New Yorkers United for Marriage: Vows TV Ad

[vidhead85]

I have to say that this video sucks. They don't touch, they're not affectionate at all. I wouldn't think that they've been together that long from looking at this

[vidhead85]

You need to see the Australian video "it's time" the ones made in the US suck.

[YOURpervertexposer]

Where's the two men in their cesspoolian norms, thongs, (if that) humping and playing in their sewer holes of their backsides? I mean come on folks. Let's not just advert a couple old, bitter feminist women who don't represent "sodom" in any way shape or form. Let's just show the world your toxic anal cavity, frothing crap, lube and diseased, videos they were all excited about during their campaign to destroy Governor Perry. Who, since he's a RINO was the last person they should worry about.

[TMBrd89]

@YOURpervertexposer You are a sociopath.

[SweetSodaChick]

@YOURpervertexposer Hahahahaha. You're hilarious.

Opposition to gay rights would be half what it is today, if people didn't see two men innocently holding hands in the grocery store, and for some reason I'll never understand, in their perverted minds, they imagine the two fucking like bunnies.

[mynameisbecka]

marriage equality to all and to all a good night!!!

[Tatsuyoujo]

29 years. 29 years, and still going. How can anyone hate this? WHY would anyone hate this?

[bonkuraysan]

i hope all goes well for you guys in your cause, im cheering for ya.

[bethcole100]

Yay I hope we take steps in the right direction instead of regression equal rights for all

[newyorkequality]

These two ladies do not know what the true value of a man is. Consequently they do not lnow what the true value of a woman is. Together, they can never create a complete family. Their relationship cannot be compared to what a marriage is. They want to turn marriage into a domestic partnership for the rest of society. Back off ladies, you do not qualify. Nature discriminates for good reasons.

[Lemquennel]

@newyorkequality You're actions are those of a condescending putz. You assume many things to build your fallacious argument. You assume that neither woman has been in a heterosexual relationship prior to discovering their true sexuality. You assume that there is intrinsic value to the male aspect of a heterosexual relationship without any rational argument for this point. You assume they have no model heterosexual relationships, such as, their parents. You assume that heterosexual relationships

[Lemquennel]

@newyorkequality have the propensity to have more stable or 'complete' marriages than homosexuals, when the heterosexual divorce rate is much higher, despite the fact that most gays can't even marry. You assume that these ladies are after domestic partnership or that their marriage is equatable with domestic partnership or that their marriage has any effect on other marriages. You assume that discrimination based on irrational notions such as these is natural, and that nature is always good. In

[Lemquennel]

@newyorkequality short, you couldn't be acting like more of a presumptuous tool.

[Lemquennel]

@newyorkequality Actually, I didn't attack you at all. If you read with a little more care you would notice that I was attacking your assumption, and the way you're acting. I never made a character judgement. Obviously, I've never met you. The way you're acting, however, is clear. Explain these outrageous things you're calling "facts" and maybe you'll stop looking like a (rather half-fast) anti-rights bigot (because better attempts have been tried and failed to shut up the equality movement.)

[Lemquennel]

@newyorkequality Again, that is an apt summary of your actions. You are acting like a presumptuous tool. You can try to prove me wrong, but I doubt you can.

[lacethis]

YAY!

It's about time, new york needs to get with the times.

[crashandtumble8]

LOVE this video.....Hope New York makes the obvious decision!

[EmeraldView]

Well if you're gay, allegedly, then how about you STOP acting like a jackass and tossing intended-to-be-derogatory terminology at straight people, most of whom are our friends, families, and allies that support equal rights for gay people.

You are only helping to harm the cause.

By-the-way, you DO also realize, I presume, that some gay people also 'breed'.

[mohelm123]

Beautiful. True love.

[LesbionixComic]

That is just BEAUTIFUL! Hard to believe that anyone with more than ONE BRAIN CELL would be against this!!!!!!!!

[pisaltouch]

so inspiring...

[arab4ever]

Wow this is so sweet.

[speanburgspear]

Great couple, how great it is to see same sex couples profess their love. How sad it is that these loving women will be judged as anything other than a loving couple. Hope we see marriage for all in NY. I couldn't wait anymore and married in Mass last year. Still hoping here and across the country.

[deeter131]

I am aware that there have been videos made with gay men, I was referring to actual TV ads.that run on tv, and not just on websites.

[deeter131]

do 99%of all gay tv ads use lesbian couples because somehow that seems more acceptable to the breeders? because i have yet to see a commercial like this with 2 men. just curious

[peterquint]

@deeter131 Look up "Love and Marriage" on the BasicRights YT page. :)

[Vethorn]

@deeter131 Honestly, I think you are absolutely correct. For some reason, that I will never understand, it is more socially acceptable to the hetero-population to see a lesbian couple than a gay male couple. I think straight men, the ones who are really pulling the strings, are all for four boobs and two vagina.

[EmeraldView]

@deeter131 Deeter131 are you some sort of anti-gay troll? Who talks like that? Breeders? Get the hell out of here.

[deeter131]

@EmeraldView No I am not an anti gay troll which would be odd since I am gay, but your paranoia would lead me to believe that it is YOU who should go away. unbunch your panties queen, and get off your cross.