Animal activist attacks on American retailers increased 377 % in 2008.
According to the Animal Agriculture Alliance 640 acts of sabotage, vandalism, and arson occurred in 2008 against businesses that use animals. Groups involved in the attacks included the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF).
Peta the pressure group has supplied funding to the ELF in the past.
The ELF was classified as America's top domestic terror threat by the FBI in 2001
@CDLver Strikes me that Dr. Martin Luther King fought for human rights, something everyone cares about in some regards. I guess you're comparing African Americans to live stock than? All the same thing to you right?
Nobody cares about your "rights" movement. I do think we should treat animals better so they make better quality meat before they're slaughtered in a way that is painless as possible.
Dr. King's dream was not just limited to his prayers for the healing of relationships between all human beings. He often spoke about his love for animals: "One day the absurdity of the almost universal human belief in the slavery of other animals will be palpable. We shall then have discovered our souls and become worthier of sharing this planet with them."
@waratahNSW Good point and who knows how many deaths of working people thanks to sabotage that nobody claimed credit for...
Oh you did leave out that peta which is tax exempted fills elf's war chest and helps keep it's members out of jail. You'd think funding domestic terrorism would be against the law or something. Members of elf have actually been allowed in schools to do terrorism workshops.
@NJburbsSeeker, Strikes me that if PETA were funding the ELF as you claim, then the American FBI would seek an indictment under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act for colluding with so-called "domestic terrorists."
The fact is that the FBI hasn't because PETA didn't. Period.
@CDLver Claims? Ah peta has admitted to giving money to individuals who are part of elf and they all but condone their actions. Just because they're hiding it well doesn't mean they aren't guilty, but hey you believe their actions are justified. I mean who get's hurt when you blow up a building right?
@CDLver Why if I annoy a fanatic I think I've made a valuable contribution to society, unlike someone like you. So you believe peta who in large part simply annoys people, and funds terrorism is being investigated by the CIA? Grant you I think the IRS and FBI should be looking into peta, but I doubt peta is a danger to national security. And despite what you peta people online want, I'm not going any where.
The IRS and FBI have been squandering taxpayer money "looking" into PETA for years on behalf of the animal abusing industries that want PETA silenced. PETA is squeaky clean. You lose.
PETA IS a danger to Big Agra and Dairy, who want to sell you the diseased meat and putrid milk from cows who were fed pus-oosing pig skins, chicken shit, and euthanised, ground up shelter dogs and cats.
@CDLver lol...now you're being funny. peta is a danger to nobody, well they are if you considered they give money to domestic terrorist, but that link is pretty clear even if you can't prove it in a court of law. Anyway you're favorite group doesn't effect anything. People still consume the foods they wish to eat, wear what they want to, and their celebrity supporters are often hypocrites. The only thing they are are annoying. Like you, but you won't be on youtube much longer.
@NJburbsSeeker, do not waste your time trying to fight me. You can never silence the animal rights movement, ever. We only get stronger, and that in part is because of video sharing websites such as YouTube, where we are able to expose the cruelty humans inflict upon innocent animals. I will always be here. Always.
@CDLver Yes I've heard Newkirk say that a few times, the movement is still here her sanity has left long ago. And you've succeeded in nothing and accomplished little. You'll always be around like a virus will be.
@NJburbsSeeker, on the contrary, PETA's successes are many. Very recently a PETA undercover investigation of PLRS, a North Carolina animal contract lab that tests anything and everything on animals, was forced to close down and all 200 of the dogs, cats, rabbits, and other animals were liberated from their isolation cages and placed with shelters for adoption.
PETA is superb at their undercover investigations of animal abusers.
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA's successes include more than 1,000 companies who have pledged to not test their products on animals, but only use readily available non-animal methods.
CaringConsumer. com, a PETA website, lists the names and products that as a result of PETA's pressure, no longer blind rabbits in cosmetic testing, no longer force household cleaners down beagle dogs' throats, no longer cage and confine animals in isolation to die miserable deaths for human vanity.
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA's successes include their SNIP campaign, Spay and Neuter Immediately, Please, which sterilised 7,300 animals in 2010 at no cost/low cost to their guardians; 64,721 sterilisations since 2001. No one is ever turned away for inability to pay.
While the taxpayers of North Carolina pay $40 million dollars every year to kill shelter animals, PETA is addressing the root of the problem for FREE at no cost to the taxpayers.
@CDLver Yes and it is a shame every state agency peta attacks usually does a better job. Plus I have a problem with a group who's leader can't understand why people have children when there are children to adopt telling me what to do with any other aspect of my life.
Thanks to PETA's undercover investigation of the North Utah Valley Animal Shelter exposing the shelter for selling healthy, adoptable dogs and cats to the University of Utah to be used in lethal experiments that serve human beings no good, the legal practice of "pound seisure" has ended in Utah.
PETA exposes animal shelters who are supposed to humanely house, care for, and re-home animals, not profit from their sale to research labs.
PETA is a fierce and ethical champion for the animals. If not for PETA, General Motors would still be using primates in their crash testing, cosmetic companies would still be blinding rabbits in their cosmetic testing, and animals who would otherwise die in North Carolina's hideous gas chambers are provided with a humane release from a society who has so little regard for them that they would suffocate defenseless animals to death in a metal box for 30 minutes.
Thanks to PETA, Bioculture lab, which planned to capture more than 4,000 monkeys from Mauritius and transport them to Guayama, Puerto Rico, to confine them to cages, force the animals to breed, and sell their offspring to U.S. and foreign laboratories for use in painful and deadly tests will never happen! Puerto Rican lawmakers just approved two landmark ordinances banning the import, export, breeding, and use of monkeys in experiments within its boundaries! PETA saves animals!
@CDLver So, rather than curing diseases by doing research on animals close to humans peta as you claim blocked this from happening. Well, mission accomplished. More humans and animals will suffer as scientists are slowed down in doing their research. I'm sure you think the lose of a human life is okay, but I am not like you, I'm rational. If it makes you feel any better though I'd gladly trade your life to have a few hours with my dog again.
That is exactly what pharmabusiness wants you, a useful idiot, to believe: saving a child means having to kill a non-human animal. Animal research does not save human life. Researchers lie, and PETA has exposed these cuckoo scientists and their animal testing charade.
After pressure from PETA, the American Association for Cancer Research retracted a study by animal experimenter Nagendra Ninagaraj, who deliberately falsified the results of brain tumour experiments on mice.
Billions of dollars and 85 failed AIDS vaccines later that were tested on 100s of chimps, who've endured 2 decades of immense suffering, and not a single vaccine proved successful in human clinical trials. These vaccines, however, protected chimps from HIV infection.
"Even if animal experiments did result in a cure for AIDS, OF WHICH THERE IS NO CHANCE, I'd be against it on moral grounds."
PETA HAS made significant strides for animals tortured in senseless experiments under the guise of medical research.
PETA catapulted the issue of animal suffering in experiments in '81 with the launch of the precedent-setting "Silver Spring monkeys" case, which resulted in the first arrest and criminal conviction of a U.S. animal experimenter on charges of cruelty to animals, the first confiscation of abused laboratory animals, and the first U.S. Supreme Court victory for animals in labs!
@CDLver So everyone who does medical research is really just there to abuse animals for the fun of it.
I've read your propaganda, so I know about the case you're referring too. The sad fact is though most of the time peta screws things up, and the authorities can't use the material they've brought them. Leave the investigating to the professionals.
@NJburbsSeeker, I did not say that medical research is just there to abuse animals for fun. You did.
I said that researchers are lining their pockets with federal taxpayer dollars conducting uselss experiments on animals that serve human beings no good purpose.
Who are the profesional investigators looking into abuse of research animals? The 70 APHIS inspectors of the USDA charged with inspecting 10,000 facilities per year. Those professionals? Hah!
@CDLver You mean the people have the nerve to feel that they should be rewarded for their years of hard work. I mean come on they're only coming up with treatments to help people. Also you're not the first to complain about the FDA, but instead of lobbying for change you wine and scream and dress up like animals. Tell me in what context it would be okay to experiment on an animal? You can't so I can't trust you to be subjective on this topic.
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA's undercover investigation of PLRS contract animal lab was no "screw up." As you can see on my channel, the lab closed its doors and 200 animals were saved directly because of PETA's investigation and their subsequent formal complaint to the USDA of animal cruelty.
PETA has brought cruel and greedy scientists tormenting innocent animals to their knees like only the world's most influential animal rights organisation can!
@CDLver Sure whatever, but I want to know are you against all animal testing? Reputable scientist say it is the only way to test life saving drugs and find cures. I'm not talking about cosmetics or proving things we already know. I'm talking about sacrificing animals to improve the lives of human beings and consequently animals as well. Are you like peta in that you'd rather see people suffer than hurt an animal? Can't do research with computers alone and experimenting only humans is unethical.
Which reputable scientists? The researchers paid to produce favorable "results" for the pharmaceutical industry so that drug companies can market a new cancer therapy every 2 years despite that drug's ineffectiveness and high toxicity to humans, as evidenced by Genentech's latest breast cancer therapy Avastin. Though the data proved that Avastin didn't improve the quality nor extend the life of cancer patients, the FDA approved the drug for use generating 2.3 billion dollars in sales in '07.
@CDLver I though the 9-11 truth crowd cornered the market on crazy conspiracies, but you impress me to no end. Is it possible in let's say the last 50 years or so some useful medications were developed that helped people and animal testing was part of the research or was all of it just to make money and torture animals for fun? You're probably right scientists are just a bunch of greedy sadists, they could be people trying to achieve anything meaningful. You're a joke.
@NJburbsSeeker, contrary to your inflammatory comment, PETA doesn't want to see any living being suffer, particularly an animal under the sacred veil of medical research, and that is why PETA exposed Boston University researcher, Bertram Payne, who damages newborn kittens' brains by drilling holes in their skulls so he can manipulate their tissue in useless neurological studies just so he can publish another paper on human sleep deprivation. He received $3.6 million tax dollars.
@CDLver I'm not going to defend anyone's research I personally haven't read about, but I leave it up to the educated scientific community to decide what is worthwhile research. If it was being done to humans I'm sure you wouldn't be out there protest at their lab. Than again you seem to equate people with live stock. As to research though sometimes people have to do studies to find out what won't work.
Sacrificing animals does not improve the life of humans, it keeps researchers on the payroll of pharmabusiness employed and the pharmaceutical companies rich.
Avastin is a perfect example: Approved as a late-stage breast cancer drug, marketed knowing well that it only provide for 5 more miserable months of an ill-quality life at $8,000 per month. The National Breast Cancer Coalition opposed the marketing of Avastin for providing nothing more than false hope to terminally ill patients.
@CDLver Yes, and don't you find out if a drug works by testing it? You're dodging the question. Admit it you'd rather see people die than take insulin because it is an animal product.
Also don't act like you actually give a damn about people with breast cancer, because I'm sure peta's only interest is in making scientists look bad. What you're saying is it is some conspiracy to keep people employed. Right if the drug companies could do it cheaper and easier don't you think they'd do it?
@CDLver So it was okay for people to die until they made that breakthrough that took decades to develop before the 1980's, because you don't want animals to be harmed. The first "human" insulin didn't come around until 1977 and that was after a lot of research. I suppose if those people had to test their research on animals you'd think it was okay to kill them. Am I right? It is justifiable homicide to your kind right?
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA, and those not profiting from the charade of life-saving medical research oppose the use of animals as models for human disease. Animal experimentation and animal models do not prove that drugs are safe and effective in humans nor are they designed to do that since clearly they cannot.
Human disease is unique to our species; the cures will come from the study of physiology of humans, not animals.
@waratahNSW, normal humans do not forcibly restrain and carve flesh from a baby lamb's body with a scissor to steal his fleece; normal humans do not cart off by ship millions of sheep on a gruesome journey to the Middle East to be savagely slaughtered; and normal humans do not eat the flesh of animals who lived their entire miserably short lives in their own excrement, and who were fed the ground up bodies of dead shelter dogs and cats along with 1 billion pounds of chicken litter.
@waratahNSW, you so-called meat-eating normal humans are being sold slaughterhouse floor sweepings consisting of chicken litter (that's excrement!), rendered bodies of shelter dogs and cats, pus-oosing infected cysts from pig skins, and the contaminated blood and guts of other slaughtered animals.
America's meat is so putrid and diseased that factory-farmed animals must be routinely dosed with human antibiotics, but you go ahead, normal human, feed your head with that slop.
@waratahNSW, no, not all people, just some: Australian wool growers such as yourself, who butcher baby lambs with scissors in order to exploit them for their fleece; Canadian sealers who blugeon baby seals to death for their skins; factory farm humps who kick in the heads of baby calves for entertainment; dogfighters who force two dogs to fight to the death in a sadistic contest of human virility; beer-swilling gunslingers who gun down defenseless animals as they flee for their lives.
Does anyone care that an alcoholic shop lifter that acts from time to time got hit by a bag of flower?
No I didn't think so, way to go peta.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
Animal activist attacks on American retailers increased 377 % in 2008.
According to the Animal Agriculture Alliance 640 acts of sabotage, vandalism, and arson occurred in 2008 against businesses that use animals. Groups involved in the attacks included the Animal Liberation Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF).
Peta the pressure group has supplied funding to the ELF in the past.
The ELF was classified as America's top domestic terror threat by the FBI in 2001
waratahNSW 1 year ago
@waratahNSW, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was once also labeled by the FBI as a subversive terrorist who sought to undermine America.
On January 17, 2011, we celebrate this remarkable liberationist's life with a day of remembrance.
Go figure that FBI, huh?
CDLver 1 year ago
@CDLver Strikes me that Dr. Martin Luther King fought for human rights, something everyone cares about in some regards. I guess you're comparing African Americans to live stock than? All the same thing to you right?
Nobody cares about your "rights" movement. I do think we should treat animals better so they make better quality meat before they're slaughtered in a way that is painless as possible.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
Dr. King's dream was not just limited to his prayers for the healing of relationships between all human beings. He often spoke about his love for animals: "One day the absurdity of the almost universal human belief in the slavery of other animals will be palpable. We shall then have discovered our souls and become worthier of sharing this planet with them."
CDLver 9 months ago
@waratahNSW Good point and who knows how many deaths of working people thanks to sabotage that nobody claimed credit for...
Oh you did leave out that peta which is tax exempted fills elf's war chest and helps keep it's members out of jail. You'd think funding domestic terrorism would be against the law or something. Members of elf have actually been allowed in schools to do terrorism workshops.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, Strikes me that if PETA were funding the ELF as you claim, then the American FBI would seek an indictment under the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act for colluding with so-called "domestic terrorists."
The fact is that the FBI hasn't because PETA didn't. Period.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver Claims? Ah peta has admitted to giving money to individuals who are part of elf and they all but condone their actions. Just because they're hiding it well doesn't mean they aren't guilty, but hey you believe their actions are justified. I mean who get's hurt when you blow up a building right?
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, nobody, least of all PETA, can "hide anything well" from the CIA, you silly sod.
Now, push off with you. I find you a ghastly bore.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver Why if I annoy a fanatic I think I've made a valuable contribution to society, unlike someone like you. So you believe peta who in large part simply annoys people, and funds terrorism is being investigated by the CIA? Grant you I think the IRS and FBI should be looking into peta, but I doubt peta is a danger to national security. And despite what you peta people online want, I'm not going any where.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, fur hags annoy me. Silly nonsensical utterances from useful idiots don't.
The IRS and FBI have been squandering taxpayer money "looking" into PETA for years on behalf of the animal abusing industries that want PETA silenced. PETA is squeaky clean. You lose.
PETA IS a danger to Big Agra and Dairy, who want to sell you the diseased meat and putrid milk from cows who were fed pus-oosing pig skins, chicken shit, and euthanised, ground up shelter dogs and cats.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver lol...now you're being funny. peta is a danger to nobody, well they are if you considered they give money to domestic terrorist, but that link is pretty clear even if you can't prove it in a court of law. Anyway you're favorite group doesn't effect anything. People still consume the foods they wish to eat, wear what they want to, and their celebrity supporters are often hypocrites. The only thing they are are annoying. Like you, but you won't be on youtube much longer.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, do not waste your time trying to fight me. You can never silence the animal rights movement, ever. We only get stronger, and that in part is because of video sharing websites such as YouTube, where we are able to expose the cruelty humans inflict upon innocent animals. I will always be here. Always.
CDLver 9 months ago 2
@CDLver Yes I've heard Newkirk say that a few times, the movement is still here her sanity has left long ago. And you've succeeded in nothing and accomplished little. You'll always be around like a virus will be.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, on the contrary, PETA's successes are many. Very recently a PETA undercover investigation of PLRS, a North Carolina animal contract lab that tests anything and everything on animals, was forced to close down and all 200 of the dogs, cats, rabbits, and other animals were liberated from their isolation cages and placed with shelters for adoption.
PETA is superb at their undercover investigations of animal abusers.
CDLver 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA's successes include more than 1,000 companies who have pledged to not test their products on animals, but only use readily available non-animal methods.
CaringConsumer. com, a PETA website, lists the names and products that as a result of PETA's pressure, no longer blind rabbits in cosmetic testing, no longer force household cleaners down beagle dogs' throats, no longer cage and confine animals in isolation to die miserable deaths for human vanity.
CDLver 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA's successes include their SNIP campaign, Spay and Neuter Immediately, Please, which sterilised 7,300 animals in 2010 at no cost/low cost to their guardians; 64,721 sterilisations since 2001. No one is ever turned away for inability to pay.
While the taxpayers of North Carolina pay $40 million dollars every year to kill shelter animals, PETA is addressing the root of the problem for FREE at no cost to the taxpayers.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver Yes and it is a shame every state agency peta attacks usually does a better job. Plus I have a problem with a group who's leader can't understand why people have children when there are children to adopt telling me what to do with any other aspect of my life.
Nice try though.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
Thanks to PETA's undercover investigation of the North Utah Valley Animal Shelter exposing the shelter for selling healthy, adoptable dogs and cats to the University of Utah to be used in lethal experiments that serve human beings no good, the legal practice of "pound seisure" has ended in Utah.
PETA exposes animal shelters who are supposed to humanely house, care for, and re-home animals, not profit from their sale to research labs.
CDLver 9 months ago
PETA is a fierce and ethical champion for the animals. If not for PETA, General Motors would still be using primates in their crash testing, cosmetic companies would still be blinding rabbits in their cosmetic testing, and animals who would otherwise die in North Carolina's hideous gas chambers are provided with a humane release from a society who has so little regard for them that they would suffocate defenseless animals to death in a metal box for 30 minutes.
CDLver 9 months ago
Thanks to PETA, Bioculture lab, which planned to capture more than 4,000 monkeys from Mauritius and transport them to Guayama, Puerto Rico, to confine them to cages, force the animals to breed, and sell their offspring to U.S. and foreign laboratories for use in painful and deadly tests will never happen! Puerto Rican lawmakers just approved two landmark ordinances banning the import, export, breeding, and use of monkeys in experiments within its boundaries! PETA saves animals!
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver So, rather than curing diseases by doing research on animals close to humans peta as you claim blocked this from happening. Well, mission accomplished. More humans and animals will suffer as scientists are slowed down in doing their research. I'm sure you think the lose of a human life is okay, but I am not like you, I'm rational. If it makes you feel any better though I'd gladly trade your life to have a few hours with my dog again.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
That is exactly what pharmabusiness wants you, a useful idiot, to believe: saving a child means having to kill a non-human animal. Animal research does not save human life. Researchers lie, and PETA has exposed these cuckoo scientists and their animal testing charade.
After pressure from PETA, the American Association for Cancer Research retracted a study by animal experimenter Nagendra Ninagaraj, who deliberately falsified the results of brain tumour experiments on mice.
CDLver 9 months ago
Billions of dollars and 85 failed AIDS vaccines later that were tested on 100s of chimps, who've endured 2 decades of immense suffering, and not a single vaccine proved successful in human clinical trials. These vaccines, however, protected chimps from HIV infection.
"Even if animal experiments did result in a cure for AIDS, OF WHICH THERE IS NO CHANCE, I'd be against it on moral grounds."
Imagine that, Ingrid Newkirk was right!
CDLver 9 months ago
PETA HAS made significant strides for animals tortured in senseless experiments under the guise of medical research.
PETA catapulted the issue of animal suffering in experiments in '81 with the launch of the precedent-setting "Silver Spring monkeys" case, which resulted in the first arrest and criminal conviction of a U.S. animal experimenter on charges of cruelty to animals, the first confiscation of abused laboratory animals, and the first U.S. Supreme Court victory for animals in labs!
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver So everyone who does medical research is really just there to abuse animals for the fun of it.
I've read your propaganda, so I know about the case you're referring too. The sad fact is though most of the time peta screws things up, and the authorities can't use the material they've brought them. Leave the investigating to the professionals.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, I did not say that medical research is just there to abuse animals for fun. You did.
I said that researchers are lining their pockets with federal taxpayer dollars conducting uselss experiments on animals that serve human beings no good purpose.
Who are the profesional investigators looking into abuse of research animals? The 70 APHIS inspectors of the USDA charged with inspecting 10,000 facilities per year. Those professionals? Hah!
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver You mean the people have the nerve to feel that they should be rewarded for their years of hard work. I mean come on they're only coming up with treatments to help people. Also you're not the first to complain about the FDA, but instead of lobbying for change you wine and scream and dress up like animals. Tell me in what context it would be okay to experiment on an animal? You can't so I can't trust you to be subjective on this topic.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA's undercover investigation of PLRS contract animal lab was no "screw up." As you can see on my channel, the lab closed its doors and 200 animals were saved directly because of PETA's investigation and their subsequent formal complaint to the USDA of animal cruelty.
PETA has brought cruel and greedy scientists tormenting innocent animals to their knees like only the world's most influential animal rights organisation can!
CDLver 9 months ago 2
@CDLver Sure whatever, but I want to know are you against all animal testing? Reputable scientist say it is the only way to test life saving drugs and find cures. I'm not talking about cosmetics or proving things we already know. I'm talking about sacrificing animals to improve the lives of human beings and consequently animals as well. Are you like peta in that you'd rather see people suffer than hurt an animal? Can't do research with computers alone and experimenting only humans is unethical.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
Which reputable scientists? The researchers paid to produce favorable "results" for the pharmaceutical industry so that drug companies can market a new cancer therapy every 2 years despite that drug's ineffectiveness and high toxicity to humans, as evidenced by Genentech's latest breast cancer therapy Avastin. Though the data proved that Avastin didn't improve the quality nor extend the life of cancer patients, the FDA approved the drug for use generating 2.3 billion dollars in sales in '07.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver I though the 9-11 truth crowd cornered the market on crazy conspiracies, but you impress me to no end. Is it possible in let's say the last 50 years or so some useful medications were developed that helped people and animal testing was part of the research or was all of it just to make money and torture animals for fun? You're probably right scientists are just a bunch of greedy sadists, they could be people trying to achieve anything meaningful. You're a joke.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, contrary to your inflammatory comment, PETA doesn't want to see any living being suffer, particularly an animal under the sacred veil of medical research, and that is why PETA exposed Boston University researcher, Bertram Payne, who damages newborn kittens' brains by drilling holes in their skulls so he can manipulate their tissue in useless neurological studies just so he can publish another paper on human sleep deprivation. He received $3.6 million tax dollars.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver I'm not going to defend anyone's research I personally haven't read about, but I leave it up to the educated scientific community to decide what is worthwhile research. If it was being done to humans I'm sure you wouldn't be out there protest at their lab. Than again you seem to equate people with live stock. As to research though sometimes people have to do studies to find out what won't work.
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
Sacrificing animals does not improve the life of humans, it keeps researchers on the payroll of pharmabusiness employed and the pharmaceutical companies rich.
Avastin is a perfect example: Approved as a late-stage breast cancer drug, marketed knowing well that it only provide for 5 more miserable months of an ill-quality life at $8,000 per month. The National Breast Cancer Coalition opposed the marketing of Avastin for providing nothing more than false hope to terminally ill patients.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver Yes, and don't you find out if a drug works by testing it? You're dodging the question. Admit it you'd rather see people die than take insulin because it is an animal product.
Also don't act like you actually give a damn about people with breast cancer, because I'm sure peta's only interest is in making scientists look bad. What you're saying is it is some conspiracy to keep people employed. Right if the drug companies could do it cheaper and easier don't you think they'd do it?
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
@NJburbsSeeker, human insulin is not an animal product, hasn't been since 1982.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver So it was okay for people to die until they made that breakthrough that took decades to develop before the 1980's, because you don't want animals to be harmed. The first "human" insulin didn't come around until 1977 and that was after a lot of research. I suppose if those people had to test their research on animals you'd think it was okay to kill them. Am I right? It is justifiable homicide to your kind right?
NJburbsSeeker 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@NJburbsSeeker, PETA, and those not profiting from the charade of life-saving medical research oppose the use of animals as models for human disease. Animal experimentation and animal models do not prove that drugs are safe and effective in humans nor are they designed to do that since clearly they cannot.
Human disease is unique to our species; the cures will come from the study of physiology of humans, not animals.
CDLver 9 months ago 2
@CDLver
I thought animal species were equal to the human species, according to PETA????
CDLever the Peta PARROT
waratahNSW 9 months ago
@waratahNSW, you are a pathetic little sheep mutilator who lacks the intellectual savvy to positively spin Australia's cruelty to sheep.
Humans are animals. Now sod off.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver
Humans are animals. Now sod off? Humans are animals. Now sod off?
Well I am not so sure about the correct classification as what you are CDLever
You don’t behave like a normal human
You don’t eat a normal diet like most of us humans do, have a similar diet to my sheep.
You don’t have any normal humans as friends, just your pet cat
In fact most of we normal meat eating humans, which is about 97% of the world's population would have nothing to do with a bigoted like you CDLever
waratahNSW 9 months ago
@waratahNSW, normal humans do not forcibly restrain and carve flesh from a baby lamb's body with a scissor to steal his fleece; normal humans do not cart off by ship millions of sheep on a gruesome journey to the Middle East to be savagely slaughtered; and normal humans do not eat the flesh of animals who lived their entire miserably short lives in their own excrement, and who were fed the ground up bodies of dead shelter dogs and cats along with 1 billion pounds of chicken litter.
CDLver 9 months ago 2
@waratahNSW, you so-called meat-eating normal humans are being sold slaughterhouse floor sweepings consisting of chicken litter (that's excrement!), rendered bodies of shelter dogs and cats, pus-oosing infected cysts from pig skins, and the contaminated blood and guts of other slaughtered animals.
America's meat is so putrid and diseased that factory-farmed animals must be routinely dosed with human antibiotics, but you go ahead, normal human, feed your head with that slop.
CDLver 9 months ago
@CDLver
Just have a read of this psychotic rant from the Peta parrot
The only thing that is putrid and diseased here is YOU CDLever,
Your putrid and diseased values and attitude towards all people,
Piss off you sad sick freak.
waratahNSW 9 months ago
@waratahNSW, no, not all people, just some: Australian wool growers such as yourself, who butcher baby lambs with scissors in order to exploit them for their fleece; Canadian sealers who blugeon baby seals to death for their skins; factory farm humps who kick in the heads of baby calves for entertainment; dogfighters who force two dogs to fight to the death in a sadistic contest of human virility; beer-swilling gunslingers who gun down defenseless animals as they flee for their lives.
CDLver 9 months ago
PETA: People Eat Tasty Animals.
paomtep 1 year ago
@paomtep If you consider animals raised in their own fecal matter and sexually abused by underpaid workers.. then yeah.. cum meat is tasty lol
GlitteredCupcakez 1 year ago
@GlitteredCupcakez Ha, that doesn't happen. At least not in the majority of cases.
CaptVelocity 1 year ago
Awesome love what he said about lindsay lohan too funny.LOL
BEEFYROCKS123 1 year ago
PETA = entidade do capeta
jpprestesItape 2 years ago
hahahahahah
felipe141094 1 year ago
This is so lame. throwing flour at the girl. sigh
BansheeShan 2 years ago
I cant belive Im saying this but......WAY TO GO PETA!!!!
admiralamadras 2 years ago
OMG
alemao212 2 years ago
Animal, I'd show this nutbag an animals and go off on her like a bear if I were Lindsay....Mmmmm!eat!
YYZED64 2 years ago
ha ha ha sucked in Lindsey
teqwindotcom 3 years ago
Best thing I have ever seen. I laughed so hard that I am seriously hurting. Thanks, Chris!
DjSparkiss 3 years ago