Quite an annoying commercial. No wonder Microsoft keeps making products worse with upgrades while improcing a couple of things and of course making it so upgrading is mandatory. Word 2007 sucks compared to 08, Windows 7 stripped away the Delete button from folder view, the network activity icon and more stuff. Hotmail icons are all black now, so it feels like looking at a screen from 1950.
do you now that you can download a free image of Windows? 99$ is the price of licence.
on a mac, the licence price is included in the price of your mac and it is the thing wich make mac's price 2 or 3 times more than a PC wth same configuration.
A) Macs aren't '2 or 3 times' the price. Find me a PC that will last 10 years, with an equal quality display build quality, trackpad.speaker and keyboard for under the price of a mac.
B) You are aware you can pirate OSX as well? But when you're over 14 and you have to pay for things to do real work there's a massive difference between paying $29 and $399.
@andyhmltn A) Are you saying that you still use a computer from 10 years ago? whether it be Apple or Windows, if you are still using a computer that was built in '01, then you're probably just using it for minor tasks (ie solitaire).
B)1. Windows isn't $399, ultimate is $319, and if you get it, then you probably need it for something, other wise the home version is $119
@wilhamlin A) Which would you rather have: A pc that lasts 2 years or a pc that lasts 10?
B) We're talking about the full featured OS. Not a stripped down one. Full featured OSX = $29. Full featured windows = $319. You are aware you don't pay $29 per update? Just when they release a new OS. You don't pay for patches. They probably come out about every year and a half.
@andyhmltn Well if you're running a PC that's 10YO without upgrading it, you can just straight up do very little. and Apple hasn't released a new OS since 1999 when OSX first came out. Lion and Snow Leopard and every other one they have are all equivalent to service packs in Windows, the difference being that you dont have to pay for Windows SP's
@wilhamlin Sigh. You clearly don't understand how OSX works. You think that to qualify as a new OS they have to be OSX OSXI OSXII? Lol. Snow Leopard > Lion is the equivalent of Vista > Windows 7. A windows server patch is to fix the numerous bugs windows has. OSX has something like that. You get them for free every few months. EG: OSX 7.1 and OSX 7.2
@andyhmltn no, hell even apple doens't call them different OS's, they call them different versions of OSX. Snow Leopard- Lion = Vista - Vista w/ SP1. And a service patch fixes bugs, as well as allows for technologies that older versions weren't up for among other things.
@wilhamlin No it's not. You are thinking of 10.6 > 10.6.1. Did sp1 bring thousands of new features and a redesigned UI? Hmmm something tells me you've never used a mac.
@ahmednematallah Well then your aunt should stick to XP. I want to run my OS in 64 bit on intel to its full ability. I don't want to hold back on my system so I can support so old software.
@ahmednematallah I use macs because they run OSX (the best OS available) and have superior peripherals (screen, trackpad, keyboard, case.) Please explain how windows is better? You can't just say 'linux is better.' Are you aware of the multiple distros linux has or did you just install ubuntu? Linux isn't an option because it doesn't run 99% of the programs I need.
Excuse me for intruding your fierce battle, but what exactly does linux not support or which programs do not have their corresponding analogues on it?
@olegv11 CS5, Final cut pro, Sequal pro, xCode, Titanium, Steam (I believe.) I use linux a tonne. Just on my dedicated server and not as a personal computer.
@andyhmltn I use ubuntu, kubuntu, used slackware and debian...
what is so superior about macs screen, trackpad, keyboard, case are available at better quality elsewhere and are manufactured by logitech, motherboards made by ASUS
are you a video editor, programmer, CS5 super user, etc.... or don't you need those programs
i said i dual boot linux and windows, you can't just use one OS
what is mac good for (linux->programming, windows->gaming) maybe mac is for video guys
@ahmednematallah Yes I am. I find mac superior to linux for development. The only thing linux is good for in my books is hosting the server. There's really no decent IDE's for linux and it can't run xcode (a vital part in my job) so it's worthless.
@ahmednematallah Visual studio? lol. And you're forgetting iOS devices as well. You can't have the iOS compiler and SDK on a linux machine. I can then use titanium to develop cross platform mobile apps (what I'm paid £40k a year for.)
@andyhmltn 2. the marketing is brilliant for Mac, they make you think the OS is really cheap, but you're really just paying $30 for a patch. If you build your own PC and put OSX on it, it is cheaper for the first couple years, but then you have to pay for each "OS" and before you know it, you've spent more on patches than it would've cost you to run Windows
@andyhmltn Apple hasn't com out with a new OS since 1999. Lion, Tiger, Snow Leopard are all just patches, with about the same amount of content as a SP for windows
@wilhamlin that shows how little you know. Did SP1 for vista contain thousands of new features and a redesigned UI? What about the patches like 10.7.1 and 10.7.2? Silly windows fan boys.
I'll bet Windows 1.0 was more stable and robust than VISTA !!!!
Plus, back then you got to chose the OS you wanted on your machine. Microsoft was in no position to force windows down your throats, it was not pre-installed on your machine and you could easily reformat, reinstall, install something else. Plug your own peripherals which were supplied with their own independent drivers. No activation, no bullshit.
The good old days when computers were simple and WORKED !!!!
@Ihateflagging123 Microsoft is still in no position to force Windows on anybody. Just most people want it. Other companies like DELL tried linux and they didn't sell. people want what they are familiar with. if they want an alternative OS they buy Apple.
@ZoonVanPoseidon Back then, $99 for this would be okay because it was a big improvement over MS-DOS. Nowadays, pricing something such as this for $99 would be atrocious.
According to the "Triumph of the Nerds" documentary, this was actually an advertisement for Windows 2.0, not 1.01. They were very similar, but obviously 2.x was a bit better.
@redtec989 I think he was even more of a nutcase in 1986. Must have got on some prescription drugs cause ol Billy G. couldn't take his complete and utter insanity anymore.
Nowadays if my computer doesn't come with windows paint its broken already
DukeNukemFl 1 week ago
Did Steve Balmer ever have a full head of hair????
jacksiin1000 2 weeks ago 5
Why couldn't they sell it in Nebraska???
RocketeerRaccoon 2 weeks ago
No wonder MS windows was shit until Windows 3.0 with adverts like this lol
Johfunu 4 weeks ago
Keep pressing 3 for him saying doh,doh,doh,doh,doh
MrTheduderocks 1 month ago
Quite an annoying commercial. No wonder Microsoft keeps making products worse with upgrades while improcing a couple of things and of course making it so upgrading is mandatory. Word 2007 sucks compared to 08, Windows 7 stripped away the Delete button from folder view, the network activity icon and more stuff. Hotmail icons are all black now, so it feels like looking at a screen from 1950.
randalusa 1 month ago
@randalusa
Oops, I meant Word 2007 sucks compared to 03.
randalusa 1 month ago
This POS is forward compatible and runs fast as fuck on my i5
heymisterderp 1 month ago
press 5 for 4
TheJason10700 1 month ago
I see he hasn't changed much.
piratesmvp 1 month ago
"EXCEPT IN NEBRASKA!"
YEA! Fuck Nebraska!
bud389 1 month ago 12
@bud389
Fuck off..
brettmiddle 3 weeks ago
I wanna see someone tell steve Ballimar about how good windows 3.1 is.
Because all he says is Windows 1.0 is horrible you should get windows 7 bla bla bla.
Weegeeisgoingtokillm 1 month ago
Now I know the 'Clock' application is included, I've decided to make the purchase
miniroll32 1 month ago
@miniroll32 Or the calender...damn...for only 99$.
AtrociousToast 1 month ago
reversi!? i'm sold
urgonnadie25 1 month ago
Really...... It has a 1 mega bite hard drive !!!! THATS HUGE HERE TAKE MY MONEY !!!!
64Blounts 1 month ago
I keep throwing money on the screen but nothing is happening.
bnzo00 1 month ago
And ... "a clock"
$99 for an operating system then relates to around $300 today. I'd want more than a clock and a few empty boxes!
JackRance1910 1 month ago
press 7 and get fun!
533041 1 month ago
mess with miamivice...
kinmanyuen 1 month ago
my advice: miami vice
don't answer: don awsur
refeeance 1 month ago
Sometimes I just wanna give Steve Ballmer a nice slap in the face
MegaSam179 1 month ago
6p it's been a while
TNH1n1 2 months ago
10p we meet again...
PopcornCutie3 2 months ago
CREEPY!
ffuentese 2 months ago
W T F
foreverMidi 2 months ago
Damn!
den2003 2 months ago 3
My theory is they shaved a money, force fed him massive quantities of cocaine, then made him CEO
deadballo 2 months ago
Can i have one, i sent letter already, 99 dollars is very cheap :)
gamervalter 2 months ago
Mines on order....
DJTwenty2020 2 months ago
Atrocious
MacAdvisorUK 2 months ago
Disgusting.......
mrodalc 2 months ago
Ballmer never had hairs in his life
TheLampCoder 2 months ago
REVERSI
dmurph0 2 months ago 2
1. Is this real? 2. WTF "except in Nebraska".
pokelegos 2 months ago
@pokelegos they use B.O. boxes in nebraska.. havent you ever smelled em?
alexriesenbeck 2 months ago
He looks as stupid on this tape as he looks today!
fpeloquin9 2 months ago 2
And sadly Windows 1.0 is probably more error free then Windows 7.
salozmen29 2 months ago
I think he is possesed,for and from the sales
vaghoust 2 months ago
dude chill
edrickkills97 2 months ago
Jeez didn't this guy ever have hair? lol :)
hoppimike 2 months ago
but it is cheaper than the new PCs
oskarchust1 2 months ago
@oskarchust1 $99 for Windows, not the PC.
k0rva1 2 months ago
@k0rva1 lol
oskarchust1 2 months ago
i remember this
oskarchust1 2 months ago
did anyone call mind calling the number
jman6866 2 months ago
I guessed $1 :)
Cod4Master9243 3 months ago
he's moved up i suppose
SuzukiRider93 3 months ago
240p, we eat again...
WarcraftMelodies 3 months ago
Thus guy is nuts i swear XD
flyboy2000008 3 months ago
@flyboy2000008 Need crazies to run a company..
raptors222222 2 months ago
Is it too late to order?
Callum2356 3 months ago 61
que verguenza lo ke eran los 80s jaajajajajaja
MsShady1993 3 months ago
i don't think so
see win developer preview to belive me
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
Notice how Steve Ballmer's face changes colour from second-to-second. He was a Microsoft computer virtualoid.
clemstevenson 3 months ago
What in the Christ?!
TwoDrinksIn 3 months ago
I wish that Windows 7 would cost only $99 :).
meskisz 3 months ago
@meskisz I wish it costed $29 like OSX :p
andyhmltn 3 months ago
Comment removed
moprama 3 months ago
Comment removed
moprama 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@andyhmltn 29$ is the price of the osx CD.
do you now that you can download a free image of Windows? 99$ is the price of licence.
on a mac, the licence price is included in the price of your mac and it is the thing wich make mac's price 2 or 3 times more than a PC wth same configuration.
moprama 3 months ago
@moprama You are aware that:
A) Macs aren't '2 or 3 times' the price. Find me a PC that will last 10 years, with an equal quality display build quality, trackpad.speaker and keyboard for under the price of a mac.
B) You are aware you can pirate OSX as well? But when you're over 14 and you have to pay for things to do real work there's a massive difference between paying $29 and $399.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn A) Are you saying that you still use a computer from 10 years ago? whether it be Apple or Windows, if you are still using a computer that was built in '01, then you're probably just using it for minor tasks (ie solitaire).
B)1. Windows isn't $399, ultimate is $319, and if you get it, then you probably need it for something, other wise the home version is $119
wilhamlin 3 months ago
@wilhamlin A) Which would you rather have: A pc that lasts 2 years or a pc that lasts 10?
B) We're talking about the full featured OS. Not a stripped down one. Full featured OSX = $29. Full featured windows = $319. You are aware you don't pay $29 per update? Just when they release a new OS. You don't pay for patches. They probably come out about every year and a half.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn Well if you're running a PC that's 10YO without upgrading it, you can just straight up do very little. and Apple hasn't released a new OS since 1999 when OSX first came out. Lion and Snow Leopard and every other one they have are all equivalent to service packs in Windows, the difference being that you dont have to pay for Windows SP's
wilhamlin 3 months ago
@wilhamlin Sigh. You clearly don't understand how OSX works. You think that to qualify as a new OS they have to be OSX OSXI OSXII? Lol. Snow Leopard > Lion is the equivalent of Vista > Windows 7. A windows server patch is to fix the numerous bugs windows has. OSX has something like that. You get them for free every few months. EG: OSX 7.1 and OSX 7.2
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn no, hell even apple doens't call them different OS's, they call them different versions of OSX. Snow Leopard- Lion = Vista - Vista w/ SP1. And a service patch fixes bugs, as well as allows for technologies that older versions weren't up for among other things.
wilhamlin 3 months ago
@wilhamlin No it's not. You are thinking of 10.6 > 10.6.1. Did sp1 bring thousands of new features and a redesigned UI? Hmmm something tells me you've never used a mac.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn 319$ version has XP mode more like PPC mode in mac OSX except it isn't there
and patches in windows are free
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah Wrong. The patches in OSX are free too.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn where is PPC mode then
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah Outdated and not needed. Why are you complaining that you can't run software from 10 years ago?
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn many software is no longer supported like specialized software
my aunt uses some architectural planning program in XP mode (something like auto something, yes autocad and it's an older version)
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah Well then your aunt should stick to XP. I want to run my OS in 64 bit on intel to its full ability. I don't want to hold back on my system so I can support so old software.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn
xp is no longer supported except for some security patches
so you want to say mac is better
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah Yep
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn Forgot to tell you that was to you
macs are macs you can install windows, linux, bsd, anything on them
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah Yes of course I'm aware of that. OSX is still better.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn sorry i went to sleep
so why do you use macs then
another thing, PCs are cheaper and easy to construct, they have windows or linux and both are better than OSX
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah I use macs because they run OSX (the best OS available) and have superior peripherals (screen, trackpad, keyboard, case.) Please explain how windows is better? You can't just say 'linux is better.' Are you aware of the multiple distros linux has or did you just install ubuntu? Linux isn't an option because it doesn't run 99% of the programs I need.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn
Excuse me for intruding your fierce battle, but what exactly does linux not support or which programs do not have their corresponding analogues on it?
olegv11 3 months ago
@olegv11 CS5, Final cut pro, Sequal pro, xCode, Titanium, Steam (I believe.) I use linux a tonne. Just on my dedicated server and not as a personal computer.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn I use ubuntu, kubuntu, used slackware and debian...
what is so superior about macs screen, trackpad, keyboard, case are available at better quality elsewhere and are manufactured by logitech, motherboards made by ASUS
are you a video editor, programmer, CS5 super user, etc.... or don't you need those programs
i said i dual boot linux and windows, you can't just use one OS
what is mac good for (linux->programming, windows->gaming) maybe mac is for video guys
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah Yes I am. I find mac superior to linux for development. The only thing linux is good for in my books is hosting the server. There's really no decent IDE's for linux and it can't run xcode (a vital part in my job) so it's worthless.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn no decent IDE have you seen netbeans, qtdeveloper, kdevelop... (i'm a C++ programmer)
and visual studio (we're talking about windows too)
and Xcode allows you to program mac-only programs not cross platform (You'll make less money)
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@ahmednematallah Visual studio? lol. And you're forgetting iOS devices as well. You can't have the iOS compiler and SDK on a linux machine. I can then use titanium to develop cross platform mobile apps (what I'm paid £40k a year for.)
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn 2. the marketing is brilliant for Mac, they make you think the OS is really cheap, but you're really just paying $30 for a patch. If you build your own PC and put OSX on it, it is cheaper for the first couple years, but then you have to pay for each "OS" and before you know it, you've spent more on patches than it would've cost you to run Windows
wilhamlin 3 months ago
@wilhamlin The $29 isn't for the patch -.- The $29 is for the new OS. You get the patches for free.
andyhmltn 3 months ago
@andyhmltn Apple hasn't com out with a new OS since 1999. Lion, Tiger, Snow Leopard are all just patches, with about the same amount of content as a SP for windows
wilhamlin 2 months ago
@wilhamlin that shows how little you know. Did SP1 for vista contain thousands of new features and a redesigned UI? What about the patches like 10.7.1 and 10.7.2? Silly windows fan boys.
andyhmltn 2 months ago
@andyhmltn no, but windows 7 did...
jjoeshaw 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jjoeshaw Exactly the point I'm trying to make.
andyhmltn 2 months ago
@andyhmltn sorry but macs don't last for 10 years, macs from that time aren't supported by anything over OSX 10.4
and I bet they don't work except in museums
ahmednematallah 3 months ago
@meskisz Yeah I had to pay either $130 or $140 for windows 7 alone. Not sure what $99 translates into in todays currency though.
Crashandburn999 3 months ago
Jesus, did he EVER have hair?
johnsomnia 3 months ago 20
If I only to invest 20 grand in Microsoft back then till 99.
tryithere 3 months ago
Ballmer is a monkey.
Krisztian5HUN 3 months ago
I bet Windows didnt cost as much as the crack Ballmer smoked before making this commercial.
LordSamuelJ 3 months ago in playlist Microsoft Sucks 2
What a horrible commercial
mohammeddavis 3 months ago
You get a clock? Shit, I may have to buy it.
MyBrainIsPrettier 3 months ago
Hilarious video! And I bet it worked faster than Vista too lol
stephthestar90 3 months ago
What a Tool
AFLVideos2011 3 months ago
Finally some enthusiasm, advertisements these days are too subtle.
Mosse190 3 months ago 2
fucking idiot.
stammerc4 3 months ago
@stammerc4 agree
jezus22 3 months ago
A CLOCK! Shut up and take my money!
OMN1DYN4M1X 3 months ago
I GUESSED NO WHERE NEAR $99 O.O
TheChubTrio 3 months ago
"EXCEPT IN NEBRASKA!" take that Nebraska >:D!
marshmellowpops 3 months ago 18
This man is actually running MS today..
JohnWhitesideParsons 3 months ago 19
Clock?
chiorigreene 3 months ago
he hasnt changed at all he is still retarted
piercejustin0 3 months ago
I'm sorry windows 7. I have found someone better >:D
SO MUCH WIIIIN
9mvp9 3 months ago
except in nerbaska! LOL
TheIcecreambangbang 3 months ago
It's twice as funny at 2x speed.
MithrandirAgain 3 months ago
64 peoples live in nebraska .. LOL
dnscpan 3 months ago 2
@dnscpan I live in Nebraska
MidnightAero 3 months ago
Fuck I live in Nebraska.
XxSsickxX 3 months ago
Damn fat clown....he didnt say "developers" once!
eggbertsmith 3 months ago
Holy shit, Reversi!
FuckinSeriousBusines 3 months ago
why don't they have commercials like this anymore
flyingpostaldude 4 months ago
and today all i gotta do is touch the screen of my phone to get stuff with 1000 times the technology of this
jonzo22 4 months ago
O.O um...what did i just watch?
irmesia 4 months ago
This a##hole runs Microsoft?
mjtrike97 4 months ago
And Ballmer was acting like The Embarrassing Creepy Uncle Who Has Had Too Much To Drink Again (tm) even back then....
evilwillhunting 4 months ago
lol turn on cc abd trancribe audio lol!
001blackhole 4 months ago
63 people live in Nebraska
GloriousOtaku 4 months ago
Please! Don't hurt me! Please... It's scary!
vitormfgoncalves 4 months ago
I was hoping for checkers D:
AllofVideos 4 months ago
REVERSI?! I'M SOLD!
ZeroResolution 5 months ago 24
Can't you believe it? REVERSI
dot202 5 months ago 2
@dot202 You spellt it wrong.
Zestypanda 5 months ago
ooo ..ok ..he was already crazy back then ...haha
freaker126 6 months ago
Wow that guy is so annoying.
dylanmcferrenreturn2 6 months ago
que salame!
ropucheta 6 months ago
Sucks for Nebraska.
thevictor145 6 months ago 2
He sounds like a used car salesman and dresses like one too lol.
IronBrig4 6 months ago 16
A clock? dang, I'm sold!
gbnnn 6 months ago 7
MS selling Windows on TV SHOP. Priceless.
(you never get what they promisse..lol)
segr3do 6 months ago 4
I wonder if I mailed my money to that adress, if I would still get one of those computers :D as they always say, thinks were better in the 80's!
FoxenBPerry 7 months ago
Ну и придурок этот Балмер))
konopkoman 7 months ago
fuck windows 7 i'm downgrading
tomiatt2112 7 months ago 7
A CLOCK!
MrF9F1 7 months ago
Ich schrott jetzt meinen 1.200$ PC mit Windows 7 und kauf dafür den Computer für nicht 500$, nicht 1000$ SONDER den für 99$ :)
DerStreber2000 7 months ago
Damn! Did he ever have hairs?
ChristianHandoyo 7 months ago
Comment removed
Revenantti 7 months ago
okaaaay, hes kindof put me off windows...
MyRetardsUnited 7 months ago
Wow this looks great! Whens it coming out?
blaster2012 7 months ago 3
Ironic that Windows was sold like it was a carnival game.
rickcain2320 7 months ago
@rickcain2320 It was a carnival game back a the time, and it hasn't improved much now, to be honest.
TiagoMorbusSa 7 months ago
for $99 this shit is more stable then windows vista!
theanthony345 7 months ago 5
I'll bet Windows 1.0 was more stable and robust than VISTA !!!!
Plus, back then you got to chose the OS you wanted on your machine. Microsoft was in no position to force windows down your throats, it was not pre-installed on your machine and you could easily reformat, reinstall, install something else. Plug your own peripherals which were supplied with their own independent drivers. No activation, no bullshit.
The good old days when computers were simple and WORKED !!!!
Ihateflagging123 7 months ago 4
@Ihateflagging123 Microsoft is still in no position to force Windows on anybody. Just most people want it. Other companies like DELL tried linux and they didn't sell. people want what they are familiar with. if they want an alternative OS they buy Apple.
chentiangemalc 7 months ago
damn, ballmer was a nerd
CheersProduction 8 months ago
@CheersProduction
WAS a nerd?!? i think he became "nerdier" with time...:D
cordonsport5m 7 months ago
@cordonsport5m His voice is just so different then I remember I thought it was more, different
CheersProduction 7 months ago
...but will it run crysis???
pedinhuh16 9 months ago 6
"And can you belive it?!
Reversi!!
Thats right, all these features and Reversi!" LOL! : D
avpn90 9 months ago
He looks just as old as he does now.
MBP6705 9 months ago
Except in Nebraska..... O_o
boogioogigoof 9 months ago 2
But....can it play Crysis?
konochi520 9 months ago
@konochi520 Yup. For some reason he forgot to mention the nVidia GTX 590 quad sli config.
MBP6705 9 months ago
240p FTW
pufixas 9 months ago
Tasteful clothing.
wesmatron 10 months ago
In 1986 it was $99
In 2011 it's 25 Cents.
xXxGl1TcHxXx 10 months ago
$99?????
F*ck windows 7,
i'm gonna buy windows 1.0!
ZoonVanPoseidon 10 months ago 123
@ZoonVanPoseidon lol, yeah, but $99 in 1986 is worth $200 in 2011. So, depending on the Win 7 version, it might be a steal instead of version 1.0 lol
VMTrooper 9 months ago
@ZoonVanPoseidon
remember that there is inflation, you could by an ice cream for like 5 cents but you also got paid like 15cents an hour
legendp2011 9 months ago
@ZoonVanPoseidon Back then, $99 for this would be okay because it was a big improvement over MS-DOS. Nowadays, pricing something such as this for $99 would be atrocious.
Servonix 3 months ago
@Servonix and dos were needed to ;)
peterweber79 1 month ago
REVERSIEh!
demonabis 10 months ago
LOL, I laughed so hard at this commercial. Baller can not act.
winter32842 10 months ago
According to the "Triumph of the Nerds" documentary, this was actually an advertisement for Windows 2.0, not 1.01. They were very similar, but obviously 2.x was a bit better.
drygnfyre 10 months ago
LOL!!!!! he acts like its sooo cool and popular but now windows can do MUCH MUCH MORE
kokteilikook 10 months ago
REVERSI
SinaniPoke 10 months ago
HOLY SHIT!!! ITS PHIL DAVISON!!
aarongregpon 11 months ago
@aarongregpon He'll be happy to know that I've already told Randy Gonzalez.
ijustwannawatchshite 11 months ago
he was still a nutcase in 1986
redtec989 11 months ago 68
@redtec989 I think he was even more of a nutcase in 1986. Must have got on some prescription drugs cause ol Billy G. couldn't take his complete and utter insanity anymore.
SimpleKindOfMan604 3 months ago
@SimpleKindOfMan604 yep then he just sent him off to do the commercial.
redtec989 3 months ago
co on gupi jakis?
MrKondzioj 11 months ago