Added: 9 months ago
From: LAROUCHEpunktSE
Views: 1,560
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (23)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I can't get why some people are so afraid of a better world! Attack those that cause our problems like pollution, war and poverty! Who are paying you for doing this? I honor those who stand up for the rest of the world despite baseless accusations like these! Shame!

  • LOL. He shakes his head totally busted

  • Busted? He pitied the braindead fool!

  • why are we not allowed to participate in these debates. the next election not one person should vote

  • If humans are the marvel of this evolutionary process and they are so scared, then you must acknowledge that so are the rest of the billions of species on this planet. Which means ALL of them should be saved. Which is exactly why nuclear should be banned and people need to suck it up and stop using so much energy. The protesters in this video are saying that humans cannot survive without fossil fuels and nuclear. Only true if we all want to consume as much as we do right now! STFU!

  • @AcidProblemChild The matter is pretty simple. Throughout history on this planet, there have been mass extinctions in a cyclical pattern of about 62 million years. No animal species have been able to willfully change their "pre-programmed" behavior to survive such a crisis. This time, humanity is threatened. The good news is that we can make discoveries of universal principles and thereby improve our conditions. The bad news is the Empire's gang of Malthusians and fascists, who want genocide.

  • Not many States are immune from blame, but every State has the responsibility to improve Our legacy. Science has the ability to change our destiny – but it also has the ability to teach our present. As a scientist, I’ve seen too much that makes me believe we need to take the environment seriously – and not listen to fucking idiots like LaRouche with their own ‘Agenda’ that serves nothing but his own ego.

  • @TYwokki Environmentalism is a religious belief, as you actually just expressed yourself. If you are a scientist, you should work on the frontiers of science, and think about some of the most interesting paradoxes there, including the nature of the galaxy (e.g., the paradoxes of the Crab Nebula), cosmic radiation, and such things that have an effect of climate and weather patterns, earth-quakes, etc. Don't get stuck in some medieval Earth-worshipping Mother Gaia cult.

  • @LAROUCHEpunktSE, Firstly, I don’t need to go look to LaRouche for education. The term LaRouche and education is an oxymoron, a pragmatic contradiction of staggering proportions. Anything produced by LaRouche, or anyone connected to LaRouche, is automatically contaminated with idiocracy, a dose of gullibility, a mild Hedonism [sic] cold and a severe case of fucking stupidity.

  • @LAROUCHEpunktSE, Secondly, I never said Environmentalism is a religious belief. That concept itself is ridiculous. There’s nothing religious about Environmentalism unless you are implying that being conscious of the negative changes to the planet’s eco and climatic systems makes you some sort of Pagan, or in worst case scenario, weak.

  • @LAROUCHEpunktSE, Considering many aspects of the environmentalism movement tackles issues such as over-population, world poverty, diaspora, zonation/biogeography, economics and well, let’s face, the future of the planet, I’d say it’s a credible as any other Populist movement.

  • @LAROUCHEpunktSE, If you doubt that it does that adequately – make your case for it – but don’t just use redundant, and quite frankly, silly, arguments about it being Fascist or dominated by clandestine powers. No, it’s not perfect, but Environmentalism is sensible. Which is more than I can say for LaRouche and the total nonsense he exports.

    Lastly, the Earth Worshipping Medievil Cult Author you're talking about, he was involved with looking at planetary exploration. He worked for NASA.

  • Environmentalism is not Fascism. Idiots. It’s the inevitable conclusion of no-control bloated capitalism and competition between States to develop.

  • Basically, Larouche is nutts. His supporters are nutts. If these people knew half of what they think they know (including LaRouche) they’d actually be useful members of the community. As it stands, they’re just a pain in the arse and really should educate themselves better instead of exaggerating like a bunch of ingrates and manipulating circumstance to get noticed. As I see it only the foolish get fooled.

  • @TYwokki Instead of wasting our time with silly comments, you should go to LaRouchePAC[dot].com/basement and study some of the scientific work being done there.

  • James Lovelock has been discussing the issue since the early 70’s, and he’s as Leftwing ecocentric as Næssian Deep Ecology!! How anyone could compare that to Fascism is ludicrous! Godwin's law anyone??

  • What makes me laugh is how Larouche supporters use the term 'Energy Flux Density' without seemingly knowing what it is - that includes LaRouche. There are plenty of videos here on YouTube dating back years that would supposedly be pigeon-holed by these fanatics as the 'Green Agenda' that discus over population and energy security. 

  • In light of recent events in Japan, more nuclear power & green fascism are going to be a hard sell.

    This is my biggest worry with the Larouche plan, he talks about using technology & the creative ingenuity of man’s mind but defers to nuclear energy when there are New alternatives that are Not being considered, let alone being talked about. We now have a massive magnetic levitation power plant that could supply an entire city, without radiation or nuclear waste !!

  • Let these ecomaniacs give us an example for population control. They must jump off a cliff.

  • ...and a special appearance by...

    Hans Joachim "John" Schellnhuber CBE - director, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research; chairman, German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU)

  • Cast (in order of appearance):

    Gretchen Daily - professor, Stanford University

    Johan Rockström - chair of the symposium; executive director, Stockholm Resilience Center and Stockholm Environment Institute

    Andreas Carlgren - Swedish Environment Minister

    Carl Folke - director, Beijer Institute for Ecological Economics; science director, Stockholm Resilience Center

    Anders Wijkman - vice president, Club of Rome

    Nobel Laureates

    Victoria - Crown Princess of Sweden

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more