Look at the windbags math of global warming vs economic cost to humans.
If you have not already viewed this clip of bogus mathematics LORD Monckton type this in the you tube search engine "Lord Monckton VS Al Gore/UN On Theory Of Global Warming" on Glenn Beck...another piece of work. Apparently there is a new mathematical unit in climate science known as "tonnes/ppm", which equates to mass over concentration, mathematical bullshit with a 3 piece suit.
@mittedom That is why he is dangerous, he rotates around using science to try to prove his point and then attempts to disprove thousands of competent scientists and scientific method as nonsense. To put it simply this LORD is a lying pompous windbag, who has been proven wrong on many occasions on record, and when contronted with it gets absolutely rude and angry in his response to the evidence against his claims.
Please watch this dissection of Monckton's credibility and claims about global warming. If you are inclined to believe Monckton you'll be likely to dismiss it, but please watch it to know about criticisms directed towards him. It's made by a journalist with a science degree in geology. watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM&feature=BFa&list=PL8E2FEA64D20EC9AF&lf=results_main
Just in case anyone still takes this liar and fraudster seriously, visit the UK Parliament website. The clerk to the parliaments posted a letter to Lord Monckton reminding him that he is NOT a member of the House of Lords, and once again asked him to desist with his false claim.
@widebody123 btw what does that have to do with anything?!!! He's still making the arguments!!!!! Douche bag even if he wasn't a Lord he still has the education and shit!!!
@brandalisms no lord monckton is not sacha baron cohen. it really was lord monckton in the chaser's sketch but no, it's not sacha cohen. read this, i thought it was sacha too lol! type in lord monckton in google and chasers and you shuld get some articles about it. chasers totally fooled gullible ppl like me.
This man is great because he gets to the bottom of climate issues. So carbon dioxide is not the issue and thus not the way to wreck the economies of the world to control a minor problem.
Seriously? You truly believe that Lord Monckton is Sacha Baron Cohen? This man has been around longer than Sacha Baron Cohen has lived and its an impossible task for ANY make-up artist to alter his physiognomy to such an extent without plastic surgery. When you want to make a valid point, make sure you don't resort to name calling as it makes you look like stupid and incompetent.
monkton is a liar, when he says "check my sources" do so, they nearly all come from papers SUPPORTING GW if he thought GW was untrue why is he using lies if he knows any truth to back him up. Also consider his regard for you, he encourages you to check his sources presuming you won't. Never had a peer reviewed paper published was never thatchers advisor on anything and has zero qualifications to pontificate on this subject whereas 99+% of those who do say he is wrong, a shill sham shitehawk
Amazing how Americans have given so much attention to Monckton the LIAR.
There are tons of info discrediting him, associating him with the billionaire Koch brothers who have been spending loads of money onn the denialism propaganda.
@sunamori6765 Lord Monckton is a statistical annalist and a mathematician. It is no secret that he was hired by the Koch's to research the Anthropogenic Global Warming phenomenon. Through his numerous contacts from within the international, scientific and academic community he has drawn the conclusions exhibited here. Don't fall back on petty abuse. Put your arguments to the contrary to him directly. Don't be shy He would welcome the debate. Put up or shut up.
so does this mean we don't have to pay green taxes any more? no, the mass population are still in ignorance and they're ploughing ahead with the whole scam, aided and abetted by the EU's centralized fascist control
damnlazyfuk your so paranoid you really think that your highest chance of getting aids is from other people trying to live there life and not some goverment or corperation dumping it in youre water supply? they made the damn thing wich mean a cure had to be invented first, not to mention there are things out there that do fight it if they were in high enough abundence it isnt imposible that it could be overcome ..i bet you dont even no how to cure cancer quarantined for the pursope of research
Monckton is NOT a member of the House of Lords. The clerk of the parliaments recently made a point of publishing a letter to that effect on the uk parliament website. He is a blatant charlatan ( although most entertaining).
If polar bears are dying all over the place, then why don't the climate change advocates show us the bodies: ones that have not be bludgeoned by poachers.I would not buy a used car from that zionist Al Gore let alone let him convince me that the world is going to implode from climate change.Wake up sheeople!!!!!!!! Advocates of climate change have already set up an elaborate trading scheme using carbon credits and will make a killing.On the other hand Monckton has nothing to gain monitarily.
@mishmiaoul - Good points. Speaking at the Aspen Institute on August 4, 2011, Al Gore became unhinged, bemoaning the fact that there’s no longer a “shared reality on climate even though the very existence of our civilization is at stake.” Complaining that audiences are pushing back and asking tough questions, Gore unleashed a torrent of profanity during his talk. Gore is clearly distraught that he and his comrades are loosing the debate on global warming. And this guy won the Nobel Prize?
"... it is all interesting (Monckton's background) ... " ??
He is a charlatan. Non-scientist, not a Margaret Thatcher advisor (his name is not mentioned once in her 900 page biography), not a member of the House of Lords. Monckton is entitled to use a fading British title because his old man had one. He is not an elected politician. He is not a mathemetician. He has a classics degree and a "diploma in journalism". He is a nobody, in every sense of the word.
@SuperJane99 He told in the video you half wit. Latin, the language of the Roman Empire which was the empire in control of the region were Jesus lived, was the actual language the Jesus spoke. Historical fact.
Good on you Christopher Monckton. Big banks want carbon trading and DEBT. Truth is we heading for another LIA event which will be caused by suns diminishing sunspots as predicted by US solar observatory some years back.
Come on people, stop with the personal attacks and insinuations against this man. There are many scientists and politicans who I gravely dislike, but I still listen to their views and treat them with the appropriate respect. As individuals, we all have different views and understanding's of different subject matters, whether we agree or not. There is nothing ever to be gained, regardless of how you justify it, by attacking people who hold a different view from you're own.
@OSS732 watch Lord Monckton Bunkum by potholer54. He has 5 videos showing how Monckton is falsifying data, misquoting and misleading his followers. Unlike Monckton, Potholer cites 100% of his sources and also shows you where you can read the sources Monckton quotes from so you can see his dishonesty for yourself.
all you can do is attack how they guy looks but not the facts that are out there to find , why was there more co2 in the air a thousand years ago than today answer to that, oh sorry you don't know huh well i guess you better figure it out before you tax us huh huh wouldnt that be a good idea and while your at figure figure why we had a medieval warming than it was today but you know i could tell you right here , its the sun , its fluctuates and is not completely constant temp duh
Monckton's, Moses to the dimwitted Denialist movement.
""there is only one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and to quarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the population should be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with the virus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, and permanently."
@Harboggles Go to amazon, type in "Christopher Monckton." There are books published by him from the 1980's. It is not Borat. You are and the rest of the world were fooled. It's okay.
@craigthe3rd Just did. Theres no images of the book or anything. His Wikipedia page is incredibly detailed and the man speaks with the same intelligence level as Sacha (who is a genius) and you can tell in the way he phrases himself that he doesn't really belive what he is saying and it is obviously satire.
@Harboggles His eye condition alone should be enough for you to realize it couldn't possibly be Sacha. There isn't a makeup artist in the world capable of doing that.
The biggest giveaway tho, is that THIS ISN'T FUNNY. Not even slightly...
Think what you want tho, I'm done arguing with you. You'll realize soon enough.
@Harboggles I don't have to google it because it is not Borat. It is just some crazy ass politician. How the hell would Borat make his eyes look like that?
"The ROTHSCHILD Banking MAFIA are the instigators of this huge tax scam !!! - - David Mayer DeRothschild is the public face and main pusher of the man made global warming lies... oops I mean "Climate Change" oh yes it's "climate change" now isn't it !!!
These liberal do-gooders will believe anything. If you told them that pigs could fly they would probably believe it. Man-made global warming is absolute bollocks in every sense of the word, PERIOD!
@MegaPostman77 you are just another uninform idoit who thinks he know it all. please show me the scientific peer review publications to support your claim or please shut up. your belief is ignorant and dangerous
@MegaPostman77 and obviously you'll believe anything just like they will. Have you read the scientific journals on Global Warming or looked into Munckton's sources for yourself. NO you're just believing what your told. watch Lord Monckton Bunkum by potholer54. He has 5 videos showing how Monckton is falsifying data, misquoting and misleading his followers. Unlike Monckton, Potholer cites 100% of his sources and also shows you where you can read the sources Monckton dishonestly quotes from.
@Jshect, Scientific journals have been compromised as proved by climategate simply because any peer review of the data IPCC refuses to release will risk the trillions of dollars of new taxes. Perhaps you should write to atmospheric physicist, MIT Professor of Meteorology and former IPCC lead author, Richard S. Lindzen. (watch?v=uu9fprxnkEI). He has offered to send people real facts on the subject.
@0urGaia "Richard S. Lindzen. (watch?v=uu9fprxnkEI). He has offered to send people real facts on the subject."
From where does Lindzen get his "real facts"? If all the sources of original data are part of the evil worldwide climategate conspiracy, what sources does he use? Does Lindzen have his own satellites, or what?
@MaluronLurette, "facts" and "data" have two different meanings. A fact like "IPCC does not have a atmospheric model for global warming" has nothing to do with temperature data. If you want to know facts about global warming then write him Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric physicist, MIT Professor of Meteorology.
@0urGaia "If you want to know facts about global warming then write him Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric physicist, MIT Professor of Meteorology."--
LOL
I highly doubt that Lindzen has any "facts" about global warming to present. At least, I know his papers and I couldn't find a "fact" that would disprove AGW. But maybe you know more than I do regarding those "facts"? Could you name such a Lindzen-"fact" perhaps?
@MaluronLurette, If you want temperature data then you will need try get individual sources as IPCC have refused release of global temperature data. But IPCC data is questionable in light of Moscow's Institute for Economic Analysis (IEA) accusing IPCC of cherry picking data.
IPCC is a political institution, not a scientific one. They don't produce any data, and they cannot refuse the release of data. You parrot the nonsense you have read at some blog, do you?
@MaluronLurette, no, IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change established by UNEP. IPCC data is an amalgamation of data from various sources (HadCRUT etc). Some of which was purchased thus restricted under contractual obligations for release to third parties (or so say them). Their website contains download links to download some data owned by them.
@MaluronLurette, If you really interest in global warming instead of acting like a child, suggest you look for a paper writen by US solar observatory team livingston & penn concerning sunspots. They projected that sun will enter a Maunder Minimum by 2015. The last time the Maunder Minimum occurred was dubbed the little ice age (LIA) ~1750AD. It was preceded by a warming period from 1688–1738 that matches today's warming spell.
@0urGaia "They projected that sun will enter a Maunder Minimum by 2015"--
The effect of a Maunder Minimum on global temperature is too small. It will reduce the global temperatures for ~0.3°C, while the effect of global warming will be between 3.7°C to 4.5°C.
"On the effect of a new grand minimum of solar activity on the future climate on Earth", Feulner / Rahmstorf, 2010.
@0urGaia "The last time the Maunder Minimum occurred was dubbed the little ice age (LIA) ~1750AD"--
The LIA was caused by the Maunder minimum plus an increased volcano activity. However, there was no warming effect due to increased CO2 levels, unlike nowadays.
@MaluronLurette, When oceans/ permafrosts warm their ability to absorb CO2 decrease. The CO2 variations follow temperature curve so cannot be the cause - google vostok ice core records for carbon dioxide concentration and temperature change. The recent winters of Europe are just a prelude to what mother nature has in store for us. If the Mauder Minimum occurs we could face world crop failures in the not to distant future. We risking the life's of many from those that seek greed above all else.
@0urGaia "The CO2 variations follow temperature curve so cannot be the cause"--
That only happens when CO2 doesn't initiate a warming, but acts as an amplifier. That happened after the last Ice Age. That warming was caused by changes in the earth's orbit (see: Milankovitch cycles).
"The recent winters of Europe"--
(1) Local weather trends are irrelevant. And: 2010 was globally the hottest year on the record.
Most of all, the total heat content is still increasing at an accelerated rate.
@MaluronLurette, "2010 was not the hottest on year" which countries had their hottest summers, australia?, US?, Europe?, ASIA? Exactly where? With statistic's you can simply remove data that conflicts with the findings you want to release. The warming period ended 2001/2002 but governments are hoping that 76 trillion (UN figure) will replace loss revenue from the internet/housing bubbles. If they were worried about the environment they could simply legislate change.
(2) The increased amount of snow/snowstorms in the past winter is the result of the warming which leads to increased evaporation and precipitation, which then falls as increased snow in winter.
"If the Mauder Minimum occurs"--
Again: The effect of a MM will be -0.3°C, that of AGW is +3.7°C to 4.5°C. That means, that a low solar activity will only slightly reduce the warming. Most of all, its effect is by far too weak to cause a cooling.
@MaluronLurette, The "-0.3°C" figure by itself is meaningless without modeling total atmospheric effect. Google "Cloud Altitude Change Causes Global Temperature Change by Dan Pangburn P.E".
@0urGaia "The "-0.3°C" figure by itself is meaningless"--
No. It means exactly what it says. It is not about atmospheric effects at all, it refers to the imbalance in the energy budget of the earth. Global warming (cooling) is a thermodynamical process.
@MaluronLurette, Its not a closed system, both input and output (reflection) need be consider. if you visit acrim site (acrim dot com), click on Climate Change Debate, it says temperature variance found from acrim satellites equate to 0.6C (under acrim satellite dispute) which accounts for 60% of the "1.0c" global warming with other 40% possibly caused by clouds etc. If you want legislate planting of tree's I'm all for it but taxing people, already taxed out, for atmospheric gases is a joke
@0urGaia WTF.... sorry, but I think you have to learn all the basics first. That mix of smattering and ignorance you present here is awful, especially in a form of combined nonsense which also includes political rant.
@MaluronLurette, yes I thought you wouldn't like acrim data. Kind of makes you look like a fool. But if the hat fits! GOODBYE and don't forget to rug up, its going get cold out there :)
@0urGaia "yes I thought you wouldn't like acrim data"--
What I actually don't like are people like you, who love to swagger at forums proudly presenting their extreme ignorance, actually believing that others have to take them serious. Your comments on temperature show that you haven't the slightest idea how thermodynamical processes work. Nor do you know the difference between global warming and climate change, yet not even the difference between global climate and local weather/climate trends.
Science does not progress by consensus; it progresses by falsification and what scientists refer to as 'paradigm shifts'. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Science only requires one investigator who happens to be right, meaning that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.
The Russian BREST nuclear reactors are meltdown-proofed because they are using plutonium nitride fuel rods spaced apart to prevent overheating & meltdowns indefinitely & allow molten lead coolant to pass through them by the natural convection effect and at the same time to conduct, disperse, and dissipate heat from the nuclear core even without convection cooling and is shielded by the massive pool of molten lead itself acting also as a passive heat sink without the need for moving parts.
The parallel between the mass-produced model T Ford cars and other mass produced cars with nuclear power is very clear. Nuclear power needs time to learn from it's mistakes and accidents and problems to design, test, and build ultra-safe and fail-safe nuclear reactors. The Russians knew that situation, thus learning from the Chernobyl tragedy they created the BREST nuclear reactors that can consume it's nuclear wastes and recycling it's nuclear fuel indefinitely and is passively cooled safely.
Nuclear faces the same problem parallel that of mass-produced model T Ford cars. When cars becomes mass produceable for the masses, many accidents and fatalities occurred but it did not stop us using cars. Instead we started using the time in learning from those problems and accidents until cars are so safe that the safest car is a Volvo model that has a highway accident where the occupants came out of the Volvo car UNSCATHED! The same thing is happening from nuclear power.
The problem is that we are facing a coming Ice Age w/c will be preceded by climate fluctuations of extreme heat and cold, droughts and floods, excessive rains and aridity, making people confused and easily manipulated by Al Gore's lies. Why is Russian is spending madly on nuclear power despite it's inexhuastible abiotic oil & gas reserves is because only nuclear power that can make people survive an Ice Age, look at the permanent Arctic and Antarctic bases & towns (Bilibino) using nuclear power!
I may not like Monckton very much, but I still think Global Warming is a scam. What about the scientists and studies he mentions in this lecture, anyone know anything about them?
Just wondering - conservatives support a pure Free Market - removal of all regulation and intervention of government into financial markets.
The Elite own 93% of our financial wealth and built, own and run our financial system, WHY would you leave them alone with No rules and NO supervision?
"Average temperatures have climbed 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degree Celsius) around the world since 1880, much of this in recent decades, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies"
So just who are we to believe, well for one not the politicians, nor any of those who are influenced by them on either side of the argument.
As for Lord Haw Haw here, I am sure he has his reasons for believing that which he wishes, but something is happening.
I stick to the simple belief that we each should live in balance with nature, not being wasteful and living naturally as much as possible , but much else is out of our control. We'll never be as balanced as the native americans were unless we eliminate life as we now know it and start from scratch. I will always own a car, etc. However I believe nature has a way of cleansing itself and creating its own balance. In the end everything will be as it should be, no matter what we do or say about it.
Interesting counter to Inconvenient Truth, but anytime anyone uses fear as a tactic to push an agenda I become skeptical. Although I'd consider myself a bit of an environmentalist, I've had doubts of the global warming scare. But at the same time this Monckton character doesn't seem the real deal either.
He oversaw the sell-off of social housing casuing the single greatest rise in the UK homeless population since WWII. Until Monckton it was a rarity to see people living in cardboard boxes and shop-doorways, now it's just a fact of life.
@Undergroundhiphop1 "..as an environmental scientist.." Oh, really? A 20 year old environmental SCIENTIST under the handle "Undergroundhiphop1"? No, I would think you're more likely a very liberal college student, brainwashed by liberal kool-aid and media spin, who likes to bash people you disagree with while presenting no factual data of your own to back it up. You'll fit in just right with the rest of your sheeple-ass kind, lol.
@goog2k The Himalyan glacier scare was covered under "GlacierGate" where the IPCC admitted lying about the report. I'm waiting for the global warming this summer so I can shed my clothes and hit the nude beach. Do you ever take off your diaper and enjoy the global warming?
the problem is that talking a sence to a green eco-mentalist brain is like talking to a brick wall or posibly throwing pearls to a swine.
eco-mentalism is no longer a sensible way of thinking it is a religion where dogma is not up for debate and anybody who disagree is marched off to be burned at a stake. the green inquisition is no longer corncerned with enviroment but with power just look at the pack of green/red bastards in eu parliment
@janak19771977 i don't know how you can come out with such an ignorant comment. in case you have realised take a look at the environment in the world today. and something has to be done about it and fast. if you don't agree please state the scientific sources to back up your claim. what you are preaching is homicidal stupidity
@gavhof well i think the green actions speakfor it self. stopink nuclear powe in favour of windmils which can never produce enugh energy for one.the green idea of going back to stoneage reall does not appeal to me and most of the people. besides it looks like we are heading for a mini ice age at the moment so the irony is really great.
@janak19771977 you have avoided the question i have asked. are you denying anthropogenic climate change? and if you are, state the scientific peer review journals to back your claim. if you agree it is real, you will agree something has to be done? there are sacrifices that are going to have to be made - the developed and developing countries are consuming far far too much energy. i get the impression you have been watching too many uninformed youtube vids.
@janak19771977 watch Lord Monckton Bunkum by potholer54. He has 5 videos showing how Monckton is falsifying data, misquoting and misleading his followers. Unlike Monckton, Potholer cites 100% of his sources and also shows you where you can read the sources Monckton quotes from so you can see his dishonesty for yourself.
@Jshect iam not a big fan of mockton but considering the total bullshit fed to us by ecomentalists and considering the fact that even some of the ecomentalists are now complainig about the dogy data and total lack of profesionalism exibited by the un panell i give him a chance.
and btw acording to the latest dada we have now 70%chance of heading in to a mini ice age....i wonder what ecomentalist will say then, probably blame it on global warming
@81broncoman Just found your comment in my inbox. Where to start. Test show that HIV cannot pass through latex. Reason? It is airtight, during latex setting film formation occurs. It is not a filter. Condoms can and do stop HIV.
Also no one knows how HIV started. It has been found as early as the 60's in the cancer of a teenager, the Canadian air host idea is an anecdote. Nothing more.
@81broncoman no just cleaning stuff out. Read something so utterly devoid of logic and reason and just so amazingly stupid i felt like responding before deleting
Not only did potholer54 debunk lots of the malevolencies of this bulge eyed rat bastard. Prof. J Abrahams also has a lengthy point by point presentation where he shows this giant pillock to be a lying tosser and immoral git. Easily findable on google.
These debate frustrators must be dealt with with the utmost contempt and animosity.
If you thought this was good, the narrated powerpoint by John Abraham was much better! Just do a google search on abraham monckton, and it will be one of the top hits.
This video makes me so happy. Finally someone is debunking the conventional wisdom that has been brainwashing the vulnerable and stupid people in this world.
"As well as publishing a long series of falsehoods about climate change, Monckton has falsely claimed to be a member of the House of Lords; falsely claimed to be a Nobel laureate; falsely claimed to have won the Falklands war... maintained that he has invented a cure for HIV, multiple sclerosis, influenza and other diseases" - George Monbiot, The Guardian, July 14, 2010
This has been flagged as spam show
I want this video on my T720i unit.
octaviocurti922 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Look at the windbags math of global warming vs economic cost to humans.
If you have not already viewed this clip of bogus mathematics LORD Monckton type this in the you tube search engine "Lord Monckton VS Al Gore/UN On Theory Of Global Warming" on Glenn Beck...another piece of work. Apparently there is a new mathematical unit in climate science known as "tonnes/ppm", which equates to mass over concentration, mathematical bullshit with a 3 piece suit.
complexadaptive 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Lord Monckton is fighting the Wall St carbon gangster scumbags for the working & middle class. Down with Wall St carbon taxes, up Monckton!
ChristopherMonckton5 4 weeks ago
He`s dangerous on the one side and ridiculous on the other...
mittedom 1 month ago
@mittedom That is why he is dangerous, he rotates around using science to try to prove his point and then attempts to disprove thousands of competent scientists and scientific method as nonsense. To put it simply this LORD is a lying pompous windbag, who has been proven wrong on many occasions on record, and when contronted with it gets absolutely rude and angry in his response to the evidence against his claims.
complexadaptive 4 weeks ago
Paging algore.
.
Why`s algore hiding ?
.
classic7890 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Please watch this dissection of Monckton's credibility and claims about global warming. If you are inclined to believe Monckton you'll be likely to dismiss it, but please watch it to know about criticisms directed towards him. It's made by a journalist with a science degree in geology. watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM&feature=BFa&list=PL8E2FEA64D20EC9AF&lf=results_main
jiin5993 1 month ago
Just in case anyone still takes this liar and fraudster seriously, visit the UK Parliament website. The clerk to the parliaments posted a letter to Lord Monckton reminding him that he is NOT a member of the House of Lords, and once again asked him to desist with his false claim.
widebody123 2 months ago
@widebody123 u can be a Lord but not be a member of the House of Lords. Douche Bag he explained that once to Congress!!!!!
SvenStadt 2 months ago
@widebody123 btw what does that have to do with anything?!!! He's still making the arguments!!!!! Douche bag even if he wasn't a Lord he still has the education and shit!!!
SvenStadt 2 months ago
@widebody123 You don't understand what a lord is. Are you english?
zwiiyt 1 month ago
Guys, Lord Monckton is Sacha Baron Cohen. Wise up!
brandalisms 2 months ago
@brandalisms no lord monckton is not sacha baron cohen. it really was lord monckton in the chaser's sketch but no, it's not sacha cohen. read this, i thought it was sacha too lol! type in lord monckton in google and chasers and you shuld get some articles about it. chasers totally fooled gullible ppl like me.
deltathebest1 2 months ago
@deltathebest1 Yeah, I read that after lol
brandalisms 2 months ago
I cant believe people believe hm!
Gearlan92 2 months ago
Have any of you who are giving Monckton support actually checked any of his claims?
djpob 3 months ago
This man is great because he gets to the bottom of climate issues. So carbon dioxide is not the issue and thus not the way to wreck the economies of the world to control a minor problem.
computarman 3 months ago
i'm so confused! is it him!?
mrsrechtebanaan 3 months ago
@mrsrechtebanaan I believe it is indeed him. He is such a good performer, rite?
MsBickle76 3 months ago
I prefer his earlier work.
Nahasapasa 3 months ago
It's not Sasha. You obviously missed the point of the post on reddit. It's a parody of a parody.
fooshydoo 3 months ago
HAHAHAHA....trolled so hard
xHeARTtHroBx 3 months ago
To all the people claiming Lord Monckton is Sacha Baron Cohen, you've been trolled.
PhoBoyFresh 3 months ago
@PhoBoyFresh Nope, you have.
vberg90 3 months ago
Comment removed
jacobrosskleinberg 3 months ago
@PhoBoyFresh lol educate yourself you fool. It is him.
sxisohar 3 months ago
@sxisohar
Seriously? You truly believe that Lord Monckton is Sacha Baron Cohen? This man has been around longer than Sacha Baron Cohen has lived and its an impossible task for ANY make-up artist to alter his physiognomy to such an extent without plastic surgery. When you want to make a valid point, make sure you don't resort to name calling as it makes you look like stupid and incompetent.
pwnz1lla69 3 months ago
@pwnz1lla69 k
sxisohar 3 months ago
Comment removed
craigthe3rd 3 months ago
Comment removed
r2sleepio 3 months ago
These comments are hilarious. Sasha Baron Cohen = Lord Monckton
propofolwalla 3 months ago
@propofolwalla Haha I love how no one is getting this. Great Success Sasha.
xXSoundscapeXx 3 months ago
@propofolwalla No... Where did you get that piece of information from?
iTomAnks 3 months ago
monkton is a liar, when he says "check my sources" do so, they nearly all come from papers SUPPORTING GW if he thought GW was untrue why is he using lies if he knows any truth to back him up. Also consider his regard for you, he encourages you to check his sources presuming you won't. Never had a peer reviewed paper published was never thatchers advisor on anything and has zero qualifications to pontificate on this subject whereas 99+% of those who do say he is wrong, a shill sham shitehawk
dazmin100 3 months ago
Amazing how Americans have given so much attention to Monckton the LIAR.
There are tons of info discrediting him, associating him with the billionaire Koch brothers who have been spending loads of money onn the denialism propaganda.
Try this for a start:
watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM
sunamori6765 3 months ago
@sunamori6765 Lord Monckton is a statistical annalist and a mathematician. It is no secret that he was hired by the Koch's to research the Anthropogenic Global Warming phenomenon. Through his numerous contacts from within the international, scientific and academic community he has drawn the conclusions exhibited here. Don't fall back on petty abuse. Put your arguments to the contrary to him directly. Don't be shy He would welcome the debate. Put up or shut up.
Basicallybenign 3 months ago
@Basicallybenign He is NOT a "lord" to start with. Google it.
Mathematician? Nah... he is NOT a mathematician... Ask Google and READ!
___
A video DEBUNKING the fake "lord" Monckton:
Monckton Bunkum Part 1:
watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM
___
Debunking Lord Monckton Part 1:
watch?v=JfA1LpiYk2o
sunamori6765 3 months ago
Comment removed
sunamori6765 3 months ago
Comment removed
sunamori6765 3 months ago
Please Google:
"lord monckton the crazy fraud"
__
"christopher monckton lies"
__
"Is monckton a mathematician?"
sunamori6765 3 months ago
man i would love to be able to talk like him
tarek943 3 months ago
Comment removed
Zhihveli 3 months ago
Please watch the rebuddle by Dr. John Abraham and you will learn that this man is a liar
sconny09 4 months ago
@sconny09
Why? Because he is a "lord"? (a lie, he is not)
Or because he writes "peer reviewed papers"? (another lie, he has not written one...ever)
Or because he "discovered the cure for AIDS"? (another lie he told, obviously)
The man is a pathological liar paid by Exxon and the Koch brothers to travel and cheat people.
Not surprisingly LOTS of people believe him.
sunamori6765 3 months ago
@sunamori6765 you realize that this is Sacha Baron Cohen.
twwwhitney 3 months ago
so does this mean we don't have to pay green taxes any more? no, the mass population are still in ignorance and they're ploughing ahead with the whole scam, aided and abetted by the EU's centralized fascist control
chrish12345 4 months ago in playlist chrish12345's Favorited Videos
its too long
conorhughes1497 4 months ago
damnlazyfuk your so paranoid you really think that your highest chance of getting aids is from other people trying to live there life and not some goverment or corperation dumping it in youre water supply? they made the damn thing wich mean a cure had to be invented first, not to mention there are things out there that do fight it if they were in high enough abundence it isnt imposible that it could be overcome ..i bet you dont even no how to cure cancer quarantined for the pursope of research
LBFOREVERLB 4 months ago
climate change = fake,
its a cycle that we have no control over.
bigbad1000do7a 5 months ago
Time mark 29:30 Glaciers. For my own reference.
steam0001 5 months ago
Monckton is NOT a member of the House of Lords. The clerk of the parliaments recently made a point of publishing a letter to that effect on the uk parliament website. He is a blatant charlatan ( although most entertaining).
widebody123 5 months ago
Monckton has been exposed as a LIAR and a FRAUD.
Sources: guardian.co.uk Viscount Monckton's climate change scepticism has been discredited by Professor John Abraham
realclimate - Monckton makes it up
desmogblog - Christopher Monckton
Monckton is a lacky of the Koch brothers. These 2 men are primarily responsible for the entire denialism movement.
Sources: climatesciencewatch - Koch Industries multibillionaire Koch brothers bankroll attacks on climate change science and policy
68spaceman 6 months ago
Comment removed
LBFOREVERLB 4 months ago
for y'all that like this, check out bbickmore's blog.
fiflanc 6 months ago
im about 30 mins into this and I haven't been given any data and analysis yet, could someone try and prove AGW wrong for me already?
ed1phant 6 months ago
If polar bears are dying all over the place, then why don't the climate change advocates show us the bodies: ones that have not be bludgeoned by poachers.I would not buy a used car from that zionist Al Gore let alone let him convince me that the world is going to implode from climate change.Wake up sheeople!!!!!!!! Advocates of climate change have already set up an elaborate trading scheme using carbon credits and will make a killing.On the other hand Monckton has nothing to gain monitarily.
mishmiaoul 6 months ago
@mishmiaoul - Good points. Speaking at the Aspen Institute on August 4, 2011, Al Gore became unhinged, bemoaning the fact that there’s no longer a “shared reality on climate even though the very existence of our civilization is at stake.” Complaining that audiences are pushing back and asking tough questions, Gore unleashed a torrent of profanity during his talk. Gore is clearly distraught that he and his comrades are loosing the debate on global warming. And this guy won the Nobel Prize?
bgibb101 5 months ago 2
"... it is all interesting (Monckton's background) ... " ??
He is a charlatan. Non-scientist, not a Margaret Thatcher advisor (his name is not mentioned once in her 900 page biography), not a member of the House of Lords. Monckton is entitled to use a fading British title because his old man had one. He is not an elected politician. He is not a mathemetician. He has a classics degree and a "diploma in journalism". He is a nobody, in every sense of the word.
WaltHawtin 6 months ago
Lord Monkton the guy that can cure aids? oh well that is one of his lies he sells to people.
Aanthanur 6 months ago
Why read Jesus' words in LATIN? A dead language used by the most anti-christian organisation, with the most gruesome history, on earth
SuperJane99 6 months ago
@SuperJane99 He told in the video you half wit. Latin, the language of the Roman Empire which was the empire in control of the region were Jesus lived, was the actual language the Jesus spoke. Historical fact.
steam0001 5 months ago
@steam0001 The historical fact is that Jesus spoke Aramaic and you are the half wit.
SuperJane99 5 months ago
@SuperJane99 Yes he did. He also spoke Latin & given who our was talking to in that passage which language do you think he was speaking?
Sorry for calling you a half wit. That was uncalled for.
steam0001 5 months ago
Good on you Christopher Monckton. Big banks want carbon trading and DEBT. Truth is we heading for another LIA event which will be caused by suns diminishing sunspots as predicted by US solar observatory some years back.
Rug Up.
0urGaia 6 months ago
What is this " Lord " business ? this Ignorant Cretin should be sweeping the streets.
zalgruesa 6 months ago
Come on people, stop with the personal attacks and insinuations against this man. There are many scientists and politicans who I gravely dislike, but I still listen to their views and treat them with the appropriate respect. As individuals, we all have different views and understanding's of different subject matters, whether we agree or not. There is nothing ever to be gained, regardless of how you justify it, by attacking people who hold a different view from you're own.
MegaPostman77 6 months ago
Christopher is a hero for the truth and kills all that non-sense global warming theory.
OSS732 7 months ago
@OSS732 watch Lord Monckton Bunkum by potholer54. He has 5 videos showing how Monckton is falsifying data, misquoting and misleading his followers. Unlike Monckton, Potholer cites 100% of his sources and also shows you where you can read the sources Monckton quotes from so you can see his dishonesty for yourself.
Jshect 6 months ago
all you can do is attack how they guy looks but not the facts that are out there to find , why was there more co2 in the air a thousand years ago than today answer to that, oh sorry you don't know huh well i guess you better figure it out before you tax us huh huh wouldnt that be a good idea and while your at figure figure why we had a medieval warming than it was today but you know i could tell you right here , its the sun , its fluctuates and is not completely constant temp duh
tartan377 7 months ago
Bug Eyed Imbecile !!
zalgruesa 7 months ago
Lord Christopher Monckton > Climate Change Propaganda Scientists
OhhShakeItBaby 7 months ago
Monckton's, Moses to the dimwitted Denialist movement.
""there is only one way to stop AIDS. That is to screen the entire population regularly and to quarantine all carriers of the disease for life. Every member of the population should be blood-tested every month ... all those found to be infected with the virus, even if only as carriers, should be isolated compulsorily, immediately, and permanently."
DamLazyFuk 7 months ago 9
@DamLazyFuk I don't know which is worse, the Denier movement or the Creationist movement.
JeersForAll 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JeersForAll God forbid anyone criticize or cross examine the religion of global warming/climate change.
lockdown260 6 months ago
Comment removed
lockdown260 6 months ago
@DamLazyFuk Oh yea? How else are you going to get rid of AIDS?
Iisdabest889 4 months ago
@DamLazyFuk
Attacking strawman; how original.
regelemihai 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DamLazyFuk Oh yea? How else are you going to get rid of AIDS?
Zhihveli 3 months ago
@DamLazyFuk You know he is Sacha Baron Cohen right?
Harboggles 3 months ago
@Harboggles You know he is not Sacha Baron Cohen right?
craigthe3rd 3 months ago
@craigthe3rd Google it.
Harboggles 3 months ago
@Harboggles I assume you have been fooled by this video -- youtu,be/w833cAs9EN0 (change the , to a .)
craigthe3rd 3 months ago
@craigthe3rd Sacha is Monckton. Deal with it. You and the rest of the world were fooled. It's okay.
Harboggles 3 months ago
@Harboggles Go to amazon, type in "Christopher Monckton." There are books published by him from the 1980's. It is not Borat. You are and the rest of the world were fooled. It's okay.
craigthe3rd 3 months ago
@craigthe3rd Just did. Theres no images of the book or anything. His Wikipedia page is incredibly detailed and the man speaks with the same intelligence level as Sacha (who is a genius) and you can tell in the way he phrases himself that he doesn't really belive what he is saying and it is obviously satire.
Harboggles 3 months ago
@Harboggles His eye condition alone should be enough for you to realize it couldn't possibly be Sacha. There isn't a makeup artist in the world capable of doing that.
The biggest giveaway tho, is that THIS ISN'T FUNNY. Not even slightly...
Think what you want tho, I'm done arguing with you. You'll realize soon enough.
craigthe3rd 3 months ago
@craigthe3rd because it's impossible to use someone elses name?
jacobrosskleinberg 3 months ago
@craigthe3rd You mean he is* Sacha Baron Cohen.
twwwhitney 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Harboggles I don't have to google it because it is not Borat. It is just some crazy ass politician. How the hell would Borat make his eyes look like that?
Plus.. this isn't even funny..
craigthe3rd 3 months ago
"The ROTHSCHILD Banking MAFIA are the instigators of this huge tax scam !!! - - David Mayer DeRothschild is the public face and main pusher of the man made global warming lies... oops I mean "Climate Change" oh yes it's "climate change" now isn't it !!!
MonkeyMagic88 7 months ago
TROLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Aceblast135 7 months ago
These liberal do-gooders will believe anything. If you told them that pigs could fly they would probably believe it. Man-made global warming is absolute bollocks in every sense of the word, PERIOD!
MegaPostman77 7 months ago
@MegaPostman77 you are just another uninform idoit who thinks he know it all. please show me the scientific peer review publications to support your claim or please shut up. your belief is ignorant and dangerous
gavhof 7 months ago
@MegaPostman77 and obviously you'll believe anything just like they will. Have you read the scientific journals on Global Warming or looked into Munckton's sources for yourself. NO you're just believing what your told. watch Lord Monckton Bunkum by potholer54. He has 5 videos showing how Monckton is falsifying data, misquoting and misleading his followers. Unlike Monckton, Potholer cites 100% of his sources and also shows you where you can read the sources Monckton dishonestly quotes from.
Jshect 6 months ago
@Jshect, Scientific journals have been compromised as proved by climategate simply because any peer review of the data IPCC refuses to release will risk the trillions of dollars of new taxes. Perhaps you should write to atmospheric physicist, MIT Professor of Meteorology and former IPCC lead author, Richard S. Lindzen. (watch?v=uu9fprxnkEI). He has offered to send people real facts on the subject.
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia "Richard S. Lindzen. (watch?v=uu9fprxnkEI). He has offered to send people real facts on the subject."
From where does Lindzen get his "real facts"? If all the sources of original data are part of the evil worldwide climategate conspiracy, what sources does he use? Does Lindzen have his own satellites, or what?
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, "facts" and "data" have two different meanings. A fact like "IPCC does not have a atmospheric model for global warming" has nothing to do with temperature data. If you want to know facts about global warming then write him Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric physicist, MIT Professor of Meteorology.
0urGaia 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0urGaia "If you want to know facts about global warming then write him Richard S. Lindzen, Atmospheric physicist, MIT Professor of Meteorology."--
LOL
I highly doubt that Lindzen has any "facts" about global warming to present. At least, I know his papers and I couldn't find a "fact" that would disprove AGW. But maybe you know more than I do regarding those "facts"? Could you name such a Lindzen-"fact" perhaps?
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, If you want temperature data then you will need try get individual sources as IPCC have refused release of global temperature data. But IPCC data is questionable in light of Moscow's Institute for Economic Analysis (IEA) accusing IPCC of cherry picking data.
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia "But IPCC data"--
IPCC data? LOL.
IPCC is a political institution, not a scientific one. They don't produce any data, and they cannot refuse the release of data. You parrot the nonsense you have read at some blog, do you?
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, no, IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change established by UNEP. IPCC data is an amalgamation of data from various sources (HadCRUT etc). Some of which was purchased thus restricted under contractual obligations for release to third parties (or so say them). Their website contains download links to download some data owned by them.
0urGaia 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0urGaia "no, IPCC is the leading international body for the assessment of climate change"--
The IPCC is irrelevant for research on climate change.
"thus restricted under contractual obligations for release to third parties "--
That is utter bullshit.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, If you really interest in global warming instead of acting like a child, suggest you look for a paper writen by US solar observatory team livingston & penn concerning sunspots. They projected that sun will enter a Maunder Minimum by 2015. The last time the Maunder Minimum occurred was dubbed the little ice age (LIA) ~1750AD. It was preceded by a warming period from 1688–1738 that matches today's warming spell.
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia "instead of acting like a child"--
Actually, it is you who act like a child, and I'm amused.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@0urGaia "They projected that sun will enter a Maunder Minimum by 2015"--
The effect of a Maunder Minimum on global temperature is too small. It will reduce the global temperatures for ~0.3°C, while the effect of global warming will be between 3.7°C to 4.5°C.
"On the effect of a new grand minimum of solar activity on the future climate on Earth", Feulner / Rahmstorf, 2010.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@0urGaia "The last time the Maunder Minimum occurred was dubbed the little ice age (LIA) ~1750AD"--
The LIA was caused by the Maunder minimum plus an increased volcano activity. However, there was no warming effect due to increased CO2 levels, unlike nowadays.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, When oceans/ permafrosts warm their ability to absorb CO2 decrease. The CO2 variations follow temperature curve so cannot be the cause - google vostok ice core records for carbon dioxide concentration and temperature change. The recent winters of Europe are just a prelude to what mother nature has in store for us. If the Mauder Minimum occurs we could face world crop failures in the not to distant future. We risking the life's of many from those that seek greed above all else.
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia "The CO2 variations follow temperature curve so cannot be the cause"--
That only happens when CO2 doesn't initiate a warming, but acts as an amplifier. That happened after the last Ice Age. That warming was caused by changes in the earth's orbit (see: Milankovitch cycles).
"The recent winters of Europe"--
(1) Local weather trends are irrelevant. And: 2010 was globally the hottest year on the record.
Most of all, the total heat content is still increasing at an accelerated rate.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, "2010 was not the hottest on year" which countries had their hottest summers, australia?, US?, Europe?, ASIA? Exactly where? With statistic's you can simply remove data that conflicts with the findings you want to release. The warming period ended 2001/2002 but governments are hoping that 76 trillion (UN figure) will replace loss revenue from the internet/housing bubbles. If they were worried about the environment they could simply legislate change.
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia "Exactly where? "---
Globally of course. Isn't that obvious? We are talking about GLOBAL warming, aren't we?
"With statistic's you can simply remove data that conflicts with the findings you want to release. "--
That's exactly what denialists have done all the time.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@0urGaia "The recent winters of Europe"--
(2) The increased amount of snow/snowstorms in the past winter is the result of the warming which leads to increased evaporation and precipitation, which then falls as increased snow in winter.
"If the Mauder Minimum occurs"--
Again: The effect of a MM will be -0.3°C, that of AGW is +3.7°C to 4.5°C. That means, that a low solar activity will only slightly reduce the warming. Most of all, its effect is by far too weak to cause a cooling.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, The "-0.3°C" figure by itself is meaningless without modeling total atmospheric effect. Google "Cloud Altitude Change Causes Global Temperature Change by Dan Pangburn P.E".
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia "The "-0.3°C" figure by itself is meaningless"--
No. It means exactly what it says. It is not about atmospheric effects at all, it refers to the imbalance in the energy budget of the earth. Global warming (cooling) is a thermodynamical process.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, Its not a closed system, both input and output (reflection) need be consider. if you visit acrim site (acrim dot com), click on Climate Change Debate, it says temperature variance found from acrim satellites equate to 0.6C (under acrim satellite dispute) which accounts for 60% of the "1.0c" global warming with other 40% possibly caused by clouds etc. If you want legislate planting of tree's I'm all for it but taxing people, already taxed out, for atmospheric gases is a joke
0urGaia 6 months ago
@0urGaia WTF.... sorry, but I think you have to learn all the basics first. That mix of smattering and ignorance you present here is awful, especially in a form of combined nonsense which also includes political rant.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@MaluronLurette, yes I thought you wouldn't like acrim data. Kind of makes you look like a fool. But if the hat fits! GOODBYE and don't forget to rug up, its going get cold out there :)
0urGaia 6 months ago
Comment removed
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
@0urGaia "yes I thought you wouldn't like acrim data"--
What I actually don't like are people like you, who love to swagger at forums proudly presenting their extreme ignorance, actually believing that others have to take them serious. Your comments on temperature show that you haven't the slightest idea how thermodynamical processes work. Nor do you know the difference between global warming and climate change, yet not even the difference between global climate and local weather/climate trends.
MaluronLurette 6 months ago
Science does not progress by consensus; it progresses by falsification and what scientists refer to as 'paradigm shifts'. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Science only requires one investigator who happens to be right, meaning that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.
MegaPostman77 7 months ago 2
I love the opening shot at Obama.
VanDaRifleman 7 months ago 6
The Russian BREST nuclear reactors are meltdown-proofed because they are using plutonium nitride fuel rods spaced apart to prevent overheating & meltdowns indefinitely & allow molten lead coolant to pass through them by the natural convection effect and at the same time to conduct, disperse, and dissipate heat from the nuclear core even without convection cooling and is shielded by the massive pool of molten lead itself acting also as a passive heat sink without the need for moving parts.
darthvader5300 8 months ago
The parallel between the mass-produced model T Ford cars and other mass produced cars with nuclear power is very clear. Nuclear power needs time to learn from it's mistakes and accidents and problems to design, test, and build ultra-safe and fail-safe nuclear reactors. The Russians knew that situation, thus learning from the Chernobyl tragedy they created the BREST nuclear reactors that can consume it's nuclear wastes and recycling it's nuclear fuel indefinitely and is passively cooled safely.
darthvader5300 8 months ago
Nuclear faces the same problem parallel that of mass-produced model T Ford cars. When cars becomes mass produceable for the masses, many accidents and fatalities occurred but it did not stop us using cars. Instead we started using the time in learning from those problems and accidents until cars are so safe that the safest car is a Volvo model that has a highway accident where the occupants came out of the Volvo car UNSCATHED! The same thing is happening from nuclear power.
darthvader5300 8 months ago
The problem is that we are facing a coming Ice Age w/c will be preceded by climate fluctuations of extreme heat and cold, droughts and floods, excessive rains and aridity, making people confused and easily manipulated by Al Gore's lies. Why is Russian is spending madly on nuclear power despite it's inexhuastible abiotic oil & gas reserves is because only nuclear power that can make people survive an Ice Age, look at the permanent Arctic and Antarctic bases & towns (Bilibino) using nuclear power!
darthvader5300 8 months ago
I may not like Monckton very much, but I still think Global Warming is a scam. What about the scientists and studies he mentions in this lecture, anyone know anything about them?
KaneDWilliams 8 months ago
Just wondering - conservatives support a pure Free Market - removal of all regulation and intervention of government into financial markets.
The Elite own 93% of our financial wealth and built, own and run our financial system, WHY would you leave them alone with No rules and NO supervision?
Curious if any of you can address that?
God Bless.
HopeForPeaceNow 8 months ago
The poverty he mentions at 5: in Africa and South America is mainly due to Neoliberalism.
Anyone hip to that?
It undermines his entire argument. I bet about 99% of his supporters have no idea what it is.
Thoughts?
HopeForPeaceNow 8 months ago
Comment removed
HopeForPeaceNow 8 months ago
"Average temperatures have climbed 1.4 degrees Fahrenheit (0.8 degree Celsius) around the world since 1880, much of this in recent decades, according to NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies"
So just who are we to believe, well for one not the politicians, nor any of those who are influenced by them on either side of the argument.
As for Lord Haw Haw here, I am sure he has his reasons for believing that which he wishes, but something is happening.
Sliepnir2006 8 months ago
I stick to the simple belief that we each should live in balance with nature, not being wasteful and living naturally as much as possible , but much else is out of our control. We'll never be as balanced as the native americans were unless we eliminate life as we now know it and start from scratch. I will always own a car, etc. However I believe nature has a way of cleansing itself and creating its own balance. In the end everything will be as it should be, no matter what we do or say about it.
TheKween17 8 months ago
Interesting counter to Inconvenient Truth, but anytime anyone uses fear as a tactic to push an agenda I become skeptical. Although I'd consider myself a bit of an environmentalist, I've had doubts of the global warming scare. But at the same time this Monckton character doesn't seem the real deal either.
TheKween17 8 months ago
Monkton is an arrogant fool, I saw him be very rude to a lovely lady on an Irish talk show
RevolverAnthology 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I love it when CO2 fanatics drink soda. Total irony.
whiteviking99 8 months ago
I wish the slides were visible.
partyhouse88 8 months ago
potholer54
that is all
670Kiester 8 months ago
Oh, that loony Monckton's fucked off to the states has he?
Good riddance.
After what he did in the 1980s we should have hanged the evil tory cunt.
asubjectiveopinion 9 months ago
asubjectiveopinion
What did he do?
Rovinpiper 8 months ago
@Rovinpiper
He oversaw the sell-off of social housing casuing the single greatest rise in the UK homeless population since WWII. Until Monckton it was a rarity to see people living in cardboard boxes and shop-doorways, now it's just a fact of life.
He's a nasty Tory pig.
asubjectiveopinion 8 months ago
The Venus Project will be our global "system"(government)
crystalmethod1000 9 months ago
@81broncoman alright
crystalmethod1000 9 months ago
@Undergroundhiphop1 "..as an environmental scientist.." Oh, really? A 20 year old environmental SCIENTIST under the handle "Undergroundhiphop1"? No, I would think you're more likely a very liberal college student, brainwashed by liberal kool-aid and media spin, who likes to bash people you disagree with while presenting no factual data of your own to back it up. You'll fit in just right with the rest of your sheeple-ass kind, lol.
syko52 9 months ago 2
For a thorough debunking of his nonsense, google st.thomas university.
He is very entertaining though.
widebody123 10 months ago
See a new documented YT critique of Monckton's habitual LIES by an Australian science journalist:
Monckton Bunkum Part 1 - Global cooling and melting ice
/watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM&feature=related
Monckton Bunkum Part 2 - Sensitivity
/watch?v=PTY3FnsFZ7Q&feature=related
Monckton Bunkum Part 3 - Correlations and Himalayan glaciers
/watch?v=fpF48b6Lsbo&feature=related
It's absolutely devastating & fully documented.
Monckton is a typical SCAM artist making a lot of money promoting Oil & Coal.
goog2k 10 months ago
@goog2k The Himalyan glacier scare was covered under "GlacierGate" where the IPCC admitted lying about the report. I'm waiting for the global warming this summer so I can shed my clothes and hit the nude beach. Do you ever take off your diaper and enjoy the global warming?
Letgoofmypickel 9 months ago
the problem is that talking a sence to a green eco-mentalist brain is like talking to a brick wall or posibly throwing pearls to a swine.
eco-mentalism is no longer a sensible way of thinking it is a religion where dogma is not up for debate and anybody who disagree is marched off to be burned at a stake. the green inquisition is no longer corncerned with enviroment but with power just look at the pack of green/red bastards in eu parliment
janak19771977 10 months ago 2
@janak19771977 i don't know how you can come out with such an ignorant comment. in case you have realised take a look at the environment in the world today. and something has to be done about it and fast. if you don't agree please state the scientific sources to back up your claim. what you are preaching is homicidal stupidity
gavhof 7 months ago
@gavhof well i think the green actions speakfor it self. stopink nuclear powe in favour of windmils which can never produce enugh energy for one.the green idea of going back to stoneage reall does not appeal to me and most of the people. besides it looks like we are heading for a mini ice age at the moment so the irony is really great.
janak19771977 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@janak19771977 you have avoided the question i have asked. are you denying anthropogenic climate change? and if you are, state the scientific peer review journals to back your claim. if you agree it is real, you will agree something has to be done? there are sacrifices that are going to have to be made - the developed and developing countries are consuming far far too much energy. i get the impression you have been watching too many uninformed youtube vids.
gavhof 7 months ago
@janak19771977 watch Lord Monckton Bunkum by potholer54. He has 5 videos showing how Monckton is falsifying data, misquoting and misleading his followers. Unlike Monckton, Potholer cites 100% of his sources and also shows you where you can read the sources Monckton quotes from so you can see his dishonesty for yourself.
Jshect 6 months ago
@Jshect iam not a big fan of mockton but considering the total bullshit fed to us by ecomentalists and considering the fact that even some of the ecomentalists are now complainig about the dogy data and total lack of profesionalism exibited by the un panell i give him a chance.
and btw acording to the latest dada we have now 70%chance of heading in to a mini ice age....i wonder what ecomentalist will say then, probably blame it on global warming
janak19771977 6 months ago
@81broncoman Just found your comment in my inbox. Where to start. Test show that HIV cannot pass through latex. Reason? It is airtight, during latex setting film formation occurs. It is not a filter. Condoms can and do stop HIV.
Also no one knows how HIV started. It has been found as early as the 60's in the cancer of a teenager, the Canadian air host idea is an anecdote. Nothing more.
Nigeman 10 months ago
@Nigeman
Dude, your responding to my comment a solid year after it was made, do you have a.... life? Something better to do? Seriously, get current.
81broncoman 10 months ago
@81broncoman no just cleaning stuff out. Read something so utterly devoid of logic and reason and just so amazingly stupid i felt like responding before deleting
Nigeman 10 months ago
Excellent exposure of the climate hoax
aschwall 10 months ago 2
Not only did potholer54 debunk lots of the malevolencies of this bulge eyed rat bastard. Prof. J Abrahams also has a lengthy point by point presentation where he shows this giant pillock to be a lying tosser and immoral git. Easily findable on google.
These debate frustrators must be dealt with with the utmost contempt and animosity.
retepvosnul 10 months ago
potholer54 debunked this guy
ihmen 10 months ago
If you thought this was good, the narrated powerpoint by John Abraham was much better! Just do a google search on abraham monckton, and it will be one of the top hits.
MB64 11 months ago
I was there!!!
baller6262 11 months ago
This video makes me so happy. Finally someone is debunking the conventional wisdom that has been brainwashing the vulnerable and stupid people in this world.
bdub112791 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
watch glenn beck
MrJackle7 10 months ago
I just watched a video showing how wrong this guy is.
gregrutz 11 months ago
"As well as publishing a long series of falsehoods about climate change, Monckton has falsely claimed to be a member of the House of Lords; falsely claimed to be a Nobel laureate; falsely claimed to have won the Falklands war... maintained that he has invented a cure for HIV, multiple sclerosis, influenza and other diseases" - George Monbiot, The Guardian, July 14, 2010
terrymorse 11 months ago
@CptFrenchFry Let me rephrase that: "We can't know everything, so we know nothing." FAIL
BoredInfidel 11 months ago
@WW2medalsNpatchesME Yes, dipshit. Warmer air holds more moisture, and hence you get more precipitation. This is junior high science.
BoredInfidel 11 months ago
Monckton is a fraud.
Fibr3Optix 11 months ago
I believe this guy cos he is a Lord.
TomValedro 11 months ago
If you would like to see why Mockton is full of $hit, do a search for this video....
Monckton Bunkum #1 - Global cooling and melting ice
alueshen 11 months ago
Two great videos about Christopher Monckton and climate change. Very informative:
Part 1: /watch?v=fbW-aHvjOgM
Part 2: /watch?v=PTY3FnsFZ7Q
BasicSpace42 11 months ago 10
@BasicSpace42 Part 3: /watch?v=fpF48b6Lsbo
BoredInfidel 11 months ago
@BasicSpace42
Now I know he's telling the truth. watch these two links. Character assassination both.
Yes they attack the messenger not the massage. By this yea shall know them.
Ask these people about professor David Bellamy and why he never appears on national TV anymore.
wkbfutewc 10 months ago
Here's another video about Christopher Monckton:
/watch?v=QRbyvxr3Ib8
cristop5 11 months ago
Does he not know that the rich countries ship all their shit to the poor countries and pay them a few pennies to use their land as a dumping ground?
nanogeekpro 11 months ago
Not only is his arguments unconvincing, but his opening jokes are horrible.
technicallyabsurd 11 months ago