applesoldier is right when he says time is money. So is stability, meaning less downtime for Macs as they are less virus prone and you don't need to call the repair guy in frequently
Pro studios have Macs generally speaking, Not PCs
I'm OK with PCs. I've no hostility to them. I owned them, however, I require stability and I can't get that with PCs
No system under a grand will kick the crap out of any Mac, not just a Mac pro, any Mac.
Mac's can game. The problem. . . THERE'S NO CODERS FOR MAC OUT THERE. So I hate that people use that cheap ass excuse for Windows being better than Mac.
@Rifalltoo There's a lot of games for the Mac, Steam even allows direct download of games for mac now. The problem is that Mac's don't support high end graphics cards. They don't support SLI or Crossfire. They don't support many propitiatory gaming standards like DirectX, Nvidia's Cuda and PhysX. No serious gamer is going to use a Mac if they lose all these features. And no developers are going to use open standards and lose the benefits of all these propitiatory development tools.
@arthmus01 True but dude you need to realize that Blizzard for the past 10 years are using macs to mostly create their games. They test and make their games on both Direct X and Open GL. I mean besides the coding and programing everything is created on macs, the whole art team (Warcraft, Starcraft, Diablo). Yeah I agree that their is no support for SLI/Crossfire, Nvidia's Cuda and PhysX, but Open GL is just as good as DirectX.
@yzak100 I don't know who told you that, but it's nonsense. On the Autodesk 3ds Max website there's a video showcase from Blizzard about how they used 3ds Max for all their 3d work on WoW. 3ds Max is only available on Windows, and is one of the most popular 3d modelling software in the video game industry.
@yzak100 Also OpenGL is only a graphics API, comparable to Direct3d, which is one component of DirectX. There are open source alternatives for all DirectX components, like OpenAL for DirectSound, or OpenCL for DirectCompute. All written in different languages and all without support. For most game developers the convenience of having it all in one collection designed to integrate perfectly with eachother and fully supported by the manufacturer outweighs the cost.
@arthmus01 I am sure that they enjoy implementing their games on macs, other wise they wouldn't really support macs at all. I know blizzard tries their best to get monopolies on the PC world. I also know that Apple has a Different API that's based on Open GL, but it really isn't. I am sure apple know the fuss over the fact that steam is now for macs and that mac gaming is growing everyday. Maybe in Lion they will add a graphic engine that is all put together instead of scattered.
To be fair, he probably thinks professional as in Hollywood Post Production houses and studios.
That is a type of profession but I'm suck that people assume and lump that Hollywood is professional and anything else is amateur and not real professional work. If you have a boss, if you have clients, they pay you for your service(s) You ARE a Professional. Hollywood tends to do things on a larger scale but it doesn't mean others are not professional too, it's so stupid lol.
Lol he constantly talks about "Dual gigabyte Ethernet" if he knew anything he would know that 1gig is completely and utterly unused, the highest your ever going to be receiving is ~500meg??
Probably not even that, In 90% of the world the net runs at 5-10 mbs maximum.
adobepc is not talking in circles macs cant game, because YOU DONT HAVE direct x, open gl works, BUT ITS NOT THE SAME! look at crysis, oh wait you dont have crysis for mac
Who needs crysis for Macs, tried it on my friends Gateway and didn't like it... don't say cuz the res sucked cuz I don't care about res, I just didn't like it.
first of all i have a MAC pro not the laptop version but i still use XP... for some programs that i need... because the developers not developing for Mac... i say this because you think im going to buy crappy dell, gateway, sony, etc... laptops or desktops they've screwed me for the last time.....i ordered something from them and they gave me something different.... or not all the specs that i ordered...
o.o wtf is wrong with that guy.... even if im a pc i agree with applesoldier. guy doesnt know what hes talking about. lol cigarette. try djarum black before theyre gonna be illegal... cuz obama.
I own both but primarily I am a PC guy too, and you are right. Applesoldier is not a stupid person, I may not agree with what he says but he is pretty smart and he is definately right here. You also got to give the guy credit for his tutorials, he is a major contributor (tutorial wise) and its nice of him to donate his time to help others out. Frankly, we need more people like him around here.
its funny cuz you guys get really into the commercials im a PC.... so your a personal computer well i have one.... a PC is a PC whether it be a mac or windows or ubunto.... hahahahaha
Not legally, and with complications. Apple would make naff all money selling OSX on it's own to install on any old hardware. They make their money on the hardware sales. Their current business model is VERY profitable. A study just came out that says they make 49% of every dollar spent on computers in the US. Quite impressive for a company who's OS share is only what, 5-10% (depending where you look). Those profit margins make their competition jizz their pants.
Software. OSX makes better use of the hardware than Windows does. You get more power for less hardware with a Mac. OSX is just superior at resource management. Think how Vista/7 need more power than XP to do the same tasks, same deal with OSX and Windows in general, they're just coded more efficiently (granted the time gap between releases comes into play with XP and Vista/7). An old G4 Mac can run Leopard (not Snow Leopard) perfectly fine, 2007 OS on 1999 hardware. Impressive optimisation.
I have a feeling it's because of the way the Architecture in a Xeon (which is still Intel) has been designed to run efficiently under heavy load which usually is almost always happening in servers as people would constantly be accessing them.
you would have to ask a video professional who uses them on a daily basis. I haven't had the luxury to render and edit in HD on a Xeon 8 core/Quad core work station yet. However just from a quick test run at the Apple store for the 8 core Mac Pro running Final Cut, I re-rendered the Demo ad which is HD in the store and it crunched that thing in a matter of seconds. vs if it was my Dual core machine it would take me probably 5 minutes ish
I'm not getting wht people still think custombuilds are the same as a MacPro. It's NOT, If you want to compare the MacPro to something it should be compared to another WORKSTATION because THAT'S WHAT IS IS!!!
And BTW, yeah I know adobePC was comparing his PC to a mac pro! But that is the whole reason why emeek is laughing at him for not comparing apples to apples. The EMEEK video was comparing PC to iMAC, NOT PC to MAC PRO. Can you understand? lol
If you want to compare the Mac pro to a custom built PC, I will agree that the mac pro is overpriced. But the 27 inch iMac cannot be beat for the price.
Yes finally we agree the 27inch Imac is Great value I did not mean to offend you i was just stating in relation to the video this is insulting that a custom built PC will own the crap out of a Mac Pro however yes I agree there exsists nothing that rivals the Imac 27inch not even close.
Hmmmm i am sorry Applesoilder but you fail yet again
1.The Gt 220 is actually roughly on par with your HD3870
2.Please dont keep on going back to the Xeon argument they are not completely diffrent CPU's The i7 and Xeon are roughly on par,you can also buy a Xeon if you really want it's all about chioce.
3.tell me how much ram are you using in your mac pro I imagine nowhere near 32gb i imagine by the time 32gb is the standard your CPU will be a piece of shit.
Yeah but to do a fair comparison, you need to factor in the display. So basically, your system cost more than the equivalent iMac. The difference is your video card and an extra 2 gigs of ram. You can get the iMac up to 8gigs of ram for 200 more, which is still less than your price.
I am sorry you must have not watched AdobePC's video (watch?v=oXHyxj7OHVo) the video is clearly a comparison with the Mac Pro,I actually like the Imac its great value but i personally dont like all in one's.
I am comparing it to the MAC PRO without the display, have you even seen the video this is a response to and if i really wanted i could put in a Radeon HD 4850 just like the Imac which is -£220 off the price but that is not the point I am comparing this to THE MAC PRO play this video in HD go fullscreen and read the name of the video FFS.
What i think AdobePC is trying to do, is just talk about his system compared the iMac.
Yet it was the the wrong video to repond to adobe pc, because emeek wanst making a system he wanted. He was making a pc system that was comparable to the imac.
So yeah either way your fucking stupid for posting your irrelevant video to his.
adobePC could've done better. Why did you choose such a cheap GPU. I don't understand what your video response was even about. Also why do people compare consumer PC's with Mac Pro's. Do you guys understand that the Mac Pro is a workstation. Just like Dell and HP's Business grade PC's, you don't compare a alienware to Dell workstation, it's not the same category.
Again total agreement. Just for the sake of it I'd like to mention the more RAM slots you use the more bandwidth will be used on your motherboard and since he recommended a hit motherboard.
I agree. Everyone knows applesoldier hacked the crap out of my video. This is just pure BS from start to finish. Like Koasum3 stated it is not worth watching.
I love the thinking in these vids that more cost = automatically means better performace and longevity. The xeon gibbering is also hilarious, its an i7 with the option to be paired with another i7, nothing more...
Performance wise choosing an i7 2.66 (£210) vs a xeon 2.66 (around £1000) is pointless as the perfomance difference (which is negligable) doesnt justify the massive price hike.
adobePC is just a cock, don't worry about this guy hehehe.
he is just a joke seriously at least Zoul has useful facts with his arguments and is well worth arguing with but adobePC just owns himself which just makes him just a cock talking absolute shit.
Did you see how he was purposefully cutting off your video at one point before you finished saying "Mac Pro". This whole video is just a setup to twist words from the beginning. Not worth watching the rest of the vids if hes doesnt know what exactly you are comparing your system to.
I got one word for adobePC. OWNED! HE FAILS AT COMMUNICATION! He doesn't even fucking understand what your saying. SPEC for SPEC PRICE comparison! Not a what you want vs. what an iMac is. WTF IS THIS GUY ON? OMFG Eric. Holly shit, how much can one person fucking fail on communication? I've gone nuts before, but I don't fail on communication of a simple spec for spec comparison. OMFG, OWNED!
I think it's quite obvious AdobePC, that you're comparison were inconsistent, were you comparing your GoodWill specials to a MacPro, or an iMac, c'mon which is it now? So far the only one who butchered your video was you.
I think he lives in a special dream world where movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, Lord of the RIngs, transformers, etc etc etc all are rendered and edited and composited on cheap old sub 1000$ PCs.
Hahahaaa hell i might pick me up one of those dream machines and produce something on the level of anyone one of those movies probably could do it in a few weeks with a system of that caliber !
They aren't rendered on Macs, thats for sure. Take Pixar for example, their render farm is *nix, not Mac. Hate to break this to you, but for the most part its all Windows and Unix (or Linux).
I was saying that adobePC thinks that movies of that caliber can be created on his cheap ass PC. You need thousands of servers if you want to get anything done for something of that magnitude.
Pixar has and uses macs, just not for the render farm. Pixar still also uses Avid and Maya 64 bit (on Windows). I remember the 1980's when Pixar also used Amiga's around the time of Luxo Jr (Amiga was the _BEST_ video PC out there).
lol of course Pixar uses macs, as well as Windows. In real life all companies (mainly large ones) all use both Macs and PC's. It's quite shocking for both side of the crowd to realize that.
But hey looks like your a pretty sensible guy so it's good to know there are people out their with their head on straight :D
Well I own both PC's and Macs... Some of my PC's have Windows, others have Linux. At work I primarily use Windows, when I worked at Adobe I used both of course.
your still an idiot you know that right? because its a fact. its like comparing an orange to an apple ... lets compare an air plane ta a car next because you know they're both modes of travel .. wow
There are no boundaries in your dumb statement that a 500$ pc can not own a 2400$ mac. you never said whether it had to be a laptop to a laptop or a desktop to a desktop. Since your a piece of shit mac fag, you believe more money always equals faster machine. that is far from the truth, only a stupid mac fanboy lemming believes that. Windows is bundled with more features than Mac Osx, to get the apple equivalent features would be another 500$ attached to the price if you only buy apple.
I've used windows for almost 17 years and I use mac os x , I've had ever PC you can imagine but still changed to a mac so my opinion is alot more educated then yours resorting to calling someone a fag .. nice your cool thumbs up enjoy your 500$ dream machine :)
nic ei love the internet i can say whatever I'm 23 years old but ive used a windows machine for 35 years I have 100 pc's 25 mac's and a super computer and i know what im talking about blah blah blah look seriously if you have an opinion state it move on no need to keep puking out your mouth if your bored and want to argue go find a 12 year old and enjoy your time but as for me i dont have the time for you, have fun with your 500$ dream machine :)
good for you :) .. it still missing feature sets comes with crappy components and runs .. WINDOWS! yay i run both flawlessly so yup ... good for you go build that 500 dream machine and enjoy it fun time whooo yeahh awesome! fun anyways dont bother responding because this is a waste of time and i wont :)
Windows sucks because Why? its compatible, has the best software available for it, and has been rock solid for me with Windows 7. on a mac you have limited software, and hardware available and performance is worse than Windows applications. your mac is mass produced like any oem Pc. There are Oem's that produce higher quality machines than Apple, and most of the time a good custom build will beat a mac in terms of quality, price, and performance.
dude im talking about the platform not software avaible for it , by your logic linux sucks because it doesnt have good apps , but anyone who tried it knows it rapes windows in speed and memory
i suggest you watch applesoldier's video about hp envy , maybe you will get it : hp has alot of laptops with the same specs but this one is alot more expensive , but why? because of the quality and design it has been made with
I can run apps that are ten years old on Windows 7, can you do that on your intel mac without third party software? Whats the point of an operating system if you have to use apps you don't want? Linux is better as a HPC server, but is it better than Windows at every single area compared to Windows? not really. Hp is overpriced like Apple, that is all there is to say. its not "Quality", it's just overpriced for higher profit margins because its not going to be a big hit seller..
what 10 year old app? if they were written for windows obviously it will , just like you cant run cocoa apps on your windows can you
what intel mac ? did i ever say i have a mac , because i sadly dont
in osx there arent many apps , but most of them are good apps not like the 1000000 windows app that do the exactly same thing , almost all windows apps have an equivalent in osx or linux
whats the point of hp overpricing something , you think that one laptop can be even compared to an plastic pc
I am saying you can't run most of the applications from Os9 on a intel mac, compatibility is really bad.
I own two PPc macs, macs are overrated.
not all have a equivalent, and usually I can find a good freeware app for Windows. Hp can overprice because they can, just like how Apple overprices. Autocad for Windows, 3ds Max, Photoshop currently is better on Windows, Etc
Even today, I still watch this video and, I personally, think that guy is the worst "professional" I've ever seen. (AdobePC sucks)
supercounterstrike1 1 month ago
applesoldier is right when he says time is money. So is stability, meaning less downtime for Macs as they are less virus prone and you don't need to call the repair guy in frequently
Pro studios have Macs generally speaking, Not PCs
I'm OK with PCs. I've no hostility to them. I owned them, however, I require stability and I can't get that with PCs
alanbstard4 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Do you really not have anything else to do!
MGApcPro 1 year ago
No system under a grand will kick the crap out of any Mac, not just a Mac pro, any Mac.
Mac's can game. The problem. . . THERE'S NO CODERS FOR MAC OUT THERE. So I hate that people use that cheap ass excuse for Windows being better than Mac.
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
@Rifalltoo There's a lot of games for the Mac, Steam even allows direct download of games for mac now. The problem is that Mac's don't support high end graphics cards. They don't support SLI or Crossfire. They don't support many propitiatory gaming standards like DirectX, Nvidia's Cuda and PhysX. No serious gamer is going to use a Mac if they lose all these features. And no developers are going to use open standards and lose the benefits of all these propitiatory development tools.
arthmus01 1 year ago
@arthmus01 True but dude you need to realize that Blizzard for the past 10 years are using macs to mostly create their games. They test and make their games on both Direct X and Open GL. I mean besides the coding and programing everything is created on macs, the whole art team (Warcraft, Starcraft, Diablo). Yeah I agree that their is no support for SLI/Crossfire, Nvidia's Cuda and PhysX, but Open GL is just as good as DirectX.
yzak100 1 year ago
@yzak100 I don't know who told you that, but it's nonsense. On the Autodesk 3ds Max website there's a video showcase from Blizzard about how they used 3ds Max for all their 3d work on WoW. 3ds Max is only available on Windows, and is one of the most popular 3d modelling software in the video game industry.
arthmus01 1 year ago
@yzak100 Also OpenGL is only a graphics API, comparable to Direct3d, which is one component of DirectX. There are open source alternatives for all DirectX components, like OpenAL for DirectSound, or OpenCL for DirectCompute. All written in different languages and all without support. For most game developers the convenience of having it all in one collection designed to integrate perfectly with eachother and fully supported by the manufacturer outweighs the cost.
arthmus01 1 year ago
@arthmus01 I am sure that they enjoy implementing their games on macs, other wise they wouldn't really support macs at all. I know blizzard tries their best to get monopolies on the PC world. I also know that Apple has a Different API that's based on Open GL, but it really isn't. I am sure apple know the fuss over the fact that steam is now for macs and that mac gaming is growing everyday. Maybe in Lion they will add a graphic engine that is all put together instead of scattered.
yzak100 1 year ago
the gt 220 is one of the slowest card out there
iphone3gs78 1 year ago
You talk a lot about "professionals" for someone that admitted that you're not one.
Learn something about the industry, grow up, do some research, then come back and talk to us about whats professional.
FoodMoTron3k 1 year ago 3
@FoodMoTron3k
To be fair, he probably thinks professional as in Hollywood Post Production houses and studios.
That is a type of profession but I'm suck that people assume and lump that Hollywood is professional and anything else is amateur and not real professional work. If you have a boss, if you have clients, they pay you for your service(s) You ARE a Professional. Hollywood tends to do things on a larger scale but it doesn't mean others are not professional too, it's so stupid lol.
KeibearsProperty 1 year ago
@KeibearsProperty
CORRECTION: It should read,
That is a type of profession but I'm SICK not suck lol*
KeibearsProperty 1 year ago
"This one is addressing the 27" iMac."
What's the title of the video, and all that you've been talking about? Make a video of a custom build vs. the Mac Pro. You will fail, hard.
paradoxGFX 1 year ago
AppleSoldier, Keep up the video uploads. Good stuff.
pcfix411 1 year ago 3
gaming is definently coming to mac. steam is coming this april FTW!
playoffplaya 1 year ago
Emeek lets make a gaming company catered to the opengl side of things
or anyone for that matter who wants to join in
MasaruGamer 2 years ago
@MasaruGamer Sure, I'll learn coding on the side and join in.
Let's all make a better flash plugin for Mac, because I think Adobe is purposely making flash for Mac bad.
Rifalltoo 1 year ago
adobe pc is stupid as shit
jstettin1007 2 years ago 9
Comment removed
TheNotepadGeek 1 year ago
@jstettin1007 ...How?
AveragelifeofKai 1 year ago
LOL ATI 4850 gpu. Piece of crap. and macs cant game
PCtechtips101 2 years ago
YOUTUBE UPLOAD LIMITS SUCK
logbperry 2 years ago 11
imac 27 inch is AMAZING! screw what hes runnin
p4intb4llfr3akm4n 2 years ago
watch?v=CK7me2Rw4w0
xtreme404 2 years ago
what game does mac has????
apple soldier never used a real pc!
xtreme404 2 years ago
wow and warcraft 3 FTW :D
or better run windows along with osx and run any game -.-
xleo21 2 years ago
pc $1000 mac $2400 $0 hackenstoh
maybe $3 for a dullayrer dvd and cdr!
hahahahahahahhahHAHH!!!!!!!
xtreme404 2 years ago
we can upgrade pc to have 4 video cards to play a single game!
you cant beat that mac mother fucker!!!
we play hard!!!
watch?v=CK7me2Rw4w0
--- we can run fucking mac osx 10.6.2 on a pc !! i have it on a dell d1505 laptop! hahahahahah!! sucks!!!
xtreme404 2 years ago
is he using ie who uses ie thats asking to get a virus
therealdandan 2 years ago
Lol he constantly talks about "Dual gigabyte Ethernet" if he knew anything he would know that 1gig is completely and utterly unused, the highest your ever going to be receiving is ~500meg??
Probably not even that, In 90% of the world the net runs at 5-10 mbs maximum.
DeanWhipper 2 years ago
adobepc is not talking in circles macs cant game, because YOU DONT HAVE direct x, open gl works, BUT ITS NOT THE SAME! look at crysis, oh wait you dont have crysis for mac
TheTrvStr 2 years ago
Macs can't game is a debunked myth. PCs don't game better, they just game MORE, there's a big difference.
Coraxuss 2 years ago
Who needs crysis for Macs, tried it on my friends Gateway and didn't like it... don't say cuz the res sucked cuz I don't care about res, I just didn't like it.
ChaoticSasuke 2 years ago
when will PC people and MAC people grow up GOSH!!!! there fucking computers.....
doh11 2 years ago
They're*
SunriseInTheMidwest 2 years ago
Hey emeek, I guess for gigs is plenty for those still running XP. LOL Because I'm sure he doesn't NEED Windows 7.
SunriseInTheMidwest 2 years ago
first of all i have a MAC pro not the laptop version but i still use XP... for some programs that i need... because the developers not developing for Mac... i say this because you think im going to buy crappy dell, gateway, sony, etc... laptops or desktops they've screwed me for the last time.....i ordered something from them and they gave me something different.... or not all the specs that i ordered...
doh11 2 years ago
o.o wtf is wrong with that guy.... even if im a pc i agree with applesoldier. guy doesnt know what hes talking about. lol cigarette. try djarum black before theyre gonna be illegal... cuz obama.
deejayWARP 2 years ago 2
I own both but primarily I am a PC guy too, and you are right. Applesoldier is not a stupid person, I may not agree with what he says but he is pretty smart and he is definately right here. You also got to give the guy credit for his tutorials, he is a major contributor (tutorial wise) and its nice of him to donate his time to help others out. Frankly, we need more people like him around here.
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
its funny cuz you guys get really into the commercials im a PC.... so your a personal computer well i have one.... a PC is a PC whether it be a mac or windows or ubunto.... hahahahaha
doh11 2 years ago
My Amiga is the best PC
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
"u stupid fucker, no offense" lol eric ur a beast
macintoshtipz 2 years ago 3
2:05 you stupid fucker, no offense.
TuFnGood4U 2 years ago
Not legally, and with complications. Apple would make naff all money selling OSX on it's own to install on any old hardware. They make their money on the hardware sales. Their current business model is VERY profitable. A study just came out that says they make 49% of every dollar spent on computers in the US. Quite impressive for a company who's OS share is only what, 5-10% (depending where you look). Those profit margins make their competition jizz their pants.
TalesOfWar 2 years ago
Software. OSX makes better use of the hardware than Windows does. You get more power for less hardware with a Mac. OSX is just superior at resource management. Think how Vista/7 need more power than XP to do the same tasks, same deal with OSX and Windows in general, they're just coded more efficiently (granted the time gap between releases comes into play with XP and Vista/7). An old G4 Mac can run Leopard (not Snow Leopard) perfectly fine, 2007 OS on 1999 hardware. Impressive optimisation.
TalesOfWar 2 years ago
I have a feeling it's because of the way the Architecture in a Xeon (which is still Intel) has been designed to run efficiently under heavy load which usually is almost always happening in servers as people would constantly be accessing them.
JStylezTS 2 years ago
you would have to ask a video professional who uses them on a daily basis. I haven't had the luxury to render and edit in HD on a Xeon 8 core/Quad core work station yet. However just from a quick test run at the Apple store for the 8 core Mac Pro running Final Cut, I re-rendered the Demo ad which is HD in the store and it crunched that thing in a matter of seconds. vs if it was my Dual core machine it would take me probably 5 minutes ish
JStylezTS 2 years ago
@ProwerPlays not to mention the last I checked a dual socket Xeon mobo can cost around about almost 500$.
and then you have the two Xeon Nehalems that your gonna have to pop on there.
that is DEFINITELY NOT going to be under 1000$
JStylezTS 2 years ago
I hope your iMac breaks and Apple will refuse to fix it due to damage from ciggarette smoke.
DigitalGamma 2 years ago
There is no PC that can kick the shit out of any Mac... Mac's don't have shit :)
xsonicbladex 2 years ago
more like 20 YEARS AGO
watchforfinger 2 years ago
LOL! Eric must drink a lot of coffee! Man, got to love these videos. 5 stars.
chessdude67 2 years ago
XEEEEEEOOOOOOOOOOOOOON lmfao
omgitspractice 2 years ago 3
I'm not getting wht people still think custombuilds are the same as a MacPro. It's NOT, If you want to compare the MacPro to something it should be compared to another WORKSTATION because THAT'S WHAT IS IS!!!
robbansv 2 years ago
And BTW, yeah I know adobePC was comparing his PC to a mac pro! But that is the whole reason why emeek is laughing at him for not comparing apples to apples. The EMEEK video was comparing PC to iMAC, NOT PC to MAC PRO. Can you understand? lol
If you want to compare the Mac pro to a custom built PC, I will agree that the mac pro is overpriced. But the 27 inch iMac cannot be beat for the price.
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
Yes finally we agree the 27inch Imac is Great value I did not mean to offend you i was just stating in relation to the video this is insulting that a custom built PC will own the crap out of a Mac Pro however yes I agree there exsists nothing that rivals the Imac 27inch not even close.
tommyratboy 2 years ago
Hmmmm i am sorry Applesoilder but you fail yet again
1.The Gt 220 is actually roughly on par with your HD3870
2.Please dont keep on going back to the Xeon argument they are not completely diffrent CPU's The i7 and Xeon are roughly on par,you can also buy a Xeon if you really want it's all about chioce.
3.tell me how much ram are you using in your mac pro I imagine nowhere near 32gb i imagine by the time 32gb is the standard your CPU will be a piece of shit.
tommyratboy 2 years ago
In the UK
6gb DDR3(Corsair) 1333mhz-£120
Asrock P55M Pro Socket 1156-£90.33
Intel Xeon X3450(2.66Ghz) Socket 1156-£185.15
Lian-Li PC60A Aluminium Silver Midi Tower Case-£75.19
950W Corsair TX950W High Performance Power Supply-£114.56
1GB MSI HD 5870-£310.44
1TB Western Digital WD1001FALS Caviar Black X 2-£70.94
Samsung DVD/R-£19
Total price
tommyratboy 2 years ago
£986.48
Base Mac Pro-£1,899.00
and £1000 left over for an IPS panel....
tommyratboy 2 years ago
That totals to more than the iMac, and you forgot;
1) Windows 7
2) Mouse
3) Keyboard
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
I am comparing it to a Mac Pro just like AdobePC did
Windows-£100
Mouse-£30(Apple Wired)
Keyboard-£30(Apple Wired)
Hmmm still alot cheaper....
tommyratboy 2 years ago
With everything total up, you spent 2146.80. which is more than 1899. How do you get cheaper?
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
Take into account without the imaginary IPS panel it is only £1146.48
tommyratboy 2 years ago
The Mac pro however does not come with a display.
tommyratboy 2 years ago
Yeah but to do a fair comparison, you need to factor in the display. So basically, your system cost more than the equivalent iMac. The difference is your video card and an extra 2 gigs of ram. You can get the iMac up to 8gigs of ram for 200 more, which is still less than your price.
PS: This video isnt about a mac pro.
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
I am sorry you must have not watched AdobePC's video (watch?v=oXHyxj7OHVo) the video is clearly a comparison with the Mac Pro,I actually like the Imac its great value but i personally dont like all in one's.
tommyratboy 2 years ago
So basically after I total up your price, including monitor, we have:
Total PC = 2292.09 + Shipping costs.
iMac, with 8 gigs of ram = 2099.00 (shipping is free)
So basically, using your example below, the mac is cheaper. Your video card is better, but thats the additional $200 cost for the PC.
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
Can you Read?
I am comparing it to the MAC PRO without the display, have you even seen the video this is a response to and if i really wanted i could put in a Radeon HD 4850 just like the Imac which is -£220 off the price but that is not the point I am comparing this to THE MAC PRO play this video in HD go fullscreen and read the name of the video FFS.
tommyratboy 2 years ago
Are you a moron? The video is about the iMac, not the mac pro. And BTW, I forgot, you need to add in a webcam, speakers and a microphone.
If you want to comment on the mac pro, do it in the other video you fucking idiot.
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
you should take a look at his ridiculous premiere pro-as-good-as-fina cut pro videos, and re-pwn him.
emperordarius 2 years ago
You're the MAAAAAN Eric. Keep owning the Windows Zombies!
empowermac 2 years ago
I have to give Eric props for this series, he is right and its funny how he owned the guy.
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
i love mac vs pc
planetpatrick 2 years ago 2
you should make an ownage video of video chatting with a guy like this and arguing with him back and forth and record it!
j0egas 2 years ago
he owned himself delux this time,,good job adobepc LMAO
macward66 2 years ago 2
What i think AdobePC is trying to do, is just talk about his system compared the iMac.
Yet it was the the wrong video to repond to adobe pc, because emeek wanst making a system he wanted. He was making a pc system that was comparable to the imac.
So yeah either way your fucking stupid for posting your irrelevant video to his.
Revollving 2 years ago
make the video comparison for a mac pro vs a custom built, would really wanna see how much it would cost...
AlTyler138 2 years ago
adobePC could've done better. Why did you choose such a cheap GPU. I don't understand what your video response was even about. Also why do people compare consumer PC's with Mac Pro's. Do you guys understand that the Mac Pro is a workstation. Just like Dell and HP's Business grade PC's, you don't compare a alienware to Dell workstation, it's not the same category.
krjcook 2 years ago
Again total agreement. Just for the sake of it I'd like to mention the more RAM slots you use the more bandwidth will be used on your motherboard and since he recommended a hit motherboard.
ljscott1990 2 years ago
true
AppleSoldier 2 years ago
aaaaah!!! i love your videos!
hanssmed 2 years ago
Or Applesoldier could stop being a prick. He totally butchered up my video dude. Watch my video.
adobePC 2 years ago
Comment removed
SunnyCool 2 years ago
Comment removed
SunnyCool 2 years ago
@AdobePC
Fuck your video, you got owned.
Revollving 2 years ago 2
applesoldier owned himself lol
omgitspractice 2 years ago
I agree. Everyone knows applesoldier hacked the crap out of my video. This is just pure BS from start to finish. Like Koasum3 stated it is not worth watching.
adobePC 2 years ago
I love the thinking in these vids that more cost = automatically means better performace and longevity. The xeon gibbering is also hilarious, its an i7 with the option to be paired with another i7, nothing more...
Performance wise choosing an i7 2.66 (£210) vs a xeon 2.66 (around £1000) is pointless as the perfomance difference (which is negligable) doesnt justify the massive price hike.
TheEire55 2 years ago
I agree.
adobePC 2 years ago
macs can't game if they are 5years old MAC FTW
b00nsmoviesss 2 years ago 2
adobePC is just a cock, don't worry about this guy hehehe.
he is just a joke seriously at least Zoul has useful facts with his arguments and is well worth arguing with but adobePC just owns himself which just makes him just a cock talking absolute shit.
pkerry12 2 years ago 2
how old are u?damnnnnn 11 years old
HiPh0plover 2 years ago
I saw AdobePC's video earlier today and I couldn't help but think he setup himself big time...
Wolfdale64 2 years ago
I set my self up? I stated I was building a system to compete wiht the Mac Pro not the iMac.
I am not comparing this system with an iMac. Get hat through your head folks.
adobePC 2 years ago
Did you see how he was purposefully cutting off your video at one point before you finished saying "Mac Pro". This whole video is just a setup to twist words from the beginning. Not worth watching the rest of the vids if hes doesnt know what exactly you are comparing your system to.
kaosum2 2 years ago
Owned again lol
noreallyphuckyou 2 years ago
Comment removed
hallbe 2 years ago
He thinks a 400 PC will kick the Shit out of a $2400 Mac pro how idiot is adobepc is
josecabes97 2 years ago 2
yea one word: OWNED
m4cbook 2 years ago
NO it will we game !!!! WOOOT
Airzonadrinks 2 years ago
I got one word for adobePC. OWNED! HE FAILS AT COMMUNICATION! He doesn't even fucking understand what your saying. SPEC for SPEC PRICE comparison! Not a what you want vs. what an iMac is. WTF IS THIS GUY ON? OMFG Eric. Holly shit, how much can one person fucking fail on communication? I've gone nuts before, but I don't fail on communication of a simple spec for spec comparison. OMFG, OWNED!
ViciousDave4Life 2 years ago 2
Get back on your meds guy.
kaosum2 2 years ago
This is hilarious. btw the gt220 sucks. The build he used to compare wouldn't even come close to kicking the iMac's ass.
xC4Rbonx 2 years ago
the GT120 sucks hard too
thebsdguy 2 years ago 2
He wasnt comparing that to a iMac, he was comparing to the MacPro.
kaosum2 2 years ago
You are right about that. He butchered the crap out of my video.
Ownage is comming as you can imagine. I will indeed be having some fun.
adobePC 2 years ago
Oh, like you purposefully butchered MY vids?
Way to be a hypocrite dude.
Also, a 4850, is like 5 times faster than the card you're getting dude. if you're going to talk shit, at least get a real card.
sc0pl355 2 years ago 3
I think it's quite obvious AdobePC, that you're comparison were inconsistent, were you comparing your GoodWill specials to a MacPro, or an iMac, c'mon which is it now? So far the only one who butchered your video was you.
Coraxuss 2 years ago
LMAO a 400-500$ PC is going to kick the shit out of a 2400$ machine .. what an idiot adobepc is
nabiawada 2 years ago 6
I think he lives in a special dream world where movies like Pirates of the Caribbean, Lord of the RIngs, transformers, etc etc etc all are rendered and edited and composited on cheap old sub 1000$ PCs.
JStylezTS 2 years ago
Hahahaaa hell i might pick me up one of those dream machines and produce something on the level of anyone one of those movies probably could do it in a few weeks with a system of that caliber !
nabiawada 2 years ago
I know right! I wonder what that dream machine might be? ;3
not a PC, not a Mac, not even a Server farm!
It's a . . . BONG!! :D
JStylezTS 2 years ago
They aren't rendered on Macs, thats for sure. Take Pixar for example, their render farm is *nix, not Mac. Hate to break this to you, but for the most part its all Windows and Unix (or Linux).
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
I know that. =_=;
I never said that Mac's render movies.
I was saying that adobePC thinks that movies of that caliber can be created on his cheap ass PC. You need thousands of servers if you want to get anything done for something of that magnitude.
JStylezTS 2 years ago
I'd LOVE to see his "PC" render something in 2k or 4k ProRES 4.4.4
I'd probably get a nice laugh out of that.
JStylezTS 2 years ago
Pixar has and uses macs, just not for the render farm. Pixar still also uses Avid and Maya 64 bit (on Windows). I remember the 1980's when Pixar also used Amiga's around the time of Luxo Jr (Amiga was the _BEST_ video PC out there).
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
lol of course Pixar uses macs, as well as Windows. In real life all companies (mainly large ones) all use both Macs and PC's. It's quite shocking for both side of the crowd to realize that.
But hey looks like your a pretty sensible guy so it's good to know there are people out their with their head on straight :D
JStylezTS 2 years ago
Well I own both PC's and Macs... Some of my PC's have Windows, others have Linux. At work I primarily use Windows, when I worked at Adobe I used both of course.
FrankRizzo6662 2 years ago
lol cool :D
I'm proud to say that I have an official copy of CS4 Design premium lol x]. not to mention I need it for my job so of course I need it.
JStylezTS 2 years ago
a 500$ Desktop Pc can have better specs than a Macbook Pro.
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
your an complete idiot ... comparing a desktop to a laptop ..
nabiawada 2 years ago
Comment removed
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
your still an idiot you know that right? because its a fact. its like comparing an orange to an apple ... lets compare an air plane ta a car next because you know they're both modes of travel .. wow
nabiawada 2 years ago
There are no boundaries in your dumb statement that a 500$ pc can not own a 2400$ mac. you never said whether it had to be a laptop to a laptop or a desktop to a desktop. Since your a piece of shit mac fag, you believe more money always equals faster machine. that is far from the truth, only a stupid mac fanboy lemming believes that. Windows is bundled with more features than Mac Osx, to get the apple equivalent features would be another 500$ attached to the price if you only buy apple.
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
I've used windows for almost 17 years and I use mac os x , I've had ever PC you can imagine but still changed to a mac so my opinion is alot more educated then yours resorting to calling someone a fag .. nice your cool thumbs up enjoy your 500$ dream machine :)
nabiawada 2 years ago
I own 2 macs, educated opinion my ass. I have used the Macintosh, performa, ibook, etc
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
nic ei love the internet i can say whatever I'm 23 years old but ive used a windows machine for 35 years I have 100 pc's 25 mac's and a super computer and i know what im talking about blah blah blah look seriously if you have an opinion state it move on no need to keep puking out your mouth if your bored and want to argue go find a 12 year old and enjoy your time but as for me i dont have the time for you, have fun with your 500$ dream machine :)
nabiawada 2 years ago
does Xserve support bootcamp?
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
it really does not matter, I corrected. a 500$ PC can have more performance than a 2400$ Macbook Pro.
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
good for you :) .. it still missing feature sets comes with crappy components and runs .. WINDOWS! yay i run both flawlessly so yup ... good for you go build that 500 dream machine and enjoy it fun time whooo yeahh awesome! fun anyways dont bother responding because this is a waste of time and i wont :)
nabiawada 2 years ago
any pc that runs windows as an primary system sucks by default
if you buy a mac you get quality not an hastly mass thrown togheter pc with the worst os ever
xleo21 2 years ago
Windows sucks because Why? its compatible, has the best software available for it, and has been rock solid for me with Windows 7. on a mac you have limited software, and hardware available and performance is worse than Windows applications. your mac is mass produced like any oem Pc. There are Oem's that produce higher quality machines than Apple, and most of the time a good custom build will beat a mac in terms of quality, price, and performance.
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
dude im talking about the platform not software avaible for it , by your logic linux sucks because it doesnt have good apps , but anyone who tried it knows it rapes windows in speed and memory
i suggest you watch applesoldier's video about hp envy , maybe you will get it : hp has alot of laptops with the same specs but this one is alot more expensive , but why? because of the quality and design it has been made with
kthxbie
xleo21 2 years ago
I can run apps that are ten years old on Windows 7, can you do that on your intel mac without third party software? Whats the point of an operating system if you have to use apps you don't want? Linux is better as a HPC server, but is it better than Windows at every single area compared to Windows? not really. Hp is overpriced like Apple, that is all there is to say. its not "Quality", it's just overpriced for higher profit margins because its not going to be a big hit seller..
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
what 10 year old app? if they were written for windows obviously it will , just like you cant run cocoa apps on your windows can you
what intel mac ? did i ever say i have a mac , because i sadly dont
in osx there arent many apps , but most of them are good apps not like the 1000000 windows app that do the exactly same thing , almost all windows apps have an equivalent in osx or linux
whats the point of hp overpricing something , you think that one laptop can be even compared to an plastic pc
xleo21 2 years ago
I am saying you can't run most of the applications from Os9 on a intel mac, compatibility is really bad.
I own two PPc macs, macs are overrated.
not all have a equivalent, and usually I can find a good freeware app for Windows. Hp can overprice because they can, just like how Apple overprices. Autocad for Windows, 3ds Max, Photoshop currently is better on Windows, Etc
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
WOW you cant run os9 apps on an new os x , how is that possible (sarcasm)
seriously powerPC thats about the equivalent of w95 why would you run such an old machine
maybe you should try the new intel macs and then say if its overated
lmao ppc that made my day
xleo21 2 years ago
I have used intel macs, the 2006 macbook pro model gives me headaches. just a bad laptop overall.
XXASCII808XX 2 years ago
i agree mac laptops suck but for the few months that i have used the quad core i7 imac it felt like a frikin dream
screw the macbook and its stupid backlit keyboard
imac ftw
xleo21 2 years ago