Added: 3 years ago
From: awaresilence
Views: 81,263
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (25)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hardcore

    

  • This is sacred temple dancing - a very simple form, yet beautiful.

    Through this dance, one can see other dances taking form.

    One can see angels and other sentient forces.

    Lovely.

  • And then they all commited suicide. Crazy dancing sects are bad, mkay

  • It is easy to scoff - it takes more effort to understand

  • tell me one person who has ever lived who was NOT a prophet.....this is pretentious bullshit

  • I used to do these dances . This is a good representation .

  • @elauadeinsf What do they mean?

  • @henjokongo

    It is about attention and the presence of the body. We often go through life without knowing of the harmony, rather great harmony in which physical, emotional and mental are the ' parts '. The ancient Essenes and other initiates all did things with knowledge of our three bodies, reference to this is made more often than you would think. Today I feel this knowledge has been mostly lost.

  • It's about attention. If I am engaged in doing the movement exactly, is there a moment, when, even as the position changes, something is engaged, something is watching, and at the same time, an acute, seperate, impartial awareness, of how totaly I am normaly governed by impulse, with no filter to sort threw anything, because"I" am not there, most of the time. Each must find they're own. But conditiond can help.

  • @TIMOGO3 rofl ur can spout some pure bullshit

  • Beautiful! Thank you for sharing.

  • at least more charming accuracy than the dull core*O*graphics the nazis did at reichsparteitag in good ole nuremberg ;-))

    nice try!

  • Now that's what I call square dancing :P

  • I think that technically Buddha would be a seer, rather than a prophet. If you assume that a prophet is a voice piece for the divine, the Buddha only claimed to reported what he had seen. There were a few times, though where he did function prophetically, like bringing through Avalochteshvara when reciting the Heart Sutra. I think in G's use all of them are sources of divine wisdom that the movements are trying to invoke.

  • technotony1227, I disagree with you by not mentioning Gautama Buddha and Brahma are not a prophet! How do you know that they aren't prophet? Do you know how many prophets(asa) Passed? 124000 Prophets passed aways, so therefore Buddha and Brahma is one of them but they haven't receive revelation. Only 5 famouse prophets receive revelation.

  • MONTANA, Gautama the Buddha never claimed himself to be ONE..that itself is ENOUGH to know that he wasnt...

    He was an ANTI PROPHET

  • who makes them to be prophets? man or god? just like modern day rock stars.

  • the four prophets. the word belongs to a judaic messianic tradition, so it fits well for christ and mohamed.

    buddha and brahma in no way were prophets. but i can see osho using the term loosely.

  • beautiful. i miss my times in pune...

    btw, they should say christ in the original greek (kristos), not in english. seriously.

  • YES!!!!!!!!! that's how it was supposed to be... I really don't get why they would change that? the power lies in the syllables!!!

  • This one is my favourite. :)

  • When you think about it: the chances of any group of people getting any good at the Movements before they get tired of doing them, tired of each other, tired of the teacher, and etc . . . are actually incredibly small.

  • Not Osho's version, but some of his sannyasins'.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more