We Are Change Kicked Out Of TEA Party 4/15/2010

[AmaElMundo]

That fascist guy even LOOKED like what Nazis looked like

:{ jmg

[homiescopies]

ron paul has to answer the challenge made to him in Corporation Nation.

[ublock357]

ha ha you suck.

[maven21]

That is the Tea Party

[Georgerocker]

If I go, know that, that shit ain't going to fly. I will laugh in that piece of garbage face, then I will tell him to fuck off, and continue my way. Civil disobedience is a must!

[billyb3621]

Ok, listen up, dude. As a Truther for WAC, you didn't carry yourself very well, and you did NOT represent those of us who care about the issues. Your obnoxious signs made you look like hate-filled Nazi Skinhead punks with an axe to grind.

And all that name-calling...'this guy's a fascist', how immature was that?! - you certainly did all of us Truthers an injustice exhibiting that childish mentality.

No wonder these people wanted you the hell out of there! Alex Jones would be ashamed of you...

[TengoInfo]

I hope somebody calles a whambulance for this guy ^^

[devinmaru]

Thank you for putting up this vid and doing what you did.  I voted for Ron Paul but the tea party, Sarah Palin, and Glen Beck sully the constitution.

[robaquarian]

i thought libertarian and a paleo were different. thought buchanan was a paleo. paleos tend to be socially conservative. that's not libertarian. i agree though sarah palin should not be the head of the tea party. you have to be strategic, I'm a leftist and i campaigned for a libertarian republican against a neo con cause i agree with them on real issues. a libertarian could not win SF. so the pragmatic thing would be to support sheehan over pelosi. that transcending the right left paradigm.

[Libbzter]

fkn nazis

[WayAboveYou700]

we are change do no good, they just pretend.... scam artists thats all they are

[xymotic]

@WayAboveYou700　ｉ　ｓｅｅ　ｔｈｅ　ｐａｉｄ　ｔｒｏｌｌｓ　ａｒｅ　ｏｕｔ　ｉｎ　ｆｕｌｌ　ｆｏｒｃｅ　ｌｏｌ

[WayAboveYou700]

@xymotic what really usefull, apart from simple, emotional rants, has WAC done? Releasing anger, just like that clown, Alex Jones, who is on the payroll of the zionist controlled media...

[OmarThePug]

Look folks. From April 08 to April 10... the percent of registered Republicans in California dropped almost 4%! People see shit like this and RUN from the Repubican party.

[unsheepled]

EVENT STAFF did not decide...the ORGANIZERS are the ones that choked the llife out of liberty.

Thomas Jefferson and lil George Washington would have SPAT on these fakes TP dispensers

[yakyakyak69]

Watch these films on YouTube:

The American Form of Government (Our Founders FEARED Democracy)

The Story of Your Slavery (How we are Human Cows farmed for Milk and Labor)

The Philosophy of Liberty (What REALLY is Liberty?)

Under Progressives, we can NEVER be free!

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 obama is not a progressive. and the founding fathers were not that great. they really wanted an aristocracy. they talked about liberty but didn't really back it up. they were elitists read the federalist papers. if you are for 911 truth you should embrace progressives on your side and agree to disagree. they feared the tyranny of the masses. progressives were for 911 truth anti war civil liberties before as long as paleos have

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian ObaMao is a Progressive Communist. Carl Marx Karl Marx (1818–1883) wanted Change toward Socialism via Violent Revolution (Marxism). ObaMao is working to "Fundamentally Change" America into a Socialist "Utopia" via slow cancerous “progress” (aka Progressive aka Liberal) instead of violent revolution (Marxist Revolution).

The Soviets went to socialism via Marxism while Europe and later came the US under Wilson and FDR used the slow, cancerous progressivism Anti-Liberty FRAUD!

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 teh soviets were funded by wall street. stalin was state capitalism not marxism. your using words like Goebbels would. obama is a pawn of wall street and the military industrial complex. his health care is not socialized,obama is a fascist not a socialist. your system of the free market and no coercion is just as Utopian. will never work. tyranny is not due to capitalism or socialism its is do to the credulity of the masses.

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian The Soviets were funded by Wall Street?

Get back on your meds before you hurt yourself or someone else!

Yes, ObaMao is a crony-corporatist aka fascist and the health care bill forces millions of new "customers" into insurance and cap & Trade will make $Trillions to BP (natural gas), GE (electrification), Al Gore and G. Soros (trading schemes) and of course Unions. Socialisim can't work because power corrupts it into crony-corporatism. Only FREE Market Competition works!

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 yep look it up trotsky and lenin, your paleo conservative icon alex jones has even exposed that. obamas health care proves hes not socialist. a socialist health care would be single payer with a public option. obama lets the insurance companies have total control still.progressives do not like obama care. progressives do not like obama period. so if obama is a progressive then palin and the neo cons must be real conservatives right? i can play the same semantic game.

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian Again, Fascism and Socialism are BOTH forms of extreme statism!

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 socialism does not have to be extreme. i believe you can have free markets and some aspects of the economy socialized. you cant privatize the justice system schools health care etc profit and differential advantage is not conducive to those institutions. wheres the incentive for sustainability? you need balance. people are too stupid and apathetic for a real free market to work.

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian Do we need some gov't? Of course we need gov't to protect our natural rights and property and to keep civilization, well civil. We also need gov't to provide for the common defense against invasion. Gov't schools is a failure and so is central banking with fiat currency. Keynesianism (central planning) has also given us over $13Trillion in debt and $120Trillion in unfunded liabilities while crony-politicians pander.

Perhaps you should read: The Road to Serfdom. You will

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 some government is still a statist. and i'm familiar with all your arguments i've studied economics and political science for a long time so your not schooling me on anything. ultimately i am an anarcho syndicalist which is totally anti state and coercive institutions. but i realize there are steps to getting there i am pragmatic. 1st we need a revolution in consciousness get over this big daddy paradigm. and many paleo conservatives are Christians, was wondering if you were too.

[yakyakyak69]

“If some men are entitled by rights to products of the work of others, it means that those others being forced to provide are deprived of their rights and are condemned to slave labor. There can be no such thing as the right to enslave even for the welfare of others.”

Statist Progressives HATE liberty & promote Big Govt SLAVERY. In the US, the 50% who pay taxes are SLAVES to the 50% who don't & all are Slaves to the crony political class & their Oligarchy owners. Defend 10th Amenedment!

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 its not 50%. and many of those people that don't pay taxes are elderly and children. who will and did pay taxes. the rich don't pay shit. we give billions in corporate welfare and subsidies. most taxes go to the military and the fed. most people of wealth don't create shit. most people get wealth through inheritance. labor is what creates most of our resources.if your gonna be wearechange then be about those issues. be a capitalist in your own time. your dividing a good cause.

[yakyakyak69]

Throw OUT the Statist Progressive NeoCons & Democrats!

STOP Empire Building & Foreign Intervention with 700+ US military bases OCCUPYING over 135 nations PRODUCING hatred & jihad RESISTANCE!

Trade, NOT bribes/bombs Manipulation OR Isolationism!

STOP Fascist Crony Corporatism, Illegal Immigration & Marxist Redistributionist TREASON.

Return to Constitutionally limited Gov't, Individual Liberty & Responsibility, Sound Money, FREE competition between FREE States & FREE people.

[WayAboveYou700]

@yakyakyak69 the official number of American military bases is over 1000

[yakyakyak69]

@WayAboveYou700 Yep, Empire is EXPENSIVE and maintaining one combined with social redistribution and resulting corruption has bankrupted EVERY nation that has tried it including Egypt, Greece, Rome, Spain, British, Soviets and now the United States.

Welcome to the New Global Governance or, by and FOR the Corporate Elite and their crony political class supported by social-fascist greedy unions.

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 do not use the word progressive with neo con. progressives like kucinich and nader are fighting fascism,just cause u disagree on entitlements that should be secondary. the main issues are constitution,war,911. we need a united from progressives and libertarians. why are you being divisive? and fascism was created to fight socialism and leftist movement in europe. so dont call them the same. corporate democrat=obama ,progressive=nader, neo con republican= palin libertarian=paul

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian

Progressive = Big Gov't Statist (see Liberal aka ANTI-LIBERTY aka Democrat)

Statists include Socialists, Marxists, Fascists (national socialists), & "New" Conservatives.

Social Justice (socialism) is the opposite of Equal Justice because Social Justice is not blind and intentionally places people into special interest groups so one group can be forced to "give" to another. Social Justice is slavery because those FORCED by gov't to give become slaves of the receiving group.

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 national socialism was not socialism thats double speak. so if your a progressive you cant be for liberty? marxism ends with the withering away of the state if youve ever read marx. fascism uses leftist slogan and populist appeak to get in to power but its nothing close. in socialism production is controlled by the workers themselves.

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian Socialism is SUPPOSED to be controlled by the workers, life is SUPPOSED to be fair. People are SUPPOSED to be honest. Greed, jelosy, fear, hate, lust, envy and so on are not SUPPOSED to exist.!

The FACT is that power corrupts and ALWAYS concentrates, (just ask the Soviets). The ONLY way to keep people FREE and the production largely controlled by the workers is with FREE competition instead of crony politicians picking winners and losers with Big Gov't FORCE!.

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 google reformed-theology  bolshevik revolution

wall street and russian revolution

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 ...you over simplify these ideologies and put them out of context my point is you should agree to disagree with leftists that agree with you on the most crucial issues thats how you change things.do you wanna have a right 911 truth and a separate left 911 truth? thats how they divide and conquer. civil rights,anti war movement most social progress last 50 years all by leftists.

and you are a statist too unless your an anarchist. dont use the term so loosely.

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian Babble much?

Look up the film: The American Form of Government.

This will help fix all those years of Progressive State School Programming and show you the difference between individual liberty and collectivist state controlled fantacy.

Men are NOT insects with a hive mind. We are not Borg, but even the Borg had a strong, corrupt leader with a powerful cadre of mindless drones... like you.

[robaquarian]

@yakyakyak69 i am not indoctrinated i come to my own conclusions, and Capitalism is SUPPOSED to be about free markets and freedom and the individual but is it in america or anywhere else? i can use the same slippery slope argument. capitalism leads to concentration of power too.private concentration of wealth can be just as tyrannical. the so called free market has always been rigged. there has never been a pure capitalist system any where or a socialist system. so your argument is not valid.

[yakyakyak69]

@robaquarian If Congress honored their oath and defended the Constitution INCLUDING the 9th and 10th Amendments which limited the scope and power of the ambigous Commerce and General Welfare clauses, then cronism could NOT happen... PERIOD!

It's a LOT easier for Congress to break up monopolies so FREE competition can economically evolve mankind than it is for a few crony politicians to control every aspect of every business and every person in the country to benefit a few special interests.

[teo829]

"Fascist...no better than the Nazis" in your face Mr. Sheriff

[UcantKillBluffy]

It's funny listening to these guys running the camera. They really have no idea what they are talking about. Their free speech rights were never taken away, as evidenced by their endless mind numbing rambling as they were walking.

[UcantKillBluffy]

These events, wether tea party or not, are private (permit required) events. As such, even though they are held in public areas, for the time they are being held, the event and the land they are on are treated and private (both property and event) and are subject to control by the host of the event. The host of the event is responsible for ensuring the safety and security of the event and its attendees.

[UcantKillBluffy]

Part of providing for this security involves removing people that are against the event, or may be possible aggitators, and cause a disturbance that will disrupt the event and put peoples safety and security at risk.

[UcantKillBluffy]

But, lets not bog these kids down with things as burdensum as facts, or ask them to think for themselves...I mean lord knows, the following is a much more reasonable explination for why they were removed from the event...EVERYONE IS A FASCIST!!! FASCIST!!! FASCIST!!! YOU'RE LIKE HITLER!!! YOU FASCIST!!!!

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

So you are saying we all need a permit to go see the PEOPLE SPEAK about what they would do with America? Hmmm so now we have to pay to hear the views of the people we are supposed to vote for? Umm I tell you right now that is not how America was created.....

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

So the host of the event is also responsible for taking away someone else rights A feat which CONGRESS can not even do wow that is a lot of power vested in the host of this event...

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

Do you know the 1st Amendment? You can not tell someone they can not speak their mind anywhere in America... They is no free speech zones. America is the free speech zone. Not where they designate it to be it is natural rights to be able to speak your mind ANYWHERE in America.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger I do understand the 1st amendment, and I also, understand Private Property laws in this country. When you have an event, such as this one, that requires a permit, area listed in that permit (even if it is a public area like a park) is considered to be private property for the duration of the event, and the permit holder has the right to decide who gets to be there and why.

[UcantKillBluffy]

You do have a right to speak your mind, however, the people running the event have the right to tell you where you can or can't do it from, in the event area.

Just to simplify it for you, You have the right to say what ever you want in this country, but you don't have the right to say it from MY front porch. That's how the 1st amendment and private property laws work in this country.

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

"The First Amendment (Amendment I) to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights. The amendment prohibits the making of any law "respecting an establishment of religion", impeding the free exercise of religion, infringing on the freedom of speech, infringing on the freedom of the press, interfering with the right to peaceably assemble or prohibiting the petitioning for a governmental redress of grievances."

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

So telling someone they have to go somewhere else to speak is infringing on the freedom of speech. Kicking them out of there for no reason is interfering with the right to peaceably assemble.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger this argument would only be valid if this was a government sponsored event. This was an event put on by private citizens, and as I explained above, for the duration of the event, that area was considered private, not public.

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

I repeat to you the Constitution and Bill of Rights are documents that the congress themselves without 2/3 agreeing can change. As far as I know the 2nd Amendment has never been ratified... It states in the 2 Amendment that Congress shall make NO law abridging the FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger maybe you might want to try reading up on PRIVATE PROPERTY laws. On your property, or property you have legal control over, you have more rights then law enforcement, or even the United States Congress to say what goes on on that property. You have the right to express yourself, I have the right to disagree, and you have the right to have me removed from your property, simply because you disagree with me (you have a right to not have me there under the law).

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

On someones property yes but that is public property not private property.... Owned by the state and Federal Government and therefore a free speech zone to every American Citizen. Do you not understand that concept? It is written into the Constitution that you have FREE SPEECH and the GOVERNMENT can not take it away.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger OK you are obviously not getting it...When you pay for an event permit, the area (i.e. building, park, beachfront) wether it is publicly owned or not, is considered, for the duration of the event, to be PRIVATE PROPERTY and there for is subject to PRIVATE PROPERTY laws, not PUBLIC...It's like renting the land, building, theater, etc...for the time you are renting it, it is private property.

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

I do not care if you pay for shit... Do you realize that the congress can not make a law abridging the freedom of speech... So that itself means you can not create a law to sell the property and allow them to take free speech as well. That is making a law to abridge the freedom of speech...

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger are you telling me, that I do not have a right, under the constitution, to tell you to leave my property (to get out of my house or off of my land), if I don't like what you are saying?

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

I am telling you they do not have the right under the Bill of Rights to create ANY LAW THAT ABRIDGES THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH... This means you can not create a law to rent out public property and allow the peoples renting to ABRIDGE THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH. Is it that hard to understand?

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger WOW, it's like arguing with a wall. IF YOU RENT (ISSUE A PERMIT) THE PROPERTY OUT, IT IS NO LONGER PUBLIC PROPERTY, FOR THE DURATION OF TIME THAT IT IS BEING RENTED (USED). This is not done to infringe on peoples right to free speech or right to assemble, but to protect the rentors right to PRIVACY, which anyone paying to use anyproperty would expect (if they are renting it from the Gov). and with tht we circle back to PRIVATE PROPERTY laws.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@UcantKillBluffy *(even if they*

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

Do you not listen to what I just stated... That is creating a law allowing someone to to take the freedom of speech away... So there for it is illegal and breaking the 1st Amendment...

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

Hence it is public property... It does not belong to you. Do you hold the deed to that property? No it is PUBLIC PROPERTY. You can not create a law that allows any person to take away the freedom of speech.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger do you hold the deed to a hotel room when you rent it? Do you hold the deed to a public office building, when you rent office space? No, and yet you still have the right under the law (even in government owned buildings), to remove people from your hotel or office, simply because you don't like what they say. It's your right as the rentor.

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

No I do not hold the deed of the hotel room. But the hotel holds the deed that is a disclaimer between you and the hotel. The government is not the hotel owner it is as a whole and there for must uphold the laws. The law states freedom of speech and making no law to abridge that law.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger ok, but according to your logic, if you rented office space in a government owned building, I should be able to walk right in to the middle of your office and stand there for as long as I want, saying what ever comes to mind (no matter how obscure or vulger), and you shouldn't be able to do or say anything about it, right?

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

How often do you see government buildings where you can rent them??? You are seriously stupid it is a public event on public property dealing non other then with politics and you do not allow freedom of speech is illegal. You are threatening opposition... That is wrong in all aspects and against Americans natural rights. It is illegal....

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger I see government owned buildings rented out all the time, just because you don't see it dosen't it doesn't happen. You seriously need to educate yourself, your biggest threat, right now, is your own ignorance, and your unwillingness to accept that you don't know everything. I have dealt with private property laws as well as constitutional laws, and the enforcement of both, for 12 years.

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

Yea sure you have... Now you are a lawyer. And you do not even know that it is illegal for them to make ANY LAW ABRIDGING FREEDOM OF SPEECH. So much for your understanding of English....

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

It was a public event... PUBLIC not PRIVATE... Is it called the TEA PARTY PRIVATE EVENT NOW????

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger They have alway been private events. Private events that the public are allowed access to. The only way for them to truely be Public events would be if they were put on by Government bodies.

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

Get serous man!!! You know I am 100% right. Why argue most people would have stopped when I stated that congress can't even make a law abridging free speech. Let alone the the people who rented the property from the government. Which is public property and a public event for the PUBLIC to come to.

[UcantKillBluffy]

@ctrackmonger removing me from your property or the property you have control over, does not infriinge on my free speech rights, because I can still speak freely elsewhere.

[ctrackmonger]

@UcantKillBluffy

Difference is they are not on private property.. They are in public meaning there is no right to say you can not do it on my porch as you put it. It is PUBLIC is there something you do not understand about that??? He was holding a sign expressing himself. As far as i saw he was not ranting. He asked a question and got a bunk answer... REMEMBER THIS IS A PUBLIC EVENT NOT A HOUSE PARTY...

[geojoey15]

Dude, I really like the part with the subtitles. Great timing.

[alinsatx]

well what do you expect its California !! what a f*** up state. thats what you get in Pelosi,Boxer,Waxman world..fantasy land. wait and see, the clones there will re elect pelosi and the rest of the rats !!!

[pdalko]

Another crazy nitwit gets kick out.  LOL!!!!

[WonModeerf]

Tea parties are fake and gay!

[bethsbabies]

As a "tea partier," I am outraged by this video. This man, from what I can tell, was not causing a scene or disrupting anyone and he has as much right to be on the grounds of the tea party as anyone else. How DARE this jerk act like he owns the land and rules as the "speech police!" This is appalling and the guy on the video is RIGHT -- he is no better than Obama & his czars. SHAME!

[dmcindc]

@bethsbabies So what you're saying is that if an African American Organization were to get the necessary permits for a rally or protest, that KKK members should totally be allowed to walk freely into and through such rally?

[itseyona]

Free speech zone? ZONE?!? Forget these NeoCons. Left,..Right,..both sides are jacked. Vote in the Paul's and those like them!

[dmcindc]

Wow this guy is truly pathetic. He acts like his free speech is being taken away, but he is too stupid to realize that nobody took it away. He does indeed have free speech, but not at an event where he has no permit to counter-protest. Yes, they can kick him out of their rally. The idiot can go whine "fascist" all he wants outside of their rally and continue to show what a fool he is.

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc you don't need a permit for to speak freely ... shut you neoCON lib you are not better than libtards with comments like that ... NO DIFFERENCE!!!

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution The fact of the matter is, permits are necessary to protect freedom of speech for the groups of people who get the permits, and overall safety at such areas. Nobody took away any freedom of speech from the counter-protesters and they simply had to assert their free speech outside of this groups' permit area where they were asserting theirs.

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc no permits ARE NOT necessary that is what you have been brainwashed to believe ... there is NO law that requires a FREE SPEECH permit or zone! you have a dilapidated view of FREE SPEECH where you are OK being fascist and segregated ... the Tea Party has been hijacked by the establishment neoCONS and are nothing more than fake repub pep rallys' ... makes me sick

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution Most cities do indeed require a permit to protest in an effort to help avoid traffic/crowd problems, to ensure safety in the area/community, and to prevent interference with the rights of others.

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc no permits ARE NOT necessary and there is no law that requires to do so .. it is UN constitutional. you sound like a typical neocon that love to spout off on safety and give up your rights or you THINK that you have some sort of right to tell others what they can or cannot say! go read some of the founders quotes ... that is just ridiculous

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution Government run health care and wealth redistribution is unconsititutional too, and what the Tea Party stands up against, so where's your stand on that?  I'm not at all a neocon, nor an anarchist, but rather a Libertarian who believes in limited government. Your rights end where mine begin. No, you don't get to crash permit protests and take away another groups' freedom of speech and stomp on their rights.

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc yes i am against this boon doggle as well ... but the neoCONS plan for health care are not much different its not REAL REFORM.

Oh good a Libertarian I am as well which is why I am very adament in re. to limiting anyones free speech in any manner ... plus those people had every right to hold up their signs in the event just as much as tea party people can hold up signs at barry soetoro lib events.

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution Just curious... What are your thoughts on the most recent Supreme Court decision that campaign-finance limits were a violation of free speech?

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc we haven't had a real supreme court in over 100 yrs ... that what i think

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution "The existence of free speech zones is based on U.S. court decisions stipulating that the government may regulate the time, place, and manner—but not content—of expression." I know you are probably very much against this, but it is in fact what happened in this case. The Tea Party had a permit for the area, and the counter-protester were directed to the "Free Speech Zone", which is usually on the border of such area.

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc oh i see because 'the govt' said so! if you are a true Libertarian than you should be eating those words and standing against it ... there is no law requiring permits that is sham and just something the sheeple have been lead to believe ... its bs control measures ... period

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution True Libertarians are not anarchists. They believe in reasonable, balanced, limited government control. In my opinion permits for protests are necessary to protect the rights and freedoms of those protesting and those who choose not to, and it's not all about the counter-protesters. True Libertarians would understand that it's not only about their rights, but the rights of everyone else as well.

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc you just said it yourself those people have the same rights as and anyone that told them differently encroached on their rights. NO free speech does not need a permit ... those guys were REAL tea party members

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution Reasonable restrictions on the right to free speech and assembly are made all of the time.  I would highly suggest you look at case law involving such to understand it better.

[geojoey15]

@dmcindc I agree with the first part of your comment but case law is not the highest law of the land. Invoking case law is in large part why we're having so many problems with the courts.

[dmcindc]

@geojoey15 My point is, there are indeed laws, and reasons behind such laws, involving freedom of speech in order to protect everyone's rights.... ie. expressing freedom of speech by shouting out others is taking away their rights to it., and you can't express your freedom of speech at the cost of my safety.

[dmcindc]

@geojoey15 The White Supremacy rally in CA is a perfect example of why permits are necessary. There were violently attacks by counter-protesters and five arrests were made as a result. What would have happened had police not been there and the laws enforced to protect people's rights (Yeah, even White Supremacists have rights too)?

[geojoey15]

@dmcindc it's a complicated issue, for sure. Fight the good fight, bro!

[Livefreerevolution]

@dmcindc they are not reasonable and if you are a Libertarian you should know better than to play games with free speech ... its not how it works

[dmcindc]

@Livefreerevolution "... those guys were REAL tea party members" Yes, but they appeared to be counter-protesters, and counter-protesters are usually escorted by security out of permit areas to the outer free speech areas. This appears to be what happened in this case. It happened in DC as well, though not just over a sign, but also for obnoxious behavior against Tea Party people. BTW, I am no fan of Sarah Palin, but I don't think she is satan either.

[FreeLovingAmerican]

@dmcindc Why do you need a permit to exercise free speech? How is that free speech?

[dmcindc]

@FLA - You have free speech in this country, but that doesn't mean you can shout "Fire!" in a crowded theater now does it?

[dmcindc]

@FLA - Those who organized the Tea Party rally got the necessary permit for their protest. Your only reason for being there was to cause disruption and trouble at their rally, and they can make you leave their protest area for that as it's a matter of safety. If you want to express your freedom of speech in particular venues, you can also get a permit & have your own rally, & if any Tea Party people came to crash your protest, you could make them leave your protest area too.

[MyLifeRules76]

this video is pathetic.

[bestwrmd]

thanks man. now we know how corrupt the tea partie movement actually are.

[dvalentino007]

Explans how corrupt the tea party movement actually are and how they are no voice for real americans and only cater for media brainwahed zombies open to the manipulation of fake Patriots like disnfo king Beck. When will these nazi filth realise thst authority is not truth and they are only acting to destroy theitr own rights through government uses of demonising and fake bogeymen.

[mountain19]

this is how we fail. who the hell is this man who threw them out? who does he really work for? infiltrated groups. it is this man's tern to be a gov. ass. this is where and how we fail.... fools...

[climbarok]

Free Speech Zones are an oxymoron under our Constitution. This is the destruction of the 1st Amendment.

[greatbroad]

See, here's what has happened: Tea Party Express is being funded by RNC

[xylemphoenix]

McCain refused to let Ron Paul speak at the Republican National Convention in 2008, so it's not shocker that Palin's people would act in the same way. Good sign BTW!!