@kougermasterz Yes, But what about the testimonys that said the ship did not split. and there is also new evidence saying she started to split at about 10 degrees but wasnt as bad...
@Films0R0Us Some of those testimonies were influenced by the White Star Line. Very few people actually saw the ship split because there was absolutely no light whatsoever at the time of the break. Some thought the loud cracking noises were the boilers crashing forward through the ship, which is absurd. You have to look into what people said during the investigations and afterward, not just accept "I didn't see the ship break."
@Films0R0Us The power was severed and the lights went out immediately before the ship started to break. By the time people's eyes had the chance to adjust, the ship was appearing to "right itself" before it finally sank a few moments later.
@kougermasterz the lights were going on and off throughout the entire time. And what i said earlier. There is new evidence that the breakup started MUCH earlier then once thought.
Would she have broke apart like that, she would have sunk much faster than she did. The estimated time it took for Titanic to sink was 2 hours and 30 - 40 minutes. But with THIS whe would have went under in under an hour for sure
@skrivbok well, if she went like we think until about 1:30 and broke like this about 1:30 am, she would have taken a while to sink up till this moment, then she would plunge straight down
If this happend, there would be no dubt about Titanic braking apart! Everyone in the lifeboats would have seen it happen! Science is one thing but the survivors were there, they saw what realy happend! Just because they are all gone now, does not make it right to put their accounts aside. Science may say it could not have happend, but believe it or not, it did!
Biggest nonsense. That new theory is false and its stupid to continue with it.
The bow was already under at 1:30, and water was at deck B. The break-up was around 2:18,
so this is wrong wrong wrong. History Channel? PFah!! those scientists think they know everything. Titanic cannot have broken at a shallow angle. and surely not so early!
this is so wrong. The ship broke at a high angle period. The guys in the documentary believe science can PROVE how exactly the ship sank. That's not the case.The survivors give the true account since they were THERE TO WITNESS IT! They said the ship sank at a high angle and I believe them.
It was VERY dark when she broke apart, and some survivors' eyes would not have adjusted enough to see it. As I stated, the ship broke apart AFTER the lights went out. But most of them have adjusted quickly to the dark that's why they reported what they saw.
4.) Eyewitness testimony reported the stern section "fell back on an even keel", "righted itself", "floated". The bottom-up breaking would have made it impossible for the stern section to right itself.
5.) If the ship broke up from the keel upwards, then the so-called "third piece" would have been mangled.
There were reasons why I don't believe the shallow angle theory...
1.) If the ship broke early in the sinking, the passengers who were either somewhere close or in that EXACT spot would be caught by surprise. Nothing like that was mentioned in the eyewitness testimony...
2.) Those in the lifeboats reported the ship breaking in two when the stern was up in the air...
3.) The lights were still on. Those in the lifeboats reported that the lights went out BEFORE the ship broke.
@SorianoYuri Yes maybe your right,But if Titanic did brake in high angle,then how you explain why some passangers didnt see titanic braker up?it would be totaly wierd to dont see how large ship broke in 2 piece.But if it did broke in shallow angle it does explain.
@zukaang12 the ship may have cracked below the surface. therefore, survivors would have a hard time to see it. some survivors said the ship split at a high angle. yes angle at about 30 degrees but some didnt see a splash. therefore, the ships stern may have not fell ALL the way into the water like in the movie
This might be a wrong theory indeed, but this rendering is the best ever seen. I believe this is the way the lights were dim, not as white as depicted everywhere else.
I think this was wrong... because... as you noe that time Titanic sank was at night, so if it sank like this, people wont saw it cleary... but if the stern was at high angle and breaks, maybe people may saw it breaks. =]
@MrUrfacetacos1 I think you're right. I don't think the ship would have split so early in the sinking, or at least so visibly. Perhaps the ship was breaking up inside, but it wasn't visible from the lifeboats. Then, the bow sank, very fast, and the ship broke in two at that moment.
I'm going to go with what the actual Eye-Witness's saw. Almost every one of them remembering the ship going up to a almost 40 degree angle before splitting in two.
@sweetnessboy1 That is not true. Actually, some people said they could just see the propellers out of the water, and then the ship swerved. But we don't know if the swerve resulted from the breaking up or if it was before the ship's breaking up. Personally, I believe the swerve was after the breaking-up. I don't think that people would have talked of a swerve it the ship had risen slowly into the air to reach that 45 degrees angle. And the ship would not have put up with that high angle.
A lot of the survivors saw that the Titanic went at a high angle but they believed the ship went down intact but in 1985 it was revealed that the ship broke in half so then we believed that the Titanic went to a high angle and then the ship broke. Now with this new information about the piece of the ships bottom they now say that the ship broke at a shallow angle.
So Now I'm totally lost of what actually happened but its still sad that all those 1500 people died. RIP to all who died.
Why is Titanic's bow not sinking by the head?!?!?!? They said "As she goes down by the HEAD, The water will go over the next bulkhead, and the next, and so on." So I do understand that the bow was curved at the bottom in 1 of the pic's underwater behind it, but they said it went down by the head and they can see the ship sinking becuz of the lights. Read A Night To Remember. Then u will know what I'm talking about.
i understand why the ship spilt like that, but what i dont understand is that why was the bow of titanic power isnt off and why its sticking up in the air? good video man!!
it's indeed not true. A ship like Titanic could never break at this angle
PokeworksStudios 1 week ago
This is ridiculous. The ship broke immediately after the base of the first funnel went under at 2:18.
kougermasterz 3 weeks ago
@kougermasterz were you there? no
Films0R0Us 1 week ago
@Films0R0Us What a silly, irrelevant comment. It's called evidence and witness testimony.
kougermasterz 1 week ago
@kougermasterz Yes, But what about the testimonys that said the ship did not split. and there is also new evidence saying she started to split at about 10 degrees but wasnt as bad...
Films0R0Us 1 week ago
@Films0R0Us Some of those testimonies were influenced by the White Star Line. Very few people actually saw the ship split because there was absolutely no light whatsoever at the time of the break. Some thought the loud cracking noises were the boilers crashing forward through the ship, which is absurd. You have to look into what people said during the investigations and afterward, not just accept "I didn't see the ship break."
kougermasterz 1 week ago
@Films0R0Us The power was severed and the lights went out immediately before the ship started to break. By the time people's eyes had the chance to adjust, the ship was appearing to "right itself" before it finally sank a few moments later.
kougermasterz 1 week ago
@kougermasterz the lights were going on and off throughout the entire time. And what i said earlier. There is new evidence that the breakup started MUCH earlier then once thought.
Films0R0Us 1 week ago
Also the lights would shut shut off when the ship breaks so this is also nosense
thetitanicsinking 3 weeks ago
Would she have broke apart like that, she would have sunk much faster than she did. The estimated time it took for Titanic to sink was 2 hours and 30 - 40 minutes. But with THIS whe would have went under in under an hour for sure
skrivbok 3 weeks ago
@skrivbok well, if she went like we think until about 1:30 and broke like this about 1:30 am, she would have taken a while to sink up till this moment, then she would plunge straight down
Davis4037 3 weeks ago
This is the scene from the titanic game on the wii not discovery or some other show. So this is mostly incorrect.
cunardBigLusy 1 month ago
If this happend, there would be no dubt about Titanic braking apart! Everyone in the lifeboats would have seen it happen! Science is one thing but the survivors were there, they saw what realy happend! Just because they are all gone now, does not make it right to put their accounts aside. Science may say it could not have happend, but believe it or not, it did!
evenlittle 1 month ago
ok thennn..
jennastep426 1 month ago
FUCK THIS VIDEO! TITANIC DID NOT SINK LIKE THAT! SHUT UP AND DELETE IT
chimto1234 1 month ago
Biggest nonsense. That new theory is false and its stupid to continue with it.
The bow was already under at 1:30, and water was at deck B. The break-up was around 2:18,
so this is wrong wrong wrong. History Channel? PFah!! those scientists think they know everything. Titanic cannot have broken at a shallow angle. and surely not so early!
Firemarioflower 2 months ago
why not? its possible
TheTheNichtkomisch 2 months ago
hey i played that game i finished it ah good times
bwpsbestfriend 2 months ago
...Only will not hate on this because it came from Titanic: Adventure out of Time, quite possibly the best game EVER.
MelancholyRequiem 2 months ago
thats FROM A GAME!
pinoyboys12 2 months ago
This doesn't really so much
titanascar 2 months ago
this is so wrong. The ship broke at a high angle period. The guys in the documentary believe science can PROVE how exactly the ship sank. That's not the case.The survivors give the true account since they were THERE TO WITNESS IT! They said the ship sank at a high angle and I believe them.
MrRocha90 2 months ago
@zukaang12
It was VERY dark when she broke apart, and some survivors' eyes would not have adjusted enough to see it. As I stated, the ship broke apart AFTER the lights went out. But most of them have adjusted quickly to the dark that's why they reported what they saw.
SorianoYuri 3 months ago
good sound/music
xXHENCHMANNXx 3 months ago
@rapidnadion wheres more titanic splitting videos?
ReptigloRand 3 months ago
cont...
4.) Eyewitness testimony reported the stern section "fell back on an even keel", "righted itself", "floated". The bottom-up breaking would have made it impossible for the stern section to right itself.
5.) If the ship broke up from the keel upwards, then the so-called "third piece" would have been mangled.
Please correct me if I'm wrong on some points...
SorianoYuri 3 months ago
@SorianoYuri the shallow angle theory is wrong, at 1:30 am there was still many survivors on titanic and even them in lifeboats would have seen this.
numba1danman 3 months ago
@numba1danman I know that...that's why I believe it's wrong...
SorianoYuri 3 months ago
@SorianoYuri ahhhh kkkkkkk my bad...im glad we are unite in our belief that titanic sank at a high angle...godd day to u sir.
numba1danman 3 months ago
@numba1danman good day also...i'm actually making a flash movie of the sinking of the Titanic...it's due for release next year...
SorianoYuri 3 months ago
There were reasons why I don't believe the shallow angle theory...
1.) If the ship broke early in the sinking, the passengers who were either somewhere close or in that EXACT spot would be caught by surprise. Nothing like that was mentioned in the eyewitness testimony...
2.) Those in the lifeboats reported the ship breaking in two when the stern was up in the air...
3.) The lights were still on. Those in the lifeboats reported that the lights went out BEFORE the ship broke.
SorianoYuri 3 months ago
@SorianoYuri Yes maybe your right,But if Titanic did brake in high angle,then how you explain why some passangers didnt see titanic braker up?it would be totaly wierd to dont see how large ship broke in 2 piece.But if it did broke in shallow angle it does explain.
zukaang12 3 months ago
@zukaang12 the ship may have cracked below the surface. therefore, survivors would have a hard time to see it. some survivors said the ship split at a high angle. yes angle at about 30 degrees but some didnt see a splash. therefore, the ships stern may have not fell ALL the way into the water like in the movie
thweepz 2 months ago
This might be a wrong theory indeed, but this rendering is the best ever seen. I believe this is the way the lights were dim, not as white as depicted everywhere else.
EddyNicolay 4 months ago
She didn't broke like that.
xTitanicPicx 4 months ago
I think this was wrong... because... as you noe that time Titanic sank was at night, so if it sank like this, people wont saw it cleary... but if the stern was at high angle and breaks, maybe people may saw it breaks. =]
AndrewMushmom 4 months ago
I dont think the ship sank like that...
universileezra 4 months ago
There are to many holes in this break up. If she sank like that
1. People on the Titanic could tell the difference.
2. People in the lifeboat would have clearly seen the high stern and low bow.
3. The power would have failed soon than it did cause water would be coming into the area where the electrical stuff was.
This break up goes against eye-witness account and I don't believe it in the least.
MrUrfacetacos1 4 months ago
@MrUrfacetacos1 I think you're right. I don't think the ship would have split so early in the sinking, or at least so visibly. Perhaps the ship was breaking up inside, but it wasn't visible from the lifeboats. Then, the bow sank, very fast, and the ship broke in two at that moment.
Nicomurgia 4 months ago
Titanic Breakup Failture: Sagging Titanic's Hull
stellaruniversexmpls 4 months ago
@stellaruniversexmpls It is quite similar, isn't it? We don't believe anything like this condition happened, but it's interesting to see.
Rapidnadion 3 months ago
I'm going to go with what the actual Eye-Witness's saw. Almost every one of them remembering the ship going up to a almost 40 degree angle before splitting in two.
sweetnessboy1 4 months ago
@sweetnessboy1 That is not true. Actually, some people said they could just see the propellers out of the water, and then the ship swerved. But we don't know if the swerve resulted from the breaking up or if it was before the ship's breaking up. Personally, I believe the swerve was after the breaking-up. I don't think that people would have talked of a swerve it the ship had risen slowly into the air to reach that 45 degrees angle. And the ship would not have put up with that high angle.
Nicomurgia 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A lot of the survivors saw that the Titanic went at a high angle but they believed the ship went down intact but in 1985 it was revealed that the ship broke in half so then we believed that the Titanic went to a high angle and then the ship broke. Now with this new information about the piece of the ships bottom they now say that the ship broke at a shallow angle.
So Now I'm totally lost of what actually happened but its still sad that all those 1500 people died. RIP to all who died.
DanielHami23 4 months ago
thats a sagging hull
alex20001912 4 months ago
Why is Titanic's bow not sinking by the head?!?!?!? They said "As she goes down by the HEAD, The water will go over the next bulkhead, and the next, and so on." So I do understand that the bow was curved at the bottom in 1 of the pic's underwater behind it, but they said it went down by the head and they can see the ship sinking becuz of the lights. Read A Night To Remember. Then u will know what I'm talking about.
cunardBigLusy 4 months ago
@cunardBigLusy it was made by the history channel. but it did start splitting at the time da bow just went underwater.
quintanafaj2009 4 months ago
i understand why the ship spilt like that, but what i dont understand is that why was the bow of titanic power isnt off and why its sticking up in the air? good video man!!
titanicposeidonfan12 5 months ago