I have a friend who was on the set when this was being filmed. He said Neil was a big time prima donna but said Buzz was cool. Little known trivia: Neil And Buzz did all of the lunar scenes for all 5 Apollo "lunar landings". They dubbed the different astronaut's voices over the video for the other four Apollos later at Houston.
Yes ofcourse John, and the tsunami was organized by NOAA, the 9/11 by NSA and everything else you distrust is organized by any government in any country.
From this vid it is clear that at many points the sand/dust thrown up by the wheels STOPS suddenly in mid-flight, is motionless, stays in the same position, and then falls.
As the Moon's surface is in a vacuum, only the braking effect of an atmosphere can do this. The lunar rover is in an atmosphere and NOT on the Moon, and, thus, the Apollo missions were fraudulent.
'STOPS suddenly in mid-flight, is motionless, stays in the same position, and then falls.'
What IS clear, is that you have ZERO knowledge concerning the topic you comment on. Take a couple of years of physics so you don:t sound like a moron next time.
This proves the moon landings were faked because that stupit dune buggy couldn't possibly carry enough gas to go to the moon and back and it's tires wouldn't have any traction in outer space, how dumb do they think we are?
Don't sweat it. Most of these vids are put up by people that just hate the U.S. government so much they will believe anything that supports that hate. Mostly Generation Y punks that were not around for the actual event and think that YouTube and Google will give them a better education than college. Many of them are the same fools who think that 9/11 was an inside job. Those who lived the experience know that the Apollo program was one mankind's greatest achievements.
The trajectory of individual particles of dust is parabolic, save for inter-particulate collisions. Of course, the overall effect doesn't always appear parabolic since the particles are strewn at different angles, and the field of view is not always orthogonal to the plane of the trajectories. If there was atmosphere, the dust would not be falling so neatly (it would diffuse through the air and make huge clouds).... The only force acting on the moving dust is mg.
"Of course, the overall effect doesn't always appear parabolic since the particles are strewn at different angles, and the field of view is not always orthogonal to the plane of the trajectories."
But,You are claiming "the trajectory of individual particles of dust is parabolic."
I cannot see their trajectories are parabolic.
They are dropping from the top of trajectory with steep angle.
it's going to be nice if you can provide details of your calculation. for example, the assumptions that you made regarding the value of some of the key physical variables, like rotational velocity of the wheels & the initial velocity of the dust upon being kicked up by the wheels. thanks
This vid went viral on Naypyidaw
eweykidd13d 1 month ago
This video went viral on Bangui
kirbymelton23 1 month ago
.Moon hoaxers: Its funny watching amateur physicists trying to do physics. Try finishing your GED first.
fortknoxguy 4 months ago
only just thought of this the moon lander was only just big enough for the astronauts to fit in WHERE THE FUCK WAS THE MOON ROVER KEPT lol pure BS
dhudson369 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@dhudson369
'WHERE THE FUCK WAS THE MOON ROVER KEPT lol pure BS'
A simple google search provides the answer, but appearently YOU don't mind coming accross as an uneducated fool.
Monkeyboysdontknow 11 months ago
US Disintegration By 2010 Predicts Russian prof. IGOR PANARIN
youtube vid: watch?v=zi8-0QtCaTg
studio054jock 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@studio054jock
'US Disintegration By 2010 Predicts Russian prof. IGOR PANARIN'
Didn't get THAT one right either. Imagine my surprise...
P.S. For you idiots that can't figure out the simplest of things (and by all the MHB posts, there are a significant number of you) that was SARCASM!
Monkeyboysdontknow 11 months ago
I have a friend who was on the set when this was being filmed. He said Neil was a big time prima donna but said Buzz was cool. Little known trivia: Neil And Buzz did all of the lunar scenes for all 5 Apollo "lunar landings". They dubbed the different astronaut's voices over the video for the other four Apollos later at Houston.
zefallafez 2 years ago
Conspiracy Idiots Alliance (CIA).
dopje31857 3 years ago
Yes ofcourse John, and the tsunami was organized by NOAA, the 9/11 by NSA and everything else you distrust is organized by any government in any country.
Are you a CIA-member?
dopje31857 3 years ago
Bullshit, this was filmed at Area 51, and played, to the public at half speed(slow motion)!
johncopey 3 years ago
johncopey, if it was filmed on Earth, we would expect to see cloud of dust due to the air resistance ( watch?v=fnO-bpjFu4A ).
What is now your theory about that?
GrifOli 3 years ago
We run dune buggies in sand all the time and NO dust cloud like you claim. You Liar. Get a life you loser hoax retard.
timrocket2008 2 years ago
timrocket, you are telling me that the lunar rover is running on sand ?
Tell me, can sand keep a beautiful bootprint shape like this one on Earth: AS11-40-5877
No, so you must admit that this is dust (or dirt). Thus, you must see cloud of dust.
GrifOli 2 years ago
From this vid it is clear that at many points the sand/dust thrown up by the wheels STOPS suddenly in mid-flight, is motionless, stays in the same position, and then falls.
As the Moon's surface is in a vacuum, only the braking effect of an atmosphere can do this. The lunar rover is in an atmosphere and NOT on the Moon, and, thus, the Apollo missions were fraudulent.
sergemck 3 years ago
@sergemck you sir are a retard. we call it gravity, and it exists on the moon too and doesn't require an atmosphere.
Mooocow1231 11 months ago
@sergemck
'STOPS suddenly in mid-flight, is motionless, stays in the same position, and then falls.'
What IS clear, is that you have ZERO knowledge concerning the topic you comment on. Take a couple of years of physics so you don:t sound like a moron next time.
Monkeyboysdontknow 11 months ago
This proves the moon landings were faked because that stupit dune buggy couldn't possibly carry enough gas to go to the moon and back and it's tires wouldn't have any traction in outer space, how dumb do they think we are?
barflewk 3 years ago
The rover clips PROVE beyond a shadow of a doubt that the lunar landings took place. I just can't believe these retarded CTs...
lucid6 3 years ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
Don't sweat it. Most of these vids are put up by people that just hate the U.S. government so much they will believe anything that supports that hate. Mostly Generation Y punks that were not around for the actual event and think that YouTube and Google will give them a better education than college. Many of them are the same fools who think that 9/11 was an inside job. Those who lived the experience know that the Apollo program was one mankind's greatest achievements.
Synthetrix 3 years ago
Seriously, how can people doubt the moon landing?
Next thing you know, gravity will be a hoax created by the government.
r31ncarnat3d 3 years ago
The sand trajectory does not describe a parabola.
It is affected by the air resistance while it flies .
tkrWkLNsQk 3 years ago
...because there was a whole lot of air on the moon. Right?
egosupermansam 3 years ago
"...because there was a whole lot of air on the moon. Right?".
No, we are knowing there is not atmosphere on the Moon from the observation , refraction of the stars to pass through near the surface of the moon .
tkrWkLNsQk 3 years ago
The trajectory of individual particles of dust is parabolic, save for inter-particulate collisions. Of course, the overall effect doesn't always appear parabolic since the particles are strewn at different angles, and the field of view is not always orthogonal to the plane of the trajectories. If there was atmosphere, the dust would not be falling so neatly (it would diffuse through the air and make huge clouds).... The only force acting on the moving dust is mg.
lucid6 3 years ago
"Of course, the overall effect doesn't always appear parabolic since the particles are strewn at different angles, and the field of view is not always orthogonal to the plane of the trajectories."
But,You are claiming "the trajectory of individual particles of dust is parabolic."
I cannot see their trajectories are parabolic.
They are dropping from the top of trajectory with steep angle.
tkrWkLNsQk 3 years ago
"I cannot see their trajectories are parabolic."
You also can't see individual particles. You see many particles moving in different trajectories simultaneously.
"They are dropping from the top of trajectory with steep angle."
Amazing how you can tell, from this old video, how the individual particles are moving.
Anyway, the point is dust particles never diffuse through air in this manner.
hks9900 3 years ago
"You see many particles moving in different trajectories simultaneously."
Are you seeing individual particles move in a trajectory , by any chance?
Do You have preternatural power?
"Amazing how you can tell, from this old video, how the individual particles are moving."
I didn't mention individual particles.
I can not confirm their trajectories move in parabolas.
"Anyway, the point is dust particles never diffuse through air in this manner."
No, the dust are diffuse clearly.
tkrWkLNsQk 3 years ago
nerds lol
danzingchic14 3 years ago
Hey, guess what.
Funny that i got 3.26667 m/s^2 in my calcs.
i multiplied that by a factor of three, and voila, i got the MAGIC NUMBER!!!
all the best
=)
philboy097 3 years ago
Yes, the MAGIC NUMBER is 9.8m/s^2.
That's g for Planet EARTH.
philboy097 3 years ago
"...because there was a whole lot of air on the moon. Right?".
No, we are knowing there is not atmosphere on the Moon from the observation , refraction of the stars to pass through near the surface of the moon .
tkrWkLNsQk 3 years ago
Sorry, I mistook other party to reply.
tkrWkLNsQk 3 years ago
Many thanks for this. Very much appreciated.
all the best
=)
philboy097 3 years ago
it's going to be nice if you can provide details of your calculation. for example, the assumptions that you made regarding the value of some of the key physical variables, like rotational velocity of the wheels & the initial velocity of the dust upon being kicked up by the wheels. thanks
=)
philboy097 3 years ago