@Soothfish Actually Obama never wrote a book with anybody who set off bombs and McCain and other Republicants have ties to right wing extremists and terrorists.
Respond to this video... I remember the day when an anti-government right wing extremist blew up a Federal building in Oklahoma city,putting into action all the hate and fear of government that Republicans have mouthed since the days of Barry Goldwater. I'm surprised the Republican Party didn't give him a medal.
@johndgray1 Timothy McVeigh was an avowed atheist/agnostic who hated the US military because of what he witnessed in the Gulf War. Or at least that's what he claimed in interviews.
I wouldn't expect you idiot liberals to know these facts. It's also funny how you always jump to defense of "government" and never ever to the defense of the little people and their freedoms. You are nothing but fascist scum. I'm sure that you would love to murder families for the "greater good". You'd just love it.
@Soothfish McVeigh hated the government just like a good right winger.I truly am surprised that he wasn't given a medal by the Republican Party for turning their anti-government rhetoric into action.BTW it was and remains liberals who are most committed to equal rights.
There is also the case of a good conservative Christian who murdered a Dr.George Tiller in Kansas,he did it for the greater good.
I never known a conservative to jump to the defense of the poor or the defenseless.
@johndgray1 George Tiller committed full fledged infanticide for the "greater good"? I don't support vigilantism but Tiller should have gotten life imprisonment for being one of the worst mass murderers in US history. Probably THE worst. Instead they dropped the case against him...even when he negatively impacted the health of the women.
@Soothfish Dr. Tiller performed medically necessary abortions for desperate women,and he was shot down and killed by someone who claimed it was for the greater good.
@johndgray1 Conservatives are constantly jumping to the defense of the poor and defenseless. No one is more defenseless than an unborn or newborn child or a 12 year old rape victim who is forced into the death clinic by the rapist himself. I have nothing more to say to you. You are not only a fanatically loyal to socialist politicians but you also treat little children as a disposable and worthless asset of the state. You are evil beyond words.
@Soothfish The worst mass murder in history was perpetrated by right wing nuts.The National Socialists.I can't think of anything good that conservatives have ever done for America,they done plenty to it,but absolutely nothing for it.
Conservatives always like to talk about getting the government out of people's lives and freedom of choice,but when it comes to reproductive matters they sure don't beleive in letting women choose if they want to have a child or not.
@johndgray1 The National Socialists had a gigantic government. That's why they were called the national SOCIALISTS. They also killed millions of unwanted people (many disabled) to save money. They were left wing in every sense of the word. Germany CHOSE to kill the unwanted just as you left wingers CHOOSE to kill your own children. We protect the innocent.
You are completely evil and have almost everything in common with the Nazis. Hopefully you will never get the opportunity to hurt anyone.
@Soothfish Yeah they were left wing.Yeah that must be why the first people to be introduced to Dachau were socialists and communists because the Nazis were left wing.You're a total fucking idiot,but that stands to reason because you're a conservative.
You could try asking any political scientist or even look it up on Wikipedia,the Nazis were right wingers.
@johndgray1 The Nazis supported big government which is the exact opposite of what American conservatives support. Apparently you are not just a monster but also a mindless monster. No redeeming personal qualities whatsoever. I am 100% certain that you have never lost so much as a single second of sleep over the torment and death of any innocent person. You are entirely inhuman. That is all I have to say to you. This "conversation" is finished.
@Soothfish No conservatives love big government.You don't see Boehner calling for smaller government and cutting waste out of the Pentagon budget by cancelling an unneeded and unwanted fighter jet engine that just happens to be produced in his district.Good conservative Christians want a big defense budget so they can show true Christian love to the rest of the world by bombing them.You won't hear them calling for big government not take of the levees on the Missouri or Mississippi.
Respond to this video... You will hear conservatives saying that government has to decide reproductive matters for women,after all that's what government is for women can't be trusted to make their own choices in the most personal and private area of life.Conservatives have done nothing go for America-NOTHING!
@Soothfish Actually McVeigh didn't claim that his actions had anything to do with Desert Storm.He blew up the Federal building as an act of retaliation against the government for its actions at Waco.
@TheBoonchan Millions of aerospace jobs leaving California?That would be news to Boeing.Because Congress added more C-17's to the budget beyond what the Pentagon wants the production line in California will be running at full tilt.
Being "mainstream" ,democrats and moderate republicans is what is wrong with America!Libs love to use the word "extremest" to describe somebody with conservative values.Our founding father would be considered extremist as well.
boxer complete moron,Palin brillant !!!!!!!!!!!!! listen to babs with the liberal press and control over our ability to listen ,then listen to Palin I REST MY CASE
@manbearpig8402 Is she? It seems that California is becoming idiotic enough to deserve her.
If that state gets another earthquake then they can go ahead pay for their own repairs with communism and kill off their survivors to "save resources". There isn't a single IQ point outside of Silicon Valley.
When I think about what has happened to a state I used to call home it makes me really sad. It makes me sad because it makes me think about what happens when a state succombs itself to extremism. California's fault was extreme government, the people voted in a dream they could not afford. Well and this is the price they have sown.
It's a pity there aren't more realist liberals like myself left in the world.
Want to talk about elitsm? This country was founded by white male Anglo-Saxon property owners and they were the only one's who had rights back then. Sounds like elitism is a good old American tradition. It's also in the eye of the beholder as well. Sarah Palin lied to the American people and was caught. And that's not my opinion of it, it's a fact.
Extremist? As a moderate, it's hard to see anything more extreme that the idiot from California...unfortunately "idiot from Cali-fornia" is too broad...are we talking about Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Diane Watson...the list goes on and on! All very scary!
Indeed, one must remember the American colonists were emerging FROM the tyranny of Church/State complicity in the Old World, & that also Washington DC is littered with Roman gods & symbols, not the least of which is the PERSONA of Minerva mounted upon the Capital Building, & her pet owl as revealed in DC street architecture. One fundamental of the 1776 revolution was & is a rejection of Romanism & the tyranny it represents, i.e., the Spanish Inquisition etc. They will attempt to co-opt any move.
Yes, I'm aware of the tyranny of Church/State union. That's why the Christian Right supported Robert Bork; they had a stooge who hates natural law and was willing to uphold (mistakenly) Church/State entanglements. Bearin mind though the original colonists had no problem with Protestant establishments and laws punishing people who rejected their brand of Christianity. Luther and Calvin had no problem with the idea of state-spnosored religious violence.
You're totally right about Church/State complicity being at war with natural law theory of the 17th and 18th century. Listen to anyone who wants to impose a state religion and you'll see a flaming hatred of natural law. Christian Right leaders have open hatred for natural law, from judges like Robert Bork to theologians like Gary North. The mind was created free, and religion can only advance through reason, not rape of moral conscience.
Next year the democratic party is going to get their asses handed to them for their bullshit nationalized health care fraud and crap & trade. The democratic way...tax and spend, tax and spend....Of course they will try every illegal, unethical, dishonest means possible to committ election fraud.
Nothing in the health reform bill nationalizes health care in the U.S. That's another lie spresd by right-wing propagandists. Not one person currently working in the private sector will have their job taken over by the government - not one. it's a game of muscial lies with you conservatives. If one lie doesn't stick then tell another is becoming the conservative creed.
Here's another thing you need to get through your head. Urban liberals are going to control social policy in America from now on. The urban voting blocs are just to big. They'll force wolves and anything else they want to force on you. If you don't like it secede from the union.
The urban liberals can kiss my butt. THEY can sucede from the union if they do not like the constitution of this country. It is so disgusting to see our country headed toward bankruptcy and ruin by a rotten congress and a two bit hustler as a president. I pray to god we can get rid of this scourge and elect an American in the next presidential election.
The urban liberals don't have to kiss your butt. You have to kiss theirs. They have the voting bloc power now, particularly in the House of Representatives. You want your bank account insured, you'll kiss their butts. You want your unemployment bennies, you'll kiss their butt. You want you Socail Security checks, you'll kiss their butt. They run the show and the urban voting bloc isn't going to swing to your way of thinking anytime soon. Stop being a baby about it and grow up.
The second revolution to return America to her constitutional moorings, MUST be undertaken. Sadly, there is no other choice. The people must immediately organize to resist & offset any further organized move to undermine & disolve America as a free & independent nation. All freedom loving people the world over, can in diversity, unite under the unlienable rights to life, liberty & property. No usurper, LEGAL PRETENSE or CORPORATE FICTION may deprive any law abiding man of these rights. Period.
Without entering my own personal take on this view, I have to say many of "the people" see this idea as a smokescreen for neofascism and a totalitarian state. In short, they see it as a "kill freedom to save it" scam. They believe that after this second revolution the only worldview that will be allowed to exist is yours. All freedom of speech, religion, press, and due process will be destroyed in the name of saving it. In short, some even interpret it as a Christian theocracy.
Well, since Boxer is extremely to the left, to her it looks like Palin is extremely to the right.
I'm not sure about how talking about her family values and fighting political corruption is anywhere as extreme as the amount of disgusting criticism she receives from even just the mainstream.
Palin lied to this nation on her Facebook page about the creation of a death panel in the Obama health care reform proposal. She's earned all the criticism she gets; frankly the mainstream criticism she's getting is too easy.
Sarah Palin took on corruption in Alaska and her enemies there put people up to harassing her. The liberals have spent untold millions to discredit her.
Barbara Boxer is likely in the pocket of special interest groups. Global warming is a huge fraud. Many companies are set up to profit greatly from a cap and trade bill.
Liberals don't need to discredit Sarah Palin. Palin is a pathological liar who tried to deceiver the American people on her Facebook page by falsely claiming Obama's health care proposal would establish a death panel to decide whether her Down's Syndrome baby and parents would live. She tried to decive the American people and got caught. The woman is a moral fraud and a political menace.
If Sarah Palin lied, then what did Obama remove from the bill that they talked about in the news for days? And how could she lie about that Obama claims has never been written yet? You are a liar and an Obama-bot POS. Obama is a pathalogical liar, as is Pelosi and most other demoncrats.
There was nothing about a death panel in that bill to begin with. Sen. Grassley pushed to change was the langauge of voluntary living will counselling and other optional end of life provisions. There was NEVER one sentence in any version of that bill creating a panel of officials who'd decide who lives and who dies. You are the one lying and your own words prove it. If you had to ask what Obama removed from the bill then you didn't know in the first place. You and Palin stand as proven liars.
"MyTruths" are exactly that - your own. Republican lawmakers like Charles Grassley admitted there was never a death panel in Sec. 1233 (the part Palin cites) of the health care bill. Yet by your own admission you never read it in the first place. You convicted yourself of intellectual dishonesty in the process. I suggest you get your factsa straight and do your own research before parroting lying Christian fanatics like Sarah Pain.
So, If Sarah Palin was lying, what was taken out of the bill and why was it taken out?
Barack Oliar is unqualified to be president he is a two bit con. You are an O-bot of his with no caring towards people other than you want the other guy to pay for your laziness. You are a loser!
As Judge Judy would say, "Put your listening ears on!" I answered your question but you can't handle the facts here. First off, if a "death panel" was once in the bill you could prove it because all earlier versions of the bill are a matter of public record. Palin cited Sec. 1233 of the earlier version and sadly there was no death panel there to be found. The only thing Grassley and others pushed to change was Sec. 1233's wording about voluntary end of life counselling - period.
So, Answer the question. You will not because you are a lying democrat. You try to disguise your evil and lies as good for "poor" and "misfortunate" people.
The fact is: Sarah Palin is a good, honest, great American. Something you are not.
Your question was answered. You're now changing the issue here. There never was any death panel in Sec. 1233 of Obama's bill. That's a proven lie, and you can't make it stick by just repeating it. How am I evil by pointing out a fact? Someone's evil was uncovered here, but it was not mine. You're disgusing your evil in the name of "honesty" and 'goodness." You've been caught in a lie and now you're trying snake out of it by raising other issues. You're caught, face it.
You are a typical lying democrat. Oliar did have a provision removed. The news covered it. It was the talk for a week. What you are denying was basically a death panel. You are mincing on words. As an O-bot that is what you do. Your whole ideology is wrong and all anyone has to do to see it is look at California. It is a cesspool of democrats that have transformed a beautiful state into a haven for illegals that are ruining our country. Sarah Palin is great!!!!!!!!
Just who's mincing words here? There's no such thing as "basically a death panel." No version of Sec. 1233 ever gave anyone the power to decide who lives or who dies. Palin lied about that intentionally. As I told you before, the change you're referring to was the langauge of the voluntary living will counselling. I'm aware of that change, that's the one I've been talking about. Also as I said before all previous versions of the bill are a matter of public record. There's no death panel period.
You're trying to cover up Palin's lie by telling lies of your own. The original langauge of the Obama bill had nothing remotely resembling a death panel. Even Republican Sen. Charles Grassley and Republican pundits admit that Palin was dead wrong. No provision of that bill *ever* empowered *anyone to decide who lives and who dies. You're so caught up in Palin's cult of personality that you can't see she's a filthy liar. She was making it all up and so, sadly, are you.
You are a typical liberal democrat. You lie for money. You lie for power. You never represent what you are supposed to be representing. Earlier you claimed that I said I had not read the bill. You are a damn liar! I did not say any such thing. You attack Sarah Palin because she is honest and for the people. She does not have any big money backing her. Your stench reminds me of Nancy Pelosi....all lies and deceit. Sarah Palin was right about the death panel. Nothing was removed?
You admitted you didn't know what was in the bill. That means you didn't read it, and that means you're a liar or an ignoramus if you make claims about what's in there when you said it contained a death panel. It never did at any time since it was introduced. There's no death panel and there never was. Palin is lying, and so are you. Everyone reading our exchange sees you for what you are. There's no death panel and there never was.
Boxer is a butt ugly dog that should get some plastic surgery as has Nancy Pelosi. At minimum she needs to put a hell of a lot more makeup on, which she sorely needs!
A beautiful person doesn't try to deceive a whole nation. You and Palin are cut from the same cloth. When caught in a lie, you tell another lie. You're caught with your hand in the cookie jar. Deal with it. Most people aren't buying her lies anymore. Sadly, you're so caught up in her cult of personality that you can't see the cold hard fact: the death panel is a fiction. Do you know what the word fiction means? It means fake, not real...sort of like your moral center.
You are a typical liberal damn liar. You fabricated a statement. First you claimed I said I did not read it. That is a lie. Now you are saying I admitted I did not know what was in it. That is a lie. Answer the question. If there was nothing that could be construed as a death panel then what has been in the news that was removed after Sarah Palin's comments? Tell me another lie or dodge the question. That is what liars do. You remind me of that hag Boxer. If you are in Cal - stay there
You didn't know what was in it so that proves you never read it. That's not fabrication of anything - it's deduction. If your read it you would have known what was in it and no death panel was there. Palin lied and you''re in denial. You're trying to save a liar by becoming a liar yourself. You didn't even know about Sec. 1233 until I mentioned it otherwise you would've cited the "death panel" langauge verbatim to prove me wrong. You didn't, and that proves my case. There was nothing to cite.
Your question was answered before on this string but you're willfuly ignoring it and that's a form of lying too. Lying seems to come naturally to you. I'll answer it again. The provision in the news was the wording of voluntary living will counselling that Sen. Grassley wanted changed. He and all the other Republicans in Congress admit there was *never* any death panel. So answer my question: Are all the Republicans in Congress and the RNC liars too now because they say Pain was wrong?
Sarah Palin talks straight. That is one of the reasons liberals hate her. For you to say I am cut from the same cloth is a huge compliment to me.....THANK YOU! I am starting to like you after that statement!
If you want to be a part of socialism, then why don't you move to a socialist country and leave the United States? If this socialized medicine is so great, why is it imploding in Canada? I think it would be great if you moved to France. Mexico would be fine for you too.
Palin talks straight if your definition of straight is the motion of a sidewinder rattlesnake. You and Palin defend your lies by using morality and patriotism as a cover. Palin lied to the American people she supposedly loves. That's called the "Big Lie" tactic - Hitler used it with great success. As far as Canada's health care imploding, that's just conservative propaganda. There's no big movement in Canada to abolish it. Palin lied and got caught red-handed. You're in denial - deal with it.
You will lie about anything to get your agenda approved. The outgoing president of the CMA criticized it too. I have relatives that live 4 miles from the Canadian Border for many years and they say they have never heard one good word about the Canadian medical system from any of their Canadian friends. You are in denial. I wonder just how you are set to benefit from this government takeover of private industry. You have the stench of a lying far left liberal democrat.
You're the one lying here. In fact, you're playing a game of "musical lies." The death panel never existed, and that's a fact. There's no government takeover of private industry either in the health care bill either, and that's a fact. Not one person in the health care industry will be required to work for the government - not one. You're the proven lair here, because you're making things up as you go along. Your death panel lie isn't sticking so you try another lie.
I am kicking your ass in this battle! If we were face to face you would be wimpering for your mommy! You have lied repeatedly and I have came back with the truths. You are a democrat and therefore want everything government controlled. That is not what the constituion and this country is all about. So, now I am going to be paing for these tattoo freaks, drug addicts, alcoholics, daredevils, idiots mistakes and poor lifestyles because thats what people like YOU want. No way!
You're doing nothing but exposing yourself to be a pathological liar. You don't know what you're talking about; all you're doing is parroting right-wing propaganda a la Rush Limbaugh and other brainless talking heads. You don't know how to do your own thinking, let alone your own research.
Our government is bankrupt now. Our democratic president adn democrat controlled congress have spent about double what will be taken if for the year. Now you idiots want to keep spending a lot more. The mistake of electing Obama will linger to diminish America forever. A harsh learning experience that emphasizes the importance of the responsibility individuals have in a representative democracy. Now our only hope is that we can decelerate the headlong destruction occurring in America.
You sound like a prerecorded message after the play button is pushed. Health care costs under the greedy private industry moguls have risen three times faster than wages over the last ten years. that means individual responsibility counts for nothing. This steep increase in costs is beyond the control of most individuals. As far as deficit spending goes, the Republicans rationalized it in the name of national security. The moral of the story is clear: one excuse is as good as another.
Medical Technology....has doubled approximately every six years and will continue to do so without government intervention (which means the same as government corruption). Because technology reasearch, patents, equipment costs money, naturally the costs have gone up. Please go back and read what I just wrote again before continuing any further. . It is a fact. Now try to digest that. Granted, there could be reforms with the system in place with a prime example being tort reform.
You just shot yourself in the foot chief . If what you're saying is true then you just explained *why* capitalism doesn't work in health care. You're making this too easy.
Wake up ace, we're rationing health care in this country now. The private industry underwriters you worship already call the shots over which procedures get funded and how much they're funded. Get your head out of the sand. We're already there. You're not very informed about too much are you. The national health care bill has no rationing provisions at all. You're grasping at straws now.
You are such an evil, lying individual. Your blatant, brazen lies remind me of Nancy Pelosi. I have decided you have to be either Nancy Pelosi or Barbara Boxer. We do not have health care rationing right now. Get your head out of your ass!
The only liar here is you. You've defended a liar who said the Obama health care reform contained a death panel to decide if sick children and old people would live or die. No such panel ever existed in that bill. And yes, we do have rationing now. The private companies decide what treatments they will authorize and what they won't. They routinely refuse to pay for MRIs and CAT scans despite doctor's orders. Private companies can ration care as easy as the government can.
I answered your question, so why won't you answer mine. Why does the Republicans in Congress and thr RNC admit there was never any death panel in Obama's bill? Moreover, if the Canadian health care system is so rotten then why didn't the Canadians vote it out years ago?
You never did answer my question because you can't. The Canadians are too stupid to raise hell enough. They lost their gun rights too. They hate that and have never gotten them back. It is a problem primarily they have with one province dictating what others do, just like in the US.. People from DC imposing their will on others. I'm in Montana. We had the feds force wolves on our state against our will. The morons hurt our state badly with that move. We should have fought it more.
I answered your question twice already. I'll answer it again. The provision removed from the health care reform bill simply allowed people to bill Medicare for *voluntary* living will counselling. That's it. That langauge gave nobody, I repeat, nobody the power to decide who lives and who dies. Even all the Republicans in Congress admitted that. Conservative Charles Krauthammer even said Sarah Palin should leave the room for the rest of the health care debate. She lied to America - deal with it.
I say you are lying again. So, if it had nothing that could be construed as a death panel, then why did they remove it? Actually, I would like a death panel if I could be on it. Sarah Palin did not lie about it and I have heard many people who political analysts defend what she said. She does not have big money interests backing her. It comes from her heart. She is a true great American. It is obvious by now that I have owned you on this subject and Sarah Palin owns you too.
You're the one laying because you're deliberately ignoring the facts. The only thing removed was a provision allowing Medicare to fund voluntary living will advice. There was nothing in there that could even remotely be construed as a death panel. A death panel makes the final decision who lives or dies - period . Living will advising just informs patients what choices the patients have in a living will - choice the patients themselves make and not the government. There's no fine line on this.
No political analyist currently believes there ever was a death panel. Sarah Palin and you are using McCarthyite tactics to make your case. McCarthy made false accusations until they'd stick. Palin and you own one thing only : dishonor. Joe Welch's words apply well to you two: "Have you no sense of decency." Sen. Grassley, another snake, knew the Republicans got caught in a lie. The uneditied Sec. 1233 is still public record. You won't find anything remotely resembling a death panel.
Let me explain the difference between a death panel since the concept eludes you. A death panel makes arbitrary life and death decisions. If a patient comes before a death panel the governenment officals on the panel have the final word - live or die. Under the Sec. 1233 provision that was removed Medicare simply would've funded advice for living wills, leaving the patient with the final decision. Chuck Grassly knew his party was caught in a lie so he and his snakes had to cover their tracks.
There never was a Sec. 1233 death panel provision. Palin put that section up on her Facebook page as proof but the fact is there was never even one word about a group of officials who would decide who's fit to live. Nobody was going to kill off her Down's Syndrome baby or her parents - nobody. You bill yourself as MyTruth but facts are as disposable to you as tissue paper. And how do you know I'm lazy or uncaring? Don't you see you're just making things up as you're going along?!? That is bad.
Boxer is a shill for the CORPORATE Collective. Global warming is a scientific hoax, another fabrication of pretext for social, political & military action, used so often by ruling elites to gain the sanction of the people. It's not surprising Sarah Palin was out maneuvered when the press & those who manipulate the currency came against her. In my view, Boxer is a radical - an emotional terrorist who exploits the commodification of natural shifts in weather patterns, as covert political currency.
Ha! What a howler! Right wingers complaining about elitism. Brush up on your history - conservatism since the time of Edmund Burke has been a defense of elitism, not an attack on it. The essence of conservative thought up until about 30 years ago was the people are too stupid to know what's good for them and now the Right is co-opting the langauge of the loony Left in the 60s. Where do you think "Power to the People" came from? Laura Inbredham? Why do you think Nixon himself used it? Sheeshh...
All CORPORATE CARTEL MONOPOLISTS are LEFT-WING regressive COLLECTIVISTS. Rockefeller, the Bush faction & I.G.FARBEN, the German CARTEL of "like interests" - a monopoly cartel, were/are all LEFT-WING regressive SOCIALISTS. They are SOCIAL DARWINISTS who believe in the survival of the "fittest" & "practical" EUGENICS, as a means of culling the herd. COLLECTIVISM can be either CORPORATE as in ROCKEFELLER, or ideological, as in STALIN. COLLECTIVISM postures with moral currency, "left" or "right."
Yes, I was a salesman for that back when I was a member of the John Birch Society. The problem is two opposite concepts are being blended in your case. Collectivism and Social Darwinism seek different results. Collectivism tries to make everyone a socioeconomic equal; Social Darwinism runs on "whoever dies with the most toys wins." Ideally under full collectivism neither a Rockefeller or a dead homeless man would exist. Under Social Darwinism the richest man is the ideal man.
All top down authoritarian power structures, are LEFT-WING regressive. What IS "progessive," is the American notion of a Constitutional Republic, wherein human beings are assured the unlienable rights to life, liberty & property, including ones most personal item of property, the fruits of ones labor. In the Hegelian dialetic, conventional notions of right/left are flip-sides of the same good-guy, bad-guy routine. Hitler knew he could easily mold "brown" Nazis from "red" Collectivist Communists.
Well, I guess I made my point that Collectivism and Social Darwinism are opposites. As to the poly spectrum you're using I'm familiar with it. The Birchers use it, and the far Right of that spectrum is anarchism - no government.. That spectrum isn't used in political discourse; a derivative of the Left/Right seating of the French Legislative Assembly of 1791-92 is used. I'm also aware of ex-Reds becoming Nazis - they were called "beefsteak Nazis" (red on the inside, brown on the outside).
This may or may not come as a shock, but the notion of inalienable rights is largely discredited in not only academic circles but among the masses in general. Utilitarians did a hatchet job on the natural law ideal of God-given rights by the 1820s. Even conservatives like Robert Bork reject the notion of inalienable rights and natural law as total fictions.
Robert Bork is incorrect. Natural law is not a FICTION. All... "COLOR-OF-LAW," LEGAL PERSONAS, CORPORATE ENTITIES & LEGAL PERSONAS are FICTIONS. As John Quincy Adams puts it, "those things which appear to be, but are not." And the word is "un"lienable." The government shall place no "lien," against the labor or wages of a man. Thus, the un'lienable" right to life, liberty & property, three rights not available to the common man in the old world. America is the New World, not the New World Odor.
Yes, I'm no fan of Robert Bork either. Guys like him screwed up the conservative movement. he was one of the most intellectually dishonest wretches of the late 20th century. Natural law is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence itself and what does he do? He disposes of natural law by arguing the Declaration is evil and the source of our problems. Bork is utilitarian in his view of rights; he thinks they're mere creations of society and thus disposable by society at will. Bork the neocon..
Amen to that! Sarah Palin and the rest of the Christian Right are destroying the Republican party and most of the spineless moderates in the GOP don't have the stones to point out what the real problem is here: a group of crazed theocrats who want to ram their perverted form of Christianity down our throats.
Frankly I see no comparison between a slave plantation and anything Boxer has ever proposed. That's just John Birch Society thinking and I know because I was a Bircher back in the 80s. Those arguments don't cut it anymore - people aren't buying it. You need some better conspiracy theories than that to scare people.
if you were a Bircher at anytime you were a moron....hilarious: a "former Bircher" defending Barbra Boxcutter...go troll for the Obamanazi's elsewhere
Fear motivates people to do things they otherwise would not. People were paranoid about communism back then. We watched "Red Dawn" in those days and believed it. If I rejected the Birchite worldview long ago then it's hardly surprising that I'd defend Boxer. Moreover, the idea that Obama's supporters are Nazis is yet another example of Birchite-style thinking. Do you have a blue and cream white membership card in your wallet? Remember, Eisenhower really was a Communist! *grin*
Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) rocks! She lives her faith & has shown American women that you don't have to kill your own baby to live your dreams. God bless Sarah Palin, her family & friends & Alaska! Palin truly loves America & has a vision for what's best for our country.
Sarah Palin is a political train wreck who can't even govern the tiny population of Alaska. You anti-abortion peeps need to realize it's not the paramount issue in America. You also need to realize that people don't want to live in a Christian theocracy either - which is Palin's vision for what's best for our country in the view of many.
I remember the day when Sarah Palin set off bombs at the Pentagon...oh wait that was Obama's co-author.
Liberals are idiots
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish Actually Obama never wrote a book with anybody who set off bombs and McCain and other Republicants have ties to right wing extremists and terrorists.
johndgray1 6 months ago
Respond to this video... I remember the day when an anti-government right wing extremist blew up a Federal building in Oklahoma city,putting into action all the hate and fear of government that Republicans have mouthed since the days of Barry Goldwater. I'm surprised the Republican Party didn't give him a medal.
johndgray1 6 months ago
@johndgray1 Timothy McVeigh was an avowed atheist/agnostic who hated the US military because of what he witnessed in the Gulf War. Or at least that's what he claimed in interviews.
I wouldn't expect you idiot liberals to know these facts. It's also funny how you always jump to defense of "government" and never ever to the defense of the little people and their freedoms. You are nothing but fascist scum. I'm sure that you would love to murder families for the "greater good". You'd just love it.
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish McVeigh hated the government just like a good right winger.I truly am surprised that he wasn't given a medal by the Republican Party for turning their anti-government rhetoric into action.BTW it was and remains liberals who are most committed to equal rights.
There is also the case of a good conservative Christian who murdered a Dr.George Tiller in Kansas,he did it for the greater good.
I never known a conservative to jump to the defense of the poor or the defenseless.
johndgray1 6 months ago
@johndgray1 George Tiller committed full fledged infanticide for the "greater good"? I don't support vigilantism but Tiller should have gotten life imprisonment for being one of the worst mass murderers in US history. Probably THE worst. Instead they dropped the case against him...even when he negatively impacted the health of the women.
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish Dr. Tiller performed medically necessary abortions for desperate women,and he was shot down and killed by someone who claimed it was for the greater good.
johndgray1 6 months ago
@johndgray1 Conservatives are constantly jumping to the defense of the poor and defenseless. No one is more defenseless than an unborn or newborn child or a 12 year old rape victim who is forced into the death clinic by the rapist himself. I have nothing more to say to you. You are not only a fanatically loyal to socialist politicians but you also treat little children as a disposable and worthless asset of the state. You are evil beyond words.
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish The worst mass murder in history was perpetrated by right wing nuts.The National Socialists.I can't think of anything good that conservatives have ever done for America,they done plenty to it,but absolutely nothing for it.
Conservatives always like to talk about getting the government out of people's lives and freedom of choice,but when it comes to reproductive matters they sure don't beleive in letting women choose if they want to have a child or not.
johndgray1 6 months ago
@johndgray1 The National Socialists had a gigantic government. That's why they were called the national SOCIALISTS. They also killed millions of unwanted people (many disabled) to save money. They were left wing in every sense of the word. Germany CHOSE to kill the unwanted just as you left wingers CHOOSE to kill your own children. We protect the innocent.
You are completely evil and have almost everything in common with the Nazis. Hopefully you will never get the opportunity to hurt anyone.
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish Yeah they were left wing.Yeah that must be why the first people to be introduced to Dachau were socialists and communists because the Nazis were left wing.You're a total fucking idiot,but that stands to reason because you're a conservative.
You could try asking any political scientist or even look it up on Wikipedia,the Nazis were right wingers.
johndgray1 6 months ago
@johndgray1 The Nazis supported big government which is the exact opposite of what American conservatives support. Apparently you are not just a monster but also a mindless monster. No redeeming personal qualities whatsoever. I am 100% certain that you have never lost so much as a single second of sleep over the torment and death of any innocent person. You are entirely inhuman. That is all I have to say to you. This "conversation" is finished.
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish No conservatives love big government.You don't see Boehner calling for smaller government and cutting waste out of the Pentagon budget by cancelling an unneeded and unwanted fighter jet engine that just happens to be produced in his district.Good conservative Christians want a big defense budget so they can show true Christian love to the rest of the world by bombing them.You won't hear them calling for big government not take of the levees on the Missouri or Mississippi.
johndgray1 6 months ago
Respond to this video... You will hear conservatives saying that government has to decide reproductive matters for women,after all that's what government is for women can't be trusted to make their own choices in the most personal and private area of life.Conservatives have done nothing go for America-NOTHING!
johndgray1 6 months ago
@johndgray1 It really looks like you have become so twisted and evil that you are beyond any hope for redemption. Very sad.
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish Actually McVeigh didn't claim that his actions had anything to do with Desert Storm.He blew up the Federal building as an act of retaliation against the government for its actions at Waco.
johndgray1 6 months ago
Boxer wouldn’t be in such a tight race if she wasn’t cause of millions of aerospace jobs leaving the state. YES WE CAN bankrupt and destroy America!!
TheBoonchan 1 year ago
@TheBoonchan Millions of aerospace jobs leaving California?That would be news to Boeing.Because Congress added more C-17's to the budget beyond what the Pentagon wants the production line in California will be running at full tilt.
johndgray1 6 months ago
don't call her ma'am, call her FIRED! Boxer is the EXTREMIST
THINK OUTSIDE OF THE BOXER
VOTE FOR CARLY!
zigzagzoo12 1 year ago
Plain = smart Boxer= dumb ass liberal BITCH
bluedemon245 1 year ago
Being "mainstream" ,democrats and moderate republicans is what is wrong with America!Libs love to use the word "extremest" to describe somebody with conservative values.Our founding father would be considered extremist as well.
dej769 1 year ago
Pot, meet kettle.
JohnScott700 1 year ago
boxer complete moron,Palin brillant !!!!!!!!!!!!! listen to babs with the liberal press and control over our ability to listen ,then listen to Palin I REST MY CASE
DORSEY12100 1 year ago
Yes Pal8in is stupid for she thinks we should be in control of this country. How stupid of Palin be believing that.
turtle4aire 1 year ago
she isn't MAINSTREAM boxer!!!! That's what we like about her!!
runPALINrun
tommyrc1990 2 years ago
And Boxer is not an extremist?
TargetGuy2245 2 years ago
its all over boxer
ejmil007 2 years ago
@ejmil007 Yougot it
turtle4aire 1 year ago
(disclaimer: I'm a pretty liberal person who actually agrees with Boxer on this but this just has to be said):
Barbara Boxer is an extreme bitch well outside the mainstream acceptable level of bitchiness.
manbearpig8402 2 years ago
I agree with you except for the fact that Sarah Palin is a great woman. and BOXER IS OUT come election time... She's running scared
lucychalmers 2 years ago
@manbearpig8402 Is she? It seems that California is becoming idiotic enough to deserve her.
If that state gets another earthquake then they can go ahead pay for their own repairs with communism and kill off their survivors to "save resources". There isn't a single IQ point outside of Silicon Valley.
Soothfish 6 months ago
@Soothfish
I'm beginning to think you might be right mate.
When I think about what has happened to a state I used to call home it makes me really sad. It makes me sad because it makes me think about what happens when a state succombs itself to extremism. California's fault was extreme government, the people voted in a dream they could not afford. Well and this is the price they have sown.
It's a pity there aren't more realist liberals like myself left in the world.
manbearpig8402 6 months ago
my impression is..Barbara boxer is a liberal, elitist, bitch. And thats my opinion of it
rogerthatrocks 2 years ago
Want to talk about elitsm? This country was founded by white male Anglo-Saxon property owners and they were the only one's who had rights back then. Sounds like elitism is a good old American tradition. It's also in the eye of the beholder as well. Sarah Palin lied to the American people and was caught. And that's not my opinion of it, it's a fact.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Extremist? As a moderate, it's hard to see anything more extreme that the idiot from California...unfortunately "idiot from Cali-fornia" is too broad...are we talking about Henry Waxman, Nancy Pelosi, Maxine Waters, Diane Watson...the list goes on and on! All very scary!
BillFreeborn 2 years ago
Indeed, one must remember the American colonists were emerging FROM the tyranny of Church/State complicity in the Old World, & that also Washington DC is littered with Roman gods & symbols, not the least of which is the PERSONA of Minerva mounted upon the Capital Building, & her pet owl as revealed in DC street architecture. One fundamental of the 1776 revolution was & is a rejection of Romanism & the tyranny it represents, i.e., the Spanish Inquisition etc. They will attempt to co-opt any move.
Eliezer18 2 years ago
Yes, I'm aware of the tyranny of Church/State union. That's why the Christian Right supported Robert Bork; they had a stooge who hates natural law and was willing to uphold (mistakenly) Church/State entanglements. Bearin mind though the original colonists had no problem with Protestant establishments and laws punishing people who rejected their brand of Christianity. Luther and Calvin had no problem with the idea of state-spnosored religious violence.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You're totally right about Church/State complicity being at war with natural law theory of the 17th and 18th century. Listen to anyone who wants to impose a state religion and you'll see a flaming hatred of natural law. Christian Right leaders have open hatred for natural law, from judges like Robert Bork to theologians like Gary North. The mind was created free, and religion can only advance through reason, not rape of moral conscience.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
gallerian1fsf, What state are you in?
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Pennsylvania, where we handed Obama a big win and we'll do it again in 2012 sweet cheeks.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Next year the democratic party is going to get their asses handed to them for their bullshit nationalized health care fraud and crap & trade. The democratic way...tax and spend, tax and spend....Of course they will try every illegal, unethical, dishonest means possible to committ election fraud.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Nothing in the health reform bill nationalizes health care in the U.S. That's another lie spresd by right-wing propagandists. Not one person currently working in the private sector will have their job taken over by the government - not one. it's a game of muscial lies with you conservatives. If one lie doesn't stick then tell another is becoming the conservative creed.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Here's another thing you need to get through your head. Urban liberals are going to control social policy in America from now on. The urban voting blocs are just to big. They'll force wolves and anything else they want to force on you. If you don't like it secede from the union.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
The urban liberals can kiss my butt. THEY can sucede from the union if they do not like the constitution of this country. It is so disgusting to see our country headed toward bankruptcy and ruin by a rotten congress and a two bit hustler as a president. I pray to god we can get rid of this scourge and elect an American in the next presidential election.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
The urban liberals don't have to kiss your butt. You have to kiss theirs. They have the voting bloc power now, particularly in the House of Representatives. You want your bank account insured, you'll kiss their butts. You want your unemployment bennies, you'll kiss their butt. You want you Socail Security checks, you'll kiss their butt. They run the show and the urban voting bloc isn't going to swing to your way of thinking anytime soon. Stop being a baby about it and grow up.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
The second revolution to return America to her constitutional moorings, MUST be undertaken. Sadly, there is no other choice. The people must immediately organize to resist & offset any further organized move to undermine & disolve America as a free & independent nation. All freedom loving people the world over, can in diversity, unite under the unlienable rights to life, liberty & property. No usurper, LEGAL PRETENSE or CORPORATE FICTION may deprive any law abiding man of these rights. Period.
Eliezer18 2 years ago
Without entering my own personal take on this view, I have to say many of "the people" see this idea as a smokescreen for neofascism and a totalitarian state. In short, they see it as a "kill freedom to save it" scam. They believe that after this second revolution the only worldview that will be allowed to exist is yours. All freedom of speech, religion, press, and due process will be destroyed in the name of saving it. In short, some even interpret it as a Christian theocracy.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Well, since Boxer is extremely to the left, to her it looks like Palin is extremely to the right.
I'm not sure about how talking about her family values and fighting political corruption is anywhere as extreme as the amount of disgusting criticism she receives from even just the mainstream.
jowildcat40 2 years ago
Palin lied to this nation on her Facebook page about the creation of a death panel in the Obama health care reform proposal. She's earned all the criticism she gets; frankly the mainstream criticism she's getting is too easy.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Sarah Palin took on corruption in Alaska and her enemies there put people up to harassing her. The liberals have spent untold millions to discredit her.
Barbara Boxer is likely in the pocket of special interest groups. Global warming is a huge fraud. Many companies are set up to profit greatly from a cap and trade bill.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Liberals don't need to discredit Sarah Palin. Palin is a pathological liar who tried to deceiver the American people on her Facebook page by falsely claiming Obama's health care proposal would establish a death panel to decide whether her Down's Syndrome baby and parents would live. She tried to decive the American people and got caught. The woman is a moral fraud and a political menace.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
If Sarah Palin lied, then what did Obama remove from the bill that they talked about in the news for days? And how could she lie about that Obama claims has never been written yet? You are a liar and an Obama-bot POS. Obama is a pathalogical liar, as is Pelosi and most other demoncrats.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
There was nothing about a death panel in that bill to begin with. Sen. Grassley pushed to change was the langauge of voluntary living will counselling and other optional end of life provisions. There was NEVER one sentence in any version of that bill creating a panel of officials who'd decide who lives and who dies. You are the one lying and your own words prove it. If you had to ask what Obama removed from the bill then you didn't know in the first place. You and Palin stand as proven liars.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
"MyTruths" are exactly that - your own. Republican lawmakers like Charles Grassley admitted there was never a death panel in Sec. 1233 (the part Palin cites) of the health care bill. Yet by your own admission you never read it in the first place. You convicted yourself of intellectual dishonesty in the process. I suggest you get your factsa straight and do your own research before parroting lying Christian fanatics like Sarah Pain.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
So, If Sarah Palin was lying, what was taken out of the bill and why was it taken out?
Barack Oliar is unqualified to be president he is a two bit con. You are an O-bot of his with no caring towards people other than you want the other guy to pay for your laziness. You are a loser!
MyTruths1 2 years ago
As Judge Judy would say, "Put your listening ears on!" I answered your question but you can't handle the facts here. First off, if a "death panel" was once in the bill you could prove it because all earlier versions of the bill are a matter of public record. Palin cited Sec. 1233 of the earlier version and sadly there was no death panel there to be found. The only thing Grassley and others pushed to change was Sec. 1233's wording about voluntary end of life counselling - period.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
So, Answer the question. You will not because you are a lying democrat. You try to disguise your evil and lies as good for "poor" and "misfortunate" people.
The fact is: Sarah Palin is a good, honest, great American. Something you are not.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Your question was answered. You're now changing the issue here. There never was any death panel in Sec. 1233 of Obama's bill. That's a proven lie, and you can't make it stick by just repeating it. How am I evil by pointing out a fact? Someone's evil was uncovered here, but it was not mine. You're disgusing your evil in the name of "honesty" and 'goodness." You've been caught in a lie and now you're trying snake out of it by raising other issues. You're caught, face it.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You are a typical lying democrat. Oliar did have a provision removed. The news covered it. It was the talk for a week. What you are denying was basically a death panel. You are mincing on words. As an O-bot that is what you do. Your whole ideology is wrong and all anyone has to do to see it is look at California. It is a cesspool of democrats that have transformed a beautiful state into a haven for illegals that are ruining our country. Sarah Palin is great!!!!!!!!
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Just who's mincing words here? There's no such thing as "basically a death panel." No version of Sec. 1233 ever gave anyone the power to decide who lives or who dies. Palin lied about that intentionally. As I told you before, the change you're referring to was the langauge of the voluntary living will counselling. I'm aware of that change, that's the one I've been talking about. Also as I said before all previous versions of the bill are a matter of public record. There's no death panel period.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You're trying to cover up Palin's lie by telling lies of your own. The original langauge of the Obama bill had nothing remotely resembling a death panel. Even Republican Sen. Charles Grassley and Republican pundits admit that Palin was dead wrong. No provision of that bill *ever* empowered *anyone to decide who lives and who dies. You're so caught up in Palin's cult of personality that you can't see she's a filthy liar. She was making it all up and so, sadly, are you.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You are a typical liberal democrat. You lie for money. You lie for power. You never represent what you are supposed to be representing. Earlier you claimed that I said I had not read the bill. You are a damn liar! I did not say any such thing. You attack Sarah Palin because she is honest and for the people. She does not have any big money backing her. Your stench reminds me of Nancy Pelosi....all lies and deceit. Sarah Palin was right about the death panel. Nothing was removed?
MyTruths1 2 years ago
You admitted you didn't know what was in the bill. That means you didn't read it, and that means you're a liar or an ignoramus if you make claims about what's in there when you said it contained a death panel. It never did at any time since it was introduced. There's no death panel and there never was. Palin is lying, and so are you. Everyone reading our exchange sees you for what you are. There's no death panel and there never was.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
And while I'm at it.... Sarah Palin is a beautiful person. You remind me of bat puke.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Boxer is a butt ugly dog that should get some plastic surgery as has Nancy Pelosi. At minimum she needs to put a hell of a lot more makeup on, which she sorely needs!
MyTruths1 2 years ago
A beautiful person doesn't try to deceive a whole nation. You and Palin are cut from the same cloth. When caught in a lie, you tell another lie. You're caught with your hand in the cookie jar. Deal with it. Most people aren't buying her lies anymore. Sadly, you're so caught up in her cult of personality that you can't see the cold hard fact: the death panel is a fiction. Do you know what the word fiction means? It means fake, not real...sort of like your moral center.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You are a typical liberal damn liar. You fabricated a statement. First you claimed I said I did not read it. That is a lie. Now you are saying I admitted I did not know what was in it. That is a lie. Answer the question. If there was nothing that could be construed as a death panel then what has been in the news that was removed after Sarah Palin's comments? Tell me another lie or dodge the question. That is what liars do. You remind me of that hag Boxer. If you are in Cal - stay there
MyTruths1 2 years ago
You didn't know what was in it so that proves you never read it. That's not fabrication of anything - it's deduction. If your read it you would have known what was in it and no death panel was there. Palin lied and you''re in denial. You're trying to save a liar by becoming a liar yourself. You didn't even know about Sec. 1233 until I mentioned it otherwise you would've cited the "death panel" langauge verbatim to prove me wrong. You didn't, and that proves my case. There was nothing to cite.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Your question was answered before on this string but you're willfuly ignoring it and that's a form of lying too. Lying seems to come naturally to you. I'll answer it again. The provision in the news was the wording of voluntary living will counselling that Sen. Grassley wanted changed. He and all the other Republicans in Congress admit there was *never* any death panel. So answer my question: Are all the Republicans in Congress and the RNC liars too now because they say Pain was wrong?
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Sarah Palin talks straight. That is one of the reasons liberals hate her. For you to say I am cut from the same cloth is a huge compliment to me.....THANK YOU! I am starting to like you after that statement!
If you want to be a part of socialism, then why don't you move to a socialist country and leave the United States? If this socialized medicine is so great, why is it imploding in Canada? I think it would be great if you moved to France. Mexico would be fine for you too.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Palin talks straight if your definition of straight is the motion of a sidewinder rattlesnake. You and Palin defend your lies by using morality and patriotism as a cover. Palin lied to the American people she supposedly loves. That's called the "Big Lie" tactic - Hitler used it with great success. As far as Canada's health care imploding, that's just conservative propaganda. There's no big movement in Canada to abolish it. Palin lied and got caught red-handed. You're in denial - deal with it.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You will lie about anything to get your agenda approved. The outgoing president of the CMA criticized it too. I have relatives that live 4 miles from the Canadian Border for many years and they say they have never heard one good word about the Canadian medical system from any of their Canadian friends. You are in denial. I wonder just how you are set to benefit from this government takeover of private industry. You have the stench of a lying far left liberal democrat.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
You're the one lying here. In fact, you're playing a game of "musical lies." The death panel never existed, and that's a fact. There's no government takeover of private industry either in the health care bill either, and that's a fact. Not one person in the health care industry will be required to work for the government - not one. You're the proven lair here, because you're making things up as you go along. Your death panel lie isn't sticking so you try another lie.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
I am kicking your ass in this battle! If we were face to face you would be wimpering for your mommy! You have lied repeatedly and I have came back with the truths. You are a democrat and therefore want everything government controlled. That is not what the constituion and this country is all about. So, now I am going to be paing for these tattoo freaks, drug addicts, alcoholics, daredevils, idiots mistakes and poor lifestyles because thats what people like YOU want. No way!
MyTruths1 2 years ago
You're doing nothing but exposing yourself to be a pathological liar. You don't know what you're talking about; all you're doing is parroting right-wing propaganda a la Rush Limbaugh and other brainless talking heads. You don't know how to do your own thinking, let alone your own research.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Our government is bankrupt now. Our democratic president adn democrat controlled congress have spent about double what will be taken if for the year. Now you idiots want to keep spending a lot more. The mistake of electing Obama will linger to diminish America forever. A harsh learning experience that emphasizes the importance of the responsibility individuals have in a representative democracy. Now our only hope is that we can decelerate the headlong destruction occurring in America.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
You sound like a prerecorded message after the play button is pushed. Health care costs under the greedy private industry moguls have risen three times faster than wages over the last ten years. that means individual responsibility counts for nothing. This steep increase in costs is beyond the control of most individuals. As far as deficit spending goes, the Republicans rationalized it in the name of national security. The moral of the story is clear: one excuse is as good as another.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Medical Technology....has doubled approximately every six years and will continue to do so without government intervention (which means the same as government corruption). Because technology reasearch, patents, equipment costs money, naturally the costs have gone up. Please go back and read what I just wrote again before continuing any further. . It is a fact. Now try to digest that. Granted, there could be reforms with the system in place with a prime example being tort reform.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
You just shot yourself in the foot chief . If what you're saying is true then you just explained *why* capitalism doesn't work in health care. You're making this too easy.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You probably claim that there will be no rationing under national health care too.
Anyone who says that is a liar.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
Wake up ace, we're rationing health care in this country now. The private industry underwriters you worship already call the shots over which procedures get funded and how much they're funded. Get your head out of the sand. We're already there. You're not very informed about too much are you. The national health care bill has no rationing provisions at all. You're grasping at straws now.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You are such an evil, lying individual. Your blatant, brazen lies remind me of Nancy Pelosi. I have decided you have to be either Nancy Pelosi or Barbara Boxer. We do not have health care rationing right now. Get your head out of your ass!
MyTruths1 2 years ago
The only liar here is you. You've defended a liar who said the Obama health care reform contained a death panel to decide if sick children and old people would live or die. No such panel ever existed in that bill. And yes, we do have rationing now. The private companies decide what treatments they will authorize and what they won't. They routinely refuse to pay for MRIs and CAT scans despite doctor's orders. Private companies can ration care as easy as the government can.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
I answered your question, so why won't you answer mine. Why does the Republicans in Congress and thr RNC admit there was never any death panel in Obama's bill? Moreover, if the Canadian health care system is so rotten then why didn't the Canadians vote it out years ago?
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
You never did answer my question because you can't. The Canadians are too stupid to raise hell enough. They lost their gun rights too. They hate that and have never gotten them back. It is a problem primarily they have with one province dictating what others do, just like in the US.. People from DC imposing their will on others. I'm in Montana. We had the feds force wolves on our state against our will. The morons hurt our state badly with that move. We should have fought it more.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
I answered your question twice already. I'll answer it again. The provision removed from the health care reform bill simply allowed people to bill Medicare for *voluntary* living will counselling. That's it. That langauge gave nobody, I repeat, nobody the power to decide who lives and who dies. Even all the Republicans in Congress admitted that. Conservative Charles Krauthammer even said Sarah Palin should leave the room for the rest of the health care debate. She lied to America - deal with it.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
I say you are lying again. So, if it had nothing that could be construed as a death panel, then why did they remove it? Actually, I would like a death panel if I could be on it. Sarah Palin did not lie about it and I have heard many people who political analysts defend what she said. She does not have big money interests backing her. It comes from her heart. She is a true great American. It is obvious by now that I have owned you on this subject and Sarah Palin owns you too.
MyTruths1 2 years ago
You're the one laying because you're deliberately ignoring the facts. The only thing removed was a provision allowing Medicare to fund voluntary living will advice. There was nothing in there that could even remotely be construed as a death panel. A death panel makes the final decision who lives or dies - period . Living will advising just informs patients what choices the patients have in a living will - choice the patients themselves make and not the government. There's no fine line on this.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
No political analyist currently believes there ever was a death panel. Sarah Palin and you are using McCarthyite tactics to make your case. McCarthy made false accusations until they'd stick. Palin and you own one thing only : dishonor. Joe Welch's words apply well to you two: "Have you no sense of decency." Sen. Grassley, another snake, knew the Republicans got caught in a lie. The uneditied Sec. 1233 is still public record. You won't find anything remotely resembling a death panel.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Let me explain the difference between a death panel since the concept eludes you. A death panel makes arbitrary life and death decisions. If a patient comes before a death panel the governenment officals on the panel have the final word - live or die. Under the Sec. 1233 provision that was removed Medicare simply would've funded advice for living wills, leaving the patient with the final decision. Chuck Grassly knew his party was caught in a lie so he and his snakes had to cover their tracks.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
There never was a Sec. 1233 death panel provision. Palin put that section up on her Facebook page as proof but the fact is there was never even one word about a group of officials who would decide who's fit to live. Nobody was going to kill off her Down's Syndrome baby or her parents - nobody. You bill yourself as MyTruth but facts are as disposable to you as tissue paper. And how do you know I'm lazy or uncaring? Don't you see you're just making things up as you're going along?!? That is bad.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Boxer is a shill for the CORPORATE Collective. Global warming is a scientific hoax, another fabrication of pretext for social, political & military action, used so often by ruling elites to gain the sanction of the people. It's not surprising Sarah Palin was out maneuvered when the press & those who manipulate the currency came against her. In my view, Boxer is a radical - an emotional terrorist who exploits the commodification of natural shifts in weather patterns, as covert political currency.
Eliezer18 2 years ago
Ha! What a howler! Right wingers complaining about elitism. Brush up on your history - conservatism since the time of Edmund Burke has been a defense of elitism, not an attack on it. The essence of conservative thought up until about 30 years ago was the people are too stupid to know what's good for them and now the Right is co-opting the langauge of the loony Left in the 60s. Where do you think "Power to the People" came from? Laura Inbredham? Why do you think Nixon himself used it? Sheeshh...
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
All CORPORATE CARTEL MONOPOLISTS are LEFT-WING regressive COLLECTIVISTS. Rockefeller, the Bush faction & I.G.FARBEN, the German CARTEL of "like interests" - a monopoly cartel, were/are all LEFT-WING regressive SOCIALISTS. They are SOCIAL DARWINISTS who believe in the survival of the "fittest" & "practical" EUGENICS, as a means of culling the herd. COLLECTIVISM can be either CORPORATE as in ROCKEFELLER, or ideological, as in STALIN. COLLECTIVISM postures with moral currency, "left" or "right."
Eliezer18 2 years ago
Yes, I was a salesman for that back when I was a member of the John Birch Society. The problem is two opposite concepts are being blended in your case. Collectivism and Social Darwinism seek different results. Collectivism tries to make everyone a socioeconomic equal; Social Darwinism runs on "whoever dies with the most toys wins." Ideally under full collectivism neither a Rockefeller or a dead homeless man would exist. Under Social Darwinism the richest man is the ideal man.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
All top down authoritarian power structures, are LEFT-WING regressive. What IS "progessive," is the American notion of a Constitutional Republic, wherein human beings are assured the unlienable rights to life, liberty & property, including ones most personal item of property, the fruits of ones labor. In the Hegelian dialetic, conventional notions of right/left are flip-sides of the same good-guy, bad-guy routine. Hitler knew he could easily mold "brown" Nazis from "red" Collectivist Communists.
Eliezer18 2 years ago
Well, I guess I made my point that Collectivism and Social Darwinism are opposites. As to the poly spectrum you're using I'm familiar with it. The Birchers use it, and the far Right of that spectrum is anarchism - no government.. That spectrum isn't used in political discourse; a derivative of the Left/Right seating of the French Legislative Assembly of 1791-92 is used. I'm also aware of ex-Reds becoming Nazis - they were called "beefsteak Nazis" (red on the inside, brown on the outside).
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
This may or may not come as a shock, but the notion of inalienable rights is largely discredited in not only academic circles but among the masses in general. Utilitarians did a hatchet job on the natural law ideal of God-given rights by the 1820s. Even conservatives like Robert Bork reject the notion of inalienable rights and natural law as total fictions.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
Robert Bork is incorrect. Natural law is not a FICTION. All... "COLOR-OF-LAW," LEGAL PERSONAS, CORPORATE ENTITIES & LEGAL PERSONAS are FICTIONS. As John Quincy Adams puts it, "those things which appear to be, but are not." And the word is "un"lienable." The government shall place no "lien," against the labor or wages of a man. Thus, the un'lienable" right to life, liberty & property, three rights not available to the common man in the old world. America is the New World, not the New World Odor.
Eliezer18 2 years ago
Yes, I'm no fan of Robert Bork either. Guys like him screwed up the conservative movement. he was one of the most intellectually dishonest wretches of the late 20th century. Natural law is mentioned in the Declaration of Independence itself and what does he do? He disposes of natural law by arguing the Declaration is evil and the source of our problems. Bork is utilitarian in his view of rights; he thinks they're mere creations of society and thus disposable by society at will. Bork the neocon..
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
boxer is out of the human main stream a real dysfunctional liberal ass clown
obamaassclown1 2 years ago
boxer and pelosi are liberal nut jobs both have mental conditions real goof balls
obamaassclown1 2 years ago
Sarah Palin didn't understand the job of V.P
Sarah Palin didn't understand the 1st Amendment of the U.S Constitution
Sarah Palin didn't know why Hilary Clinton had Secret Service Protection from day one of the Democratic Primaries.
Sarah Palin couldn't name ONE newspaper she reads.
I could go on.
thank-Goodness that stupid bitch isn't one 70+ year olds heart away from the most powerful job in the world.
phantomeagle 2 years ago 2
Holla!!!
broadbent48 2 years ago
Amen to that! Sarah Palin and the rest of the Christian Right are destroying the Republican party and most of the spineless moderates in the GOP don't have the stones to point out what the real problem is here: a group of crazed theocrats who want to ram their perverted form of Christianity down our throats.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
My God!!!! The crazy bitch Boxer doesn't even realize she is the extremist.
When the extreme become dilusional we have a problem.
dogcrapgreen 2 years ago 2
Insert "Boxer" when she says "Palin" and that's how America feels about you, Babs.
robertm729 2 years ago
oh im sorry mam
scottdaddy 2 years ago
Boxer is right - Palin's vision of America resembles more of a Christian theocracy than a nation where all people are equal before the law.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
and Boxer's vision of Amerika looks like a Plantation
divanola 2 years ago 2
Frankly I see no comparison between a slave plantation and anything Boxer has ever proposed. That's just John Birch Society thinking and I know because I was a Bircher back in the 80s. Those arguments don't cut it anymore - people aren't buying it. You need some better conspiracy theories than that to scare people.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
if you were a Bircher at anytime you were a moron....hilarious: a "former Bircher" defending Barbra Boxcutter...go troll for the Obamanazi's elsewhere
divanola 2 years ago
Fear motivates people to do things they otherwise would not. People were paranoid about communism back then. We watched "Red Dawn" in those days and believed it. If I rejected the Birchite worldview long ago then it's hardly surprising that I'd defend Boxer. Moreover, the idea that Obama's supporters are Nazis is yet another example of Birchite-style thinking. Do you have a blue and cream white membership card in your wallet? Remember, Eisenhower really was a Communist! *grin*
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago
I'd like to throw a good solid hard punch at Barbara Boxer.
NoGuff 3 years ago 2
Governor Sarah Palin (R-AK) rocks! She lives her faith & has shown American women that you don't have to kill your own baby to live your dreams. God bless Sarah Palin, her family & friends & Alaska! Palin truly loves America & has a vision for what's best for our country.
GodEqualsLove4ever 3 years ago 2
Sarah Palin is a political train wreck who can't even govern the tiny population of Alaska. You anti-abortion peeps need to realize it's not the paramount issue in America. You also need to realize that people don't want to live in a Christian theocracy either - which is Palin's vision for what's best for our country in the view of many.
gallerian1fsf 2 years ago