To everyone on this board. Believe what you wanna believe. I personally could care less. I didn't make my comments because I was trying to change minds. Only to see if anyone out ther was thinking. And to those attacks on my character, intelligence and or schooling Ad Hominem attacks only point out you can't deal with the questions at hand. You Kids have fun!
No one is saying you have to believe this stuff your just supposed to watch it and then think about it and then base conclusions on what you've seen... if that conclusion is that the info is not solid fact, that's great, but don't hop onto the comment boards and try to force us to believe what YOU think about the information presented. I don't care what you think, i care what i think, and that's the way everyone has and is going to feel forever.
life evolved here as organisms like stromatolites slowly released oxygen into the atmosphere changing it from a planet warming blanket of CO2 to a mix with 21% oxygen. It has remained that way for millenia and that is why the planets environment and the life forms on the planet are mutually beneficial.
What a load of dingos Kidneys. This video is pregnant with ifs, thens, and faulty conclusions based on flawed logic.Does anyone out there have a brain that works? Or are you all wnnabe trekies.
@mazinm2006 The first thing you learn when you come to university is that wikipaedia is a weak source for scientific information. I've been given this video as one of the only videos to base part of my actual course on. Do you really think a university with all it's professors and resources would be incorrect? Based on wikipaedia??
@mazinm2006 But aren't you saying they're wrong based solely on wikipaedia? And my point was not to trust wiki as the ultimate science bible. Also if you want some answers as to where the 1st cells might have come from this is one of the latest theories wwwDOTnatureDOTcom/news/1998/021202/full/news021202-2.html
@mazinm2006 Also it does say it is throroughly referenced and these references can be found at brainmind and gives you a link to check the refernces yourself
saying life came from another planet still doesn't explain how life came from non life it is just delays the answering of the question, it is possible and indeed plausible that life could come from other planets but that is not the origin of life. life still had to come from somewhere in addition to this any object that entered our solar system would gain an enormous amount of energy and if it were to enter the atmosphere that energy would convert to temp rise of 9000c nothing could survive
I watched all of these video and this guy, while smart. makes me SO ANGRY!
He keeps saying that life can't be created on life but had to come from,elsewhere, but doesn't explain where from... Primordial Soup a myth on earth, then wheres the explanation? He keeps saying this without backing himself up. He says it so certainly, with no facts behind him
I can beleive life formed elsewhere, martian metiors are proof, but what makes the soup idea anymore likely on ay other planet rather than earth?
@FuzzyLogicReality he's saying only life can PRODUCE life not create it. As in DNA unwrapping and coding new DNA strands is life producing life. Creating life is different, personally i think that it's created due to the physical properties of atoms. I mean all you need for the beginnings of a basic cell is a phospholipid by-layer and phospholipids can be formed just because of the attractions between the atoms within it pulling each other together
i had an experience which can be said to be an nde and in it my body started to vibrate very fast them i found myself in darkness and suddenly i notice a light its got bigger as i got closer the light look golden white as i got closer i don't know what my body if i had one look like but i somehow could feel the warm glow of the golden light maybe that could be were we and all life came from?(000)
Why don't these videos discuss where the FIRST life came from? This glaring omission drove me nuts watching all 5 parts, waiting in vain for this to be addressed.I'm fine with the idea that earthly life came from space, but there had to have been a FIRST life-form somewhere out there, which could NOT have "come from life" because it was the FIRST. Either some divine intelligence created the first life, or there WAS some "organic soup" on some planet somewhere in which the first creature formed.
life had to come from somewhere else? alright than where did that life come from??
this is idiotic - why can't we be a product of our world we have everything we need to live here - there is water - I think where there is water and the conditions fit - it would be hard for there not to be life
@stillstandin4you yeah we could be a product of our enviiroment but there is no evidence that water is a natureal resource because as i have read and studied frozen water comes from the farthest regions of space and if water was present on other plants or the solar system or galaxy then life could originate from other places in the universe and so happen to arrive here but my question is were does consciousness come from and how can matter which doesn't have awareness be aware at all?(000)
@stillstandin4you and also not and argument but maybe consciousness is infused with energy that converts to matter if it lowers it vibration i'd like to saggest the "living universe hypothesis" what that intales is that all matter and therefore energy since matter can be convert into energy and energy can be converted back into matter what if the mind is infused in sub-atomic energy that makes us up & what if the mind come from an the source of all energy and information.(000)
@stillstandin4you and i'd also like to say that an orginism grow or forms from the inside out not outisde in so were did the information come from you can't creat information you can only generate information which is always presence in one form or another in thermodynamics it says energy cannot be created nor destroyed so there has to be a place were this energy goes when or awareness goes when it is done with its current incarnation?
where did the life from space begin? God or life from non life, it had to begin somewhere can you explain that, the beginings of life, not just on earth but life itself from anywhere.
@canadiankewldude Non life is life itself thus is no such thing as non life,Life made Non life,Non life is just Life.Non is a "Parent" to something that is a live,Not dead.Dead is particles that slowly kill Life Which makes Non life.But it also kills Non life which makes the matter of Life Dissapear,Thus making it dossapear makes it Non Life.
It is very interested that most people who have no faith in God, come from western countries like Canada, America and such. No wonder for such shallow and ignorant nations to have such a narrow mind. God is everywhere! God Bless!
"Life coming only from life": its circular, and even if there was an creator: by asking how a creator came into existance is asking the same question at another level. At one point it HAS to be a "spontaneus generation". However there is an increasing number of indicies suggesting this was probably not of earthly origin. And there are really better examples of fossilized microbes in meteors than the one being mentioned (a proven hoax). Still highly informative.
@averycleverman If the first living forms or any type of life came from the big bang how did life get there in the first place if someone can answer that question i will kneel down and say god is just another way of brainwashing man
If the first living forms or any type of life came from the big bang how did life get there in the first place if someone can answer that question i will kneel down and say god is just another way of brainwashing man
This is a very interesting video but the conclusion is very wrong. The fact that life can exist and thrive in almost any conditions is itself evidence that life can evolve anywhere. DNA can be spontaneously formed anywhere in the universe by a process called zoesynthesis. the form that it takes depends on where it forms. But the species will always evolve in such a way as to be perfectly adapted to the environment in which it is.
@averycleverman "But the species will always evolve in such a way as to be perfectly adapted to the environment in which it is." That couldn't be more wrong or could be the best evidence for mankind to be aliens. How exactly would you explain our soft skin, everything can pierce it, we need shoes to survive, we need tools to survive in the world, how would you explain that? we are not ment for this world.
@banheden If the first living forms or any type of life came from the big bang how did life get there in the first place if someone can answer that question i will kneel down and say god is just another way of brainwashing man
This is a very interesting video but the conclusion is very wrong. The fact that life can exist and thrive in almost any conditions is itself evidence that life can evolve anywhere. DNA can be spontaneously formed anywhere in the universe by a process called zoesynthesis. the form that it takes depends on where it forms. But the species will always evolve in such a way as to be perfectly adapted to the environment in which it is.
"For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God's sight. As it is written: "He catches the wise in their craftiness"; 20 - and again, "The Lord knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile."
@29apr2010 Except leaving evidence of four legged bees, chickens, mosquitoes, ducks, flies. Leviticus 11:20 Except killing dews livestock. Exodus 9:6, except appearing with all his almighty power. Revelation 1:8, Except create man in Gods own image but the say he is not a man. Numbers 23:19. Except stopping the earth from moving. Psalm 104.5, except let woman speak or have any kind of power. 1 Timothy 2:11, need I go on? I suggest Science has most of the answers and religion not one answer!!
i like the videos except it pisses me off because have the stuff in here is just reused in your videos i cant tell you how many times ive heard life came from the stars
We must have a universal symmetry made out of nothing more than radiant energy and a universal process of symmetry breaking. That would make us the broken symmetry of our own evolutionary path.
Sure we can create life! babies.... and screw scientific explanation. You believe what you want to believe, some think " BIG BANG" and what caused the big bang? and what caused that? makes me wonder.
Nice humor. And right alderamin, but everyone is either " it was god or.... science.. but shit, believe watever :D im not telling you what to believe. :)
Well God from the Bible didnt create universe, i am sure about that(he has small penis, and he wants everyone to worship him, fuckin ego-maniac) The name BIG BANG was always funny to me, Maybe God organized universe's largest orgy and got premature ejaculation in one of the black (ass) Holes. Then black holes gave birth to Earth and other planets/stars... thats what happens when you have sex, without using
@nidzaPFC In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken. Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment (Matthew 12:31, 36, Genesis 1:1, Hebrews 9:27).
The leading current theory is based on the fact that if you put liquids and gases corresponding to the earth's atmosphere and ocean composition ~4 billion years ago and expose them to electric current and heat you will observe the formation of a variety of organic molecules such as amino acids. The origin of life would be a simple chemical reaction leading to the first self replicating molecules.
Put up or shut up. Build me a single reproducing living cell from the available amino acids. With the combined intelligence of past and present no one has come close to creating life. If with all this intelligence we can't create life, how is life going to evolve into existence given ANY number of years?
how is it more reasonable to assume life arrived on earth from other planets? thats just pushing the question back one step to where did the life that arrived here originate from.
personaly i think life on this planet is a mixture of what has originated here and what formed here on its own.
there is one point i must make known though, DNA strands are capable of randomly puting themselves together so DNA can come from sonething other than DNA.... base chemicals.
God was not crowned or made....that is what makes God, God. He is the Author of everything in existense. I am humbled and priviledged to live in the most astonishing, complex, beautiful, intelligent, inspiring, precise and amazing universe. Praise be to the Maker of all!
I stand by what I wrote 1 month ago. The very question you ask has a contradiction all in itself. If God is the Author and Maker of EVERYTHING that is in existense (as much as our limited minds comprehend that, and some arrogantly refuse it) then God therefore CANNOT be a created or appointed being. He then must be eternal, all-knowing and independent of anything.
even if life did arive here from other planets, where did their life come from, and their's?, and their's? Eventually, there would have been something from nothing, and that is immpossible, so God DOES exist, he DID start life
How do we exist to began with? God? really? Because how did god exist to begIn with? The big bang? How was there even a start to make the big bang? Just thinking about the very beginning makes my head hurt...
Maybe we don't exist...but we do exist...but we don't? Hmmmmmmm....
And this still doesn't address the real question of abiogenesis. While life, or it's precursors may have indeed arisen elsewhere in the solar system (mars most likely) and been transferred here by whatever means, the real question is: how did it start? We've got a much better idea thanks to the HHMI Szostak lab as well as from other researchers. Due to the nature of organic/biochemistry life may be ubiquitous where ever a planet is stable enough with the basic conditions.
Life on Earth Came From Other Planets: A comprehensive, thoroughly referenced scientific article, & additional chapters detailing the evidence in support of this theory, can be viewed and read for free, at the BrainMind website. Just go to the link located to the above right of this page.
Dr. Joseph's book: "Life on Earth Came From Other Planets: Origins, Evolution, Metamorphosis, Extinction," will be published this summer, and can be purchased from Amazon and the BrainMind website.
@Sarastarlight Life comes from the laws of physics. Some things R attracted 2 each other, & others repel. Natural selection over millions of years creates life under some conditions, & not others. It is the result of natural forces. It's not complicated. U R just a cult nutter who invents 'eternal life' as your object of idolatry. Grow a brain man.
The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szostak
@Sarastarlight I'm not against Panspermia, but ... let's see 1) Organic Soup is based on Carbon Chemistry, Carb. Chains are what forms the basic building blocks for life 2) Possibly. 3) Correct 4) Indeed 5) Far Fetched, no proof at all. 6,7) The Fossils finding is very controversial.8) Indeed, but it was a case of contamination, the microbe was identified as a common Streptococcus bacteria. 9) True, and there's plenty of proof. 10, 11) Applies to microscopic life only, not animals or plants.
"The only rational intelligent explanation?!? If only life can produce life, than the first creature to appear on earth came from other planets."
I guess it's quite possible that life came from space...however life in space came from where? Also, there is lot of other possible "rational intelligent explanation"...btw no one will ever have the certainty on how life originated, not even Dr Joseph!
Christians of this website, the judgement day have started already, please I urge you to depart from all form of unchristian conduct lest you be found not worthy to enter the kingdom of God. Please do not label my activity spam, I did not do it for that purpose.
Seems to make sense, i wonder where , was there a special planet where life first evolved ? Before it was shot into space, trying to enhabbit other planets.
'Where' is less of a question than 'how' did DNA first form...that is the one thing this this video fails to explain, however if this theory is true, then researching DNA origin would be near impossible since it originated on another planet.
That is why they propose that life would come from space. If they can avoid having us look into how DNA formed, they can claim it came from a god.
This video lost me when he mentioned cyanobacteria in his list, but failed to make the connection that blue-green algae are cyanobacteria. This is when I knew what he had to say was not from someone firing on all cylinders. While pan-spermia is a neat idea, we need to see what earthly possibilities can happen first.
the narrator sounds like Nicholas Cage... is the narrator Nicholas Cage? (oh and it is possible that there is life on one of the billions upon trillions of planets in the universe if there is life on one of them)
you may have come from a fish or ape, not I ! and you use the word GOD to much, thats something you worship right?, dont you think thats really silly and a stone age way of thinking?
if there was life on other planets the odds of intelligience must be slim,as all life that has ever evolved on the earth only us has evolved to a technilogical stage.also you have to consider time,the chance that two intelligences had lived at the same time with the means of contact are miniscule,but we can always HOPE
we humans need to explain everything with regards to our life,origin,its purpose and so on.....but i believe and i would like to say i know for a fact(99.99)% that there is simply no reason for our existance.
life forms exist when suitable conditions for life exist!
This is one theory. Who knows, it could be entirely accurat but just because something is possible doesn't mean its for sure and assuming so is irrational. This video jumps from one conclusion to another to another as if jumping to conclusions is scientific.
our ancestors probably didn't come from the stars, it's more assumable life appeared here due to conditions. Wich is interesting, because it means there's life everywhere.
so far i see no evolution only adaptation & change we are still as empty in majority when it comes to morals, are views on creation & spiritual believes, we are also killing are selves other animal life & the planet how is that better then past civilizations which had better connections with nature & the universe we are simply changing & adapting to are changing environment
theres a book coming out in 3 years time its about everthing thats got to do wit life, i no the writer and she's been writing that book for over 10 years now.
religions would still exist if people were to come up with a conclusion such as this, even more so if the conclusion came around in the middle age. Religions will always exist until everything is explained and even you do not know the secrets of the universe so who are you to judge besides it's usually not the religion that's bad, it's the idiots that pervert the message of the religion to fit their own needs and means.
I dont think so....religions dont need to exist and the only reason religions exist is coz the wealth of any nation is concentrated in the hands of a few and these hoes buld organizations(religions)to maintain their power over the general population.
people always corrupt a message. It wouldnt matter how innocent or divine it may be. It would somehow be corrupted by man. Besides mankind is always searching for a way to explain the universe around him/her. Until the species is dead religion will exist. How about a question? Do you believe in spirituality?
hey grimapocalypse2 sorry for the delay in answering ur question......the answer to ur question if I believed in spirituality....yes I do but it just another human invention for survival which means it is UNNECESSARY!
after the first minute the bullshit of a video is all ready circle reasoning and has no evidence to suport its theroys, "Other then the hand of God the only rational inteligent explanation for earthly life is life arived here from other planets" what a narrow minded sack of shit if i ever heard it, 2:05-2:20 yes they can surive in space but if they are only half a micrometer in diamter how will they enter the earths atmosphere an surive it? *LOAD OF CRAP, DONT WATCH*
hahahha, load of crap--that's your breath, moron. Ooooh, poor councishit, I think he's going to cray. Boo hooo... don't watch, please don't watch, or or or, I'll cry!
Hahhhahha. what a moron. That load of crap is your brain, hahhhahhaaa
You are a genius councilorM. Nothing could survive entering our atmosphere. Even if these rocks somehow made it to Earth before the atmosphere formed they would have been destroyed on impact or in the early molten Earth. I am too lazy to comment further on this crazy stuff. As a joke this is funny as hell.
If you enjoy our videos better download your copy now. The Google Gestapo has repeatedly threatened to close this account and we suspect they may act on their threats very soon. So, if you like this video, better make your copy now.
In the first video the narrator states over and over that 'the notion of non-living material spawning life is ridiculous and magical thinking' is quite annoying, when you're claiming that bacteria of unknown origin riding into a ball of lava from outer-space is more viable.
This whole series is a case of "I can't imagine, therefore it did not happen". The primordial soup might not be the correct answer for abiogenesis, but there is no more evidence for exogenesis. And in any case, these have nothing to do with evolution, since evolution only deals with life after it has begun, from the second generation up.
Although videos contain interesting ideas, they are heavily biased with little evidence. And if the seeds-of-life -hypothese is correct, how did those pop up?
"organic soup is a myth, life came from organic material from outer space" ... then where did the organic material from outer space come from?... and dont say "from another meteorite"!!! "DNA only comes from DNA" is not a proven statement. we dont know where it came from.
which do you think sound the best? the organic soup theory or this? i must say this theory cause the universe now is about 13,7 billion years old and who knows if not the big bang caused mutatuions or carbon atoms to form molecules later known as bacteria? A pretty steady fact is that the earths water came from meteors throughout the period 3,8 to 4,6 billion years ago, maybe bacterias came with those meteors and by shure they survived the impact. If species can live with a pressure of 9000
serious thought was put into this. but the deeper into the abyss you delve the darker it gets i.e. you're looking so deeply that you can no longer see clearly. these topics are fathomless and beliefs grow in multi-directions. all speculation and you have no really legitimate argument. however i'm going to watch more out of curiousity and will courteously stand corrected. In saying that.. this is the perfect example of freedom of speech. i'm not condemning i only wish to enrich my mind.
pounds per square centimeter then its pretty relevant. and it doesnt mean that the bacterias comming from meteors landed and stayed at the earths surface getting bombarded with new meteors. they could easily float in under some crack clearing its exposure of solar radiation, heat and volcanoes...
very interesting. so there's the differentiating opinions of science and religion... what's this? religion or science??? scientology?? wtf is all this. your just doing exactly what religion has done all along. except you're concocting it with science. speculative, selective information picking and bullshit derivations and hypothesis. organic soup?? lol.. atoms are present (in my opinion they were created.. by whom or what i dont know) atoms form molecules.. the building blocks of cells.
ask your self this question the universe is big why would god make a big universe if we are the only kind of life i think there are more life not just us maybe more
I do not doubt it, in fact it is my firm belief there exists other life in the universe. But, it is still conceivable to me that we may be alone in the galaxy wrt intelligent life, or galactic quadrant. I am not prepared to say how common simple life may be.
Given what would seem to be a relatively small window in geologic time between societies first forming and interstellar space travel however, we likely would have been visited by now by any "neighbors", given how appetizing Earth must be.
Indeed hotdakota300, even 1 microbe alive or not, came from an extraterrestrial oregon. Proves 100% beyond a shadow of a doubt, there is abundance of life throughout our universe. The only question I have now is. Is there intelligent life out there? If so, then what about other dimensions?
It is true that life is incredibly resilient in surviving extreme environments, but it too has limits. This is why the only known life is on planet Earth. Even so, there are places on planet earth, even on the surface, that have been found to be barren of life. Such as the Atacama Desert. It still has limits, and these limits are the norm in the universe, not the exception.
There is a continuous ladder bridging the most complex, inorganic compounds and the most complex living things. From acids/proteins, viruses, to humans. Inorganic compounds are the building blocks to "life". A human and a block of wood are both made out of atoms. At the atomic level, they are no different. They are all Hydrogen, Carbon, Oxygen atoms, etc. I mean, "life" in itself is a mythical term invented to describe the most complex chemical interactions. It's all a point of view.
Stevensw, your argument is logical and deserving of serious discussion and debate and leads to many other extremely interesting questions and issues, e.g. such as life related to consciousness, the nature of "death." In the original unedited version of my video, "The Evolution of Life on Other Planets" I explored the issues you've raised, but alas, the film was 2 hours in length and had to be severely cut.
Life coming only from life is obviously completely untrue, if this argument is true then where did the first life come from? Your argument suggests there has always been life. I doubt that strongly, especially since it so turns out that life could be such an exceptionally rare phenomenon that we may very well may be alone probably not in the universe, but certainly may be on this galaxy. Then again maybe not. But there aren't shards of "life" flying all around space.
stevensw, your argument in this posting is merely opinion and is refuted by the evidence. The facts are: only life can produce life. There is no evidence proving otherwise. Further in another post, you claim viruses are alive, which is not a view accepted by the majority of experts in this area. Third, your argument in this post conflicts with your statement: "A human and a block of wood are both made out of atoms. At the atomic level, they are no different...." etc.
Logically, it has to be right. Unless you can prove life existed before the big bang, your argument simply cannot be true. The first life had to come from somewhere non-living. Whether it's straight from inorganic matter, energy, or the void (simply came into being).
I never claimed viruses to be life. I never claimed they weren't. In fact, I do not believe in the term "life" by definition. I like to think of it more an urban term, to describe the most complex chemical reactions.
Regarding some of your videos in general, I think they are well done and I respect your opinions, and life certainly may not have originated on this planet. But you have some huge logical holes in your arguments.
As you so strongly point out, life is infinitely complex. BUT, it is also infinitely simple. Some consider the simplest forms of life to be viruses. Your arguments do in no way refute the possibility life originated from inorganic matter.
stevensw, your are 100% right when you state my videos do not "refute the possibility life originated from inorganic matter." What they have refuted (or nearly refuted) is the ridiculous notion that life ON EARTH originated from inorganic matter (e.g. organic soup). As detailed in my just released video, "Evolution of Life on Other Planets" evidence based on DNA, the fossil record, and thus evolutionary metamorphosis demonstrates that life on Earth came from other planets.
That is certainly possible, life may have come from elsewhere, perhaps even implanted by aliens. But I wouldn't refute it may have originated here either. I don't think we have close to the technological capacity to disprove this, and I think it's a very valid, if not the most valid argument.
If there is no question that the first life originated from non-life, then logically it must be possible that life on Earth originated from non-life.
That may explain how life arrived on earth, but that still doesn't explain where that spacelife came from, and since spontaenous generation is impossible, well... Maybe there isn't a rational explanation for that.
UFO is not an Alien Ship, it is an Unidentified Flying Object. Many of those sightings have been U.S. and other countries new planes. The U.S. purchased a project from Canada a few years ago, it is making a UFO. The only details they gave to the public is that they are developing capable Disc Aircraft, which most people would name an Alien Craft.
That would be funny as hell if Mars, venus, or maybe gas giant held life on them. I mean, how are so many UFO's spotted? Unless they travel by wormhole, or they built bases under ground, anything outside this solar system would be hell getting to. Think abut that.
That might be because 'we' don't know yet in off what many ways there are for other lifeforms to travel or, even how they do anything for that mather. So, TheTruth2012, of little we know about so many things yet :)
Miller experiment is now showing new results. but still long way to prove that life can be born on earth itself.
those enviornments are not enough. Pressure is never a problem when achieving equilibrium. boiling temp is fine, but the hottest water is only 400 c, coldest water is 0c, coldest place is only -80c. not Enough to prove that they can survive in outer space.
DNA is the best argument actually. that's the reason I am a God acknowledging atheist.
To everyone on this board. Believe what you wanna believe. I personally could care less. I didn't make my comments because I was trying to change minds. Only to see if anyone out ther was thinking. And to those attacks on my character, intelligence and or schooling Ad Hominem attacks only point out you can't deal with the questions at hand. You Kids have fun!
351rswoodling 4 days ago
No one is saying you have to believe this stuff your just supposed to watch it and then think about it and then base conclusions on what you've seen... if that conclusion is that the info is not solid fact, that's great, but don't hop onto the comment boards and try to force us to believe what YOU think about the information presented. I don't care what you think, i care what i think, and that's the way everyone has and is going to feel forever.
Malconeous 3 months ago
life evolved here as organisms like stromatolites slowly released oxygen into the atmosphere changing it from a planet warming blanket of CO2 to a mix with 21% oxygen. It has remained that way for millenia and that is why the planets environment and the life forms on the planet are mutually beneficial.
MeghanfromWales 3 months ago
What a load of dingos Kidneys. This video is pregnant with ifs, thens, and faulty conclusions based on flawed logic.Does anyone out there have a brain that works? Or are you all wnnabe trekies.
351rswoodling 4 months ago
@351rswoodling After reading your comment I have concluded that there is no intelligent life present on Earth.
fywacia 2 months ago
@351rswoodling You have obviously never taken a university science course
cheguevaraguerilla 5 days ago
Thank you sarastarlight, this work of yours is just mind blowing.
kaotik1981 5 months ago
I searched inside Wikipedia about some exciting information told in this video , unfortunately they were wrong .
Your argument is interesting but it lacks scientific proof
mazinm2006 6 months ago
@mazinm2006 The first thing you learn when you come to university is that wikipaedia is a weak source for scientific information. I've been given this video as one of the only videos to base part of my actual course on. Do you really think a university with all it's professors and resources would be incorrect? Based on wikipaedia??
zedooncadhz 5 months ago
@zedooncadhz I am saying that some points are wrong & only heard about it in these videos . The whole job is great but there are some mistakes .
mazinm2006 5 months ago
@mazinm2006 But aren't you saying they're wrong based solely on wikipaedia? And my point was not to trust wiki as the ultimate science bible. Also if you want some answers as to where the 1st cells might have come from this is one of the latest theories wwwDOTnatureDOTcom/news/1998/021202/full/news021202-2.html
zedooncadhz 5 months ago
Comment removed
mazinm2006 5 months ago
Comment removed
mazinm2006 5 months ago
@mazinm2006 Also it does say it is throroughly referenced and these references can be found at brainmind and gives you a link to check the refernces yourself
zedooncadhz 5 months ago
@mazinm2006 thanks
mazinm2006 5 months ago
Uhm says hes a "phd" in what? astrophysics and biology? Most of his so called proof is very controversial.
MegaBEANER1000 7 months ago
watch?v=3H0RXDrfyZc is a far more plausible and sourced hypothesis
judoisoww 7 months ago
saying life came from another planet still doesn't explain how life came from non life it is just delays the answering of the question, it is possible and indeed plausible that life could come from other planets but that is not the origin of life. life still had to come from somewhere in addition to this any object that entered our solar system would gain an enormous amount of energy and if it were to enter the atmosphere that energy would convert to temp rise of 9000c nothing could survive
judoisoww 7 months ago
I watched all of these video and this guy, while smart. makes me SO ANGRY!
He keeps saying that life can't be created on life but had to come from,elsewhere, but doesn't explain where from... Primordial Soup a myth on earth, then wheres the explanation? He keeps saying this without backing himself up. He says it so certainly, with no facts behind him
I can beleive life formed elsewhere, martian metiors are proof, but what makes the soup idea anymore likely on ay other planet rather than earth?
FuzzyLogicReality 9 months ago
@FuzzyLogicReality he's saying only life can PRODUCE life not create it. As in DNA unwrapping and coding new DNA strands is life producing life. Creating life is different, personally i think that it's created due to the physical properties of atoms. I mean all you need for the beginnings of a basic cell is a phospholipid by-layer and phospholipids can be formed just because of the attractions between the atoms within it pulling each other together
zedooncadhz 5 months ago
i had an experience which can be said to be an nde and in it my body started to vibrate very fast them i found myself in darkness and suddenly i notice a light its got bigger as i got closer the light look golden white as i got closer i don't know what my body if i had one look like but i somehow could feel the warm glow of the golden light maybe that could be were we and all life came from?(000)
TheLovesoul1 11 months ago
@TheLovesoul1 or, perhaps, you are an epileptic (?)
6020e3 10 months ago
@6020e3 yeah maybe
TheLovesoul1 10 months ago
Why don't these videos discuss where the FIRST life came from? This glaring omission drove me nuts watching all 5 parts, waiting in vain for this to be addressed.I'm fine with the idea that earthly life came from space, but there had to have been a FIRST life-form somewhere out there, which could NOT have "come from life" because it was the FIRST. Either some divine intelligence created the first life, or there WAS some "organic soup" on some planet somewhere in which the first creature formed.
citizenmediaman 1 year ago
life had to come from somewhere else? alright than where did that life come from??
this is idiotic - why can't we be a product of our world we have everything we need to live here - there is water - I think where there is water and the conditions fit - it would be hard for there not to be life
stillstandin4you 1 year ago
@stillstandin4you yeah we could be a product of our enviiroment but there is no evidence that water is a natureal resource because as i have read and studied frozen water comes from the farthest regions of space and if water was present on other plants or the solar system or galaxy then life could originate from other places in the universe and so happen to arrive here but my question is were does consciousness come from and how can matter which doesn't have awareness be aware at all?(000)
TheLovesoul1 11 months ago
@stillstandin4you and also not and argument but maybe consciousness is infused with energy that converts to matter if it lowers it vibration i'd like to saggest the "living universe hypothesis" what that intales is that all matter and therefore energy since matter can be convert into energy and energy can be converted back into matter what if the mind is infused in sub-atomic energy that makes us up & what if the mind come from an the source of all energy and information.(000)
TheLovesoul1 11 months ago
@stillstandin4you and i'd also like to say that an orginism grow or forms from the inside out not outisde in so were did the information come from you can't creat information you can only generate information which is always presence in one form or another in thermodynamics it says energy cannot be created nor destroyed so there has to be a place were this energy goes when or awareness goes when it is done with its current incarnation?
TheLovesoul1 11 months ago
thank you
canadiankewldude 1 year ago
where did the life from space begin? God or life from non life, it had to begin somewhere can you explain that, the beginings of life, not just on earth but life itself from anywhere.
canadiankewldude 1 year ago
@canadiankewldude Non life is life itself thus is no such thing as non life,Life made Non life,Non life is just Life.Non is a "Parent" to something that is a live,Not dead.Dead is particles that slowly kill Life Which makes Non life.But it also kills Non life which makes the matter of Life Dissapear,Thus making it dossapear makes it Non Life.
rjniscool 1 year ago
@rjniscool And then it makes that Non life dissapear,Which makes it nothing
rjniscool 1 year ago
@rjniscool redundant redundancy is redundant, but it sounds smart and well thought out. /facepalm
nelsonml9 1 year ago
@nelsonml9 Lol thx?
rjniscool 1 year ago
It dose not matter were the life came from, the point is if the life needs to be produced by life or not?
Even in the sky, if life could be produced from no life, then it could happen in the earth too.
apspacking 1 year ago
It is very interested that most people who have no faith in God, come from western countries like Canada, America and such. No wonder for such shallow and ignorant nations to have such a narrow mind. God is everywhere! God Bless!
JosephTibor 1 year ago
@JosephTibor You are thoroughly mistaken about America. America is about as religious as it gets. Go to Europe to see truly atheistic societies.
Zeuts85 1 year ago
Comment removed
Arkanoid1212 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Life coming only from life": its circular, and even if there was an creator: by asking how a creator came into existance is asking the same question at another level. At one point it HAS to be a "spontaneus generation". However there is an increasing number of indicies suggesting this was probably not of earthly origin. And there are really better examples of fossilized microbes in meteors than the one being mentioned (a proven hoax). Still highly informative.
Arkanoid1212 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@averycleverman If the first living forms or any type of life came from the big bang how did life get there in the first place if someone can answer that question i will kneel down and say god is just another way of brainwashing man
maxphilly 1 year ago
If the first living forms or any type of life came from the big bang how did life get there in the first place if someone can answer that question i will kneel down and say god is just another way of brainwashing man
maxphilly 1 year ago
This is a very interesting video but the conclusion is very wrong. The fact that life can exist and thrive in almost any conditions is itself evidence that life can evolve anywhere. DNA can be spontaneously formed anywhere in the universe by a process called zoesynthesis. the form that it takes depends on where it forms. But the species will always evolve in such a way as to be perfectly adapted to the environment in which it is.
averycleverman 1 year ago
@averycleverman "But the species will always evolve in such a way as to be perfectly adapted to the environment in which it is." That couldn't be more wrong or could be the best evidence for mankind to be aliens. How exactly would you explain our soft skin, everything can pierce it, we need shoes to survive, we need tools to survive in the world, how would you explain that? we are not ment for this world.
banheden 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@banheden If the first living forms or any type of life came from the big bang how did life get there in the first place if someone can answer that question i will kneel down and say god is just another way of brainwashing man
maxphilly 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is a very interesting video but the conclusion is very wrong. The fact that life can exist and thrive in almost any conditions is itself evidence that life can evolve anywhere. DNA can be spontaneously formed anywhere in the universe by a process called zoesynthesis. the form that it takes depends on where it forms. But the species will always evolve in such a way as to be perfectly adapted to the environment in which it is.
averycleverman 1 year ago
1 Corinthians 3:19-20
"For the wisdom of this world is foolishness in God's sight. As it is written: "He catches the wise in their craftiness"; 20 - and again, "The Lord knows that the thoughts of the wise are futile."
8i680085 1 year ago
I don't know.... I thought the womb was pretty extreme.
StimpsonJKat 1 year ago
I don't know.... I thought the womb was pretty extreme.
StimpsonJKat 1 year ago
With God all things are possible.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth.
No one is good—except God alone.
Blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.
Jesus (Matthew 19:26, John 20:29, Mark 10:18 (Genesis 1:1))
29apr2010 1 year ago
@29apr2010
Bullshit. (Pepqo 15:38)
Pepqo1 1 year ago
@29apr2010 Except leaving evidence of four legged bees, chickens, mosquitoes, ducks, flies. Leviticus 11:20 Except killing dews livestock. Exodus 9:6, except appearing with all his almighty power. Revelation 1:8, Except create man in Gods own image but the say he is not a man. Numbers 23:19. Except stopping the earth from moving. Psalm 104.5, except let woman speak or have any kind of power. 1 Timothy 2:11, need I go on? I suggest Science has most of the answers and religion not one answer!!
stevjen1 1 year ago
If life came from other planets how the f**** did it it get on those planets !Stupid
soul3music1 1 year ago
Abiogenesis and this theory go together hand and hand.
JuniorDExchangecore 1 year ago
i like the videos except it pisses me off because have the stuff in here is just reused in your videos i cant tell you how many times ive heard life came from the stars
jsmithmilitary 1 year ago
google Doe's Account, its mindblowing
Phatcass 1 year ago
science cant explain everything but ther is a scientific explanation for everything
DjBodie 1 year ago
hmzcant seem to find a guy who isnt a coward
TeReffleese32 1 year ago
Amazing video!!
We must have a universal symmetry made out of nothing more than radiant energy and a universal process of symmetry breaking. That would make us the broken symmetry of our own evolutionary path.
nickharvey7 1 year ago
Sure we can create life! babies.... and screw scientific explanation. You believe what you want to believe, some think " BIG BANG" and what caused the big bang? and what caused that? makes me wonder.
teenfawn11 2 years ago
Just because we don't understand something does int make Jesus real.
00Alderamin 2 years ago
God banged someone? :)
nidzaPFC 1 year ago
Nice humor. And right alderamin, but everyone is either " it was god or.... science.. but shit, believe watever :D im not telling you what to believe. :)
teenfawn11 1 year ago
Well God from the Bible didnt create universe, i am sure about that(he has small penis, and he wants everyone to worship him, fuckin ego-maniac) The name BIG BANG was always funny to me, Maybe God organized universe's largest orgy and got premature ejaculation in one of the black (ass) Holes. Then black holes gave birth to Earth and other planets/stars... thats what happens when you have sex, without using
protection.
nidzaPFC 1 year ago
@nidzaPFC In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. I tell you that men will have to give account on the day of judgment for every careless word they have spoken. Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment (Matthew 12:31, 36, Genesis 1:1, Hebrews 9:27).
29apr2010 1 year ago
god is real
LordMissingnogan 2 years ago
how was life creatd when it is impossible to create somthing out of nothing ?Do not brang God in to this i want to hear the scientific explanation.
tearofaroase 2 years ago
The leading current theory is based on the fact that if you put liquids and gases corresponding to the earth's atmosphere and ocean composition ~4 billion years ago and expose them to electric current and heat you will observe the formation of a variety of organic molecules such as amino acids. The origin of life would be a simple chemical reaction leading to the first self replicating molecules.
MrMalavon 2 years ago
Put up or shut up. Build me a single reproducing living cell from the available amino acids. With the combined intelligence of past and present no one has come close to creating life. If with all this intelligence we can't create life, how is life going to evolve into existence given ANY number of years?
funnzie 2 years ago
Prove to me the exictence of god. Bet you can't do that either.
Paligelso 2 years ago
@Paligelso Prove to me that God doesn't exist. Bet you can't do that can you? Lol, the ignorance of a narrow mind:))
JosephTibor 1 year ago
Thanks for sharing your point of view , is very interesting .
blinkangels44 2 years ago
hmm... so where did life from other planets, meteorites, etc come from? doesn't that still leave us at square one? Where did life originate from?
interesting theory though.
Mithrand87 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The Universe and Life originated from the hand of God, our creator.
creamone 2 years ago
ALLAH ALMIGHTY is the creator of the whole universe.
imrankhan787 2 years ago
ya mum cunt.
dobokjoe 2 years ago
your mother taught you that didn't she when you were giving her orgasm. ha ha ha. MOFO.
imrankhan787 2 years ago
If life came to earth from other planets, how did it start on those planets?
Either abiogenesis occurred on earth, or -you're saying it had to occur somewhere else. Or did "god" do it?
gwcstudio 2 years ago
Learning to love yourself is the first step !
Self programming !
Beleive !
Peace !
weirdiz 2 years ago
What is the music plz ?
DrowSHeart 2 years ago
for fuck sake how many times does this cunt wanna say life came from the stars - 5/10 way to repeatitive!!!!!!!!!!!!!
uckfaouyaagotfa 2 years ago
It is made for americans, if you don't repeat it enough, they will not understand
Sacrist211 2 years ago
i ask this question how did life start
or
does the statment on your channel
"life is an intrinsic part of the universe"
answer that for me
this is my one point of contention with all the videos and theories ive seen from your channel
while i can accept that as the answer youd give
i cant discount the possiblity that my answer has yet to be found
after all arent we all like people standing on a shore trying guess at whats over the horizon
using only the best knowledge we currently have
SGFanFiction 2 years ago
how is it more reasonable to assume life arrived on earth from other planets? thats just pushing the question back one step to where did the life that arrived here originate from.
personaly i think life on this planet is a mixture of what has originated here and what formed here on its own.
there is one point i must make known though, DNA strands are capable of randomly puting themselves together so DNA can come from sonething other than DNA.... base chemicals.
QCreyton 2 years ago
aline life
antiiNoob 2 years ago
God was not crowned or made....that is what makes God, God. He is the Author of everything in existense. I am humbled and priviledged to live in the most astonishing, complex, beautiful, intelligent, inspiring, precise and amazing universe. Praise be to the Maker of all!
dimafed 2 years ago
I agree
lennyfloss 2 years ago
And who made God? I humbly ask?
omarecer 2 years ago
I stand by what I wrote 1 month ago. The very question you ask has a contradiction all in itself. If God is the Author and Maker of EVERYTHING that is in existense (as much as our limited minds comprehend that, and some arrogantly refuse it) then God therefore CANNOT be a created or appointed being. He then must be eternal, all-knowing and independent of anything.
dimafed 2 years ago
Well written!!
Thanks!!
afdhalatifftan92 2 years ago
god what god your crazy
CarDoseS 2 years ago
best question ever!
crazyflipcarlo 2 years ago
God does not exist
Sacrist211 2 years ago
PROVE IT. DUMB ASS.
imrankhan787 2 years ago
Na, it might shatter your illusions and make you cry like a little baby.
You keep beliving in "god" and be happy, go fight a jew instead as they apparently killed jesus.
Sacrist211 2 years ago
God?
CarDoseS 2 years ago
God is Neanderthalers
gwap360 2 years ago
Ok where did the life from those planets come from?
and what about the life that went to those planets.
Its like a never ending chains of what ifs.
science can't explain everything.
CrazyRsQuester 2 years ago
even if life did arive here from other planets, where did their life come from, and their's?, and their's? Eventually, there would have been something from nothing, and that is immpossible, so God DOES exist, he DID start life
stormpok 2 years ago
How do we exist to began with? God? really? Because how did god exist to begIn with? The big bang? How was there even a start to make the big bang? Just thinking about the very beginning makes my head hurt...
Maybe we don't exist...but we do exist...but we don't? Hmmmmmmm....
ComprimisedXInsanity 2 years ago
And this still doesn't address the real question of abiogenesis. While life, or it's precursors may have indeed arisen elsewhere in the solar system (mars most likely) and been transferred here by whatever means, the real question is: how did it start? We've got a much better idea thanks to the HHMI Szostak lab as well as from other researchers. Due to the nature of organic/biochemistry life may be ubiquitous where ever a planet is stable enough with the basic conditions.
magick205 2 years ago
Life on Earth Came From Other Planets: A comprehensive, thoroughly referenced scientific article, & additional chapters detailing the evidence in support of this theory, can be viewed and read for free, at the BrainMind website. Just go to the link located to the above right of this page.
Dr. Joseph's book: "Life on Earth Came From Other Planets: Origins, Evolution, Metamorphosis, Extinction," will be published this summer, and can be purchased from Amazon and the BrainMind website.
Sarastarlight 2 years ago
Where did the life from other planets come from? WHERE DID THE UNIVERSE COME FROM?
lennyfloss 2 years ago
@Sarastarlight Life comes from the laws of physics. Some things R attracted 2 each other, & others repel. Natural selection over millions of years creates life under some conditions, & not others. It is the result of natural forces. It's not complicated. U R just a cult nutter who invents 'eternal life' as your object of idolatry. Grow a brain man.
The Origin of Life - Abiogenesis - Dr. Jack Szostak
watch?v=U6QYDdgP9eg
Deathrape2001 1 year ago
@Sarastarlight I'm not against Panspermia, but ... let's see 1) Organic Soup is based on Carbon Chemistry, Carb. Chains are what forms the basic building blocks for life 2) Possibly. 3) Correct 4) Indeed 5) Far Fetched, no proof at all. 6,7) The Fossils finding is very controversial.8) Indeed, but it was a case of contamination, the microbe was identified as a common Streptococcus bacteria. 9) True, and there's plenty of proof. 10, 11) Applies to microscopic life only, not animals or plants.
esteban2106 8 months ago
"The only rational intelligent explanation?!? If only life can produce life, than the first creature to appear on earth came from other planets."
I guess it's quite possible that life came from space...however life in space came from where? Also, there is lot of other possible "rational intelligent explanation"...btw no one will ever have the certainty on how life originated, not even Dr Joseph!
Beutse1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
.
Christians of this website, the judgement day have started already, please I urge you to depart from all form of unchristian conduct lest you be found not worthy to enter the kingdom of God. Please do not label my activity spam, I did not do it for that purpose.
.
conceil8 2 years ago
Seems to make sense, i wonder where , was there a special planet where life first evolved ? Before it was shot into space, trying to enhabbit other planets.
flubno 2 years ago
'Where' is less of a question than 'how' did DNA first form...that is the one thing this this video fails to explain, however if this theory is true, then researching DNA origin would be near impossible since it originated on another planet.
kaplow03 2 years ago
That is why they propose that life would come from space. If they can avoid having us look into how DNA formed, they can claim it came from a god.
This video lost me when he mentioned cyanobacteria in his list, but failed to make the connection that blue-green algae are cyanobacteria. This is when I knew what he had to say was not from someone firing on all cylinders. While pan-spermia is a neat idea, we need to see what earthly possibilities can happen first.
xlanciferionx 2 years ago
the narrator sounds like Nicholas Cage... is the narrator Nicholas Cage? (oh and it is possible that there is life on one of the billions upon trillions of planets in the universe if there is life on one of them)
katboe 2 years ago
you may have come from a fish or ape, not I ! and you use the word GOD to much, thats something you worship right?, dont you think thats really silly and a stone age way of thinking?
SMKYYY 2 years ago
Its sad when human erogence allows one to teach theory as fact.
hottycheri 2 years ago
So, hottypotty, does this mean you are going to cry?
YourThoughtPolice 2 years ago
I don't even know what you're talking about, but you clearly don't know what a theory is.
mwolfson86 2 years ago
I am not trying to be rude but what does the word erogence mean? I couldn't find a definition for it. Could you mean arrogance?
misshitokiri 2 years ago
!-IVY-! This is Sonny and this is proof i watched this video!!!
sonnytrujillo 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jesus is our creater. The KING of KINGS.
BubbleYum77 2 years ago
Comment removed
sonnytrujillo 2 years ago
How can you be sure? answer that and dont say someone told you or a book, i know he did great deeds of kindness but i just cant believe that.
7xXAfflictionXx7 2 years ago
But who crowned/created him?
Edward256 2 years ago
Thy Oracles of Course
NEWLOVE559 2 years ago
if there was life on other planets the odds of intelligience must be slim,as all life that has ever evolved on the earth only us has evolved to a technilogical stage.also you have to consider time,the chance that two intelligences had lived at the same time with the means of contact are miniscule,but we can always HOPE
hanghang71 2 years ago
we humans need to explain everything with regards to our life,origin,its purpose and so on.....but i believe and i would like to say i know for a fact(99.99)% that there is simply no reason for our existance.
life forms exist when suitable conditions for life exist!
freeballs7 2 years ago
This is one theory. Who knows, it could be entirely accurat but just because something is possible doesn't mean its for sure and assuming so is irrational. This video jumps from one conclusion to another to another as if jumping to conclusions is scientific.
Sendamagicmoment 2 years ago
Why is it so difficult to believe we're just a product of energy? Do humans need to feel special?
abdula31 2 years ago
our ancestors probably didn't come from the stars, it's more assumable life appeared here due to conditions. Wich is interesting, because it means there's life everywhere.
abdula31 2 years ago
so far i see no evolution only adaptation & change we are still as empty in majority when it comes to morals, are views on creation & spiritual believes, we are also killing are selves other animal life & the planet how is that better then past civilizations which had better connections with nature & the universe we are simply changing & adapting to are changing environment
zeurnock 3 years ago
well said
yourboycal 2 years ago
I cant belive some people reject evolution anyway.
Thoses dangerous persons should be punished.
ManOWar2Red 3 years ago
theres a book coming out in 3 years time its about everthing thats got to do wit life, i no the writer and she's been writing that book for over 10 years now.
Kxxkxx 3 years ago
why are we here???
very simple.........no explanation.
and when I say "no explanation" it simply means there is no reason for it.
Had the world listened to somebody who said this thousands of years ago...we probably wouldnt have had any fairytale religions.
freeballs7 3 years ago
Religions...the most dangerous disease of humanity.
ManOWar2Red 3 years ago
religions would still exist if people were to come up with a conclusion such as this, even more so if the conclusion came around in the middle age. Religions will always exist until everything is explained and even you do not know the secrets of the universe so who are you to judge besides it's usually not the religion that's bad, it's the idiots that pervert the message of the religion to fit their own needs and means.
grimapocalypse2 3 years ago
I dont think so....religions dont need to exist and the only reason religions exist is coz the wealth of any nation is concentrated in the hands of a few and these hoes buld organizations(religions)to maintain their power over the general population.
freeballs7 2 years ago
people always corrupt a message. It wouldnt matter how innocent or divine it may be. It would somehow be corrupted by man. Besides mankind is always searching for a way to explain the universe around him/her. Until the species is dead religion will exist. How about a question? Do you believe in spirituality?
grimapocalypse2 2 years ago
hey grimapocalypse2 sorry for the delay in answering ur question......the answer to ur question if I believed in spirituality....yes I do but it just another human invention for survival which means it is UNNECESSARY!
freeballs7 2 years ago
thanx sarastarlight for posting!
freeballs7 3 years ago
"since only life can produce life, then the firt creatures to appear on earth came from other planets."
what a crock of shit...they will let anyone make a documentary these days.
NotReallyAwake 3 years ago
*LOAD OF CRAP, DONT WATCH*
after the first minute the bullshit of a video is all ready circle reasoning and has no evidence to suport its theroys, "Other then the hand of God the only rational inteligent explanation for earthly life is life arived here from other planets" what a narrow minded sack of shit if i ever heard it, 2:05-2:20 yes they can surive in space but if they are only half a micrometer in diamter how will they enter the earths atmosphere an surive it? *LOAD OF CRAP, DONT WATCH*
councilorM 3 years ago
hahahha, load of crap--that's your breath, moron. Ooooh, poor councishit, I think he's going to cray. Boo hooo... don't watch, please don't watch, or or or, I'll cry!
Hahhhahha. what a moron. That load of crap is your brain, hahhhahhaaa
MarsIsCalling 3 years ago
You are a genius councilorM. Nothing could survive entering our atmosphere. Even if these rocks somehow made it to Earth before the atmosphere formed they would have been destroyed on impact or in the early molten Earth. I am too lazy to comment further on this crazy stuff. As a joke this is funny as hell.
LunaticKnight 3 years ago
Question... if life comes only from life and DNA only from DNA, then where did the first DNA come from?
Also, you insist that where there's water there's life -- but can you explain why this is so?
reinux 3 years ago
If you enjoy our videos better download your copy now. The Google Gestapo has repeatedly threatened to close this account and we suspect they may act on their threats very soon. So, if you like this video, better make your copy now.
Sarastarlight 3 years ago
Just asking.., could life such as humans come from a unicellular organism?
mikeandamina 3 years ago
Absolutely.
kimera7790 3 years ago
Ok thanks.
mikeandamina 3 years ago
if life came from other planets where did the life on other planets come from? bet u cant answer that.
JonUfb 3 years ago
evolution baby. a genetic mutation from chemicals combining
kimera7790 3 years ago
In the first video the narrator states over and over that 'the notion of non-living material spawning life is ridiculous and magical thinking' is quite annoying, when you're claiming that bacteria of unknown origin riding into a ball of lava from outer-space is more viable.
Daealis 3 years ago
This whole series is a case of "I can't imagine, therefore it did not happen". The primordial soup might not be the correct answer for abiogenesis, but there is no more evidence for exogenesis. And in any case, these have nothing to do with evolution, since evolution only deals with life after it has begun, from the second generation up.
Although videos contain interesting ideas, they are heavily biased with little evidence. And if the seeds-of-life -hypothese is correct, how did those pop up?
Daealis 3 years ago
haha!! spirulina's from space..
slappy480ic3f4 3 years ago
"organic soup is a myth, life came from organic material from outer space" ... then where did the organic material from outer space come from?... and dont say "from another meteorite"!!! "DNA only comes from DNA" is not a proven statement. we dont know where it came from.
666stallion666 3 years ago
which do you think sound the best? the organic soup theory or this? i must say this theory cause the universe now is about 13,7 billion years old and who knows if not the big bang caused mutatuions or carbon atoms to form molecules later known as bacteria? A pretty steady fact is that the earths water came from meteors throughout the period 3,8 to 4,6 billion years ago, maybe bacterias came with those meteors and by shure they survived the impact. If species can live with a pressure of 9000
gpnok91 2 years ago
serious thought was put into this. but the deeper into the abyss you delve the darker it gets i.e. you're looking so deeply that you can no longer see clearly. these topics are fathomless and beliefs grow in multi-directions. all speculation and you have no really legitimate argument. however i'm going to watch more out of curiousity and will courteously stand corrected. In saying that.. this is the perfect example of freedom of speech. i'm not condemning i only wish to enrich my mind.
666stallion666 3 years ago
pounds per square centimeter then its pretty relevant. and it doesnt mean that the bacterias comming from meteors landed and stayed at the earths surface getting bombarded with new meteors. they could easily float in under some crack clearing its exposure of solar radiation, heat and volcanoes...
excuse my bad english ^^
gpnok91 2 years ago
very interesting. so there's the differentiating opinions of science and religion... what's this? religion or science??? scientology?? wtf is all this. your just doing exactly what religion has done all along. except you're concocting it with science. speculative, selective information picking and bullshit derivations and hypothesis. organic soup?? lol.. atoms are present (in my opinion they were created.. by whom or what i dont know) atoms form molecules.. the building blocks of cells.
666stallion666 3 years ago
Despite any disagreements, thank you for posting these compelling videos and thank you for responding!
stevensw 3 years ago
ask your self this question the universe is big why would god make a big universe if we are the only kind of life i think there are more life not just us maybe more
hotdakota300 3 years ago
I do not doubt it, in fact it is my firm belief there exists other life in the universe. But, it is still conceivable to me that we may be alone in the galaxy wrt intelligent life, or galactic quadrant. I am not prepared to say how common simple life may be.
Given what would seem to be a relatively small window in geologic time between societies first forming and interstellar space travel however, we likely would have been visited by now by any "neighbors", given how appetizing Earth must be.
stevensw 3 years ago
Indeed hotdakota300, even 1 microbe alive or not, came from an extraterrestrial oregon. Proves 100% beyond a shadow of a doubt, there is abundance of life throughout our universe. The only question I have now is. Is there intelligent life out there? If so, then what about other dimensions?
xerox165 3 years ago
It is true that life is incredibly resilient in surviving extreme environments, but it too has limits. This is why the only known life is on planet Earth. Even so, there are places on planet earth, even on the surface, that have been found to be barren of life. Such as the Atacama Desert. It still has limits, and these limits are the norm in the universe, not the exception.
stevensw 3 years ago
There is a continuous ladder bridging the most complex, inorganic compounds and the most complex living things. From acids/proteins, viruses, to humans. Inorganic compounds are the building blocks to "life". A human and a block of wood are both made out of atoms. At the atomic level, they are no different. They are all Hydrogen, Carbon, Oxygen atoms, etc. I mean, "life" in itself is a mythical term invented to describe the most complex chemical interactions. It's all a point of view.
stevensw 3 years ago
Stevensw, your argument is logical and deserving of serious discussion and debate and leads to many other extremely interesting questions and issues, e.g. such as life related to consciousness, the nature of "death." In the original unedited version of my video, "The Evolution of Life on Other Planets" I explored the issues you've raised, but alas, the film was 2 hours in length and had to be severely cut.
DrRJoseph 3 years ago
Life coming only from life is obviously completely untrue, if this argument is true then where did the first life come from? Your argument suggests there has always been life. I doubt that strongly, especially since it so turns out that life could be such an exceptionally rare phenomenon that we may very well may be alone probably not in the universe, but certainly may be on this galaxy. Then again maybe not. But there aren't shards of "life" flying all around space.
stevensw 3 years ago
stevensw, your argument in this posting is merely opinion and is refuted by the evidence. The facts are: only life can produce life. There is no evidence proving otherwise. Further in another post, you claim viruses are alive, which is not a view accepted by the majority of experts in this area. Third, your argument in this post conflicts with your statement: "A human and a block of wood are both made out of atoms. At the atomic level, they are no different...." etc.
DrRJoseph 3 years ago
Logically, it has to be right. Unless you can prove life existed before the big bang, your argument simply cannot be true. The first life had to come from somewhere non-living. Whether it's straight from inorganic matter, energy, or the void (simply came into being).
I never claimed viruses to be life. I never claimed they weren't. In fact, I do not believe in the term "life" by definition. I like to think of it more an urban term, to describe the most complex chemical reactions.
stevensw 3 years ago
If that imaginary defining line arbitrarily chosen right above viruses, then so be it.
I'm apologize for not making myself clear.
stevensw 3 years ago
Regarding some of your videos in general, I think they are well done and I respect your opinions, and life certainly may not have originated on this planet. But you have some huge logical holes in your arguments.
As you so strongly point out, life is infinitely complex. BUT, it is also infinitely simple. Some consider the simplest forms of life to be viruses. Your arguments do in no way refute the possibility life originated from inorganic matter.
stevensw 3 years ago
stevensw, your are 100% right when you state my videos do not "refute the possibility life originated from inorganic matter." What they have refuted (or nearly refuted) is the ridiculous notion that life ON EARTH originated from inorganic matter (e.g. organic soup). As detailed in my just released video, "Evolution of Life on Other Planets" evidence based on DNA, the fossil record, and thus evolutionary metamorphosis demonstrates that life on Earth came from other planets.
DrRJoseph 3 years ago
That is certainly possible, life may have come from elsewhere, perhaps even implanted by aliens. But I wouldn't refute it may have originated here either. I don't think we have close to the technological capacity to disprove this, and I think it's a very valid, if not the most valid argument.
If there is no question that the first life originated from non-life, then logically it must be possible that life on Earth originated from non-life.
stevensw 3 years ago
That may explain how life arrived on earth, but that still doesn't explain where that spacelife came from, and since spontaenous generation is impossible, well... Maybe there isn't a rational explanation for that.
Rivus1111 3 years ago
UFO is not an Alien Ship, it is an Unidentified Flying Object. Many of those sightings have been U.S. and other countries new planes. The U.S. purchased a project from Canada a few years ago, it is making a UFO. The only details they gave to the public is that they are developing capable Disc Aircraft, which most people would name an Alien Craft.
jonah232 3 years ago
That would be funny as hell if Mars, venus, or maybe gas giant held life on them. I mean, how are so many UFO's spotted? Unless they travel by wormhole, or they built bases under ground, anything outside this solar system would be hell getting to. Think abut that.
TheTruth2012 3 years ago
That might be because 'we' don't know yet in off what many ways there are for other lifeforms to travel or, even how they do anything for that mather. So, TheTruth2012, of little we know about so many things yet :)
peace
michelb08 3 years ago
Miller experiment is now showing new results. but still long way to prove that life can be born on earth itself.
those enviornments are not enough. Pressure is never a problem when achieving equilibrium. boiling temp is fine, but the hottest water is only 400 c, coldest water is 0c, coldest place is only -80c. not Enough to prove that they can survive in outer space.
DNA is the best argument actually. that's the reason I am a God acknowledging atheist.
moxinghbian 3 years ago