I am extremely happy that you called your Astronomical Instrument Telescope a "Schmidt-Cassegrain because 1 Professional Astronomer on Youtube.com called it a "Reflector" which We all know is incorrect and that a "Schmidt-Cassegrain is the Correct answer"!!!!
@Jules7892 Schmidt-Cassegrain at the same time reflector too. =) It mostly reflector, it is just have Schmidt lens to correct aberrations better than only Cassegrain.
When viewing close objects through low end telescopes and binoculars, you have to turn the focus wheel to focus in on objects, but once you range out to past 300 feet, the focus is fixed no matter what distance. That is the same focal position works for all objects. Anyone know why? Thanks.
Да Meade интересные телескопы, но в России их стоимость на 50% выше чем в США, очень жаль, есть отечественный производитель с высоким качеством оптики, но не столь технологически насыщенный! Интересно бы было визуапльно понаблюдать в большой Meade.
LX90's and LX200's FTW great telescopes. UHTC coatings FTW Meade got it right IMHO with those coatings. Does the LX90 serries have carbon fiber Tubes too or no? I am guessing no as thats one of the differences in cost from the LX200 line up. Very nice little setup she has there. Cheers, IC.
@IcechickenSr i thought the lx400 were the ones with carbon fiber. The lx200 are more expensive because they have a larger mount, MUCh larger tripod, and a diferent autostar controller with 147,000 objects instead of 30,000!!!
This was very interesting. I used to observe the night sky with my Celestron 5 some 20 years ago. I take it out once in awhile to see Mars or comets. I didn't know you could attach CCD cameras like that and put the image on a big tv. That is way cool!
though i have never used meade myself I have heard from people and read reviews on the internet regarding meade. thier products seem great however i have noticed a few comments that mirrors need recoating far too quickly and thier customer service is terrible. i have used celestron SC's for over 10 years (C5 and C8) and NEVER had a problem with them. i did once break the finderscope lense and i was sent a replacment the next day free of charge. I have just ordered a 11" CGEM. cant wait!!
The telescope itself does not magnify objects. The purpose of the telescope is to collect light. The magnification comes from the eyepiece that you are using. However, when viewing from Earth, the magnification is not really important because once you get up to over 200x magnification, the atmospheric blurring makes it harder to see objects.
It's an Astovid StellaCam3.
GreaTVidsMedia 4 weeks ago
I am extremely happy that you called your Astronomical Instrument Telescope a "Schmidt-Cassegrain because 1 Professional Astronomer on Youtube.com called it a "Reflector" which We all know is incorrect and that a "Schmidt-Cassegrain is the Correct answer"!!!!
Jules7892 2 months ago
@Jules7892 Schmidt-Cassegrain at the same time reflector too. =) It mostly reflector, it is just have Schmidt lens to correct aberrations better than only Cassegrain.
GeorgefromPiter 1 month ago
very informative indeed. like the setup!
greedypigg62 2 months ago
When viewing close objects through low end telescopes and binoculars, you have to turn the focus wheel to focus in on objects, but once you range out to past 300 feet, the focus is fixed no matter what distance. That is the same focal position works for all objects. Anyone know why? Thanks.
gr8vibes2 3 months ago
@gr8vibes2
Is it because the light from the oserved object hits the telescope in an angle and not aligned? I'm not sure.
Raksonevs 3 months ago
you are pice of shit show me the sky no fuckin telescope!!!!
jbaczynski1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is the real deal
magma84 6 months ago
What kind of CCD camera is that ?
TheBjornfred 6 months ago
Nice scope sold my lx50 10" while ago may get an lx90 one day preferably the 12". Thanks for the video happy stargazing !! ;-)
clumpofgrass 8 months ago
Да Meade интересные телескопы, но в России их стоимость на 50% выше чем в США, очень жаль, есть отечественный производитель с высоким качеством оптики, но не столь технологически насыщенный! Интересно бы было визуапльно понаблюдать в большой Meade.
inferno1708 9 months ago
some the stars are starships there telepathic if u ask them are they galactics they move
danceabout1 1 year ago
telaskoüüüüyüüp
zihbant 1 year ago
Me want
matforsbon 1 year ago
huh?
SIZZLESLACKS 1 year ago
ok :)
JALLU75 1 year ago
i think i know you did you use to go to college in cambridgeshire?
clovelywindheaven 1 year ago
8 or 10"
JALLU75 1 year ago
@JALLU75 looks like 8, and she states 8, my guess 8 :D
lynus111 1 year ago
@JALLU75 on the corrector plate is says the diameter is 203 mm so 8"
marlinen 11 months ago
what kind of CCD camera do you have
imanoob4 1 year ago
ive got the Celestial 50AZ telescope dunno if its any good but ive seen the Red Spot on Jupiter :O :D
kirza94 1 year ago
Woaw Great for a blinde date !
not the dejavu feeling and boring lets go drinking but instead go watch the stars
together with a glass of champagne and let her look and dream about the far far galaxy's and stars ...
She is all yours tonight !
Megasromanos 1 year ago
LX90's and LX200's FTW great telescopes. UHTC coatings FTW Meade got it right IMHO with those coatings. Does the LX90 serries have carbon fiber Tubes too or no? I am guessing no as thats one of the differences in cost from the LX200 line up. Very nice little setup she has there. Cheers, IC.
IcechickenSr 1 year ago
@IcechickenSr i thought the lx400 were the ones with carbon fiber. The lx200 are more expensive because they have a larger mount, MUCh larger tripod, and a diferent autostar controller with 147,000 objects instead of 30,000!!!
hiian123 1 year ago
what an annoying accent...
PorsukToros 1 year ago
@PorsukToros yeah right... it's a damn fine accent.... i bet you don't even have an accent...
Basard100 1 year ago
@Basard100 believe me i have a strong accent.
PorsukToros 1 year ago
This was very interesting. I used to observe the night sky with my Celestron 5 some 20 years ago. I take it out once in awhile to see Mars or comets. I didn't know you could attach CCD cameras like that and put the image on a big tv. That is way cool!
johnnny49 2 years ago
Meade is okay. Their customer supports was very bad. I was thinking about buying a Meade telescope, but may buy Celestron CPC 11 instead.
dmana3172 2 years ago
though i have never used meade myself I have heard from people and read reviews on the internet regarding meade. thier products seem great however i have noticed a few comments that mirrors need recoating far too quickly and thier customer service is terrible. i have used celestron SC's for over 10 years (C5 and C8) and NEVER had a problem with them. i did once break the finderscope lense and i was sent a replacment the next day free of charge. I have just ordered a 11" CGEM. cant wait!!
MikeDay82 2 years ago
excuse me I didn't understand how much is the magnification
Angm0r 2 years ago
The telescope itself does not magnify objects. The purpose of the telescope is to collect light. The magnification comes from the eyepiece that you are using. However, when viewing from Earth, the magnification is not really important because once you get up to over 200x magnification, the atmospheric blurring makes it harder to see objects.
jzone2006 2 years ago