glory? hahahahahaha you must be kidding, balme the jews and kill millions of "slavian ", Thanks to Soviet Russia that killed tha nzai dog and the evil rich.
@kingtiger009 because they bolth had a baby called north america then they had a big arguement and the baby (america) but the baby doesnt like the father cause hes racist and the mommy is drunk all the time (vodka)
@Chaos8282 For what, killing more of their own soldiers then the Germans did because of their no retreat policy?The Soviets only won because of the age old russian stratigy of attrition by charging head first into machine gun fire (which you would be executed if you did not, so it was either a 90% chance of death or a 100% chance). When I read a history book I actualy wonder why the Red Army did not rebel against the communist governments when the war ended, its not like they supported them.
@dave19941000 Sounds like you have watched enemy at the gates one too many times, and missed my point entirely. According to you the German army killed less then half of the 8 to 10 million or so Russian troops lost, leaving the rest to be killed by their own? Your actually saying that the Russians between 5 to 7 million troops themselves? Might want to read more than one history book lol. All that aside why wouldn't those who did fight not deserve respect?
@Chaos8282 No, the Red Army deserves the same level of respec that the German one does. There is a reason why the Red Army is nicknamed theof rapists, and why the monument in Berlin built to comemorate the unnamed fallen soldiers of the Red Army is called the statue of the unknown rapist. And then theres the government, look at the great purge, which killed off almost all the militaries high ranking officers, or their policies which killed, under Stalin, 40 million Soviets.
Too many men died.Long live the memory of German,Soviet,Romanian,French,British,Polish,Czech,Greek,Italian,Finlandian and other if i forget sorry.Bulild the a statue,never make difference only by political sistem,the soldier is a great man he fights,and he dies after that is forgoten and transformed in to a criminal,don't do the same mistake.I wish they are now in heaven.
@MARIOS666ful I am hopefully assuming that you know the famous Winston Churchill quote: 'Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks'. The Greeks paid a heavy price for their actions against the Axis; but if it was not for the sacrifice of the Greeks, WWII would have played itself out in a way that would have put the Allies at a further disadvantage. So it could be said that Greece helped win the war.
@TheNexTechnoViking Actually no. The russians won because the german supply lines were stretched too thin, the german troops rarely got supplies and their clothing wasn't suited. Also because the russians pushed the germans back the same way they invaded the germans had no russian farms, houses, or anything to loot because virtually all of it was destroyed as the germans came in. Also, Simo was definitely not the only brave finn, the entire nation ferociously defended their homeland.
Am I alone in the assumption that there will be another world war that happens in our generation? The entirety of the established western based civilizations have individually armed themselves to the teeth. As well has the Asian countries (especially China) have armed themselves greatly as well. What are the course of events leading us all into? I see a repeat of 1914 happening again soon. Another World War: many millions dead; perhaps it may be what needs to have happen to help fix the world.
The term: 'War on Terror' is as open ended as the vagueness of it's scope and it's time-frame. But those people we fight in Afghanistan are not a real advisory upon the same caliber as the Germans were in WWII, or what would have become the fight between the USA and Soviet Union during the Cold War, if it had turned hot. The point I was trying to make was that the military budgets throughout the world have been greatly increased. This condition will lead to the inevitable: Another World War.
@greatloss No, no they did not. They remained neutral through both world wars. The only fighting they did was if anyone strayed into their country and that never turned into any real warfare.
@Zero8654 They participated on an economic basis and not being not too discriminate on who they did business with.The primary reason Switzerland was not invaded is because of their international banking industry. The Swiss had a 'no questions asked' policy when it came to the nazi's, despite a percentage of their gold deposits were pulled from the teeth of dead Jews. This practice still exists today with Swiss bank accounts shielding the assets of corporate criminals from their home governmenets
@Shukuyou What country are you from? I can't think of any country who hasn't had some sort of conflict/violent unrest even within the past 100 years. Yes I am American, and damn proud of it, but many of the imperialist policies that our politicians have engaged in for the past 40 years is shameful and unproductive for mankind as a whole. Us Americans will be fighting another war soon, only this time it will be between ourselves. There is a sense of great unrest and social division going on here.
I'm Swedish and the last time Sweden were in war was 1814. We don't believe that guns and weapons can solve any problem, and therefore all types of weapons, if owned by a private person, are illegal in Sweden.
@germanfactoryD Russia is NOT in NATO, one way to figure that out is that Russia does not use NATO ammo for their weapons like 5.56 x 45mm or 7.62 x 51mm lol Great song btw
May I need to remaind you about Finland kicking your ass 10:1 in Winter War and Continuation War. One unite nation can beat a evil force. Finland is the wall against russian hate. My grandfather gave his life in Winter War. Our family won't ever forget that.
u westerners always say that everytime russia wins that in was accidantely!!!!
one time it was cold another time something else
russia won many times chingizkhan(even if its a fake made by russian king)
napoleon and hitler and for all of this you westerners says it just was some kind of luck,and not that they are truly strong nation and cant be defeated by force!!!
accept it russia played the main role in WW2, yes u all allies halped,but without russia hitler would ruin you already!!!!!
LOL. You are all talking about the "Great red army" Look back at their useless and backstabbing attack on Finland (where the ruski's red army suffered a great defeat).
This song tell us something wrong the Battle of Prokhorovka was a defeat for Russia not for germany, Russia had heavy losses. Kursk Battle was considered a draw, but germany could never recover from this battle losses.my respects for all people killed in this hideous war
da hier jeder englisch schreibt mach ich das mal auf deutsch ich liebe mein vaterland und ich bin stolz drauf aber den " sozialen abschaum " den es bei uns gibt sollte man so schnell wie möglich entsorgen und ich meine alles was arbeitsfaul ist und von meinen steuergeldern lebt geht wo anders schmarotzen das ist mein land
The video should be like 10 seconds longer because there's still an ending strum (don't know the actual name for it) that gets cut-off, so I would recommend adding that...
There were also many gentlemen in SS and Wermacht who just did their job. Among Finnish army, German was one of the best. Finland had the guts, German the technical ability.
@flykcrusader10xxx Fact of the matter is you, like most other young people in the U.S, are so fucking stupid they will spout out whatever bullshit they heard on some made for T.V movie, and tout it as fact. Problem is it serves no purpose other then showing your own poor intelligence level, and making other people think of us as brain dead rednecks.
@flykcrusader10xxx NO you said we are raping africa and world police that tax the shit out of its people. 1. we haven't "Raped" Africa at all. 2. Like any other major power we protect our interests abroad. 3. Judging by your profile picture you probably haven't paid any taxes at all. If you are so fucking proud with america and "Its" people but are so ashamed of its Un"angle" like status, why would you not fit right in with Obama and the lefties!
sorry for my english,i'm not a native speaker.and about that german superiority in arms.traning ,equipment etc. well they started the war they were preapred.
on the other side if not for the war ,and crazy nazi experiments many things would poprably never be invented
And about atck on russia during the ages , they allways do the same, they let enemies deep in to the contury and cut of the supply lines during the winter ,the cold will finish them off.
And about usa,france and uk i hope you know your conturies sponsored world war 2 ;] and usa was pritty much useless during most of the fights, same france westerplatte hold longer than entier french contury.uk helped when they were in danger ,+russians allways were traitors
@flykcrusader10xxx Judging by your poor grammar and flat out baseless lies I'd say your not american at all. No doubt an avid Obama supporter as well given that you admit defeat when it isn't warranted.
@ThoningMasteren I am afraid I feel differently. "Kampf" is a struggle, some form of turmoil a person pushes through. My books from Germany usually reveal tank/infantry battles as "Streit" would be a more combat version. This is a struggle of tanks.
Minor nitpick: Battle is usually given as "Schlacht" in German. "Streit", used in this context would be rather archaic (compare the Swedish "Stridsvagn"* for "battle tank", literally "battle wagon") as it is nowadays only used for interpersonal conflict between individuals in civilian context..;)
*please excuse any spelling errors, as I typed that from memory.
@ThoningMasteren Tank Fight* (the fields of Prokorovka was a tank fight and the russian had the upper hand, even though the German Blitzkrieg /lightning-fast\ was advancing fast, the russians had time to set defenses....the anti tank mines, also the T-34 matched up against the Panther tank, and the IS-2/ IS-3 matched up against the Tiger and King Tiger tank )
@BassLoverDude not realy.... they where just more and the germans where totally at their end of recources etc... and nothing matched the king tiger II, they only get fucked by them selfes (material damage, the engine died very often cause the tank was to heavy or it got stucked in mud, same reason) but yeah the germans lost this fight cause they let the russians prepeare their lines... and they didnt had muc recourcesl eft cause germany was on the ground....
@ThoningMasteren noooo.... you cannot translate panzer with armor cause its the synonyme for panzerkampfwagen (~armorcombatvehicle) what means TANK so it means tankbattle...
Panzerkampf= fighting, battle between or with the use of armoured vehicles (tanks). Also an expression about sexual intercourse with clothed persons, but seldom used.
@iumelen ehm not really. Armoured = gepanzert not Panzer, Panzer means tank!!!! It´s just a small different but it have an other meaning. Oh and I´m from germany so don´t tell me to learn german. Ich bin mir sehr sicher das meine Deutschkenntnisse ausreichend sind um einen deutschen Titel ins Englische zu übersetzen =).
It's Panzerkampf so it means combat with tanks : D you should listen to the lyrics and watch the vid instead of tryin' to understand the song's title :D
the first time i heard this song on my mp3 ill tell u my story...
i looked at the title panzerkampf i didnt hav a clue what this sabaton song is but i still downloaded it to my mp3 then i was listening to primo victoria and the came panzerkampf.. silence and then... INTO THE MOTHER LAND THE GERMAN ARMY MARCH it scared the fuck out of my and thats why its my favourite sabaton song!
The West cannot defeat Russia during the winter. It's a mistake they keep making. The Teutonic Knights during the crusade failed, Napoleon failed, and Hitler failed.
@Noise509 The west never thought "Oh! lets attack russia when its winter! What a GREAT tactic!". The reason is that they rarely have much of a choice. Usually they really had to, because russia were arming their troops, and as we all know, when they are armed, they zerg the fu**k out of you ;D
@askepus2 There's also the whole problem of it's size. I mean, Russia's big enough that basically anyone invading it will have to fight during winter, at some point. If you aren't equipped for it(like the Wehrmacht) and get stopped in your tracks then the enemy has the time that they need to regroup.
@xNealus He's actually quite correct, it was a mixture of weather conditions and Hitler's obsession with Stalingrad that saved Russia, if he had invaded sooner or not bothered with Stalingrad and instead focused on Moscow he would have won.
@MauledWolf Concentrating his entore south army force for stalingrad city itslef would been a lot better because the loss od stalingrad would been like I cut in the throat, heart still beats but blood spill out endlessly and eventualy whole body dies. It was the same with stalingrad and river volga, if the whole of stalingrad would've been captured germans could block the transports of oil up the rivers stream and no oil would reach main body of soviet army(only some small quantities could do)
@PolishWingedHussar10 Hmmm, I suppose so, but he could have also won if he concentrated on Moscow, he had two options available but wasn't focused enough. Stalingrad was mostly a symbol (bearing Stalin's name) hence why Hitler was so obsessed with it. Stalingrad might have been like a throat slash but Moscow would have been a curb stomp.
People saved Russia. They gatrered all their will and streght, formed in a fist and did it.
It's common errror about winter, I think someone's trying to completely change history, that's why everybody thinks so. And war is a thing not to be talken about... All that mess, deaths, questions who was right - it all just... does'n need to be discussed.
I'm math type, not historical, and I hate to read it - because history's probably changed million times.
@xNealus Well, I didn't say it was purely winter that saved Russia, it was a mixture of winter and Hitler going against the advice of his generals. I agree the Russians did rally together, but in the early stages of the war they surrendered to the Germans in thousands, they simply had enough of the Soviet system. If Hitler hadn't applied his racist policies and instead recruited them into Russian divisions they would have most likely kept doing it.
@Sponcek really now? So then when the germans were defeated at stalingrad im guessing its the croatians fault? Also who was the main force to launch operation barberossa in the first place? Oh yea thats right the german main army not the croatians.
@Sponcek Well when it comes to history things are serious and not to be messed with. Immaturity is which causes hisotry to get screwed up because people like you make up stupid shit like "Croatia did all of the work!" Yea i doubt 1,000 croatians did a bunch of shit in the whole battle for stalingrad. YOU dont know what your talking about and please provide proof on how they helped alot, other wise dont spew your garbage.
@Sponcek i forgett somthing... there where 850'000 germans ok 849'000 germans and 1000 croatians
first they where and ss troup... ss means "sehr schlecht" = very bad
the german army was the best army in this hohle period but the ss troups sucked the most!!! and 1000 croatians didnt do much in a battle like this esxcept of dying and wondering why they dont repawn
@TrulleX The Waffen SS were expertised in every weapon and every kind of combat making them better from the SAS,the Rangers and so.....of course the equipment was different and difficult to compare.But,still they were not the German Army Elites!The Elites were the Fallschirmjagers(Paratroopers) that,despite their name, many times fought on foot alongside the infantrymen.
@aullikTheBrain The SS were the elite of the German Army...they also had to be card-carrying Nazi Party members, think of them as SEALS, just part of the German Army.
@KRAUTKICKER The SS was the elite of the German Army, but they're nothing compared to Rangers, SEALs, SF, anything we got today. They didn't even compare to Rangers in the 40s.
@NewMexicoJoe505 Well, they were the best of the German Army....I guess then a better comparison would be with the WWII era 101st Airborne, except with tank units as well and no specialty in airdrops
the ss was called "sehr schlecht" by the wehrmacht troups just for kidding them, because the wehrmacht didnt like the ss troups because they felt like something better then the wehrmacht troups.
got this information from my grandpa and he fought in the wehrmacht.
Waffen-SS=elite troops, SS was a more political thing, not an actual fighting force, actually some kind of elite militia (as the SA was meant to be a militia at the beginning). Service in the Waffen-SS war freewilled, so they were more some sort of professional soldiers. Major difference was that the support for the Waffen-SS was mechanized, and the majoprity of the Wehrmacht still depended upon Horses and such things for getting supplies.
@MauledWolf There was no way the Germans could win the war, Soviets would have fought on had Moscow fallen, the Germans simply didn't have the men, matériel, or supplies to conquer them, the Soviets would simply fight from the Urals where their factories were. The front would only get wider as they got past Moscow, and they were already stretched out too thin in 1941. and up to the winter of 1941. the Soviets were mostly disorganized so the Germans were lucky to get as far as they got...
@Arg0n01 Actually, while the Third Reich was low on supplies and whatnot, the Third Reich didn't exactly want the entire USSR under its rule. They wanted their oil fields to continue the fight against the British and the Americans. The proper term would be that the USSR got lucky. Stalingrad wasn't top priority. It was simply a demoralizing act. If the Wehrmacht would have had continued towards their primary goal, they might have had succeeded after all.
@Parham1995 Yes, possibly they didn't want the whole Soviet Union, but you cannot wage partial war with the Soviets, for as long as they can fight they will keep on fighting, and a war of attrition against the Soviet Union was simply not winnable. Germans were lucky across the board, all those Versailles treaty breaches with no sanctions, the unopposed invasion of Poland, the botched allied invasion of Norway, Stalin's purges (USSR had the most proficient army before the purges).
@Arg0n01 Well, WWII began when Poland was conquered, or while being conquered, so I won't say "unopposed", exactly. Well, the theory was, capture the oil fields, and demoralize the USSR far enough, they'd give up just as they had back in WWI. The Blitz tactic was demoralizing in general. What they didn't really count on was the tactics the Red Army used to counter the Blitz. Getting pinned-down back in Stalingrad didn't help either. They might have had a chance if they left Stalingrad.
@Parham1995 But they didn't have enough power to take the oilfields. The oil fields are in the Caucasus, and blitzkrieg is unfeasible in the mountains, the Soviets wear out the attackers so they can mount a strategic flank from Stalingrad, fairly simple thing happens to work. And what I meant unopposed was the fact that the wester allies of Poland didn't act even though they had an overwhelming numerical superiority on the west border on Germany (110 vs. 23 divisions, almost 5 times as much).
@Arg0n01 Yes, that's right. They were in the Caucasus. It was a desperate attack, really. Look at in this way, the British had the Middle-East (well, most of it, that is). It was impossible to go there. The Red Army was known to be a very inferior force back then (after a frontier war, against the Finnish, I think?), and Hitler was as delusional as ever. I personally think (I'm probably wrong) that a speedy victory would have had been possible, if they had just Blitzed through.
Die Deutschen haben tapfer und unerbitterlich gekämpft und haben es immerhin bis Stalingrad geschafft, welche Nation kann schon sowas von sich behaupten. Und das die Deutschen die schlimmsten Kriegsverbrechen begannen haben ist Quatsch, da die Russen wohl noch ein Stück schlimmer gehandelt haben. Lediglich die westlichen Mächte waren gut zu uns Deutschen, da wir auch gut zu Ihren Kriegsgefangenen waren.
@123BeanJim die russen haben frei nach gleich mit gleich und feuer mit feuer bekämpfen gehandelt..stell du dir mal vor das eine fremde macht dein land besetzt, deine äcker zetritt, deine städte verbrennt , deine brüder und vorväter tötet und deine mutter und schwestern versklavt wenn nicht gar schlimmeres....ich glaube da währe jeder ein wenig angepisst und würde hart zurückschlagen.
@123BeanJim Am Arsch. Die Deutschen, wie auch die Russen haben Kriegsverbrechen begangen. Da gibt es keine Ausnahme. Die Deutzschen haben gemordet und die Russen haben auch gemordet, als Antwort. Solange es Menschen gibt, wird es Kriege geben.
well, the Soviet army was really great at the end of ww2. They also freed Poland from the nazis. Well, 5 years before they killed some thousand Polish soldiers at Katyn, and stood still during the Warsaw uprising...
But, still great army. But then came the communists, and they weren't great at all...
@Loucenteam Hmmmm, they did kick the "Nazis" out, but only to install their puppets, trade one dictatorship for another, not really much of a liberation. But eh, they were brave soldiers.
@MauledWolf Brave indeed but without honour to treat simple people of those countries especialy women of germany which fell victim to the worst and the largest mass rape in the human history. Lets just skip pass the fate of german POWs which were either shot or sent to siberia(my own granfather participated in killing pows which was a coomon thing on eastern front) those things were happening cause war is war. Women took no part in this war but yet many of them fell victim to these russian hords
@PolishWingedHussar10 Aye, I was mostly getting at the civillians who suffered at the hands of the Red Army, I just don't understand why people glorify them and the Soviets so much is all. They weren't liberators, they were just another form of oppressor.
@MauledWolf The reason for that is just that they were the ones who bore brunt of major fighting and they engaged the largest body of german army. The westeners just never tasted the soviet rule and so they dont see anything wrong with them but infact they were just as cruel, merciless and murderous power as nazie germany or probably worse. Russians were cruel even in 1939 polish invasion, on-site POW and NCO executions in many places, mass murders, torturs and mass persecution of innocent poles
What this is movie ??
FenneQa 5 days ago
@FenneQa It's real war
x0mega1 4 days ago
@FenneQa
Enemy at the Gates.
TroTLF 2 days ago
invaders of my country have been destroyed
MorrisDes 1 month ago
the glory of the third reich will never be forgotten!
svenskmaktfinneslakt 1 month ago
@svenskmaktfinneslakt
glory? hahahahahaha you must be kidding, balme the jews and kill millions of "slavian ", Thanks to Soviet Russia that killed tha nzai dog and the evil rich.
SportakooZ 1 month ago
@SportakooZ you shouldent say soviet russia killed them! they could not defeat them whit out the help of the allieds!
sotahullu1 1 month ago
@sotahullu1
true. I think USA could join earlier but polticis sux :)
SportakooZ 1 month ago
why is the germany called the father land and russia
called the mother land?
kingtiger009 2 months ago
@kingtiger009 Because of language declesion.
Ntsbhdb 2 months ago
@kingtiger009 because they bolth had a baby called north america then they had a big arguement and the baby (america) but the baby doesnt like the father cause hes racist and the mommy is drunk all the time (vodka)
Blueatchley12 1 month ago
Tanks: 1:24 Ferdinand,1:25 Tiger,1:52 Stug 3,2:07 pzkpfw 3/4,2:11 pzkpfw 3,2:15 SU-76,Pzkpwf 2, SU-26,4:59 Pzkpfw 4,SU-152.
GuytarZ 2 months ago 2
@GuytarZ ur point is and thats not a paner kaumfagen 3/4 never made called a panzer 3 ausj A
Blueatchley12 1 month ago
i love this song and sabaton
cheesymcnuggets123 3 months ago
Politics aside, Soviet troops had some big balls and deserve respect for what they overcame.
Chaos8282 3 months ago
@Chaos8282 For what, killing more of their own soldiers then the Germans did because of their no retreat policy?The Soviets only won because of the age old russian stratigy of attrition by charging head first into machine gun fire (which you would be executed if you did not, so it was either a 90% chance of death or a 100% chance). When I read a history book I actualy wonder why the Red Army did not rebel against the communist governments when the war ended, its not like they supported them.
dave19941000 3 months ago
@dave19941000 Sounds like you have watched enemy at the gates one too many times, and missed my point entirely. According to you the German army killed less then half of the 8 to 10 million or so Russian troops lost, leaving the rest to be killed by their own? Your actually saying that the Russians between 5 to 7 million troops themselves? Might want to read more than one history book lol. All that aside why wouldn't those who did fight not deserve respect?
Chaos8282 3 months ago
@Chaos8282 No, the Red Army deserves the same level of respec that the German one does. There is a reason why the Red Army is nicknamed theof rapists, and why the monument in Berlin built to comemorate the unnamed fallen soldiers of the Red Army is called the statue of the unknown rapist. And then theres the government, look at the great purge, which killed off almost all the militaries high ranking officers, or their policies which killed, under Stalin, 40 million Soviets.
dave19941000 3 months ago
Brothers just listen to our history professor Sabaton and not fight on who is wrong or right and who is the best, just leave at the porn site :D
cal45deserteagle 3 months ago
Too many men died.Long live the memory of German,Soviet,Romanian,French,British,Polish,Czech,Greek,Italian,Finlandian and other if i forget sorry.Bulild the a statue,never make difference only by political sistem,the soldier is a great man he fights,and he dies after that is forgoten and transformed in to a criminal,don't do the same mistake.I wish they are now in heaven.
erwinrommel4143 3 months ago
my country has bitten germani,bulgaria,itali and turkey(sorry foe the english i am from greece so i dont speak the english realy good
MARIOS666ful 3 months ago
@MARIOS666ful I am hopefully assuming that you know the famous Winston Churchill quote: 'Hence you will not say that Greeks fight like heroes but that heroes fight like Greeks'. The Greeks paid a heavy price for their actions against the Axis; but if it was not for the sacrifice of the Greeks, WWII would have played itself out in a way that would have put the Allies at a further disadvantage. So it could be said that Greece helped win the war.
greatloss 3 months ago
Comment removed
MARIOS666ful 3 months ago
Russia is in NATO.
The only brave Finn is Simo Häyhä. He is ugly as FUCK.
Russia won against Germany because of their numbers.
YOU MAD?
TheNexTechnoViking 4 months ago
@TheNexTechnoViking No they wwon because they were wreckless. YOU PISSED?!
ivargmer 4 months ago in playlist ivargmer sine favorittvideoer
@TheNexTechnoViking No they wwon because they were wreckless. YOU MAD?
ivargmer 4 months ago in playlist ivargmer sine favorittvideoer
@ivargmer trolls trolling trolls. YOU MAD?
TheNexTechnoViking 3 months ago
@TheNexTechnoViking Actually no. The russians won because the german supply lines were stretched too thin, the german troops rarely got supplies and their clothing wasn't suited. Also because the russians pushed the germans back the same way they invaded the germans had no russian farms, houses, or anything to loot because virtually all of it was destroyed as the germans came in. Also, Simo was definitely not the only brave finn, the entire nation ferociously defended their homeland.
Zero8654 3 months ago
@Zero8654 YOU MAD BRO?
TheNexTechnoViking 3 months ago
@TheNexTechnoViking not really. I was trying to just have an intelligent discussion.
Zero8654 3 months ago
Am I alone in the assumption that there will be another world war that happens in our generation? The entirety of the established western based civilizations have individually armed themselves to the teeth. As well has the Asian countries (especially China) have armed themselves greatly as well. What are the course of events leading us all into? I see a repeat of 1914 happening again soon. Another World War: many millions dead; perhaps it may be what needs to have happen to help fix the world.
greatloss 4 months ago
@greatloss
There is already a third world war going on. It began in 2002 and there is no end in sight. Some call it "The War on Terror".
Shukuyou 4 months ago
The term: 'War on Terror' is as open ended as the vagueness of it's scope and it's time-frame. But those people we fight in Afghanistan are not a real advisory upon the same caliber as the Germans were in WWII, or what would have become the fight between the USA and Soviet Union during the Cold War, if it had turned hot. The point I was trying to make was that the military budgets throughout the world have been greatly increased. This condition will lead to the inevitable: Another World War.
greatloss 3 months ago
@greatloss
Your country may be fighting in Afghanistan and such in the war on terror, but not my country. We havn't been at war in 197 years.
Shukuyou 3 months ago
@Shukuyou
realy we had a world war like 71 years ago and a worldwar means that the whole world is affected / into that war :3
darkerthanblackful 3 months ago
@darkerthanblackful
We are the true Neutral Nation. We are Sweden.
Shukuyou 3 months ago
@darkerthanblackful It affected the whole world but not every state participated, examples being switzerland and sweden.
Zero8654 3 months ago
@Zero8654 The Swiss did not participate? LOL!
greatloss 3 months ago
@greatloss No, no they did not. They remained neutral through both world wars. The only fighting they did was if anyone strayed into their country and that never turned into any real warfare.
Zero8654 3 months ago
@Zero8654 They participated on an economic basis and not being not too discriminate on who they did business with.The primary reason Switzerland was not invaded is because of their international banking industry. The Swiss had a 'no questions asked' policy when it came to the nazi's, despite a percentage of their gold deposits were pulled from the teeth of dead Jews. This practice still exists today with Swiss bank accounts shielding the assets of corporate criminals from their home governmenets
greatloss 3 months ago
Comment removed
greatloss 3 months ago
@Shukuyou What country are you from? I can't think of any country who hasn't had some sort of conflict/violent unrest even within the past 100 years. Yes I am American, and damn proud of it, but many of the imperialist policies that our politicians have engaged in for the past 40 years is shameful and unproductive for mankind as a whole. Us Americans will be fighting another war soon, only this time it will be between ourselves. There is a sense of great unrest and social division going on here.
greatloss 3 months ago
@greatloss
I'm Swedish and the last time Sweden were in war was 1814. We don't believe that guns and weapons can solve any problem, and therefore all types of weapons, if owned by a private person, are illegal in Sweden.
Shukuyou 3 months ago
Yea stoppable T-26 with machinegun, piece of shit but if 1000 vs tiger the crew can burn tiger.. pffff shit allover!
88Phobos 4 months ago
can some1 pls tell me wats the name of the movie at 3:38 ?
loveno11994 4 months ago
@loveno11994 Enemy At The Gates.
spungray 4 months ago
NOBODY WILL WIN RUSSIA BY FORCE!!!
IF YOU NATO WILL DARE TO START A WAR AS YOU DO WITH MANY COUNTRIES FOR TO GET OIL
I LL SHOW YOU HOW IT WILL BE TO GET FUCKED
kirill16108 4 months ago
@kirill16108
lol u mad bro?
PSIH KAKOI TA! LOL
SportakooZ 4 months ago
@kirill16108 russia is in the nato dude ...
germanfactoryD 4 months ago
@germanfactoryD no it issent dude :D
kauda8 4 months ago
@germanfactoryD ... i have no idea what you guys are arguing about but Russia is NOT in NATO...
scarab088 4 months ago
@germanfactoryD Russia is NOT in NATO, one way to figure that out is that Russia does not use NATO ammo for their weapons like 5.56 x 45mm or 7.62 x 51mm lol Great song btw
Wulfkinxwartooth 4 months ago
@kirill16108 Russia had a shovel up their ass against Finland in ww2. Hyvää!
Flipifyify 4 months ago
@Flipifyify the shovel is in your ass only faggot
if i ll meet u i ll show u how did we had a shovel
put shovel in my ass then i ll beleive
kirill16108 4 months ago
@kirill16108
May I need to remaind you about Finland kicking your ass 10:1 in Winter War and Continuation War. One unite nation can beat a evil force. Finland is the wall against russian hate. My grandfather gave his life in Winter War. Our family won't ever forget that.
PatriotFinn 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
u westerners always say that everytime russia wins that in was accidantely!!!!
one time it was cold another time something else
russia won many times chingizkhan(even if its a fake made by russian king)
napoleon and hitler and for all of this you westerners says it just was some kind of luck,and not that they are truly strong nation and cant be defeated by force!!!
accept it russia played the main role in WW2, yes u all allies halped,but without russia hitler would ruin you already!!!!!
kirill16108 4 months ago
Who was bigger idiot? Hitler who think that he will defeted Russia or Stalin who allied with Hitler and invade Poland?
1000razyja 4 months ago
LOL. You are all talking about the "Great red army" Look back at their useless and backstabbing attack on Finland (where the ruski's red army suffered a great defeat).
What was the greatness in that?
War heroes? I don't think so...
HeavyHertzum 4 months ago
This song tell us something wrong the Battle of Prokhorovka was a defeat for Russia not for germany, Russia had heavy losses. Kursk Battle was considered a draw, but germany could never recover from this battle losses.my respects for all people killed in this hideous war
bl1tzwar 4 months ago
t-26 are so funny..
kafel92 4 months ago
BEST INTRO EVER!
dfuhr7gm42 4 months ago
ONE M0:00 TIME!!!
MrWWIIACE 5 months ago in playlist Fav Music :D
Thumbs up if you're going to listen to this while playing Red Orchestra 2.
EveryThangElectronic 5 months ago
Red Orchestra 2 release soon, yay!
missedthelikebutton 5 months ago
@missedthelikebutton the beta start !!!!!!
wolfimd 5 months ago
2:23, holy shit, a PTRS burst! hardcore
Scoutrussp7 5 months ago
da hier jeder englisch schreibt mach ich das mal auf deutsch ich liebe mein vaterland und ich bin stolz drauf aber den " sozialen abschaum " den es bei uns gibt sollte man so schnell wie möglich entsorgen und ich meine alles was arbeitsfaul ist und von meinen steuergeldern lebt geht wo anders schmarotzen das ist mein land
4711Devil 5 months ago
Great video!I hope they don't censore it.
sgtkar98 5 months ago
rather be dead than Russian
11Imperion 5 months ago
@11Imperion and @FortuneSoldier95 I'm red and proud
YuTao3215 5 months ago
@11Imperion Russians are the living dead.
Tom David
Minneapolis
TomDavid88 5 months ago
@TomDavid88 Tormented souls, that's what they are...
chapiit08 5 months ago
Better dead than red
FortuneSoldier95 5 months ago
Ihr Pisser ward doch bis in Keller getrieben,wär die Kälte nich gewesen würdet ihr heut Deutsch sprechen!!!!!-Lutscher!!!-
Nichts is vergessen-der Tag kommt!
MsWarlock1972 5 months ago
SIEG HEIL !!!
iliqnktz123 5 months ago
@iliqnktz123 shut up nazi
YuTao3215 5 months ago
If I was a russian man or soviet man , I have not doubt : I had the biggger proud to fight against the nazi fascist and win. Glory to the Red Army!!
hell4367 5 months ago
The video should be like 10 seconds longer because there's still an ending strum (don't know the actual name for it) that gets cut-off, so I would recommend adding that...
ObssesedNuker 5 months ago
There were also many gentlemen in SS and Wermacht who just did their job. Among Finnish army, German was one of the best. Finland had the guts, German the technical ability.
PatriotFinn 5 months ago in playlist Sabaton Live
Ха-ха-ха, наши выиграли!
BalistikJumbo 6 months ago
Close your eyes....I see T34s charging at full throttle through the Russian Taiga...once more victorious the red army stands!
KnorpelDelux 6 months ago
THIIIIIIIIIS SONG JUST MAKES ME WANNA RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!!!!!!!
RoxoR67 6 months ago
Into the Motherland the german army marchs!
HerrStrelok 6 months ago
you got to love the "IN TO THE MOTHERLAND THE GERMAN ARMY MARCH" its just badass
peetree96 6 months ago
Where are the last two tones making this song perfect?
KnorpelDelux 6 months ago
Sabaton поет про битву на Курской Дуге!!! Потрясающе!!! <3Sabaton'n'Russia!!!
HellRoodaka 6 months ago
@flykcrusader10xxx Truth is that your a dumb shit, and I have little tolerance for it.
Chaos8282 6 months ago
@flykcrusader10xxx Fact of the matter is you, like most other young people in the U.S, are so fucking stupid they will spout out whatever bullshit they heard on some made for T.V movie, and tout it as fact. Problem is it serves no purpose other then showing your own poor intelligence level, and making other people think of us as brain dead rednecks.
Chaos8282 6 months ago
@flykcrusader10xxx NO you said we are raping africa and world police that tax the shit out of its people. 1. we haven't "Raped" Africa at all. 2. Like any other major power we protect our interests abroad. 3. Judging by your profile picture you probably haven't paid any taxes at all. If you are so fucking proud with america and "Its" people but are so ashamed of its Un"angle" like status, why would you not fit right in with Obama and the lefties!
Chaos8282 6 months ago
the persons in the video were from the 9th panzerdivision ;)
666donar 6 months ago
sorry for my english,i'm not a native speaker.and about that german superiority in arms.traning ,equipment etc. well they started the war they were preapred.
on the other side if not for the war ,and crazy nazi experiments many things would poprably never be invented
TheBrudnyharry 6 months ago
panzerkampf meenz arored war.
And about atck on russia during the ages , they allways do the same, they let enemies deep in to the contury and cut of the supply lines during the winter ,the cold will finish them off.
And about usa,france and uk i hope you know your conturies sponsored world war 2 ;] and usa was pritty much useless during most of the fights, same france westerplatte hold longer than entier french contury.uk helped when they were in danger ,+russians allways were traitors
TheBrudnyharry 6 months ago
@flykcrusader10xxx Judging by your poor grammar and flat out baseless lies I'd say your not american at all. No doubt an avid Obama supporter as well given that you admit defeat when it isn't warranted.
Chaos8282 6 months ago
what does Panzerkampf mean i know panzer is tank ?
Thecagedshield 6 months ago
@Thecagedshield battle armor..
0rz93 6 months ago
@Thecagedshield Kampf is a combat or batle so its something like armored combat
ThoningMasteren 6 months ago 16
@ThoningMasteren I am afraid I feel differently. "Kampf" is a struggle, some form of turmoil a person pushes through. My books from Germany usually reveal tank/infantry battles as "Streit" would be a more combat version. This is a struggle of tanks.
DeutscherausRussland 6 months ago
@DeutscherausRussland Indeed.
Minor nitpick: Battle is usually given as "Schlacht" in German. "Streit", used in this context would be rather archaic (compare the Swedish "Stridsvagn"* for "battle tank", literally "battle wagon") as it is nowadays only used for interpersonal conflict between individuals in civilian context..;)
*please excuse any spelling errors, as I typed that from memory.
ChuutRiit 6 months ago
@DeutscherausRussland It's in one word and it means Panzer Battle
scullyy 6 months ago
@ThoningMasteren Yeah Tankskirmish fits it.
KnorpelDelux 6 months ago
@ThoningMasteren It must not be an armored combat .... cat´s can fight too ,or kids... verb:"kämpfen"
Stefan010796 6 months ago
@ThoningMasteren panzer is german for tank so u r correct thanks for clearing that up for me
Sirjohn2421 6 months ago
@ThoningMasteren Tank Fight* (the fields of Prokorovka was a tank fight and the russian had the upper hand, even though the German Blitzkrieg /lightning-fast\ was advancing fast, the russians had time to set defenses....the anti tank mines, also the T-34 matched up against the Panther tank, and the IS-2/ IS-3 matched up against the Tiger and King Tiger tank )
BassLoverDude 6 months ago
@BassLoverDude not realy.... they where just more and the germans where totally at their end of recources etc... and nothing matched the king tiger II, they only get fucked by them selfes (material damage, the engine died very often cause the tank was to heavy or it got stucked in mud, same reason) but yeah the germans lost this fight cause they let the russians prepeare their lines... and they didnt had muc recourcesl eft cause germany was on the ground....
aullikTheBrain 6 months ago
@aullikTheBrain okkie then....
BassLoverDude 6 months ago
@ThoningMasteren no its battle armor
doty4454 6 months ago
@ThoningMasteren noooo.... you cannot translate panzer with armor cause its the synonyme for panzerkampfwagen (~armorcombatvehicle) what means TANK so it means tankbattle...
aullikTheBrain 6 months ago
@ThoningMasteren
Panzerkampf= fighting, battle between or with the use of armoured vehicles (tanks). Also an expression about sexual intercourse with clothed persons, but seldom used.
Heiliger666 5 months ago
@Heiliger666 I DONT CARE!!! I've recieved 10 messaged from people telling ME what it is... I didnt even ASK?!
ThoningMasteren 5 months ago
@ThoningMasteren i think they think it makes them seem really smart when they correct someone on translations, it just makes them seem annoying
dudesonsrock23 5 months ago
@ThoningMasteren hey the title Panzerkampf means tankfight
FeuerwehrLz13 5 months ago
@FeuerwehrLz13 Kampf = fight .. so Panzerkampf = Armoured combat ! learn German and English guys =P
iumelen 5 months ago
@iumelen ehm not really. Armoured = gepanzert not Panzer, Panzer means tank!!!! It´s just a small different but it have an other meaning. Oh and I´m from germany so don´t tell me to learn german. Ich bin mir sehr sicher das meine Deutschkenntnisse ausreichend sind um einen deutschen Titel ins Englische zu übersetzen =).
FeuerwehrLz13 3 months ago
@ThoningMasteren das ist correct ^^
Mrmudicfortifacation 5 months ago
@ThoningMasteren
jeesh learn German or stfu!!!
It's Panzerkampf so it means combat with tanks : D you should listen to the lyrics and watch the vid instead of tryin' to understand the song's title :D
18947ful 4 months ago
@18947ful I don't fucking care!?
ThoningMasteren 4 months ago
@ThoningMasteren
^^ do you think I did in the first place? :D
18947ful 4 months ago
@Thecagedshield
It means tank fight.
KPHans 6 months ago
zarypiaszcze ziom
widać że się postarałeś
Maxnascie 6 months ago
the first time i heard this song on my mp3 ill tell u my story...
i looked at the title panzerkampf i didnt hav a clue what this sabaton song is but i still downloaded it to my mp3 then i was listening to primo victoria and the came panzerkampf.. silence and then... INTO THE MOTHER LAND THE GERMAN ARMY MARCH it scared the fuck out of my and thats why its my favourite sabaton song!
TheGERO418 6 months ago
@flykcrusader10xxx this was the first unbrian wast comment of an american i have seen
it was a compliment
boomudead96 6 months ago
Great, and now lets listen to the first suggestion! Wait - Miley Cyrus?
FrisianDude 6 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
@FrisianDude - Miley Cyrus hmmm oki.... you Scare me TOO now :P ! hehehehe
iumelen 5 months ago
Skurwysyńskie nazistowskie pedały.
Przepraszam napiłem się.
remogiusz89 7 months ago
Stalin was a maniac, Hitler was a maniac. Take no sides.
jokurandomlol 7 months ago
The West cannot defeat Russia during the winter. It's a mistake they keep making. The Teutonic Knights during the crusade failed, Napoleon failed, and Hitler failed.
Noise509 7 months ago
@Noise509 The west never thought "Oh! lets attack russia when its winter! What a GREAT tactic!". The reason is that they rarely have much of a choice. Usually they really had to, because russia were arming their troops, and as we all know, when they are armed, they zerg the fu**k out of you ;D
askepus2 7 months ago
@askepus2 There's also the whole problem of it's size. I mean, Russia's big enough that basically anyone invading it will have to fight during winter, at some point. If you aren't equipped for it(like the Wehrmacht) and get stopped in your tracks then the enemy has the time that they need to regroup.
yellowmrslzlzshfksj 6 months ago
Oh Leksands IF, Blåvita lag, kämpa för skölden stark är vår sak, oh Leksands IF , blåvita lag, stor är vår seger när slaget är klart.
DerRealLoewe 7 months ago
i'm with the germans... and will always be... but this song fucking rocks!!! ;)
DarkElfsDecay 7 months ago
Кто не в курсе о чем песня, наберите в поиске "Sabaton русские субтитры". А то я смотрю их тут к нацистам причислили. Все с точностью до наоборот.
Trender2005 7 months ago
winter save russia.
deathwalkerunited 7 months ago
@deathwalkerunited
You know nothing
xNealus 7 months ago
@xNealus He's actually quite correct, it was a mixture of weather conditions and Hitler's obsession with Stalingrad that saved Russia, if he had invaded sooner or not bothered with Stalingrad and instead focused on Moscow he would have won.
MauledWolf 7 months ago
@MauledWolf Concentrating his entore south army force for stalingrad city itslef would been a lot better because the loss od stalingrad would been like I cut in the throat, heart still beats but blood spill out endlessly and eventualy whole body dies. It was the same with stalingrad and river volga, if the whole of stalingrad would've been captured germans could block the transports of oil up the rivers stream and no oil would reach main body of soviet army(only some small quantities could do)
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@PolishWingedHussar10 Hmmm, I suppose so, but he could have also won if he concentrated on Moscow, he had two options available but wasn't focused enough. Stalingrad was mostly a symbol (bearing Stalin's name) hence why Hitler was so obsessed with it. Stalingrad might have been like a throat slash but Moscow would have been a curb stomp.
MauledWolf 7 months ago
@MauledWolf
People saved Russia. They gatrered all their will and streght, formed in a fist and did it.
It's common errror about winter, I think someone's trying to completely change history, that's why everybody thinks so. And war is a thing not to be talken about... All that mess, deaths, questions who was right - it all just... does'n need to be discussed.
I'm math type, not historical, and I hate to read it - because history's probably changed million times.
I'm sorry for my english.
xNealus 7 months ago
@xNealus Well, I didn't say it was purely winter that saved Russia, it was a mixture of winter and Hitler going against the advice of his generals. I agree the Russians did rally together, but in the early stages of the war they surrendered to the Germans in thousands, they simply had enough of the Soviet system. If Hitler hadn't applied his racist policies and instead recruited them into Russian divisions they would have most likely kept doing it.
Nothing wrong with your English, it's fine.
MauledWolf 6 months ago
You know what?
Croatian SS DIVISION - BLACK LEGION in stalingrad did all of the work :P
They were much better then ANY German troop.
Like napoleon himself told that one Croatian soldier is like 50 french soldiers at 1800s... And then French had proffesional army so :D
=U= If you know what that means xD
Sponcek 6 months ago
@Sponcek really now? So then when the germans were defeated at stalingrad im guessing its the croatians fault? Also who was the main force to launch operation barberossa in the first place? Oh yea thats right the german main army not the croatians.
KenFranchino 6 months ago
@KenFranchino
Kill yourself it was like 1000 croatian troops.... man you shouldn't take STUFF seriusly if you don't know what are ya talkin' 'bout...
But CROATIA DID help alot in Stalingrad !
Sponcek 6 months ago
@Sponcek Well when it comes to history things are serious and not to be messed with. Immaturity is which causes hisotry to get screwed up because people like you make up stupid shit like "Croatia did all of the work!" Yea i doubt 1,000 croatians did a bunch of shit in the whole battle for stalingrad. YOU dont know what your talking about and please provide proof on how they helped alot, other wise dont spew your garbage.
KenFranchino 6 months ago
@Sponcek 1'000 croatians +1'700'000 soviets
yes you croatians did all the work...
aullikTheBrain 6 months ago
@Sponcek i forgett somthing... there where 850'000 germans ok 849'000 germans and 1000 croatians
first they where and ss troup... ss means "sehr schlecht" = very bad
the german army was the best army in this hohle period but the ss troups sucked the most!!! and 1000 croatians didnt do much in a battle like this esxcept of dying and wondering why they dont repawn
aullikTheBrain 6 months ago
@aullikTheBrain
SS means Schutzstaffel which mean defence corps, try to be less wrong in the future
rapsarG 6 months ago in playlist Panzer
@aullikTheBrain The SS did not suck they were a Elite, kind of like SAS or the Rangers or something like that.
TrulleX 6 months ago
@TrulleX The Waffen SS were expertised in every weapon and every kind of combat making them better from the SAS,the Rangers and so.....of course the equipment was different and difficult to compare.But,still they were not the German Army Elites!The Elites were the Fallschirmjagers(Paratroopers) that,despite their name, many times fought on foot alongside the infantrymen.
theodorosregmt 5 months ago
@aullikTheBrain The SS were the elite of the German Army...they also had to be card-carrying Nazi Party members, think of them as SEALS, just part of the German Army.
KRAUTKICKER 6 months ago
@KRAUTKICKER The SS was the elite of the German Army, but they're nothing compared to Rangers, SEALs, SF, anything we got today. They didn't even compare to Rangers in the 40s.
NewMexicoJoe505 6 months ago
@NewMexicoJoe505 Well, they were the best of the German Army....I guess then a better comparison would be with the WWII era 101st Airborne, except with tank units as well and no specialty in airdrops
KRAUTKICKER 6 months ago
@aullikTheBrain
SS Strom troopers... ......
Elite soldiers in Germany alost resposible for Gestapo and holocaust....
Watch more tv dude...
Sponcek 6 months ago
@aullikTheBrain
the ss was called "sehr schlecht" by the wehrmacht troups just for kidding them, because the wehrmacht didnt like the ss troups because they felt like something better then the wehrmacht troups.
got this information from my grandpa and he fought in the wehrmacht.
fl4sher1 6 months ago
@fl4sher1 i know, my grandpa told me the same... and know i get douzen of flame comments on how stupid i am....
fact is that the german army had their own elite troups and the ss troups where just a bunsh of extremists trained by nazi ideologists,
yeah they were a bit better trained then the normal army but they rushed in every situation, cause they thought they are the best!!!
aullikTheBrain 6 months ago
@fl4sher1
Waffen-SS=elite troops, SS was a more political thing, not an actual fighting force, actually some kind of elite militia (as the SA was meant to be a militia at the beginning). Service in the Waffen-SS war freewilled, so they were more some sort of professional soldiers. Major difference was that the support for the Waffen-SS was mechanized, and the majoprity of the Wehrmacht still depended upon Horses and such things for getting supplies.
Heiliger666 5 months ago
@Heiliger666
i didnt say the ss was a fighting force, just that the ss felt like something better than the wehrmacht.
fl4sher1 5 months ago
@MauledWolf There was no way the Germans could win the war, Soviets would have fought on had Moscow fallen, the Germans simply didn't have the men, matériel, or supplies to conquer them, the Soviets would simply fight from the Urals where their factories were. The front would only get wider as they got past Moscow, and they were already stretched out too thin in 1941. and up to the winter of 1941. the Soviets were mostly disorganized so the Germans were lucky to get as far as they got...
Arg0n01 5 months ago
@Arg0n01 Actually, while the Third Reich was low on supplies and whatnot, the Third Reich didn't exactly want the entire USSR under its rule. They wanted their oil fields to continue the fight against the British and the Americans. The proper term would be that the USSR got lucky. Stalingrad wasn't top priority. It was simply a demoralizing act. If the Wehrmacht would have had continued towards their primary goal, they might have had succeeded after all.
Parham1995 5 months ago
@Parham1995 Yes, possibly they didn't want the whole Soviet Union, but you cannot wage partial war with the Soviets, for as long as they can fight they will keep on fighting, and a war of attrition against the Soviet Union was simply not winnable. Germans were lucky across the board, all those Versailles treaty breaches with no sanctions, the unopposed invasion of Poland, the botched allied invasion of Norway, Stalin's purges (USSR had the most proficient army before the purges).
Arg0n01 5 months ago
@Arg0n01 Well, WWII began when Poland was conquered, or while being conquered, so I won't say "unopposed", exactly. Well, the theory was, capture the oil fields, and demoralize the USSR far enough, they'd give up just as they had back in WWI. The Blitz tactic was demoralizing in general. What they didn't really count on was the tactics the Red Army used to counter the Blitz. Getting pinned-down back in Stalingrad didn't help either. They might have had a chance if they left Stalingrad.
Parham1995 5 months ago
@Parham1995 But they didn't have enough power to take the oilfields. The oil fields are in the Caucasus, and blitzkrieg is unfeasible in the mountains, the Soviets wear out the attackers so they can mount a strategic flank from Stalingrad, fairly simple thing happens to work. And what I meant unopposed was the fact that the wester allies of Poland didn't act even though they had an overwhelming numerical superiority on the west border on Germany (110 vs. 23 divisions, almost 5 times as much).
Arg0n01 5 months ago
@Arg0n01 Yes, that's right. They were in the Caucasus. It was a desperate attack, really. Look at in this way, the British had the Middle-East (well, most of it, that is). It was impossible to go there. The Red Army was known to be a very inferior force back then (after a frontier war, against the Finnish, I think?), and Hitler was as delusional as ever. I personally think (I'm probably wrong) that a speedy victory would have had been possible, if they had just Blitzed through.
Parham1995 4 months ago
@deathwalkerunited lol it did. For more than 5 times,hehe.
bartol1414 7 months ago
ONE M0:00RE TIME!
musto94 7 months ago 45
@musto94 100 M0:00RE TIME!!! :)
Warheartful 6 months ago
Die Deutschen haben tapfer und unerbitterlich gekämpft und haben es immerhin bis Stalingrad geschafft, welche Nation kann schon sowas von sich behaupten. Und das die Deutschen die schlimmsten Kriegsverbrechen begannen haben ist Quatsch, da die Russen wohl noch ein Stück schlimmer gehandelt haben. Lediglich die westlichen Mächte waren gut zu uns Deutschen, da wir auch gut zu Ihren Kriegsgefangenen waren.
123BeanJim 7 months ago
@123BeanJim die russen haben frei nach gleich mit gleich und feuer mit feuer bekämpfen gehandelt..stell du dir mal vor das eine fremde macht dein land besetzt, deine äcker zetritt, deine städte verbrennt , deine brüder und vorväter tötet und deine mutter und schwestern versklavt wenn nicht gar schlimmeres....ich glaube da währe jeder ein wenig angepisst und würde hart zurückschlagen.
Groger90 7 months ago
@123BeanJim Am Arsch. Die Deutschen, wie auch die Russen haben Kriegsverbrechen begangen. Da gibt es keine Ausnahme. Die Deutzschen haben gemordet und die Russen haben auch gemordet, als Antwort. Solange es Menschen gibt, wird es Kriege geben.
MrBanana281 7 months ago
God this song is badass.
InquisitorxSmith 7 months ago
Glory and honor to Great Soviet Army which free us from nazi !! (Respect from Czech Republic)
Loucenteam 8 months ago 4
@Loucenteam
well, the Soviet army was really great at the end of ww2. They also freed Poland from the nazis. Well, 5 years before they killed some thousand Polish soldiers at Katyn, and stood still during the Warsaw uprising...
But, still great army. But then came the communists, and they weren't great at all...
Apertus19 7 months ago
@Loucenteam Hmmmm, they did kick the "Nazis" out, but only to install their puppets, trade one dictatorship for another, not really much of a liberation. But eh, they were brave soldiers.
MauledWolf 7 months ago
@MauledWolf Brave indeed but without honour to treat simple people of those countries especialy women of germany which fell victim to the worst and the largest mass rape in the human history. Lets just skip pass the fate of german POWs which were either shot or sent to siberia(my own granfather participated in killing pows which was a coomon thing on eastern front) those things were happening cause war is war. Women took no part in this war but yet many of them fell victim to these russian hords
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago
@PolishWingedHussar10 Aye, I was mostly getting at the civillians who suffered at the hands of the Red Army, I just don't understand why people glorify them and the Soviets so much is all. They weren't liberators, they were just another form of oppressor.
MauledWolf 7 months ago
@MauledWolf The reason for that is just that they were the ones who bore brunt of major fighting and they engaged the largest body of german army. The westeners just never tasted the soviet rule and so they dont see anything wrong with them but infact they were just as cruel, merciless and murderous power as nazie germany or probably worse. Russians were cruel even in 1939 polish invasion, on-site POW and NCO executions in many places, mass murders, torturs and mass persecution of innocent poles
PolishWingedHussar10 7 months ago