the irony of the frequent flyer ad was not lost on me, nor is the inattention of the crowd on the speakers.
Ultimatly there is no allowance for corrupted data- its a fail, "climate science consensus" like this "debate' is a political rable, this woman is not informed nor is she in a debate, lolz crediblity fail... Climate consensus advocates drive and endorse aersosl geoengineering which theyve, for a profit, contaminated every corner of earth,
No data was covered up or manipulated and the CRU scientists were cleared, by an independent inquiry, of any scientific malpractice or misconduct. This Sarah has a good head on her shoulders. If only Palin wasn't such an idiot.
@nuffzed That's only half true at best - in fact only three peer-review processes were investigated and could not prove misconduct by individuals amongst their colleagues. The inquiry found the scientists were "defensive and critical" and "misleading."
Data was an infinitesimal thing??? Who are these morons? The letters clearly show that the data was either modified or completely made up! How is that infinitesimal???
Oh but a celebrity said it... they must be right...
Here's a newsflash: talented comedians can make awful debate-moderators (not least for the kind of audience they attract).
mlawren7 2 months ago
the irony of the frequent flyer ad was not lost on me, nor is the inattention of the crowd on the speakers.
Ultimatly there is no allowance for corrupted data- its a fail, "climate science consensus" like this "debate' is a political rable, this woman is not informed nor is she in a debate, lolz crediblity fail... Climate consensus advocates drive and endorse aersosl geoengineering which theyve, for a profit, contaminated every corner of earth,
i actually feel sorry for her
WellSightedGentleman 5 months ago
No data was covered up or manipulated and the CRU scientists were cleared, by an independent inquiry, of any scientific malpractice or misconduct. This Sarah has a good head on her shoulders. If only Palin wasn't such an idiot.
nuffzed 1 year ago
@nuffzed That's only half true at best - in fact only three peer-review processes were investigated and could not prove misconduct by individuals amongst their colleagues. The inquiry found the scientists were "defensive and critical" and "misleading."
mlawren7 2 months ago
"The fact is that the data was this infinite little fraction in a giant giant lie about evidences"
isocrate27 1 year ago
Amanda Little is an environmental journalist? she sounds more like an advocate. and she is not very well informed.
kchuk1965 1 year ago
Bull. Shit.
thisvigilantguardian 1 year ago
Data was an infinitesimal thing??? Who are these morons? The letters clearly show that the data was either modified or completely made up! How is that infinitesimal???
Oh but a celebrity said it... they must be right...
LazyCoder 1 year ago 2
Sarah Silverman is not dopey. What she's saying here is true, and this clip shows that she's as smart as ever.
hungmunchkin 1 year ago
Wow, I never knew how dopey Sarah Silverman was. She buys this phoney green shit?
cano21 1 year ago