Ignorance is bliss, thanks to my visionary quest for knowledge I don't agree with [thebadassoromo] & the Somalian guy that you had this debate with, eventhough I'm Somali my self. The real children of Kush are not limited only in the horn, but many parts of the mainland of Africa including the southern Sudan, this joyous & beautiful pple remind me of my friends in Kenya the 'Jalwa' tribe and the Dinka tribe of S-Sudan. I don't know Y brothers believe the Whites when they murdered & slaved Africa
Why is there an argument about these African people. If it walks like a duck quaks like a duck and swims like a duck then it must be a duck no matter where in the world it is. People need to stop the nonsence that Africans did not travel by sea and migrate to other parts of the world.They did it in ancient times that's why we have all these deffrent races on the planet. To pretend that Africans never traveled is as silly as telling children about Sant Nick and gifts for good kids in the world.
I pray there is are still 300 of these beautiful brothers and sister left. Beware when others come riding in on their boats coming as friends...we know that story to well...they will bringt their diseases, homosexuality, hate and everything else that destroys people. They are BEAUTIFUL
I feel sadness seeing this, purely for the reason that you know Europeans will invade them at some point. Please God don't make the devil destroy theses people too!
@abshirsen if thats true what you say then cushites extent all the way into west africa ,rwanda,congo and beyond because many people fit that description as afroasiatic and even some african americans and afro carribeans as well.The true seat of the ckush empire of in nubia which is Sudan
@bignasxl Yep! And who really created that idea that "Cushite" is only the category of the people with "long muscles, thin tall, thin hair, fine and long pointed noses" anyway?
The early descriptions of Cushite people around the world sure don't—neither do the ancient depictions either.
The ancient descriptions and depictions of cushites show a RANGE.
Westerners made up that idea that Cush only refers to a few ethiopian/somali tribes.
@abshirsen Actually, the REAL cushites are all those who descend from the ancestor KUSH and his descendants—which include MANY brown peoples across the earth—that is if you know the histories and traditional genealogies of brown peoples of the earth.
LMAO at the real kushites are all those who descend from ancestors kush and his descendant-which include many brown people across the earth -that is if you know the histories and traditional genealogies of the brown people of the earth" LOOK here stop relating yourself and other people to my Hamitic/kushitic people. I am Oromo and only the people who are related to my Oromo people can be called kushites.
@THEBADASSOROMO (HUGE SIGH!!!) Hon, I JUST had this conversation with a somalian yesterday, & he after going through our genealogies in the african interior—he was left speechless without the ability to prove wrong the fact that the rest of africans are also cushite descent. Please just stop, I'm tired of repeating myself.
The problem with people like you is that you think you guys in the horn of africa are the only Africans that have genealogies that trace back to Kush. I pity your ignorance.
look you afrocentric turd, only the Oromo and the people who are related to the Oromo can be called kushites.
I suggest you stop talking out of you're arse and provide me with scientific proof such as genetic and anthropology that proof these people are related to my kushitic people.
@THEBADASSOROMO Hon, the only way to find out what genes were spawned through kush is by studying the traditional genealogies. Genetic by itself doesn't necessarily reveal WHO SPAWNED THEM since people over time can intermarry with each other—you have to analyze genealogies along with it in order to determine that to find out what peoples crossed and mingled over time to determine genetic origins, as well as test genes of bones. That hasn't been done extensively in Africa.
don't hun me, you Afro-turd. you yet to provide me with any sort of scientific evidence such as anthropology, genetic and linguistic that pack up your desperate claims to relate yourself and other people to my kushitic people.
OMG you're changing the subject, because you don't have any scientific evidence to pack up you're bullshit claims that you and these people in your videos are kushites. since I am the one who asked you to provide me with scientific proof such as linguistic, anthropology and genetic. you got owned.
@THEBADASSOROMO Stop being so over dramatic and just answer the question. The subject is the same, you asked me for scientific evidence to show that inland africans are Kushite descent.
Since you were the first to try to dispute my statement that inland africans are also Kushite descent, I asked you what your basis is for that belief. I'm also asking for evidence—based on facts— to back up your claim that we are not, if you can that is.
@THEBADASSOROMO You can only prove what genes or language is Kushite or not if you have a base starting point to compare modern genes and linguistics of africans too. The questions is—DOES THAT EXIST?
Just as you can trace french, spanish, etc to Latin, why? Because we have the language of early latin. So my question to you is, What was the early Kushite language and Gene haplogroups to compare modern linguistics and haplotypes of africans too? Tell me.
stop changing the subject, and i have time to waste on someone like you who can't provide a scientific proof to pack up their claim.
i asked you several times to provide me with genetic, linguistic and anthropology proof that those people in you're video are kushites. yet you couldn't.
@THEBADASSOROMO First off, sweetie, this is MY channel & MY video, so I CALL THE SHOTS.
I never said I couldn't any evidence that the rest of Africans are descendant from Kush & Ham.
But since YOU were the first to try to dispute that FACT. It should be YOU who gives evidence to support your claim that we are not.
Sounds like you're just dodging the subject cuz you don't have any solid evidence, just a blind belief. I asked you FIRST, before you asked me, what the basis for your belief was.
@THEBADASSOROMO So go ahead ... If you really have any solid evidence, it shouldn't be so hard to relay it. I've already relayed the evidence to support the fact that we are Hamitic/Kushite on numerous other videos, hon. So it's your turn.
So the question is, IS THERE ANY SUBSTANTIAL, SOLID, THOROUGHLY RESEARCHED & RELIABLE evidence linguistically & genetically to support your claim that we are NOT descendant from Ham and Kush?
@THEBADASSOROMO I already provided a simple answer to your question about LINGUISTICS. Answer these questions correctly: Did the early Kushites originally speak any language mixed with or related to semetic languages, like "Afro-Asiatic" is?
How many ancient Kushite Scripts have been found documenting the ORIGINAL language of the Early, Original Kushites (unmixed)?
What was their content, were any of the Scripts of "Afro-Asiatic" stock?
As far as genetics, what is/are the Kushite Gene(s)?
And what is the basis of your answer?
Is the notion that only certain Horn Africans are Kushite/Hamitic even based on Genetics or Linguistics, or rather—is it based on accounts of genealogies taken by foreigners like the arabs & europeans of only a few tribes in the Horn Africa which caused them to only label a few horn africans as Kushite & assume their
genes & language must be the so called "Kushite" genes/languages?
@THEBADASSOROMO I've studied this aspect of science for over a decade & know that re: african studies, most scientists ADMIT they haven't even done THOROUGH excavations or research of any Africans on any level to provide any solid conclusions about our origins. Simply put—IT'S NEGLECTED.
So go ahead and answer ALL the questions CORRECTLY.
I'm being fair about this, if you can provide any evidence, I'll take a look at it.
@THEBADASSOROMO LOL! Ya know, it is very sad that you couldn't even provide the very same evidence you asked me for to back & prove your claims. LOL!
I already knew you wouldn't be able to, because there isn't any solid evidence scientifically to prove that only a few horn africans are the only Kushite since the industry admits no real extensive excavations or research have been carried on the topic.
@THEBADASSOROMO As far as language, don't even attempt to say their original language was "Afro-asiatic," (a recent western-created classification) cuz it's a known historical fact that early Hamitic peoples used interpreters to speak to Shemetic speakers. This means if your language is derived from Afro-asiatic—they didn't speak what you speak. LOL!
So, no, up until this point nobody's gotten "owned" nothing. LOL!
Now, for Genes. Your answer to the question, please ...
@THEBADASSOROMO I have no idea where these few horn african tribes got the CRAZY idea that they are the only Cushites. LOL! Kush had way over 30 LARGE groups of people descend from him—and these few (not all) ignorant horn africans think all these HUGE families are only preserved in just a few tribes in the horn of africa?
That is so illogical. LOL! A person has to be really either dumb, ignorant, and/or brainwashed to think that. LOL!
I wonder if horn africans get this idea from whites.
Hamites and Cushites? They were black? So, doesn't that mean that the original Egyptians were black? Ham was the progenitor of western and southwestern areas including Egypt and Ethiopia. (not a troll).
Reminds me of scenes in Avatar the great moral based movie that while reaping in more profits didn't when the highest award. It touched slimy and devilsh nerves.
They are white "caucasoids" who simply just have dark brown skin, tight kinky hair, lush full lips and flat noses who speak a language and have a dna strain related and derived from the same stock as Africans.
@thotsins I DON'T KNOW WHO ARE WHAT YOU ARE BUT PLEASE DON'T CALL THESE PEOPLE CAUCASOIDS THESE CHILDREN OF THE SUN ARE VERY BEAUTIFUL BROTHERS AND SISTERS ARE DOWNRIGHT GORGEOUS IN MY EYE SIGHT!! WHITE CAUCAZOIDS ALBINOIDS ARE PALE FACE HAIRY NASTY LOOKING CAVE BEASTS TO ME WHITE ALBINOIDS ARE UNNATURAL LOOKING CREATURES THAT ARE HARD ON THE EYES!! I FEAR FOR THESE PEOPLE WHEN THEY COME IN CONTACT WITH PALE FACE DEMONIC CAVE BEASTS!! LEAVE THEM ALONE WHITE PEOPLE/ASIANS YOUR RACE IS NO GOOD!!
@ZaydelZemirah Because in the traditional account from these peoples who journeyed east from africa, their traditions mention coming from "Saba" amongst other places. That is Hamitic lineage, and all/most africans reference these same ancestors as our origins.
white people leave my people alone go back to your own land u just want to learn so much about our people so that u can kill and still and destroy u r not but savages beast go home and leave my people be
Determining origin is more about finding out what families people derive from rather than where they are located. Just as if any of us were to trace our origins, we would'n't base it off who lives around us, we'd base it off who our ancestors were, places mentioned of origin, as well as genetic DERIVATION.
Common ties due to location have NOTHING TO DO W/ ORIGIN NECESSARILY.
You can have 2 groups living in the same location but their genetic tie is through intermarriage—not due to common origin.
@dalmar90 And you are just an idiot who can't think or reason for himself using common sense. You just parrot what you're told. Everything I listed is factual—and you can't disprove it, hon.
BY the Way, In Africa, we have no such concept as "Afrocentrism" we don't even know what it is—rather, we have the traditions and documents passed from our ancestors.
@dalmar90 They always try to dispute, but can never disprove anything with anything factual. LOL!
This stuff is easily documented, and you can find either in the scientific archives, from their reports, & when you talk to the indigenous people themselves.
It's amazing how dumbed down people are that despite the fact this info is easy to find & well documented—EVEN WITHIN THE SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRY—they still just parrot what is dictated to the public like slaves. LOL!
@dalmar90 You should be ashamed of yourself, If you are a horn african who knows your history. These people say they came from SABA, and wore the traditional Tshefrer.
If you are really east african, you should know what that is. LOL!
You are an embarrassment to the African people, and you need to go study our traditional histories and stop worshiping the western worlds history that they impose on us. LOL!
These people have nothing in common with East Africans. They even look nothing like them if you look past skin color, in fact according to recent genetic studies the average White European is closer to Africans than are Andaman Islanders!
Error #1: You can't compare MODERN east africans to these because the modern east african region is not settled the same way it was about 3,000 years ago. (people move and resettle become extinct etc.).
Error #2: They actually DO look like many African people beyond just "skin color." (Most people unfortunately still don't know what we look like. If they didn't look like us—we wouldn't notice them.)
@thotsins They look nothing like East Africans, and no the Andamese did not settle South Asia only 3,000 years ago. What a joke, they have been there for tens of thousands of years.
@dalmar90 You are just parroting western industry. YOU ALSO SEEM TO NOT KNOW WHAT AFRICANS LOOK LIKE.
And you seem to have forgotten or not picked up on the fact I said "THE MODERN EAST AFRICAN REGION IS NOT SETTLED THE SAME WAY IT WAS 3,000 YEARS AGO."
@dalmar90 The traditions of the people mention places of origins—THAT ONLY WE KNOW BETWEEN US— that existed only about 3,000 years ago. THEY ALSO HAD A WRITING SYSTEM ON BOARD.
Writing is a MARKER OF MODERN MAN only having been in existence for about 6,000 years at the most. This means the voyage was within that time.
SCIENTIFIC RADIOCARBON DATES ARE ADMITTEDLY FLAWED by the industry, due to the admission that they can tend to be greatly INFLATED by millions of years.
Error #3: You don't know what ALL the genetic studies show, cuz simply—you did not do the testing or at least obtain ALL the raw reports of test results, so you really don't know what they are genetically finding.
Error #4: The genetic data they have reported show they have mtDNA M, of which it's variations are also found in Africa because—THEY ARE ONE OF GENE STRAINS PASSED THROUGH THE HAMITIC FAMILIAL LINE. Which would make them kin to the rest of us.
Error #5: "the average White European is closer to Africans than are Andaman Islanders!"
Stop just PARROTING imposed data from the industry, without any verification and proper interpretation of the data.
The genetic standard for relation used by industry is incorrect cuz it is based off MODERN GENE GEOGRAPHICAL LOCALE, rather than GENE FAMILIAL DERIVATIVE. Where genes are located DO NOT determine origin —just where populations moved and settled. GENEALOGY determines origin.
@thotsins If you do not accept modern science I think disccusing with you is futile. Latest genetic studies show that White people from Europe are closer to Africans than are the Andamese or other Australoids.
@dalmar90 I don't accept "MODERN" science—I accept FACTUAL science.
And again to rest your conclusions on a foundation THE INDUSTRY ITSELF ADMITS TO BEING FLAWED is foolish and naive.
You don't know how to think—you just PARROT whatever the few rich guys who run the industry dictate to you. African are not closer to Europeans simply because we do not come through the same family lines.
The exact genes in common between Africa & Europe are due to intermarriage—& it's historically documented.
Error # 6: You believe humans came into existence according to a theoretical context of evolution that—not only has been admitted to not be proven by the scientific industry—but even more COLLAPSES under real scientific scrutiny.
One day you'll learn to think—and not just parrot. Thanks.
@dalmar90 LOL! These poor people just worship the industry & whatever they dictate instead of paying attention to what the actual scientific evidence—all of it—really presents.
@dalmar90 dalmar90 your an idiot, forget all the scientific jargon, there is no point in explaining to some egocentristic white turd. You don't know shit about what you are talking about, and from what I have seen thotsins, is more well informed on the subject than some retarded white american that i KNOW you are.
FACT # 1: These people are "black" — mongoloids & euroeans don't produce black people. Only WE produce other black people. Science proves things through experimentation—there is no scientific experiment that proves any other people produce "black people"— but "black people."
FACT # 2: The M Haplogroup & all it's variations, along with the other genes of Negritos, except O which is "mongoloid"—are all haplogroups possessed and passed from the HAMITIC FAMILIAL LINE.
FACT # 3: This is why pacific islander & African trace our origins to the same families traditionally, mentioning many of the same regions & ancestors, and a split in the families. Africans, we mention them GOING from our ancient homes EAST to Asia—islanders mention themselves as COMING from the WEST from the same homelands, which among the party were mentioned the negritos or "little people."
FACT # 4: SCIENCE IS NOT EXEMPT FROM FLAWED INTERPRETATION OF DATA.
@dalmar90 So YES these people have a lot in common with us—THEY ARE OUR IMMEDIATE KIN, AND WE VIEW THEM AS SUCH.
Just cuz they left & went east, & we stayed & went west, does NOT sever the familial bond, just like if your brother/sister moved somewhere else & had offspring, it would not sever their relation to you.
The haplogroups of brown negritos, & brown Africans—ALL WERE POSSESSED, CAME FROM, & PASSED by the SAME Khami family line. We just simply split & settled in two different locations.
@dalmar90 WHAT THE FUCK KIND OF RETARDED GENETIC STUDIES ARE YOU READING. Listen inbred. What RECENT genetic studies show, is that the andaman islanders are closely related to the first group of people that LEFT africa. MEANING, their DNA shows that they are descendants of africans. JUST LIKE EVERY other group of people. And if you look past skin color SHUT THE FUCK UP, skin color, facial features PEPPERCORN HAIR, sir im sorry but do u see whites with peppercorn hair? + all the facts thotsins
@cobracongo They will forever deny. But what kills me is black people who deny. And then you prove it and they dismiss it. Are we that sick? How is it that the only community I can agree with is on freakin youtube? Even the African brothers and sisters I've talked to have been fooled. Black people, Brown people, Red people, Yellow people and whatever other colored people there may be, better unite. Tell me how one country is fighting a world war. WTF?
@thotsins He is an idiot ignore him and block his colonized ass. Many Africans africans have a colonized way of thinking. This is why they will always be slaves.
Foreigners need to leave these beautiful people alone, they get ill after coming into contact with some of you and because they haven't come across your disease they cant' fight the infections...please leave them alone.
@buhleke Actually there is a quarantine zone on the Andaman Islands, Africans and Europeans in fact all non-Asians have to be medically screened before coming into contact with the Jarawa.
Do you see what a happy and loving people the jarawa are? Every last single one of them is smiling, open, and genuinely sincere in the love of his fellow man.
@ebeledi Some of the Africans who traveled in this coastal migration still remember that they came from Africa. And THEY even admit our cultures are the same.
@ebeledi So who to you, then, out of all these peoples resemble the Andamanese culturally the most? Andamanese watch?v=qwRY6nbq424 Us Africans ? watch?v=CQjguWnEpB8 Hindi Indians? (nearby the Andamanese) watch?v=88qu-tgUCB8&feature=related The Thai? (nearby the Andamanese) watch?v=C0br0EjEWZY Or the Burmese? (nearby the Andamanese) watch?v=21Gwwo4b8Ac Who? The answer is obvious. These are Savai pygmies who split from us and travelled in the coastal migration from Africa to Asia.
@TheXanian And as far as DNA, rather than gullibly depending on what's shoved down our throats by western scientific industries, the only way to be sure about what haplogroups they have is to take the blood samples YOURSELF, or at least obtain ALL THE REPORTS THOROUGHLY. Otherwise you really can't be sure.
But we know these people are Cushite Africans because we also share linguistic ties.
although 60,000 years ago is pseudo science, as during the voyage traditions of our peoples documented a WRITING SYSTEM being on board and writing is a marker of MODERN MAN being only 6,000-7,000 years old. So this voyage of Africans took place during that time frame, and between Africa and the Islands, we document it TRADITIONALLY as happening about 3,000 years ago. No evolving took place—just assimilation from that point onward between the Savai and southern Chinese.
... and the M strain is documented as originating in East Africa/Arabia before going east along the coast to settle southeast asia and the pacific and multiplying—which is PRECISELY in harmony with oral traditions of our peoples between the islands and Africa of our ancestors who left Africa and travelled along the coastal trade routes to get to indonesia, coastal asia, and pacific islands—they were mariners known as the people of "Savai." ...
@TheXanian Yea, that's one of the NUMEROUS CUSHITE genes. Winding up in Asia by way of the "Great Coastal Migration." Greeks documented the event calling it the "Cushite Split." In the south pacific it's traditionally documented as the voyage of the Kamami, Malea, and Kawa ni tama Lailai (pygmies) Africans. In Africa, we remember it as the "people who left to go east." Our origins traditionally are in the Arabia and East Africa before going into the African interior...
@moonstar7 Yea, the first to colonize and settle certain locations of the world as a result of being the first two world empires.
In Africa, traditionally we call Ham "Kham, Khem, Khami" etc. and we call Mizraim "Msiri, Misiri" etc. our earliest ancestors and progenitors who split to settle both the eastern and western regions
Wow I have never heard of these people before they clearly look black..Why do we learn anyone outside of African isn't black but they clearly look it..
Because we Khami people settled in all the areas of the world with the most resources. If we were all classified as one people, we'd have ownership of too many of the most resourceful regions of the world collectively. So it's politics. In order for the other empires to hold onto the wealth and the cultures, they have to classify the Khamis that live there under their ethnic stock.
Also because the desire of politics is to ensure Africa maintains a destitute appearance in order to hinder foreign investment and keep their U.S enforced governments there in place that help ship all our resources to 1st world nations to keep them rich.
It also keeps people unaware that we traveled so as to keep the false evolution theory of "everyone coming from africa" and "africans are primitive and stone age" idea in place.
If we correctly were classified globally as one people, then we'd resourcefully and culturally hold too much of the world's wealth that other empires are depending on to enrich themselves and become the world power all over again. So they have to divide us up and classify us as being related other peoples to keep that from happening.
In Africa, we call these people "Kwa" etc. They descend from the original pygmy families of East Africa. These ones were among the "little peoples" as spoken of in tradition that traveled out with the ancestors of pacific islanders. They settled and stayed in parts of asia like the Phillippines, Malaysia, etc. while traveling along the trade route about 3000 years ago, but they still speak related languages to us in Africa, remarkably.
You know, I think if all of us dug down deep into our ancient traditions in Africa we'd find out the DETAILED history of who they were and what parts of East Africa they left from and what peoples they descended from. We could find all the common ancestors and place names and histories and precisely WHY they left. We've already found some, but I know there's A LOT more. In Africa we need to keep on digging into our oral traditions.
indeed fam.. ur right.. but theres this very innteligent broda that acctualy put wat we talking aBout to work. by traveling all over the world for this type of reason.. and hes name is Runoko Rashidi.. and theres also many other brodas n sistas... Peace.. i suggest you check them out by the way.. Names: Runoko Rashidi if you cant find it then google his name up to get the propper spelling on hes name........ Peace Family!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yea, I use to work with him. We had dinner together when I was in the field. I respect Runoko's work. And although, a lot of what he says is true, some things he's a little off on.
WE hold all the traditions in our oral and written histories, and we still have them. Afro-americans don't have these anymore, so it's harder for them to legitimize what they say. When we supplement people like Runoko with the actual traditional documentation, it becomes more than just a claim; it becomes proof.
Most people don't listen to Afro-Americans cuz they know they went through slavery, and so they try to use that as an excuse to say that since their culture was taken away, they don't know what they are talking about but are just trying to claim other cultures to rebuild their esteem.
When we back it up as people who still possess our cultures, there's no disproving that.
Since we still possess our cultures and histories it's much easier to find the evidence for where we travelled in the past.
EX. RUNOKO went to Fiji and heard their account of coming from Africa. He mentions scientific support to back it up. But since the scientific industry is selective of what they permit and don't to be public, he can't find all the evidence. Then the industry deliberately publishes partial, slanted findings to distort the truth claiming there's no evidence to support the Fijian account, not linguistically, culturally, genetically etc. so his work doesn't look as credible.
But then, me as an African researcher, can disprove the scientific industry's claim because being an African I know firsthand that we DO IN FACT, not only have the ties they claim we don't, but also can complete the Fijian account because the places, tribes, and peoples Fijians mention as their origin, are places we recognize by name. So when we speak, it's more heavyweight because we have our cultures to delve into and can find the connections in our traditional practices ancestors.
That statement speaks for many, thank you for having such an intellectual mind brother because that is exactly what Afro-Americans face but like they say:
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
But when it comes to Fijians it's all in the hair texture peripheral studies.
Check out my video Jealousy Bred Divide and Conquer when you get the time.
Sure family. We're always glad to support our people. I hate when ignorant people try to use slavery against Afro-americans. African americans didn't really lose our culture. It survived in Hip Hop, Jazz, Ebonics, the way we dress, R & B, rock, bluegrass, swing, soul food, salsa, rumba, certain customs etc—all the Afro-american cultures that are at present having a strong influence worldwide. LOL!
Afro-americans still know their people by instinct when they see them. And we back yall up.
I live in the states now, and so many things Afro-americans do my whole family sees are just carryovers from africa. I'm even African american cuz I'm a citizen here. Just cuz we're spread out in different locations doesn't make us become different people. We're still the Kami/Cushite people as we've always been. People can't talk to Afro-americans like they don't know their culture. They're always telling us to forget about slavery—they're the ones who need to forget about slavery. LOL!
good to see a friendly encounter!! so are these the guys from the andaman islands!? u got the best collection of videos on the subject that I've come across!! Im from haiti, born in mexico, live in australia, and married to a melanesian so I love learnin new things about black culture, which seems to have been so far spread round the world, yet is little known. I'm particlrly interested in connections with log drums, from africa thru central america, polynesia n melanesia, n u got china!!
Ignorance is bliss, thanks to my visionary quest for knowledge I don't agree with [thebadassoromo] & the Somalian guy that you had this debate with, eventhough I'm Somali my self. The real children of Kush are not limited only in the horn, but many parts of the mainland of Africa including the southern Sudan, this joyous & beautiful pple remind me of my friends in Kenya the 'Jalwa' tribe and the Dinka tribe of S-Sudan. I don't know Y brothers believe the Whites when they murdered & slaved Africa
gurmad911 1 month ago
Why is there an argument about these African people. If it walks like a duck quaks like a duck and swims like a duck then it must be a duck no matter where in the world it is. People need to stop the nonsence that Africans did not travel by sea and migrate to other parts of the world.They did it in ancient times that's why we have all these deffrent races on the planet. To pretend that Africans never traveled is as silly as telling children about Sant Nick and gifts for good kids in the world.
specialbusingwasgood 2 months ago
I pray there is are still 300 of these beautiful brothers and sister left. Beware when others come riding in on their boats coming as friends...we know that story to well...they will bringt their diseases, homosexuality, hate and everything else that destroys people. They are BEAUTIFUL
4realpeepl 2 months ago 3
White mans days of doin evil is coming to a end. He may have money but he cant control a higher power thats coming to earth .....
LAClippersfan2 3 months ago
Only 200? There Must Be Some Serious Founder Effect, Genetic Drift, And Inbreeding Going On In That Population.
PeeGeeBeeDee 3 months ago
I feel sadness seeing this, purely for the reason that you know Europeans will invade them at some point. Please God don't make the devil destroy theses people too!
BlackSapphire8804 3 months ago
@BlackSapphire8804 Indians aren't European though.
Dzongka 3 months ago
@abshirsen if thats true what you say then cushites extent all the way into west africa ,rwanda,congo and beyond because many people fit that description as afroasiatic and even some african americans and afro carribeans as well.The true seat of the ckush empire of in nubia which is Sudan
bignasxl 5 months ago
@bignasxl Yep! And who really created that idea that "Cushite" is only the category of the people with "long muscles, thin tall, thin hair, fine and long pointed noses" anyway?
The early descriptions of Cushite people around the world sure don't—neither do the ancient depictions either.
The ancient descriptions and depictions of cushites show a RANGE.
Westerners made up that idea that Cush only refers to a few ethiopian/somali tribes.
thotsins 5 months ago
My Ppl! This makes me proud.
Bsmurfdizzle 5 months ago
@abshirsen Actually, the REAL cushites are all those who descend from the ancestor KUSH and his descendants—which include MANY brown peoples across the earth—that is if you know the histories and traditional genealogies of brown peoples of the earth.
thotsins 6 months ago
@thotsins ,
LMAO at the real kushites are all those who descend from ancestors kush and his descendant-which include many brown people across the earth -that is if you know the histories and traditional genealogies of the brown people of the earth" LOOK here stop relating yourself and other people to my Hamitic/kushitic people. I am Oromo and only the people who are related to my Oromo people can be called kushites.
THEBADASSOROMO 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO (HUGE SIGH!!!) Hon, I JUST had this conversation with a somalian yesterday, & he after going through our genealogies in the african interior—he was left speechless without the ability to prove wrong the fact that the rest of africans are also cushite descent. Please just stop, I'm tired of repeating myself.
The problem with people like you is that you think you guys in the horn of africa are the only Africans that have genealogies that trace back to Kush. I pity your ignorance.
thotsins 4 months ago
@thotsins ,
look you afrocentric turd, only the Oromo and the people who are related to the Oromo can be called kushites.
I suggest you stop talking out of you're arse and provide me with scientific proof such as genetic and anthropology that proof these people are related to my kushitic people.
THEBADASSOROMO 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO Hon, the only way to find out what genes were spawned through kush is by studying the traditional genealogies. Genetic by itself doesn't necessarily reveal WHO SPAWNED THEM since people over time can intermarry with each other—you have to analyze genealogies along with it in order to determine that to find out what peoples crossed and mingled over time to determine genetic origins, as well as test genes of bones. That hasn't been done extensively in Africa.
thotsins 4 months ago
@thotsins ,
don't hun me, you Afro-turd. you yet to provide me with any sort of scientific evidence such as anthropology, genetic and linguistic that pack up your desperate claims to relate yourself and other people to my kushitic people.
THEBADASSOROMO 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO What was the ORIGINAL language & DNA of KUSH, his wife and his immediate sons: Raamah, Saba, Sabteca, Havilah etc.?
Let's have YOU provide the "scientific, anthropological, and linguistic" answer to that question, hon.
thotsins 4 months ago
@thotsins ,
OMG you're changing the subject, because you don't have any scientific evidence to pack up you're bullshit claims that you and these people in your videos are kushites. since I am the one who asked you to provide me with scientific proof such as linguistic, anthropology and genetic. you got owned.
THEBADASSOROMO 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO Stop being so over dramatic and just answer the question. The subject is the same, you asked me for scientific evidence to show that inland africans are Kushite descent.
Since you were the first to try to dispute my statement that inland africans are also Kushite descent, I asked you what your basis is for that belief. I'm also asking for evidence—based on facts— to back up your claim that we are not, if you can that is.
thotsins 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO You can only prove what genes or language is Kushite or not if you have a base starting point to compare modern genes and linguistics of africans too. The questions is—DOES THAT EXIST?
Just as you can trace french, spanish, etc to Latin, why? Because we have the language of early latin. So my question to you is, What was the early Kushite language and Gene haplogroups to compare modern linguistics and haplotypes of africans too? Tell me.
thotsins 4 months ago
@thotsins ,
stop changing the subject, and i have time to waste on someone like you who can't provide a scientific proof to pack up their claim.
i asked you several times to provide me with genetic, linguistic and anthropology proof that those people in you're video are kushites. yet you couldn't.
THEBADASSOROMO 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO First off, sweetie, this is MY channel & MY video, so I CALL THE SHOTS.
I never said I couldn't any evidence that the rest of Africans are descendant from Kush & Ham.
But since YOU were the first to try to dispute that FACT. It should be YOU who gives evidence to support your claim that we are not.
Sounds like you're just dodging the subject cuz you don't have any solid evidence, just a blind belief. I asked you FIRST, before you asked me, what the basis for your belief was.
thotsins 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO So go ahead ... If you really have any solid evidence, it shouldn't be so hard to relay it. I've already relayed the evidence to support the fact that we are Hamitic/Kushite on numerous other videos, hon. So it's your turn.
So the question is, IS THERE ANY SUBSTANTIAL, SOLID, THOROUGHLY RESEARCHED & RELIABLE evidence linguistically & genetically to support your claim that we are NOT descendant from Ham and Kush?
thotsins 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO I already provided a simple answer to your question about LINGUISTICS. Answer these questions correctly: Did the early Kushites originally speak any language mixed with or related to semetic languages, like "Afro-Asiatic" is?
How many ancient Kushite Scripts have been found documenting the ORIGINAL language of the Early, Original Kushites (unmixed)?
What was their content, were any of the Scripts of "Afro-Asiatic" stock?
Go ahead, your answer? ...
thotsins 4 months ago
As far as genetics, what is/are the Kushite Gene(s)?
And what is the basis of your answer?
Is the notion that only certain Horn Africans are Kushite/Hamitic even based on Genetics or Linguistics, or rather—is it based on accounts of genealogies taken by foreigners like the arabs & europeans of only a few tribes in the Horn Africa which caused them to only label a few horn africans as Kushite & assume their
genes & language must be the so called "Kushite" genes/languages?
Your answer? ...
thotsins 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO I've studied this aspect of science for over a decade & know that re: african studies, most scientists ADMIT they haven't even done THOROUGH excavations or research of any Africans on any level to provide any solid conclusions about our origins. Simply put—IT'S NEGLECTED.
So go ahead and answer ALL the questions CORRECTLY.
I'm being fair about this, if you can provide any evidence, I'll take a look at it.
Go ahead, I'm waiting ...
thotsins 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO LOL! Ya know, it is very sad that you couldn't even provide the very same evidence you asked me for to back & prove your claims. LOL!
I already knew you wouldn't be able to, because there isn't any solid evidence scientifically to prove that only a few horn africans are the only Kushite since the industry admits no real extensive excavations or research have been carried on the topic.
LOL! Pathetic.
thotsins 1 month ago
@THEBADASSOROMO As far as language, don't even attempt to say their original language was "Afro-asiatic," (a recent western-created classification) cuz it's a known historical fact that early Hamitic peoples used interpreters to speak to Shemetic speakers. This means if your language is derived from Afro-asiatic—they didn't speak what you speak. LOL!
So, no, up until this point nobody's gotten "owned" nothing. LOL!
Now, for Genes. Your answer to the question, please ...
??
thotsins 4 months ago
@THEBADASSOROMO I have no idea where these few horn african tribes got the CRAZY idea that they are the only Cushites. LOL! Kush had way over 30 LARGE groups of people descend from him—and these few (not all) ignorant horn africans think all these HUGE families are only preserved in just a few tribes in the horn of africa?
That is so illogical. LOL! A person has to be really either dumb, ignorant, and/or brainwashed to think that. LOL!
I wonder if horn africans get this idea from whites.
thotsins 4 months ago
African "Negritos' traveled all the way to the Phillipines. Amazing. Western White Culture does not want us to know of our African roots.
moatwog 6 months ago
these are definately some of gods chosen people
Sensirebel 6 months ago
Hamites and Cushites? They were black? So, doesn't that mean that the original Egyptians were black? Ham was the progenitor of western and southwestern areas including Egypt and Ethiopia. (not a troll).
patricknonstar 7 months ago
Reminds me of scenes in Avatar the great moral based movie that while reaping in more profits didn't when the highest award. It touched slimy and devilsh nerves.
jazz1bro 7 months ago
These people are white, just asks any white person, just like the Egyptians. lol
trinitodbone4 7 months ago 3
@trinitodbone4
Yea, LOL!
They are white "caucasoids" who simply just have dark brown skin, tight kinky hair, lush full lips and flat noses who speak a language and have a dna strain related and derived from the same stock as Africans.
LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!
thotsins 7 months ago 3
@thotsins I DON'T KNOW WHO ARE WHAT YOU ARE BUT PLEASE DON'T CALL THESE PEOPLE CAUCASOIDS THESE CHILDREN OF THE SUN ARE VERY BEAUTIFUL BROTHERS AND SISTERS ARE DOWNRIGHT GORGEOUS IN MY EYE SIGHT!! WHITE CAUCAZOIDS ALBINOIDS ARE PALE FACE HAIRY NASTY LOOKING CAVE BEASTS TO ME WHITE ALBINOIDS ARE UNNATURAL LOOKING CREATURES THAT ARE HARD ON THE EYES!! I FEAR FOR THESE PEOPLE WHEN THEY COME IN CONTACT WITH PALE FACE DEMONIC CAVE BEASTS!! LEAVE THEM ALONE WHITE PEOPLE/ASIANS YOUR RACE IS NO GOOD!!
gloriacamel2006 7 months ago 7
@gloriacamel2006 It was a joke, not literal, making fun of the stupidity of the westerners who try to call these call these people "caucasoids." LOL
thotsins 7 months ago 5
@trinitodbone4 lol yeah they were just white with super dark tans
jamie201120 5 months ago
In response to dalmar90's comment "East Africans are closer to Whites ..."
NOTE: Africans are NOT closer to Europeans than "Blacks" of Asia.
Genealogically & Historically, the genetic relation between Africans & Europeans is simply due to intermixing.
In order to find out who is really related to who—YOU MUST DISCOVER WHICH ANCIENT FAMILIES PRODUCED/PASSED EACH GENETIC HAPLOGROUP.
This means you have to know be familiar with who the ancient races of antiquity were & their genealogies.
thotsins 7 months ago
I am proud to say I have this in my blood
JayCdaAeta3464 7 months ago
what part of asia is this?
Aminkhan786 8 months ago
@Aminkhan786 Andaman Islands
thotsins 8 months ago
how do you know that these are cushites/hamitic people??
ZaydelZemirah 8 months ago
@ZaydelZemirah Because in the traditional account from these peoples who journeyed east from africa, their traditions mention coming from "Saba" amongst other places. That is Hamitic lineage, and all/most africans reference these same ancestors as our origins.
thotsins 8 months ago
@ZaydelZemirah Also there genes have M strain, which is Hamitic lineage as well.
thotsins 8 months ago
white people leave my people alone go back to your own land u just want to learn so much about our people so that u can kill and still and destroy u r not but savages beast go home and leave my people be
ColeJ89 10 months ago
@ColeJ89 I didnt see ANY white people in this video...what are you talking about?
mrtundra45 10 months ago
Determining origin is more about finding out what families people derive from rather than where they are located. Just as if any of us were to trace our origins, we would'n't base it off who lives around us, we'd base it off who our ancestors were, places mentioned of origin, as well as genetic DERIVATION.
Common ties due to location have NOTHING TO DO W/ ORIGIN NECESSARILY.
You can have 2 groups living in the same location but their genetic tie is through intermarriage—not due to common origin.
thotsins 10 months ago
Dude..East Africans are closer to Whites than they are to these midget black Indians. You are just one crazy Afrocentrist.
dalmar90 10 months ago
@dalmar90 And you are just an idiot who can't think or reason for himself using common sense. You just parrot what you're told. Everything I listed is factual—and you can't disprove it, hon.
BY the Way, In Africa, we have no such concept as "Afrocentrism" we don't even know what it is—rather, we have the traditions and documents passed from our ancestors.
You like Eurocentric extremist propaganda.
Thank you very much. LOL!
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 They always try to dispute, but can never disprove anything with anything factual. LOL!
This stuff is easily documented, and you can find either in the scientific archives, from their reports, & when you talk to the indigenous people themselves.
It's amazing how dumbed down people are that despite the fact this info is easy to find & well documented—EVEN WITHIN THE SCIENTIFIC INDUSTRY—they still just parrot what is dictated to the public like slaves. LOL!
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 You should be ashamed of yourself, If you are a horn african who knows your history. These people say they came from SABA, and wore the traditional Tshefrer.
If you are really east african, you should know what that is. LOL!
You are an embarrassment to the African people, and you need to go study our traditional histories and stop worshiping the western worlds history that they impose on us. LOL!
thotsins 10 months ago
These people have nothing in common with East Africans. They even look nothing like them if you look past skin color, in fact according to recent genetic studies the average White European is closer to Africans than are Andaman Islanders!
dalmar90 10 months ago
@dalmar90
Error #1: You can't compare MODERN east africans to these because the modern east african region is not settled the same way it was about 3,000 years ago. (people move and resettle become extinct etc.).
Error #2: They actually DO look like many African people beyond just "skin color." (Most people unfortunately still don't know what we look like. If they didn't look like us—we wouldn't notice them.)
thotsins 10 months ago
@thotsins They look nothing like East Africans, and no the Andamese did not settle South Asia only 3,000 years ago. What a joke, they have been there for tens of thousands of years.
dalmar90 10 months ago
@dalmar90 You are just parroting western industry. YOU ALSO SEEM TO NOT KNOW WHAT AFRICANS LOOK LIKE.
And you seem to have forgotten or not picked up on the fact I said "THE MODERN EAST AFRICAN REGION IS NOT SETTLED THE SAME WAY IT WAS 3,000 YEARS AGO."
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 The traditions of the people mention places of origins—THAT ONLY WE KNOW BETWEEN US— that existed only about 3,000 years ago. THEY ALSO HAD A WRITING SYSTEM ON BOARD.
Writing is a MARKER OF MODERN MAN only having been in existence for about 6,000 years at the most. This means the voyage was within that time.
SCIENTIFIC RADIOCARBON DATES ARE ADMITTEDLY FLAWED by the industry, due to the admission that they can tend to be greatly INFLATED by millions of years.
Thanks.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90
Error #3: You don't know what ALL the genetic studies show, cuz simply—you did not do the testing or at least obtain ALL the raw reports of test results, so you really don't know what they are genetically finding.
Error #4: The genetic data they have reported show they have mtDNA M, of which it's variations are also found in Africa because—THEY ARE ONE OF GENE STRAINS PASSED THROUGH THE HAMITIC FAMILIAL LINE. Which would make them kin to the rest of us.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90
Error #5: "the average White European is closer to Africans than are Andaman Islanders!"
Stop just PARROTING imposed data from the industry, without any verification and proper interpretation of the data.
The genetic standard for relation used by industry is incorrect cuz it is based off MODERN GENE GEOGRAPHICAL LOCALE, rather than GENE FAMILIAL DERIVATIVE. Where genes are located DO NOT determine origin —just where populations moved and settled. GENEALOGY determines origin.
thotsins 10 months ago
@thotsins If you do not accept modern science I think disccusing with you is futile. Latest genetic studies show that White people from Europe are closer to Africans than are the Andamese or other Australoids.
dalmar90 10 months ago
@dalmar90 I don't accept "MODERN" science—I accept FACTUAL science.
And again to rest your conclusions on a foundation THE INDUSTRY ITSELF ADMITS TO BEING FLAWED is foolish and naive.
You don't know how to think—you just PARROT whatever the few rich guys who run the industry dictate to you. African are not closer to Europeans simply because we do not come through the same family lines.
The exact genes in common between Africa & Europe are due to intermarriage—& it's historically documented.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90
Error # 6: You believe humans came into existence according to a theoretical context of evolution that—not only has been admitted to not be proven by the scientific industry—but even more COLLAPSES under real scientific scrutiny.
One day you'll learn to think—and not just parrot. Thanks.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 The objective is to be FACTUAL—not modern.
Modern doesn't mean it's Factual. LOL!
The data you just presented collapses under THOROUGH SCIENTIFIC/TRADITIONAL EVIDENCE that is interpreted correctly.
This is why you have no comeback to prove it wrong, but can only resort to insults & stereotyped labels,
because you just parrot the popular belief—rather than the factual belief.
But thanks for trying.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 LOL! These poor people just worship the industry & whatever they dictate instead of paying attention to what the actual scientific evidence—all of it—really presents.
LOL!
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 "If you do not accept modern science I think disccusing with you is futile."
LOL! The reason why this girl/dude is so dumb, is because—everything I posted IS MODERN SCIENCE.
It's is the current data on record at present. LOL!
Can't believe how stupid people can be.
And then, they couldn't even spell the word "discussing" properly. LOL!
You are right, it will be futile talking to you. LOL!
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 dalmar90 your an idiot, forget all the scientific jargon, there is no point in explaining to some egocentristic white turd. You don't know shit about what you are talking about, and from what I have seen thotsins, is more well informed on the subject than some retarded white american that i KNOW you are.
ineedsomescrilla142 8 months ago
@dalmar90
FACT # 1: These people are "black" — mongoloids & euroeans don't produce black people. Only WE produce other black people. Science proves things through experimentation—there is no scientific experiment that proves any other people produce "black people"— but "black people."
FACT # 2: The M Haplogroup & all it's variations, along with the other genes of Negritos, except O which is "mongoloid"—are all haplogroups possessed and passed from the HAMITIC FAMILIAL LINE.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90
FACT # 3: This is why pacific islander & African trace our origins to the same families traditionally, mentioning many of the same regions & ancestors, and a split in the families. Africans, we mention them GOING from our ancient homes EAST to Asia—islanders mention themselves as COMING from the WEST from the same homelands, which among the party were mentioned the negritos or "little people."
FACT # 4: SCIENCE IS NOT EXEMPT FROM FLAWED INTERPRETATION OF DATA.
Hope that helps.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 So YES these people have a lot in common with us—THEY ARE OUR IMMEDIATE KIN, AND WE VIEW THEM AS SUCH.
Just cuz they left & went east, & we stayed & went west, does NOT sever the familial bond, just like if your brother/sister moved somewhere else & had offspring, it would not sever their relation to you.
The haplogroups of brown negritos, & brown Africans—ALL WERE POSSESSED, CAME FROM, & PASSED by the SAME Khami family line. We just simply split & settled in two different locations.
thotsins 10 months ago
@dalmar90 WHAT THE FUCK KIND OF RETARDED GENETIC STUDIES ARE YOU READING. Listen inbred. What RECENT genetic studies show, is that the andaman islanders are closely related to the first group of people that LEFT africa. MEANING, their DNA shows that they are descendants of africans. JUST LIKE EVERY other group of people. And if you look past skin color SHUT THE FUCK UP, skin color, facial features PEPPERCORN HAIR, sir im sorry but do u see whites with peppercorn hair? + all the facts thotsins
ineedsomescrilla142 8 months ago
Pictures speak louder than words and whites still deny
cobracongo 11 months ago
@cobracongo They will forever deny. But what kills me is black people who deny. And then you prove it and they dismiss it. Are we that sick? How is it that the only community I can agree with is on freakin youtube? Even the African brothers and sisters I've talked to have been fooled. Black people, Brown people, Red people, Yellow people and whatever other colored people there may be, better unite. Tell me how one country is fighting a world war. WTF?
OfSunFlowers 11 months ago
@cobracongo Some "black people" who are dumb enough to allow themselves to be brainwashed by western theory do to, like dalmar90.
thotsins 10 months ago
@cobracongo
Some "black people" who are dumb enough to allow themselves to be brainwashed by western theory do to, like dalmar90.
thotsins 10 months ago
@thotsins He is an idiot ignore him and block his colonized ass. Many Africans africans have a colonized way of thinking. This is why they will always be slaves.
cobracongo 10 months ago
slavery all over again. damn..
gregorio0321 1 year ago
Foreigners need to leave these beautiful people alone, they get ill after coming into contact with some of you and because they haven't come across your disease they cant' fight the infections...please leave them alone.
buhleke 1 year ago 15
@buhleke looool
DavidTheCatholic 1 year ago
@buhleke Actually there is a quarantine zone on the Andaman Islands, Africans and Europeans in fact all non-Asians have to be medically screened before coming into contact with the Jarawa.
greeny202a 4 months ago
hahahaha they cant stop touching the fat man...
CoconutIsle 1 year ago
Do you see what a happy and loving people the jarawa are? Every last single one of them is smiling, open, and genuinely sincere in the love of his fellow man.
Legend1One 1 year ago 11
@Legend1One Yep, it's our nature to be like that. Hospitality has always been a strong foundation in our cultures, it's tradition.
thotsins 1 year ago
Full time we see now world wide black people must and bring with us the few whites who Love us
Rholly82 1 year ago
@ebeledi Some of the Africans who traveled in this coastal migration still remember that they came from Africa. And THEY even admit our cultures are the same.
watch?v=oiA9QiAnA8I&feature=related
thotsins 1 year ago
thotsins 1 year ago
@TheXanian And as far as DNA, rather than gullibly depending on what's shoved down our throats by western scientific industries, the only way to be sure about what haplogroups they have is to take the blood samples YOURSELF, or at least obtain ALL THE REPORTS THOROUGHLY. Otherwise you really can't be sure.
But we know these people are Cushite Africans because we also share linguistic ties.
thotsins 1 year ago
although 60,000 years ago is pseudo science, as during the voyage traditions of our peoples documented a WRITING SYSTEM being on board and writing is a marker of MODERN MAN being only 6,000-7,000 years old. So this voyage of Africans took place during that time frame, and between Africa and the Islands, we document it TRADITIONALLY as happening about 3,000 years ago. No evolving took place—just assimilation from that point onward between the Savai and southern Chinese.
thotsins 1 year ago
... and the M strain is documented as originating in East Africa/Arabia before going east along the coast to settle southeast asia and the pacific and multiplying—which is PRECISELY in harmony with oral traditions of our peoples between the islands and Africa of our ancestors who left Africa and travelled along the coastal trade routes to get to indonesia, coastal asia, and pacific islands—they were mariners known as the people of "Savai." ...
thotsins 1 year ago
@TheXanian Yea, that's one of the NUMEROUS CUSHITE genes. Winding up in Asia by way of the "Great Coastal Migration." Greeks documented the event calling it the "Cushite Split." In the south pacific it's traditionally documented as the voyage of the Kamami, Malea, and Kawa ni tama Lailai (pygmies) Africans. In Africa, we remember it as the "people who left to go east." Our origins traditionally are in the Arabia and East Africa before going into the African interior...
thotsins 1 year ago
Haplogroup D-M174
TheXanian 1 year ago
Good video! The first and the original. The first sons of Ham (Africa) and connected to the seconds sons, Mizraim. I love African history!
moonstar7 1 year ago
@moonstar7 Yea, the first to colonize and settle certain locations of the world as a result of being the first two world empires.
In Africa, traditionally we call Ham "Kham, Khem, Khami" etc. and we call Mizraim "Msiri, Misiri" etc. our earliest ancestors and progenitors who split to settle both the eastern and western regions
thotsins 1 year ago 2
@thotsins Without a question!
moonstar7 1 year ago
Wow I have never heard of these people before they clearly look black..Why do we learn anyone outside of African isn't black but they clearly look it..
star83 2 years ago
Because we Khami people settled in all the areas of the world with the most resources. If we were all classified as one people, we'd have ownership of too many of the most resourceful regions of the world collectively. So it's politics. In order for the other empires to hold onto the wealth and the cultures, they have to classify the Khamis that live there under their ethnic stock.
Everyone wants a piece of us and our cultures.
thotsins 2 years ago
@thotsins That makes sense....How long ago was it that they settle there?...
star83 2 years ago
Traditions says between 2,500-3000 years, but the pseudo-scientific industries inflate the dates to make it seem much longer.
thotsins 2 years ago
Also because the desire of politics is to ensure Africa maintains a destitute appearance in order to hinder foreign investment and keep their U.S enforced governments there in place that help ship all our resources to 1st world nations to keep them rich.
It also keeps people unaware that we traveled so as to keep the false evolution theory of "everyone coming from africa" and "africans are primitive and stone age" idea in place.
thotsins 2 years ago
If we correctly were classified globally as one people, then we'd resourcefully and culturally hold too much of the world's wealth that other empires are depending on to enrich themselves and become the world power all over again. So they have to divide us up and classify us as being related other peoples to keep that from happening.
Politics, it's all politics.
thotsins 2 years ago
In Africa, we call these people "Kwa" etc. They descend from the original pygmy families of East Africa. These ones were among the "little peoples" as spoken of in tradition that traveled out with the ancestors of pacific islanders. They settled and stayed in parts of asia like the Phillippines, Malaysia, etc. while traveling along the trade route about 3000 years ago, but they still speak related languages to us in Africa, remarkably.
thotsins 2 years ago
Its amazing I know people that will see this video and say that these people ain't black! Can you believe that shit. What part of Asia is this?
tooblack09 2 years ago 2
The Andaman Islands off the eastern coast of India. These people look more African according to the stereotype than most of us in Africa.
thotsins 2 years ago
WOW!...
Antwansuperstar21 2 years ago
yea these fellow Cushites, are the Original Natives of asia, before other races migrated down and invaded on their lands.. so yeh good vid... Peace
CushiticSomalianMale 2 years ago 4
You know, I think if all of us dug down deep into our ancient traditions in Africa we'd find out the DETAILED history of who they were and what parts of East Africa they left from and what peoples they descended from. We could find all the common ancestors and place names and histories and precisely WHY they left. We've already found some, but I know there's A LOT more. In Africa we need to keep on digging into our oral traditions.
thotsins 2 years ago
indeed fam.. ur right.. but theres this very innteligent broda that acctualy put wat we talking aBout to work. by traveling all over the world for this type of reason.. and hes name is Runoko Rashidi.. and theres also many other brodas n sistas... Peace.. i suggest you check them out by the way.. Names: Runoko Rashidi if you cant find it then google his name up to get the propper spelling on hes name........ Peace Family!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CushiticSomalianMale 2 years ago
Yea, I use to work with him. We had dinner together when I was in the field. I respect Runoko's work. And although, a lot of what he says is true, some things he's a little off on.
WE hold all the traditions in our oral and written histories, and we still have them. Afro-americans don't have these anymore, so it's harder for them to legitimize what they say. When we supplement people like Runoko with the actual traditional documentation, it becomes more than just a claim; it becomes proof.
thotsins 2 years ago
Most people don't listen to Afro-Americans cuz they know they went through slavery, and so they try to use that as an excuse to say that since their culture was taken away, they don't know what they are talking about but are just trying to claim other cultures to rebuild their esteem.
When we back it up as people who still possess our cultures, there's no disproving that.
Since we still possess our cultures and histories it's much easier to find the evidence for where we travelled in the past.
thotsins 2 years ago
EX. RUNOKO went to Fiji and heard their account of coming from Africa. He mentions scientific support to back it up. But since the scientific industry is selective of what they permit and don't to be public, he can't find all the evidence. Then the industry deliberately publishes partial, slanted findings to distort the truth claiming there's no evidence to support the Fijian account, not linguistically, culturally, genetically etc. so his work doesn't look as credible.
thotsins 2 years ago
But then, me as an African researcher, can disprove the scientific industry's claim because being an African I know firsthand that we DO IN FACT, not only have the ties they claim we don't, but also can complete the Fijian account because the places, tribes, and peoples Fijians mention as their origin, are places we recognize by name. So when we speak, it's more heavyweight because we have our cultures to delve into and can find the connections in our traditional practices ancestors.
thotsins 2 years ago
That statement speaks for many, thank you for having such an intellectual mind brother because that is exactly what Afro-Americans face but like they say:
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
But when it comes to Fijians it's all in the hair texture peripheral studies.
Check out my video Jealousy Bred Divide and Conquer when you get the time.
AnarcissusRising 2 years ago
Sure family. We're always glad to support our people. I hate when ignorant people try to use slavery against Afro-americans. African americans didn't really lose our culture. It survived in Hip Hop, Jazz, Ebonics, the way we dress, R & B, rock, bluegrass, swing, soul food, salsa, rumba, certain customs etc—all the Afro-american cultures that are at present having a strong influence worldwide. LOL!
Afro-americans still know their people by instinct when they see them. And we back yall up.
thotsins 2 years ago
I live in the states now, and so many things Afro-americans do my whole family sees are just carryovers from africa. I'm even African american cuz I'm a citizen here. Just cuz we're spread out in different locations doesn't make us become different people. We're still the Kami/Cushite people as we've always been. People can't talk to Afro-americans like they don't know their culture. They're always telling us to forget about slavery—they're the ones who need to forget about slavery. LOL!
thotsins 2 years ago
good to see a friendly encounter!! so are these the guys from the andaman islands!? u got the best collection of videos on the subject that I've come across!! Im from haiti, born in mexico, live in australia, and married to a melanesian so I love learnin new things about black culture, which seems to have been so far spread round the world, yet is little known. I'm particlrly interested in connections with log drums, from africa thru central america, polynesia n melanesia, n u got china!!
djvj21 2 years ago