Thanks for showing the telescoping. It really helped me understand--I'd been wondering how such a puzzle could exist!
Am I correct in thinking that this design could be warped into a disk shape, where there were six concentric, two-section rings on each side, instead of six pairs of similar-looking cube shapes? Maybe easier to design, but harder to turn.... Hmm and I guess it could be a sphere too, or a 2x13 Rubik's cube... haha look at me, I'm scaling the foothills of twisty-puzzle theory!
@tianyulu If you really want to buy one, then just buy it. Of course it would be nice if someone else would invest several $10.000 to save you $100. But the world's market for this type of puzzles is limited, I am afraid ...
Oskar!, I watched this video twice... 1st time I was amazed by the close up to the telescopic design... 2nd time I was scared how you apply more force to twist it when it got stuck/locked... weren't you scared doing so??!! O_O
@richard2mitchell Please be so kind to read the description. It says "please do not mistake this for a cheap mass-produced puzzle". It is a one-of-a-kind prototype, that took a lot of money to create and produce.
@Ramhams1337 This puzzle was 3D-printed using nylon-powder SLS technology, which explains its price. It is the very first prototype, costing its designer and maker a lot of money to create. Please do not confuse it for a cheap mass-produced puzzle.
@Ramhams1337 I have sold a few to expert collectors. Yes, there are those. It is a much cheaper hobby than collecting Rembrandts, and gives longer fun :-)
@Ramhams1337 you are a total n00b when it comes to this stuff it takes many hard hours to design the puzzle. To purchase this rare puzzle (only 2 known to be made) the shapeways company has to do a very tedious process to create the 3d models.
@winsum4 Well, the Shapeways 3D-printing is fully automated. Still, it is an expensive machine with expensive material and expensive operation, including the post-3D-print cleaning to remove all the excess powder, and sorting the parts.
Those telescoping extensions looked paper thin. It's amazing that the puzzle doesn't just snap under it's own weight when you grab it by the end. What type of plastic did you use? It must have the strength of titanium to hold up like that...
Very nice! I'm very surprised as when you showed me the design I gave it no chance of working but as you demonstrated the design is very good at being scaled up.
you said exactly what i would say and more. words cannot describe my excitement!!!!!!!!!! i was excited enough to watch a guy saying he would build the first ever 1x2x7..yeah right this guy kicked his ass, he came back down to earth and he kicked his ass again harder and harder until he reached an anti gravitational space where he just wouldn't fall back down again haha
You ROCK INFINITY!!!!!!!!!!!!
if you were to sell this, how much would this cost, anyway?
Thanks for showing the telescoping. It really helped me understand--I'd been wondering how such a puzzle could exist!
Am I correct in thinking that this design could be warped into a disk shape, where there were six concentric, two-section rings on each side, instead of six pairs of similar-looking cube shapes? Maybe easier to design, but harder to turn.... Hmm and I guess it could be a sphere too, or a 2x13 Rubik's cube... haha look at me, I'm scaling the foothills of twisty-puzzle theory!
Bananadine 10 months ago
geen nederlands accent hoor...
MrDelirage 1 year ago
Can you ask Uwe Meffert to mass produce this puzzle? I really want to buy one.
tianyulu 1 year ago
@tianyulu If you really want to buy one, then just buy it. Of course it would be nice if someone else would invest several $10.000 to save you $100. But the world's market for this type of puzzles is limited, I am afraid ...
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
@OskarPuzzle
how many cubes do you have????
NeoCube9827 3 weeks ago
I love it. Same whith all the 1x2xn's. But why unlucky?
Berntisso 1 year ago
@Berntisso Some people associate the number 13 with unlucky
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
@OskarPuzzle and they are very wrong. 13 is my LUCKY number. and get this. Friday the 13th is the best day in the world
jumping4free 11 months ago
Oskar!, I watched this video twice... 1st time I was amazed by the close up to the telescopic design... 2nd time I was scared how you apply more force to twist it when it got stuck/locked... weren't you scared doing so??!! O_O
IncuManiac696 1 year ago
@IncuManiac696 Nylon is a very strong material, which is also true for 3D-printed nylon.
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
@OskarPuzzle $300 for this?
richard2mitchell 1 year ago
@richard2mitchell Please be so kind to read the description. It says "please do not mistake this for a cheap mass-produced puzzle". It is a one-of-a-kind prototype, that took a lot of money to create and produce.
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
@OskarPuzzle LOL right...... i make them for 45 bucks well mine is 1x2x10 not 13 it only takes me about 8 days to make it
richard2mitchell 1 year ago
I am assuming you have already patented all your puzzles. Market them and get them mass produced and get the frigging cost down!
A lot of them look cool, some of them look just too over engineered, I would probably buy some of them, but not for what they are priced at.
rustyscrapper 1 year ago
Nice cube! I really want one now!
Chyaman09 1 year ago
why does that piece of garbage cost 300$ it proberbly costet 10-15$ to make
Ramhams1337 1 year ago
@Ramhams1337 This puzzle was 3D-printed using nylon-powder SLS technology, which explains its price. It is the very first prototype, costing its designer and maker a lot of money to create. Please do not confuse it for a cheap mass-produced puzzle.
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
@OskarPuzzle i dont think anyone want to buy that anyway
Ramhams1337 1 year ago
@Ramhams1337 I have sold a few to expert collectors. Yes, there are those. It is a much cheaper hobby than collecting Rembrandts, and gives longer fun :-)
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
@Ramhams1337 you are a total n00b when it comes to this stuff it takes many hard hours to design the puzzle. To purchase this rare puzzle (only 2 known to be made) the shapeways company has to do a very tedious process to create the 3d models.
winsum4 1 year ago
@winsum4 Well, the Shapeways 3D-printing is fully automated. Still, it is an expensive machine with expensive material and expensive operation, including the post-3D-print cleaning to remove all the excess powder, and sorting the parts.
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
13?! no wonder it's unlucky
VCube100 1 year ago
design one where you can move the rotating point of the puzzle( if that is even possible)
jamiroleander 1 year ago
do you sell a lot of them??? because its the coolest!!
MrBakuganfan123 1 year ago
can you solve all these puzzles you make??? or do you just make them
grubby7911 1 year ago
@grubby7911 I can solve Unlucky Twist. Oskar
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago 3
its like a ciylinder with layers and a cut in half
Yorc1 1 year ago
@ccwtree It's by Leslie Le.
Look it up! :D
skewb40 1 year ago
@ccwtree 12x12x12 now.
skewb40 1 year ago
how does it stay together?
1c3f1r3741 1 year ago
@1c3f1r3741 A telescopic twisty-puzzle mechanism.
OskarPuzzle 1 year ago
very funny voice xD
and then twist and twist .... and do some more twists xD
pianoAUT 1 year ago
If Fisher is mod-god, than you're just twisty puzzles god!
jcz1996 2 years ago
i love that, cool ur coments at the end ;D XD
77zady77 2 years ago
I'd love to see one of these but x20+ rather than 13!! :D
^Just a small hint for you there Oskar!
PokefanDP 2 years ago
Yeah, you pwn Tony Fisher XD
NerdGradeA1 2 years ago
nice
Lancer667owns 2 years ago
umm not possible ? xxD youre the best^^
Rouricht 2 years ago
Those telescoping extensions looked paper thin. It's amazing that the puzzle doesn't just snap under it's own weight when you grab it by the end. What type of plastic did you use? It must have the strength of titanium to hold up like that...
stardust4ever 2 years ago
Oh I kinda forgot that part.
artman40 2 years ago
Bet so.
artman40 2 years ago
But 2x2x13 would be possible?
artman40 2 years ago
my god its hard to make an unlucky twist. i was able to make a 1x2x11 at most.
nkrasn11 2 years ago
i want to have it but its quite to expensive.. i would buy it for around 30-40 $
RubiksMods 2 years ago
proof of concept indeed, quite impressive
person15575129 2 years ago
i would buy it but i think your are selling for to much id buy one for $30 but $400!?
CreamLightPudin 2 years ago 3
Hmmm...so can similar design be used to make a 2x2x14?
artman40 2 years ago
can u sell me 1
cubescanfly 2 years ago
DESCRIPTION
geurgeury 2 years ago
Looks like mathematics is going out the window with some designs as of late.Amazing idea ;-)
Jo3Ach 2 years ago
That's incredible. I don't understand how it stays together!
qqwref2 2 years ago
Very nice! I'm very surprised as when you showed me the design I gave it no chance of working but as you demonstrated the design is very good at being scaled up.
TomPuzzle 2 years ago 5
awesome! I saw this on your site a while ago and was waiting to see you make it.
PotatoSpades22095 2 years ago 3
That's unbelievably smooth
kornfan140 2 years ago 20
Yikes!!!
I'm scared of your design skills, man!
Impressive stuff!
blizzardkb 2 years ago 25
D= .
Greeneyeskater93 2 years ago 5
thats amazing!
Drewseph0011 2 years ago 5
impressive.
neotoy 2 years ago 5
I feel honoured :D
olz91 2 years ago 4
OMFG
cubingforlife 2 years ago 4
you said exactly what i would say and more. words cannot describe my excitement!!!!!!!!!! i was excited enough to watch a guy saying he would build the first ever 1x2x7..yeah right this guy kicked his ass, he came back down to earth and he kicked his ass again harder and harder until he reached an anti gravitational space where he just wouldn't fall back down again haha
You ROCK INFINITY!!!!!!!!!!!!
if you were to sell this, how much would this cost, anyway?
jlspma 2 years ago 7
but mindstormscreator is young and he is awesome!
poptheman1 2 years ago
yeah the guy thats building a 1x2x7 designed it himself and he is quite young. i think like 11 but i could be wrong
philliescuber8 2 years ago
he's 11
poptheman1 2 years ago
thanks
philliescuber8 2 years ago
i meant 12 and go on skype
poptheman1 2 years ago