this is not a derivation of Shrodinger Eq... you took a time-dep wave equation/soln [ of form e raised to power i(k*r - wt) ] and showed that it fits the differential eq alright. So with the connections in QM, ie E=h(bar)*w and p=h(bar)*k, you can further arrive at the time-dependent Shrodinger Eq.
this is not a derivation of Shrodinger Eq... you took a time-dep wave equation/soln [ of form e raised to power i(k*r - wt) ] and showed that it fits the differential eq alright. So with the connections in QM, ie E=h(bar)*w and p=h(bar)*k, you can further arrive at the time-dependent Shrodinger Eq.
cesarjom 11 months ago
first learn to leave off the space-time variables in wave function: (x,y,z,t). Just using the function symbol psi is sufficient!
cesarjom 11 months ago
congratulations, good work... thank you...
UgurCdi 1 year ago
Comment removed
Xkcdification 1 year ago
Le agradezco por mostrar este tema.
Yo considero que hay una inconsistencia en la ecuación de energia.
Cualquier cosa me avisan.
La energia total para el problema en cuestion es la es la suma de todas las radiaciones de todas la longitudes de onda insidentes en el sistema.
Al hacer la derivada en ese paso, considero que no es consistente.
Voy a investigar mañana, para comprobar
E=nhf.
Trombolocho 2 years ago
Excellent presentation! nice flow! thank
pipobwana1 3 years ago
sooo realevant to the average persons day to day life
deathtoamerica3 3 years ago
In the future it will be.
Pudersepp 2 years ago
it's relevant to me - I need to know this for my theoretical chemistry module.
otleybey 2 years ago 2
You could not have posted your stupid comment without it.
DrBPhD 2 years ago