Added: 2 years ago
From: DraganHKSEvo
Views: 17,292
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (125)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • hey how u planted that palm tree in sandbox cryengine 3? i idnt fund it );

  • Cryengine 3 is pure crap. Because of the required console-compatibility, they had to get around with the ultra-low VRAM of both Consoles. (256 mb) This results in poor draw-distance, low-res textures etc. etc.. Sure, they did a good job on faking everything, so it "looks awesome" with all the fancy Motion blur, bloom, lensflares and so on, but in the end, Cryengine 2 is simply far better

  • I would love to see a GTA made with this engine :D

  • why make a new engine if its not better than the older engine. thats stupid.!! all the trailers of cryengine 3 just shows us what this engine can do!

  • @nordimafia they made a new engine worse so the consoles could run it on hardware that is 6-7 years old.

  • have you watch the cryengine 3 sdk demo map? /watch?v=UyeA8C-v-uU cryengine 3 is better than cryengine 2! they made the graphics lower for crysis 2, because they want more people 2 play the game. 

  • @fragman08 i dnt play crysis coz it blows. so no i havent noticed lol

  • Cryengine 3 is good but we need next-gen video cards to run this stuff at full speed and full max settings

  • large open environment?lame.cryengine 3 has small draw distance,cryengine 2 is very very large draw distance(up to 1-2 km i think)

  • cryengine 2 has better graphics

  • i wish the hell is like this, then if i go there i still see the beauty of nature lol

  • Does anyone know where I can buy cryengine 3 cuz, I cant find it anywhere.. Pls help, thanks

  • Are you kidding me? Just stick with CryEngine 2. It comes free with the purchase or obtaining of Crysis.

  • This engine is for consoles (ps3 and xbox 360) =) cryEngine 2 is for PC

  • its not free

  • охуеть крайтэк когда создадут движок 4-7 это уже будет пиздец графика

  • This just looks like Crysis on low with shaders on Medium.

  • @evillllll1 ummm it is crysis...well sort of

  • @TheSeventiethSeven

    Well, unless you're have facts to be based upon this is an opinative question; with that in mind i must say that i respectfully disagree, i played Crysis, Warhead and im still playing Crysis 2 and my opinion is that Crysis 2 looks way better than Crysis (All of these are PC comparisons of course)

  • Some PC fanboys said: CONSOLES WILL NEVER ABLE TO RUN CRYSIS! ........

    Here. Xbox and PS3 can easily run crysis with this engine =P. HA-HA

  • @Icarax105 Not true at all. But maybe you never played Crysis 2 on a console.

  • That's because the fat bitch we used to cheer and pay until she sang had her guts ripped out so that she could enter that small, dwarf door and land in a bloody mess of her own entrails.

    Crysis 2 is terrible on the PC and even worse on the console for which it was specifically designed for. With a lack of sufficient patching, less processing power, overpriced DLC, and fewer weapons, Crysis 2 faceplants into the ground that we call FAIL, hard.

  • @HaloModder555 Actually Crysis 2 was amazing to me. I really dont care much about graphics i just dont want it to look like an arcade game from like 1987. It almost eliminates camping and your probably just saying its terrible because either your bad at it or just hate that there`s less guns. Killzone didnt have that many guns either and i also loved that. Crysis 2 doesnt have overpowered guns like Black Ops or even MW2. Cod is a fail to me

  • @xXBlaziinSiCKXx it's terrible because the engine was gimped so it can run on shitty consoles.

  • @fragman08 So there were a few bugs, and it was designed for "shitty consoles"

    Which console is the good kind to you?

    Wii??

    Gamecube?

    The game itself was good, excluding bugs like unable to hear squad members which is easy to solve while playing the game

    I dont understand why people keep hating on it.

  • @xXBlaziinSiCKXx No gaming console is adequate for my gaming purposes. I have a custom built crossfire rig and an i7 processor, and yet nothing fully utilizes it. Cryengine 2 is far superior to cryengine 3 because it is capable of much better draw distances and environmental interaction (if you fire a rocket at the most distant palm tree in crysis, it will be cut down. If you can see it, you can interact with it) In crysis 2 there almost no environmental interaction.

  • @fragman08 Yes i understand that cryengine 2 is better

    Im talking about the game itself and the gameplay of it

  • @fragman08 I honestly dont care if you can destroy Trees and have enviormental interactions

    What is so great about interacting with a palm tree and being able to blow it up in a 1st person shooter

    Leave that stuff to games like Just cause 2

  • @xXBlaziinSiCKXx the water looks shit in cryengine 3 compared to 2. my point was they had to tone down a lot of effects to get it to run stable on consoles.

  • @fragman08 Halomodder is basically saying that the game was terrible because of the overpriced dlc, which costed the same as mw2, few guns, and less sufficient patches

    The DLC is 4 maps for about 15$, Same with MW2

    Most of the bugs can be easily solved or ignored because of being unable to hear squad members, go into a private match and you can

    no background music in-game, who cares?

    I dont think many people play a game to blow up trees or look at apparently "shit" water

  • @xXBlaziinSiCKXx you're still missing the point- Whether or not you do those things, the engine is less capable of graphical fidelity. I don't give a flying fuck how you play your game- you're free to do so however you like. Just don't pretend consoles can run crysis, when they're really running crysis lite edition. (2)

  • @Icarax105 They had to cut down on draw distance, enviromental interaction and effects to get crysis 2 to run on consoles. Furthermore I don't think consoles are able to render crysis at anything above 720p without using upscaling, which is not true HD.

  • bite me Frostbite 2

    On the other hand, thanks to our *OLD* "friends", Xbox 360 and the PS3, Crysis 2 isnt getting half of this.

  • @Fut4venger Crysis 1 DX9 looks better than Crysis 2 DX9, weird, isn't it.

  • I love the character animation, it's just epic :X

  • THIS is how crysis 2 is going to look like in a month when they finish it up! :D its just a pitty that they couldnt have canceled release date to add all the features!

  • The game Crysis 2 doesn't look like this. I think they've just made it look nicer than it really is in the games....

  • how much of this was in Crysis 2?

    Not even half of it...

  • If anyone can take us to the next gen its these guysmat crytek, they are like gaming gods

  • Pity! All this work just to satisfy some people's need to destroy nature...

  • I wish they'd fix the particle effects. It gets on my nerves. >_>

  • Doesnt look any special to me

  • Germany ftw.

  • better then realtime

  • i would want cry engine 3 porn

  • It makes me laugh to see the amassed comments of console owners about the incredible graphics and realism. Whereas that was what we had back in 2007 when Crysis 1 came out... and consoles would never listen and just blindly stick to halo or COD4.

    I know the red ring issue with the xbox is due to their terrible internal cooling and airflow, I reckon this game will rape the xbox resulting in more red rings in the future... So in a good way they can see first hand what we loved 3 years ago.

  • @ivangutowski fuck i just notice i wasted a coment on this crappy copy pasta on some other video. get a life dude.

  • @GraveUypo I like copy pasta. Tastes good.

  • @ivangutowski yeah too bad the xbox cant run this engine at its fullest shaders and textures will be low quality

  • i would like to play devil may cry, ninja gaiden and metal gear solid with this engine

  • @youssef0eddoumali

    I would like to play the Sims with this engine!

  • @tomimn2233 or pacman and super mario ('.')

  • @tomimn2233 Its a Dream :(

  • The engine is amazing, the games for it however just aren't.... just give me a straight foreward shooter, and i will love you for it.

  • It's not next gen, it's current gen if you have a gaming pc.

  • @fragman08 cryengine better than bf3

  • @fragman08 Yes your right, it is not next gen if it is not next gen.

  • @fragman08 yeah u gotta remember that this was posted oct 2009 its 2011 now if you hadnt already noticed

  • @SuperReptus if you hadn't noticed, crysis 1 using cryengine 2 was released in 2007 and was better than this. If you hadn't already noticed.

  • @fragman08 way far behind ged if you have console

  • good now games look like real like O.O i new it would happen some day

    XD

  • 1:16 It's like... Real! O_o

  • ich will zocken....

  • I cannot wait to use this engine with direct x 11 tessalation eh um may i just be a dick and point out consoles can never be updated past direct x9.0c. Meaning untill the next gen consoles come out pcs will always be ahead ;). But at the same time i think its incredible how they have built an engine that looks awesome for once on consoles iswell. I would say its one massive leap forward for consoles and only a small step for pc's....Or will the pc verrsion blow my mind iswell :O

  • @zouga it probably will blow everyone's minds. I look forward to see top-notch DX11 hardware fail to display it to it's full potential again like it was the case with Crysis.

  • @xamanto probably won't happen again. it was a mistake on their part to launch such a hardware demanding game. cripped the sales for both the game and the engine (can you name one game besides crytek's own using cryengine2 off the top of your head?)

    its kinda sad, but money do all the talking. i kinda miss that sensation new ground-breaking graphics every 2 years we used to have up until 2006. we've been kinda stuck on more or less the same level of graphics since then.

  • GOOOOD DAMIT I CANT WAIT FOR CRYSIS 2 (wonder if u gte pc version if u can import crysis 2 levels LOL)

  • @rexhunter1 Was that sarcasm? Because Aion uses it, like the best MMO ever

  • Why dont all games use cryengine? :D

  • All this, and the LAST engine still looks better than this on the PC.

  • i almost cried. No kidding.

  • i would love to see call of duty made with this engine :D

  • @lostmindkid101 Then it would be the same old shit, same shitty gameplay, same bullshit kills constantly, just in better graphics

    its like wrapping ship up in a shiny red present box

  • @lostmindkid101 you mean i would love to see call of duty wiped off the face of the earth it doesnt deserve this engine and neither does console

  • @lostmindkid101 why is everyone so hooked on such a bad game

  • @lostmindkid101 yeah since all call of duty games looks kind of outdated... oh wait, this does too

  • @lostmindkid101 id love to see the more superior battlefield with this engine

  • @lostmindkid101 I would love to see oblivion on this engine :D

  • @lostmindkid101 try Crysis 2 thats pretty much CoD on CE.

  • @lostmindkid101 Good thing Battlefield 3 is coming out in around 7 months then! ;)

  • @lostmindkid101 cod doesn't even deserve such an engine

  • I heard that the engine is available for the public is this true if yes please give me the link for the download please.

  • True Next-gen gaming huh?? MY ASS!! I wont buy a new pc to handle those games...

  • @UrbanskaterzTeam Lol I found a good deal at Best buy... Now all I need is a $200 dollar graphics card... Perferably ATI Radeon 5770

  • actually the Crytech 3 for the consoles is worse than Crytech 2, this is probably Crytech 3 for PC.

  • graphics always look worse on ps3 than xbox 360. i dont know why considering technically the ps3 is more powerful. but ovbiously the 360 utilizes its hardware. and ps3 doesnt. shadows are terrible on ps3 compared to 360 and colour lacks aswell ? confusinng... hmm

  • @doylieboy1 Actually I just bought an Xbox 360 today and the graphics are utter shit compared to PS3, even with an HDMI Cable and not just standard plugs!!! Wtf

  • @ENDORPHINSAM utter shit? lmao omgod fanboys again. open your eyes they are EXACTLY THE SAME XD if not more hi res than the ps3 versions as they are mostly ports from the 360 haha jesus PUHLEEESE

  • @doylieboy1 D:>

  • @ENDORPHINSAM You bought the same game for 2 consoles?

  • @TheKonohaWhiteFang7 Yes, because when I Googled, that Xbox 360 could only play on High, then Googled that PS3 could play on the option higher, I bought it for PS3 and sold the one on Xbox 360

  • uoh mahy gard

  • Amazing what technology has lead to huh?

  • graphics dont mean anything lol as long is the game is fun

  • @JacobBoddington

    I agree, but it's needed in shooter game, to be able to see your enemies. But in other game, it doesn't matter thats much... like gta games... =P

  • agreed, in fps, realistic-ness is the fun for most people

  • @xXZarlachXx more first person games in general i rekon. but yeah its all bout gameplay really

  • @JacobBoddington but graphics make the game more fun

  • This is the engine that Halo Reach is going to use. Halo Reach is going to be one incredible looking game for sure.

  • hahaha your completely wrong friend. Bungie created it's own engine for Halo Reach.

  • God my fucking bro thinks that those graphics suk what a fucking MORON

  • just think , how good machinimas will be done in this engine! :D KEEP IT UP CRYTEK

  • HOLY !!!! my heart beat faster now o_0

  • .........pure nazi engineering

  • 360 and PS3 fanboys can finally agree on something! This Game engine will be EPIC!!!!!

  • too bad its downgraded for consoles...

  • And? Its still going to look fantastic...I'm not inclined to pay over a thousand euros to play videogames..maybe you are.

  • ahahah , you dont have too pay thousands for it, I made my gaming PC, that runs Crysis 1 full quality, no lag, for 50 euro's!!! it shows, that people who DO pay thousands for a machine, just do it so they look good, not for the actual games, mine playes every game you can think of.

  • 50 euro's i doubt it mate. i paid about 400 euro's and that was just about enough to play all games maxed out. only just. and crysis 1 isnt that demanding now anyway compared to newer games

  • @doylieboy1 trust me, it was £40, 50 ish euro, i know, ive got it.

  • lol ok its probably a fuckin clockwork computer then from the 1800's lmao. i build computers quite regularly, cheapest you can get a desktop built from scratch is about 400. whats your spec then on this bargain of the year lol ?

  • @doylieboy1 yeaha clockwork computer from the 1800's, that can run crysis...wow thats some fucking technology there mate.I got it from work, everything is stock exept RAM, graphics card and bits n bobs, i am at work right now, i will tell you the specs when i get back.

  • OMG

  • Absolutely stunning. I saw this video when Gamersyde posted it and I was blown away. I can't wait and see what game will be produced with this.

  • Why can't there be MMORPGs that look like that...?

  • LOL i ask the same question thing...is mmos have to cater to all markets...and users...if they had a spec game like this...only 25% would able to play rhe rest would be left in the dust

  • most MMOers who pay their $15 monthly fees for high end games that will support this engine, i'd imagine will have a system that can run handle this engine, at least, at medium quality.

  • Aion (the Asian grind feast uses the 1st cryengine) It looks pretty good but nothing like this

  • OMFG!

  • LOL!! indeed!! :)

  • looks like cryengine 2 just toned down alot and made more effitiant for the consoles. Still looks great! (for Consoles)

  • imagine storming the beaches of normandy!!!

  • i want one , that looks so F-ing real

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more