Anbody watch the Transformers movies?? Why does the Primes look like this and the skull shapes and also they are embedded in the pyramides. Pretty crazuy stuff
this dude is right, but failed to connect that earth's moon is an artificial spacecraft that is chared all around it's surface from entering and re- entering the sun !! look up "moon theory" it's so obvious .. the moon is a spaceship that has been parked here, for repaires and meanwhile the u.f.o.'s are using their small ships to go to earth , in and out and back to the moon untill thier main ship is repaired ! and they are using manking to harvest raw materials needed 4 them !! get it !!
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
also remember that Nassim is a thinker... NOT a speaker/presenter. I like his style, but he loses most intellectuals because of the side tangents he goes off on. He's just so full of thoughts and seems to want to get it all out. I haven't come accross a more sensible unified field theory than this. It just seems right. But I'm not sure he can take credit for it, but he can take credit for compiling all this information into one lecture! Thank you Nassim! People are starting to get it!
@letmeseethat1 I take the opposite - he's a speaker, presenter and salesperson but not a thinker. He loses most intellectuals because they know the subjects he treats shoddily and can see everything he asserts is deeply flawed. As to a 'better' unified field theory, what's your definition of one? What are your standards of evidence? Is it 'it just seems right'? Be honest. Are you qualified to know intuitively what is eluding many of the greatest minds on the planet? I know I'm not.
@steeltable218 Well if hes a speaker/salesperson then he's absolutely horrible. I've heard almost every thing he's saying from credible sources. I know more than the average joe about physics. That's for sure. I believe we all have access to all knowledge. Its just what we allow ourselves to know, and which questions we are inquisitive enough to ask. I love watching this lecture and then Marco's lecture together. I'm not a big fan of scientific method. Its irrelevant at most levels.
@steeltable218 For an easy example. You can form a hypothesis that clouds are living creatures. Then do all kinds of studies and record all kinds of data. All leading you to the conclusion that your hypothesis was incorrect. Which may be true in 3D. However i've had multiple interactions with clouds while on mushrooms. Even with many of my friends there we can all interact with the clouds and see their geometrical electromagnetic structure. Now you have two conclusions. 3D and wholistic.
@letmeseethat1 "You can form a hypothesis that clouds are living creatures. Then do all kinds of studies and record all kinds of data. All leading you to the conclusion that your hypothesis was incorrect." That's fine and just stop there. Anything farther, you're courting mental disaster. Why posit higher dimensions when your studies show no evidence of them? But I've no doubt you've interacted with clouds while high and I'm sure it was amazing. What does 'wholistic' mean BTW?
@steeltable218 The point is that their are other dimensions, and if you can imagine something then it has to somehow somewhere be real. You cannot imagine that which does not somehow already exist. Existance is all that was and ever will be RIGHT NOW. By wholistic i mean taking into consideration all densities. How everything is actually a whole. That our small point of views are based on what we observe, and what is observed is based on the observer. Which makes a BOX, and we're in it.
@letmeseethat1 It's astonishing to say the scientific method is irrelevant at most levels, with it's real-life applications which you use every day, then believe that all we imagine has to be real somewhere - an idea with no application apart from being another notion stoners can enjoy. Okay, I imagine this... this reality has a firm border between fantasy and reality, the imagined is unreal. According to your position, this has to be true too. So which is it?
@steeltable218 I just explained basically in your terms that scientifc method is limited by the observer, and that we are very limited observers. Look at the quantom level... none of our laws really apply there... and everything we see is made of quantom particles... so really our laws only apply to US.
If you check out some of these skeptics & their friends they have built entire youtube channels debunking conspiracy theories, If conspiracy theories are so unbelievable why waste your time? go & debunk the Bible as there are a lot more people who believe in adam & eve & that the world is only 2000 years old. What is your agenda?
@MIKOLBZ But people do believe silly conspiracy theories.
If there's nonsense out there that lots of people are taken in by, some people feel that explaining what's nonsensical about it might be helpful. No agenda is needed, just (hopefully) some intelligence and human decency.
There are plenty of people busy 'debunking' the bible, you needn't worry about that.
It's human nature to want to discuss ideas and provide information, isn't it?
@TheBobathon "It's human nature to want to discuss ideas and provide information, isn't it?" very true, but I wish I could show you the youtube channels I saw & you'll see that they lack intelligence, and as for human decency, some were Nazi's
@MIKOLBZ I agree that there are agenda-driven Skeptics out there who automatically dismiss claims of Psi as impossible, e.g. biologist Rupert Sheldrake cites many examples of these manouverings. But simply pointing out errors that silly people like Nassim make in the foundations of their arguments is not an agenda, it's simply pointing out nonsense, and surely that's not a bad thing?
@steeltable218 Sure his math doesn't work out according to our modern mathematics, but that doens't mean that most of what hes saying isn't valid. He's just sharing a new view. It makes more sense that anything else i've come across. It rings true in many ways. I connected his theory w/ Marco Rodin's findings right away. What do you know, a year later they're working together. Have to be careful not to dismiss the 80 percent of valid info because of 20 percent speculation.
@letmeseethat1 If his math doesn't work according to modern mathematics, then what is it? Why call it maths? Why not 'Orangefluff'? Why even bother to use it if it doesn't work? And if his physics theory is based on math that doesn't work, how can 80% of the theory be valid? Please give me three instances of his 'valid' info that is demonstrable, predictive, testable and makes basic sense. I'll be fair, I'll check it out. I'm not surpised that he and Rodin are working together, either.
@steeltable218 I think i failed to get my point across. He isn't really bringing anything new to the table in my opinion. He does go off on some side tangents that are irrelevant to the immediate theory he's proposing. Now! He does a GREAT job of taking others work (some of which he claims he concluded on his own) and compilies it all together to make a semi-solid grand unified field theory that makes more sense than any others proposed. If you have a link to a better theory let me know.
@MIKOLBZ Dude. The whole debunk is that he didn't get a degree from a school, and that 1.168 is not equal to phi ratio. What Nassim does is by mathematical standards incorrect. But by logical standards it makes pefect sense. If you get the answer 3.14xxxxxx to an equation then can you say that equation is equal to pi? Because 3.14=pi=3.14. Well, yes... and no. Other than this everything makes sense, and most of it is old information form more credible sources.
@letmeseethat1 Cheers for that mate, Ive been watching a lot of programs on consciousness/ Reality, Physics/ Quantum mechanics & I see a lot of professionals talking about things I have heard Nasim Harramein talk about but never do the programs look at how other peoples theories can relate to each other. He is the only person i know of brave enough to unify theories & stepping out of the sandbox, I dont imagine he's 100% correct but who is?
@letmeseethat1 yeah, i agree with you. he tried to force phi into planks length where it didn't really fit or have any significance. but mostly aside from that everything he presents is highly interesting
Brilliant ideas about sunspots!!,BUT his alien-sun-god-ancestors World View (inspired by crop design artists -see 11/45,12/45,13/45) suggests paltry evidence. This fascinating provoking alien-sun-god ancestor story is at odds with fact that DNA has been analized to the point of revealing intricate degrees of racial drift .The scientific response to his brilliant Creation Theory put out in 2003? None that I could find. Maybe it got clouded over by his theory of alien-sun-god-ancestors.
Roberta, when you go to every part of the conference and paste the same thing over and over again, it's not just an opinion, is a pattern, you then have a motiv, an agenda... That, bobby, gives him more credit.
Human DNA has been analzed to point of revealing intricate degrees of racial drift, there just is no evidence for giant alien-Sun gods. Early man would surely recognise the importance of sunlight on life, reasonably to the point of worship. His ideas on blackholes and sunspots are brilliant!, but his evolved alien-world-view( inspired by the crop design artists,see 11/45,12/45,13/45) has led him into this alien- sun-gate theory, fascinating, but obscurs his brilliant Creation Theory.
Logical, you use the fabric of the universe ( the holes) to push away from and come out on the other side, depending on your state. But how are those routes created ?
Anbody watch the Transformers movies?? Why does the Primes look like this and the skull shapes and also they are embedded in the pyramides. Pretty crazuy stuff
2girly 1 week ago
Lol...why would the other side of the galaxy be a 'higher realm', what do you mean by higher?
hesaidthefollowing 3 months ago
this dude is right, but failed to connect that earth's moon is an artificial spacecraft that is chared all around it's surface from entering and re- entering the sun !! look up "moon theory" it's so obvious .. the moon is a spaceship that has been parked here, for repaires and meanwhile the u.f.o.'s are using their small ships to go to earth , in and out and back to the moon untill thier main ship is repaired ! and they are using manking to harvest raw materials needed 4 them !! get it !!
outlawmlo7 3 months ago in playlist Nassim Sun Theory
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 4 months ago
5:40 Disneys movie "Treasure planet".
ikemkrueger 5 months ago
This sure does change my perspective on existence.
drugaddict1235 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
what would carl sagon say about this
wic213 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
humm what would carl sagon think about this ?
wic213 1 year ago
Comment removed
wic213 1 year ago
also remember that Nassim is a thinker... NOT a speaker/presenter. I like his style, but he loses most intellectuals because of the side tangents he goes off on. He's just so full of thoughts and seems to want to get it all out. I haven't come accross a more sensible unified field theory than this. It just seems right. But I'm not sure he can take credit for it, but he can take credit for compiling all this information into one lecture! Thank you Nassim! People are starting to get it!
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 I take the opposite - he's a speaker, presenter and salesperson but not a thinker. He loses most intellectuals because they know the subjects he treats shoddily and can see everything he asserts is deeply flawed. As to a 'better' unified field theory, what's your definition of one? What are your standards of evidence? Is it 'it just seems right'? Be honest. Are you qualified to know intuitively what is eluding many of the greatest minds on the planet? I know I'm not.
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 Well if hes a speaker/salesperson then he's absolutely horrible. I've heard almost every thing he's saying from credible sources. I know more than the average joe about physics. That's for sure. I believe we all have access to all knowledge. Its just what we allow ourselves to know, and which questions we are inquisitive enough to ask. I love watching this lecture and then Marco's lecture together. I'm not a big fan of scientific method. Its irrelevant at most levels.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@steeltable218 For an easy example. You can form a hypothesis that clouds are living creatures. Then do all kinds of studies and record all kinds of data. All leading you to the conclusion that your hypothesis was incorrect. Which may be true in 3D. However i've had multiple interactions with clouds while on mushrooms. Even with many of my friends there we can all interact with the clouds and see their geometrical electromagnetic structure. Now you have two conclusions. 3D and wholistic.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 "You can form a hypothesis that clouds are living creatures. Then do all kinds of studies and record all kinds of data. All leading you to the conclusion that your hypothesis was incorrect." That's fine and just stop there. Anything farther, you're courting mental disaster. Why posit higher dimensions when your studies show no evidence of them? But I've no doubt you've interacted with clouds while high and I'm sure it was amazing. What does 'wholistic' mean BTW?
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 The point is that their are other dimensions, and if you can imagine something then it has to somehow somewhere be real. You cannot imagine that which does not somehow already exist. Existance is all that was and ever will be RIGHT NOW. By wholistic i mean taking into consideration all densities. How everything is actually a whole. That our small point of views are based on what we observe, and what is observed is based on the observer. Which makes a BOX, and we're in it.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 It's astonishing to say the scientific method is irrelevant at most levels, with it's real-life applications which you use every day, then believe that all we imagine has to be real somewhere - an idea with no application apart from being another notion stoners can enjoy. Okay, I imagine this... this reality has a firm border between fantasy and reality, the imagined is unreal. According to your position, this has to be true too. So which is it?
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 I just explained basically in your terms that scientifc method is limited by the observer, and that we are very limited observers. Look at the quantom level... none of our laws really apply there... and everything we see is made of quantom particles... so really our laws only apply to US.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
try ashayana deane viedo on tou tube.
MrTopcat3333 1 year ago
this is so intresting it makes me want to be an archeoligyst!
tissetatten 1 year ago
Nasseim! What a lovely bloke ;o)
888Quetzalcoatl888 1 year ago
stargate
giddygiddy85 1 year ago
If you check out some of these skeptics & their friends they have built entire youtube channels debunking conspiracy theories, If conspiracy theories are so unbelievable why waste your time? go & debunk the Bible as there are a lot more people who believe in adam & eve & that the world is only 2000 years old. What is your agenda?
MIKOLBZ 1 year ago
@MIKOLBZ But people do believe silly conspiracy theories.
If there's nonsense out there that lots of people are taken in by, some people feel that explaining what's nonsensical about it might be helpful. No agenda is needed, just (hopefully) some intelligence and human decency.
There are plenty of people busy 'debunking' the bible, you needn't worry about that.
It's human nature to want to discuss ideas and provide information, isn't it?
TheBobathon 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheBobathon "It's human nature to want to discuss ideas and provide information, isn't it?" very true, but I wish I could show you the youtube channels I saw & you'll see that they lack intelligence, and as for human decency, some were Nazi's
MIKOLBZ 1 year ago
@MIKOLBZ I agree that there are agenda-driven Skeptics out there who automatically dismiss claims of Psi as impossible, e.g. biologist Rupert Sheldrake cites many examples of these manouverings. But simply pointing out errors that silly people like Nassim make in the foundations of their arguments is not an agenda, it's simply pointing out nonsense, and surely that's not a bad thing?
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 Sure his math doesn't work out according to our modern mathematics, but that doens't mean that most of what hes saying isn't valid. He's just sharing a new view. It makes more sense that anything else i've come across. It rings true in many ways. I connected his theory w/ Marco Rodin's findings right away. What do you know, a year later they're working together. Have to be careful not to dismiss the 80 percent of valid info because of 20 percent speculation.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 If his math doesn't work according to modern mathematics, then what is it? Why call it maths? Why not 'Orangefluff'? Why even bother to use it if it doesn't work? And if his physics theory is based on math that doesn't work, how can 80% of the theory be valid? Please give me three instances of his 'valid' info that is demonstrable, predictive, testable and makes basic sense. I'll be fair, I'll check it out. I'm not surpised that he and Rodin are working together, either.
steeltable218 1 year ago
@steeltable218 I think i failed to get my point across. He isn't really bringing anything new to the table in my opinion. He does go off on some side tangents that are irrelevant to the immediate theory he's proposing. Now! He does a GREAT job of taking others work (some of which he claims he concluded on his own) and compilies it all together to make a semi-solid grand unified field theory that makes more sense than any others proposed. If you have a link to a better theory let me know.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@MIKOLBZ Dude. The whole debunk is that he didn't get a degree from a school, and that 1.168 is not equal to phi ratio. What Nassim does is by mathematical standards incorrect. But by logical standards it makes pefect sense. If you get the answer 3.14xxxxxx to an equation then can you say that equation is equal to pi? Because 3.14=pi=3.14. Well, yes... and no. Other than this everything makes sense, and most of it is old information form more credible sources.
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 Cheers for that mate, Ive been watching a lot of programs on consciousness/ Reality, Physics/ Quantum mechanics & I see a lot of professionals talking about things I have heard Nasim Harramein talk about but never do the programs look at how other peoples theories can relate to each other. He is the only person i know of brave enough to unify theories & stepping out of the sandbox, I dont imagine he's 100% correct but who is?
MIKOLBZ 1 year ago
@letmeseethat1 yeah, i agree with you. he tried to force phi into planks length where it didn't really fit or have any significance. but mostly aside from that everything he presents is highly interesting
thirdeyeblind3 1 year ago
@thirdeyeblind3 And you don't find this undergraduate-level slip-up telling of his entire scientific/mathematical ability?
steeltable218 1 year ago
the whole video is 8 hours actually. and im probably lazier than most.
ive watched the whole presentation at least a dozen times. :P
inflateablesoulmate 1 year ago
all makes sense to me, is like in a way I know already!!!
belsiiavila 2 years ago 14
@belsiiavila youv prolly seen it in cartoons and space movies
tissetatten 1 year ago
I am very interested in this guys work, but I am to lazy to watch 5 hours of this
MultiIPwnage 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Brilliant ideas about sunspots!!,BUT his alien-sun-god-ancestors World View (inspired by crop design artists -see 11/45,12/45,13/45) suggests paltry evidence. This fascinating provoking alien-sun-god ancestor story is at odds with fact that DNA has been analized to the point of revealing intricate degrees of racial drift .The scientific response to his brilliant Creation Theory put out in 2003? None that I could find. Maybe it got clouded over by his theory of alien-sun-god-ancestors.
RobertaPeck 2 years ago
Roberta, when you go to every part of the conference and paste the same thing over and over again, it's not just an opinion, is a pattern, you then have a motiv, an agenda... That, bobby, gives him more credit.
iluvj00 2 years ago 8
I agree, shes is spamming the hell out of these videos. Perhaps, Nassim is striking a chord in the hearts of skeptics.
bedesoner 2 years ago
@iluvj00 bob is a pest isn't he
thirdeyeblind3 1 year ago
@iluvj00 bob is a pest isn't he, i wish i could double like this
thirdeyeblind3 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Human DNA has been analzed to point of revealing intricate degrees of racial drift, there just is no evidence for giant alien-Sun gods. Early man would surely recognise the importance of sunlight on life, reasonably to the point of worship. His ideas on blackholes and sunspots are brilliant!, but his evolved alien-world-view( inspired by the crop design artists,see 11/45,12/45,13/45) has led him into this alien- sun-gate theory, fascinating, but obscurs his brilliant Creation Theory.
RobertaPeck 2 years ago
are we descendants of these sun gods?
mibambino2007 2 years ago
Yes.
101408blogspot 2 years ago
Yes
Julissa279 2 years ago
I think we arent direct descendands. Israelis suppose to be 'cause they "married their wives"
drekecdrekecadrekecu 2 years ago
Logical, you use the fabric of the universe ( the holes) to push away from and come out on the other side, depending on your state. But how are those routes created ?
SomeUser9753 2 years ago
Comment removed
letmeseethat1 1 year ago
How does a machine look like, than can fly trough a sun spot.....
wow..
Amazing!
eneaenea9 3 years ago