Lol nice to see linux being hated. It saves people who can program from dealing with people who know nothing about os' and how computers work. Oh and people will be venerable to attacks, Lol I'm looking at you windows. And Mac but not so glaringly. Windows still is best for gamers. Mac is best for graphics and web design. Linux and unix flavors are for programmers and hackers who know more about computers. To each his own suits.
Actually, Windows is better for both. There's absolutely no inherent advantages to using Macs for graphics or web design. Absolutely none. Their hardware is limited in comparison to a PC, their LED displays are pretty, but can't hold up against Dell UltraSharps or NECs running at 2560x1600 with much higher quality. Linux I'll agree with you there. Excellent for infrastructure. Between Win and OSX however, there's simply no comparison.
"MkLinux was the first attempt by Apple to support a free and open source software project." Now OSX's whole kernel is open source the idea of open source they took from Linux.
@THUSxFAR WOAH! You Troll! I was supporting Macs! Damn I hate Trolls! I have a decent Tower! I didn't Buy wrong Hardware, the Tower is like 3 years old so it's not compatible with the newest cards. Daaaaaaaaaamn, I hate Trolls. BTW I don't use LINUX because I don't, simple as that.
There is no such thing as "Proper Hardware", that is just made up. Second you assume based on little to no information. My Tower is 3 years old, got it from iBuyPower, still works fine.
@ActionScripter9109 Yea I know, Haters gonna Hate Trolls gonna Troll. My Computer still works just fine, has about 2 years left b4 it's 100% obsolete. I was playing around with OSX Lion the other day and it works really well, I guarantee that all PC-(Nazi)-Fanboy arguments are all about specs, when there much more than just the flat specs of the system.
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD Not Really, Hackintosh builds are limited to specific hardware, I own a custom tower I built myself and a Macbook Air, I don't care about linux because I don't code in C++, I don't waste money as I would rather have the base Macbook Pro/Air instead of my previous $800 HP, that was defective b4 it left china.
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD Pretty sure Macs and Windows or custom based systems have pros and cons. If you have never had extensive experience with both platforms then you cannot understand both. If you want full control over your system and accepting risk then that is your choice, as with my custom system. Apple's hardware is expensive, but you get what you pay for. Both systems can co-exists, and I really am tired of these fan-boy arguments that consist of nothing more than ignorant, Blind Hate
@TheSecretCobra you still have yet to actually give any factual evidence. I can deduce whether or not a linux distro is worth noting based on what it entails. You, like every single mac fan-boy, are still hiding behind your "you need to try it" veil. If you want a simplistic OS that is hardly compatible with anything use ubunto, if you want something more complex and versatile use arch. OSX however is overpriced and is configurable in hardly any respects.
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD lol, not a mac fan-boy, you need to stop trolling. You realize that Open GL is a Superior platform. OSX is a great OS, the OS is not overpriced it's $30 per upgrade. Macs, and Mac Hardware is not overpriced, it's proprietary so it's more expensive. Overpriced refers to something exactly the same but priced higher. I can run SC2 on a Mac, but if I want to run Unreal3 theres a problem right? Wrong, BootCamp is 100% Free and runs windows just fine.
@TheSecretCobra You can create a hackintosh for less than a mac that runs exactly the same. Even if some hardware is restricted it is still fully possible to do it for far less.
As for your mom being unable to utilize a simple machine ubuntu would work fine, and Windows7 isn't rocket science. What is she doing anyway? checking her e-mail and using MS word?
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD Ok You do realize that the hardware of the system determines it's capabilities. Hackintosh builds only work with specific and sometimes inferior hardware. An iMac with a 4-core-i7 is better than a Hackintosh with a core2duo. Also my mother is very tech savvy and has used windows for years. She wants something rock-solid that is more stable. For her simplicity is what she wants as do I with a laptop. You are just ignorant and obviously have nothing more than hate to offer
The fact of the matter is that I could build a hackintosh for cheaper than an imac with better hardware. And if she's tech savvy in the least she'll understand that ubuntu is much more simple and reliable and stable than OSX.
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD When it comes to my custom tower, or another computer for a specific task or reason, I want full control over the build. For someone like my mom who doesn't, an iMac would suit her great. A Macbook Air has great performance, can dual-boot windows 7, and is great on the go. The specs are fine for the unit. When was the last time you have seen a laptop with 100% customization anyway? You are trying to compare different philosophic ideas in computing.
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD You strike me as a PC-NAZI-FANBOY, spuing Blind Hate about something you obviously no nothing about. I am not a fan-boy, more of a neutral party who looks at pros and cons rather than automatically favoring 1 side over the other.
@TheSecretCobra You still haven't given a single reason why mac is good at all and that is why I am classifying you as a mac fanboy, because just like them you fail to give a single reason as to why apple is a good company or why their products are at all good.
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD The Macbook Air will boot in 12-15 seconds. Macs are more reliable. OSX is more stable than windows. It is cheaper to upgrade OSX. Better customer support. Virtually no Fail-Rate for systems. Just because models are updated deos not make previous ones obsolete. I have friends that have working PowerMac G4 that are just fine, my Pentium 4 crapped out years ago. I could go on but I am getting tier of feeding trolls. I feel like I am running a Zoo lately.
@TheSecretCobra Where are you sourcing your info that macs are more reliable and more stable than windows? It isn't cheaper to upgrade OSX because OSX is the only OS that requires money to update. And I never said anything about outdated models, but the fact that they're selling outdated hardware for more money than newer hardware is absurd.
and funny as shit..as the mac guy in this video ends up with the child molester * thank all that is sane that fag is dead* 's one glove thing going on.LOL. and yeah..MY first pc a Dell 100d smartstep.did RARELY suffer from a driver crashing in xp 32 bit. since thing ( more than 10 years ago..) i've custom built my own pc's and NEVER had a problem unless I was learning something through trail and error like the first time i tried overclocking.
A good scene would be one where PC breaks his pencil. He just takes his pencil from his pocket, throws it away, gets a new one and puts it in his pocket.
The Mac would also have a broken pencil, but it would be glued to hit jacket, which are glued to his pants, which in turn are glued to his shoes with socks glued-on. He'd change all of his clothes and pay a lot of money :D
@anon7320 dont forget you just like everyone else was once a COMPUTER NOOB. meaning you didn't know shit about how to search for things, including update drivers for your hardware. thus only IDIOTS forget to be humble enough to THINK about what (want-to-be) constructive criticism they want to give and instead give a random, pointless, assuming insult to the general crowd. wow I think i know who's done that before. EVERY PRESIDENT OF THE divided states of america. Barry Soetoro now included
@chronofusion You have to be pretty silly to not know how to get proper drivers. I've always gotten the right drivers even back when using '98 when I was 7. These days it's ridiculously easy. What's the problem? A little google search too tough? Not insulting the general crowd, just people that constantly need to be spoon fed everything, and when it's given to them, they still can't figure it out. Oh well, more work for us. And I couldn't give two shits about the u s of a. HAVE A NICE DAY!! =D
I say they should have some really old dude in a wheel chair be dos and start bragging about history of like "when I was young" crap like that.
Then one of them should point out that you have to use an emulator to use dox anymore, then have mac say that you have to use that same emulator to run windows 1,2, and 3.
I think it would be funny
for those who don't know the dos emulator is called "dosbox".
@1Pantikian Yes, going with a mac that plays what games? Oh yeah they don't play games, and YES you can buy graphics cards i'm 11 years old and i know more than you. Go online you can find A ton of graphics card. But I don't care you can go but a Apple Mac Book (Crap Book). Who agrees with me?
@FSXUSER10 lol, youre 11. i have been looking for laptop graphics cards (there is a difference), and no, you cannot buy laptop graphics cards, not even from the graphics card companies. You can look for them on ebay but in order for someone to be selling on they would have to take it out of their own laptop and currently not many people are doing that.
@jaymezavirus fucking pinguy and ubuntu does not work on the hp mini 1000, 60% of the drivers do not work out of the box and probably will never be resolved, both work great on the aspire one, so I could blame HP.
Ahhh yes, the "Same article" he was referring to, the one I posted.
"ThinkPad T61 with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS was consuming 14% more power than Windows 7, but when both were loaded with NVIDIA's binary driver that leverages PowerMizer and other power-savings techniques, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS averaged to consume just 4% more power."
- Which means......AGAIN.......that an OS that requires HALF the system resources of Windows 7 STILL sucked more 4%-14% MORE power than Windows 7.
You make the lower system requirements sound like a bad thing. System requirements have little impact on power consumption. Unfortunately drivers often play a bigger role here though Windows itself has pretty good power management capabilities. Do the lower requirements of Ubuntu mean Windows 7 was "instantly annihilated"? That said, you realize 4% of roughly 3 hours (not sure on what the total battery life is of the T61) is only 7.2 minutes right?
@LordDestros Not to mention those results were only for two computers (for which each had vastly different results) and only while the OS's were in their idle states.
Google's Chrome OS is also linux based and geek . com found that with the Cr-48 it lasted roughly 8 hours with Quote "5 hours of Hulu videos, roughly an hour of streaming music, and intermittent browsing" so uber is wrong when he says linux, what he should be saying is ubuntu, as linux is obviously more than just ubuntu.
benjy288: ""there is not a huge difference in performance between Microsoft Windows 7 Professional and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS."
- What the idiot forgot to mention is that Linux requires ohhhhhh, half the resources of Windows 7? Isn't that the Linux-fanboy argument? And the best it could muster was "not a huge difference?"
Hahahahahahahahahaha!! It's SO EASY sometimes! Jesus!
Source "phoronx is Windows 7 Actually Faster Than Ubuntu 10.04?" "What these results do show is that Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" is very capable of being a comparable gaming platform to Microsoft Windows at least as far as the quantitative performance is concerned"
@Ocelot152 more code? that doesn't mean crap. Snow Leopard is much better than Windows 7, simpler, can run just about anything you want, and has 9-14 LESS GB than Windows. those 20-40 million codes you're talking about, is just stuff of drivers (getting, installing, using), not actually native tasks. Mac can leave out all that bull crap.
Ummm, no, it can't. Software versatility is one of the biggest hangups of SL. That's why Apple thanks their lucky stars every night that Microsoft, in their GENEROSITY, allowed Apple to run Windows via Bootcamp.
Actually, a full-fledged Snow Leopard install is around 13GB. A full-fledged Windows 7 install is about 16GB.
Finally, CNET showed Windows 7 kicking the living snot out of Snow Leopard....on a Macbook Pro, no less. Woops!! Guess Snow Leopard ISN'T better than Windows
@TheUberDeity Full fledged install of snowleopard includes an extra dozen or so gigabytes of software. Windows 7, you get IE and a trial of office. That's pretty much. . . nothing.
And its funny how everybody thinks a "faster" computer is automatically better. Not the case. In terms of performance, I'd love to see one windows 7 machine in real life go a few days without slowing down. My brother's over powered hard wired Win7 computer slows down if he doesn't reboot/reset every day.
@LordDestros OSx does come with some great software. Since you're already paying for the software, it's not free, but it does make the value of the operating system go up substantially. Honestly, mac is geared for specific tasks and those specific tasks it does great. An example would be music recording with Garage Band. It does everything Pro Tools does, and it comes with OSx. Another example is Adobe's Creative Suite.
Anyway, just try to keep an open mind about mac. They're not that terrible.
But many people do not need such software included with iLife or already have superior programs. Others may find Windows Live or other free programs to be more than sufficient for their needs. These people see no benefit from having it.
How Adobe CS an example? It is multi-platform and isn't free with Mac OS X.
"They're not that terrible."
I don't believe their terrible but rather are overpriced and as a result are worse than many other PCs.
@LordDestros I wasn't speaking for all people, as though all people should use OSx, and that OSx is best for everyone. Please do not make assumptions.
Adobe CS is an example of a piece of software which the mac is geared for. I stated so very plainly in my comment. I never suggested that it was free with OSx, nor did I state that it was only for the mac. Your reading comprehension ability is a bit lacking, or you are too impatient when you read a person's words.
My point is value is subjective. Some people see it as an added value whereas others see it as an inconvenience. I understand you weren't speaking of it as superior for all people.
Regarding Adobe CS: And I still don't see what you mean. You aren't explaining how Macs are any better for Adobe CS than non-Mac PCs. E.g. CS4 was an example of a program that clearly performed worse on Mac OS X than on Windows. It's as if I claim Windows is geared for Safari. What does that even mean?
@LordDestros It is widely known and accepted among professional designers that Adobe products (dreamweaver, photoshop, fireworks, flash, etc..) have next to no chance of crashing on a mac as opposed to a windows machine. This is why most professional designers use mac as opposed to windows. You'll also find this in the music industry.
In all other industries, you'll find Windows far superior with far more market share (except for professional servers, these use AIX or a Unix/Linux distro).
@mhaneline "It is widely known and accepted among professional designers...."
And I disagree. Adobe applications specifically tend to favor Windows in general over Mac OS X. Hence the reasons Windows received native/optimized x64 binaries first as well as the reason Apple hates Flash. Further many designers often use Windows for various Windows-specific software such as 3DS Studio Max or Linux for animation/rendering.
@LordDestros And how many designers have you worked with professionally? Do you work in the industry as I do? I didn't even originally comment to argue, just to let you know that mac is widely used for designers and sound engineers. It is factual and I am sorry if it bothers you. Take care.
@mhaneline "...just to let you know that mac is widely used for designers and sound engineers."
And I'm not debating that; you're previous comments don't reflect this statement. Stating "Adobe CS is an example of a piece of software which the mac is geared for" or that such programs have "have next to no chance of crashing on a mac as opposed to a windows machine" is simply untrue as far as I'm concerned. If you want I can post links to crash logs as examples.
Widely accepted? And you have proof of this? Sources to back this up? Reputable sources, I might add...not your basement-dwelling wannabe vector graphic artist.
Even Adobe openly admitted that their products ALWAYS run better on PC, not Mac. Here's a tip. Being a designer or a music producer does N-O-T make you a computer expert in any way, shape or form in any reality. Period. They're overpriced, underpowered, terribly exploitable, and outdated.
@TheUberDeity It looks as though we are the same age. Why do we not both act the same age? I think that you would do well to take a step back and ask yourself why you are conversing on the internet. What are your goals? If your goal is simply to insult people, I would seriously urge you to rethink your moral standard.
Not that I am obliged to provide evidence, but I specialize in load-balanced parallel process transaction-based applications supporting thousands of concurrent connections.
So what you've basically said is that you come here to formulate opinions, instead of quoting sources.
Thanks! I just wanted to clarify. Next time don't drop a comment like "It's a well known fact that...." without actually having......y'know.....facts to back it up. Me? I've already got one up on you, and it's a pretty simple one. I'm still waiting for you to come up with counter-evidence instead of saying "I do this n' that," which means sweet fanny ass in the long run.
@TheUberDeity No. I read your smug comments and thought to myself "Here is a person who has a very biased opinion on a subject which I feel I have more experience in. Perhaps I can share my experiences, as far as the industry I work in is concerned, and help him see things from a different perspective".
After conversing with you a bit, I have come to the realization that you, for whatever reason, do not act your age or conduct yourself in a respectful manor. Not a man of intellect, but spite.
@TheUberDeity I'm choosing to ignore your first statement as an immature tirade. Please do try to act your age, you are a grown man.
Now then, if you were to tell me that a certain machine sold better than another (I see that you are a salesman), that it was a matter of fact in your industry, as a rational adult, I would take you for your word. If I were an immature dolt, I might demand proof and go off on a tangent such as you have below. It's a good thing that I am not an immature dolt.
This coming from the guy who says "the fact is....." without providing any concrete evidence, which is precisely what this argument (ie: killing) is all about.
Please, run along, child. You can't compete with me no matter how hard you try. Now you're just wasting my time, and you aren't privileged enough for that.
@TheUberDeity I see that it is too much to ask for you to act your age. Understood. I wonder if your boss or peers would have a shred of respect for you if they knew this is how you conduct yourself off-hours.
It is not my responsibility to prove anything to you. The top design firms around the world design on macs using adobe software. That you don't know this is, in and of itself, enough proof to show your lack of knowledge on the topic. You can throw an immature tantrum all you want though.
Actually.....son, I am the Boss :) I'm a University-educated Photonic Engineer who builds industrial laser machines for a living....from scratch, and exports all over the world.
The "top design firms" aren't computer-savvy. Very few companies are. Try not to confuse "designer" with "computer expert," hmmm? You're embarrassing yourself something awful. On my channel is a comparison of the 12-Core Mac Pro vs. a custom-built PC.
@TheUberDeity Ignoring yet another immature attack. Can you please stop with them? It's pointless.
I don't think many people would dispute the fact that adobe software is faster on windows than mac. What designers are concerned about is the operating system having a memory or IO fault. When it comes to design, people trust mac not to crash on them just like people such as myself trust operating systems like AIX to run mission-critical applications and databases instead of windows server.
See a Windows 7 machine go a few days without slowing down? I've got....count em......FIFTEEN computers running Windows 7 both at home, on my laptops, and at work, with ZERO slowdown, and they've been running W7 for the last 16 months.
FAILURE #2.
Your "brothers" computer (I doubt he has one) is either a piece of shit, or your brother is such a tech-illiterate moron that he actually made an effort to fuck up Windows 7.
@TheUberDeity Right. . . because my brother only taught me almost everything I know about windows. I'm not talking younger brother. I'm talking older. Dude, yo sound like you just think you know EVERYTHING about computers just because you know windows. Give yourself a break and learn everything. I don't get my information from a few little sources. I learn everywhere.
And, many OEM and clean installs come with trials of crapware. Ufail
My little friend, I regularly run Ubuntu, Mint, OpenSUSE, and Snow Leopard on my machine for continuous testing and education purposes. Your last comments made an IDIOT out of you, and LordDestros and I proved it.
There IS no Office Free trial, despite the silliness you posted in your comment that baffled everyone with your utter buffoonery. You know N-O-T-H-I-N-G about Windows, computers, or OS's in general.
@TheUberDeity Right, and I'm not learning? I am learning. I constantly look up everything I can to figure out what I can do. I have succesfully gotten USB drives to boot off of every PC I've come in contact with. But that's not even a percent of what I've gotten to know. If you're so great, why don't you prove yourself by building a version of windows that ACTUALLY WORKS.
And that Office free trials is what happened to me every time. fuck that. Open Office FTW.
Yeah, OpenOffice :) Hahahahaha! Try constructing a PowerPoint presentation for a large company in OO, put it on a USB stick, come to work, and then load it up onto an actual PowerPoint program from MS Office.
It'll be a fucking disaster. I've tried. OO might be free, but there's almost always a catch with open sourced stuff.
Proven quite easily by the long list of 64-Bit Linux bugs that currently plague the latest distros.
@TheUberDeity "It'll be a fucking disaster. I've tried."
I've had the same issue with simply using varying versions of MSO PowerPoint (Office 2008 -> 2007, 2007 -> 2003, 2003 -> 2000) at times so that issue isn't unique to Open Office.
I'm not talking about that at all. I'm talking about building a PowerPoint presentation in OpenOffice and then opening it up with Office Powerpoint. Linux Mint refers to OO as "a near-drop in replacement for Microsoft Office," which clearly it is not.
@TheUberDeity And my point is even Microsoft Office PowerPoint can't open Microsoft Office PowerPoint files correctly at all times. In either case, my own preferred Office suite would probably be Lotus Symphony after MSO '10.
@TheUberDeity You can say it's a child-os all you want. It still doesn't change the fact that Windows is also trying to be a hold-your-hand OS along with them. MS office seems bloated with visual features. OpenOffice in my experience works faster, better, and doesn't have that visual bloat. And, if Mac OS has so many security issues (and is used in almost any workplace), why aren't hackers all up on them to take down companies and other crap like that. Don't blame it on low marketshare!
So the next time you bash an OS that you just can't grasp, you might want to look at YOUR OS of choice. Not only is Linux chock-full of bugs, but the graphical performance is subpar (despite having almost half the necessary system requirements) it has a power consumption rate 48% bigger than that of Windows (run it on a laptop, I dare you), and you're stuck with broom-closet drivers and third-rate open-source knockoffs of better programs.
@TheUberDeity I will quote you on this one "And you have proof of this? Sources to back this up? Reputable sources"
Regarding your comment on "Not only is Linux chock-full of bugs, but the graphical performance is subpar (despite having almost half the necessary system requirements) it has a power consumption rate 48% bigger than that of Windows (run it on a laptop, I dare you), and you're stuck with broom-closet drivers and third-rate open-source knockoffs of better programs"
Oh geez! I goofed :) Remember how you're always saying that I never admit when I'm wrong? Well, that ain't true. Turns out I was wrong about Linux consuming 48% more power than Windows 7.
It's actually 56% more power. D'oh! Do I ever feel silly :)
@TheUberDeity Yes i thought you would say that, which only proves how dumb you truly are,
"The results from this OpenGL game testing are similar to that of our workstation results earlier this month: for the most part, there is not a huge difference in performance between Microsoft Windows 7 Professional and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS." you said sub-par graphical performance?
And ubuntu 10.04 used 1 watt more power on a Lenovo ThinkPad T61 in idle state only, you said "run it on a laptop, I dare you".
Damn!! What a shame that nobody except Linux is using OpenGL these days! Even the OpenGL community and every single developer dropped support for the platform!
This is 2010, kiddo, not 2003. Time to buy a watch.
I just quoted a source for power consumption which MURDERS you (again). I'm not the Linux-hater anyways. xyz is, and I'll let him continue to beat your ass every single day, in and out. You're a time waster. I just walked by to slap you in the face :)
@TheUberDeity And i quoted the same source for power consumption, and you are aware that only two computers were tested, where one only used 1 watt more, are you saying all computers are the same?
Oh i'm sorry i thought the issue wasn't who uses which technology, i thought it was graphical performance, how about this one "Blender 50 to 70% faster on Linux"
Yawwwwwn. You're boring me again. You're barking up a dead tree. Linux can't keep up with Windows 7 on graphics. That's the be all and end all of it. If your "facts" consist of a line of text (you didn't post a source, WOOPS!) and an outdated graphical platform like OpenGL, then I really am SEVERELY disappointed.
Not that I expected much to begin with. The floors are nice and clean after several people have used your face to clean them to a spotless sheen.
@TheUberDeity okay, even I cannot defend GIMP. I know it's a piece of shit. but, how come when I try looking up all the bugs with things you tell me about, I can't get anything. Why not make a website about it? It would be much more worth your time than trolling mac users on Youtube.
Unless of course, you're talking about Macs, in which case you're stuck with a dead-ended, frankensteined bastard-child OS with enough security exploits to write a book on, plus substandard, cheap-ass, bargain-bin outdated hardware and an astronomical price tag.
But wait, there's always "resale value." Definition: "The method upon which one naive Mac customer pawns their dead-ended machine off on another naive Mac customer in order to purchase a new one, thereby repeating the cycle."
Do yourself a favor. Stop talking. The embarrassment level must be horrible for you to endure. I'd hate to see you break and cry when guys like me and Destros kick the snot of you.
That linux guy sounds like ignorant Windows+Linux users who only want upgradability. Linux is good, but is DOES NOT run every piece of software. It's still loaded with a lot of broad driver crap that bloats the OS (not as much as windows though).
I love my linux. I like Macintosh. I use windows as a last resort.
@Ocelot152 hate to bitch buddy but windows just keeps adding code to there old o/s, cause they don't have the ability to build a new o/s from scratch, that why windows bought Novell Linux a few years back, cause they needed to add new stuff to there new o/s and most of the world don't know Linux, so windows can take advantage of that. so think about it, which one faster 20 million lines of code or 5 million and then after all the updates and service packs 40 million. ya ok
Man.. The whole OS war is pointless... I use a Mac, and yet I still love Windows as well, but I just prefer using Mac OS X, it suits my needs more... Just be happy with the OS you have and don't complain about what other people use
It's not a matter of the OS. It's a matter of the hardware. Apple has figured out that starry-eyed tech newbs are willing to get wallet-raped with a smile on their face, then sent home with a computer that will go dead-ass obsolete in 8 months.
I've seen fanboys of all types. I have found Linux fanboys in web development scene that say "fuck WIndows and its poopy .NET" "wanna make a joke website? Make all its webpages have the .aspx extension"
It's funny cause Linux is actually the best.
Jebact 6 days ago
Hahaha! How did dipshit get here!
thedjstig 1 week ago
I want this video on my X810 unit.
ozawablog 2 weeks ago
Your vid is a favorite on Vilnius
atthewburns1229m 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
How to choose an OS:
1. Like to take it up the ass?
Yes? Mac
No? See 2
2. Like to play the latest games?
Yes? PC
No? Linux
sezuor 1 month ago
only hipster fags use a mac, apple has no business being in business.
Jacen436987 1 month ago
Lol nice to see linux being hated. It saves people who can program from dealing with people who know nothing about os' and how computers work. Oh and people will be venerable to attacks, Lol I'm looking at you windows. And Mac but not so glaringly. Windows still is best for gamers. Mac is best for graphics and web design. Linux and unix flavors are for programmers and hackers who know more about computers. To each his own suits.
Systemerror1607 1 month ago
@Systemerror1607
Actually, Windows is better for both. There's absolutely no inherent advantages to using Macs for graphics or web design. Absolutely none. Their hardware is limited in comparison to a PC, their LED displays are pretty, but can't hold up against Dell UltraSharps or NECs running at 2560x1600 with much higher quality. Linux I'll agree with you there. Excellent for infrastructure. Between Win and OSX however, there's simply no comparison.
MaestroDraven 1 month ago
Ya Linux ain't hard it's easy. See for yourself!
Callum2356 3 months ago
@Callum2356 ya. . .. . try xubuntu
3chint 2 months ago in playlist Mac vs PC
Noobs, they know nothing about computers
rafpac6 3 months ago
Linux Rocks
tania2020tania 3 months ago 2
linux aint that nerdy! download the latest ubuntu and see for yourself!
nieknooijens 4 months ago
240p. We meet again...
Wolfen2448 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"MkLinux was the first attempt by Apple to support a free and open source software project." Now OSX's whole kernel is open source the idea of open source they took from Linux.
maw88ify 5 months ago
Linux looks like Josh Radnor
trollface42 5 months ago
@trollface42 linux looks like a rancor.
TrueNuff 5 months ago 3
Oh c'mon Linux fucking RULES!!!!
Dragonmuphin 6 months ago
Hot Swap GPUs? Yea if your comp actually supports newer cards. My $1200 Custom tower doesn't.
TheSecretCobra 6 months ago
@TheSecretCobra should of bought a mac fag, if u cant buy proper hardware. I RUN GENTOO LINUX CLOWN!!
THUSxFAR 6 months ago
@THUSxFAR WOAH! You Troll! I was supporting Macs! Damn I hate Trolls! I have a decent Tower! I didn't Buy wrong Hardware, the Tower is like 3 years old so it's not compatible with the newest cards. Daaaaaaaaaamn, I hate Trolls. BTW I don't use LINUX because I don't, simple as that.
There is no such thing as "Proper Hardware", that is just made up. Second you assume based on little to no information. My Tower is 3 years old, got it from iBuyPower, still works fine.
TheSecretCobra 6 months ago
@TheSecretCobra The thing about trolls - you shouldn't feed them. Let them get disappointed and vanish.
Anyhow, I feel your pain with the too-old-to-upgrade thing. But usually it does work for me, which is one reason I like my PC's. :]
ActionScripter9109 6 months ago
@ActionScripter9109 Yea I know, Haters gonna Hate Trolls gonna Troll. My Computer still works just fine, has about 2 years left b4 it's 100% obsolete. I was playing around with OSX Lion the other day and it works really well, I guarantee that all PC-(Nazi)-Fanboy arguments are all about specs, when there much more than just the flat specs of the system.
TheSecretCobra 6 months ago
@TheSecretCobra Macs are for people that:
don't know how to assemble a computer
don't know how to make a hackintosh
don't know shit about linux
and like to waste money
That's about it.
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD Not Really, Hackintosh builds are limited to specific hardware, I own a custom tower I built myself and a Macbook Air, I don't care about linux because I don't code in C++, I don't waste money as I would rather have the base Macbook Pro/Air instead of my previous $800 HP, that was defective b4 it left china.
TheSecretCobra 4 months ago
@TheSecretCobra you still have yet to say a single advantage to using apple.
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD Pretty sure Macs and Windows or custom based systems have pros and cons. If you have never had extensive experience with both platforms then you cannot understand both. If you want full control over your system and accepting risk then that is your choice, as with my custom system. Apple's hardware is expensive, but you get what you pay for. Both systems can co-exists, and I really am tired of these fan-boy arguments that consist of nothing more than ignorant, Blind Hate
TheSecretCobra 4 months ago
@TheSecretCobra you still have yet to actually give any factual evidence. I can deduce whether or not a linux distro is worth noting based on what it entails. You, like every single mac fan-boy, are still hiding behind your "you need to try it" veil. If you want a simplistic OS that is hardly compatible with anything use ubunto, if you want something more complex and versatile use arch. OSX however is overpriced and is configurable in hardly any respects.
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD lol, not a mac fan-boy, you need to stop trolling. You realize that Open GL is a Superior platform. OSX is a great OS, the OS is not overpriced it's $30 per upgrade. Macs, and Mac Hardware is not overpriced, it's proprietary so it's more expensive. Overpriced refers to something exactly the same but priced higher. I can run SC2 on a Mac, but if I want to run Unreal3 theres a problem right? Wrong, BootCamp is 100% Free and runs windows just fine.
TheSecretCobra 4 months ago
@TheSecretCobra You can create a hackintosh for less than a mac that runs exactly the same. Even if some hardware is restricted it is still fully possible to do it for far less.
As for your mom being unable to utilize a simple machine ubuntu would work fine, and Windows7 isn't rocket science. What is she doing anyway? checking her e-mail and using MS word?
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD Ok You do realize that the hardware of the system determines it's capabilities. Hackintosh builds only work with specific and sometimes inferior hardware. An iMac with a 4-core-i7 is better than a Hackintosh with a core2duo. Also my mother is very tech savvy and has used windows for years. She wants something rock-solid that is more stable. For her simplicity is what she wants as do I with a laptop. You are just ignorant and obviously have nothing more than hate to offer
TheSecretCobra 4 months ago
@TheSecretCobra
The fact of the matter is that I could build a hackintosh for cheaper than an imac with better hardware. And if she's tech savvy in the least she'll understand that ubuntu is much more simple and reliable and stable than OSX.
ad-hominem ad-hominem
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
@TheSecretCobra again where is your info sourced from that Windows is as unstable as you make it out to be?
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD When it comes to my custom tower, or another computer for a specific task or reason, I want full control over the build. For someone like my mom who doesn't, an iMac would suit her great. A Macbook Air has great performance, can dual-boot windows 7, and is great on the go. The specs are fine for the unit. When was the last time you have seen a laptop with 100% customization anyway? You are trying to compare different philosophic ideas in computing.
TheSecretCobra 4 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD You strike me as a PC-NAZI-FANBOY, spuing Blind Hate about something you obviously no nothing about. I am not a fan-boy, more of a neutral party who looks at pros and cons rather than automatically favoring 1 side over the other.
TheSecretCobra 4 months ago
@TheSecretCobra You still haven't given a single reason why mac is good at all and that is why I am classifying you as a mac fanboy, because just like them you fail to give a single reason as to why apple is a good company or why their products are at all good.
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
@SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD The Macbook Air will boot in 12-15 seconds. Macs are more reliable. OSX is more stable than windows. It is cheaper to upgrade OSX. Better customer support. Virtually no Fail-Rate for systems. Just because models are updated deos not make previous ones obsolete. I have friends that have working PowerMac G4 that are just fine, my Pentium 4 crapped out years ago. I could go on but I am getting tier of feeding trolls. I feel like I am running a Zoo lately.
TheSecretCobra 4 months ago
@TheSecretCobra Where are you sourcing your info that macs are more reliable and more stable than windows? It isn't cheaper to upgrade OSX because OSX is the only OS that requires money to update. And I never said anything about outdated models, but the fact that they're selling outdated hardware for more money than newer hardware is absurd.
SuperFREEXBOXLIVECOD 4 months ago
copy
multidani98 7 months ago
Hey don't talk shit about Linux. It keeps my ass nice and clean after a good shit.
marcuschookt 8 months ago
PC is not even an operating system. How can you compare pc's with mac and linux wich is both operating systems and linux can run on both of them.
manar20001115 8 months ago
GEE-ZUS
pat20105 8 months ago
is it just me or does linux have a boner?
MrKillertube 8 months ago 8
@MrKillertube the "D" in KDE stands for dicks.
TrueNuff 8 months ago 9
When was the last time my PC froze?
LOLZpersonok 9 months ago
BEST LINE EVAR
When did dipshit get here?
mathwizi2005 9 months ago
and funny as shit..as the mac guy in this video ends up with the child molester * thank all that is sane that fag is dead* 's one glove thing going on.LOL. and yeah..MY first pc a Dell 100d smartstep.did RARELY suffer from a driver crashing in xp 32 bit. since thing ( more than 10 years ago..) i've custom built my own pc's and NEVER had a problem unless I was learning something through trail and error like the first time i tried overclocking.
chronofusion 9 months ago
Where's your sandybridge Mac?
sirrington 9 months ago
i dont care how Linux looks like in these vids, its still funny xDD
91jmda 10 months ago 16
@91jmda stop checking out his tightly compressed .tar.gz package.
TrueNuff 10 months ago 43
@TrueNuff gunzip package, tar xf package, ./package XXXXD
ChristX1337 9 months ago
lulz.
PC and MAC left Linux alone.
FilMarck 10 months ago
A good scene would be one where PC breaks his pencil. He just takes his pencil from his pocket, throws it away, gets a new one and puts it in his pocket.
The Mac would also have a broken pencil, but it would be glued to hit jacket, which are glued to his pants, which in turn are glued to his shoes with socks glued-on. He'd change all of his clothes and pay a lot of money :D
Daputti 10 months ago 3
Only idiots don't know how to get proper drivers
anon7320 10 months ago
@anon7320 dont forget you just like everyone else was once a COMPUTER NOOB. meaning you didn't know shit about how to search for things, including update drivers for your hardware. thus only IDIOTS forget to be humble enough to THINK about what (want-to-be) constructive criticism they want to give and instead give a random, pointless, assuming insult to the general crowd. wow I think i know who's done that before. EVERY PRESIDENT OF THE divided states of america. Barry Soetoro now included
chronofusion 9 months ago
@chronofusion You have to be pretty silly to not know how to get proper drivers. I've always gotten the right drivers even back when using '98 when I was 7. These days it's ridiculously easy. What's the problem? A little google search too tough? Not insulting the general crowd, just people that constantly need to be spoon fed everything, and when it's given to them, they still can't figure it out. Oh well, more work for us. And I couldn't give two shits about the u s of a. HAVE A NICE DAY!! =D
anon7320 9 months ago
@anon7320 NERD!
1wildturk1 8 months ago
@1wildturk1 lol and you're a turk :P
anon7320 8 months ago
when did dipshit get here?
ReloadedKaarelpoiss 11 months ago
The glove just proved MAC is gay
f3l0ny33 11 months ago 77
@f3l0ny33 How old were you, 12?
Xaeleep 3 months ago
plug 'n' play...how did they know my street name?
dorydaparrot 11 months ago
who wants 2 run windows xp on n mac when u can just get windows 7 64-bit?!
128shaan 11 months ago
Why is Linux always a nerd? >.> is there a video that shows Linux as a cool person?! >..> (proud user of Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS)
91jmda 11 months ago
@91jmda Nope. It's a good OS, just a little... nerdy.
Theevilonemwhaha 11 months ago
@Theevilonemwhaha Linux isn't nerdy, have you tried an OS called FreeBSD? now THAT'S nerdy
91jmda 11 months ago
@91jmda can't say i have. I'll take a look
Theevilonemwhaha 11 months ago
@91jmda because while you were learning how to use linux, everyone else was getting laid.
TurKdiRty 11 months ago
@TurKdiRty I already got laid dipshit
91jmda 11 months ago
@91jmda
lol nice one :P
georgethelebwog 11 months ago
mac can't put on a glove
ZuKahta 1 year ago
Linux is finnish! YAY
ThePullaMies 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Try Naughty women and success your life benaughtyman.info
jayaniperera 1 year ago
where's dos in this
I know it's old but it started computers.
I say they should have some really old dude in a wheel chair be dos and start bragging about history of like "when I was young" crap like that.
Then one of them should point out that you have to use an emulator to use dox anymore, then have mac say that you have to use that same emulator to run windows 1,2, and 3.
I think it would be funny
for those who don't know the dos emulator is called "dosbox".
have a good one.
hobocamptheater 1 year ago 2
you can upgrade a mac pro
EmoticonMayhem 1 year ago
@EmoticonMayhem and it still sux
metalmathias53498 1 year ago
@EmoticonMayhem So spending a shit load fixes it
DaFakaMatt 1 year ago
you can upgrade laptops its just harder and youll probably need someone prifessional
GoodOlDavid 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm drunk so fuck you all
jaymezavirus 1 year ago
but you cant upgrade a laptop's graphics card because nobody sells laptop graphics cards as I have learned trying to upgrade my m17x :(
better off just going with apple laptop
1Pantikian 1 year ago
@1Pantikian
upgradeable computers = desktop computers
Laptops are designed to fit only the things they are designed for.
chaklong 1 year ago
@1Pantikian Yes, going with a mac that plays what games? Oh yeah they don't play games, and YES you can buy graphics cards i'm 11 years old and i know more than you. Go online you can find A ton of graphics card. But I don't care you can go but a Apple Mac Book (Crap Book). Who agrees with me?
FSXUSER10 1 year ago 2
@FSXUSER10 lol, youre 11. i have been looking for laptop graphics cards (there is a difference), and no, you cannot buy laptop graphics cards, not even from the graphics card companies. You can look for them on ebay but in order for someone to be selling on they would have to take it out of their own laptop and currently not many people are doing that.
1Pantikian 1 year ago
0:00
michaelbo121 1 year ago
Linux has an AK-47 in his backpack and is only acting like a doofus. :D
HartuBeatu 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
3,263 people are too stupid to realize that Macintosh is a Unix variant.
deusprogrammer 1 year ago 2
someone's jealous of Linux's apparent superiority
jaymezavirus 1 year ago
@jaymezavirus wut I am not in to math keep it away from me
porkyminch01 1 year ago
@porkyminch01 lol
jaymezavirus 1 year ago
@jaymezavirus fucking pinguy and ubuntu does not work on the hp mini 1000, 60% of the drivers do not work out of the box and probably will never be resolved, both work great on the aspire one, so I could blame HP.
porkyminch01 1 year ago
Yeah I hate upgrading as well, I'd much rather buy an entire new computer that is the most expensive on the market
nielso212 1 year ago
linux!
FleurVlog 1 year ago
Boy, these kids today. They gotta' start listening to their elders.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
Ahhh yes, the "Same article" he was referring to, the one I posted.
"ThinkPad T61 with Ubuntu 10.04 LTS was consuming 14% more power than Windows 7, but when both were loaded with NVIDIA's binary driver that leverages PowerMizer and other power-savings techniques, Ubuntu 10.04 LTS averaged to consume just 4% more power."
- Which means......AGAIN.......that an OS that requires HALF the system resources of Windows 7 STILL sucked more 4%-14% MORE power than Windows 7.
Instant annihilation AGAIN!
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity "...system resources...."
You make the lower system requirements sound like a bad thing. System requirements have little impact on power consumption. Unfortunately drivers often play a bigger role here though Windows itself has pretty good power management capabilities. Do the lower requirements of Ubuntu mean Windows 7 was "instantly annihilated"? That said, you realize 4% of roughly 3 hours (not sure on what the total battery life is of the T61) is only 7.2 minutes right?
LordDestros 1 year ago
@LordDestros Not to mention those results were only for two computers (for which each had vastly different results) and only while the OS's were in their idle states.
Google's Chrome OS is also linux based and geek . com found that with the Cr-48 it lasted roughly 8 hours with Quote "5 hours of Hulu videos, roughly an hour of streaming music, and intermittent browsing" so uber is wrong when he says linux, what he should be saying is ubuntu, as linux is obviously more than just ubuntu.
benjy288 1 year ago
benjy288: ""there is not a huge difference in performance between Microsoft Windows 7 Professional and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS."
- What the idiot forgot to mention is that Linux requires ohhhhhh, half the resources of Windows 7? Isn't that the Linux-fanboy argument? And the best it could muster was "not a huge difference?"
Hahahahahahahahahaha!! It's SO EASY sometimes! Jesus!
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity Source "AMD's 12-core Magny-Cours Opteron 6174 vs. Intel's 6-core Xeon"
Source "phoronx is Windows 7 Actually Faster Than Ubuntu 10.04?" "What these results do show is that Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" is very capable of being a comparable gaming platform to Microsoft Windows at least as far as the quantitative performance is concerned"
Can't keep up on graphics you say?
benjy288 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@benjy288
You lost. AGAIN.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@benjy288
You lost. AGAIN.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
Double-whammy today. An old-school UberDeity victim and a fresh new face that I just turned into hamburger.
And gee, it's not even Wednesday!
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
Source: Phoronix
Ubuntu 10.04
May 4, 2010
Article Title: Ubuntu 10.04 Is More Power Hungry Than Windows 7
Author: Michael Larabel
With bar graphs to prove it.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
LINUX THE BEST ;D
borytho1 1 year ago
@Ocelot152 more code? that doesn't mean crap. Snow Leopard is much better than Windows 7, simpler, can run just about anything you want, and has 9-14 LESS GB than Windows. those 20-40 million codes you're talking about, is just stuff of drivers (getting, installing, using), not actually native tasks. Mac can leave out all that bull crap.
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo
Ummm, no, it can't. Software versatility is one of the biggest hangups of SL. That's why Apple thanks their lucky stars every night that Microsoft, in their GENEROSITY, allowed Apple to run Windows via Bootcamp.
Actually, a full-fledged Snow Leopard install is around 13GB. A full-fledged Windows 7 install is about 16GB.
Finally, CNET showed Windows 7 kicking the living snot out of Snow Leopard....on a Macbook Pro, no less. Woops!! Guess Snow Leopard ISN'T better than Windows
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity Full fledged install of snowleopard includes an extra dozen or so gigabytes of software. Windows 7, you get IE and a trial of office. That's pretty much. . . nothing.
And its funny how everybody thinks a "faster" computer is automatically better. Not the case. In terms of performance, I'd love to see one windows 7 machine in real life go a few days without slowing down. My brother's over powered hard wired Win7 computer slows down if he doesn't reboot/reset every day.
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo
"Full fledged install of snowleopard includes an extra dozen or so gigabytes of software."
Great, more software for me to remove?
"Windows 7, you get IE and a trial of office. That's pretty much. . . nothing."
Windows 7 doesn't come with a trial of Office....
LordDestros 1 year ago
@LordDestros OSx does come with some great software. Since you're already paying for the software, it's not free, but it does make the value of the operating system go up substantially. Honestly, mac is geared for specific tasks and those specific tasks it does great. An example would be music recording with Garage Band. It does everything Pro Tools does, and it comes with OSx. Another example is Adobe's Creative Suite.
Anyway, just try to keep an open mind about mac. They're not that terrible.
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline "... value of the operating...."
But many people do not need such software included with iLife or already have superior programs. Others may find Windows Live or other free programs to be more than sufficient for their needs. These people see no benefit from having it.
How Adobe CS an example? It is multi-platform and isn't free with Mac OS X.
"They're not that terrible."
I don't believe their terrible but rather are overpriced and as a result are worse than many other PCs.
LordDestros 1 year ago
@LordDestros I wasn't speaking for all people, as though all people should use OSx, and that OSx is best for everyone. Please do not make assumptions.
Adobe CS is an example of a piece of software which the mac is geared for. I stated so very plainly in my comment. I never suggested that it was free with OSx, nor did I state that it was only for the mac. Your reading comprehension ability is a bit lacking, or you are too impatient when you read a person's words.
Mac is great for specific tasks
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline
My point is value is subjective. Some people see it as an added value whereas others see it as an inconvenience. I understand you weren't speaking of it as superior for all people.
Regarding Adobe CS: And I still don't see what you mean. You aren't explaining how Macs are any better for Adobe CS than non-Mac PCs. E.g. CS4 was an example of a program that clearly performed worse on Mac OS X than on Windows. It's as if I claim Windows is geared for Safari. What does that even mean?
LordDestros 1 year ago
@LordDestros It is widely known and accepted among professional designers that Adobe products (dreamweaver, photoshop, fireworks, flash, etc..) have next to no chance of crashing on a mac as opposed to a windows machine. This is why most professional designers use mac as opposed to windows. You'll also find this in the music industry.
In all other industries, you'll find Windows far superior with far more market share (except for professional servers, these use AIX or a Unix/Linux distro).
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline "It is widely known and accepted among professional designers...."
And I disagree. Adobe applications specifically tend to favor Windows in general over Mac OS X. Hence the reasons Windows received native/optimized x64 binaries first as well as the reason Apple hates Flash. Further many designers often use Windows for various Windows-specific software such as 3DS Studio Max or Linux for animation/rendering.
LordDestros 1 year ago
@LordDestros And how many designers have you worked with professionally? Do you work in the industry as I do? I didn't even originally comment to argue, just to let you know that mac is widely used for designers and sound engineers. It is factual and I am sorry if it bothers you. Take care.
mhaneline 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mhaneline "...just to let you know that mac is widely used for designers and sound engineers."
And I'm not debating that; you're previous comments don't reflect this statement. Stating "Adobe CS is an example of a piece of software which the mac is geared for" or that such programs have "have next to no chance of crashing on a mac as opposed to a windows machine" is simply untrue as far as I'm concerned. If you want I can post links to crash logs as examples.
LordDestros 1 year ago
@mhaneline
Widely accepted? And you have proof of this? Sources to back this up? Reputable sources, I might add...not your basement-dwelling wannabe vector graphic artist.
Even Adobe openly admitted that their products ALWAYS run better on PC, not Mac. Here's a tip. Being a designer or a music producer does N-O-T make you a computer expert in any way, shape or form in any reality. Period. They're overpriced, underpowered, terribly exploitable, and outdated.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity I am a fortune 500 software architect, not a "basement-dwelling wannabe vector graphic artist".
Insulting someone is the best way to end a conversation, and this conversation is over.
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline
No, you're not :) But thanks for the laugh. Oh, I'm the president of Ferrari. No, REALLY!!
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity It looks as though we are the same age. Why do we not both act the same age? I think that you would do well to take a step back and ask yourself why you are conversing on the internet. What are your goals? If your goal is simply to insult people, I would seriously urge you to rethink your moral standard.
Not that I am obliged to provide evidence, but I specialize in load-balanced parallel process transaction-based applications supporting thousands of concurrent connections.
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline
So what you've basically said is that you come here to formulate opinions, instead of quoting sources.
Thanks! I just wanted to clarify. Next time don't drop a comment like "It's a well known fact that...." without actually having......y'know.....facts to back it up. Me? I've already got one up on you, and it's a pretty simple one. I'm still waiting for you to come up with counter-evidence instead of saying "I do this n' that," which means sweet fanny ass in the long run.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity No. I read your smug comments and thought to myself "Here is a person who has a very biased opinion on a subject which I feel I have more experience in. Perhaps I can share my experiences, as far as the industry I work in is concerned, and help him see things from a different perspective".
After conversing with you a bit, I have come to the realization that you, for whatever reason, do not act your age or conduct yourself in a respectful manor. Not a man of intellect, but spite.
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline
Spoken PRECISELY like a guy who just got exposed for being a know-nothing moron who decided to do exactly as I said: post opinions, not facts.
You're doing very little to help your case here. When I start beating people in arguments, they tend to deflect the issue by attacking my character.
Here's a hint: It doesn't work.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity I'm choosing to ignore your first statement as an immature tirade. Please do try to act your age, you are a grown man.
Now then, if you were to tell me that a certain machine sold better than another (I see that you are a salesman), that it was a matter of fact in your industry, as a rational adult, I would take you for your word. If I were an immature dolt, I might demand proof and go off on a tangent such as you have below. It's a good thing that I am not an immature dolt.
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline
This coming from the guy who says "the fact is....." without providing any concrete evidence, which is precisely what this argument (ie: killing) is all about.
Please, run along, child. You can't compete with me no matter how hard you try. Now you're just wasting my time, and you aren't privileged enough for that.
Still waiting on those sources, squirt!
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity I see that it is too much to ask for you to act your age. Understood. I wonder if your boss or peers would have a shred of respect for you if they knew this is how you conduct yourself off-hours.
It is not my responsibility to prove anything to you. The top design firms around the world design on macs using adobe software. That you don't know this is, in and of itself, enough proof to show your lack of knowledge on the topic. You can throw an immature tantrum all you want though.
mhaneline 1 year ago
@mhaneline
Actually.....son, I am the Boss :) I'm a University-educated Photonic Engineer who builds industrial laser machines for a living....from scratch, and exports all over the world.
The "top design firms" aren't computer-savvy. Very few companies are. Try not to confuse "designer" with "computer expert," hmmm? You're embarrassing yourself something awful. On my channel is a comparison of the 12-Core Mac Pro vs. a custom-built PC.
Weep in utter shame as you read it.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity Ignoring yet another immature attack. Can you please stop with them? It's pointless.
I don't think many people would dispute the fact that adobe software is faster on windows than mac. What designers are concerned about is the operating system having a memory or IO fault. When it comes to design, people trust mac not to crash on them just like people such as myself trust operating systems like AIX to run mission-critical applications and databases instead of windows server.
mhaneline 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo
There's no Office free trial. FAILURE #1.
See a Windows 7 machine go a few days without slowing down? I've got....count em......FIFTEEN computers running Windows 7 both at home, on my laptops, and at work, with ZERO slowdown, and they've been running W7 for the last 16 months.
FAILURE #2.
Your "brothers" computer (I doubt he has one) is either a piece of shit, or your brother is such a tech-illiterate moron that he actually made an effort to fuck up Windows 7.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity Right. . . because my brother only taught me almost everything I know about windows. I'm not talking younger brother. I'm talking older. Dude, yo sound like you just think you know EVERYTHING about computers just because you know windows. Give yourself a break and learn everything. I don't get my information from a few little sources. I learn everywhere.
And, many OEM and clean installs come with trials of crapware. Ufail
@lamethelaw I'm using linux right now. LOLZ!!!
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo
My little friend, I regularly run Ubuntu, Mint, OpenSUSE, and Snow Leopard on my machine for continuous testing and education purposes. Your last comments made an IDIOT out of you, and LordDestros and I proved it.
There IS no Office Free trial, despite the silliness you posted in your comment that baffled everyone with your utter buffoonery. You know N-O-T-H-I-N-G about Windows, computers, or OS's in general.
I however, do. Case closed.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity Right, and I'm not learning? I am learning. I constantly look up everything I can to figure out what I can do. I have succesfully gotten USB drives to boot off of every PC I've come in contact with. But that's not even a percent of what I've gotten to know. If you're so great, why don't you prove yourself by building a version of windows that ACTUALLY WORKS.
And that Office free trials is what happened to me every time. fuck that. Open Office FTW.
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo
Yeah, OpenOffice :) Hahahahaha! Try constructing a PowerPoint presentation for a large company in OO, put it on a USB stick, come to work, and then load it up onto an actual PowerPoint program from MS Office.
It'll be a fucking disaster. I've tried. OO might be free, but there's almost always a catch with open sourced stuff.
Proven quite easily by the long list of 64-Bit Linux bugs that currently plague the latest distros.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity "It'll be a fucking disaster. I've tried."
I've had the same issue with simply using varying versions of MSO PowerPoint (Office 2008 -> 2007, 2007 -> 2003, 2003 -> 2000) at times so that issue isn't unique to Open Office.
LordDestros 1 year ago
@LordDestros
I'm not talking about that at all. I'm talking about building a PowerPoint presentation in OpenOffice and then opening it up with Office Powerpoint. Linux Mint refers to OO as "a near-drop in replacement for Microsoft Office," which clearly it is not.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity And my point is even Microsoft Office PowerPoint can't open Microsoft Office PowerPoint files correctly at all times. In either case, my own preferred Office suite would probably be Lotus Symphony after MSO '10.
LordDestros 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity You can say it's a child-os all you want. It still doesn't change the fact that Windows is also trying to be a hold-your-hand OS along with them. MS office seems bloated with visual features. OpenOffice in my experience works faster, better, and doesn't have that visual bloat. And, if Mac OS has so many security issues (and is used in almost any workplace), why aren't hackers all up on them to take down companies and other crap like that. Don't blame it on low marketshare!
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo
So the next time you bash an OS that you just can't grasp, you might want to look at YOUR OS of choice. Not only is Linux chock-full of bugs, but the graphical performance is subpar (despite having almost half the necessary system requirements) it has a power consumption rate 48% bigger than that of Windows (run it on a laptop, I dare you), and you're stuck with broom-closet drivers and third-rate open-source knockoffs of better programs.
GIMP can't beat Photoshop. Dream on.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity I will quote you on this one "And you have proof of this? Sources to back this up? Reputable sources"
Regarding your comment on "Not only is Linux chock-full of bugs, but the graphical performance is subpar (despite having almost half the necessary system requirements) it has a power consumption rate 48% bigger than that of Windows (run it on a laptop, I dare you), and you're stuck with broom-closet drivers and third-rate open-source knockoffs of better programs"
benjy288 1 year ago
@benjy288
Actually, I got all those facts from xyz, who has coincidentally posted factual URLs to every single one of those things.
You know, the guy who has been beating your ass to death for weeks after I got tired of you.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@benjy288
Oh geez! I goofed :) Remember how you're always saying that I never admit when I'm wrong? Well, that ain't true. Turns out I was wrong about Linux consuming 48% more power than Windows 7.
It's actually 56% more power. D'oh! Do I ever feel silly :)
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity Yes i thought you would say that, which only proves how dumb you truly are,
"The results from this OpenGL game testing are similar to that of our workstation results earlier this month: for the most part, there is not a huge difference in performance between Microsoft Windows 7 Professional and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS." you said sub-par graphical performance?
And ubuntu 10.04 used 1 watt more power on a Lenovo ThinkPad T61 in idle state only, you said "run it on a laptop, I dare you".
benjy288 1 year ago
@benjy288
Damn!! What a shame that nobody except Linux is using OpenGL these days! Even the OpenGL community and every single developer dropped support for the platform!
This is 2010, kiddo, not 2003. Time to buy a watch.
I just quoted a source for power consumption which MURDERS you (again). I'm not the Linux-hater anyways. xyz is, and I'll let him continue to beat your ass every single day, in and out. You're a time waster. I just walked by to slap you in the face :)
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity And i quoted the same source for power consumption, and you are aware that only two computers were tested, where one only used 1 watt more, are you saying all computers are the same?
Oh i'm sorry i thought the issue wasn't who uses which technology, i thought it was graphical performance, how about this one "Blender 50 to 70% faster on Linux"
benjy288 1 year ago
@benjy288
Yawwwwwn. You're boring me again. You're barking up a dead tree. Linux can't keep up with Windows 7 on graphics. That's the be all and end all of it. If your "facts" consist of a line of text (you didn't post a source, WOOPS!) and an outdated graphical platform like OpenGL, then I really am SEVERELY disappointed.
Not that I expected much to begin with. The floors are nice and clean after several people have used your face to clean them to a spotless sheen.
G'bye!
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity okay, even I cannot defend GIMP. I know it's a piece of shit. but, how come when I try looking up all the bugs with things you tell me about, I can't get anything. Why not make a website about it? It would be much more worth your time than trolling mac users on Youtube.
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
Unless of course, you're talking about Macs, in which case you're stuck with a dead-ended, frankensteined bastard-child OS with enough security exploits to write a book on, plus substandard, cheap-ass, bargain-bin outdated hardware and an astronomical price tag.
But wait, there's always "resale value." Definition: "The method upon which one naive Mac customer pawns their dead-ended machine off on another naive Mac customer in order to purchase a new one, thereby repeating the cycle."
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo
Do yourself a favor. Stop talking. The embarrassment level must be horrible for you to endure. I'd hate to see you break and cry when guys like me and Destros kick the snot of you.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
That linux guy sounds like ignorant Windows+Linux users who only want upgradability. Linux is good, but is DOES NOT run every piece of software. It's still loaded with a lot of broad driver crap that bloats the OS (not as much as windows though).
I love my linux. I like Macintosh. I use windows as a last resort.
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
@Ocelot152 hate to bitch buddy but windows just keeps adding code to there old o/s, cause they don't have the ability to build a new o/s from scratch, that why windows bought Novell Linux a few years back, cause they needed to add new stuff to there new o/s and most of the world don't know Linux, so windows can take advantage of that. so think about it, which one faster 20 million lines of code or 5 million and then after all the updates and service packs 40 million. ya ok
bushuasseh 1 year ago
I think Linux wins
Edge0fPain 1 year ago
"Plug and Play, how'd they know my street name"
Interesting joke. xD
DestinySeraphim 1 year ago
am I the only one who appreciates both macs and PCs?
TheEllkaytee 1 year ago
Linux user and still proud of it :) Doing the right thing unfortunately doesn't necessarily make you look cool
apomk2 1 year ago
ha, linux sucks.
smeadog2010 1 year ago
(shakes head) What a pointless, stupid reply, phenom.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
I hate that NOBODY knows that Macs have BOOTCAMP that allows Mac to run WINDOWS...
phenom910 1 year ago
@phenom910
Yeah, and it just happens to run Mac hardware BETTER than Snow Leopard does. CNET ran the test .
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity While that may be true, I still like Snow Leopard better :3
phenom910 1 year ago
@phenom910
That's your choice entirely. Just saying.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@TheUberDeity *Correction* Just Saiyan.
phenom910 1 year ago
i wish i had the money to buy a mac, just to buy a hi-end PC!
Ha!
katarn109 1 year ago 40
@katarn109
:D And I wish I had the money to build a high end Intel rig... So I could buy two AMD rigs and share their processing power.... Bang4buck ftw lol
Edge0fPain 1 year ago
@katarn109 so true :)
mechaart 1 year ago
@katarn109 agree.
Qaosbringer 1 year ago
Man.. The whole OS war is pointless... I use a Mac, and yet I still love Windows as well, but I just prefer using Mac OS X, it suits my needs more... Just be happy with the OS you have and don't complain about what other people use
DudeofWonders123 1 year ago
@DudeofWonders123
It's not a matter of the OS. It's a matter of the hardware. Apple has figured out that starry-eyed tech newbs are willing to get wallet-raped with a smile on their face, then sent home with a computer that will go dead-ass obsolete in 8 months.
TheUberDeity 1 year ago
@DudeofWonders123 Macs=scaM :P
htainlintha 1 year ago
@htainlintha Lmao, I just noticed that, that's a good one haha ^^
I agree with you in some ways, they are a bit too pricey... But I think it was worth my money in some ways ^^
DudeofWonders123 1 year ago
The linux guy reminds me of this really annoying kid at my school.
dipshits.
twotailedavenger 1 year ago
I've seen fanboys of all types. I have found Linux fanboys in web development scene that say "fuck WIndows and its poopy .NET" "wanna make a joke website? Make all its webpages have the .aspx extension"
ccricers 1 year ago
i hate macfags they make me raaaaageeeee!!!!
OMGnubcakes 1 year ago
@OMGnubcakes
Personally I find them excellent entertainment value! The trouble is, they get boring quickly, so I find I'm frequently discarding them for new ones.