@Olliek94 Obviously, but checkmate only came 11 moves after the fork. Did white seriously give up an immediate queen for only a *potential* checkmate many moves later? That's a big risk.
When I first looked at the combination, I assumed it would've been a really long game like a 2 hour game, but when I read that it was a 5 minute game, I was truly in awe!
top players regularly use computer like moves until they have control of the game or some tempo.This is a good example of being one step ahead.When the moves are forced the play is more likely to resemble a computers choice.Nice game by the way!!
Don't claim things that aren't yours as your own. Why doesn't youtube remove this video for copyright laws? Sure, you can steal an entire grand master chess game, but if you have half of a song in your video, then it gets taken down. Isn't youtube a bitch? >_<
That was actually a game played by Paul Morphy in the early 1900s. It's real nice of you for digging it up, but please don't claim it your own. Thank you.
Hell that can be his best chess Combination he Ever Played...because he learned it...and if he learnead it that well nice job my friend....the statement that are no 2 chess games one like the other is false because of modern chess learning...one advanced player with a good knowledge of chess history can make a genius game by remembering positions and games....
In the short run, it would put his knight in a poor position and take out one of blacks pieces that wont get in the game for a while. Since he obviously wanted to continue his attack, he choose to keep his knight on the offensive and keep its positional advantage.
3...dxc3 is clearly best. Black almost certainly emerges with the better game no matter what White tries. Entering into complicated positions is part of being a complete chess player. Avoiding sharp lines "because that's what my opponent wants" is silly. Play the best move, a la Fischer!
@Crabitat - I beg your pardon? A chess player having their own style and following that style is not, "complete rubbish". The best move is that which a chess player is most comfortable with, for a variety of reasons. Some players are comfortable with an attacking style, others with defending, others still with a combination of both to varying degree's, others with a positional style, others with a materialistic style, etc., etc.
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Until a player reaches master strength, allowing "style" to override correct moves is plain narcissism and a handicap to improvement. Of course, if mediocrity is acceptable in the pursuit of fun, then by all means players should do whatever they like.
@Crabitat - I can highly recommend the book, "Winning With Chess Psychology", by International Grandmaster Pal Benko. There is much to learn from this book. "The best move is the one that disturbs the opponent the most". Mikhail Tal was one of the greatest chess players of all time and World Champion. "Through their efforts, it has become accepted that there is...a subjective or perhaps psychological in chess which one cannot and indeed, should not, attempt to escape. I believe most ...
@JohnQuincyAdams1 i read that book 15+ years ago. Also I can recommend books by Krogius and Rowson for someone looking to see what goes on "behind the moves."
@Crabitat - I read it 20 years ago. So? My point is that chess is a lot more than just finding the absolute perfect move all the time, playing like a computer. Again, a human being is not a computer.
@Crabitat - I wasn't being rude at all, merely pointing out your unfriendly, unbecoming condescending arrogance. Psychology in chess is no a theory, but a documented fact, as many great Grandmasters agree. Good luck with your inferiority complex and personality.
@Crabitat ...definitely that one must not only grapple with problems on the board;", (as you suggest), "one must also make every effort to combat the thoughts and will of the opponent". Tal won the World Championship not by playing moves a computer would say are, "the best", but by using moves that disturbed his opponents the most, which you apparently term as a, "blunder". A successful chess player doesn't use computer moves, as they aren't playing a computer, but a human being. Good luck.
@JohnQuincyAdams1 And when you have Tal's ability, you can of course "break the rules." For weak players to try to do the same is usually hubristic at best. In the heat of battle, the struggle to win is indeed everything. And the surest way to win is to play the best move. :-) Good luck!
@Crabitat - Tal wasn't the only great chess player to realize that one doesn't need to find the, "best move", all the time. If you feel Tal had such ability, then he would have used the, "best move", all the time, but he didn't, making many attacks that were unsound, (as he admitted), but was the correct psychological move at the time, for that opponent, for that game. Emanuel Lasker, Bobby Fischer, Pal Benko, etc., etc. These highly accomplished and respected Grandmasters are correct.
@JohnQuincyAdams1 LOL. Nice use of a sleazy debate tactic. Falsely claiming I disagree with famous GMs to bolster your case. Yes, those grandmasters ARE correct. Here is a quote by the aforementioned Bobby Fischer - “I don't believe in psychology. I believe in good moves.”
Enjoy your style of chess. Good luck in your future endeavors. Peace out.
@Crabitat - Any debate was lost by you long ago, as with the quotes from Grandmasters I supplied have proven you wrong. I know it's difficult for someone with a self-confidence problem to face that, but facts are facts I'm afraid. Good luck to you.
@Crabitat - "Winning With Chess Psychology", by International Grandmaster Pal Benko - "Even today there are players - though not at the highest levels - who would choose the same plan in the same position no matter who the opponent or what the circumstances. There is much to be said for finding the objective 'truth' in a position, the objectively 'best' move. The trouble is: given two identical positions, the move that is best against player A in the first round of a tournament may not be...
@Crabitat ...the best against Player B in the last round. Once you accept the logic of this argument, as you must, you are ready to appreciate the often decisive role that psychological factors play in chess".
@sajjan00001 - Is English your second language? You seem to be having severe problems with spelling. No one appreciates the childish, vulgar and profane verbal vomit language either. Thank you.
The opening is a mixture of the smith morra gambit and the the danish gambit. If these were two GM's then they both sucked really bad at the opening. This would never work against someone who knew how to play against the smith-morra gambit. Neither of the two players are a GM, and that is certain.
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Not De-fanged or refuted with d3. It's just another line you can play to decline the gambit. His main mistake wasn't even accepting your pawns in the gambit. Nc6 was his main downfall. He should have played a6 first not allowing you to post your N up on b5 attacking his queen and opening up your dark squared B. Also he played a few moves prior to that that didn't make much sense. He gave up on development and became a punching bag because of it. He was probably a patzer!
@BlizzGMX - I have found that for black to play 3...d3, causes substantial problems for white, as the move jams up white's normal queenside development, with the queenside knight's normal development hampered. Meanwhile, black retains the two very strong central pawns vs white's one central pawn. After 3...d3, black just develops normally with the Sicilian Defense and the Smith-Morra Gambit suddenly finds itself with the tables turned on it, i.e. de-fanged.
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Yeah it changes the opening quite a bit, but it is pretty equal as far as position and piece development goes. It is called declining the gambit, but it doesn't refute the opening, or force a win for either color. Just a less attractive pawn structure for a tactical minded player. A positional player would easily maneuver his way to equality.
@BlizzGMX - Maybe not equal, but at least better than black swallowing the hook of the Smith Morra Gambit by 3...dxc, or developing another piece and allowing white to play 4.cxd, with black losing the advantage of the strong two center pawns vs white's one center pawn. With 3...d3, black is behind a tempo, but again, I've found it to be better than the alternatives, at least long term. Black has to play carefully and develop quickly to equalize. It does throw off white's game though.
@BlizzGMX -By the way, I figured this move out myself in a tournament game and I saw that if I left the d pawn where it was, white would just take it with cxd and have two center pawns vs my two center pawns, as well as also enjoying an open c-file. If I took with 3...cxd, then white develops their queenside knight to a good location and my position is definitely weaker. When I analyzed 3...d3, I entered it into a database and found Grandmasters play this move, giving it their stamp of approval.
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Yes, but GM's don't usually play the smith morra gambit. It is not sound to sacrifice that pawn. The best move is to accept the Gambit. Enter it into a chess computer and you will notice black usually comes out with the advantage. It is a nice opening to play with club players or players with lower level ratings, but it wouldn't be wise to try it against a GM. I am a little over 2000 USCF and I rarely see this opening. It could work up to the 2200's, but a GM would smash it.
@BlizzGMX - Correct, as the Smith Morra Gambit is indeed unsound. It's generally now used by lower rated players who think they are pulling some kind of neat trick. Either materially, (as you point out), or positionally, (as I pointed out), it can be defeated with correct play. I've been playing chess for over 30 years and long-term positional play, (with the ability to see it, i.e. someone like Anatoly Karpov), can carry the day. :)
@JohnQuincyAdams1 well GL in your future chess expeditions. It was a nice combo taking advantage of your opponents mistakes swiftly. I like to sac my queen for a challenge too. Sometimes it is better to toss her into trouble than sit around and wait it out! have a nice day.
Do not label this man as a liar, without proof. Years ago I played a man and won with SAME MOVES as Morphy did in his famous game against the the 2 aristocrats in the Opera in Paris. I myself couldn't believe it, but it did happen. And sooner or later it might happen to any of you who presently accuse this guy. What then? Will you be the first to come back and apologize? Highly unlikely. So please refrain from baseless accusations. - Cheers.
You guys are saying its not him who is playing, but i hardly can believe this are 2 grandmasters, a king/queen fork with a knight? A nice combination but black plays to very passive. This is way to fancy for 2 grandmasters, and if it isthe game is posted somewhere on internet, so give me the urls please......
Having fun with stealing people's game and tell that it's yours? I just analysed the game, this isn't even the original one, Zohar Dror Vs. Daniel Perelman 2006, slightly edited...
Definitely one of the sickest check mates i have ever seen!! By move 10 white is ahead in material, but after move 12 Na6 black should have just resign, the game was lost...
What the fuck happened at 0:40 after Qa4? why the fuck black initiated Qc6? for what? how about Nxc4? this is a great game? you must be playing with a fiver year old kid you fucking jack ass. Go play your xbox
@siiiixiiiin1 then Nd6xQe4? it seems worse. can you explain it? what the continuation? why not Qg4? are you thinking for yourself or analyze it with computer? cos my computer (gnu chess), I set it to 0:40 position, he play as black, make the same move as the video, except after white Ng5, black Ng6 (didn't eat the queen). i think this combination is great and you're just a big mouth motherfucker!!!
tbh i think Kasparov should be nr 1. Bobby fischer? Mostly americans would think he was best. And i guess its time to move Magnus Carlsen into the list ^^
Hi ChessNerdFighter , your moves are excellent. Black makes many wrong moves. For example once white puts its queen from B3 to A4, why did'nt black move its horse from A5 to C6. Rather it movesE4 to C6. Its a wrong move..
Wow... nice sacrifice! And you say you did that in a 5 minute game? Did you calculate it out beforehand or just hope it would work because it looked like you had a decent attack going?
why didnt black knight take e5 bishop? He would have lost a rook but would have had a chance of checking king and perhaps mating...? (omg mating sounds wrong)
This is a great match. I have tried the Smith Morra gambit in tourneys, but I usually play the wrong moves and get crushed. This video should be a great resource to look at. Thanks a lot :)
Your doing the moves too fast..I lost interest.
brindow1 2 days ago
lol this is not even chess, its only wood pushing everywhere like rookies.. even at the beginning, right first moves, white loses a pawn lol (dk)
estiedesacrament 1 week ago
At 0.34 you had the queen pinned. Why not simply take it?
b3rkut 1 week ago
@b3rkut Because a checkmate is better than the win of a queen...
Olliek94 4 days ago
@Olliek94 Obviously, but checkmate only came 11 moves after the fork. Did white seriously give up an immediate queen for only a *potential* checkmate many moves later? That's a big risk.
b3rkut 4 days ago
@b3rkut the goal of chess is not to gain material, the point of chess is to win the game by checkmating the king.
syeddawdye747 2 days ago
nice combination
Norbert66676667 1 month ago
Black plays blunder move but you play better than blunder move
Sothat you must win
GunzpeeZ 1 month ago
In this moment is when somebody says "LOL".
juliano6010 1 month ago
Was ...Qc6 after Qa4 really necessary or just a blunder? Brilliant combination though, Ng5 after ...b6 was wonderful!
WEITESTAL 1 month ago
you sacrificed the queen?! your own wife?! for victory?!?? I dont know how you could truly accept this as a victory...
revelthehunter 2 months ago 8
boss.
stokasm3 2 months ago
To take is a mistake.
hoffness 3 months ago
When I first looked at the combination, I assumed it would've been a really long game like a 2 hour game, but when I read that it was a 5 minute game, I was truly in awe!
Matthew2400 3 months ago
That's a Danish Gambit, right?
supermec131 3 months ago
My favorite opening with white too
realhummel 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
google "gambitking" to play online chess
tillytally2101 4 months ago
top players regularly use computer like moves until they have control of the game or some tempo.This is a good example of being one step ahead.When the moves are forced the play is more likely to resemble a computers choice.Nice game by the way!!
guy92239 4 months ago
0:53 wouldn't Rb1+ first be better? Since it would more likely lead to a mate in 2
subrosian 4 months ago
Aside from silly opponent moves, well done.
TheDivineWinds 5 months ago
risky but good job
twistypuzzler3646 5 months ago
wonderful
leofrost1 5 months ago
beautiful
PROTLxONgame 5 months ago
cool combination
unholyaquarius 5 months ago
What site u play?? ANd which ur nick ? hugs
davidnegreira 6 months ago
Wow how moves ahead was that thought out ? i could never do that.. =(
1Deejay7 6 months ago
It's not your game! this is a grandmaster's game! THIEF!
YtubeUserr 6 months ago 2
Comment removed
Rboysblaster 6 months ago
hahahaha wicked! like your style crazy :D
NetApostle 6 months ago
I LIKE THIS MOVE.
people460 6 months ago
nice
dollarusa9801 6 months ago
are you a fucking genius? you play like a gm, and to see such a variation in a 5 minute game... thats awesome
sauskeuchiwa 6 months ago
can u give a reaction about this one?
melyjoy1 6 months ago
nice one
HardieUK 7 months ago
Don't claim things that aren't yours as your own. Why doesn't youtube remove this video for copyright laws? Sure, you can steal an entire grand master chess game, but if you have half of a song in your video, then it gets taken down. Isn't youtube a bitch? >_<
chester10999 8 months ago 3
That was actually a game played by Paul Morphy in the early 1900s. It's real nice of you for digging it up, but please don't claim it your own. Thank you.
Drakozap 8 months ago 5
@Drakozap Paul Morphy died in 1884
ytmndman 7 months ago
@ytmndman
Oops sorry my bad the late 1800s then
Drakozap 7 months ago
nicely done
wallofdeath123 8 months ago
nice!! I wish one day I can play like this :D
packman812able 8 months ago
Beautiful
CurtisRoxYerSox 8 months ago
Hell that can be his best chess Combination he Ever Played...because he learned it...and if he learnead it that well nice job my friend....the statement that are no 2 chess games one like the other is false because of modern chess learning...one advanced player with a good knowledge of chess history can make a genius game by remembering positions and games....
kokainhigh 9 months ago
That wanst you...
FancoiseT 9 months ago
They are the real grandmasters who scarifies queen before several moves like Morphy.
rhyne222 9 months ago
the end position is prety to see: b and n are together. But DON T SAY THAT IS YOUR PLAYING.
antonin696969 9 months ago
that was pretty sick, nicely done!
pliestifolife 10 months ago
Wow crabitat, and jonquincyadams1 need to get a new hobby I think... If chess ever makes me argue like that I'm giving it up lol : (
TheBlacksiphon 10 months ago
exellent moves
rilinddd 10 months ago
this is from chessmaster challange
yummy791 10 months ago
I have to wonder why the knight didn't take the rook when he had it forked with the king. :35
0negative82 10 months ago
@0negative82
This move is better for longer games.
In the short run, it would put his knight in a poor position and take out one of blacks pieces that wont get in the game for a while. Since he obviously wanted to continue his attack, he choose to keep his knight on the offensive and keep its positional advantage.
Less aggressive players should take the rook.
AlargePotato 10 months ago
@0negative82 Becouse it is more important to make mate, than to win material.
Kimmo788 9 months ago
if you really played that, good job
hazmatac 10 months ago
wow
lenardsergio 11 months ago
@mysteryg - Human beings are subject to psychological factors, of course. Computers are not. Fact.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
3...dxc3 is clearly best. Black almost certainly emerges with the better game no matter what White tries. Entering into complicated positions is part of being a complete chess player. Avoiding sharp lines "because that's what my opponent wants" is silly. Play the best move, a la Fischer!
Crabitat 11 months ago
@Crabitat - The best move is only the best move if it fits into the player's individual style.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 2
@JohnQuincyAdams1 of course that is complete rubbish. you are conflating "best" with "emotionally satisfying."
Until you reach 2400, your "style" is really just a tendency to blunder in typical ways.
Crabitat 11 months ago
@Crabitat - I beg your pardon? A chess player having their own style and following that style is not, "complete rubbish". The best move is that which a chess player is most comfortable with, for a variety of reasons. Some players are comfortable with an attacking style, others with defending, others still with a combination of both to varying degree's, others with a positional style, others with a materialistic style, etc., etc.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 3
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Until a player reaches master strength, allowing "style" to override correct moves is plain narcissism and a handicap to improvement. Of course, if mediocrity is acceptable in the pursuit of fun, then by all means players should do whatever they like.
Crabitat 11 months ago
@Crabitat - I can highly recommend the book, "Winning With Chess Psychology", by International Grandmaster Pal Benko. There is much to learn from this book. "The best move is the one that disturbs the opponent the most". Mikhail Tal was one of the greatest chess players of all time and World Champion. "Through their efforts, it has become accepted that there is...a subjective or perhaps psychological in chess which one cannot and indeed, should not, attempt to escape. I believe most ...
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 3
@JohnQuincyAdams1 i read that book 15+ years ago. Also I can recommend books by Krogius and Rowson for someone looking to see what goes on "behind the moves."
Crabitat 11 months ago
@Crabitat - I read it 20 years ago. So? My point is that chess is a lot more than just finding the absolute perfect move all the time, playing like a computer. Again, a human being is not a computer.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 2
Comment removed
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 lol... I was just saying I had read the book you recommended. No need to be rude. Good luck with your theories.
Crabitat 11 months ago
@Crabitat - I wasn't being rude at all, merely pointing out your unfriendly, unbecoming condescending arrogance. Psychology in chess is no a theory, but a documented fact, as many great Grandmasters agree. Good luck with your inferiority complex and personality.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@Crabitat ...definitely that one must not only grapple with problems on the board;", (as you suggest), "one must also make every effort to combat the thoughts and will of the opponent". Tal won the World Championship not by playing moves a computer would say are, "the best", but by using moves that disturbed his opponents the most, which you apparently term as a, "blunder". A successful chess player doesn't use computer moves, as they aren't playing a computer, but a human being. Good luck.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 13
@JohnQuincyAdams1 And when you have Tal's ability, you can of course "break the rules." For weak players to try to do the same is usually hubristic at best. In the heat of battle, the struggle to win is indeed everything. And the surest way to win is to play the best move. :-) Good luck!
Crabitat 11 months ago
@Crabitat - Tal wasn't the only great chess player to realize that one doesn't need to find the, "best move", all the time. If you feel Tal had such ability, then he would have used the, "best move", all the time, but he didn't, making many attacks that were unsound, (as he admitted), but was the correct psychological move at the time, for that opponent, for that game. Emanuel Lasker, Bobby Fischer, Pal Benko, etc., etc. These highly accomplished and respected Grandmasters are correct.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 6
@JohnQuincyAdams1 LOL. Nice use of a sleazy debate tactic. Falsely claiming I disagree with famous GMs to bolster your case. Yes, those grandmasters ARE correct. Here is a quote by the aforementioned Bobby Fischer - “I don't believe in psychology. I believe in good moves.”
Enjoy your style of chess. Good luck in your future endeavors. Peace out.
Crabitat 11 months ago
@Crabitat - Any debate was lost by you long ago, as with the quotes from Grandmasters I supplied have proven you wrong. I know it's difficult for someone with a self-confidence problem to face that, but facts are facts I'm afraid. Good luck to you.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@Crabitat - "Winning With Chess Psychology", by International Grandmaster Pal Benko - "Even today there are players - though not at the highest levels - who would choose the same plan in the same position no matter who the opponent or what the circumstances. There is much to be said for finding the objective 'truth' in a position, the objectively 'best' move. The trouble is: given two identical positions, the move that is best against player A in the first round of a tournament may not be...
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 2
@Crabitat ...the best against Player B in the last round. Once you accept the logic of this argument, as you must, you are ready to appreciate the often decisive role that psychological factors play in chess".
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago 2
@sajjan00001 - Is English your second language? You seem to be having severe problems with spelling. No one appreciates the childish, vulgar and profane verbal vomit language either. Thank you.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
The opening is a mixture of the smith morra gambit and the the danish gambit. If these were two GM's then they both sucked really bad at the opening. This would never work against someone who knew how to play against the smith-morra gambit. Neither of the two players are a GM, and that is certain.
BlizzGMX 11 months ago
@BlizzGMX - The Smith-Morra Gambit can be totally de-fanged with 3....d3.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Not De-fanged or refuted with d3. It's just another line you can play to decline the gambit. His main mistake wasn't even accepting your pawns in the gambit. Nc6 was his main downfall. He should have played a6 first not allowing you to post your N up on b5 attacking his queen and opening up your dark squared B. Also he played a few moves prior to that that didn't make much sense. He gave up on development and became a punching bag because of it. He was probably a patzer!
BlizzGMX 11 months ago
@BlizzGMX - I have found that for black to play 3...d3, causes substantial problems for white, as the move jams up white's normal queenside development, with the queenside knight's normal development hampered. Meanwhile, black retains the two very strong central pawns vs white's one central pawn. After 3...d3, black just develops normally with the Sicilian Defense and the Smith-Morra Gambit suddenly finds itself with the tables turned on it, i.e. de-fanged.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Yeah it changes the opening quite a bit, but it is pretty equal as far as position and piece development goes. It is called declining the gambit, but it doesn't refute the opening, or force a win for either color. Just a less attractive pawn structure for a tactical minded player. A positional player would easily maneuver his way to equality.
BlizzGMX 11 months ago
@BlizzGMX - Maybe not equal, but at least better than black swallowing the hook of the Smith Morra Gambit by 3...dxc, or developing another piece and allowing white to play 4.cxd, with black losing the advantage of the strong two center pawns vs white's one center pawn. With 3...d3, black is behind a tempo, but again, I've found it to be better than the alternatives, at least long term. Black has to play carefully and develop quickly to equalize. It does throw off white's game though.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@BlizzGMX -By the way, I figured this move out myself in a tournament game and I saw that if I left the d pawn where it was, white would just take it with cxd and have two center pawns vs my two center pawns, as well as also enjoying an open c-file. If I took with 3...cxd, then white develops their queenside knight to a good location and my position is definitely weaker. When I analyzed 3...d3, I entered it into a database and found Grandmasters play this move, giving it their stamp of approval.
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 Yes, but GM's don't usually play the smith morra gambit. It is not sound to sacrifice that pawn. The best move is to accept the Gambit. Enter it into a chess computer and you will notice black usually comes out with the advantage. It is a nice opening to play with club players or players with lower level ratings, but it wouldn't be wise to try it against a GM. I am a little over 2000 USCF and I rarely see this opening. It could work up to the 2200's, but a GM would smash it.
BlizzGMX 11 months ago
@BlizzGMX - Correct, as the Smith Morra Gambit is indeed unsound. It's generally now used by lower rated players who think they are pulling some kind of neat trick. Either materially, (as you point out), or positionally, (as I pointed out), it can be defeated with correct play. I've been playing chess for over 30 years and long-term positional play, (with the ability to see it, i.e. someone like Anatoly Karpov), can carry the day. :)
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
@JohnQuincyAdams1 well GL in your future chess expeditions. It was a nice combo taking advantage of your opponents mistakes swiftly. I like to sac my queen for a challenge too. Sometimes it is better to toss her into trouble than sit around and wait it out! have a nice day.
BlizzGMX 11 months ago
@BlizzGMX - "Winning With Chess Psychology", by International Grandmaster Pal Benko. Great book! :)
JohnQuincyAdams1 11 months ago
beautiful
MrBoymate 11 months ago
Do not label this man as a liar, without proof. Years ago I played a man and won with SAME MOVES as Morphy did in his famous game against the the 2 aristocrats in the Opera in Paris. I myself couldn't believe it, but it did happen. And sooner or later it might happen to any of you who presently accuse this guy. What then? Will you be the first to come back and apologize? Highly unlikely. So please refrain from baseless accusations. - Cheers.
lakoska 1 year ago
eh this is pretty rare IMO
Vball2718 11 months ago
Come on, guys, just because grandmasters played that game first doesn't mean he couldn't have coincidentally made all the same moves ;D
TheOpinionatedPerson 1 year ago
You guys are saying its not him who is playing, but i hardly can believe this are 2 grandmasters, a king/queen fork with a knight? A nice combination but black plays to very passive. This is way to fancy for 2 grandmasters, and if it isthe game is posted somewhere on internet, so give me the urls please......
RazRawSum 1 year ago
hey guys, it was me who did the Immortal game. if you were wondering. ;)
dancemaster999 1 year ago
wow nice one
yukonmtetwa 1 year ago
yeah you little liar, lol. But what a brilliant game :)
oryxfreeride 1 year ago
this is pretty sweet, wish I could see more than 3 moves in advance like that
liumeister 1 year ago
NICE! :)
egidello 1 year ago
LOL Clearly not you
shogundapker 1 year ago
how were you able to foresee the future on this game?
damthatriver09 1 year ago
Having fun with stealing people's game and tell that it's yours? I just analysed the game, this isn't even the original one, Zohar Dror Vs. Daniel Perelman 2006, slightly edited...
TheMReful 1 year ago
The Queen sacrifice was epic!
kiemul136 1 year ago
Liar! Thats not you playing, its a grand master game
nicocola1 1 year ago 3
this is basicaly like a danish gambit, very well played haha
danielelward 1 year ago
Amazing Sacrifice!!!
Xombigod 1 year ago
can u give the moves for this?? thx!! and nice vid!!
acelect 1 year ago
Thanks for the spectacular queen sacrifice! Keep it on!
Who did you play with?
igoregin2 1 year ago
Great victory!!! I am playing often sicillian, so after 3.c3 I always respond 3....d3!?
ocalan28 1 year ago
epic win
ghtuif 1 year ago
Nice! I did not see where this was going, at all.
nezpercenathan 1 year ago
Raaaaaaaape.
ubanare 1 year ago
wait so who won?
supertwichy7 1 year ago
Would this tactic change, at all, if black didn't make all those moves? In other words, can this be blocked?
Quikster220 1 year ago
@Quikster220 lol, of course it can
Fufuleatza 1 year ago
Danish gambit, good early attack
xChrisBui 1 year ago
nice !
BenBlunt1 1 year ago
BRILLIANT!!!
zach100590 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They Sold Their Souls For Rock And Roll
/watch?v=2OyP4ETNygo
TheKINGFEDOR 1 year ago
I'm not a bad player, and must confess that I absolutely did not see this coming.
nezpercenathan 1 year ago
Definitely one of the sickest check mates i have ever seen!! By move 10 white is ahead in material, but after move 12 Na6 black should have just resign, the game was lost...
redhunt077 1 year ago
astig
hahaha
joroz221 1 year ago
let me guess you just learned you opponent to play chess ?
valentijnraw 1 year ago
Wow niceeeeee
1Shot1Hit 1 year ago
excellent commitment-- you need discipline and concentration to pull that off, not to mention creativity, well done! thumbs up!
batmandannyb 1 year ago
boom
SotNist 1 year ago
Brilliant!
groveavenue 1 year ago
im sorry but.... I dont think that its a brillant combination, black´s played just like a little boy ...
rubenchov86 1 year ago
What the fuck happened at 0:40 after Qa4? why the fuck black initiated Qc6? for what? how about Nxc4? this is a great game? you must be playing with a fiver year old kid you fucking jack ass. Go play your xbox
siiiixiiiin1 1 year ago
@siiiixiiiin1 then Nd6xQe4? it seems worse. can you explain it? what the continuation? why not Qg4? are you thinking for yourself or analyze it with computer? cos my computer (gnu chess), I set it to 0:40 position, he play as black, make the same move as the video, except after white Ng5, black Ng6 (didn't eat the queen). i think this combination is great and you're just a big mouth motherfucker!!!
potchonk 1 year ago
@siiiixiiiin1 lol big mouth that was the best move for black and there is no way around it. Black loses regardless...
redhunt077 1 year ago
@jack19790 What on earth?
wario356 1 year ago
danish gambit?
rhymmasta 1 year ago
@rhymmasta smith morra gambit, with danish style.
dmed312 1 year ago
that was beautiful, thanks for sharing.
blakerwalk 1 year ago
tbh i think Kasparov should be nr 1. Bobby fischer? Mostly americans would think he was best. And i guess its time to move Magnus Carlsen into the list ^^
oyvindmacody 1 year ago
That's a good game. You're good and your opponent wasnt so weak (other idiots try to explain your winning by this). Well done.
haine920 1 year ago
HEHEH!! awesome.. XD
someone2121996 1 year ago
Wow you had a fork on the queen and king with your knight but u didnt even need to capture the queen for an awesome mate :D
dennychen555 1 year ago
Now that's what I call a situation!
kingyaker2002 1 year ago
Yes Cobination is really pretty... But to say the truth your opponent was too weak, he defended very bad
Alexanderanchik 1 year ago
5....Nc6 is best for black.
aafrederic 1 year ago
excellent. love sacrificing big for impressive check mates that the opponent just gets draged into
partonfilaton 1 year ago
Nice game Danish opening sacrificing wow
quebectax 1 year ago
Damn good match, actually. I've seen some matches that people claim to be exceptional, but this is actually a very good match.
LeLimeLine 1 year ago
nice
dannyp136 1 year ago
Beautiful!
prodi66 1 year ago
wow. thats awesome!
leewhite82 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jack19790 you are my fucking idol mate
wuksanz 1 year ago
@jack19790 you are my fucking idol mate
wuksanz 1 year ago
wow nice move
saures1999 1 year ago
Hi ChessNerdFighter , your moves are excellent. Black makes many wrong moves. For example once white puts its queen from B3 to A4, why did'nt black move its horse from A5 to C6. Rather it movesE4 to C6. Its a wrong move..
yajusjv 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
really awesome game!!!
dreamtheater39 1 year ago
pretty good
UnwashedGoblin 1 year ago
wats ur rating it must be like 2k something right
knife071 1 year ago
Lol. Black totally took the danish gambit.
poweredbyvlad 1 year ago
@poweredbyvlad smith morra gambit you scrub
l3oneeeeeeeee 1 year ago
can't the king just move left?
NealenB510 1 year ago
@NealenB510 Bishop at 4c
XxKingJoJoxX 1 year ago
@NealenB510 whenever he moves he'll be beaten so he just cant move
UnwashedGoblin 1 year ago
was that an evans gambit?
adamthecg 1 year ago
very nice
mohapele 1 year ago
how many moves before did you see it??
ducksaj 1 year ago
Wow. neat!
bionicpotato 1 year ago
@jack19790 lo,say what?
bionicpotato 1 year ago
Can this be called "Knights Endgame" ? Wikipedia on Two_knights_endgame describes this but I was curious if this could be called so ?
zetajag 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can this be called "Knights Endgame" ? Wikipedia on Two_knights_endgame describes this but I was curious if this could be called so ?
zetajag 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Can this be called "Knights Endgame" ? Wikipedia on Two knights endgame describes this but I was curious if this could be called so.
zetajag 1 year ago
Comment removed
zetajag 1 year ago
Wow... nice sacrifice! And you say you did that in a 5 minute game? Did you calculate it out beforehand or just hope it would work because it looked like you had a decent attack going?
Matthew2400 1 year ago
why didnt black knight take e5 bishop? He would have lost a rook but would have had a chance of checking king and perhaps mating...? (omg mating sounds wrong)
xenekaro 1 year ago
Fuck me swift, that was brilliant!
0lilKayde0 1 year ago
pfft nice man
tomandband 1 year ago
@jack19790 Dude hysterical I love you
BrianJonesification 1 year ago
wow man, nice combination, i love it, but i think we should play i also have some
bleach93able 1 year ago
This is a great match. I have tried the Smith Morra gambit in tourneys, but I usually play the wrong moves and get crushed. This video should be a great resource to look at. Thanks a lot :)
PurplelinkPL 1 year ago
@PurplelinkPL
Actualy that was the Danish opening
StubHorn 1 year ago