How can you judge him as having no honor. ? He is laying out a plan for our future generations to restore honor to America. If you cant understand that I feel sorry for you. Because he has great Honor. Walk in his shoes. You may end up a HERO too.
most Tea Party members don't even know what they are fighting for bcuz people like glen beck hide the REAL problem from them...glen beck is phony for not calling out the real problem which is the federal reserve/world banksters/central banks/rothchild and rockefeller families... but instead the "elite" who own the media tell folks like beck to divide us on racism and other bullshit that dont matter...WE THE PEOPLE MUST WAKE UP THIS IS A TAKEOVER BY THE BANKSTERS WHO GOT THE 37 TRILLION DOLLARS!!
@DUBTEXENTERTAINMENT I have to agree with you about the banks, they want us divided and focused on hate for each other when really we should all stand together against banks owning the world. You know what's going on, I can see it too. The banksters are evil and dangerous and far too powerful.
Some advice: Look up "McCarthyism". Now run a google search for "Glenn Beck Lies". It's time for all Americans to recognize that a man with no honor cannot restore honor. Only you can by tuning him out and thinking for yourselves.
Please reconsider going to the Lincoln Memorial on Aug. 28. This day is reserved for the people who fought and died for the civil rights movement: Union workers and civil rights workers.
Your the best Beck! Thank you for what you do,and thank god for putting you out there everyday to speak for the countless. We will walk with you on 8/28,and we will make a difference.
No, this has everything to do with who you are Glenn, a unscrupulous ego-maniac with no qualms about exploiting the stupidity of people to earn a buck. And what's up with that sick music?
God bless Glenn and the USA... I hope they pass the Unemployment extensions next week for the unemployed. The world is watching DC how they treat the unemployed etc... or sign an Executive Order that help them.
It's about who are we, yes, but its also what have we allowed to happen to our great nation. We've allowed the ignorant & indoctrinated to elect an America-hating subverter into the Presidency of all things.
And we've allowed our public schools to become anti-American indoctrination centers for Marxist philosophy.
And we've allowed Sec-Progs to engrain their propaganda into our minds without challenge or analysis. Many of our long-held beliefs are simply lies, meant to destroy this culture.
The problem with most libertarians is that they're almost as fractured as the tea parties. It's the problem with democracy among strong and free-willed people: dissent. They often can't agree and won't compromise (which is a quality in everyplace but politica).
1. A group can have a single leader and still be fractured, you moron. The Tea Party is a movement based on a few principles, it's not a political party, it's composed of a diverse group of people.
2. Dissent and differing opinions don't exist in politics?
@NoGuff My sweet deity, do you need a massage? A percoset? Did your dog pee on the carpet? Why the hostility? Be cool.
I was replying to Trollmaster's reference to Libertarians needing to become the big dog to take on the political machine (perhaps I should have tagged him, ne?). I referenced Tea Parties because I hear the argument about Tea Parties needing to coagulate and do the same. I have the utmost respect for both sets of people, though I align myself officially with neither...
It's not about the differing ideas in the grand scheme of political agendas. It's a game of scratching each other's backs and getting as much as you can out of everyone else so you can keep getting re-elected. It's about forming ranks and gathering a larger army to not dissent too far from the present power's agenda.
What makes Libertarians and Tea Partiers so special is that they don't play that bullshit, for the most part. It's a beautiful thing. :)
The Libertarians are a political party. You can't compare the tea parties with a political party. The tea parties focus on different areas but one thing we all agree on; this destruction of America's founding principles must be stopped....... and reversed.
@qpwillie Most of the Libertarians that I've encountered (and Tea Partiers, for that matter) are more than just couch coaches with politics. They're informed citizens with deep, deep rooted ideas and ideals. My problem with trying to promote either as legitimate third parties is the thing that makes them so great: No strong or central leadership. No one person or small cadre of folks really, truly have taken control. For both groups it is their greatest strength and biggest exploitable weakness.
Not to be argumentative but I have to mention again that the tea party movement has no desire to become a third party. At this time, a third party is not the solution. The two controlling parties are too deeply rooted for us to try to defeat either of them. Sadly, the best hope for making any headway is carefully chosen members of the Republican party. As far as I can see, we have to take it one step at a time. (-;
@qpwillie Since the GOP can't name one thing they did to change their ways from the party that was rejected by America in 2006 and 2008, by voting Republican it's just the same as saying that you're content with the high level of corruption, incompetence and failure that the GOP is known for. Our founding fathers would never be content with such a proven shitty option like you are. You should be ashamed of yourself.
They already blew it and we the people rejected them for good reason.
@qpwillie I know that there are partisan GOP hacks out there that would love to try to make the argument that people regret voting the GOP out of power, but there's not a single source to back up this claim. If anything more people are fed up with both parties.
And the fact you can't name a single thing the GOP has done to change their corrupt and incompetent ways, just proves my point even further.
I never said there wasn't corruption in both parties. However, ALL the polls are not taken by "GOP hacks".
The fact is, one party has been completely taken over by a bunch of socialists who are intent on destroying everything this country was founded upon and people are waking up to it. Too bad you can't.
@qpwillie We hear the same old "the commies are taking over" crap every time there's a Democratic president.
You should have known that competent, respected, and trustworthy GOP leadership would have been the best defense of the evil socialist menace you're so afraid of.
Until you reform the GOP from within, and assure Americans that we won't see a return to the failed Bush era, you will continue to be a tool for corrupt, and incompetent leadership.
@Trollmaster21 Its not just a democrat dude. The progressives have almost completely eaten up the democratic party, very few more centered dems exist. Unfortunately, progressivism exists in the GOP too (Bush and McCain). I never thought I would say this, but right now we need to be more like Britain, who is proposing massive government spending cuts and lowering many taxes (and increase in other taxes to get the liberal vote). Europe is waking up, why cant we?
@31guitar And I wouldn't call waging an undeclared pre-emptive war based on information that was proven to be false progressive.
And thanks for confirming that Rush, Hannity, O'Reiley, and so many other right wingers are big time fools as they were duped into defending the progressive GW Bush countless times. You confirmed their opinions are shit and not worth listening to.
@Trollmaster21 How are you even about to complain about progressives when we have a bunch of them in the white house that you seem to support? Btw, Saddam did have WMD's, again, wake up
@31guitar You're the one in a coma. We didn't invade Iraq because Saddam once had WMD some time ago, we were told he currently had them, and we were told wrong.
Finding 1000 more ways to say you were right to be wrong about Iraq will never change the fact you were wrong.
And your kind were even far more wrong to attack the patriotism of those that questioned Bush and invading Iraq.
@Trollmaster21 I attacked people for questioning Bush? No, Im just correcting your false information. CIA, Russia, Great Britain, NATO, Israel, Jordan, the king of Egypt all confirmed Saddam had WMD's. former Iraqi general Georges Sadas published a book called Saddam's Secrets, where he says he knows where the weapons went, the plane they were on, etc.
@31guitar Except for the fact there was no WMD. Hence you found 2 ways now to say that you were right to be wrong. And it still doesn't change the fact you were wrong.
If you're now babbling about a conspiracy theory about how the WMD were moved out of Iraq and still out there, you're just making a claim to some other bullshit you can't prove, instead of just doing the right thing and simply admit you were wrong.
@Trollmaster21 Ok, lets ignore the fact that Saddam had plans on what to do with the WMD's during inspections or an invasion. Lets ignore that because apparently according to you who has no evidence, he did not have them. Cuz u were there right? Even though my evidence comes from people who were there or at least close. My dad has a friend who is a general. You would not believe the kinds of plans the terrorists had, one of the plans was to bomb the mall of America, would u want that to happen?
@31guitar You're made up evidence is a result of you in major denial and a lack of character in willing to admit you were wrong.
The fact remains that no WMD were found since the invasion. That fact means everything and some conspiracy theory based on what other people have said means nothing.
And if you were right (which you're not) then that means Bush was a bigger failure than we all thought. After all those lives and dollars spent and these WMD are still out there? EPIC FAIL!!!
@Trollmaster21 What I find funny is that you think that Bush had anything to do with it. the joint chiefs of staff make all those decisions, not Bush. What I find funny is that you are so stupid you wont accept reality and you claim im making things up. You know, whatever. Im not gonna argue with someone who wants to live in a fairy tale land
@Trollmaster21 Hes not responsible for going into war so I have low expectations of my leaders? Where do you get that fucking idea? Iraq was not at all a total waste, we took out a dictator who planned to kill millions. I cant believe your against progressives but not Obama, maybe its just progressive republicans. Come talk to me when you decide to wake up and drop your partisan crap
@Trollmaster21 Well, see unlike you, I can think for myself. Just because I say Bush didn't get us into war doesn't at all mean I have low expectations. The WMD's are probably still out there, probably another muslim nation (Iran possibly). I realize this totally contradicts your fairytale land so you sit there and call it a conspiracy (it really isn't). I also love you haven't given one piece of evidence, its the typical, "Im right and your wrong, end of story" from you
"Just because I say Bush didn't get us into war doesn't at all mean I have low expectations."
Which is the same thing as saying that I'm not homophobic, I just hate gay people.
There were no WMD's found. I was right to question their existence, you were wrong to fall for propaganda. You're even more wrong to insist that you were right to be wrong because someone else was wrong too.
@Trollmaster21 No its not the same at all. You're a complete MORON. I dont think I've ever argued with someone as stupid and hard-headed as you. I laughed when I first read your post. Is this a joke? You must be kidding right? I dont think anybody can be this dumb
@31guitar I bet you argued with your 1st grade teacher when she told you 2+2=4, and she got sick of explaining it 1000 times and put you in remedial math and you're still there right now.
Saying the US Generals are the reason we went to war in Iraq and not Bush, (especially after reading the PNAC's agenda, a group who ended up having many of it's members in the Bush admin) proves you have low expectations of your leader. By denying it over and over just makes you look worse.
@31guitar Evidence of what that someone doesn't have something? It's impossible to prove a negative. Did you flunk 3rd grade science?
The best thing to confirm if this threat was real would have been letting the UN inspectors do their jobs, to avoid war, death, and running up the US credit card. You can show your ignorance yet again by denying that the Bush admin was the reason why the inspectors withdrew.
@31guitar Oh and by defending this needless war non stop, you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt you're a fake conservative. As a real conservative at the time of this war would have asked for a tax hike to pay for this war instead of committing generational theft, and all the other stuff the GOP is now only pretending to care about.
I got many friends that are real conservatives and you're nothing like them. They're not shills for the hyper partisan GOP like you are.
@Trollmaster21 Its ok little boy, I realize you have no concept of reality. Im sure there are some good mental institutions in this country. You should try getting into one
@31guitar You should try to listen to reality instead of ignoring it.
You're a Neocon shill, and a mouthpiece for a return to the status quo of GOP incompetence, corruption, and failed leadership. There's commies living in America that are far more loyal and patriotic to the US than you and your kind are. 1000 more of your stupid insults will do nothing to change that.
@loonmaniac No actually, if u ask any high ranking general in the army, they will tell you these major decisions are made by the Join Chiefs of Staff based on confidential intel that they obviously aren't going to release to the public for national security reasons. So no im not a moron nor do I have a medical condition, Im just a little more informed than you
@31guitar Ahhh, that "confidential intel" that turned out to be a pack of lies, and then Bush and Cheney and that war criminal Rumsfeld were so surprised when an insurgency and sectarian violence kicked up. Good times, good times....
@loonmaniac What was a lie? That no WMD's were found? Im sure thats true, but that doesn't mean he didn't have them. Quick question... If something is confidential and not released to the public, how do you know its a lie? Unless your a top government agent or something (which I doubt)
@31guitar And the more you justify the bullshit Iraq war, the more you prove you're a bogus conservative. The war was waged by running up the national debt.
As any real conservative for that war, would have made sure it's being paid for.
@Trollmaster21 Ik its the truth because my dad was told this by a high ranking general. Unless you heard otherwise from a top military official, im going with my source over your lack of any evidence whatsoever. Please keep babbling on like an idiot, it amuses me so much
@31guitar The truth is no WMD were found, so your sources got it wrong.
You're just really saying "I was right to be wrong, because that's what the 'experts' told me." Instead of thinking for yourself. Your expert sources got it 100% wrong.
So keep pissing your pants about the WMD that never existed at the time of the Iraq invasion, and keep confirming you're a fool and a fake conservative.
@Trollmaster21 Do you have a mental disorder? Its been proven that he had plans on what to do with the WMD's if their was an inspection or invasion. Just because we didn't see the weapons doesn't mean he didn't have them
@31guitar So how much longer will it be until you admit that these WMD never existed and that GW Bush was dead wrong when he said "Saddam has WMD"? (the ones Bush claimed Saddam had before the invasion) 1 year? 5 years? Will you think that Saddam's WMD's are still out there in hiding 50 to 100 years from now? How many more years will you cling to this theory until you admit you were wrong?
@31guitar My dad's cousin's girlfriend has a brother who's a janitor at NASA and he told me that Americans have been colonizing the moon for 25 years now so it must be true according to your warped views.
And in truth, I know many people who say they're conservative and they're nothing like you. In fact you give them an awful name.
@31guitar If something is confidential and not released to the public, how do you know its the truth?
Governments deceived their own people since the beginning of civilization. You're a fool to site your source is classified information as proof. You're a bigger fool by denying that you just admitted that you have blind trust in your government.
Oh and most Americans now believe the war is a bad idea, so you also don't speak for the American people either.
@Trollmaster21 My source is a high ranking general in the US army and a historian. Whats yours? Its funny you libs hate that Bush got us into Iraq but don't say a word when Obama goes back on his promise and has yet to pull troops out of Iraq
@31guitar Well your source was wrong because no WMD's were found. To cling to a conspiracy theory that they're still out there somewhere only proves you're as loony as the birthers or 9/11 truthers.
And admitting you're not a conservative is the first real thing you said so far.
And Obama has been a huge letdown and I welcome a Democrat challenger against him in the 2012 primaries, since the GOP won't run anyone worthwhile.
@Trollmaster21 That last sentence was probably the first real thing you've said. I would vote for a moderate democrat over another progressive republican like McCain or Bush.
So because no WMD's were found, that means they weren't there? Scientists didn't think there was water on the moon, yet traces of water were found on the moon not too long ago. So far, I've provided evidence and sources, you haven't. So my arguement stands, and yours doesn't.
@31guitar Except the fact remains that these WMD were not found. That's a hole in your logic that you can drive a battleship through.
Your sources got it wrong, and instead of you doing the honorable thing and admit you were wrong, you make up a chain of cheap excuses, and piss on the graves of all those that died in Iraq due to this needless invasion.
And the American people are not on your side, as most now believe the Iraq war wasn't worth fighting.
@Trollmaster21 Im defending the soldiers in Iraq, you think it was a waste for them to be there. You think they're dying for no reason and Im saying they're dying for a great cause. Im saying they did not die in vain and you're saying they did. You're pissing on their graves. Its proven that Saddam has plans on what to do with the WMD's during inspection and invasion. PROVEN. The American people are not on my side with this one because they don't know what I do.
@31guitar If you truly defended the US soldiers, you would have been opposed to the war from the start.
And let's say you prove Saddam had plans to use the WMD he didn't have. It's still not a threat worth invading and runing up the national debt over.
The American people now know that Saddam didn't have WMD when we invaded which trumps any proof that you claim to have that you were right to be wrong about WMD over your sources.
@Trollmaster21 I tell someone I have a cell phone. They come to my house to see it and by that time I had lost, does that mean I never had the phone to begin with? According to your horrible logic, I never had the phone. Saddam and other terrorists had plans to bomb many parts of the US, and Iran has plans to wipe out Israel when they get nukes, are you telling me this isn't threatening enough?
@31guitar So you're clinging to this theory that the WMD are lost and still out there. If they're found, you will have proved me wrong, but until then you just sound like a GOP hack who's making up excuses to justify this needless war instead of manning up and just simply admitting you were wrong.
And wouldn't Saddam use these WMD's to avoid capture instead of hiding in a sand hole? Another piece of common sense that escapes your pea brain.
@31guitar And your "source" is proven wrong as well since no WMD were found in Iraq after an extensive search.
And that's assuming you're not just lying. I'm sure you would love to forget about the forged documents about Saddam buying uranium from Niger. Partisan pro war cheerleaders are already confirmed to be proven liars, so why should I trust your kind now after you've been so wrong in the past? (denial you're wrong makes you a bigger idiot BTW)
@Trollmaster21 Pro-war? Democrats have started just as many wars as republicans, if not more. need I name them because you probably don't know history? Started by democrats - Mexican-American War, Civil war, WW1, WW2, Korean war, Veitnam war. republicans- Spanish-American war, Gulf war, War on terror. Wow, I wonder who the war-mongers really are.
@31guitar can't beat me on the war debate so you play the "well Dems are pro war too" card.
I'd much look at the reasons why we went to war (like the Iraq war, which I've proved you wrong over and over) than play the role of a partisan score card of which party starts the most wars.
@31guitar a lost cell phone is far harder to find than lost WMD that didn't exist to begin with.
And wouldn't have Saddam used his WMD before he got captured? That's another flaw in your logic big enough to drive a battleship through.
But stick to your conspiracy theory that these WMD that they still might be out there as a cheap excuse to avoid admitting you were wrong. Your words only prove that America must vote the Neocons out of existence to avoid anything like this in the future.
@Trollmaster21 Thank you for admitting your nothing but a communist punk who wants a one party system and has been brainwashed to deny any sense of logic whatsoever. Continue drinking the kool-aid. Btw, who bombs their own country with a WMD during an invasion if they want to live?
@31guitar Wrong. After voting the Republicans out of existence or very badly marginalizing them, a new grassroots political party can easily fill the void. The American people can easily do such a thing if we decided to. The fact you have not considered this, shows how little faith you have in the American people and/or your narrow mind for not thinking such a thing.
Yes one party rule is bad, but give another option besides corrupt and failed Republicans. America deserves one.
@31guitar Big time LOL....weren't you the one who said Saddam used WMD on his own people? Now you ask me who would use WMD on his own soil during an invasion? Did you have a major memory lapse or is this a different poster? You might want to see a doctor about your condition.
Do you stand for anything else besides being a cock sucker for GOP corruption, incompetence, and crony ism?
@31guitar So you're saying you have blind trust in your government and that you're a sheep.
And you're ignorant of the fact that "confidential intel" could be made up to advance the agenda of the Military Industrial Complex that you're a whore for.
@Trollmaster21 I swear you pull these things out of mid-air, you must. First its I have low expectations of the government and now I have blind trust in them? Just leave, please. Nobody here can take you seriously
@31guitar Saying it was the Generals, and not Bush that made the call to invade Iraq is the same thing as saying you have low expectations of you're leaders. You're just too foolish to know it.
And justifying the Iraq invasion based on classified intel, is another way of saying you have blind trust in the Bush admin.
You can deny these things 1000 more times, but it doesn't change the fact you're a weak minded fool that can easily be duped.
@31guitar Yes, you might want to run, because you're looking like the Bad News Bears in their first ball game X 10. You should stop before you look even worse. (if that's even possible)
@31guitar Gethiner and Rahm progressive? Obama not going to bat for the public option in health care progressive? Reappointing Bernakie as Fed chair progressive? Not investing past abuses of the Bush admin is progressive? Deal with PHARMA so we can't get lower cost prescription drugs progressive? I can provide many more examples, but I'm sure you get the idea.
@Trollmaster21 Actually Gethiner is a progressive, healthcare is going to be nationalized, say the people that actually wrote the bill. So continued out of control spending isn't a past abuse of Bush? I wasn't aware. Ill tell you what is progressive, take over of banks, healthcare, student loans, car industry, his new financial reform bill, the American Power Act he wants passed, His admin: Anita Dunn, Van Jones, Cass Sunstein, Hillary Clinton. I can provide more but I think you get the point.
@31guitar Progressives can't stand Gethiner. You're so clueless to think otherwise. The HC bill is so badly watered down. No public option, no buying lower priced drugs out of country, and not even a debate on single payer. By you saying those things are progressive, in truth, you're just telling everyone that you're denying reality. Those that scream "government take over" are just babbling another crazy conspiracy theory much like the death panel, birther and Obama's a Muslim crap.
@31guitar However if what you say is true, you surely must admit Rush, Hannity, O'Reily, and countless other GOP mouthpieces have shit for credibility at this time since for years they were duped by a progressive in their ranks and defended Bush's progressive policies countless times.
And also you insulted the bulk of Republican voters since they too voted for and were duped by a progressive, in the 2000 primaries.
Why should we trust them after they've been conned so badly in the past?
@31guitar Maybe you personally didn't attack the patriotism of those that questioned Bush and the Iraq war, but many GOP spokesmen did.
If you were for real you would admit that they were so very wrong. If you're a GOP hack who puts party before country and doesn't care about what's right or wrong, you won't condemn such people in your next post.
Our biggest obstacle in the general public is not people who actually want to tear down everything the founders created. It's what Vladimir Lenin called “Useful idiots” who shouldn't be allowed to leave their homes or converse with anybody on election day.
@kinney2040 I'd say the libertarian party would be the best choice.
Only a total brain dead idiot would be content with proven GOP failure, incompetence, and corruption. Such a person like that is clearly not of the spirit of our founding fathers.
What's beyond painful is continuing in the direction the Dems and Repubs and big centralized Government is taking us. Glenn Beck is a voice of courage and hope based on Truth and Values that originally created this great country. If you don't like Beck, you would not have liked Washington or Jefferson or Madison. You would have been on the side of tyranny and sneeringly making fun of those who fought for freedom. Shame on you.
How can you judge him as having no honor. ? He is laying out a plan for our future generations to restore honor to America. If you cant understand that I feel sorry for you. Because he has great Honor. Walk in his shoes. You may end up a HERO too.
gtgale1 4 weeks ago
We need a hero to save us? No we need to save ourselves!
CJbass420 4 months ago
how can a man with no honor help restore honor to our country?
kthulkidh 1 year ago
Biggest racist blok anywhere who tries his best to come across the middle road , sic bastard
TheIndopak 1 year ago
most Tea Party members don't even know what they are fighting for bcuz people like glen beck hide the REAL problem from them...glen beck is phony for not calling out the real problem which is the federal reserve/world banksters/central banks/rothchild and rockefeller families... but instead the "elite" who own the media tell folks like beck to divide us on racism and other bullshit that dont matter...WE THE PEOPLE MUST WAKE UP THIS IS A TAKEOVER BY THE BANKSTERS WHO GOT THE 37 TRILLION DOLLARS!!
DUBTEXENTERTAINMENT 1 year ago
@DUBTEXENTERTAINMENT I have to agree with you about the banks, they want us divided and focused on hate for each other when really we should all stand together against banks owning the world. You know what's going on, I can see it too. The banksters are evil and dangerous and far too powerful.
barelyaware 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@barelyaware please everyone go watch the first video on my page...god bless
DUBTEXENTERTAINMENT 1 year ago
I need a nap,he has lost me with Art Bell type conspiarcy theories
JohnnyJuanRico 1 year ago
this dude needs to be terrorised
CinemaOnePro 1 year ago
I'm ashamed to call myself a conservatitve when i hear or see Beck
seasonbree 1 year ago
May god bless the "Beckster" and the USA!
madero111 1 year ago
Some advice: Look up "McCarthyism". Now run a google search for "Glenn Beck Lies". It's time for all Americans to recognize that a man with no honor cannot restore honor. Only you can by tuning him out and thinking for yourselves.
FelineFive 1 year ago
On the contrary, Glenn Beck, it has everything to do with politics and power. Your class doesn't want to lose your power to the working people.
All you are is words. Where are your deeds?
Unlike you, Abe Lincoln supported the labor movement in his era. Martin Luther King Jr. also supported the labor movement.
solidarity4 1 year ago
Go blind dipshit.
techexecutioner 1 year ago
why the Lincoln Memorial, Lincoln believed in centralized Government
Gpgill2 1 year ago
@Gpgill2 No he didn't
31guitar 1 year ago
IF only we can...
maidmae8 1 year ago
Glenn needs to read the book "The Real Lincoln"
Gpgill2 1 year ago
How did this guy survive high school without getting his ass kicked? Just wondering.
grodge61 1 year ago
A Plea to Glenn Beck:
Please reconsider going to the Lincoln Memorial on Aug. 28. This day is reserved for the people who fought and died for the civil rights movement: Union workers and civil rights workers.
Choose another day to go.
solidarity4 1 year ago
@solidarity4 Blacks don't own MLK or his speech
31guitar 1 year ago
Glenn Beck is a white supremacist far-right war-monger who tricks the the proletariat into self-immolation.
Makron5 1 year ago
@Makron5 I can smell your desperation
GlennRoxWyo 1 year ago
Glenn Beck: Why are you going to the 47th Anniv. of the March on Washington for "Jobs and Freedom?"
You wouldn't have supported it if you were around in 1963. You were not there, but the labor unions were!
solidarity4 1 year ago
@solidarity4 How much did they pay you for this post.
GlennRoxWyo 1 year ago
Your the best Beck! Thank you for what you do,and thank god for putting you out there everyday to speak for the countless. We will walk with you on 8/28,and we will make a difference.
mamachaabear 1 year ago
glenn go to college you cant say you know more about our history when all you have is a High school Dep.
thadnokes 1 year ago
you're not looking glenn it my be Allen West.
QWERTY34990 1 year ago
Ah geez,what a joke
kevinharte27c 1 year ago
No, this has everything to do with who you are Glenn, a unscrupulous ego-maniac with no qualms about exploiting the stupidity of people to earn a buck. And what's up with that sick music?
MajasDad 1 year ago
What a jerkoff
Rauchus64 1 year ago
Glenn, only a hero like you knows how to expertly chop up lines of cocaine and drive drunk.
loonmaniac 1 year ago
This guy is the absolute phoniest creep to ever broadcast over the airwaves.
It's profoundly sad that people are so desperate that they would listen to his
bullshit.
51516 1 year ago
@51516 He is the most watched person on the Tv. . . .
(Fail^3*89/0)
Scotish223332 1 year ago
@Scotish223332 Exactly.
51516 1 year ago
@51516 He is also the most beloved and highly supported person on Television :P
(Sorry, but you probably mistake my message)
Scotish223332 1 year ago
@Scotish223332 Beloved? You have got to be joking..right?
Beck is a clown of the highest order. He just makes crap up
everyday, knowing full well that there are idiots out there eating it up!
51516 1 year ago
@51516 I can tell you who real clowns are; but Glenn Beck ins't one of them.
And its true; he is has huge ratings and is watched ALL the time :P
The best part is, He is right about most things as well :P
Scotish223332 1 year ago
God bless Glenn and the USA... I hope they pass the Unemployment extensions next week for the unemployed. The world is watching DC how they treat the unemployed etc... or sign an Executive Order that help them.
71Warrior4Jesus 1 year ago
It's about who are we, yes, but its also what have we allowed to happen to our great nation. We've allowed the ignorant & indoctrinated to elect an America-hating subverter into the Presidency of all things.
And we've allowed our public schools to become anti-American indoctrination centers for Marxist philosophy.
And we've allowed Sec-Progs to engrain their propaganda into our minds without challenge or analysis. Many of our long-held beliefs are simply lies, meant to destroy this culture.
NoGuff 1 year ago 3
The problem with most libertarians is that they're almost as fractured as the tea parties. It's the problem with democracy among strong and free-willed people: dissent. They often can't agree and won't compromise (which is a quality in everyplace but politica).
rjeremyhoward 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@rjeremyhoward
"The problem with most libertarians is that they're almost as fractured as the tea parties"
--The Tea Partiers are not fragmented, though it is a loose coalition of people. The only "fragments" in it are the Ron Paul "Libertarians."
"They often can't agree and won't compromise"
--That's life. But we do come to a consensus on most things. It's all a bell curve.
NoGuff 1 year ago
@NoGuff 1) Give me the signed primarily unquestioned leader of the Tea Parties and I will revise my statement of fracture.
2) That -is- life. And as I said, it is a quality in everyplace but politica.
rjeremyhoward 1 year ago
@rjeremyhoward
1. A group can have a single leader and still be fractured, you moron. The Tea Party is a movement based on a few principles, it's not a political party, it's composed of a diverse group of people.
2. Dissent and differing opinions don't exist in politics?
NoGuff 1 year ago
@NoGuff My sweet deity, do you need a massage? A percoset? Did your dog pee on the carpet? Why the hostility? Be cool.
I was replying to Trollmaster's reference to Libertarians needing to become the big dog to take on the political machine (perhaps I should have tagged him, ne?). I referenced Tea Parties because I hear the argument about Tea Parties needing to coagulate and do the same. I have the utmost respect for both sets of people, though I align myself officially with neither...
rjeremyhoward 1 year ago
@rjeremyhoward
"Why the hostility?"
--My apologies.
NoGuff 1 year ago
@NoGuff and on "dissent" in the great arena:
It's not about the differing ideas in the grand scheme of political agendas. It's a game of scratching each other's backs and getting as much as you can out of everyone else so you can keep getting re-elected. It's about forming ranks and gathering a larger army to not dissent too far from the present power's agenda.
What makes Libertarians and Tea Partiers so special is that they don't play that bullshit, for the most part. It's a beautiful thing. :)
rjeremyhoward 1 year ago
@rjeremyhoward
The Libertarians are a political party. You can't compare the tea parties with a political party. The tea parties focus on different areas but one thing we all agree on; this destruction of America's founding principles must be stopped....... and reversed.
qpwillie 1 year ago
@qpwillie Most of the Libertarians that I've encountered (and Tea Partiers, for that matter) are more than just couch coaches with politics. They're informed citizens with deep, deep rooted ideas and ideals. My problem with trying to promote either as legitimate third parties is the thing that makes them so great: No strong or central leadership. No one person or small cadre of folks really, truly have taken control. For both groups it is their greatest strength and biggest exploitable weakness.
rjeremyhoward 1 year ago
@rjeremyhoward
Not to be argumentative but I have to mention again that the tea party movement has no desire to become a third party. At this time, a third party is not the solution. The two controlling parties are too deeply rooted for us to try to defeat either of them. Sadly, the best hope for making any headway is carefully chosen members of the Republican party. As far as I can see, we have to take it one step at a time. (-;
qpwillie 1 year ago
@qpwillie Since the GOP can't name one thing they did to change their ways from the party that was rejected by America in 2006 and 2008, by voting Republican it's just the same as saying that you're content with the high level of corruption, incompetence and failure that the GOP is known for. Our founding fathers would never be content with such a proven shitty option like you are. You should be ashamed of yourself.
They already blew it and we the people rejected them for good reason.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21
You don't keep up with things much, do you Troller? Voter remorse is more rampant than it has ever been in this country.
qpwillie 1 year ago
@qpwillie I know that there are partisan GOP hacks out there that would love to try to make the argument that people regret voting the GOP out of power, but there's not a single source to back up this claim. If anything more people are fed up with both parties.
And the fact you can't name a single thing the GOP has done to change their corrupt and incompetent ways, just proves my point even further.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21
I never said there wasn't corruption in both parties. However, ALL the polls are not taken by "GOP hacks".
The fact is, one party has been completely taken over by a bunch of socialists who are intent on destroying everything this country was founded upon and people are waking up to it. Too bad you can't.
qpwillie 1 year ago
@qpwillie We hear the same old "the commies are taking over" crap every time there's a Democratic president.
You should have known that competent, respected, and trustworthy GOP leadership would have been the best defense of the evil socialist menace you're so afraid of.
Until you reform the GOP from within, and assure Americans that we won't see a return to the failed Bush era, you will continue to be a tool for corrupt, and incompetent leadership.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Its not just a democrat dude. The progressives have almost completely eaten up the democratic party, very few more centered dems exist. Unfortunately, progressivism exists in the GOP too (Bush and McCain). I never thought I would say this, but right now we need to be more like Britain, who is proposing massive government spending cuts and lowering many taxes (and increase in other taxes to get the liberal vote). Europe is waking up, why cant we?
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar And I wouldn't call waging an undeclared pre-emptive war based on information that was proven to be false progressive.
And thanks for confirming that Rush, Hannity, O'Reiley, and so many other right wingers are big time fools as they were duped into defending the progressive GW Bush countless times. You confirmed their opinions are shit and not worth listening to.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 How are you even about to complain about progressives when we have a bunch of them in the white house that you seem to support? Btw, Saddam did have WMD's, again, wake up
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar You're the one in a coma. We didn't invade Iraq because Saddam once had WMD some time ago, we were told he currently had them, and we were told wrong.
Finding 1000 more ways to say you were right to be wrong about Iraq will never change the fact you were wrong.
And your kind were even far more wrong to attack the patriotism of those that questioned Bush and invading Iraq.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 I attacked people for questioning Bush? No, Im just correcting your false information. CIA, Russia, Great Britain, NATO, Israel, Jordan, the king of Egypt all confirmed Saddam had WMD's. former Iraqi general Georges Sadas published a book called Saddam's Secrets, where he says he knows where the weapons went, the plane they were on, etc.
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Except for the fact there was no WMD. Hence you found 2 ways now to say that you were right to be wrong. And it still doesn't change the fact you were wrong.
If you're now babbling about a conspiracy theory about how the WMD were moved out of Iraq and still out there, you're just making a claim to some other bullshit you can't prove, instead of just doing the right thing and simply admit you were wrong.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Ok, lets ignore the fact that Saddam had plans on what to do with the WMD's during inspections or an invasion. Lets ignore that because apparently according to you who has no evidence, he did not have them. Cuz u were there right? Even though my evidence comes from people who were there or at least close. My dad has a friend who is a general. You would not believe the kinds of plans the terrorists had, one of the plans was to bomb the mall of America, would u want that to happen?
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar You're made up evidence is a result of you in major denial and a lack of character in willing to admit you were wrong.
The fact remains that no WMD were found since the invasion. That fact means everything and some conspiracy theory based on what other people have said means nothing.
And if you were right (which you're not) then that means Bush was a bigger failure than we all thought. After all those lives and dollars spent and these WMD are still out there? EPIC FAIL!!!
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 What I find funny is that you think that Bush had anything to do with it. the joint chiefs of staff make all those decisions, not Bush. What I find funny is that you are so stupid you wont accept reality and you claim im making things up. You know, whatever. Im not gonna argue with someone who wants to live in a fairy tale land
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar So now you're saying that Bush isn't responsible for going to war, which means you have very low expectations of your leaders.
And I'm just pointing out the reality in your fairy tale land. If what you say was true:
Bush failed, and wasted a ton of resources by invading Iraq if the WMD are still lurking around somewhere. (am I wrong about this?)
The opinions of many of the GOP hacks in the media are now deemed worthless because they were duped by a progressive in their ranks.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Hes not responsible for going into war so I have low expectations of my leaders? Where do you get that fucking idea? Iraq was not at all a total waste, we took out a dictator who planned to kill millions. I cant believe your against progressives but not Obama, maybe its just progressive republicans. Come talk to me when you decide to wake up and drop your partisan crap
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar You said "What I find funny is that you think that Bush had anything to do with it. the joint chiefs of staff make all those decisions"
That's where I got my fucking idea that you had low expectations of your leaders. It's not my fault you're too dumb to even know what you stand for.
Now are you saying these WMD are still out there or they don't exist? Please clear this up. Or do you even know where you stand on this?
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Well, see unlike you, I can think for myself. Just because I say Bush didn't get us into war doesn't at all mean I have low expectations. The WMD's are probably still out there, probably another muslim nation (Iran possibly). I realize this totally contradicts your fairytale land so you sit there and call it a conspiracy (it really isn't). I also love you haven't given one piece of evidence, its the typical, "Im right and your wrong, end of story" from you
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar you said:
"Just because I say Bush didn't get us into war doesn't at all mean I have low expectations."
Which is the same thing as saying that I'm not homophobic, I just hate gay people.
There were no WMD's found. I was right to question their existence, you were wrong to fall for propaganda. You're even more wrong to insist that you were right to be wrong because someone else was wrong too.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 No its not the same at all. You're a complete MORON. I dont think I've ever argued with someone as stupid and hard-headed as you. I laughed when I first read your post. Is this a joke? You must be kidding right? I dont think anybody can be this dumb
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar I bet you argued with your 1st grade teacher when she told you 2+2=4, and she got sick of explaining it 1000 times and put you in remedial math and you're still there right now.
Saying the US Generals are the reason we went to war in Iraq and not Bush, (especially after reading the PNAC's agenda, a group who ended up having many of it's members in the Bush admin) proves you have low expectations of your leader. By denying it over and over just makes you look worse.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar Evidence of what that someone doesn't have something? It's impossible to prove a negative. Did you flunk 3rd grade science?
The best thing to confirm if this threat was real would have been letting the UN inspectors do their jobs, to avoid war, death, and running up the US credit card. You can show your ignorance yet again by denying that the Bush admin was the reason why the inspectors withdrew.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar Oh and by defending this needless war non stop, you prove beyond a shadow of a doubt you're a fake conservative. As a real conservative at the time of this war would have asked for a tax hike to pay for this war instead of committing generational theft, and all the other stuff the GOP is now only pretending to care about.
I got many friends that are real conservatives and you're nothing like them. They're not shills for the hyper partisan GOP like you are.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Its ok little boy, I realize you have no concept of reality. Im sure there are some good mental institutions in this country. You should try getting into one
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar You should try to listen to reality instead of ignoring it.
You're a Neocon shill, and a mouthpiece for a return to the status quo of GOP incompetence, corruption, and failed leadership. There's commies living in America that are far more loyal and patriotic to the US than you and your kind are. 1000 more of your stupid insults will do nothing to change that.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Hahaha, It gets funnier every time you say stupid shit
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Bush did get us into that war. Are you a fucking stupid moron or is it a medical condition?
loonmaniac 1 year ago
@loonmaniac No actually, if u ask any high ranking general in the army, they will tell you these major decisions are made by the Join Chiefs of Staff based on confidential intel that they obviously aren't going to release to the public for national security reasons. So no im not a moron nor do I have a medical condition, Im just a little more informed than you
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Ahhh, that "confidential intel" that turned out to be a pack of lies, and then Bush and Cheney and that war criminal Rumsfeld were so surprised when an insurgency and sectarian violence kicked up. Good times, good times....
loonmaniac 1 year ago
@loonmaniac What was a lie? That no WMD's were found? Im sure thats true, but that doesn't mean he didn't have them. Quick question... If something is confidential and not released to the public, how do you know its a lie? Unless your a top government agent or something (which I doubt)
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Bush said that Saddam HAS WMD before he invaded, not he once had them a long time ago.
Now as a retort you're going to prove you're an idiot yet again by not knowing the difference between the words "has" and "had".
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar And the more you justify the bullshit Iraq war, the more you prove you're a bogus conservative. The war was waged by running up the national debt.
As any real conservative for that war, would have made sure it's being paid for.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar If something is confidential and not released to the public, how do you know it's the truth?
Hence you prove you have blind trust in your government, and you're too dumb to even know that's exactly what you just said.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Ik its the truth because my dad was told this by a high ranking general. Unless you heard otherwise from a top military official, im going with my source over your lack of any evidence whatsoever. Please keep babbling on like an idiot, it amuses me so much
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar The truth is no WMD were found, so your sources got it wrong.
You're just really saying "I was right to be wrong, because that's what the 'experts' told me." Instead of thinking for yourself. Your expert sources got it 100% wrong.
So keep pissing your pants about the WMD that never existed at the time of the Iraq invasion, and keep confirming you're a fool and a fake conservative.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Do you have a mental disorder? Its been proven that he had plans on what to do with the WMD's if their was an inspection or invasion. Just because we didn't see the weapons doesn't mean he didn't have them
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar So how much longer will it be until you admit that these WMD never existed and that GW Bush was dead wrong when he said "Saddam has WMD"? (the ones Bush claimed Saddam had before the invasion) 1 year? 5 years? Will you think that Saddam's WMD's are still out there in hiding 50 to 100 years from now? How many more years will you cling to this theory until you admit you were wrong?
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 I'll admit I'm wrong when you actually put forth facts that prove me wrong, which you haven't at all
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar My dad's cousin's girlfriend has a brother who's a janitor at NASA and he told me that Americans have been colonizing the moon for 25 years now so it must be true according to your warped views.
And in truth, I know many people who say they're conservative and they're nothing like you. In fact you give them an awful name.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 So my informed view on Iraq means im not a conservative? I actually dont even consider myself a conservative but ok, whatever.
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar If something is confidential and not released to the public, how do you know its the truth?
Governments deceived their own people since the beginning of civilization. You're a fool to site your source is classified information as proof. You're a bigger fool by denying that you just admitted that you have blind trust in your government.
Oh and most Americans now believe the war is a bad idea, so you also don't speak for the American people either.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 My source is a high ranking general in the US army and a historian. Whats yours? Its funny you libs hate that Bush got us into Iraq but don't say a word when Obama goes back on his promise and has yet to pull troops out of Iraq
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Well your source was wrong because no WMD's were found. To cling to a conspiracy theory that they're still out there somewhere only proves you're as loony as the birthers or 9/11 truthers.
And admitting you're not a conservative is the first real thing you said so far.
And Obama has been a huge letdown and I welcome a Democrat challenger against him in the 2012 primaries, since the GOP won't run anyone worthwhile.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 That last sentence was probably the first real thing you've said. I would vote for a moderate democrat over another progressive republican like McCain or Bush.
So because no WMD's were found, that means they weren't there? Scientists didn't think there was water on the moon, yet traces of water were found on the moon not too long ago. So far, I've provided evidence and sources, you haven't. So my arguement stands, and yours doesn't.
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Except the fact remains that these WMD were not found. That's a hole in your logic that you can drive a battleship through.
Your sources got it wrong, and instead of you doing the honorable thing and admit you were wrong, you make up a chain of cheap excuses, and piss on the graves of all those that died in Iraq due to this needless invasion.
And the American people are not on your side, as most now believe the Iraq war wasn't worth fighting.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Im defending the soldiers in Iraq, you think it was a waste for them to be there. You think they're dying for no reason and Im saying they're dying for a great cause. Im saying they did not die in vain and you're saying they did. You're pissing on their graves. Its proven that Saddam has plans on what to do with the WMD's during inspection and invasion. PROVEN. The American people are not on my side with this one because they don't know what I do.
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar If you truly defended the US soldiers, you would have been opposed to the war from the start.
And let's say you prove Saddam had plans to use the WMD he didn't have. It's still not a threat worth invading and runing up the national debt over.
The American people now know that Saddam didn't have WMD when we invaded which trumps any proof that you claim to have that you were right to be wrong about WMD over your sources.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 I tell someone I have a cell phone. They come to my house to see it and by that time I had lost, does that mean I never had the phone to begin with? According to your horrible logic, I never had the phone. Saddam and other terrorists had plans to bomb many parts of the US, and Iran has plans to wipe out Israel when they get nukes, are you telling me this isn't threatening enough?
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar So you're clinging to this theory that the WMD are lost and still out there. If they're found, you will have proved me wrong, but until then you just sound like a GOP hack who's making up excuses to justify this needless war instead of manning up and just simply admitting you were wrong.
And wouldn't Saddam use these WMD's to avoid capture instead of hiding in a sand hole? Another piece of common sense that escapes your pea brain.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar And your "source" is proven wrong as well since no WMD were found in Iraq after an extensive search.
And that's assuming you're not just lying. I'm sure you would love to forget about the forged documents about Saddam buying uranium from Niger. Partisan pro war cheerleaders are already confirmed to be proven liars, so why should I trust your kind now after you've been so wrong in the past? (denial you're wrong makes you a bigger idiot BTW)
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Pro-war? Democrats have started just as many wars as republicans, if not more. need I name them because you probably don't know history? Started by democrats - Mexican-American War, Civil war, WW1, WW2, Korean war, Veitnam war. republicans- Spanish-American war, Gulf war, War on terror. Wow, I wonder who the war-mongers really are.
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar can't beat me on the war debate so you play the "well Dems are pro war too" card.
I'd much look at the reasons why we went to war (like the Iraq war, which I've proved you wrong over and over) than play the role of a partisan score card of which party starts the most wars.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar a lost cell phone is far harder to find than lost WMD that didn't exist to begin with.
And wouldn't have Saddam used his WMD before he got captured? That's another flaw in your logic big enough to drive a battleship through.
But stick to your conspiracy theory that these WMD that they still might be out there as a cheap excuse to avoid admitting you were wrong. Your words only prove that America must vote the Neocons out of existence to avoid anything like this in the future.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Thank you for admitting your nothing but a communist punk who wants a one party system and has been brainwashed to deny any sense of logic whatsoever. Continue drinking the kool-aid. Btw, who bombs their own country with a WMD during an invasion if they want to live?
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Wrong. After voting the Republicans out of existence or very badly marginalizing them, a new grassroots political party can easily fill the void. The American people can easily do such a thing if we decided to. The fact you have not considered this, shows how little faith you have in the American people and/or your narrow mind for not thinking such a thing.
Yes one party rule is bad, but give another option besides corrupt and failed Republicans. America deserves one.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar Big time LOL....weren't you the one who said Saddam used WMD on his own people? Now you ask me who would use WMD on his own soil during an invasion? Did you have a major memory lapse or is this a different poster? You might want to see a doctor about your condition.
Do you stand for anything else besides being a cock sucker for GOP corruption, incompetence, and crony ism?
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar So you're saying you have blind trust in your government and that you're a sheep.
And you're ignorant of the fact that "confidential intel" could be made up to advance the agenda of the Military Industrial Complex that you're a whore for.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 I swear you pull these things out of mid-air, you must. First its I have low expectations of the government and now I have blind trust in them? Just leave, please. Nobody here can take you seriously
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Saying it was the Generals, and not Bush that made the call to invade Iraq is the same thing as saying you have low expectations of you're leaders. You're just too foolish to know it.
And justifying the Iraq invasion based on classified intel, is another way of saying you have blind trust in the Bush admin.
You can deny these things 1000 more times, but it doesn't change the fact you're a weak minded fool that can easily be duped.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar Yes, you might want to run, because you're looking like the Bad News Bears in their first ball game X 10. You should stop before you look even worse. (if that's even possible)
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar, you are lying. Go away.
klingoncelt 1 year ago
@31guitar Gethiner and Rahm progressive? Obama not going to bat for the public option in health care progressive? Reappointing Bernakie as Fed chair progressive? Not investing past abuses of the Bush admin is progressive? Deal with PHARMA so we can't get lower cost prescription drugs progressive? I can provide many more examples, but I'm sure you get the idea.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 Actually Gethiner is a progressive, healthcare is going to be nationalized, say the people that actually wrote the bill. So continued out of control spending isn't a past abuse of Bush? I wasn't aware. Ill tell you what is progressive, take over of banks, healthcare, student loans, car industry, his new financial reform bill, the American Power Act he wants passed, His admin: Anita Dunn, Van Jones, Cass Sunstein, Hillary Clinton. I can provide more but I think you get the point.
31guitar 1 year ago
@31guitar Progressives can't stand Gethiner. You're so clueless to think otherwise. The HC bill is so badly watered down. No public option, no buying lower priced drugs out of country, and not even a debate on single payer. By you saying those things are progressive, in truth, you're just telling everyone that you're denying reality. Those that scream "government take over" are just babbling another crazy conspiracy theory much like the death panel, birther and Obama's a Muslim crap.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar However if what you say is true, you surely must admit Rush, Hannity, O'Reily, and countless other GOP mouthpieces have shit for credibility at this time since for years they were duped by a progressive in their ranks and defended Bush's progressive policies countless times.
And also you insulted the bulk of Republican voters since they too voted for and were duped by a progressive, in the 2000 primaries.
Why should we trust them after they've been conned so badly in the past?
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@31guitar Maybe you personally didn't attack the patriotism of those that questioned Bush and the Iraq war, but many GOP spokesmen did.
If you were for real you would admit that they were so very wrong. If you're a GOP hack who puts party before country and doesn't care about what's right or wrong, you won't condemn such people in your next post.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@rjeremyhoward
Our biggest obstacle in the general public is not people who actually want to tear down everything the founders created. It's what Vladimir Lenin called “Useful idiots” who shouldn't be allowed to leave their homes or converse with anybody on election day.
qpwillie 1 year ago
@qpwillie See? The longer we have civil discourse, the more we find in common. ;) If only the rest of the world were so enlightened.
rjeremyhoward 1 year ago
Glenn, you have become the person you don't want to be but the one person we need today
31guitar 1 year ago 12
What an inspiring reason to return to the corruption, incompetence, and the failed leadership of the GOP.
Beck should be using his influence to advocate a 3rd party non stop.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
@Trollmaster21 and you have a better party to rely on?
kinney2040 1 year ago
@kinney2040 I'd say the libertarian party would be the best choice.
Only a total brain dead idiot would be content with proven GOP failure, incompetence, and corruption. Such a person like that is clearly not of the spirit of our founding fathers.
Trollmaster21 1 year ago
This is beyond painful
emmettmethven 1 year ago
@emmettmethven said: "This is beyond painful"
What's beyond painful is continuing in the direction the Dems and Repubs and big centralized Government is taking us. Glenn Beck is a voice of courage and hope based on Truth and Values that originally created this great country. If you don't like Beck, you would not have liked Washington or Jefferson or Madison. You would have been on the side of tyranny and sneeringly making fun of those who fought for freedom. Shame on you.
BillPigg 1 year ago 8
@BillPigg
Thank you for your words of wisdom my friend. Well said, ;-)
wolfeatworld 1 year ago
I wish I could join you Beck! I'll be there in spirit!
Silverfang797 1 year ago 3