yellow journalism". Class Act.
@KayBeeEee1983 I don't believe I ever said that those were the "only buildings that Silverstein owned". I said that the only buildings that ever fell because of a fire, were owned by Silverstein. You sound like a very skilled researcher. Unfortunately I don't care much for "researchers" that try to add meanings to my words .......have a nice day.
@amzuel420 'I don't believe I ever said that those were the "only buildings that Silverstein owned". I said that the only buildings that ever fell because of a fire, were owned by Silverstein.'
Now you're misquoting me, and yourself, too, actually. I never claimed that you said that. Here is what you said originally: "What are the odds that only Silverstein's bldgs would fall? Why not 5 or 6?"
To me, that conveys the belief that WTC 5 & 6 were not owned by Silverstein. Did I misinterpret?
@amzuel420 "I said that the only buildings that ever fell because of a fire, were owned by Silverstein."
Why do "truth"ers keep bringing up the "fact" that no building has ever collapsed because of a fire, like it's relevant? Do they have to constantly be reminded that a 120-ton commercial jet slammed into each building?
@KayBeeEee1983 You don't think that's relevant? And you claim to have done some actual research? And in case you didn't catch the news...no plane hit building 7...What's your excuse for that one? I say "excuse" because it pretty obvious that you're either trying to protect the government from something.or your trying to protect yourself from having to admit your government has screwed you...which is it?
No, it's not relevant because none of the buildings that collapsed were damaged ONLY by fire. 2 planes hit WTC 1 & 2, and a large portion of WTC 1 landed on WTC 7 and damaged it.
I believe our government screwed us, but not deliberately. They were incompetent. How the hell could they allow knives on airplanes? How could Bush sit in that classroom knowing that 2 planes had just crashed into the WTC? Bush was the worst 2 term president in history.
@amzuel420 If WTC 1, 2 & 7 were demolished, why did they wait so long to demolish them? The gov't must have known that people would be able to hear all those explosions, why would they let those witnesses live? It makes much more sense to demolish them immediately upon the plane's impact so that they could eliminate all potential witnesses of the detonations.
Why would they wait until the firefighters left WTC 7 to demolish it, when they didn't give a shit about all the ones inside WTC 1&2?
@KayBeeEee1983 They didn't wait very long and people DID hear explosions. Good grief have you looked into this at all? Hundreds of people including fire fighters and police reported explosions. Have you ever heard of Barry Jennings? He was the Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department, (NY City Housing Authority)? And he was dead a short time after he gave this interview (watch?v=_DuSeuxjiJQ) . Many others that were witnesses are also dead.
@amzuel420 Please start reading my comments more than once before you reply. I said
"The gov't must have known that people would be able to hear all those explosions, why would they let those witnesses live? It makes much more sense to demolish them immediately upon the plane's impact so that they could eliminate all potential witnesses of the detonations."
I'm asking why the conspirators would allow people into and out of the buildings, creating hundreds of witnesses to the planted explosions.
@amzuel420 Good grief, have YOU looked into this at all? WTC 2 stood for 56 minutes, WTC 1 for 102 minutes, and WTC 7 for about 7 hours after WTC 1 fell on it. You don't think those are large periods of time?
There were hundreds, maybe thousands, of witnesses, and it's 10 years later. Of course some are going to die. Why would they kill Barry Jennings because of that interview? He doesn't add any new incriminating information. He just says what 100 other people have said: they heard explosions
@amzuel420 Case-in-point: you just brought up the death of Barry Jennings. Yes, he supposedly heard explosions in WTC 7. Yes, he died after giving an interview about it. Yes, many other witnesses have also died. So what? None of that is PROOF of anything. So how can you demand proof from me? HYPOCRISY. It's laughable. You "truth"ers are nothing but living jokes.
@KayBeeEee1983 You see what you're doing? I answer every single question or doubt and you still wanna try and pull my chain. Then you try to insult me and call me stupid because I want some questions answer. I've tried to be benevolent and I've tried to show you some respect but you wanna know the truth? You make me sick. All you can do is try and cut down others to elevate yourself. Have a nice day. You're not worth talking to. And YOU are the joke...you just don't know it.
@KayBeeEee1983 You're asking me questions I don't have an answer for. I don't know why they didn't demolish them on impact. If you look into it you find lots and lots of highly trained independent researchers and engineers saying it was demo. So if you're saying that I have to know "why" they did it to proves it was a demo...you're way off. That doesn't prove anything. Physical evidence proves things. You don't have to prove "why" a person killed someone to prove they killed someone.
@amzuel420 Those questions were rhetorical. I asked them to prove that they weren't deliberately demolished. Since you can't answer them, it proves my point. There's no logical reason why they would wait 7 hours to take down WTC 7.
You might have a point if there actually was hard evidence that they were demolished. But there isn't. The vast majority of "truth"ers simply point to inconsistencies in the "official" story to show that something's up.
@amzuel420 Your murder analogy is terrible. NO ONE, not even "truth"ers, think the government caused 9/11 just for the hell of it. They ALL say it was for some reason, usually oil and attacking the middle east. A better analogy would be: why would a murderer allow a person to witness a murder, and then just let that person live so they can tell the world what they saw you do? They wouldn't. They would do anything they could to minimize the risk of being caught.
@amzuel420 "Truth"ers are just like religious nuts. They need absolutely no real evidence whatsoever to believe what they believe, all they need or have is circumstantial evidence, but if someone tries to challenge their beliefs, they DEMAND solid proof. It's absolutely ridiculous. I'm starting to think that the entire "truth" movement is just one giant, disorganized conspiracy put forward by sociopaths who just want to piss off normal people because it amuses them.
@amzuel420 "Truth"ers spend their entire worthless lives trying to come up with questions that the so-called "lie defenders" can't answer. I have questions that "truth"ers can't answer. But my questions are rational, unlike the bullshit "truth"ers spew, like "why did WTC 7 collapse?" and "Why is there no video of a plane hitting the pentagon?" and "why did WTC 1 fall so perfectly straight and at freefall speed?" and "why did people hear secondary explosions?" and "why does my life suck so hard?"
you people are dumb for falling for this, you really think Davin Cobourn, one of the big wigs at popular mechanics is gonna take a call from some random guy about 9/11? like really i'm sure theres hundreds if not thousands of people who tried to get a hold of him, ya think he's gonna talk to each and every one of them? it's obvious that's not David Colbourn on the phone you gullable bastards. You people seriously piss me off it's just another bullshit theory just like JFK or pearl harbour!
@Oz1976 hey oz... if you think that the 9/11 truth movement is so silly, then why are you even taking the time to fight against it? does it really need to be fought against? are you threatened by the truth movement? and why are you watching all of these videos if you don't have doubts about what really happened?
1) putting in 9/11 in the search brings up all this bullshit
2) I choose to "fight against" the "truth" movement in the memory of the 3 friends I lost that day who these shitstains disparage their memories with convoluted conspiracy theories with no science to back them up.
3) I have zero doubts about what happened that day.
@Oz1976 Well im terribly sorry about the loss of your friends. but im surprised that the frustration of what you went through doesn't give you motivation to explore the possibility that maybe this wasn't just caused by al qaeda. im sorry but i think you may just want to deny it because it would just be too painful to bare that your friends could've been murdered by our own gov't. and you're wrong there is science to back it up. and it's completely natural to question the world we live in
@skeeterdude04 Who says it didn't? Unfortunately, after the initial seduction of the conspiracy theory wears off and you put it up against the science and evidence. The "inside job" conspiracy theory falls apart. There is no science backing up the conspiracy theory my friend. The "science" you speak off is not peer reviewed. The Journal for 9/11 Studies is a sham. They only "publish" science that fits their agenda. Hell the head and editor is Steven Jones. Not one CT Whitepaper has been..cont
@skeeterdude04 published in a respected peer reviewed scientific journal.
Respected Chemistry Journals: Accounts of Chemical Research, Angewandte Chemie, Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Chemical Communications, Chemical Reviews, Chemistry Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Helvetica Chimica Acta
Respected Physics Journals: Advances in Physics, American Journal of Physics,
Popular Mechanics could not have chosen a more stupid person to fact check than Davin Coburn. He alone makes a huge mockery of the Official Story and any clown who believes the Official Story. Thank You Davin Coburn from all in the 9/11 truth movement, you're a tremendous help to our cause son!
he isnt owning the popular mechanics guy.the popular mechanics guy is being smart.why try to explain somthing to someone who already has it in their head that our goverment did it.not to mention every time a truther gets proven wrong they want to deny facts.
Facts like Bush Senior did not meet with Bin Laden's Brother on 9/11, that the Carlyle Group did not host a conference at a Washington hotel. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama.
@Xendrius it took me 10 second to realize that loose change was paranoid conspiracy theory, but im still studying the mechanism of these theories. Memes are intresting.
@tgrfan42069 -Sorry bra, but the gov has lied to us before, what in gods name makes you believe that they wouldn't do it again?!?!? Over 56 THOUSAND U.S. troops died in Vietnam over a LIE to get us into the war with them (I.e. gulf of Ton-kin) Throw another 70 thousand on top of that who where scarred for life from shell-shock over the war they fought only to come home and have pieces of shit like yourself spit on them for doing what the government made them do. Over a lie
@Nazzafied uh my dad fought in nam so to say i spat on people coming home from nam is just pathetic.fucking hippie i bet you are the one who spat on them.
@tgrfan42069 My father fought in Nam as well. How could I be a hippie if I hate them as well. Ask your father why he went to Nam and he himself will prolly tell you like mine did, "Over a lie". I WILL, however, spit on any1 that tries to tell me 911 ISNT a cover-up, then proceed to kick the living shit outta them for trying to get me to conform. Dont let these idiot nay-sayers get you to believe what your own eyes, ears and mind tell you is the truth... God bless ur pops by the way.
@LifeRegenRevolution just watched it. im familiar with this theory but never saw this particular vid. thanks for the laughs.
"Human Nature is easily fooled and Most people base their views on subjective Emotion and whats Popular" try to wrap your brain around this... 9/11 truth is very popular. if youll notice on most vid threads on the topic the truthers vastly outnumber the debunkers like an infestation. who are the freethinkers again?
actually you stand corrected, 911 Truth is a very tiny segment of videos on here compared to the Tribute videos and those promoting and defending the official story. Fact is Most Americans have NO interest in 911 either way and have long forgotten about and have no more interest in it regardless of what anyone says.
its only a correction if its true nice attempt however. OBVIOUSLY the tribute videos outnumber everything but once again truther vids vs. debunker vids... truther vids win by a vast majority and that is simple fact.
im very impressed with your copy and paste abilities which everyone knows is a truthers best friend, especially since you consider poorly made videos, montages with scary music and out of context sound bytes as hard evidence... you are victim of the 911 lies movement sir
If we take the # of Americans that are interested in 911, which is a very small minority to begin with as most have no interest in any of this whatsoever and are mezmerized by Tiger woods sex life and want to know every minute detail of it, and other such asinine nonsense
out of that # , Most obviously fully believe the Official Story. I can easily correct you all day Long every day. You sound quite naive, clueless and ignorant
wait what does tiger have to do with any of this? haha i sound ignorant because i dont believe your rhetoric? no wonder i knew your word wasnt worth anything from the get go. you are not correcting me you are just repeating your own false presumptions. fact is their is nothing you can copy and paste to me that hasnt been copy and pasted to me by a hundred other brainwashed kookspiracy theorists so you may as well quit trying. the truthers are desperate and you are prime example
hhaha also i just did an experiment and plainly typed "9/11" and the first 3 vids are tributes... from then on with a couple exceptions are truther vids haha real valiant effort but eventual fail as all truthers do. i guess you like most people choose to believe whats popular. most people are wrong about most things most of the time...you
wowh, you really are quite desperate arent you. Here you are actually trying to say that MOST people in the world believe 911 was an inside Job ? This is so strange, because you guys always say those that believe it was a scam are a small minority of fools and whackos.
i dont speak for all people who believe the official story, i speak for myself. give me 15 seconds and ill find 2 mouthbreathing truthers that contradict each other, what does that prove? i must conclude that the majority of people within the youtube community are undoubtedly truthers. YT is the truthers creed after all. dont take my word for it, type in "9/11" and see for yourself.
and dont worry im not angry im actually still trying to figure out im discouraged by your density or just amused
We have guys on here on your side saying that Only 100 to 150 people saw the Planes in nyc on 911, Others say oh No they are dead wrong, it was MILLIONS of people who saw the Planes
ok, we have a massive and huge contradiction here, so who is Right and why cant you guys agree on how many people saw planes ????
@LifeRegenRevolution like i said give me 15 seconds and i can find 2 twoofers on your side that contradict each other... what does that prove? nothing
truther a: the building fell too perfectly in its own footprint ith little debris it must have been a cont. demo.
truther b: there were massive amounts of debris and steel seen shooting out of the towers even lodged into neighboring buildings indicating explosives.
does that contradiction mean all truthers are wrong? i mean, they are but not for that reason.
also why exactly would i want to base my opinion on some crosseyed mouth breathers smart ass prank calls? keep in mind im not 15 anymore
so the most Multi faceted intricate complex Event in American history was all due to Nothing more than 19 Crazy Arab video game nerds waving rusty box cutters ?
@rigatony019 When a building collapses there isn't any energy strong enough within the building to eject any type of steel frames outward. Only way that could have happened is if there had been some sort of energy within the building . otherwise reffered to explosives.
@TheRevealingTruth there most certainly could be enough pressure built up inside to eject debris. Windows floors below often blow out during collapses in buildings smaller than this so its not that hard to believe. It is hard to believe that a building could be demolished with silent explosive however.
@rigatony019 You are wrong, the debris wouldn't be pushed out of the windows from 80 floors below where the impact was.There is video footage of this. If it fell in a "pancake motion", the debris would be pushed out of every window around the building right under each floor that is collapsing,NOT 80 floors BELOW where it starts to fall, and from ONE designated spot to the other. That theory is bullshit,most people haven't heard of the pools of molten metal at the bottom that contained THERMITE!
@rigatony019 My bad, it DID fall in a pancake motion, what i meant was that the results of the debris pushing out the windows was not due to the collapse, but i am sure you figured that out =p
@rigatony019 Also keep in mind the wtc collapsed in a " Pancake Fashion". So therefor the mass from the bottom of the building should have been strong enough to withstand the top of the building from collapsing. So it would loose speed as it fell never would it gain speed. Both wtc fell near free fall speed. thats incredible.
Many clouds you see are not natural but created from "chemtrails". It's a secret worlwide spraying program! Check out my channel for eye-witness video, search YouTube for "Don't Talk About the Weather" and "Aerosol Crimes".
Don't let the paid agents all over YouTube waste your time with stupid arguments. The most important thing you can do is learn more and wake others ASAP. Good luck!
Lmao
MrDalesplace 4 months ago
This is one of those videos where the poster ends up looking like a complete jerk-off, but doesn't have the common sense to remove the video.
VoicesDisturbed 4 months ago
were is the pwnage?
ray4ix 6 months ago
Watch Loose change vs Popular mechanics. The difference, is that this time the people from Popular Mechanics are prepared and make Avery and his friend look like immature children. They're points are so easily debunked it's funny.
TheSpartanondrugs 7 months ago
Nobody was "owned." That was a very standard and professional response. Coburn has a job. He just can't debate every nut that calls in.
nateium 8 months ago 13
@nateium Truthers don't understand employment, that's why the think they pwned this dude.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
@nateium Debate? you need to watch that again and try listening this time. FIRST, thing he says, is in reference to providing the source of the information used to compile the report on the DNA of the 19 highjackers. That assclown couldnt even do that, so why not ask him directly since he wont allow you to go look at ALL of the raw data/info/research that was utilized to reach their proposed conclusion.
xinecallaw 5 months ago
@xinecallaw He isn't going to talk to every clown that calls him. This isn't ownage, he just didn't want to deal with another nutbag that's calls him when he has other things to do. He responded professionally and gave him the number of his media representative. It's just not appropriate to call people who don't know you and expect them to enter a debate and answer your questions.
jshnaidz245 4 months ago
That's not even Davin Coburn.
MrMZaccone 8 months ago
Why would you expect him to answer any questions at work? He has an actual JOB to do. I know that's a foreign concept to "truth"ers.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned!
FnkDctr 8 months ago
Davin was not owned. He knows from experience that it is a complete waste of time to argue with a "9/11 truther." And he's at work, doing his job. It's not his job to talk to every single truther out there. That's why he wrote the book debunking all the 9/11 myths.
jrvenice1999 8 months ago
Mechanics are not meant te be Popular, they only are meant to be Real.
"...reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled", Richard Feynman (Nobel Prize winner in physics).
TaoPiet 8 months ago
WTF? He didnt get owned, he just didnt want to talk to a nut job. Haha
safarigoo 9 months ago
well i've changed my mind, i've just tried to watched a bunch videos and all of us truthers are douchebags, we are wrong. there is probably some sort of conspiracy to all this but we're way off.
ibeleaf 9 months ago
How did they match the DNA of the hijackers? Bush is a liar, and Obama is in the loop or a coward......9/11 = Inside job
Born2Flesh 9 months ago
@Born2Flesh 9/11 was an outside job
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Born2Flesh Hair from their hotel rooms and tiny traces of skin in their rental cars.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@jonnyonly666
I have watched it...its great, because thats not true at all, the guys from popular mechanics keep going off topic and dont expalin all their "evidence". They just continue to describe and scrutinize any conspiracy theorists when they are about to be proven wrong hahaha lol
emerican122189 9 months ago
@emerican122189 Good job seeing and hearing what you want, like always. Not sure if you noticed, but you're truther posterboy scum friends acted like complete children and giggled every time someone from the magazine was speaking. You're friend Jason was pathetic, and couldn't control himself at all, which is very typical of someone who is losing an argument and can't give a relevant response.The PM people were mature and spoke clearly and calmly, and rebutted each point thrown at them.
bostonsports13243546 9 months ago
@jonnyonly666
I have watched it...its great, because thats not true at all, the guys from popular mechanics keep going off topic and dont expalin all their "evidence". They just continue to describe and scrutinize any conspiracy theorists when they are about to be proven wrong hahaha lol
emerican122189 9 months ago
Your all really really retarded. Watch the Popular Mechanics vs Loose Change interview. The 9/11 conspiracy nut jobs get owned on every point...
JonnyOnly666 10 months ago 6
@JonnyOnly666 popular mechanics was paid to cover the truth and add more confusion.
Only a 666 asshole would talk such rubish. Go burn in hell with Bush and Cheney you scum
FnkDctr 9 months ago
@FnkDctr cos that makes sense, did you know, i was actually just paid to write that comment (and this one) to try and make you think the government did it by using reverse psychology.... and i don't melt at the "max" temperature of jet fuel either.
JonnyOnly666 9 months ago
@JonnyOnly666 yea but this load melts in your moms mouth faggot. she shoulda swallowed you waste of life devil worshipping sperm burping aids baby bitch.
Not my fault ur a fuckin uneducated dick riding youtube troll with no life. Go read a book and not the magazines under ur moms stable.
FnkDctr 9 months ago
@FnkDctr I'm slightly more educated then you, since you believe a government would attack its own buildings, thats more retarded than anyone could ever be, and since both your comebacks involved "your mom" put downs, that proves YOU are a retard, because you can't vary your points in an argument without resorting to using "your mom" as an escape goat... twice.
JonnyOnly666 9 months ago
@JonnyOnly666 YOU ARE WRONG. HOW STUPID DOES IT MAKE U FEEL TO GET OWNED ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT? I CANT IMAGINE HOW PATHETIC YOUR ACTUAL LIFE IS
BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. GO WATCH THAT MOVIE. THEN PUT YOUR MOMS DICK BACK IN YOUR MOUTH AND SHUT THE FUCK UP. THANKS YOU UNEDUCATED PIECE OF SHIT. OWNED
FnkDctr 9 months ago
@FnkDctr I'm not the one who got owned, the guy who can't create an insult with out (once again) using a "your mom" put down. You retarded, mesh brained, paedophilic, cloth eared, rancid excuse for human existence... see originality. I watch the news, so I don't need to watch word bending "truth" which you conspiracy theorists wank over. I don't sit at home trying to pick holes in everything, then exclaiming everything I find out like it's the fucking truth.
JonnyOnly666 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JonnyOnly666 YOU ARE WRONG. HOW STUPID DOES IT MAKE U FEEL TO GET OWNED ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT? I CANT IMAGINE HOW PATHETIC YOUR ACTUAL LIFE IS
BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. GO WATCH THAT MOVIE. THEN PUT YOUR MOMS DICK BACK IN YOUR MOUTH AND SHUT THE FUCK UP. THANKS YOU UNEDUCATED PIECE OF SHIT. OWNED
FnkDctr 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JonnyOnly666 YOU ARE WRONG. HOW STUPID DOES IT MAKE U FEEL TO GET OWNED ON A YOUTUBE VIDEO YOU DUMB PIECE OF SHIT? I CANT IMAGINE HOW PATHETIC YOUR ACTUAL LIFE IS
BLUEPRINT FOR TRUTH. GO WATCH THAT MOVIE. THEN PUT YOUR MOMS DICK BACK IN YOUR MOUTH AND SHUT THE FUCK UP. THANKS YOU UNEDUCATED PIECE OF SHIT. OWNED
FnkDctr 8 months ago
@JonnyOnly666 Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned! Davin from Popular Mechanics owned!
FnkDctr 8 months ago
@JonnyOnly666 You are the retarded one jonnyboy. Its the other way around. But jobs or not, the 9/11 boys bring up VERY valid points where the PM boys can neither confirm or rebuttle on. Dude, look at the facts. stop turning a nlind eye and SEE the evidence that has been presented instead of LISTENING to Heresay. I didnt want to believe the conspiracy, we have all been conned into believeing that a BOEING 757 which is 155' long, 44' high 124' wing span and over 100 tons created a hole 16' wide
Deleonj76 4 months ago
@Deleonj76 I look at the evidence and realise what is scientific fact and what is just a coincidence which you nuts claim to be true. Do you know what murder does to a human? Most murderers end up going crazy and killing themselves, how could a government pull off total mass murder, blame it on someone else, and not crack? You want the 9/11 conspiracy to be true so bad, that you'll believe anything. It's a psychological effect that works on dumb people. Psychics use it as well to fool people.
JonnyOnly666 4 months ago
@JonnyOnly666 I ran out of characters.... Planes are very flimsy, you can pierce them with pens, buildings are very solid, you need a lot of kinetic energy to pierce it, therefore due to newtons law "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" the force asserted on the building (which is very strong) will also be asserted on the plane (which is very weak) therefore the plane will loose, only the heavy parts of the plane (e.g. nosecone) will do real damage, the reset is disintegrated.
JonnyOnly666 4 months ago
@JonnyOnly666 You people who believe the government's & main-stream media's countless lies are so very oblivious & closed-minded. You need to watch the 9-part series by David Ray Griffin called "Debunking 9/11 Debunking - Let's Get Empirical". He had accurately proved everything wrong that was in the Popular Mechanics report, the NIST report and all of those other "official" 9/11 reports.
ocf1fan1 4 months ago
@ocf1fan1 9/11 Official story is a complete BULLSHIT lie, going along with bullshit popular mechanics. These people who call conspiracy theorist "Nutjobs" are the most retarded and ignorant people you could ever run across too. They could NEVER explain why the WTC Lead Engineer said that the building could withstand a collision with a Boeing 707, which was the biggest plane at the time.
liljuve13 3 weeks ago
@liljuve13 If Popular Mechanics is complete bullshit then why are they able to debunk pretty much everything you conspiray theories bring up. As for what you said then. Tell me when has a massive plane like that ever crashed into a building like the twin towers.
CrusaderJustice 1 week ago
@ocf1fan1 You Conspiracy Theories who keep trying to discredit those who disagree with you are nothing but haters. David Griffin did not proove anything wrong. You are sadly deluded if you believe that. You really think that a military jet hit the WTC, and a cruise missile hit The Pentigon?
CrusaderJustice 1 week ago
@CrusaderJustice I'm not deluded whatsoever at all. The people who believe the lies that were in the NIST & Popular Mechanics 9/11 reports are the ones who are truly deluded. This very accurate video proves that the Popular Mechanics report on 9/11 was false: /watch?v=HfbjVvBuNGU Or you could watch the "September Clues" 9/11 documentary or the "9/11 Masterminds - Explosive Connections" video /watch?v=c3jnFtSElH4 for the truth about what really happened on 9/11.
ocf1fan1 1 week ago
@ocf1fan1 First of all it takes alot more than videos to give proof, Plus Ive seen alot of videos like that. many pecies of evidence given by Conspiracy sights like those and they dont proove anything. They are just using the smae conspiracy theoires as before and adding extra peices of evidence to them to try and make them more convincing. Also populer mechanic were not the only ones to debunk these theoires. Also you didnt answer my question.
CrusaderJustice 1 week ago
@CrusaderJustice If you want me to answer questions of yours then don't insult me or call me "sadly deluded", which you already did. YouTube has character limit for each message, so that's why I can't give you the links to all of the videos that accurately show the truth about 9/11. I never said that Popular Mechanics were the only ones to have debunked those videos, so don't imply I had said that. I know for a fact that you haven't seen all of them, so here's another: /watch?v=0lU-vu2JvZY
ocf1fan1 1 week ago
@ocf1fan1 If it was insaulting to you. However I consider Conspiracy Theoires deluded because they gave given many theoires that dont add up to the evidence and turn the whole thing into some kind of movie. Also these videos do not show the truth, They just show other peoples opinions and peices of evidence they use to back them up. All this stuff about miliyary drones, controlled demoltion and cruise missile. It does not add up.
CrusaderJustice 1 week ago
@CrusaderJustice Not all of those videos are false. The "September Clues" 9/11 documentary is by far the most accurate & credible one there is. Here's another accurate video about the truth of 9/11: /watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw
ocf1fan1 1 week ago
@ocf1fan1 What you showed me was an outdated video from 2007. It does give some evidence to back up its claim however it does not proof that exposions were in the towers. If there were explosives within the towers they would have collpsed from the bottom. But the towers collpsed from th top. Also you might want to know many stories changed after people calmed down and came to their senses. Also there are convincing answers to why those exposions were heard on Another website I looked long ago.
CrusaderJustice 1 week ago
@CrusaderJustice Then what are the convincing answers about why those explosions were heard, that you found out from another website on?
ocf1fan1 1 week ago
@ocf1fan1 Google Debunking 9/11. It contains alot more information then populer mechanics. Also there are some videos that explain it aswell.
CrusaderJustice 1 week ago
@CrusaderJustice I just looked that up on Google. The problem with those website articles is that they take the same stance as the Popular Mechanics report on 9/11, when the Popular Mechanics report on 9/11 has already been accurately proven as false. But I'll read one of the websites I found in that Google results soon, I gotta go to work in a few minutes.
ocf1fan1 1 week ago
@ocf1fan1 Well Popular Mechanics might have some holes but that doesnt mean it is faulse. If it were faulse then non of their theoires would add up at all. The one about The Pentigon is accurate. Also Popular Mecahnics has getherd their information from enginners and scintists and visctims of the famlies uknow.
CrusaderJustice 1 week ago
Maybe in this call he didn't feel like dealing with you crazy conspiracy loons, I'm sure y'all call him hours on end, and he doesn't want to deal with your bullshit. He doesn't have time to answer and talk through every conspiracy phone call he gets. I don't blame him for deferring the phone call, unlike you I'm sure he has better things to do.
ilikericeUSC 10 months ago 2
@ilikericeUSC MAYBE HE CANT BACK UP ANYTHING IN HIS BOOK SINCE HE DOESNT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT SAME AS HE GOT PUNKED IN THE LIVE INTERVIEW!!!
AHAHAHA GET OWNED DAVIN U FUCKIN SHIT FAGGOT. BALD PEDO PIECE OF SHIT! I HOPE YOUR SONS BURN IN A FIRE AND YOUR HOUSE COLLAPSES ON THEM! HAHAHAHA THAT U FUCKIN MIS INFORMANT PIECE OF SHIT
FnkDctr 8 months ago
@ilikericeUSC Hey slave, why are you talking? shouldnt you be licking the feet of your masters? People like you deserve to live on your knees. Idiot.
Seigu007 8 months ago
@theycallmejpj sooooo, you're submitting that amongst all of the fire and explosions going on in and around 7WTC, there were people attaching cords to the top of the building to literally "pull" it down? I'm not trying to be rude, I'm neither for nor against the truthers, but to suggest that this is what L. Silverstein meant when he said "pull it" is logically unsound. This video and phone call seemed to be staged though, it doesn't seem natural. ONE LOVE
bbrandonorbust 11 months ago
@bbrandonorbust pull meaning pull into the ground. They do use cables to pull buildings down and I think they did pull down some unstable walls using cables that day, but with buildiung 7 it was definately pull with demolition charges.
RavenPrecept 11 months ago
Pull it IS NOT a demo term DUMB ASS.
Could you please give a source for the 3 demo contractors you called?
911 TRUTH = STRAWMAN
ctcole77 1 year ago
@ctcole77 Oh no. Not u again. lol. I think if u look u will find that this is a common term in controlled demolition.
KS8730 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KS8730
Actually "theycallmejpj" is dead on.
"pull it" is when a building is literally pulled down via cables going over the roof and has nothing to do with explosives
I think if you stop being a gullible moron you might just learn that -
911 WAS AN OUTSIDE JOB!
ctcole77 11 months ago
"pull it" is when a building is literally pulled down via cables going over the roof and has nothing to do with explosives
theycallmejpj 1 year ago
The only thing this proves is that Davin has a job and a life, and this guy who called is a worthless spectulating troll.
Any questions?
marcusdolby1 1 year ago
@marcusdolby1 And.... the person calling has no life or job? Because he is clearly representing those that no longer have a life and a job. When you know what the term "pull-it" means. Its really not hard to find. marcus the dumbass trying to talk down someone who is actually asking a valid question about a valid issue for people who no longer have lives and jobs!!
blaknoizee 1 year ago
HOLY FUCK, THIS PROVES THAT POPULAR MECHANICS WAS PAYED OFF BY THE GOVERNMENT!!!
Bigdadda20 1 year ago
@Bigdadda20 LOL...good one!
you forgot to close your tag [/sarcasim]
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides I forgot to close my tag?? What does that mean?
Bigdadda20 1 year ago
@Bigdadda20 look up how to post pitures in forums, there's a good explination there.
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
@BadBunnyRides What are you talking about??
Bigdadda20 1 year ago
@Bigdadda20 Oh for petes sake, look it up yourself. Im not here to spoon feed you, you have google, the internet, its all right there ok?
BadBunnyRides 1 year ago
I don't think that word means what you think that it means...He was avoiding insane people. Where's your source for the demolition term?
supercheeseyboy 1 year ago
@supercheeseyboy- It's called common sense. Common English used in sentences to describe something. Larry said it right. (Pull it) What he should have said was (Pull'em), Cause they pulled them all.
They had to keep using the Pentagon. And was it coincidence that it was hit where construction was underway. Marvelous. They really thought this one out guys. The fooled ones are scared their leaders will fall. And they have to justify all this killing being done.
It's a fucking shame.
Snowman374th 1 year ago
You can hear in his voice (unless your wool is covering your ears) that he is hiding something, and is lying threw his teeth. If they are so sure of their bullshit explanations he would have jumped at the chance to prove it. Not refuse to even answer one question. Media is controlled by the government.
AlienVisitor 1 year ago
Popular Mechanics is owned by the Hearst Family who Theodore Roosevelt once said, "He is the most potent single influence for evil we have in our life." His heirs have openly admitted their allegiance to his views. In addition, American Free Press revealed that Benjamin Chertoff, the 25-year-old senior researcher who authored the Popular Mechanics 9/11 article, is related to Michael Chertoff, the former Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
autumncathedral 1 year ago
@autumncathedral Wow I didn't know that, that alone is very suspicious. Thanks for the info.
AlienVisitor 1 year ago
I want copyright on this word:
Debumpkins. Use it widely, wisely and well.
OneVoiceMore 1 year ago
One of the best quotes from one of the greatest shows. " 1/4th of americans are idiots"
Guinea54 1 year ago 2
Pull it means to "pull the building down with cables" in the demolitions building industry.
I think Davin handled the idiot well. Seriously, what moron calls a persons personal phone number to make an enquiry about the book? He was doing what he was told to do by his lawyers - forward the call onto the right contact number.
Clarrisani 1 year ago
212-649-2935 is an invalid number now!
anewlow23 1 year ago
stupid typical hoboes like david and all people who think terrorists did that the only terrorists who did that was the gov. and the gov. fuknig hoes
iloveafg123 1 year ago
He's trembling and can't even answer it himself... What a fucking joke this Davin guy is.
Germanboy567 1 year ago
this guy does not know how to bloody answer questions
UrMumIsSoBadAss90 1 year ago
He got owned by loose change now he gets owned again...Hahahaa fail
liljuve13 1 year ago 2
come on fellars, dont take the piss outta dirty lil dumb arse, debumker n despicable n disapointing, decieving n disgusting, slimey piece of corporate shit davin coburn
wild0hawk 1 year ago
sounds like a nice guy :] hahaha xD
OBLIVIONMASTER94 1 year ago
caught with his pants down
heartandsoul1988 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You people are idiots.
ArtypNk 1 year ago
OWNED, YET AGAIN
bushkilledtowers 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
9/11 was an inside job...
mosharr93 1 year ago
This is good, he just runs away from the questions
Mrquestionreality 1 year ago
@Mrquestionreality
Maybe because he deals with assholes like you all the time.
EngineerAdams 1 year ago
@EngineerAdams sorry for having questions and not blindly following the truth
Mrquestionreality 1 year ago
What are the odds that only Silverstein's bldgs would fall? Why not 5 or 6? They were infernos hit with huge pieces of debris? What are the odds that 3 steel frame bldgs collapse on the same day in the incident? Add the odds that Silverstein would use the term (pull it) out of context? "We decided the smartest thing to do was pull "it" ( not "them" )..they made that decision to pull and we watched the bldg collapse". It simply makes no sense unless he was saying they decided to bring it down.
amzuel420 1 year ago 5
@amzuel420 Then you got reports of people saying the building would be coming down...which would concur with what Silverstein said. When I watched the Popular Mechanics debate I noticed they started off calling people conspiracy nuts. How the hell smart you gotta be to figure this out when you add the hundreds of "odds beaters" to it. For Christ's sake they're trying to tell us that bomb proof buildings fall down because of fire and some debris? What made 5 and 6 such good buildings?
amzuel420 1 year ago
@amzuel420 If by "pull it" Silverstein meant to demolish the building, why would he admit to it on camera?
You ask why did only Silverstein's buildings fall? It might have something to do with the fact that he owned all the buildings at the WTC.
What are the odds that "truth"ers have a fully functioning brain among them?
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 I'd say the odds that truthers have a fully functioning brain are a lot better than the odd you do if you can make a call like that without the slightest bit of research. A smart mouth don't prove anything except maybe that you lack some social skills. Try some research.
amzuel420 8 months ago
@amzuel420 You obviously didn't do any research, or you would know that Silverstein owned every WTC building. Yet another "truth"er who claims to be basing his ideas on facts when he's just pulling shit out of his ass.
You also claim that the Popular Mechanics guys started off their Loose Change debate by calling people conspiracy nuts, which is totally false. Yet another "truth"er who is a bold-faced liar. In fact, Bermas started off by calling Popular Mechanics "yellow journalism". Class Act.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 I don't believe I ever said that those were the "only buildings that Silverstein owned". I said that the only buildings that ever fell because of a fire, were owned by Silverstein. You sound like a very skilled researcher. Unfortunately I don't care much for "researchers" that try to add meanings to my words .......have a nice day.
amzuel420 8 months ago
@amzuel420 'I don't believe I ever said that those were the "only buildings that Silverstein owned". I said that the only buildings that ever fell because of a fire, were owned by Silverstein.'
Now you're misquoting me, and yourself, too, actually. I never claimed that you said that. Here is what you said originally: "What are the odds that only Silverstein's bldgs would fall? Why not 5 or 6?"
To me, that conveys the belief that WTC 5 & 6 were not owned by Silverstein. Did I misinterpret?
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@amzuel420 "I said that the only buildings that ever fell because of a fire, were owned by Silverstein."
Why do "truth"ers keep bringing up the "fact" that no building has ever collapsed because of a fire, like it's relevant? Do they have to constantly be reminded that a 120-ton commercial jet slammed into each building?
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 You don't think that's relevant? And you claim to have done some actual research? And in case you didn't catch the news...no plane hit building 7...What's your excuse for that one? I say "excuse" because it pretty obvious that you're either trying to protect the government from something.or your trying to protect yourself from having to admit your government has screwed you...which is it?
amzuel420 8 months ago
@amzuel420 "You don't think that's relevant?"
No, it's not relevant because none of the buildings that collapsed were damaged ONLY by fire. 2 planes hit WTC 1 & 2, and a large portion of WTC 1 landed on WTC 7 and damaged it.
I believe our government screwed us, but not deliberately. They were incompetent. How the hell could they allow knives on airplanes? How could Bush sit in that classroom knowing that 2 planes had just crashed into the WTC? Bush was the worst 2 term president in history.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@amzuel420 If WTC 1, 2 & 7 were demolished, why did they wait so long to demolish them? The gov't must have known that people would be able to hear all those explosions, why would they let those witnesses live? It makes much more sense to demolish them immediately upon the plane's impact so that they could eliminate all potential witnesses of the detonations.
Why would they wait until the firefighters left WTC 7 to demolish it, when they didn't give a shit about all the ones inside WTC 1&2?
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 They didn't wait very long and people DID hear explosions. Good grief have you looked into this at all? Hundreds of people including fire fighters and police reported explosions. Have you ever heard of Barry Jennings? He was the Deputy Director of Emergency Services Department, (NY City Housing Authority)? And he was dead a short time after he gave this interview (watch?v=_DuSeuxjiJQ) . Many others that were witnesses are also dead.
amzuel420 8 months ago
@amzuel420 Please start reading my comments more than once before you reply. I said
"The gov't must have known that people would be able to hear all those explosions, why would they let those witnesses live? It makes much more sense to demolish them immediately upon the plane's impact so that they could eliminate all potential witnesses of the detonations."
I'm asking why the conspirators would allow people into and out of the buildings, creating hundreds of witnesses to the planted explosions.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@amzuel420 Good grief, have YOU looked into this at all? WTC 2 stood for 56 minutes, WTC 1 for 102 minutes, and WTC 7 for about 7 hours after WTC 1 fell on it. You don't think those are large periods of time?
There were hundreds, maybe thousands, of witnesses, and it's 10 years later. Of course some are going to die. Why would they kill Barry Jennings because of that interview? He doesn't add any new incriminating information. He just says what 100 other people have said: they heard explosions
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@amzuel420 Case-in-point: you just brought up the death of Barry Jennings. Yes, he supposedly heard explosions in WTC 7. Yes, he died after giving an interview about it. Yes, many other witnesses have also died. So what? None of that is PROOF of anything. So how can you demand proof from me? HYPOCRISY. It's laughable. You "truth"ers are nothing but living jokes.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 You see what you're doing? I answer every single question or doubt and you still wanna try and pull my chain. Then you try to insult me and call me stupid because I want some questions answer. I've tried to be benevolent and I've tried to show you some respect but you wanna know the truth? You make me sick. All you can do is try and cut down others to elevate yourself. Have a nice day. You're not worth talking to. And YOU are the joke...you just don't know it.
amzuel420 8 months ago
@amzuel420 You didn't answer anything, you nut.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 You're asking me questions I don't have an answer for. I don't know why they didn't demolish them on impact. If you look into it you find lots and lots of highly trained independent researchers and engineers saying it was demo. So if you're saying that I have to know "why" they did it to proves it was a demo...you're way off. That doesn't prove anything. Physical evidence proves things. You don't have to prove "why" a person killed someone to prove they killed someone.
amzuel420 8 months ago
@amzuel420 Those questions were rhetorical. I asked them to prove that they weren't deliberately demolished. Since you can't answer them, it proves my point. There's no logical reason why they would wait 7 hours to take down WTC 7.
You might have a point if there actually was hard evidence that they were demolished. But there isn't. The vast majority of "truth"ers simply point to inconsistencies in the "official" story to show that something's up.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@amzuel420 Your murder analogy is terrible. NO ONE, not even "truth"ers, think the government caused 9/11 just for the hell of it. They ALL say it was for some reason, usually oil and attacking the middle east. A better analogy would be: why would a murderer allow a person to witness a murder, and then just let that person live so they can tell the world what they saw you do? They wouldn't. They would do anything they could to minimize the risk of being caught.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@amzuel420 "Truth"ers are just like religious nuts. They need absolutely no real evidence whatsoever to believe what they believe, all they need or have is circumstantial evidence, but if someone tries to challenge their beliefs, they DEMAND solid proof. It's absolutely ridiculous. I'm starting to think that the entire "truth" movement is just one giant, disorganized conspiracy put forward by sociopaths who just want to piss off normal people because it amuses them.
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@amzuel420 "Truth"ers spend their entire worthless lives trying to come up with questions that the so-called "lie defenders" can't answer. I have questions that "truth"ers can't answer. But my questions are rational, unlike the bullshit "truth"ers spew, like "why did WTC 7 collapse?" and "Why is there no video of a plane hitting the pentagon?" and "why did WTC 1 fall so perfectly straight and at freefall speed?" and "why did people hear secondary explosions?" and "why does my life suck so hard?"
KayBeeEee1983 8 months ago
@KayBeeEee1983 you are so fucking stupid...those aren't bullshit questions at all. just keep shoving your head up your ass!
skeeterdude04 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@skeeterdude04 Get a job, loser.
KayBeeEee1983 7 months ago
you people are dumb for falling for this, you really think Davin Cobourn, one of the big wigs at popular mechanics is gonna take a call from some random guy about 9/11? like really i'm sure theres hundreds if not thousands of people who tried to get a hold of him, ya think he's gonna talk to each and every one of them? it's obvious that's not David Colbourn on the phone you gullable bastards. You people seriously piss me off it's just another bullshit theory just like JFK or pearl harbour!
400ex4stroke 1 year ago
9/11 was an inside job...
StopTheCorruption1 1 year ago 30
@StopTheCorruption1 i agree 100 percent
rockondon 1 year ago
@StopTheCorruption1 911 was an outside job
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Oz1976 hey oz... if you think that the 9/11 truth movement is so silly, then why are you even taking the time to fight against it? does it really need to be fought against? are you threatened by the truth movement? and why are you watching all of these videos if you don't have doubts about what really happened?
skeeterdude04 9 months ago
@skeeterdude04
1) putting in 9/11 in the search brings up all this bullshit
2) I choose to "fight against" the "truth" movement in the memory of the 3 friends I lost that day who these shitstains disparage their memories with convoluted conspiracy theories with no science to back them up.
3) I have zero doubts about what happened that day.
Oz1976 9 months ago
@Oz1976 Well im terribly sorry about the loss of your friends. but im surprised that the frustration of what you went through doesn't give you motivation to explore the possibility that maybe this wasn't just caused by al qaeda. im sorry but i think you may just want to deny it because it would just be too painful to bare that your friends could've been murdered by our own gov't. and you're wrong there is science to back it up. and it's completely natural to question the world we live in
skeeterdude04 9 months ago
@skeeterdude04 Who says it didn't? Unfortunately, after the initial seduction of the conspiracy theory wears off and you put it up against the science and evidence. The "inside job" conspiracy theory falls apart. There is no science backing up the conspiracy theory my friend. The "science" you speak off is not peer reviewed. The Journal for 9/11 Studies is a sham. They only "publish" science that fits their agenda. Hell the head and editor is Steven Jones. Not one CT Whitepaper has been..cont
Oz1976 9 months ago
@skeeterdude04 published in a respected peer reviewed scientific journal.
Respected Chemistry Journals: Accounts of Chemical Research, Angewandte Chemie, Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan, Canadian Journal of Chemistry, Chemical Communications, Chemical Reviews, Chemistry Letters, Journal of the American Chemical Society, Helvetica Chimica Acta
Respected Physics Journals: Advances in Physics, American Journal of Physics,
Journal of Physics, New Journal of Physics
Not 1 CT paper
Oz1976 9 months ago
@StopTheCorruption1
Shame your dad did an inside job on your mom.
Retard.
SquareRo0o0t 8 months ago
@StopTheCorruption1
Truthers are morons.
June28July 8 months ago
Popular Mechanics could not have chosen a more stupid person to fact check than Davin Coburn. He alone makes a huge mockery of the Official Story and any clown who believes the Official Story. Thank You Davin Coburn from all in the 9/11 truth movement, you're a tremendous help to our cause son!
noozilander 1 year ago
thats why you can't give the truth movement your real info. Because they will keep on harassing you with stupid ass questions.
taledarkside 1 year ago
I'm gonna call this number... lol
jim148able 1 year ago
I knew it !! is a goverment aparato is not free nor truthful
ElPeruanoUFO 1 year ago
hahaha ownage yeah right that was pathetic the truthers must be getting desperate
rigatony019 1 year ago
So davin is a guy that writes article but doesn't know about them... he speaks nice tou he is just trained for that... I want the truth! nothing more
ElPeruanoUFO 1 year ago
@ElPeruanoUFO
watch
911 PASSENGERS FICTITIOUS
SEPTEMBER CLUES
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Someone tell me how exactly "truther" is used as an insult by NeoCon media?
"truther"....people who seek the truth? How is that a bad thing?
SaveSoaps 1 year ago
he isnt owning the popular mechanics guy.the popular mechanics guy is being smart.why try to explain somthing to someone who already has it in their head that our goverment did it.not to mention every time a truther gets proven wrong they want to deny facts.
tgrfan42069 1 year ago
@tgrfan42069
Facts like Bush Senior did not meet with Bin Laden's Brother on 9/11, that the Carlyle Group did not host a conference at a Washington hotel. Among the guests of honour was a valued investor: Shafig bin Laden, brother to Osama.
9/11 was staged idiot.
pionata 1 year ago
you are the idiot for believing the hog wash.that loose change feeds you.what mindless sheep you are.
tgrfan42069 1 year ago
@tgrfan42069
And you believe Fox News, boy that's original.
SaveSoaps 1 year ago
You are indeed an idiot man, took me like 10 minutes of research to realize that 9/11 must have been a staged event.
Xendrius 1 year ago
@Xendrius
watch
911 TABOO
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@Xendrius it took me 10 second to realize that loose change was paranoid conspiracy theory, but im still studying the mechanism of these theories. Memes are intresting.
biodroid 1 year ago
@tgrfan42069 -Sorry bra, but the gov has lied to us before, what in gods name makes you believe that they wouldn't do it again?!?!? Over 56 THOUSAND U.S. troops died in Vietnam over a LIE to get us into the war with them (I.e. gulf of Ton-kin) Throw another 70 thousand on top of that who where scarred for life from shell-shock over the war they fought only to come home and have pieces of shit like yourself spit on them for doing what the government made them do. Over a lie
Nazzafied 1 year ago
@Nazzafied uh my dad fought in nam so to say i spat on people coming home from nam is just pathetic.fucking hippie i bet you are the one who spat on them.
tgrfan42069 1 year ago
@tgrfan42069 My father fought in Nam as well. How could I be a hippie if I hate them as well. Ask your father why he went to Nam and he himself will prolly tell you like mine did, "Over a lie". I WILL, however, spit on any1 that tries to tell me 911 ISNT a cover-up, then proceed to kick the living shit outta them for trying to get me to conform. Dont let these idiot nay-sayers get you to believe what your own eyes, ears and mind tell you is the truth... God bless ur pops by the way.
Nazzafied 1 year ago
you.are.conforming,
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution just watched it. im familiar with this theory but never saw this particular vid. thanks for the laughs.
"Human Nature is easily fooled and Most people base their views on subjective Emotion and whats Popular" try to wrap your brain around this... 9/11 truth is very popular. if youll notice on most vid threads on the topic the truthers vastly outnumber the debunkers like an infestation. who are the freethinkers again?
now go drink your raw organic vegan koolaid
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
actually you stand corrected, 911 Truth is a very tiny segment of videos on here compared to the Tribute videos and those promoting and defending the official story. Fact is Most Americans have NO interest in 911 either way and have long forgotten about and have no more interest in it regardless of what anyone says.
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
its only a correction if its true nice attempt however. OBVIOUSLY the tribute videos outnumber everything but once again truther vids vs. debunker vids... truther vids win by a vast majority and that is simple fact.
im very impressed with your copy and paste abilities which everyone knows is a truthers best friend, especially since you consider poorly made videos, montages with scary music and out of context sound bytes as hard evidence... you are victim of the 911 lies movement sir
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
If we take the # of Americans that are interested in 911, which is a very small minority to begin with as most have no interest in any of this whatsoever and are mezmerized by Tiger woods sex life and want to know every minute detail of it, and other such asinine nonsense
out of that # , Most obviously fully believe the Official Story. I can easily correct you all day Long every day. You sound quite naive, clueless and ignorant
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
wait what does tiger have to do with any of this? haha i sound ignorant because i dont believe your rhetoric? no wonder i knew your word wasnt worth anything from the get go. you are not correcting me you are just repeating your own false presumptions. fact is their is nothing you can copy and paste to me that hasnt been copy and pasted to me by a hundred other brainwashed kookspiracy theorists so you may as well quit trying. the truthers are desperate and you are prime example
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
also why do you sound so angry, emotional and defensive about this ? You sound personally offended and irritated in your comments
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution its a common symthom of schitzofrenia, just saying...
biodroid 1 year ago
@biodroid
make sure you watch
THEORY OF GHOSTPLANE
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@rigatony019
and No there are definitely NOT more Truther vids on here than those that are promoting and endorsing the official story
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
hhaha also i just did an experiment and plainly typed "9/11" and the first 3 vids are tributes... from then on with a couple exceptions are truther vids haha real valiant effort but eventual fail as all truthers do. i guess you like most people choose to believe whats popular. most people are wrong about most things most of the time...you
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
wowh, you really are quite desperate arent you. Here you are actually trying to say that MOST people in the world believe 911 was an inside Job ? This is so strange, because you guys always say those that believe it was a scam are a small minority of fools and whackos.
Now here you are saying the complete opposite ???
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
i dont speak for all people who believe the official story, i speak for myself. give me 15 seconds and ill find 2 mouthbreathing truthers that contradict each other, what does that prove? i must conclude that the majority of people within the youtube community are undoubtedly truthers. YT is the truthers creed after all. dont take my word for it, type in "9/11" and see for yourself.
and dont worry im not angry im actually still trying to figure out im discouraged by your density or just amused
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
We have guys on here on your side saying that Only 100 to 150 people saw the Planes in nyc on 911, Others say oh No they are dead wrong, it was MILLIONS of people who saw the Planes
ok, we have a massive and huge contradiction here, so who is Right and why cant you guys agree on how many people saw planes ????
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@LifeRegenRevolution like i said give me 15 seconds and i can find 2 twoofers on your side that contradict each other... what does that prove? nothing
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
watch the video series
911 CONTINUOUS PIECES
its done by Jeff Hill, the same guy making phone call on this video
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
truther a: the building fell too perfectly in its own footprint ith little debris it must have been a cont. demo.
truther b: there were massive amounts of debris and steel seen shooting out of the towers even lodged into neighboring buildings indicating explosives.
does that contradiction mean all truthers are wrong? i mean, they are but not for that reason.
also why exactly would i want to base my opinion on some crosseyed mouth breathers smart ass prank calls? keep in mind im not 15 anymore
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019
so the most Multi faceted intricate complex Event in American history was all due to Nothing more than 19 Crazy Arab video game nerds waving rusty box cutters ?
thats it, not anything more to the story huh LOL
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Now you're really stretching it. I wouldn't say its the most complex event to ever happen...
Also, there's a lot more to the story, just not the part about the US gov being implicite in it
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019 When a building collapses there isn't any energy strong enough within the building to eject any type of steel frames outward. Only way that could have happened is if there had been some sort of energy within the building . otherwise reffered to explosives.
TheRevealingTruth 1 year ago
@TheRevealingTruth there most certainly could be enough pressure built up inside to eject debris. Windows floors below often blow out during collapses in buildings smaller than this so its not that hard to believe. It is hard to believe that a building could be demolished with silent explosive however.
rigatony019 1 year ago
@rigatony019 You are wrong, the debris wouldn't be pushed out of the windows from 80 floors below where the impact was.There is video footage of this. If it fell in a "pancake motion", the debris would be pushed out of every window around the building right under each floor that is collapsing,NOT 80 floors BELOW where it starts to fall, and from ONE designated spot to the other. That theory is bullshit,most people haven't heard of the pools of molten metal at the bottom that contained THERMITE!
topherlinc 1 year ago
@rigatony019 My bad, it DID fall in a pancake motion, what i meant was that the results of the debris pushing out the windows was not due to the collapse, but i am sure you figured that out =p
topherlinc 1 year ago
@topherlinc You are a very funny guy. you owned by your self :)
xtasytube 1 year ago
@rigatony019 Also keep in mind the wtc collapsed in a " Pancake Fashion". So therefor the mass from the bottom of the building should have been strong enough to withstand the top of the building from collapsing. So it would loose speed as it fell never would it gain speed. Both wtc fell near free fall speed. thats incredible.
TheRevealingTruth 1 year ago
@rigatony019
watch
911 TABOO
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
@Nazzafied
This guy Jeff Hill making this call has a great video series on here titled
911 CONTINUOUS PIECES
LifeRegenRevolution 1 year ago
Many clouds you see are not natural but created from "chemtrails". It's a secret worlwide spraying program! Check out my channel for eye-witness video, search YouTube for "Don't Talk About the Weather" and "Aerosol Crimes".
TrutherD1 2 years ago
Search:
"9/11 second explosion"
"fema 9/11 tuesday"
"news error 9/11"
"building 7"
"9/11 molten steel"
"scalar weapon 9/11"
"9/11 black boxes"
"thermite 9/11"
Don't let the paid agents all over YouTube waste your time with stupid arguments. The most important thing you can do is learn more and wake others ASAP. Good luck!
TrutherD1 2 years ago