Added: 5 months ago
From: RajmanGamingHD
Views: 16,538
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (132)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • habla spanish pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee­eeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

  • Lol at 16:17

  • Where's that armor???

  • It looks better on Ps3 than 360. On pc it looks probally the best. But if you have a good graphics card. So get it on Ps3

  • 16:13 lolololololz

  • @CaptainSlow07

    i didnt know that can happen

  • Yes shotty looks really nice,..

  • Raj why haven't you use the armor that comes with the 'Anarchy Edition' of the game? If you do please make a video of it cause I also have the game early but don't have a clue how to wear it?

  • lousy textures. this is what carmack said about his game being the most beautiful this gen?? Fuck off.

  • @lcw1980 "megatextures" are not in yet, but when they are it textures will be magnificent. Trust me on this one i have seen testing of these so called megatextures.

  • Lmao!! Loosum Hagar has a body! Good Job Carmack. Rajman gave her the once over @ 3:00

  • I've noticed, that when you reduce the size of video playback from fullscreen to normal, the lighting and graphic detail really shines. Frankly, anything ID Software releases is graphically phenomenal. I'm sure playing this game natively at home on the PS3 is nothing short of sexy. Rajman, how are the graphics?

  • Where's the armor???

  • @MrRknox1986 At roughly 1:26, you can see the ark armor added to the inventory.

  • Why do they need medical supplies, if they've got regenerating health?

  • wooooooooooooooooooooow they did a fantastic job on that shotguns design. it looks amazing.

  • why post apocalyptic chicks are all hot? ^_^

  • I'm going to put this in perspective. I have borderlands on pc, with everything turned up high on a 5850 video and 1920x1080 resolution, the game will stutter when you go by a segment with lots of terrain and detail everywhere. This game has a larger amount of detail and more terrain, walk anywhere and its still 60fps with no hiccups. There is detail everywhere, the level design is insane as if someone hand drawn the whole world.

  • NO, they didn't, the only thing that is the same is the TEXTURES, nothing else. You have no idea what you are saying I'm afraid. You could not be further from the truth! PC gaming is not what it used to be, but it's making a comeback. This game for the PC also comes with a SDK meaning we can make mods to make it look and play better. You need to get your eyes checked if you think that the games are going to look exactly the same from a graphical point(not artistic).

  • Omg at 16:14 totally wasn't expecting that. LMAO.

  • @MaximumAnime Buckle up for safety!

  • @Grantasmagoria I agree that id are technical and programming geniuses, but they can't bridge the gap between a current console and a current gaming PC.

  • @NickJDay Fuck the graphics. Just shut up and play the fucking game on whatever you have. Shit.

  • @rep5281 The argument was about how console hardware can't compete with PC hardware. So mind your own business.

  • @NickJDay I know what the argument was about. I can read, shitrag. If you don't want people replying to you, then don't post on a public forum, monkey.

  • @rep5281 Ok Mr. Internet Tough Guy. How about having a hint of respect?

  • You liking it so far?

  • knew it was gonna be better on pc ... i know id ... the bodies wont disappear on pc 

  • @XxWolfpack247xX id Software has somehow managed to bridge the gap between the PC and the PS3 while using the same high-res graphics using the “super texture” pack running at 60fps!

  • @nicknasty14 By bridge the gap do you mean the lower resolution, slower texture rendering, lower detail distance, lower particle density and no AA? By god they've done it!

  • @NickJDay Apparently they just did my friend. Whos gonna notice much difference anyways. PC games these days usually only have about 5% advantage over console games, so does it even really matter? Enjoy the game on pc, 360 and ps3. Who really cares. Gonna go fire the game up in a few.

  • @nicknasty14 No, they didn't. Developers that put a good amount of time into PC development can make it look many times better then the console counterparts. I don't know where you got 5% from, but that's malarkey, the only time where I can see there being a 5% increase is when there is just a straight up port. Lowest common denominator developing isn't making the platforms equal.

  • @NickJDay Yes, they did. I can send you the article if you like? You have no idea what you are saying im afraid. You could not be further from the truth! PC gaming is not what it used to be.

  • Id? more disappearing dead enemies like in Doom 3? COME ON!

  • this is not rpg?

  • The PS3 only has 256MB of VRAM btw.

  • @NickJDay

    The 360 has faster access to memory, But the PS3 has more space to actually carry all of that memory.

    Seeing how it's on 3 discs for 360 (for space), and and 8 gig install for PS3 (for faster access). They both have their faults.

  • @CaIamlty That has nothing to do with VRAM. It can't render as much because of the lower VRAM the GPU has.

  • @CaIamlty Actually the ps3 has faster memory. On spec sheets they add in the eDRAM to the total memory speed and that memory is insignificant for actual game code, its more of a specialized frame buffer. eDRAM is extremely fast by the way. GDDR3 is ok, but the RAMBUS memory on ps3 is very fast. The next AMD radeon card will use rambus memory instead of GDDR3. RAMBUS has a reputation though of having a huge amount of errors, thats why they aren't used in pc's anymore.

  • 03:06 LOL and HOT!!

  • 20:45 Enemies respawn (those 3 same ones from 11:46)? Like Far Cry 2?

    Damn.

  • "i only been awake 10 fucking minutes and you people running me around like a damn slave."

  • I seriously don't understand how people can call this game "generic" and "ugly". This is easily one of the best looking games I have seen since Crysis 2, the art style and atmosphere is phenomenal. Were people so in awe with Borderlands and Fallout 3 that any game after with a wasteland will never come close? its f**king ridiculous how lame borderlands was, I can understand Fallout but Borderlands was awful, it was a lame attempt at an MMO style RPG that had no story and looked like a Wii game.

  • @luevanoanthony actually borderlands was great fun. The artstyle fit great and it was meant as a co-op game of a total of 4 players. It was more like Diablo meets FPS instead of mmo in my opinion.

  • @ginonijssen It wasn't anything like diablo, because Diablo involves a lot of math worked into how the skills work and how weapons work. Borderlands fails at the same sort of math, there's no deep calculation under the hood and the game shipped in an incredibly broken state.

  • @luevanoanthony EXCATLY!!!!!

    i do get why people like games like borderlands...its just odd to me, this game is one of my favorite of all time

  • @luevanoanthony I have to disagree, I really liked borderlands, but that doesn't mean I hate this game. In fact this game is on my top 10 list. I thought borderlands had a really good style to it. I see where you're coming from though. They need to give this game a chance, but I think borderlands was a good game too. 

  • Xbox 360 looks better!!

  • @Zephol agreed

  • Comment removed

  • @Zephol Well the Xbox 360 version doesn't look better you bigot fanboy. Considering the PS3 has a better GPU and CPU, it's literally impossible for the Xbox version to look better. Your argument is invalid.

  • @Shread92 Actually based on how the games engine focuses on megatextures, the 512MB of video ram on the xbox could make it look better, but I don't know if that is fact.

  • @NickJDay Shit that's actually a good point, I stand corrected. However, the Playstation version does run smoother. Well it seems that way in demonstrations that I have see. As the 360 may be able to have 'better' textures but running them is another matter.

  • @Shread92 There is another video on here with 360 gameplay and they run completely the same.

  • @Shread92 The cpu is very good on ps3, but the AMD gpu on the 360 is actually more powerful than the Nvidia gpu in the ps3. Unified shaders is missing from the ps3 gpu completely.

  • @Shread92 no it doesn't. ps3's gpu is on par with 7600gt gpu shich is 6 years old compared to 360's xenos chip which is based on ATI Radeon X1900/X1950 series, both gpu's peformance are nearly identical with slight differentials depending on which game the system is using, most games use dx9 which is a microsoft devtool tha most devs use when making multiplat games which generally means most multiplat games look and peform slightly better on 360 when comparing the consoles.

  • @5686darryl although i think rage is using open gl which is different to dx9

  • @5686darryl Nope the Ps3 gpu is more powerful than the 360's Gpu. Which is 6years old. While Ps3's is only 5 years of age. And other things but I don't feel like getting into that.

  • @boobyricky50

    performance wise both gpus are the same look for any benchmark and you'll see.

  • @5686darryl You could say that ut Ps3's Gpu is more powerful. Nvidia Synthesyizer is

  • @L3gion3578 I played it on PS3, my close-up textures were glorious. GLORIOUS I say. But we'll see. Can't wait till Monday night, Dark Souls + Rage = failing grade in all course assignments for the week. Stupid college, taking away time from important things.

  • @TheMercsAssassin

    Dumb american faggot!

  • @Xettrix um.... what'd I do? U mad bro? Burgers, America Fries! Freedom Burgers!!! AHH YEA! WARZ!!!! Hawt cars!!! big Big BIG!!! America ROCKS! OHH YEA BURGERS!

    Lol. But seriously, what'd we do this time?

  • I'm not being a fanboy, but the xbox version does look better. Textures and everything.

  • thank you raj now i am going to get this game for the pc.

  • Good thing I'm watching you play... Now, I know there's a bad-ass shotgun in the standard game.

  • Comment removed

  • Hey Rajman, have you played it on 360 too? I am fortunate to have both consoles and was wondering which one looks the best? If they're equal I'll just get the PS3 one so I don't have to change disc 3 times for a 15 hour game.

    Thanks for uploading this awesome vids! The gameplay looks fantastic and the art direction looks cool.

  • 16:14 AAAAAAAUAUAUA! GAY....

  • @Anton1987RU HAHAHAHA, that was funny as hell... had to watch it 3 times!!!

  • lol 12:00.. ''Wingsti.....''

  • Comment removed

  • "wingst... ouh!" Bahahahaha. Fantastic vid!

  • 10:58

    weioijdcoem almost dead eofinifjeifj

    *using bandage

    ALL DANDY

  • the npcs animations remind me of infamous 1

  • @DrugMan24 lol, they're no where near that bad. They just stand in one spot when they talk, inFAMOUS one the animations looked weird plus they didn't move around. This is much better. hahaha.

  • @TheMercsAssassin do you see them moving around?because i don't and their animations don't look natural at all

  • @DrugMan24 let me rewatch...

  • @DrugMan24 ok, yea they seem stiff because their lower body doesn't move, but its no where near as bad as inFAMOUS 1. Could be better though, yea. Not as bad as Deus Ex Human Rev. either.

  • @TheMercsAssassin i never said it was like infamous i just said it reminded me of infamous because whether you like it or not they are very reminiscent

  • @DrugMan24 Oh i'm not saying the good by any means either. Lol. I wonder how this game's story will turn out. Is id known for stories or just gameplay?

  • @TheMercsAssassin usually gameplay but this game looks like it has a good story to.

  • @TheMercsAssassin gameplay

  • 20:56 = 11:58

  • what do u think Raj, get It or not?

  • the game is still looks awesome even that texture problems but the gameplay is so fucking good

  • its like a combination of NPCs from Borderlands with the humor of the NPCs from demons souls... XD

  • game reminds me of jak 2 + a bit of fallout and borderlands. loosum hagar FTW!

  • Looks awesome. Probably have to wait for Christmas but definitely getting it

  • the texture popup is kinda annoying

  • doom 3 came out last gen on xbox 1 but looked like it could be an xbox 360 game now ID software release RAGE in last year for this gen of consoles and it looks like a next gen game

    john carmack is a wizard

  • 11:58 was just beautiful!

  • My girl likes to play with my wingstick

  • What's a wing stick?

  • @core11285 its like a tomahawk that you throw like a boomerang in this game.

  • ok the texture popping is getting irritating. i was expecting more man.

  • @victorian4j too bad thats what you get from ps3

  • @MrScarcrow its doubtful that 360 will be much better, but we'll see soon enough.

  • Loosum Hagar.. HAWT!

  • FUUCK WANT THIS GAME!!!!

  • Insane art and graphics. It looks a generation above anything else...amazing that it's running so smoothe on 6 year old consoles. Animations really impressive

  • Insane art and graphics. It looks a generation above anything else...amazing that it's running so smoothe on 6 year old consoles.

  • @16:13 epic fail xD

  • im gonna get this on tuesday, anyone who wants to play co op in it add me on psn: itachiboy666

  • the driving reminds me of duke nukem forever

  • Graphics dont look too good, lot of texture pop in, no trolling intended

  • @larzinator1988 From what i 've seen so far, these graphics are alot better than both battlefield 3 and crysis.

    Texture.. pop in bullshit is cause this game is massive as fuck running on 6 year old hardware.

  • @Vleesball im not trolling, just stating a fact that texture pop in on the ps3 looks like a serious problem, if you say that is bullshit than you clearly did not look at the video

  • @larzinator1988 i 'm looking past that. My brain is powerful enough to not care about pitty things like that.

    And i know you're not trolling considering you're 100 per cent RIGHT.

  • @Vleesball you can't be serious about Crysis 2? Did you play that game? That was the most realistic console game graphics-wise that exist. The textures, even when you were staring at them at reach-out-and touch distance, they were still uber detailed. Not saying it looked "better" than Killzone 3 or Uncharted 2 or 3, but it does look most realistic.

    Rage has very blurry textures up close for the most part.

  • And its not very massive at all. Yes it is open world, but the id has stated multiple times that it is only about a 15 hour experience. Crysis 2 was 15 hours one play through for me. Uncharted 2 was about 10-12. Not that big of a game.

    Gameplay looks really fun though and I like the level design quite a bit. Enemies seem interesting to fight.

  • @TheMercsAssassin crysis 2 is a 5 hour game u silly...only 7GB's big... not even focused on single player as it wanted to compete against HALO.

    Rage is 22GB's.. obviously MASSIVE.

    Most people will most likely complete Rage in about 25-30 hours.. you included considering u did 15 hours on a 5 hour game :s

  • @Vleesball haha. I hope it stretches out longer for me. With Crysis I played on the second to highest difficulty rather than normal. And yea I do generaelly take my time with games and die very little. With Crysis 2, in particular, I would take the time to fully scout out every area and comepletely plan my approach and escape from each combat scenario. I'd plan which gaurds I'd take out first and how I would, often with stealth at first and then tortured the last few with mind tricks :)

  • @Vleesball hope rage does last me longer than the projected 15, yea 20 - 30 would be a nice sweet spot. Looking at the trophies/achievements for it, it looks like good incentive to play it at least twice, and I found out that the co-op missions, Legends of the Waste, can be completed solo, although the devs said its quite hard. I look forward to the challenge though.

  • @Vleesball When people say "massive" i think of Skyrim. Or Dark Souls, or Red Dead, Assassin's Creed. I didn't know we were only talking about file size. Sure, from a file size perspective it is pretty large.

  • raj, are you indian?

  • @MrOvaltineMan dont u like indians??

  • @harvey19801 where did that come from? lol of course i like indians

  • Checking out the ladies aren't you Raj? lol

  • 16:14 LOL 

  • LOL @ 3:05. RAJ you perv xD

  • Looks good for PS3 version not sure if I'm buying it though Sorry Carmack =(

    I just want something like Quake I =)

  • so raj, what you think of the game so far? good or bad?

  • wow looks great

  • Pretty stoked for this game to come out ....

  • Looks good.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more