Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)
- Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
or sign in to load a different list.
Loading...Saving...
Loading...Saving...
This has been flagged as spam show
Mit was 18 years old in 1965. Why didn't he serve: 3 deferments to France as a missionary. Romney has 5 military age sons and not one decided to serve his country. Doesn't seem like a very patriotic family to me. It would be a disgrace if he became our president. How could he ask others to serve when none of his own would???
jflynn7894 1 month ago in playlist Mitt Romney
That's intelligently said. I'm sure it won't be hard to convince all of your family to vote against him. I'm sure you are all as informed and as cute as you too.
santeleon 1 year ago
@OrmondRender
America: providing the prerogative for bigots to express their opinions daily!
Do you really want to open that can of comparisons?
Mitt Romney is raising money for conservatism across the United States and publishing serious policy ideas... Huckabee is playing bass on a cable television program and interviewing stars about their digestive illnesses.
blandinthebasement 1 year ago
All you Romney supporters are so gullible. Yea keep voting for the republican/democrat establishment i'm sure it will be really different from bush/Obama era
djtohkee 1 year ago
@djtohkee
I'm not supporting Romney because he's a republican...I'm supporting romney because he's intelligent, well-educated--and ACCOMPLISHED!!!
You libertarians always have a shtick....it's always about ideals and how other people suck at reaching those ideals---but you never have any policy ideas to throw out there.
blandinthebasement 1 year ago
@djtohkee
You libertarians are so gullible---fighting the two party system is the most ridiculous and ineffective way to enact conservative policies. Third parties only break up the efficacy of coalitions. What we need is to pay more attention to the candidates, whatever party, we are putting into office. We need representatives in BOTH parties that respect the constitution, who have a stable background of solving problems. Your rejection of Mitt Romney on ideological grounds is foolishness
blandinthebasement 1 year ago
Romney has an excellent shot in 2012 .
Sadly last time Obama was unstoppable .
He was a great conman and got elected on his promises of change . Nobody would listen that is was all an act . Now he's exposed and Romeny can beat him .
Romney 2012 !
sj1778 2 years ago 8
Mitt is the MAN!!!!! Romney '12!!!! If America is truly desiring to shoot itself in the foot (AGAIN!)...it will decide otherwise.
platinumcar 2 years ago 7
Mitt is the only qualified, viable candidate (if he so decides) in 2012. MITT FOR PRES '12!!!!!!!
frzbeachsk8 2 years ago 5
Romney knows his stuff. He's the guy for 2012.
phillip84109 2 years ago 13
Amen to that...!
frzbeachsk8 2 years ago 4
vote Mitt 2012 but Palin? crazy not know.
OrmondRender 2 years ago 2
He is Republican-Mormonism!
Huckabee is Repubican-Baptist!
OrmondRender 2 years ago
@OrmondRender What's your point? i Don't think either religion is relevant.
ksaf84 2 years ago 3
Your point?
frzbeachsk8 2 years ago 2
Mitt just makes sense.
cureloms 2 years ago 5
HEY MITT.
Who do you think was printing all that money and running up all that credit? It was the FEDERAL RESERVE. They are the ones who are creating money out of thin air. They are a private corporation that is protected from any oversight by anyone and is protected from audit.
ClickParker 2 years ago
Hell Yeah Mitt.
Please Run in 2012. You would smoke Obama and that grinning Fool Biden.
sauron9990 2 years ago 7
He always lets Huckabee off the hook and then Huckabee turns around and hammers him every chance he gets! Mitt need to stop being so nice to that jerk. I will be majorly pissed if Mike Huckabee is the Republican nominee in 2012.
speagles22 2 years ago 2
No way, Mitt is way more intelligent..Mitt 2012
speakerman1818 2 years ago 2
Good one Mitt.
red5llaw 2 years ago 2